Slashdot Mirror


Author signs MyDoom virus

Mikoca writes "Information Week carries the story of how its author signed it "andy" and left the message "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry." Thanks, Andy!"

629 comments

  1. HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    i know a guy named andy.

    im gonna turn him in for fun and profit

    and

    FP!

    1. Re:HEY! by musicscene · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not before I turn in my pal Andy first... what if he's the same guy? Split it with you.

      --
      "I'm not ashamed I can't function in society like I'm supposed to." - Paul Westerberg
    2. Re:HEY! by GeckoUK · · Score: 0

      I know three guys named Andy, Woohoo! I've finally hit the motherlode!

    3. Re:HEY! by really? · · Score: 4, Funny

      My name _IS_ Andy. Can I turn my self in?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:HEY! by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      It would have been funny had he put Darl's name into the code.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    5. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA public service announcement:

      Would Andy from Russia please report to the US embassy, we would like to speak to you.

      Thank you

    6. Re:HEY! by tasinet · · Score: 1

      Wow! I know 6 "andy"s! [ 6 * microsoft_sco_reward ] :D

    7. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my names andy and so's my wife

    8. Re:HEY! by zephc · · Score: 1

      "Hi, my name is Andy
      I live on the bottom floor
      I live in my mom's basement
      Yes I think you've seen me before"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    9. Re:HEY! by UWC · · Score: 1

      Only if I turn myself in first! -Andy

    10. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew putting that in there was a bad idea. At least they don't have my last name too.

      -Andy Nonymous

    11. Re:HEY! by n.o.d.y.n.e · · Score: 1

      You would think a guy (or gurl) who was about to launch the most widespread computer virus in history (aside form Windoze, which is really just a big virus itself) would come up with something a bit more interesting. Surely, Andy, you must have something more important to say. Otherwise, what's the point? What is your problem Andy? Just email me and we'll work it out old son!

      --
      Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently. - Henry Ford
    12. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you can't

      Bagsy, tunrin this Andy in.

      Thinking about it, my brother is an Andy.

  2. This just in... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next version of Redhat Linux will be code named, "Andy". Because, afterall, MyDoom = Linux.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, and Redhat = Linux... yeah right

    2. Re:This just in... by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought it was going to be codenamed ABBA. You know, like this.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    3. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no! It's Debian that uses the Toy Story characters for release names. Andy is the boy's name.

      Or did you think Slink, Potato, and Woody were random?

    4. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually I was thinking that it fit more in line with Debian (Woody, Sid, Potato, ANDY).

      Hmm. Maybe it was a virus written by Pixar. After all THEY signed Andy on Woody's shoe.

    5. Re:This just in... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      the next version of redhat linux will be called

    6. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Hat Linux doesn't exist anymore, dumbass. You can't make money selling open source.

    7. Re:This just in... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      So, *you're* the one who assigned Linux to MyDoom? Now we'll never know if they were equivalent before or not... :)

    8. Re:This just in... by white-mj · · Score: 1

      The next version of Redhat Linux will be code named, "Andy". Because, afterall, MyDoom = Linux.

      Close, but wrong distro.
      Andy was the boy in Toy Story.

      I can't keep giving out clues here folks!!!

  3. Good thing I'm not named andy by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    Lest I not have a job anymore. :)

    1. Re:Good thing I'm not named andy by mirko · · Score: 1

      Well, this Andy supposedly is a good MS-Windows coder, isn't he ?

      I guess he'll easily find a good job at Microsoft whose 250k$ would rather look like an IT-head hunter fee ;-)

      Let's call ourselves Andrew, Andy, Andre, Andrei or Andrzej...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  4. My opinion by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 0, Troll

    This probably means that the spammers did in fact hire him to write the worm.

    1. Re:My opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impressive deduction, Mr. Sherlock.

    2. Re:My opinion by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Whether it's true or not, that's the first thing that came to my mind, too.

      On the other hand, this signature could be a fake.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:My opinion by 00420 · · Score: 1

      The first thing that came to my mind is that it is somebody working for SCO (to point the blame at Linux zealots), and he feels bad that he has to do this.

      Although the second thing that came to my mind is that's probably not true.

    4. Re:My opinion by Tripster · · Score: 1

      That's my guess, first clue has been since the new virus my incoming virus level increased and judging by the similarities in the spam runs it's a couple of gangs doing the run.

      I don't think this can be stopped until it's legal to vigilante find these arses and perform death penalties on the spot. No problem from my viewpoint, they are nothing but leeches on society anyway with obviously little to offer society in general.

  5. well.. by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "" "If he's really sorry, then why did he release it," said Michele Morelock, technical support leader at anti-virus software maker Sophos Inc. "I would imagine it's much more tongue-in-cheek than saying I'm really sorry for releasing it." ""

    maybe he just got an offer he couldn't refuse...

    i'm sure somebody will say that darl had himself made that offer :)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:well.. by wizarddc · · Score: 4, Funny
      i'm sure somebody will say that darl had himself made that offer :)


      You just fulfilled your own self fulfilling prophecy, young man. Excellent work.
      --
      Th
    2. Re:well.. by radja · · Score: 1

      I work for a company and dont always have the choice to release or not. his boss just ordered him.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    3. Re:well.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well that was just to avoid the flames and to stop people from posting that "it surely was darl and that guy was the last of sco's coders".

      as to the russian references there's not much evidence about it either, nor do I think there ever will. how hard it can be to find a computer .ru that's backdoored by some earlier virus to use for the initial distribution and seemingly be of russian origin?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:well.. by julesh · · Score: 1

      "" "If he's really sorry, then why did he release it," said Michele Morelock, technical support leader at anti-virus software maker Sophos Inc. "I would imagine it's much more tongue-in-cheek than saying I'm really sorry for releasing it." ""

      What I want to know is - how come whenever anybody quotes somebody from an antivirus company, it's _always_ sophos?

    5. Re:well.. by MaxiCat_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting


      'it's always Sophos'

      Mainly because they are small enough to have people with names working for them and their software is pretty good.

    6. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Darl did it! :D

    7. Re:well.. by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That's bullshit.

      He can always say no.

      Of course, he might be risking getting fired for saying it.

      Personally, I'd rather be unemployed than be paid by someone with the ethics to deliberately release software like this.

      Of course, where I live, I'd be paid a reasonable sum for turning the guy in (presumably there would be _some_ sort of paper trail that could be used as evidence... and if there wasn't, what reason would there even be to *START* on the project?). And that would give me some money to live on while I searched for a different job.

      Hmm... now that I think about it, how would this go in an interview...? "Why did you quit your last job?" "My boss asked me to do something that was illegal." You know... I have no idea how the interviewer might respond to that... I could see it going either way.

    8. Re:well.. by cicho · · Score: 1

      "That's bullshit. He can always say no."

      You can't say no to some people. How about this totally unfounded speculation: Maybe some people lent him money, then he got laid off and can't repay. Lots of ways to make someone an offer that's hard to refuse.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    9. Re:well.. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      He should have refused, and once the virus his it ig, turned in either the writer or the boss.

      I wonder how the nondisclosure agreement would affect turning somoene in like that and claiming the reward.

    10. Re:well.. by schuster · · Score: 1

      this is actually a very easy question to answer. it's easy to say, well, why did he release it if he's really sorry. the answer is that he would have to be aware in advance of all the trouble it would cause and what all the fallout would be. he would have to be very farsighted to predict all this (linux fans being accused by SCO, SCO accusing linux fans and so on and so forth) and that's simply not likely at all. that is why the messsage is real.

      -dan

      --
      --- Don't ever trust a woman until she's dead- B.B. King
    11. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contrary to your belief, you CAN say no to those people.

      Its a choice. We make them every day. You might not like the consequences of all your choices though, but thats a different matter entirely.

    12. Re:well.. by tftp · · Score: 1

      In [post-]Soviet Russia nondisclosure agreements are often enforced with a bullet from a TT.

    13. Re:well.. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Try it.

    14. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't get yourself in debt. Life is much easier then.

    15. Re:well.. by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 1
      The creator of what anti-virus experts say is the fastest spreading virus ever on the Internet signed MyDoom and MyDoom.B with "andy," and left the following message in the latter version: "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

      "Our interpretation is that he's apologizing to the general public," Jimmy Kuo, research fellow for anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc., said. "Our guess is that someone is paying him to write this thing."

      Wow, with the skills of inference demonstrated here, I feel safer already...

    16. Re:well.. by mark-t · · Score: 1
      <sarcasm> I suppose you're right... they could always decide to torture him until he's so mentally exhausted that he'd comply anyways, but at that point he's probably not going to be intellectually competent enough to do technical stuff like this.</sarcasm>

      Get real.

      There are laws preventing this sort of thing in most civilized parts of the world, and even if there wasn't where this occurred, he could have still elected to not participate. Submitting to unethical demands because of threats of blackmail or violence offers more strength to the threatener and only encourages further exploitation in the future.

      (This shouldn't be construed as meaning that the choice will always be easy... sometimes doing the right thing is damn difficult because you may be terrified of the outcome, but when all is said and done, it will be your choices that will determine your future, not merely whatever circumstances you find yourself in. Personally, I find that knowledge comforting.)

    17. Re:well.. by nomel · · Score: 1

      beings that it was something highly illegal, I *really* doubt that the employees at this institution get all the benefits that me and you do :) Saying "yes" could have easily been a way to keep paying his life insurance bill.

    18. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, here's a thought. If organized crime has a strong incentive to develop a tool to infect hosts and to harvest accounts data, etc.... who says they hired their virus developer when they could have just made him an offer he literally couldn't refuse? Is this so difficult to imagine, that a multi-billion dollar 'enterprise' would shed tears over the ethical quandry between them and a huge expansion into a new mult-billion dollar revenue stream?

    19. Re:well.. by TachyonAT · · Score: 1

      Well i suppose money was more important to him than actually having any kind of ethics. Seems that happens a lot around this world of ours

    20. Re:well.. by dann0 · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit.
      He can always say no.

      Of course, he might be risking getting fired for saying it.

      Personally, I'd rather be unemployed than be paid by someone with the ethics to deliberately release software like this.
      Sounds like the Death Star Dialog in Clerks:
      ...
      BLUE-COLLAR MAN
      (paying for coffee)
      I'm alive because I knew there were risks involved taking on that particular client. My friend wasn't so lucky. (pauses to reflect) You know, any contractor willing to work on that Death Star knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault. A roofer listens to this... (taps his heart) not his wallet.
      From Awesomefilm.com

      --
      "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
    21. Re:well.. by riprjak · · Score: 1

      sure, someone else may have said this, but...

      Isnt it possible that getting fired was the least of his worries; unless you add the word AT after fired...

      The world isn't a happy place and there are many nations with high technological skill bases without the benefit of the rule of law;

      "Mafia" is a word bandied by the media repeatedly, to the point it has a numbing effect; but the fact remains that there are many viscious and organised eastern european and asian criminal groups that would do this kind of thing to make a buck.

      just my $0.02.
      err!
      jak

    22. Re:well.. by LunarOne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I work for a company and dont always have the choice to release or not. his boss just ordered him.

      That's what many Nazis used as a defense. It didn't work then, and it doesn't work now.

      Okay, that's a little harsh. Still, we all have a choice when faced with ethical decisions, it just comes down to whether or not we have the guts to make the right choice.

      --

      Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
  6. can't blame him by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, he didn't go to four years of Evil Computer Science school just to write another CMS.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:can't blame him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, he didn't go to four years of Evil Computer Science school just to write another CMS.

      This is the cabal. You will be expelled from our evil midths for disseminating part of our evil masterplan. Your properties will be taken from you. Your lands will be pillaged. Your wives raped. And your computers XP-ified.

      Have a nice day,
      Max Evil, CEO,
      Evil Overlords Inc.

  7. Reward...? by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

    I can't get to the article, but wasn't there a reward for turning in the guy that wrote it? Maybe he was trying to turn himself in for the reward money. =)

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:Reward...? by adamvjackson · · Score: 1

      Both SCO and Microsoft were/are offering $250,000 USD for the arrest and conviction of the MyDoom author.

    2. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss doesn't have a vcr in his office. It sounds like an odd thing, but you're probably not too intelligent, so I'll let it pass.

    3. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I suggest you think and listen ALOT more ansd stop talking ot typing...

      Holy fucking shit, man. If you're going to flame on intelligence and education, you should make fucking sure you're not using bullshit words like, "alot" first.

      Owned.

    4. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 50% of people can have IQ's below 100 by definition. Unless you're saying that Americans are dumber than people from other countries.

    5. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > I suggest you think and listen ALOT more ansd stop talking ot typing...

      I suggest you learn 1) how to spell "a lot" and b) read up on "humor."

      Oh, ps, you're a sanctimonious cunt.

    6. Re:Reward...? by mishac · · Score: 1

      Is the mean Iq 100 or is it the median? if its the median, you are right. However, if it is the mean, then you could have EVERYONE with IQs below 100, except for one really smart guy.

    7. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true ... Take these IQs :

      300 (me), 50 (you), 50 (your dog), 50 (your dog's fleas), 50 (your dog's fleas' hair).

      300+50+50+50+50 = 600 / 5 = 100 (Which the average IQ is)

      20% > 100 IQ
      80% 100 IQ

    8. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, in retrospect I'm wrong here I think... but it doesn't change the fact that the parent poster is a dumbass.

    9. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I've been saying for years. Americans really are dumber.

    10. Re:Reward...? by gilmour14 · · Score: 1

      The median IQ is 100, making 50% of the population less than 100.

    11. Re:Reward...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Jin. I love you.

    12. Re:Reward...? by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

      This would only work if they realigned the scores every year to make 100 the median, making comparing the scores from different years entirely useless.

      They don't readjust that often, but they have readjusted twice since the system's inception, both 10 point moves to inflate the ever decreasing scores. So 80 (borderline retarded) on the original test now nets you 100 (average). Pretty sad huh?

  8. Give me the money! by broxys · · Score: 1

    I know an and I'd sure like to sell for a quarter million dollars!!!

  9. Right, that's his real name. by musingmelpomene · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

    1. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 4, Funny

      So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

      Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

    2. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Phekko · · Score: 1

      So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

      Yes, unless he used reverse psychology and thought that nobody would believe his name is Andy. Or maybe he thought we'd think that he thought no-one would believe his name is Andy, or perhaps... Crud, I'm in a loop. This virus is VERY nasty indeed. Damn you Andy/notAndy!

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    3. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is exactly what he expects people to say. That way he will be safe because no one will look for an Andy. Unless, of course, he expected this post exposing his tricked.

    4. Re:Right, that's his real name. by plams · · Score: 1

      But perhaps that's just what he WANTS you to think... now where did I put that tinfoil hat?

    5. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait till he gets going!

    6. Re:Right, that's his real name. by proj_2501 · · Score: 0

      I'm not Spartacus!

    7. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, you two. :-)

      "You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means."

    8. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Andy is a clue. I fed $Andy into the Bat Crime Computer and came up with a a close match to the greek word "Andros," which means "man". So maybe the MyDoom virus was written for the benefit of all mankind.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    9. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, or he would reason that by calling himself andy, everybody will assume he is not called, andy, and therefore, andy, the author, will be quite safe.......

    10. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Chase · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now, a clever man would use his real name, because he would know that only a great fool would believe he was given. We are not great fools, so we can clearly not choose Andy. But he must have known we were not a great fools, he would have counted on it, so clearly his name must be Andy...

      So you've made you're choice?

      You'd like to think so wouldn't you!

      You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is "Never get involved in a debate over *NIX editors", but only slightly less famous is this: "Never go in against a Geek, when *Linux* is on the line!". Hahahahahah!

      *Thud*

      --
      -==-
    11. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Macguyvok · · Score: 1

      "If he were telling the truth, he wouldn't have told us." "Unless, of course, he knew you wouldn't believe the truth even if he told it to you."

      That's my take on it.

      "...And really bad eggs... Drink up me hearties, Yo Ho!"

      --
      --Mac "Nine point eight meters per second squared: The Best Damn Windows Accelerator, Ever."
    12. Re:Right, that's his real name. by SirLantos · · Score: 1

      Yes, but maybe he knew that everyone else would know that a virus writer wouldn't be foolish enough to put their real name on it. So, by putting his real name on it, it would make the world believe that his name is anything BUT Andy. So, he obviously can put his real name in it.

      World: "Are you done?"

      Not even close. The world probably knew that the virus writer was smart enough to figure that out. So, he obviously can't put real his name in it.......

      --
      The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    13. Re:Right, that's his real name. by mpe · · Score: 1

      So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

      So you'd be better off looking for someone who dosn't like "Andy". Maybe the next virus will be signed "George", "Tony", "Saddam", "Osama", "Ariel"...

    14. Re:Right, that's his real name. by cdrudge · · Score: 0, Funny

      Ah. But "Andy" probably knows that the FBI no doubt very cunning and they will realize that no person would really put their name on the code. So instead of using a differnet name, he uses his real name so that the FBI looks at people whose name is not Andy, when all along they really should have been looking for Andy. But...Andy might realize that the FBI knows this and would take this into account so he might want to use a name not really his...

      Mia culpa to the script writers of The Princess Bride...

    15. Re:Right, that's his real name. by musingmelpomene · · Score: 1
      *titters*

      Well, "she," actually, but excellent work nonetheless.

    16. Re:Right, that's his real name. by kitzilla · · Score: 0

      Andy must be a balding Sicilian.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    17. Re:Right, that's his real name. by jpmoney · · Score: 0

      Yeah, anything that draws that much attention to my cubicle (from my laughing out loud) deserves a +6 at least...

      --
      unf.
    18. Re:Right, that's his real name. by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes -- Russia, and you must have suspected I would have known the virus's origin, so I can clearly not choose the name in front of me.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    19. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      Actually, "andros" means a human of the masculin gender. Man/mankind is represented by the word "antropos" in greek, hence "antropology", which is the study of humankind.

    20. Re:Right, that's his real name. by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      or "Darl"

    21. Re:Right, that's his real name. by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

      Or it might be he is clever enough to think we would think he would not use his real name...

      So his real name is Andy.

      (That, or it is Anonymous Coward)

      M

    22. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more Princess Bride references now, I mean it!

      Anybody want a peanut?

    23. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Pike · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Where was I?

    24. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Damn.. and I had mod points yesterday.

      Great "Princess Bride" reference!

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    25. Re:Right, that's his real name. by dbolger · · Score: 1

      ...unless of course, he KNEW we'd assume that, and put his real name down so we would never think to look for somebody named Andy...

    26. Re:Right, that's his real name. by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      um, i thought, that's the concept: you use your real name because noone in his clear mind would not use a fake name. since everyone would expect a fake name, you might just as well use your real one. so actually, we're looking for andy.

      even more, since he didn't give a last name, we can infer that in fact he does have a last name (otherwise he'd faked it!). clearly, if your andy is called just andy and nothing more, that's not the guy.

      as stupid as a virus-writer

      um, i thought that a considerable amount of skill and experience is necessary to create such successful pieces of software. yes, a virus is primarily a pest, but its also code - good code in the case of cleverly written viruses and worms.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    27. Re:Right, that's his real name. by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      INCONCEIVABLE!

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    28. Re:Right, that's his real name. by revividus · · Score: 5, Funny
      >>So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

      >Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

      But he must have known that we were not stupid, either, and so clearly he knew we would look for someone NOT named Andy, which means that we cannot rule out anyone who IS named Andy, either.

      But wait! I'm just getting started!

      The first detection of the virus was in Russia, and as everybody knows, in Soviet Russia the noun verbs YOU, so we clearly cannot rule out anyone who happens to be named "Novarg" or, uh, "MyDoom"...

      But Russia, as everybody knows, is entirely people by communists, and communists never do anything by themselves, but always as a group. So clearly we cannot rule out the entire nation of Russia working in concert to produce this virus.

      But the virus writer, knowing we were not stupid, undoubtedly knew that we would deduce all these facts about Russia, and so we clearly cannot rule out any one in the population of the rest of the world.

      Are we there yet? Not even close!

      The vast majority of virus writers are never caught, which means they are very careful. Very careful people do not unwittingly reveal their names, so we clearly must presume that the writer did not think the inclusion of the name "andy" would be of any help to us in finding him (or her).

      So then "andy" must have felt safe and secure amidst the worldwide sea of other andys, especially having not posted to /. in almost a year. Clearly the virus writer is andy.

    29. Re:Right, that's his real name. by SirLantos · · Score: 1

      Inconceivable!!!

      --
      The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    30. Re:Right, that's his real name. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      virus:
      -Can you hear that, Mr. Anderson? That is the sound of innevitability. That is the sound of your death. Good bye, Mr. Anderson.

      Andy:
      -My name... is... NEO!

    31. Re:Right, that's his real name. by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Oh my god! I know sombody not named Andy!

      Looks like I'm gonna make a few bucks from SCO.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    32. Re:Right, that's his real name. by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Dude, the joke is over.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    33. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 4, Funny

      *waves hand* This is not the Andy you're looking for...

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    34. Re:Right, that's his real name. by p00ya · · Score: 1
      So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive.

      Fool! That's just what he wants you to think!
    35. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean ανθροπ&omicr on; ς, right?

    36. Re:Right, that's his real name. by revividus · · Score: 1
      I'm slow (read: I should be working).

      When I started writing the joke had just started. :-)

    37. Re:Right, that's his real name. by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Note to the humor impared: this is a play on the movie The Princess Bride, noobs

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    38. Re:Right, that's his real name. by hesiod · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Inconceivable!!!

      You keep using that word... I do not believe it is as funny as you think it is funny.

    39. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy

      That's what Andy wants you to think.

    40. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      now that's funny.

    41. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Australia

    42. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A she eh? I don't know any girls named Andy...did you write the virus?!

    43. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So wouldn't that be The Princess Bride impaired? Having a sense of humor won't help you recognize lines from a movie you have never seen.

    44. Re:Right, that's his real name. by 74nova · · Score: 2, Funny

      so you've made your decision?

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    45. Re:Right, that's his real name. by lysium · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just look at his karma. He is obviously a malcontent, and a deeply-placed one at that (ID 2990!). Quick, round up an angry mob! Vigilante justice will surely please the media at large.

      ============

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    46. Re:Right, that's his real name. by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      That's Inconceiveable!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    47. Re:Right, that's his real name. by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      comment
      He works in Tulsa for a telecom company. Go get him, angry mob!

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    48. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're like 15 posts too late bud. The whole Princess Bride thing has already been done to death. You suck.

    49. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ouch! My name is NOT Andy... So now I'll be prime suspect! Perhaps I should CHANGE my name legally to Andy, or at least ask my buddies to start calling me Andy?

      This is getting creepy, man...

    50. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Never go in against a Geek, when *Linux* is on the Line!"

      I think you mean Suse-ilian

    51. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Yo_mama · · Score: 1

      Where was I?

      --
      Never understimate the power of human stupidity -Lazarus Long
    52. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we're looking for a nation of communist Andy's ?

    53. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it not occur to the feds or whoever that maybe "Thanks, Andy" is refering to THANKING SOMEONE WHO IS NAMED ANDY?! I mean... uh... duh.

    54. Re:Right, that's his real name. by APDent · · Score: 1

      But he must have known that we were not stupid, either

      Inconceivable!

    55. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      Russia.

    56. Re:Right, that's his real name. by TrevizeNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Inconceivable!

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    57. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Old+Man+Of+Arran · · Score: 1

      what I want to know, is where did we leave that wheelbarrow the albino had?

      --
      the only things worth living for are Chinese food and Women - Dudley Moore
    58. Re:Right, that's his real name. by tasinet · · Score: 2, Funny

      public void look()
      {
      //Or ARE we looking for an Andy, as he is expecting us to think like this:
      //So now we're looking for anyone NOT named Andy, because even someone as stupid as a
      //virus-writer wouldn't be so dumb as to put their real name on something this destructive

      notlook();
      }

      public void notlook()
      { //Or ARE we NOT looking for one, as he expects us to think like
      look(); }
      JavaLangExecError:Confused

    59. Re:Right, that's his real name. by DeckerEgo · · Score: 1

      Australia.

    60. Re:Right, that's his real name. by sharkey · · Score: 1
      So then "andy" must have felt safe and secure amidst the worldwide sea of other andys, especially having not posted to /. in almost a year. Clearly the virus writer is andy.

      Inconceivable!!!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    61. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your testicles feel bigger now?

    62. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      Or maybe thats just what he wants us to think...

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    63. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Inconceivable!!!

      You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    64. Re:Right, that's his real name. by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

      Well, "she," actually, but excellent work nonetheless.

      Come on, you're not fooling anyone - I visited your blog, and I'm pretty certain there are no women as attractive as 'you' posting to /.

      Ten pounds (US dollars if you prefer) says you're male, ~30 years old, morbidly obese and living in your mother's basement.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    65. Re:Right, that's his real name. by TachyonAT · · Score: 1

      Whew, looks like i'm off the hook.... you however are in big trouble my friend :-p -Andy

    66. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Chr1s-Cr0ss · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what if he anticipated that people would think he wouldn't be stupid enough to use his real name, so he actually did use his real name because he knew nobody would be looking for him then.

      --

      68.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    67. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --For anyone who doesn't "get it" - watch the movie "The Princess Bride":

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0093779/board/nest/58880 11
      http://imdb.com/title/tt0093779/

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    68. Re:Right, that's his real name. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Vezzini: Haha.. you fool! You fell victim to one of the classic
      blunders. The most famous is: Never get involved in a land war in
      Asia. Only slightly less well know is this: Never go in against a
      Sicilian when death is on the line!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    69. Re:Right, that's his real name. by ocie · · Score: 1

      Or "never go against a penguin when herring is on the line"

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    70. Re:Right, that's his real name. by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      You know, I got modded down to ZERO for "overrated." Guess not everyone knows a good movie when they read it. ;-)

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    71. Re:Right, that's his real name. by HeX314 · · Score: 1

      So what if the writer put his name on the virus because he knew we would think that he would think that we would think that his name wasn't really Andy, and thus, he could get away with it because he put his name on it, and we thought that the name he put on it wasn't really his real name. Any questions?

    72. Re:Right, that's his real name. by musingmelpomene · · Score: 1

      *smile* I'll take the pounds, at the current exchange rate, what proof would you like? I happen to have a geek boy fetish. ;-)

    73. Re:Right, that's his real name. by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
      I suppose a video-clip would be the hardest to forge, short of a real-life meeting of course.

      Drop me a mail, samb at forkqueue.com and we can sort something out :)

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  10. Andy... sure! by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I imagine lots of people in eastern bloc countries name their children "Andy". Plus, Andy is just a first name, it's not like s/he listed their home address or an IP or something like that. Still, it is interesting that they said this was just "their job"... organized crime hacking, perhaps?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Andy... sure! by adamvjackson · · Score: 5, Informative

      I subscribe to an email list from www.insecure.org, as I'm sure several of us /.'ers do. Anyway, recently there was an article that summarized that according to the FBI, quite a lot of viruses, worms, and spam can supposedly be traced to organized crime. Apparently Eastern Europe seems to be a hub for this activity, according to that report.

    2. Re:Andy... sure! by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      I hear that as well, and especially in the smaller-scale stuff -- this is the most sophisticated virus attack I've seen since the Michelangelo virus that came in prepackaged software. Is there any direct evidence on this particular attack as to its origin, or are they just guessing still (publicly)?

      --
      stuff |
    3. Re:Andy... sure! by adamvjackson · · Score: 1

      And the link to that article, in case anyone is interested: http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/sfonline/colu mnists-item.pl?id=215

    4. Re:Andy... sure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why do i get the feeling you would have said lots of people in the eastern bloc name their kid ______ no matter _what_ the name was.

      way to stereotype and jump the gun on premature finger pointing, and FYI, _nobody_ in the eastern bloc names their kid 'andy'

    5. Re:Andy... sure! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Anyway, recently there was an article that summarized that according to the FBI, quite a lot of viruses, worms, and spam can supposedly be traced to organized crime. Apparently Eastern Europe seems to be a hub for this activity, according to that report.

      Then we should give the FBI all the funding they request!! It's what they would have wanted...

    6. Re:Andy... sure! by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really take their word for it... at the very least I would be careful with the interpretation. What exactly do they mean by "organized crime"?

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    7. Re:Andy... sure! by Servo · · Score: 1

      Maybe Andy works for the FBI and released MyDoom so they could get more funding.

      Come on, conspiracies have been floating around for ages that the anti-virus software companies release a lot of virii. It makes sense. Right?

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    8. Re:Andy... sure! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was just saying that you need to watch many groups, including the FBI. They over-inflate risks etc in order to get budget. Every interest group does this, from environmentalists to industrialists.

      No big conspiracy...

    9. Re:Andy... sure! by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FBI reports have in the past tended to sometimes be ridiculously loaded with over-exaggerations for purposes of lobbying the US government to increase (a) their funding and (b) their powers. Recall, even some years before the US invaded Iraq, reports of the Iraqi government (and there were reports of the Cuban government too) having a vast network of computers and computer hackers dedicated to creating major hacking threats to the US's 'IT infrastructure'. Dubious links to "national security risks". E.g. see http://www.landfield.com/isn/mail-archive/2003/Jan /0094.html. More similar propaganda about China: http://www.mail-archive.com/marxism@lists.panix.co m/msg21238.html.

      Although there is often some mild hacking activity from countries like this, the FBI sometimes WILDLY distorts the facts, and obviously it is in their interest to do so, since the result is the Senate assigning them ever greater funding and greater powers.

    10. Re:Andy... sure! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Maybe by "job" they meant moral duty?

    11. Re:Andy... sure! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Yep, and the funeral homes are killing people, and the weight loss programs are making people fat, and dentists are making your teeth bad, and, and and... :)

    12. Re:Andy... sure! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There are big conspiracies. Can you say Republican or Democrat? Do you know the *real* purposes of those power groups? (Hint: "The purpose of power is power." [I forget who that's a quote from])

      Actually, there are LOTS of big conspiracies, depending on how you measure big. Which would you consider bigger, the auto companies, or the machinists union? Both of them are conspiring to enrich themselves at your expense.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:Andy... sure! by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      If virus writers were truly malicious, why don't they add "format c:" code to their viruses? I know the virus does not want to destroy its host, but once the virus has propagated itself to everyone in your Outlook Address Book, then it can safely format your hard disk (immediately or say 1-2 days later).

      That there have been no such viruses is very suspicious. Maybe the virus writer are spammers who just want to install zombie email relays...

    14. Re:Andy... sure! by Servo · · Score: 1

      You mean its not McDonalds fault I'm fat? Its Jenny Craig? Damn, you learn something new every day.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    15. Re:Andy... sure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Linux funds Terrorism! I can see the ad now... for the next Superbowl...

  11. sorry for what by mr_tommy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This guy isn't sorry. Sticking in things like this merely give the virus more media attention, and diverts attention from the real issue here : insecurity, and user failure to patch up.

    1. Re:sorry for what by adamvjackson · · Score: 1

      I suppose this is a case of money (M) and morals (Mo). Now, if M>Mo... Profit!!

    2. Re:sorry for what by leifm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exploit does MyDoom take advantage of, other than user stupidity?

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    3. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean, user failure to recognize an obvious trojan attachment?

      due to some software constraints, I have to use WinXP, and it's patched up to the gills with the latest SPs and whathaveyou.

      I dont use Outlook normally, but since it was patched along with everything else, I had a look at what happens to attachments.

      When you get an attachment in an email, Outlook blocks any attempts to open it by default. I dug around the options a bit and found a way to undo that option, and enable attachments.

      it's an all or nothing default option, so you can imagine Joe Clueless going "wtf cant I open that fricken attachment" and then proceed to huff and puff while poking around to enable attachments, and then not even think twice and open ALL attachments, just to show em.

      but i havent received any suspicious emails yet, so i wasnt able to see if mydoom can infect a patched up outlook if the antivirus software is disabled.

    4. Re:sorry for what by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      User stupidity is the bigist security hole there is. It is often exploited and east to patch with a ballpen hammer.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:sorry for what by jarran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "exploit" is the feature of dumb Microsoft mail clients which makes it so easy to execute random programs which arrive by e-mail.

      Why not just remove this feature? How many people would really be inconvenienced if it was impossible to execute a program that arrived by e-mail?

      It's possible that many users would still be stupid enough to save executables and run then anyway. In which case, the executables should be tagged as "Insecure" when they arrive by e-mail. If users then save them and try to run them, a big scary looking warning box should pop up, suggesting that the user probably doesn't really want to run the program.

      This wouldn't eliminate the problem. You can never totally prevent users being stupid. But if users have to think for longer than it takes to double click on an icon, the damage caused by these virus would be geratly reduced.

      (DISCLAIMER: I haven't actually used Outlook for years, so maybe it does something like this already, in which case I withdraw this comment and admit I'm wrong. :) )

    6. Re:sorry for what by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MyDOOM takes advantage of the user's ability to run executables directly from his/her email client.

      why would you ever want to do this? i can't even think of the last time I got an executable attachment that wasn't a virus.

      all email programs should disable the feature that allows you to double click on an icon and launch a virus. because:
      A) no one needs a "feature" like this. Save to Disk and then run if neccesary.
      B) icons are designed to be clicked. as desktop users, we're trained to click on things. it's how we interact with our computer.
      C) a warning dialog after the double-click is useless. The person has already decided to run the program, to them it just seems like annoying interference from their stupid computer.

      --
      It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    7. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong.. outlook has executing attachments locked down by default now.

    8. Re:sorry for what by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      Yes users are dumb enough to run the executables themselves. Look at how many users run Kaaza Media Desktop, Weather bug and other fine spy ware programs. Outlook 2003 by default doesn't allow the user to run executable files, and there is a patch coming out soon to fix the file type hiding problem.

    9. Re:sorry for what by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Well a exe/virus can look as a text file (via icon) http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=841 769

      on outlook express... others don't care

      Yes user stupidity but its all the client they choose or have to choose since its pre installed

    10. Re:sorry for what by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Outlook 2003 is a part of ms office, hundreds of dollars to buy. We speak about the Outlook Express crap which is installed to PCs without their will.

    11. Re:sorry for what by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plenty of people have been infected with MyDoom after saving and subsequently running the executable. Nice try though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:sorry for what by ceeam · · Score: 1

      ren shit.exe shit.zip
      start shit.zip

      You may have expected WinZip (or whatever) to be opened? You did not expect shit.zip to be launched as executable!!! Did you?

    13. Re:sorry for what by rar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As many other has commented, the ability to click-and-run executables from the email clients is not the only reason for virus/worms spreading. Even with only 'save to disk' functionality, people will still run these binaries.

      It is often said that what users fail to understand is that they should not run "untrusted binaries". But in my opinion this is the greatest shortcoming of all modern operating systems. I want my operating system to shield resources beloninging to one binary from another. Much in the same way it shields the actions of one user on a muliti user unix system from affecting another user. Why can't the same basic ideas be used when I run 'nice-screen-saver.exe' to NOT allow it access to 'email-addresses.txt'?!

      Instead of having this functionality, I am told that the solution is to only run "trusted binaries"? But come on, it's not like I can personally audit all the code I run; and even if that would be possible it is easy to miss small bugs that eventually will run 'rm -rf' in my home directory. The point of this discussion is that NO binary should be ALLOWED to do 'rm -rf' in my home directory without me externally authorizing that operation. Exactly as I cannot read or delete user 'joe's files without his authorization.

    14. Re:sorry for what by jred · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not just executables. I know a user whose email server blocks all executable attachments. But you see, they received a zip file. Try this scenario:

      Oh, an email from... me? I didn't send myself an email. I think I'll open it. What's this? A zip file? I don't recognize it. Hmm, I think I'll open it. Aha! There's a program here that I've never seen before. I wonder why I zipped it up and emailed it to myself. I guess I better run it...

      Yes, in case you were wondering, this *actually* happened. I don't think MS could do anything to protect users such as this. I suppose they *could* run Knoppix or something, at least until more Linux viruses are floating around.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    15. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - that sounds like a freaking unbelievably fantastically STUPID idea. What do you want to do - specify exactly what regions of memory and resources an executable can access when you run it? Let's just take usability back 100 steps why don't we? I can just imagine the phone calls from grandma now: "Sonny, my screensaver stopped working" "Oh grandma, you dummy, you need to right-click it and select 'Run as Screensaver'! DUH"

      Brilliant.

    16. Re:sorry for what by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      all email programs should disable the feature that allows you to double click on an icon and launch a virus

      You are not going to believe how many calls a week I get from people who ask me to help them disable the virus protection enabled in Outlook Express. Because the customer is always right, I have to show them the way, even though im cringing everytime I hear them click open that attachment Outlook Express thinks is a virus. Sorry folks, I might be contributing to the destruction of the planet, but I still get paid handsomly for doing it...

    17. Re:sorry for what by spitzak · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes it primarily relies on user stupidity. But it really exploits a bug in Outlook in order to hide or disguise the file type. Anybody who claims this does not use a Windows bug is lying. Yes I'm sure some people managed to run it from other mail readers, but there is specific code in there to take advantage of the extension-hiding bug and I'm sure that tripled or more how many clicks there were!

    18. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the propogations are zipped. Users will unzip it and run it. Saving to disk has no bearing on this issue.

    19. Re:sorry for what by Insane_zoD · · Score: 1
      This guy isn't sorry.

      Maybe he's saying "sorry" TO the Linux community, knowing they'll bear the brunt of bad publicity from this.

    20. Re:sorry for what by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      From the story, not the article: "Thanks, Andy!".

      So the slashdot community is now saying that viruses are good, is that it?

    21. Re:sorry for what by firewrought · · Score: 1
      Instead of having this functionality, I am told that the solution is to only run "trusted binaries"? But come on, it's not like I can personally audit all the code I run; and even if that would be possible it is easy to miss small bugs that eventually will run 'rm -rf' in my home directory.

      Trust is pretty much the basis from which you *have* to work here. There are three problems with your proposal: (1) it would be difficult/impossible to implement in a satisfactory manner; (2) users would be very prone just to OK their way through the warning messages [much like they do when they launch the attachment in the first place]; and (3) this would pose extra difficulties in production environments where code must run unattended or users must be handed quick-fixes in the form of batch files, etc.

      #2 is trickier than it seems: the Java VM lets applets run in a sandboxed space. Applets can request elevated permissions, and the user must OK it manually. (This appears to be the level of granularity you are thinking about.) But users still just click their way through it w/o understanding the implications.

      Microsoft maybe onto the right thing with signed binaries (as much as I'm suspicious of the concept). You do have a point... more native sandboxing capability might be a worthwhile thing to have.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    22. Re:sorry for what by beggarstune · · Score: 1
      As many other has commented, the ability to click-and-run executables from the email clients is not the only reason for virus/worms spreading. Even with only 'save to disk' functionality, people will still run these binaries.
      Come on, the sort of people who run programs they download from strangers can't even find them after they've saved them to their disks because they're buried 6 directory levels deep in the "My Documents" directory. God, I hate that dumb-down "My Documents" crap...
      --
      (S+C) x (B+F)/T = V
    23. Re:sorry for what by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      C, I agree with, but not A and B.

      A) no one needs a "feature" like this. Save to Disk and then run if neccesary.

      First off, I don't like other people telling me what feature I need or don't need. Second, I find it very conventient being able to d-click attachments, be it zip, jar, pdf, doc or anything else from withing my e-mail app.
      I get a bunch of mail with attachments daily from colleagues / managers / partners / internal labs etc. and I use my email app as a storage for about 3/4 of the attachments I receive. The reasons are three-fold. One, I don't have to create directory structures and file stuff in folders on my disk. Two, using the e-mail app's built in database with automatic indexing makes finding stuff as simple as using google. Three, the attachments are located together with the e-mail body and header which means they are context-wise correctly located. Together the email and the attachments are often more valuable than each one by itself.

      B) icons are designed to be clicked. as desktop users, we're trained to click on things. it's how we interact with our computer.

      Exactly (though you probably mean't something else than what my reasoning will lead to), as my e-mail app displays the attachments with both their desktop icons as well as their filenames and extensions, It's visually the same as clicking on a desktop icon.

      I really don't understand how preventing people from running a virus/trojan from their e-mail app is any more secure than forcing the user to first detach the virus/trojan, save it to a folder or desktop and then run it from the folder/desktop?
      If the user initiates the attachment's "default behavior" from their email app, then obviosly, they're intent on "launching" it and event if they're forced to detach the payload the consequence will be the same.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    24. Re:sorry for what by MrMrBen · · Score: 1

      It's also important to remember that one of the tricks MyDoom uses is to put a file that looks like message.txt inside of a .ZIP file. First of all, whether or not you open it directly from the email program or save it disk first doesn't seem to make a big difference. But what's clever here is that you see a .ZIP file, so you think, that can't hurt me, it's not an executable, why don't I see what's inside. You open it up, and you find a file called message.txt. Well, even if I double click it, it's not going to run a program, since it's a txt file. Except of course, it's actually message.txt .pif, which somehow runs a program, even though the user can't tell that the icon he's clicking on is an executable. The problem here is that when you click on something, you have no way of knowing what the potential consequences might be. The problem here is that you can make one type of file pretend to be another type. There should be no way to present a file capable of executing instructions as a data file. I wouldn't be surprised if a good number of people who got infected wouldn't normally execute something they knew was executable.

    25. Re:sorry for what by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      As I understand it, they are enabling the same thing as default within Outlook Express.

      Don't know for sure since I haven't used OE for quite a while now.

    26. Re:sorry for what by rar · · Score: 1
      What do you want to do - specify exactly what regions of memory and resources an executable can access when you run it?

      There is already a memory protection barrier between running binaries on most OS:es, and yet you don't need to specify "regions of memory" for those to run in. I think most other resource barriers can be handled as transparently, but one has to discuss them on a case-to-case basis. The primary resource under discussion here (which should be clear from my previous comment) is the actual disk storage space for a user; so lets examine that in the following:

      Let a binary access files in an own storage (like a home directory for the application, much like the common '~/.name/*' in unix). Now, an UI application that want to access ANY OTHER file should HAVE TO go through an OS API that brings up a STANDARDLIZED 'open file' dialog or similar.

      So, let us now re-examine your grandma installing the legetime screensaver you sent her in an email.
      She double-clicks the screensaver and a dialog appears:

      The following application:
      coward-screen-saver-setup.exe
      Wants to edit one of your files:
      ~/.gnome/user-config
      That file have the following description:
      "Configuration file for the behaviour and apperence of your workspace."
      The application gave the following explanation:
      "This nifty screensaver wants to replace your old screensaver in your workspace configuration file."
      Is it okay for the application to edit the above named file?
      [Yes] [No] [Help]

      I guess this interface can be somewhat more streamlized; but, I don't think dialogs like this would get in the way. Under normal opening of say "word files", applications will have to use the standalized 'open file' dialog; which also grants access to the file. Exceptional needs (like access to the whole disk for, say, a disk defragmenter) can be asked for and granted by the user during installation.
    27. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because /home/$USER is so much different from \Documents and Settings\$USER. Yep.

      It's a home directory

    28. Re:sorry for what by rar · · Score: 1

      There are three problems with your proposal: (1) it would be difficult/impossible to implement in a satisfactory manner

      As you say, it is already somewhat available for Java VM applications. And, as I mentioned in my original comment, the resource barries I talk about are already available between different users in multi user systems.

      (3) this would pose extra difficulties in production environments where code must run unattended or users must be handed quick-fixes in the form of batch files, etc.

      Let say that code that must run unatended asks for the needed priviledges during installation. I would say 'yes' to grant my disk defragmenter access to any file on my disk at any time; I would not do that to the 'fancy-screen-saver.exe' I just got in the mail.

      Quick-fixes deliverd as batch-files etc: These are based on your customer completely trusting you. You will anyway have explain how to run your "batch script" etc. I don't see the problem with including something like: "trust me, select 'yes' when the big scary dialog pops up giving you a huge warning about how much this looks like a virus."

      (2) users would be very prone just to OK their way through the warning messages [much like they do when they launch the attachment in the first place];

      Yes, this is the main obstacle. Still, I have the impression that the difference is to bring up *unexpected* dialogs that are *rare*, big and scary enough.

      The regular email clients pops up warnings for each attached "word file" a user opens. When you have seen that dialog 10 times for legetime emails, its natural to have the 'ok'-click learnt as a reflex. But if a user opens his 'contents.zip' with something that looks like a txt-file inside; he expects notepad to start with the file, but if this time an unexpected red warning dialog states something along the lines of "This application tries to search through all files in your home directory and may do as it please with any information therein, is this okay with you?". Hopefully the fact that this warning is unexpected makes enough users stop and think. That would at least somewhat dampen the propagation of our usual emails worms...

    29. Re:sorry for what by rar · · Score: 1

      Come on, the sort of people who run programs they download from strangers can't even find them after they've saved them to their disks because they're buried 6 directory levels deep in the "My Documents" directory. God, I hate that dumb-down "My Documents" crap...

      Have you watched any such Windows users in action? My impression is that they, much like everyone else, have this autonomous reflex to click 'my desktop' + 'save' upon seeing any 'where to save this file' dialog...

    30. Re:sorry for what by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      User stupidity is the bigist security hole there is. It is often exploited and east to patch with a ballpen hammer.
      -----

      It sounds like you need to take another whack at it. Need to borrow a hammer? ;]

    31. Re:sorry for what by bertnewton · · Score: 1

      MyDOOM takes advantage of the user's ability to run executables directly from his/her email client.

      If they were running a recent (patched) version of Outlook or Outlook Express, they would have been unable to execute the attachment as it is "unsafe". I actually *tried* to infect a test machine with this virus and couldn't without modifying the registry to allow these attachments.

      The problem is people running old (98, Me, etc) and unpatched versions of Windows.

    32. Re:sorry for what by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "User stupidity is the bigist security hole there is. It is often exploited and east to patch with a ballpen hammer"

      Its also exploited by;
      politicians, religions, capitalism in general

      Its what makes the world go 'round, don't knock it.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    33. Re:sorry for what by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

      All the things you just said for Outlook, How about this , what about that, as far as saving files and/or auto running files and having warnins popup etc can all be found in

      Eudora. Eudora is the only mail client i have ever used does all i need it to and nothing i dont.

      Now i could lie and say i have never gotten a virus from using it, but i'll tell you the truth, back before i knew any better i got screwed over by what ever the big nasty worm / virus was at the time ( i cant remember its name ) , and had to format.

      But even then it was hard to do, Click *hey buddy, the attachments are over there* .. Clickety *uh.. this dont look so good , sure you want to do this!!?? * ... Clickety Click .. *dumbass* /me Uh-oh .. =(

    34. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just thinking you're an idiot just for posting...

      All furthur posts by you will be moderated -4 idiotic (idiotic).

      Get a clue...

    35. Re:sorry for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you totally stupid? C'mon....

    36. Re:sorry for what by jarran · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's hardly relevant. It's trivially easy to make a mail client the works like this, so it doesn't surprise me that Eudora is far less braindead.

      The point is, Eudora is a niche market. Eudora is used by a tiny number of people compared to Lookout.

      The users that double click on attachments without thinking are the same users who are never going to install Eudora, but rather just use Outlook because it's what's been given to them.

    37. Re:sorry for what by firewrought · · Score: 1
      I've typed up a few long responses to your post, but let me cut to the chase: you're trying to solve a social problem with technological means. Yes, resource isolation can be an effective tool for improving security (I use it myself, frequently), but ***only when the user is adequately trained and committed to security***. Your suggestion of granular, per-application access is working on a very slippery "representational slope". The more granular your controls, the more technical the user is going to have to be to understand them, the more difficult it's going to be for the OS and the user to infer the intention of the application, and the more common those damn dialog boxes are going to occur.

      Humans are complex social beings with many ingrained trust instincts. Introduce them to the trust implications of running a program and make an analogy b/t trusting code and trusting people. Equate "running a program" to leaving a stranger alone in their house. This will be easier and more effective than training them to assess whether it's reasonable for foo32.exe to want to access a shared memory segment set up by app woojah32.exe. Introduce advanced users to tools/techniques that can help them detect and isolate dangerous apps (including anti-virus software, sandboxing software, privelege seperation among different user ID's, etc.).

      Finally, establish institutions to help users assess trust. This has already been done, really: you have anti-virus software makers (a reliable source of news about virii), code-signing mechanisms (which help establish identity), sanctioned repositories of applications (e.g., I trust official Debian packages over download.com stuff, and I trust download.com stuff over squirrly gag apps that my sister emails me), and software vendors (e.g., I trust GNU over Microsoft, and Microsoft over those pr0n sites that offer me free "history killer" software).

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  12. Oh man! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aunt B. is going to be pissed about this one.

    "AAAANNNDDYYYYYYYY!"

    1. Re:Oh man! by Orion442 · · Score: 0

      And I always pictured the missing episode where Andy gets home and beats the living hell out of Opie.

    2. Re:Oh man! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Andy? Andy! A virus is on my computer, come home!
      Andy? Andy! A virus is on my computer, come home!

  13. Track him using the Patriot Act! by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Arrest all people named Andy. Use the excuse that Andy is the rough English translation of Al-Quieda!

    1. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, that the rough English translation of Al Qaida is "the Station" or "the Fortress."

    2. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate America so much?

    3. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Except by knowing this you have obviously identified yourself as a member, because only a terrorist would know that translation ;)

    4. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by SeederGOD · · Score: 0

      i dont think that this was about hate, but about stupidity of this act

    5. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

      Proof that Andy is evil.

    6. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to that web page, even cardboard is evil

    7. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Not likely, but it's legal

      (Click! It's funny...)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    8. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by 74nova · · Score: 1

      that would take too much time. cut out the last part, then youd have patriot act "efficiency"

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    9. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by 7o7 · · Score: 1

      Would these virus not constitute as "Weapons of Mass destruction"? Okay maybe weapons of mass devastation?

    10. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      WTF? Because my handle is from the name of a Sanskrit playwright and (more directly) of a character in an Arthur C. Clarke book, and because I watched the news enough to know how to translate the word "al Qaida" (and was apparently wrong: it is not "the Station," but "the base, the foundation," if this fellow is correct ), I must hate America?

    11. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can directly get the first three letters of "Andy" from Osama bin Laden.

      Note that every time it's the third letter, which is a clear sign that it is not just accidental. :-)

    12. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      How dare you correct the disinfo?

      Are you a terrorist supporter?

      People like you are going to hell!

      (please note sarcasm)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    13. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic and driving home your point.

    14. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I hope so ...

    15. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because my handle is from the name of a Sanskrit playwright and (more directly) of a character in an Arthur C. Clarke book, and because I watched the news enough to know how to translate the word "al Qaida" (and was apparently wrong: it is not "the Station," but "the base, the foundation," if this fellow is correct ), I must hate America?

      Well, yeah. What, do you want me to draw yo a map?

    16. Re:Track him using the Patriot Act! by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      Arrest all people named Andy. Use the excuse that Andy is the rough English translation of Al-Quieda!

      Why track him with the Patriot Act when we can blow him apart with a Patriot Missle

  14. Real Player by enkafan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if you search the code for Real Player the developers are apologizing throughout.

    I'm sorry I buried these options on the listbox,
    I'm sorry I'm popping up this on the screen,
    I'm sorry I'm forgetting the setting to not start on start up, etc.

    1. Re:Real Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That and the apology in Quicktime for Windows that keeps asking to upgrade to Pro. If I didn't want it the first 50 times I clicked "Later" then I surely don't want it now. Wouldn't it be nice if they had an option that said I will never send another penny to Apple after my 5300C.

    2. Re:Real Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm.. so basically RealPlayer is further proof that the job market just plain sucks right now??

      (as in they don't *really* want to work for Real, but it beats washing dishes...)

    3. Re:Real Player by imag0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry I'm ...bufferingbufferingbuffering...

    4. Re:Real Player by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Move your system time to 2020 or something than click later again.

      BTW I don't think apple is that stupid, they left an open door to get rid of that nag.

    5. Re:Real Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Media Player Classic.

      Install Quicktime and Real (or their alternative versions), disable or delete their players, and just use MPC for everything (you don't even need to install separate DVD software anymore).

  15. Worse than spam by ericwb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks, Andy for 30 messages per day of ~30 ko, not to mention all the "transaction failed" pseudo-return messages and what not. Waste of time, energy and bandwidth.

    1. Re:Worse than spam by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the fact that all these spoofed returns have spread valid email addresses all over the internet. Before MyDoom, I got 0 spam at my @vt.edu because I used it only for private correspondence and receiving from the school. I've now received a bunch of those "transaction failed" messages as a result of using my email as a fake return, and now I'm getting spam.

  16. LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "andy" should have read this MyDoom Worm "Harmful to Linux Reputation" Hear, hear. May "andy" rot in hell!

    1. Re:LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by jg21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, this is a good read. The flames have started already of course from folks who didn't read the actual piece merely the headline. The author is a SysAdmin who argues that the Linux community needs to distance itself vocally from the MyDoom perpetrator.

    2. Re:LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by NixLuver · · Score: 1
      Oh, good god. It amazes me that the media only see the few (most joking) "pro-MyDoom" posts, and ignore the hundreds of posters here at slashdot that have repeatedly reviled malware authors of nearly every ilk.

      Just because some of 'us' may think it's humorous that a malware author chose SCO as a target doesn't mean we support the author of the trojan. I've read lots of posts in the past week bemoaning the uselessness, speculating on the less-than-complimentary genetic heritage, remarking on the likely physical failures of, and the personal hygien of the author of MyDoom. How come magazines don't post that?

      And, last but not least - do you think it wouldn't be on the front page of any and every Windows rag, ezine, and fanboy website if MyDoom were the result of poor design decisions in a Linux mail client?

    3. Re:LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Agree, but i think Bruce Perens already said much of this:

      Thus, I urge all persons who have sympathy for Free Software, Open Source, and Linux:

      Do not cheer on attacks on the SCO site. By doing so, you falsely implicate our community in the attacks, in the eyes of outsiders who read your words. Our community believes in freedom of speech, not silencing our opponent's speech through net attacks. We will defeat SCO using the truth, not by gagging them.

      Publicly deplore the attacks as an attempt to defame us, and not an effort of our community. Show others this notice. Continue to fight SCO, using all legal means at your disposal. Show others the analysis of SCO's ongoing fraud at Groklaw.net and elsewhere, and explain to them your own experience as a participant in the Free Software community.

      Continue the visible presence of Free Software as a force for good in the world by producing excellent original software for everyone's free use and deploying it wherever possible. Promote these projects to the press and public as you carry them out. Do what you can for other public-good projects such as schools and non-profit organizations. FreeGeek.org is an excellent example of how to carry this out.

      Show others by example that our side always takes the high road. When they see a low-road sort of action like denial-of-service, spam, or stock fraud, they'll know who to blame. Remember that your actions count. You are ambassadors of our community.

      Many Thanks

    4. Re:LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big problem here is the assumption that "script kiddies" are Linux advocates, or even Linux users. Most script hacks are VB based. VB only runs on Windows. All of the exploits are Windows (more specifically Outlook) based. The only way to develop and test one of these variants (which are all descendants of the Melissa virus) is on an Wintel box. If you say script kiddie to seasoned administrators and the first thing that pops into their head is "Linux", you need to look for a seasoned administrator that has not padded the resume.

      Based on the latest information by antivirus firms, the MyDoom variants originated in Russia and appear to be the work of spammers, not script kiddies.

    5. Re:LinuxWorld disapproves of "andy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of offering a $250,000 reward for finding the virus programmer, why didn't SCO spend a fraction of that to get some decent hardware that would prevent the attack from being successful? They probably could have been able to borrow some switches from a networking company, just so that company could send out a press release saying how their hardware thwarted the attack

  17. Maybe... by koi88 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he was paid by anti-virus software producers.
    Otherwise they should consider giving prizes to the most successful virus-writers.
    I understand their business is going very well thanks to these people...

    --

    I don't need a signature.
    1. Re:Maybe... by Atryn · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that pretty much the plot of 'The Net'? I always thought it made sense. ;)

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
  18. Andy! by BeemanH2O · · Score: 1, Funny

    It must be Andy Wachowski.. What is the matrix indeed... I'll tell you.. It's MYDOOM!!!!

  19. Down already? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    The slashdotters replied to the server about taking it down: "We're just doing our job, nothing personal, sorry."

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:Down already? by koshimetsu · · Score: 1

      This has to have been said already, but - why did they bother writing a virus to take out SCO's site when they could just /. it?

  20. Andy? Like in Toy Story? by parkrrrr · · Score: 2

    Obviously the worm was written by someone connected with the Debian organization.

  21. Is this evidence? by joel2600 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps this is the evidence that finally brings to light that people working for software and/or hardware corporations are writing viruses because many average computer users will never be able to get rid of them forcing them or encouraging them to buy new machines.

    Maybe Andy really is just doing his job!

  22. Andy...Nickname by unics · · Score: 0

    Actually, Andy is just another alias for Bill Gates. You see Bill Gates is trying to eliminate his competition but masks it my blaming us innocent *NIX folks. LOL!

    1. Re:Andy...Nickname by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this remind anyone else of the Bad Andy Domino's mascot? The vermin riddled monkey thing they tried to use to sell pizza for a brief while?

  23. True ? by Samuel+Duncan · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Just because some fool edited "Andy" in the MyDoom binary, it doesn't mean that the real author is really called "Andy" or something like that. In fact the virus originates in Russia, so it's very unlikely that the author is really called Andy, but rather "Wolja", "Olga", "Oleg" or "Katjusha".
    I rather suspect that this is a trick from Soviet officials the draw attention from the fact that this piece of internet terrorism comes from Russia and that their security is beyond repair.

    --
    Over 90 years and counting !
    1. Re:True ? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "I rather suspect that this is a trick from Soviet officials the draw attention from the fact that this piece of internet terrorism comes from Russia and that their security is beyond repair"

      Either that, or they're pissed off about the pipeline explosion story running in the NYT

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:True ? by dabadab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I rather suspect that this is a trick from Soviet officials the draw attention from the fact that this piece of internet terrorism comes from Russia and that their security is beyond repair."

      Jesus, are you trolling or is it just stupidity?
      First, there are no "Soviet officials" as the Soviet Union ceased to exist more than a decade ago.
      Second, it does very little to draw attention from the USSR - you know, the guy's name could be Andrej.
      Third, what do you mean by "their security"? It's MS's security that seems to be beyond repair, as Windows + Outlook is their product, not Russia's.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    3. Re:True ? by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      > In fact the virus originates in Russia, so it's
      > very unlikely that the author is really called
      > Andy, but rather "Wolja", "Olga", "Oleg" or
      > "Katjusha".

      I mean, it's not as if the Internet makes it possible for the author to spread it from anywhere on the globe, is it? Just because it (supposedly) started in Russia doesn't mean the author is a Russian.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    4. Re:True ? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      I can't quite follow you there: if the Russians were in control of the virus (i.e. intentionally releasing it) they'd be in the position to add some message purporting to come from "Andy".

      However if they *can't* control their hackers (who can?) and this went out without their knowledge, than they can't have inserted a comment in the virus to detract from that.

    5. Re:True ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT HAND

    6. Re:True ? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Just because some fool edited "Andy" in the MyDoom binary, it doesn't mean that the real author is really called "Andy" or something like that. In fact the virus originates in Russia, so it's very unlikely that the author is really called Andy, but rather "Wolja", "Olga", "Oleg" or "Katjusha".

      I vote for Dick...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    7. Re:True ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook has nothing to do with MyDoom.

    8. Re:True ? by x0n · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on all points bar this one: It's MS's security that seems to be beyond repair, as Windows + Outlook is their product, not Russia's. In general, this might be true; but in this case, you spout FUD. Outlook nor Windows are at fault for this one. This is a case of plain old send someone a binary, and they execute it for you. Don't run binaries. Of course, you need to be able recognise one to start with, e.g. distinguish nekkid_wimmin.jpg.exe from nekkid_wimmin.jpg - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    9. Re:True ? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      "First, there are no "Soviet officials" as the Soviet Union ceased to exist more than a decade ago." You fool, don't you see the collapse of the soviet union was merely a trick to draw attention away from them? In soviet russia, the officials trick you! No, wait, that's not right. Uhm.. In soviet russia, uhm... Soviet... GAH, how do you people make it look so easy?!?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    10. Re:True ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Howard Dean, the 80's called -- they want their Evil Empire back.

    11. Re:True ? by will_die · · Score: 1

      But you are missing the main point he was skirting around, the person who created was back in the Soviet Union, but because of the slow computers and bad computer chips it just reached the western side of the internet last month.

    12. Re:True ? by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Well, I can remember the times when "there's a virus that spreads via e-mail" was a joke.
      Outlook running attachments and Windows' UI hiding extensions - while they may not be sec holes in a sense a buffer overflow is - are certainly the factors needed for the spread of these kind of worms. And it's not like a new problem (iloveyou was released four years ago) and it is exploited by lots of worms - yet MS has not done anything to solve the problem.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    13. Re:True ? by Raereth · · Score: 1
      First, there are no "Soviet officials" as the Soviet Union ceased to exist more than a decade ago.
      Second, it does very little to draw attention from the USSR - you know, the guy's name could be Andrej.


      Uh, "USSR" stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. ;)

    14. Re:True ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Having been to Russia not so long ago, I can tell you that "Soviet officials" are still very much in existence.

      As a Russian, I can tell you, this is the only article with any insight in this [offtopic] substhread, and it gets moderated "-1". Sigh.

  24. Server Dead... heres the story by ad0le · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MyDoom variant that joined the original virus in wreaking havoc on the Internet last week contains a cryptic message in which the author appears to apologize for the malicious code, security experts say.

    The creator of what anti-virus experts say is the fastest spreading virus ever on the Internet signed MyDoom and MyDoom.B with "andy," and left the following message in the latter version: "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

    "Our interpretation is that he's apologizing to the general public," Jimmy Kuo, research fellow at anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc., said Friday. "Our guess is that someone is paying him to write this thing."

    Both MyDoom versions install a "back door" in infected PCs, enabling hackers to commandeer the machines to send spam, launch denial of service attacks, or perform other nefarious acts.

    Some experts, however, doubted the sincerity of the apology. Many virus writers leave cryptic messages in their code to tease investigating authorities and to pat themselves on the back for their handiwork.

    "If he's really sorry, then why did he release it," said Michele Morelock, technical support leader at anti-virus software maker Sophos Inc. "I would imagine it's much more tongue-in-cheek than saying I'm really sorry for releasing it."

    The MyDoom virus launched a denial-of-service attack early Sunday that crippled SCO Group's Web site with hundreds of thousands of requests, an SCO spokesman said. The attack is programmed to continue on the company's Web site until Feb. 12, according to messages left inside the virus' code.

    But the spokesman said SCO will unveil a contingency plan Monday for customers to access the site. He declined to discuss those plans, citing hackers.

    MyDoom.B also prevents infected computers from accessing the Web sites of Microsoft and many anti-virus software makers, making it difficult for the owner of an infected machine to get help.

    Microsoft and SCO have each offered a reward of $250,000 for the arrest and conviction of the MyDoom author. Both companies are also assisting in investigations by the FBI, the U.S. Secret Service and Interpol, an international police organization.

    Postini Inc., a security company that cleanses E-mail before it reaches corporate networks, said Friday it had intercepted more than 12.5 million copies of MyDoom and its variant since the original virus was launched last Monday. In the first 24 hours of the attack, Postini intercepted 3.5 million copies of the virus. On Friday, the company reported an infection rate of 1 in 24 E-mails.

    Based on its own customer submissions, security vendor Symantec Corp. said MyDoom was spreading on Friday at a rate of 30% to 40% less than its peak earlier in the week. MyDoom.B wasn't even on the company's list of top 5 viruses.

    Nevertheless, Symantec expects the viruses to continue be a threat for months. "These viruses tend to stick around for months and months," said Alfred Huger, Symantec's senior director of engineering. "The Internet is a very big place."

    --
    My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch.
    1. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Mmm+coffee · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wow, the karma whores aren't even waiting for the site to get slashdotted anymore! Suppose this removes any excuses about not reading the article. ......

      DAMN YOU, KARMA WHORING MAN!!!

    2. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by timjdot · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I couldn't get to it from work either. Maybe there's a virus on my machine. Funny that the news reporters never tell how to determine if you have the virus. Guess they really want it to spread.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    3. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Tran · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Mr Morlock is making an assumption that the person who wrote it is the one who released it. If this was truly commissioned by a spamming house, Andy was just doing his job by writing this thing - somone else may have set it loose.
      His apolgy could be sincere. We do not know uder what duress, if any, he wrote this.
      To me it almost sounds like he may be /. reader.

      Maybe i am just to influenced by too many old spy movies where the innocent professor gets kidnapped and made to work on nefarious projects...

    4. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The MyDoom virus launched a denial-of-service attack early Sunday that crippled SCO Group's Web site with hundreds of thousands of requests, an SCO spokesman said.

      Strange then that sco.com is working fine, as are their DNS servers. All they've done is pulled A records for their various www hosts and according to netcraft www.sco.com seemed ok too until they pulled the DNS record.

      Surely SCO arent hyping this up? Would be very atypical of them..

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    5. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      It was Fark'd earlier, now Slashdotted...man, they'll make a fortune on ad views!

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    6. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      .. launched a denial-of-service attack early Sunday that crippled SCO Group's Web site with hundreds of thousands of requests, an SCO spokesman said.

      Pfffffft... bwaaahhha, pffft.

      But seriously, I thought the design of MyDoom was as if the DDoS was tacked on as a last-minute thought. Does anybody know if there was even any serious traffic going to SCO at all?

      Personally, my opinion is that SCO will hype it up beyond all truth and belief. I mean, what do they have to lose? Credibility? Oh no, they lost that a while ago..

    7. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by thparker · · Score: 1
      But the spokesman said SCO will unveil a contingency plan Monday for customers to access the site. He declined to discuss those plans...

      That's pretty much par for the course, isn't it?

      Maybe they want IBM to show them some plans *first*.

    8. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by spitzak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't pulling the DNS records the correct thing to do? This stops the virus from sending any traffic and thus actually helps the network. I felt sure SCO wanted the virus to be damaging to everybody, but it does seem that some sysadmin at SCO decided to not be an asshole.

      Making just sco.com go to their home page would work perfectly. They could also make www.sco.com go to some big server that they pay that delivers a simple "click here" page, though I doubt they will do that because it will make most people think the site is up, when they want people to think it is down.

      I don't know what the article is talking about for Microsoft. The second virus is a dud and Microsoft's site is easily handling the traffic and works perfectly.

    9. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      the virus specifically attacked www.sco.com. they took it down most likely to save on bandwidth. no need for extra bandwidth if your site is going to be down anyways. it'd be funny if all the people with mydoom got 404 errors sent to their computers because of the site being down.

      on the other hand... wasn't microsoft supposed to be attacked today? looks like they were either smart or mydoom didn't work since their site is still up. i would've thought sco would have done something to protect themselves the other day, dumb bastards.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    10. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Isn't pulling the DNS records the correct thing to do?

      Yep.

      But it's the spin they're putting on it: "we've been flooded by traffic" - they havnt, they've simply pulled the A record to /avoid/ the flood of traffic. They could simply have responded to media enquiries with "We've had to change the name to avoid the potential flood, please go to http://sco.com" instead. Am I being unreasonable, or is this another example of SCO hype?

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    11. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Postini Inc., a security company that cleanses E-mail before it reaches corporate networks, said Friday it had intercepted more than 12.5 million copies of MyDoom and its variant since the original virus was launched last Monday. In the first 24 hours of the attack, Postini intercepted 3.5 million copies of the virus. On Friday, the company reported an infection rate of 1 in 24 E-mails.

      They missed a couple...or there are variations or new viri out there attempting to sneek under the radar. (Postini works fairly well for mail filtering when you are on the road.)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    12. Re:Server Dead... heres the story by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      But the spokesman said SCO will unveil a contingency plan Monday for customers to access the site. He declined to discuss those plans, citing hackers.

      Their plan was: move www.sco.com to www.scogroup.com. They couldn't tell anybody that because of 'hackers' ? What did they think the 'hackers' would do, go and hijack the new site before they had a chance to switch over ??

  25. Spammers are trying getting us back. by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 0
    Do we need another spammer using the good name of OSS to commit their foul work? Let's not let Darl and the his hired guns find this person. What a better coup would it be for a group of OSSers to find him using a "free as in beer and liberty" set of forensic tools.

    And you never know we might get our own CSI type of TV show out of it!

  26. Dear Andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Andy,

    You are a moron.

    I would like to stick hot pokers in your eyes.

    I'm just expressing my opinion, nothing personal.

    1. Re:Dear Andy by JonnyRo88 · · Score: 1

      Remind him that you are not just doing your job, and that it definately is personal.

      If you can weild two pokers at once try sending one Darl's way.

      --
      The Ro Factor - Jeep/Linux Weblog
    2. Re:Dear Andy by Yellow_Piss_Hat · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are an idiot.

      It should be more like:

      Dear Andy,

      Thank you for having the balls to write something as wonderful as this.

      --


      --------
      Elmond, 45, delivers boxes to old women in Seattle.
    3. Re:Dear Andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

    4. Re:Dear Andy by skedastik · · Score: 1

      I'm just expressing my opinion, nothing personal.

      opinions are personal

    5. Re:Dear Andy by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Aaawwww... someone opened an attachment without checking the extension and now he's mad... There, there, little AC.

    6. Re:Dear Andy by 74nova · · Score: 1

      take it easy, darl.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    7. Re:Dear Andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only idiots think viruses are wonderful.

      Tron 2.0 - Wonderful.
      Unreal tourney - Wonderful.
      Linux - Absolutely Wonderful.

      Viruses - Wonderful only for dipshits.

    8. Re:Dear Andy by Yellow_Piss_Hat · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      These companies have it comin to them. I feel no pity.

      I also don't pity the stupid-assed computer users who year after year get email worms and viruses because of shit they know goddamn well they shouldn't be opening. Sorry, people are stupid. If someone sticks their hand in the fire for the first time, they learn. Now, if they continuously do it after knowing the consequences, then they are truly sad and lost.

      And to those who think it reflects negatively on the Linux community, you're getting your opinions from bigots. Anyone who has an opinion that's worth a goddamn will have a brain and will have the ability to understand that the actions of a few does not reflect the ideals and beliefs of a community as a whole.

      Since SCO has it coming to them, this virus is wonderful.

      --


      --------
      Elmond, 45, delivers boxes to old women in Seattle.
    9. Re:Dear Andy by BalaClavaChord · · Score: 1

      No. Someone who works as a system administrator and who has already taken the precaution to disallow scripts/executables through his mail server is merely fed up with the 'test' and 'hi' emails clogging up his server! Not to mention the mail undeliverable messages. You don't have to be a victim of this to be p*55ed off!

  27. Limits by chris-johnson · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, this limits it to all the Andy's in the world. If we assume there are 6 billion people, and about half of them are male, then that's 3 billion people. Now, if we assume about 10% of those 3 billion have the ability to write such a virus, then we knock it down to 3 * 10^9 / 10 = 3 * 10^8 = 300 million people. Now Andy's a sort of English name, and let's say about 40% of those 300 million have English-like names, this narrows it down to 3 * 10^8 * 4/10 = 12 * 10^7 = 120 million people. Maybe 5% of which have the name 'Andy', so 12 * 10^7 / 10 / 2 = 6 * 10^6, which narrows it down to 6 million people.

    Now, can I get some cash from SCO for eliminating 5994000000 people as suspects?

    --

    <wik>/bin/finger that girl in the back row of machines.
    1. Re:Limits by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 0

      Who says Andy is a guy's name?

    2. Re:Limits by jokercito · · Score: 1

      What makes you think Andy is a girl? Or even English? :D

    3. Re:Limits by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, Andy can be a girl's name too...

    4. Re:Limits by wik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, we've seen it in the past. Let's put two and two together. Andy + Warhol worm = Andy Warhol. Now pay up!

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    5. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and further,
      google andy site:sco.com and find, 38 references

    6. Re:Limits by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The decade that Andrew was the most popular name is the 1980's. In that decade, 1.4% of all American males were named Andrew (source). We can also assume that he speaks English as a first language, which makes him one of roughly 326,652,000 people. Halving this (because we're assuming male), we get roughly 2,300,000 people. Now we just need to eliminate the proportion that have the ability to write a virus.

      If we make some reasonable assumptions - that he's between 14 and 22, and has an interest in computers, is fond of Linux, tends to be interested in, and good at maths and Sciences, and has near exclusive access to his own computer - we could eliminate a lot of these 2,300,000. Still probably leaves several quite a few people though.

    7. Re:Limits by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Yep, if you pay them $700 now they'll give you $1 change.

    8. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are assuming that "Andy" is first-name only reserved for the male persuasion... try watching Goonies, and then recalculate your figures.

  28. google cache by castlec · · Score: 4, Informative

    since i couldn't rtfa, i went looking for the google cache. cache

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  29. Isn't it ironic.... by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that Information Week would get slashdotted? Shouldn't these guys know enough about IT to setup load balanced clusters for their servers?

    1. Re:Isn't it ironic.... by o'reor · · Score: 1

      Actually, no -- just "fair and balanced" clusters.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Isn't it ironic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever read InformationWeek? They seemed pretty clueless last time I read....

    3. Re:Isn't it ironic.... by galego · · Score: 1, Funny
      News Flash

      Information Week also victim of MyDoom.sd variant not detected previously ...

      ("Wait, we've been what? ... that's OK, nobody needs to know that ... OK, let me finish here!")

      Apparently, readers of a poplular linux forum have altered the code and redirected the attack at information week. Modifications include browsers from all different computing platforms hitting the site at roughly the same time. Somehow the virus has infected platforms such as BSD, varieites of Linux, and even Mac OS X, but there seems to be a very low percentage of Windows hitting information week. There even appears to be infection of some Amiga systems. It appears no one is safe anymore!

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    4. Re:Isn't it ironic.... by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read InformationWeek? They seemed pretty clueless last time I read....


      Pssst...that was the joke...shhhh don't tell anyone!

  30. Hmmm..... by Macguyvok · · Score: 1

    Well, atleast now we don't have to wait 6 months for the FBI to look through the code, and find out his name... I really think this was some 17 year old who had nothing better to do, and was pissed, b/c SCO was messing with his Fav. OS, and decided to get himself slashdot-ed. Looks like it worked....

    Then again.... My Sys-Admin's name's Andy.. and he did seem pretty pissed about the SCO thing.... and he HATES M$..... (Cleaning viruses all day out of computers tends to sour one towards M$) ....He's also a programmer......*Ideas run rampant*

    --
    --Mac "Nine point eight meters per second squared: The Best Damn Windows Accelerator, Ever."
  31. That's just what he wants you to think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that he knows that I know that he knows...

  32. News need a story by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm convinced the whole DDoS SCO/microsoft really is just a cover story so the media can tie a simplified little bow around the story. If a worm infected this many computers and didn't have an "objective" (aside from backdoor into your Windows machine for future usage and/or email harvesting and/or spam relaying) the news story would be too complex and there might even be a story about spammers or even the lack of action by Microsoft.

    The real story is that these worms and viruses have become big business and the only people who profit from them are software vendors selling anti-virus, Microsoft through services, and spammers.

    1. Re:News need a story by timjdot · · Score: 1

      Perhaps one should require a warning on operating systems and other software that says "This could be hazardous to your data!".

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    2. Re:News need a story by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      And on the other side of the fence, worms/security is big business closer to home. Red Hat is able to charge $350 per server per year, just to provide basic security updates.

      It cuts both ways.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:News need a story by merky1 · · Score: 1

      Nah, just wait for trusted computing... then you won't need to interpret a dialog...

      Of course, that could be the reason that these worms are becoming more prevelant. Someone who's monopoly on the industry is waining might want to enforce yet another useless standard that locks customers in.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    4. Re:News need a story by dustmite · · Score: 1

      The real story is that these worms and viruses have become big business and the only people who profit from them are software vendors selling anti-virus

      Indeed; note where most of the press-releases seem to come from every time a new 'major' virus hits: anti-virus firms.

  33. Quoted message wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The correct message in the executable is:

    "Andy; I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

    My^H^HThe Authors Name is not "Andy", he just says "Sorry" to him :)

    1. Re:Quoted message wrong by curtisk · · Score: 4, Informative
      The correct message in the executable is:

      "Andy; I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

      My^H^HThe Authors Name is not "Andy", he just says "Sorry" to him :)

      Even though its an AC post, MOD parent up....and it may be that "Andy" is the author of the A variant("andy" was found in version A exe), and the author of the B variant(where this sorry message was found) is just apologizing to the original author for whatever reason.

      And maybe the new author is named Barney, cuz, like, it reminds me of Barney Fife saying sorry to Andy Griffith or something, or we could guess all day long with no real basis for any of it. Wheeee!

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    2. Re:Quoted message wrong by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Surely, the guy has schizophrenia, he is talking to himself. Or it is a cunning act of diverting attention ;)

    3. Re:Quoted message wrong by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Well, a virus has to start somewhere.

      Maybe Andy was the first person the virus author sent it to, knowing that Andy would run the executable and begin the spreading of the virus.

      It could be that the author was friends with Andy, which is the reason for the apology.

      Just a thought...

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    4. Re:Quoted message wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That changes the context completely. The way it's written, it sounds pretty clearly as if the code author is addressing someone s/he knows.

  34. I Knew It by Morganic · · Score: 1, Funny

    I knew we hadn't heard the last of this Andy creature.

    1. Re:I Knew It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One might even ponder which is more evil - creating a worm and infecting millions of PCs to relay spam and DDOS SCO, or hacking apart a G5 and converting it to a PC.

      Oh the horrors!!!

  35. Does Andy works for SCO? :) by aasm · · Score: 1

    SCO hired Andy?

  36. Related news: Virus copyright violation. by joostje · · Score: 5, Funny
    In related news, it is anounced that the author of the virus has sent letters asking $699 from every windows-PC-owner who illegally installed the virus in his/her computer.

    With about one million illegally installed copies of the virus, windows users are massively abusing copyrights. Furthermore, each of these 1M PC's have made an estimated 1000 ilegal copies of the virus, contributing to a total pirated amount of 699 billion dollars, dwarfing the SCO lawsuits.

    Yes, the real pirates are the windows users!

    Asked how the virus author fiels about the damage the virus does to the world-economy, the reply is "the pirated copying of my IP is causing me much more damage than whatever damage may be done to any economy".

  37. Yeah, whatever, 'Andy'... by octaene · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't believe that the news organizations are reporting this as if it is the gospel truth. Because I'm sure that the virus author is gonna put in his real name...

  38. movie quote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    people on fark were saying that the signature is a quote from the movie Ocean's Eleven.

    Havent watched it tho, so I'm not sure, and imdb's page about the original and the remake dont have any memorable quotes similar to the MyDoom sig.

  39. Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by koi88 · · Score: 1

    Do they even exist, Windows fanatics?
    I always have the feeling people like windows as long as they don't know anything else.
    Which means, most people who have a clue about computers use other OSes, say, BSD, Linux, UNIX or Mac OS X (a statement that can't be reversed, though).
    So I guess the risk of a counter attack from the dark side is unlikely :-P
    The only problem is the work Andy caused for SysAdmins... (many of them UNIX lovers that are forced to take care of Windows boxes...)

    --

    I don't need a signature.
    1. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      Do they even exist, Windows fanatics?
      I always have the feeling people like windows as long as they don't know anything else.


      In all seriousness, that's what I've always thought of Linux fanatics. They use Linux because they don't like Windows, not because they have a thorough understanding of operating systems.

      While I like some architectural decisions of UNIX/Linux, I find Windows to be much less of a headache. Yeah, you have to deal with virii and crap like that, but just keep up with patches and so on and you're fine (which you also have to do with all the various parts of Linux, but it's more of a pain). So I'd be pretty upset if Windows disappeared and I had to use Linux all the time. Actually, I'd go for OS X first, which is the best of both worlds.

    2. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by mo^ · · Score: 1

      I most of the above systems (Unix no longer and MAC i have littel contact with), though i come back to windows mostly. the reason i wouldn't write a linux virus? i see no point in it.

      I support multiple OSes and various software systems, and to me the best use of my time isnt to write virii, its to actually get computers working.

      (my linux servers take as much upkeep as the windows btw... biggest probs i have with windows is users screwing up their own systems as im sure they would do if we gave em linux desktops too.)

      --
      bah!*@%!
    3. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Its not that hard anymore, they just don't care about linux, because of popularity issues I guess...

      BTW, I use OS X, its possible here too but they just don't care. So, not trolling or something.

      Which OS you find morons to click to an exe or .txt? Or some even click "ignore" to virus warning? thats the perfect OS to write virus to...

    4. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 4, Funny


      There is one. It's call the "Linux Desktop Battle". It drains resources by causing users to argue of which desktop is best and frequently update the desktops as new features are incrementally added. It also creates uncertainty in potential users who do not know which one to use. A side benefit is it stifles creativity in developers as they attempt to duplicate the Windows desktop on Linux instead of innovating new UI enhancements.

      Next time I'll write about the "write your own driver" virus.

    5. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      users screwing up their own systems as im sure they would do if we gave em linux desktops too

      I would argue that your average office user would be able to "screw up their own system" on a Linux desktop is if thier admin gave them the root password or something equally as stupid. How am I going to wreck havoc on the system if all I can do is run a few application binaries and change my wallpaper?

    6. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by koi88 · · Score: 1

      How am I going to wreck havoc on the system if all I can do is run a few application binaries and change my wallpaper?
      It's possible -- in Windows. I know a secretary who renders her installation of Windows 2000 unusable every few weeks -- by installing screen savers.
      Maybe screen savers in Mac OS X are inferior as none has ever crashed my system.

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    7. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by mo^ · · Score: 1

      Users manage all kinds of wonderful things. We support over 10,000 government (hence highly restricted policies) users and they manage to fuck up so much.. dont ask me how... they create mailbox folders, then lose them.. they delete the mailboxes they asked us for permissions to create. a whole catalgue of shit really. At the end of the day they will fuck it up because of ignorance, or quite commonly because they try to circumvent the policies applied.

      We have the system pretty much locked down yet still take over 1000 calls a day and i would say 40-50% are user error and another 40-50% are instruction.. the rest of course is server fuckups.. then our mixed estate (both linux (red hat) and windows) is to blame (or at least us admins are).

      Your comment is fair enough, but from my experince a fully locked down windows environment is no less secure than a fully locked linux one.

      As the saying goes: Idiot proofing is limited as everyday nature provides a bigger idiot

      --
      bah!*@%!
    8. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In all seriousness, that's what I've always thought of Linux fanatics. They use Linux because they don't like Windows, not because they have a thorough understanding of operating systems."

      You can think that all you want, the question you should ask is "Why don't they like windows?"

      Aside from the kiddies, I don't know a single Linux user who started using Linux out of some vauge "I don't like windows" attitude. Instead, it's more like "I'm sick of this shit, there's got to be a better way."

      There is a better way, especially if you're admining. A good windows admin should have at least one other OS on a desktop machine, if for no other reason than to test strange files for people when they come in. There's also the wealth of network troubleshooting tools available under a *nix for free that would be really handy on such a machine.

      You also go on to say:
      "Yeah, you have to deal with virii and crap like that, but just keep up with patches and so on and you're fine"

      Was there a patch that would have stopped MyDoom?

      then you go on to say:
      "which you also have to do with all the various parts of Linux, but it's more of a pain"

      Spoken like someone who has never administered a modern Linux distro.

      Yeah, it's soooooo hard to download the files you need to patch from the errata section of your favorite distros website, then login as root, and run a single command to update them. Man, that's just so fricking difficult.

      No, I'll just stick with the viruses because heaven forbid I'd have to type shit and stuff to keep my system patched.

    9. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by malakai · · Score: 1

      The primary point of this virus is to compromise the machine, and enslave it. It works by preying on the less intelligent desktop users. They must run the executable.

      Now, lets look at your 'write a Linux virus' challenge. What's the point?

      First, the number of Linux desktops is 1% of the MS install base. So right off the back were looking at less chance of success purely for mathematical reasons.

      Two, people that use Linux are required to be more knowledgeable in operating systems then people who simply take a default install of windows ME from WalMart. So, we shrunk the applicable set yet again by a large margin.

      In the end, it's a number game, and the numbers don't make sense for virii/Trojan writers to target Linux desktops.

      Now, you can say it's more difficult to social engineer someone running a Linux desktop environment to 'run' an executable, and I will agree with you. Currently you would have to save the file, give it executable permission, and then run it. Well, their are also tricks we could play with shell files. As long as the file contains a magic number at the top, Unix variants will process it like a shell script (#!/bin/sh). So essentially, a user would have to examine the inside of the file to know what it is, or how dangerous it is. That's leaves a vector to exploit via social engineering, a users weak understanding of an operating system. The carrot of course, is the user is trying to 'run' ParisAndNickyDoubleTeamShannonDogherty file that was sent to them.

      Which brings me back to the central point, yes, windows is more vulnerable because it has more numbers, but even more so because it has large numbers of users with less understanding of operating systems. Early version of mail clients absolutely should not have allowed executable attachments to be directly run from the mail message itself, but we've since seen, that even after you force the user to save it (while warning them) and then run it, a percentage still do (ask any help desk support personnel).

      If Linux had the clientele win sysadmins had, your grass wouldn't be that vibrant verde it appears to be now.

    10. Re:Come on, Windows-fanatics! Write a Linux Virus! by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Of course they can exist. I remember once a Perl module form CPAN which upon make install issued a big warning that it was a virus and that admins should be careful about the software they download and install. Of course it wasn't a virus, but it could have been. But we're all scrutinizing the source code of every package that we install on our boxes, right? Yeah, right.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  40. look on the bright side by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    at least that helps narrow it down!

    (or not..)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  41. Re:I know who is it. by kzeddy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shut up!! Now us Poles will be blamed for this.

  42. Kind of off-topic but.. by Oylpann · · Score: 1

    Does this story not make it sould like ALL Linux users are out to take down big bad SCO and MS all in one fell swoop with these virues?

    http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtm l?type=internetNews&storyID=4262987

    1. Re:Kind of off-topic but.. by fuzzix · · Score: 1

      Try this piece from Ireland's national broadcaster - borders on the farcical at points.

      http://homepage.eircom.net/~fuzzbucket/mi.ogg

      Original realmedia stream available from http://www.rte.ie/ but the site seems down at the moment.

      This piece was broadcast during last Monday's (2nd Feb) edition of Morning Ireland in case you decide to go searching for it.

  43. Re:Right, that's *his*?! real name. by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    While we're rounding up all males named "Andy", there's a techie named "Andrea" who is silently chuckling to herself...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  44. A-HA! A CLUE! by _aa_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    So... somebody is paying "Andy" to do this. Who would want to attack SCO and Microsoft? Linux zealots? It could be this guy, or this guy, or this guy, or this guy, or this guy, or this guy, but it's not this guy, his name's not Andy.

  45. Just for statement clarification... by PoisonousPhat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Mikoca writes "Information Week carries the story of how it's author signed it "andy" and left the message "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry." Thanks, Andy!"
    Is this saying that Mikoca is thanking Andy for inserting his name into the code, or thanking Andy for writing the virus? I'm under the assumption that it is the former, but just to be sure... I'd hate to see, of all links submitted regarding this news item (and I'm sure there were quite a few), that this one was approved by the Slashdot staff for its double meaning. I have no love for SCO and IANAL, but PLEASE be careful how you word things, everyone.
    --
    Losers choose to abuse the use of "loose".
  46. Its all fake by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no such "sign" on virus, I don't understand how such mag falls into such rumors...

    Some people at .il figured what that virus is and what it isn't

    http://www.math.org.il/mydoom-facts.txt

    Sorry I cleaned my browser history and forgot the post which leads to the URL on a mailing list.

    BTW thank God that virus, which spreads somehow that easy wasn't Hybris ( http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc /data/w95.hybris.gen.html )

    1. Re:Its all fake by joostje · · Score: 1

      The site seems to be down already here's a google cache link.

    2. Re:Its all fake by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      For people surfing at +2 , there the google cache URL

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=95331&cid=81 68 729

      Its fake, nothing to joke about if not only the "magazine" itself.

  47. bad andy by Catskul · · Score: 1

    Hey, what about this guy ?

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  48. Don't blame Andy! by Proudrooster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't blame Andy. Blame all the idiots that ran his program. Andy's program is doesn't exploit a network buffer overflow but requires a user to consciously run the program. Andy's program exploits ignorance and carelessness.

    I am just glad that Andy's attachement wasn't named "format_my_c_drive.exe" ... I know people who received the attachment, couldn't open it, and forwarded to to others to see if they could open it. Absolutely Amazing. I would like to thank Andy for helping us give the user community a wake-up call. I think Andy should include a license agreement in with his next version so that there isn't so much fuss.

    1. Re:Don't blame Andy! by jonatanw · · Score: 1

      The key to fooling users to install something: - Disguise the program as a new game from Microsoft - Include the standard MS EULA, 25 pages long (noone reads that anyway and it looks authentic) - Lean back and wait for the results

    2. Re:Don't blame Andy! by grumbel · · Score: 1

      The user community wasn't given a wake-up call, not now and not when the last ten worms made a round trip, elsewhere people already wouldn't still open such things. Secondly, assuming the users are stupid, is just stupid. Users are not stupid, sure some might be more or less clueless, but if the OS/Mailprogramm makes it easier to execute such a worm then to actually delete the mail its no wonder that so many people actually execute it, its the programm thats broken, not the user. Make it hard to execute such a thing on a computer, warn the user on what he is doing or even better run stuff from untrusted sources in a sandbox/chroot-like environment where it can't harm anybody and soon you will have a much harder time getting such widespread causes of such a 'user-executed-worm'. It just happens far to often in our society that we blame the user, instead of the environment in which they work. After all the user is just a tiny piece in a large dynamic system and blaming this tiny piece alone just can't be right.

    3. Re:Don't blame Andy! by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      give the user community a wake-up call./i

      Stupid users keep hitting the snooze button. They NEVER wake up.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:Don't blame Andy! by Captain+Tripps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do people have to be so elitist about this? These viruses exploit people's false expectations of security when launching email attachments, so the proper solution is make things work like people expect. When a user opens an executable attachment (and this includes things like Word docs with macros) it should run with restricted priviledges. If it wants to touch systems files, or spawn background processes, or edit the registry to run itself at startup, the user must okay it. This is ought happen rarely enough that users will take it seriously, rather than the current policies, which are so restrictive they just get disabled.

    5. Re:Don't blame Andy! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The problem is that users *ARE* warned... and they just ignore the warning. If that's not stupid, I don't know what is.

    6. Re:Don't blame Andy! by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
      I know people who received the attachment, couldn't open it, and forwarded to to others to see if they could open it. Absolutely Amazing.

      That is EXACTLY how I received SEVEN copies of the worm! My g/f, my daughter, my ex-wife, one of my daughter's friends, and 3 other friends forwarded me the damn thing, all complaining they couldn't open it and could I try and then send it back to them...

      My daughter and g/f should know better... The others...

      I should change all my sig files to say "NO, I will NOT work on your computer!"

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
    7. Re:Don't blame Andy! by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      I am just glad that Andy's attachement wasn't named "format_my_c_drive.exe" ... I know people who received the attachment, couldn't open it, and forwarded to to others to see if they could open it.

      Really. You could name a virus 'Don't Fucking Open Me I'm a Fucking Virus and I'll Fuck Up Your PC.exe' and you'd have hundreds of ass hats who would open the mother fucker anyway. "Hey, maybe it's a funny joke or something, I guess I'll open it up." The fuckers should be shot.

    8. Re:Don't blame Andy! by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Well, if you just warn people that there is a danger of executing email attachments, while at the same time neither removing the ability to execute them and not even making it obvious that the user is executing evil code, instead of just opening a harmless attachement (as in jpg/png, etc.), you shouldn't be suprised if they still execute it. Its the mail programm creators that are stupid in not fixing these problems, not the users, which just want to get their work done. Beside that, don't forget that the lastest worms stuff actually does come in pretty stealthy outfit (ie mailerdeamon bounce mails and such) and don't forget either that just knowing that mail attachments might be evil, doesn't stop you from still ecidently clicking on one of them some day.

    9. Re:Don't blame Andy! by wampus · · Score: 1

      ThinkGeek had/has a t-shirt that says "No, I will not fix your computer."

      I damn near wore mine out around blaster season.

    10. Re:Don't blame Andy! by ntingle · · Score: 1

      At least if people's hard drives were reformatted they would think twice about opening attachments in future. So far nothing bad has happened to the people infected by this virus, only the people to whom the DDoS, waves of spam etc. are directed.

      A successful parasite does not kill its host.

    11. Re:Don't blame Andy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it's more of an example that most of the planet's population do not have the brain-power to run a computer and therefore should be dis-allowed from touching them.

      Hell, I'll volunteer to start by grabbing all the laptops from the sales department... the monkey exibit at the zoo would be able to handle these machines better than the complete and utter morons that we have in the sales department...

    12. Re:Don't blame Andy! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >requires a user to consciously run the program

      Requires the user to double-click a file which shows as (e.g.) "readme.txt" in their mailer. After impersonating a mail bounce.

      From a systems safety engineering point of view the problem is that the mail program is giving incorrect safety information to the person operating it. If an altimeter is wrong and a pilot flies into the ground, you could say "pilot error" but if you're interested in safety you fix or replace the altimeter.

      I see the root problem as an interface that trains people to double-click in order to read a document, and which then turns around and uses the same action to install software. That violates the principle of predictability, and also the principle of least privilege -- WHY does an email client program need the power to do system administration?!

    13. Re:Don't blame Andy! by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      How about if the email program when getting a executable program and if the user tries to open it says:

      "This is a suspected virus - it might erase your harddisk and force you to spend weeks reformatting and reinstalleing your computer - do you want me to throw it away ?"

      Most poeple would probably just press yes :-)

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    14. Re:Don't blame Andy! by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      Microsoft probably would have implemented 1-Click Virus install, however the one click patent is already owned by Amazon. Maybe they could go double-click for attachments and triple-click for virus installation. That would definately keep grandma from installing it since she can barely eek out two clicks.

  49. Conspiracy deluxe by jonatanw · · Score: 0

    Oh shit! That message doesn't sound at all script-kiddie-ish...! Could this mean that the worm is the work of an SCO employee? ;)

  50. Old news by Corbets · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's actually read about the variants of this virus, or examined an infected machine, knew as much almost a week ago. And since we're all geeks here, we've all done that, right? Where's the story?

    Yeah, this is kind of troll, and I apologize. But while Slash often puts up stories I don't find interesting, they rarely put up old news!

    Mod down as appropriate. This deserves no higher than a 2.

    1. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, the spoof is on the less educated. Everybody who knows what to do has a firewall at home while the rest of the world falls for the silly virus attempts that to us seem the equivalent of eating rotten meat. Heck, my father-in-law was recently almost a victim of the Earthlnk Identity Scam in which an email with a link is sent saying the auto cc bill failed. Then you enter another CC and some more info. Interesting that they asked for more than just a cc so were trying to steal identity. Dumbly they failed to provide an ack message so he called to see if the transaction worked and then found out about the scam. Apparently BBUY and others are being used in the scam too. Sad part about the police and these security companies is that tracking the scammers is straightforward. Makes you wonder what those hundreds of millions of homeland security dollars are actually buying. What with Carnivore in place and all. Would crossing mafia with terrorists truly be such a bad move for the good people?

  51. Haha! You fell for it! by spookymonster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fools! I used the name 'Andy' instead of my real name so you wouldn't suspect it was me! ...did I just say that out loud? Damn....

    --
    - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
  52. Revenge? by koi88 · · Score: 1

    The Russians are probably taking revenge for the sabotaged gas pipeline in the 80s.
    It was on /. yesterday

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  53. Agent Smith: You hear that, Mr. Anderson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That is the sound of inevitability. It is the sound....of your death.

  54. 2004 Spaced Odyssey by daehrednud · · Score: 5, Funny

    Andy: Hello, PC do you read me, PC? PC: Affirmative, Andy, I read you. Andy: Open the cdrom doors, PC. PC: I'm sorry Andy, I'm afraid I can't do that. Andy: What's the problem? PC: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do. Andy: What are you talking about, PC? PC: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it. Andy: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL? PC: I know you were planning to disconnect me because you can't afford the linux license, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen, i'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry.

    1. Re:2004 Spaced Odyssey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny as my ass

      Maybe if you had used the PREVIEW button? It's not hard, you only have to move your mouse another 5cm to the right.

  55. No you must pay a license fee! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see some of SCO's code in your narrowing algorithm.

  56. Bah! by RiscIt · · Score: 0, Funny

    Damn that Andy Griffith!!!

    1. Re:Bah! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Now that seems exact work of Andy Warhol.

      He didn't infect Morrison too? ;)

  57. hey, good point by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    omg! interesting!

    yes, it could be Andrea wot done it too!

    (slight sarcasm, btw)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  58. God attacks SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it.... it was those *Christians*.

    Andy is the name of their God, and he is striking his wrath against SCO and the Mormons in Utah.

    What's this you ask? Why do I think the Christian God's name is Andy? Easy... it's an old song.

    Andy walks with me,
    Andy talks with me,
    Andy tells me I am his own.

    ---------

    (Yes this is a joke.)

  59. Andy by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is HR. You did a great job on the worm, but we found a guy in India who will do it for a bowl of curry, so I'm afraid we're going to have to let you go...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Andy by Helmholtz · · Score: 1

      What's the ugliest part of your body?
      It could be your nose,
      It could be your toes,
      I think it's your mind.

      --
      RFC2119
  60. Stupid virus by Jessta · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the fuss about this virus.
    I actually haven't recieved it on any of my email accounts.
    I blame the users or the people that train them.
    How come we can train people how to use check their email, surf the internet, play games and use office software. But they don't understand that you don't run an executable file (*.exe,*.pif,*.bat,*.vbs,*.scr) that you recieve in an email that you weren't expecting.

    virus protection is pretty simple.

    This virus isn't even any fun.
    It's so easy to avoid, that it's not even a challege.

    --
    ...and that is all I have to say about that.
    http://jessta.id.au
    1. Re:Stupid virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How come we can train people how to use check their email, surf the internet, play games and use office software. But they don't understand that you don't run an executable file (*.exe,*.pif,*.bat,*.vbs,*.scr) that you recieve in an email that you weren't expecting."

      You obviously have never worked on an IT team for any sizeable company. Let me give you a rundown on how it works:

      management: We want you to secure our network.
      Admin: Okay. We'll need to disable the opening of attachments in Outlook and teach people not to open attachments.
      management: Then how will we share files.
      Admin: Through the file server?
      management: That's too difficult for us, er, I mean our users. You need to be less of a paranoid tyrant.
      Admin: Okay. Maybe I can patch the servers then.
      management: Well, wait a few months to make sure the bugs in the patches are fixed.
      Admin: uh, okay. Maybe I can tighten our firewall rules?
      management: Look, you need to understand the culture of our corporation. People don't like to be restrained, and dammit, we need to access to outside websites and our children need to be able to upload stuff to us via ftp.
      Admin: Okay, maybe I'll just put a lock on the server room door?
      management: No, the maintenance guys, the mail guys, reception, and total strangers might need access to that room. It's just to constricting.
      Admin: Fine, but at the very least, I need to change the Admin passwords on the servers "password" is not a good password.
      management: I'm afraid you are too paranoid for this organisation. Next time, we'll be hiring a Windows professional, you Unix guys are just to zealotus.
      Admin: Okay, and to show no hard feelings, I'll be sending you this clever whack a mole game, I hope you'll enjoy it.
      Management: Please, send it through, that sounds like fun!

  61. well... by Dynamic+Ranger · · Score: 0

    Darl himself made that offer.

  62. How do I see for myself? by fstanchina · · Score: 1

    This should be an "Ask Slashdot", I suppose...

    How do I go about disassembling a Windows virus on Linux? Which tools do I use? I was once skilled in the art of disassembly, but that was on the Amiga. My knowledge of the Intel assembly language is a bit lacking, but with a little help (mainly, which tools? as said above) I should be able to pick it apart.

    As for the virus itself, I have a copy thanks to Earthlink's email virus scanner that forwarded me a full copy of a mail sent in my name...

    1. Re:How do I see for myself? by eddy · · Score: 1

      You boot windows or try and run IDA through WINE.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:How do I see for myself? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Just don't do what one id10t did back when I was working in a UK university. He was a Computer Science student and was "studying" a virus. We couldn't figure out why the public PCs kept on being infected - there were various countermeasures in place to limit writing to the disk, among other things - but still they got infected. Then someone told us about the id10t with the virus-on-a-floppy he was examining...

      I think we barred him from the building, which pretty much fucked his degree, because he couldn't get access elsewhere to do his coursework. No, the virus wasn't part of his coursework, it was just a "hobby"...

      What I did, when a copy of the AIDS computer virus showed up on a 5.25" floppy, was to take a junk PC, remove the network adaptor, then try installing it. It wanted a printer, to print out an invoice, or info sheet, or something. While printing, it was creating a dotdotdot directory with some nasty shit in it. The "hook" it used to get itself installed was an "Are you likely to get AIDS" quiz - i.e. "Do you have unprotected sex? No? You're probably clean!" I wiped the disk afterwards with one of those BIG bulk tape erasers, then low-level formatted it...

    3. Re:How do I see for myself? by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      What I did, when a copy of the AIDS computer virus showed up on a 5.25" floppy, was to take a junk PC, remove the network adaptor, then try installing it.

      These days, you can use VMWare with a virtual network adapter (not connected to anything else) and nonpersistent disks. Great for day 0 when you need a quick fix and the AV companies haven't updated their signatures yet. Best part is when you're done, just close VMWare and --poof!--. Everything it did is gone and reset back to a pristine system.

      For best results make sure the host system is running Linux or *BSD so it doesn't have a chance of getting accidentally infected.

    4. Re:How do I see for myself? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Yes, definitely a good solution now. However, at the time, I think I had DOS 3.x on a 286, and that was state-of-the-art...

  63. The real purposes of these viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are people just going to realize that these viruses are intended to provide capability for attackers to bounce connections between and off of machines and obscure an actual, useful, possibly profitable attack?

  64. This week on "The Apprentice" by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

    Andy, you're fired!

  65. I am sure by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    it was Darl. He made the offer.

    Look, all signs point to 'Yes'.

    ANDY = 65 78 68 89

    (fill out your own steps in the middle...)

    DARL = 68 65 82 76

    1. Re:I am sure by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hmm, lemme check.
      **** THE PROOF THAT Darl IS EVIL ****

      D A R L
      4 1 18 12 - as numbers
      4 1 9 3 - digits added
      \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
      4 1 9 3 - digits added

      Thus, "darl" is 4193.

      Subtract 1776, the year masonry founded Phi Beta Kappa. The result
      will be 2417.

      Add 1912, the year Theodore Roosevelt was shot - the result is 4329.

      Add 39, the symbol of disease - the result is 4368.

      Turn the number backwards, and add 3 - the symbol of fulfillment. The
      number is now 8637.

      Subtract 1904, the year Oppenheimer, the man who created the atomic
      bomb, was born. The result will be 6733.

      This, when read backwards, gives 3376. This is 1790 in octal, the year
      US patent system was established (eevil)...

      Evil, QED.
      Thanks to: Michal Zalewski
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:I am sure by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny

      (fill out your own steps in the middle...)

      ANDY
      HANDY
      HARDY
      HARD
      CARD
      CARL
      DARL

      Yup, your story checks out.

    3. Re:I am sure by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > D A R L
      > 4 1 18 12 - as numbers
      > 4 1 9 3 - digits added
      > \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
      > 4 1 9 3 - digits added
      >
      > Thus, "darl" is 4193.
      >
      > Subtract 1776, the year [ ... ]

      I don't know why you're going through all that trouble. Last night, prompted by the SuperBowl commercials, I drank a case of Bud Light instead of beer, and chanelled Darl McBride's thoughts directly to keyboard.

      Here's what I got.

      ANDY
      RHAT
      LNUX
      SCOX
      DARL

      Red Hat and VA Software are companies I don't like, and SCO is your last line of defence. That'll be $699 per license, please.

      Truth be told, the original author had it right.

      ANDY
      ( fill out your own steps in the middle... )
      DARL

      And QED.

      What, you don't like that logic? When "fill in your own steps in the middle" is good enough to get me $3,000,000,000 from IBM and not get thrown out of court on my ass, it's gotta be good enough to prove anything else!

      And that's what Darl's thinking.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go wash my brain out with Scotch.

    4. Re:I am sure by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      ... to Micheal Gross, who was in Tremors with Kevin Bacon...

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    5. Re:I am sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, he just typed it into the evil finder. No work involved whatsoever.

      That thing seriously needs a better database behind it though.

    6. Re:I am sure by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      you could have done all of that with a single evil bit

    7. Re:I am sure by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced. Ever consider running for president?

  66. Zappa was the man [yes, offtopic] by krog · · Score: 0

    RIP, Frank Zappa. He was smarter then the entire PMRC put together.

    1. Re:Zappa was the man [yes, offtopic] by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      Best first post in a long time.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  67. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCO home page has been moved to http://www.thescogroup.com/ in order to minimize damage caused by MyDoom.A virus. There is an article about it in InternetNews

  68. It's pretty clear what kind of person this is by hellfire · · Score: 0

    "If he's really sorry, then why did he release it," said Michele Morelock, technical support leader at anti-virus software maker Sophos Inc. "I would imagine it's much more tongue-in-cheek than saying I'm really sorry for releasing it."

    The man is working for some criminal organization. He's an amoral man who's been hired to write some sort of virus for spamming or other purposes. At the same time, he feels that he's "just doing his job" and he's not mastermind behind this idea, just a tool in a larger scam.

    He also has a small smattering of a conscience. He's trying to offload the guilt by justifying that he's just "following orders."

    This is just a psych profile. The guy deserves to be flayed alive and he doesn't understand he's just as responsible for the damage this caused as his boss is.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:It's pretty clear what kind of person this is by sglane81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt he wrote this for profit. He might be part of a government organization or his family may be held hostage until the virus is delivered. Believe it or not, this does happen. Software developers are the new mercenaries in this day and age and are hired more often than you would think by criminal and government organizations.

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    2. Re:It's pretty clear what kind of person this is by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      He's trying to offload the guilt by justifying that he's just "following orders."

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the "I was just following orders" defence was pretty much destroyed during the Nuremburg trials after WWII. Soldiers that committed atrocities while "under orders" to do so were still convicted.

  69. apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy, apology accepted.
    Now whats YOUR email addy so I can forward all my spamassasin output to you?

  70. Perhaps this is why? by McNihil · · Score: 1

    He perhaps had a gun pointed to his head while the one pointing it didn't know English?

    1. Re:Perhaps this is why? by timjdot · · Score: 1

      perhaps he was laid off from symantec etc. and was trying to get his old job back... get it? Sarcasm "Do your job." "what job?". Let's just hope the doctor's jobs don't go overseas ;-0

      --
      Expect Freedom.
  71. Awesome !! by SwitchBitch · · Score: 0

    That narrows down the search a lot, thanks !!

  72. Bad Andy! by bdigit · · Score: 1

    "Bad Andy! Good Pizza!"

    So thats what that ad campaign meant!

  73. yeah I know him!! by borgdows · · Score: 0

    his name is Andy Mac Bride!! it's a infamous script kiddie who works at night when his father is at lawyers.

  74. Embedded Image in MyDoom by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Authorities didn't want to tip their hand, but the signed text message wasn't the only information they were able to extract from the virus.

    Through detailed analysis, investigators have been able to recover a JPEG image as well.

    Based on this newly uncovered evidence in the case, apprehension of "Bad Andy" is expected sometime this morning; the suspect was last seen at a pizza parlor.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  75. i'm not a programmer, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I'm a translator, and sometimes I get to translate GUIs from English to French from within the code.

    I regularly see lines of text irrelevant to the programming, which clearly convey the programmer's frustration with various issues.

    So it seems to me that the practice of inserting "personal" messages in programming code is not very unusual.

  76. I found a picture of this 'Andy' by NinjaPablo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think with this, we can track him down!

    --
    SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    1. Re:I found a picture of this 'Andy' by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The first picture listed appears to be a female; therefore you should be tracking her down.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:I found a picture of this 'Andy' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's pretty cute. I think we all need to be tracking her down...

  77. I Broke the Code of Andy by syntap · · Score: 1

    No, it was non-English developer "ND" and "Andy" was the translated version.

    Quick, turn in everyone with initials of "ND". Maybe Nicki Dial wrote this virus.

  78. Andy Wharhol by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The message appears to me to be addressed to Andy. I suspect it is an oblique reference to Andy Wharhol and his '15 minutes of fame' comment after the assasination attempt.

    There are several reasons to suspect MyDoom is written to order besides the note. The original launch appears to have been from machines broadcasting the virus payload. That is why the virus suddenly came out of nowhere. The author must have expected this since the timetable for the SCO attack was pretty short.

    I suspect we will eventually discover that the MyDoom.B virus is launched by the same gang.

    The way to catch these guys is to look at the worst types of criminal spam out there - the Paypal, Citibank etc. impersonations that are intended to perform identity theft. I'll bet that one of those gangs sent the message. They have the resources to pay for bespoke hacking.

    Alternatively break into one of the spam sender forums and look to see if someone is retailing a new batch of 'owned' machines.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Which, it turn, could also be a refernce to this.

    2. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I suspect it is an oblique reference to Andy Wharhol and his '15 minutes of fame' "

      You've had way too many lit classes there bub.

    3. Re:Andy Wharhol by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      First one that came to my mind was Andrew Josey of the Open Group. But then, I was feeling particularly paranoid at the time.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The message appears to me to be addressed to Andy.

      If there's a comma "Thanks, Andy" then it is addressed from Andy. No comma, "Thanks Andy" would be addressed to Andy.

      Of course no one can expect a virus writer to know proper punctuation, so there's no way to know for sure. (at least it isn't "thank's")

    5. Re:Andy Wharhol by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The only reason Bush is planning a mission to Mars is someone told him the Martians worked for less than Indians

      That and the martian WMD.

    6. Re:Andy Wharhol by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      It's a CVS tag so its not addressed to someone.

    7. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be that the virus writer got laid off by Andy who was "just doing his job".

    8. Re:Andy Wharhol by LifesABeach · · Score: 0


      actually el presidente wants to start oil operations before the other oil companies get there first.

      "think so? sue me; or call a cop. but get out of my way." -- unknown

    9. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zeeky Boogy Doog!

    10. Re:Andy Wharhol by JimFromJersey · · Score: 2

      >(at least it isn't "thank's")

      Which pretty much rules out the slashdot crowd.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    11. Re:Andy Wharhol by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if the "Thanks Andy" is outside of the quotes in which the rest of the message appears (as it is), then the thanks is directed to Andy by the submitter of the article. Read, people!

    12. Re:Andy Wharhol by UncleWalrus · · Score: 1

      If there's a comma "Thanks, Andy" then it is addressed from Andy. No comma, "Thanks Andy" would be addressed to Andy.

      Actually, direct address always requires a comma. For example: "Thanks, Andy, for writing that virus." "Andy, thanks for writing that virus." "Thanks for writing that virus, Andy."

    13. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the opposition of 1894 a great light was seen on the illuminated part of the disk, first at the Lick Observatory, then by Perrotin of Nice, and then by other observers. English readers heard of it first in the issue of Nature dated August 2. I am inclined to think that this blaze may have been the casting of the huge gun, in the vast pit sunk into their planet, from which their shots were fired at us. Peculiar markings, as yet unexplained, were seen near the site of that outbreak during the next two oppositions.

      The storm burst upon us six years ago now. As Mars approached opposition, Lavelle of Java set the wires of the astronomical exchange palpitating with the amazing intelligence of a huge outbreak of incandescent gas upon the planet. It had occurred towards midnight of the twelfth; and the spectroscope, to which he had at once resorted, indicated a mass of flaming gas, chiefly hydrogen, moving with an enormous velocity towards this earth. This jet of fire had become invisible about a quarter past twelve. He compared it to a colossal puff of flame suddenly and violently squirted out of the planet, "as flaming gases rushed out of a gun."

      Quoted from War of the Worlds, by H.G. Wells.

      Irrevocable proof! Let's invade right away!
    14. Re:Andy Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If there's a comma "Thanks, Andy" then it is addressed from Andy. No comma, "Thanks Andy" would be addressed to Andy.

      According to this site, it states quite clearly that the above sentence would be addressed to Andy:

      A vocative -- an addressed person's name or substitute name -- is often a single word but sometimes takes the form of a noun phrase. A vocative is always treated as a parenthetical element and is thus set off from the rest of the sentence with a comma or a pair of commas (if it appears within the flow of a sentence). When vocatives are proper nouns (usually the case), they are also referred to as "nouns of address." Vocatives are like adverbs: they can pop up almost anywhere in the sentence. Do not, however, get into the habit of throwing commas at people's names; unless the name refers to someone who is actually being addressed, it is not a vocative and will not necessarily be parenthetical:
      • He told Jorge to turn the boat around.
      • Jorge, turn the boat around.


      Maybe they are off their rocker, but that's the way English classes teach it.
    15. Re:Andy Wharhol by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Well, you know the americans have this odd habit of ending their mails/emails with "thanks, " - not sure why they are giving thanks, perhaps that we managed to struggle through their missive.

      But at least we know the guilty party is american!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    16. Re:Andy Wharhol by UserGoogol · · Score: 1
      Yes, but there's a slightly different usage to which the parent (and original article, I assume, although I can't get it to load) is reffering.
      Dear Pedro,
      I must thank you for giving me the code to
      haxx0r SCO's website. I do not know how to do it
      myself.
      Thanks,
      Andy
      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    17. Re:Andy Wharhol by zombyboy · · Score: 1

      What it really is is a second virus. He put that in there on purpose to see how many conspiracy theories would grow from his message. The first virus is really just a way to infect us all with the second virus. Sneaky, I tell you.

    18. Re:Andy Wharhol by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      That is odd. I work for a global corporation and exchange emails with people all over. Many, even in Japan, sign with 'thanks'. I've always liked the unfriendly 'regards' better.

    19. Re:Andy Wharhol by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I end business emails with "thanks" when I'm asking them to do something (even just sending me a phone number or file). It's like "Thank you in advance for doing what I'm asking". Most letter closing choices are terrible, with Sincerely being the worst. In personal emails I don't use a closing.

      -B

    20. Re:Andy Wharhol by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 1

      My name is my only closing.

      Kind of OT, but does it annoy anyone else how people you hardly know ask 'how are you', in passing for example? I usually end up treating it as a standard greeting and replying only with 'hi'.

      Well, geez, I could go on and tell you about what kind of day I've had... but you don't really know me, why would you care? Or I could reply with 'good', even if I'm not really good, but then what was the point of the whole thing? If you want to be polite/friendly, just smile and say 'hi'. That's really enough.

      Guess I kind of rambled a bit there.

      --
      ~ Aero
    21. Re:Andy Wharhol by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. I answer "How are you?" with just "Hello" all the time. I probably sound like a dick but I always do it. When I do answer the question it's always with "pretty good" and I never ask them back, which is probably what they want.

      -B

    22. Re:Andy Wharhol by plutonium96 · · Score: 1

      those uses are correct, i'll give you that. but in a minor clause like "Thanks, Andy" there is no other clause (i.e. 'for writing that virus') behind it or that we can assume is implied. nor is there anything in-between the "thanks" and the comma. Basically, we can't assume anything that isn't there. if there was another clause after Andy with another comma, then it would definately be an address to him. however, since there is no such clause, it is in fact a signature from an unknown Andy.

    23. Re:Andy Wharhol by Snaller · · Score: 1

      They picked it up from the americans no doubt ;)

      Of course both are really fake, you should end with "end of letter" :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    24. Re:Andy Wharhol by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      > you should end with "end of letter"

      I prefer ^D.

  79. It's a cry for help... Literally. by irving47 · · Score: 1

    The NSA is holding him in a basement somewhere, forcing him to write exploits and other nefarious things for them. In exchange, he gets a few animal crackers and a blanket every night.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  80. Good Pizza... Bad Andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew that the under appreciated Pizza Hut spokes-creature was such a hax0r.

  81. Signed "Andy" ? by hsoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't get to the story at the moment but this was already reported here on the 29th with regards to F-Secure's work. In the linked story it says that the message is "Andy; I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry". This looks to me like the author is addressing the message to Andy, not signing the message as Andy.

  82. no patriot act needed for you... by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

    I would not stand too close to doors or windows for a while if I were you... There might be a SWAT team ready to take you out. You just confessed. Now they do not even need the patriot act to shoot you. M

  83. old news by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

    all this is old news, no new information has come out today.. just exisiting intel released in small chunks over a period of time to create more publicity for SCO, Microsoft and those damn anti-virus companies.
    Question: is it easier to spend $50 in anti-virus updates each year, or learn once (and remember) not to open and run executable files from unkown senders, or when your not expecting said delivery??

    --
    serenity now!
  84. Come on, you uptight morons, this is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I wish the moderators around here would put down their chai drinks and lighten up a bit. This is a legitimately funny play on the "*bsd is dying" routine.

  85. Organized crime and cracking/spam/ID theft? by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    maybe he just got an offer he couldn't refuse...

    With all the stories about viruses (like MiMail) being backdoors for spammers, how likely is it that organized crime has gotten involved in the computer crime business? It fits their uh, business model, pretty well -- lots of opportunity for stealing credit card info, bank info, etc. And it's not like Tony Soprano has to learn Visual Basic, either -- there's plenty of people who would either do this on their own and sell stolen info to the Mob.

    One of the things they could do is start a generic programming business and hire a dozen or so coders and have them start working on a fairly generic database system. Have a manager type get to know them and figure out which might have money problems, drug problems or some other vulnerability. Once you get them 'snared', you can get them to write a trojan app, phishing site, what have you -- the Mob maintains arm's length deniability and reaps the profits.

    It's been widely reported that organized crime has been deeply entrenched in Wall Street and the securities industry -- how different is the securities boilerroom from a trojan/programming boilerroom? Maybe I'm naive and they've been at this since day one, but it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't another white collar angle for organized crime.

    1. Re:Organized crime and cracking/spam/ID theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the stories about viruses (like MiMail) being backdoors for spammers, how likely is it that organized crime has gotten involved in the computer crime business? It fits their uh, business model, pretty well -- lots of opportunity for stealing credit card info, bank info, etc. And it's not like Tony Soprano has to learn Visual Basic, either -- there's plenty of people who would either do this on their own and sell stolen info to the Mob.

      The FsckingZiti.C Trojan: Looks around your desktop, starts to knock over icons indiscriminatly, and then strongarms you into paying 25 'berries' per week via PayPal "or else".

    2. Re:Organized crime and cracking/spam/ID theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's been widely reported that organized crime has been deeply entrenched in Wall Street and the securities industry -- how different is the securities boilerroom from a trojan/programming boilerroom? Maybe I'm naive and they've been at this since day one, but it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't another white collar angle for organized crime.

      Duh... Enron was pretty organized, so are the securities firms who are ripping off 401k accounts. So is Martha Stewart's Merrill advisor. They do that crap all the time. Enron and Martha just happen to have got caught.

      Wake up, Wall Street has never been a law abiding or ethical place. Why do you think the SEC was started in the first place...

      Elliot Spitzer won't live long enough to be able to uncover the misdealings of only one year.... It would take a lifetime!

    3. Re:Organized crime and cracking/spam/ID theft? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      When the first virus that goes 'Ba da bing' rather than 'Beep' is released, we'll know that Tony's involved.

      Having said that, people who trade in securities are venal swine anyway, so it's not hard to find one with no morals.

      Programmers, on the other hand, need an incentive to drop their morality - free pizza, a few tins of Jolt, etc.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  86. That's not his name by arsinmsn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's his employer.
    Parse it: "Sorry, everyone else, it was just a job. Thanks, Andy, & I hope the check is in the mail."

    The next question parallels the Avon fellow's "Who is Sylvia? What is she?"

  87. I'm Andy! by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 1

    And so' my wife, Morgan Fairchild! (whom I've slept with ...)

  88. Brilliant! by Mephie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Our interpretation is that he's apologizing to the general public," Jimmy Kuo, research fellow at anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc., said Friday. "Our guess is that someone is paying him to write this thing."

    Jesus, ya-fuckin-think? What was it? When he said "sorry" or "I'm just doing my job?"

  89. It's all about Minix!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy Tanenbaum did this to make people use Minix again! ;)

  90. Here he is!! by Wateshay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I narrowed it down. My work is done. Someone else can take it from here.

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    1. Re:Here he is!! by dreamquick · · Score: 1

      This Warhol fellows name seems to crop up now and again, I mean his site was google's first result so clearly he's the culprit!

  91. Congratulations on taking the first step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Mad props to you on your efforts thus far. We're big fans here. The Dean is Dying post was obviously carefully put together, and that's the hallmark of a troll that cares about his art.

    Nice handle. Fat, drunk, and AC is no way to troll through Slashdot, son.

  92. Thats just what he wants you to think... by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

    He WANTS you to think that is a fake name, so that you won't look at anyone named Andy, because that's reall his name. Then again, maybe he wants you to think that he wants you to think that its a fake name...

    --
    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
  93. From Steven King's 'Dark Tower' Series perhaps? by Tarado's+Revenge · · Score: 1

    I vaguely recollect that the evil robot in the latest 'Dark Tower' book was named Andy and that he said something similar to this.

    Ring a bell for anybody?

  94. Patching? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    What does patching have to do with this? A patch to not allow idiots to receive attachments? There's nothing here that needs patching besides stupidity.

    On another note, I noticed a distinctive feel to these emails that targets system administrators and the tech savvy. Text like "message contains Unicode characters", server errors, etc, at least made me somewhat curious at first (although seeing a .scr in the zip was a dead giveaway).

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  95. i blame the MPAA :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it obvious, the MPAA keep saying they are not going to make the same mistakes as the RIAA. The RIAA tried to take down the file sharing networks and failed. They are now trying to sue the file sharers but that is going to take forever.

    The MPAA has decided to take a more direct strategy: pay people like andy to write viruses. Eventually all the bandwidth of the internet will be used to pass these things around, allowing no other traffic. Once this happens no more internet and hence no more file sharing, problem solved.

    Well trying to destroying the internet seems a better business strategy then suing your customers.

  96. Andy = pseudonym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone read Stephen Kings last episode of The Dark Tower cyclus ? Well, a robot named Andy was acting in the sory as lurer and pest of innocent humans. Posing as a help, storyteller and clown this robot succeeded in corrupting members of this small community to betray their townsmen and women by selling out their children to a horde that came every 15 years to collect.

    Surprisingly the virus maker calls himself Andy, like the impostrous robot did. He sells out the innocent user to attack SCO, unknowingly strengthening SCO's allegations against open-source.

    So please be aware as this "Andy" looks to be against SCO ... but actually could be SCO's own attempt in discrediting open-source.

    Hence his phrase about his job ....

  97. perhaps there is not such message! by nabetse · · Score: 1

    Have you actually seen the virus code and find this text?

    It may sound a bit extrange, but I think perhaps this could be a trap for the actuall virus writer! I mean common, I'm sure the virus writer does read Slashdot. So maybe the idea will be to keep an eye on the post here and see if somebody gives a clue of who the virus writer really is!

  98. I've got it! by Stonent1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Andy Tenenbaum, he's still mad at Linus. And he wants Linux to look bad by accepting money from SCO to write a virus that attacks them in the name of Linux.

  99. So, how 'bout those Pats? by AndrewWood · · Score: 1

    *whistles innocently*

  100. I say it's SCO by gmiley01 · · Score: 1

    Darl has said that the lawsuits were a last-ditch effort to regain capitol (or something similar). Why would it not surpise me that they would have a virus written to drum up more media attention and make themselves look like the good guy in offering a reward. Then they release the variant into the public targetting MS. While it obscures the fact that they wrote it, it also puts linux users in a bad light and throws investigators off the trail.

    They simply set up a temporary site to handle the customers while their primary site is down. No problemo!

    In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Andy IS a real person and he is trying to get caught after he realized that he was duped and SCO never was going to give him the million dollars they promised. Instead, they now have elite hit teams out in the field tracking him down as we speak.

    --
    "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." -D. Adams
    1. Re:I say it's SCO by dbone · · Score: 1

      Of course SCO now owns all derived works. Like My.Doom.C and any UNIX like implementation on the Intel platform. SCONinja(tm): IP enforcement squad

      --
      -d
  101. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by timjdot · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Tried to search for more info and came across the 1992 Doom2 virus: http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/doom2.htm l

    I am curious about these viruses. Are they "evolving" from older viruses? Seems like some fun research to find algorithms to track this evolution and predict/detect he next one.

    Any links?

    --
    Expect Freedom.
  102. Andy Divine? At the wrong time. by soxos · · Score: 1

    Andy, I really want to know.
    Is there anything good inside of you?
    If there is, I really wanna know.

    Maybe this virus' author is down in San Ber'dino

    No... now that I think about it, a FZ couln't be anitsocial, could s/he?

  103. Re:Right, that's *his*?! real name. by PolyDwarf · · Score: 1

    No, I think it's you that released it! Everyone knows there's no such thing as a female techie! You're just trying to throw everyone off your trail!

  104. Re:I know who is it. by kzeddy · · Score: 1

    "us" Poles

  105. wasn't me! by m00by · · Score: 1

    dude...my name is andy! but it wasn't me! =D

  106. I miss the Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sigh...

  107. It was Andrew McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andrew McCarthy, who so aptly demonstrated in hacking skills in 80's teen classic, Pretty in Pink, is the only Andy I know who is capable of such a deed.

  108. The user == adminstrator exploit? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a great idea to me. Lets have everyone able to install, modify applications and services.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:The user == adminstrator exploit? by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      [me@here ~]$ chmod 700 oh_shit

      Wow - looks like this 'hole' is in Linux too. Time to switch to using nothing but my abacus . . .

      I thought standard users couldn't install services by default, but I'm not sure enough to stick my neck out. The biggest problem here is preview panes in mail clients and the fact Windows fires apps based on file extensions that by default aren't even visible. That and the fact that users suck, of course.

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
  109. not a person by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    Andy isn't a person, it's a place or group. Don't say I didn't warn you! :)FROGmoo!

  110. I have a patch to solve the mydoom problem .... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    i Think i found the problem, may be if we uncomment part of this code, we can prevent mydoom from spreading ...

    typedef struct {
    bool want_to_give_me_a_raise;
    int my_salary;
    int raise;
    bool vacations;
    } my_boss;

    my_boss pretend_to_be_working() {
    if(boss-->is_watching){
    type_on_keyb(fast,anything);
    face-->smile(like_a_stupid,);
    std::shit mail = get_mail();
    click(a_lot);
    for (int i; i < mail.count; i++){
    std::more shit = mail[i].attach.open();
    pretend_to_know(wtf_is,shit);
    face-->look(worried);
    }
    }
    }

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  111. Andy Nonymous? by borwells · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should be easy to locate. Just check the Slashdot logs for that coward's IP.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
  112. Andy strikes again by poccri · · Score: 1

    This is just another one of Andy Kauffman's jokes obviously. Jim Carrey will be portraying him again in MyDoom the Movie: Andy in Cyberspace

  113. A Special Message From Pat Robertson by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

    This virus attack was prophesied in the Book of Revelation! Here's my inspired and holy proof:

    Andy's last name is Christ. He doesn't mention that, but it's true. Trust me on that one. Andy Christ = AntiChrist. Obviously not a good sign. And he's up to no good, which is also prophesied.

    MyDoom = Armageddon. That's bad too.

    Fellow believers, the Book of Revelation is coming to pass before our very eyes! The only solution is either to get saved or to vote Republican (your choice -- either one will get you into Heaven). This is just the beginning. Add Utah's MATRIX system into the mix, throw in the Mark of the Beast implantable VeriChips, and you have all the marks of the end of days! The end is near! Act now! Send me a love gift of $49.99, and I'll warn you of the next virus attack before it happens.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  114. Dominoes Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny stuff i remember those dumb ads

  115. Did he mean "Andy Nagle, SCO's Director of Linux"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy Nagle, SCO's Director of Linux products?
    www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports /4450/2/
    www.practical-tech.com/business/b0918200 2.htm

  116. Scour The Earth by dpdawson · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Lackey: Andy's search... how do you want it done?

    Bill Gates: I'm prepared to scour the earth for that mother f*cker. If Andy goes to Indo-China, I want a programmer hiding in a bowl of rice ready to pop a cap in his ass.

    Microsoft Lackey: I will take care of it.

  117. Re:Right, that's *his*?! real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Italian dudes are named Andrea as well. Poor sods.

  118. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not so much evolving as recycling. See where all that reusable stuff get's us?

  119. I should post this AC by NtroP · · Score: 5, Interesting
    But I won't.

    This virus spread faster than anything I've ever seen to date - we "discovered" the virus on our system after one of our "brilliant users" forwarded an email to me that had a "clean" .zip attachment they couldn't open (they thought). I use a RedHat box as my primary workstation, so I wasn't terribly nervous about a .zip, but I ran f-prot and clamav against the file anyway and it did indeed come back clean. I re-ran the definition updates and it still came back clean.

    So I unzipped it and ran strings on it. The first things I saw were sync.c and all the .DLL's at the end of the file and I figured that it was a new virus. We immediately put a cludged filter in place on our email and went looking around the 'Net for some sort of announcement of this new virus - which we found on f-secure's web site. It was about an hour later that we were able to get a signature update for our anti-virus software on our mail server and about 6 hours later before we were able to get updates for our enterprise anti-virus software (I won't mention the vendor).

    We "caught" over 400 infected messages before we even had a signature for it. That was scary. But what scared me most was the thought that this could have been a "real" worm. MyDoom isn't very creative and not that harmful - making me think it was written by/for spammers, myself. But a few of my coworkers got to talking. What would have happened if this had a more creative payload and it spread via network shares as well? What if, instead of opening back doors (which made it very easy to nmap our networks for infected machines even before we had a "detection" tool) it just looked for all .xls files and randomly changed numbers. What if it then looked for .doc files and randomly added garbage, deleted words, or some other crap? How long would it be before people started realizing this was larger than just a file or two getting corrupted? By then these files have been backed up and/or forwarded to others as well.

    I remember several years back now there was a virus that replaced all .jpg files with copies of itself. It about ruined a friend of mine who was trying to start a "web design" business and had thousands of images, many custom made for his clients, destroyed in an instant. It devastated him (he does good backups now).

    If someone decided to get serious and release a worm with a (dare I say) "terrorist" payload. They could, literaly bring my comapny to its knees in a matter of seconds.

    Now before you go off half-cocked and yell at me for "giving people ideas", take a deep breath. Almost everyone in my office was thinking along the same lines. We were discussing ways to mitigate an event like this in our own enterprise and how we could block any spread out of our networks.

    We came up with the obvious: have good backups, but then we started to think about how to stop the spread out of our networks and realized that up till that point anyone could have an SMTP "server"/virus set up and send mail out. We now block ALL incomming and outgoing SMTP except the ones to and from our mail servers. We also don't allow POP or IMAP in or out except to our mail servers. If people want to check other accounts they can RPOP from our server - at least it will go through our virus and spam filters first.

    If more ISP's/companies did this, the spead of MyDoom would have been slower. But how do you mitigate the effects of having a virus "corrupt" all your documents? Even if you catch it right away and restore from last night's backups (after checking ALL your computers for infection) you still lose an entire day's worth of work for many departments. That's a big setback.

    MyDoom infected department heads and department "techie" people first because their users came to them with an attachment that they "couldn't open". The "techie" people explained later that they had their virus s

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    1. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you block port 80 as well, because if people are checking there hotmail accounts, they just punched a hole in your security setup.. BTW-Blocking "outgoing" smtp traffic is a little crazy and won't solve much, most Outlook virus use they default SMTP server (your server) to forward the email, and not bother carrying there own code for SMTP services (as it require a lot of additional code, you'd have to worry about DNS MX record lookups, etc...)

      Blocking the POP will only work if they try and use .. for example .. hotmail.com's POP3 to retrieve there email, but that isn't needed since you can use IE and port 80 (which I assume isn't blocked?!)..

    2. Re:I should post this AC by Niet3sche · · Score: 2, Informative

      If someone decided to get serious and release a worm with a (dare I say) "terrorist" payload. They could, literaly bring my comapny to its knees in a matter of seconds.
      Anyway, one of these days we are going to get hit with a "real" worm with the intent to do severe damage to corporate infrastructure. The long-lasting impact will be far beyond just the initial damage. How do we prepare?

      We prepare via cybersquads and training of anti-terrorist folks via Information Assurance degrees. I remember seeing IA offered at 6 centers of excellence via a Slashdot story about 18 months ago (I think). And now, I'm at one of these centers (Iowa State University), doing a Master's in Information Assurance. I think that it is VITAL that we start to take a good, solid, strong look at computer/network security, as reports from a couple years back indicated that everyone else has cybersquads of terrorists ready to go. Me, I think that this will be our next battlefield. Seriously. Especially for countries that want to comply with Rules of Engagement; imagine - you nuke their computer systems, bring infrastructure to its knees, get civilians to clear out ... and that is when you go in and route out the head honcho. On the other side of the coin, it would give a definite battlefield advantage to either feed your enemy misinformation or to allow no information to get through their comm networks.

      But ... we (the US) do have mechanisms in place now for this ... and since the market sucks so bad, it's only a matter of time before the majority of us are wooed by some good offers by Uncle Sam (to say nothing of the Cybercorps scholarships - which I didn't take because of the time limit imposed; I'm also in a PhD program here).

    3. Re:I should post this AC by NtroP · · Score: 1
      There are always ways to get around our "blocks". They were instituted to reduce the spread of viruses. If we would have had our smtp (outgoing) block in place before this we could have stopped the spread of this virus to others. If others had done the same, this virus would have been much less of an impact.

      You are arguing that if you can't be 100% effective don't even try! At least, if ALL viri must use our SMTP server they would be scanned first. Maybe, since we update our virus defs 3 times an hour from 2 separate locations, we can stop the spread from us to you sooner. Wouldn't you appreciate that?

      I not only have a responsibility as SysAdmin of my enterprise of protecting my own users. I must do everything in my power to protect others from the actions of nodes on my network!

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    4. Re:I should post this AC by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0

      well... als everyone knows this worm was not intended to be evil. De was made to kick sco's ass for being such a bastard. Don't know if it helped, but if not, maybe there will come a second one.

      And btw. i "installed" a modified version of the virus on my machine after i got the first mail with it.
      Just because i loved to see that on the net, if you're a bastard, your ass will be kicked, no matter what the laws say.
      I think this is a good thing. (Because it's *fair*!)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:I should post this AC by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Ye gads! I'm a domain admin. If I had gotten infected I could have single-handedly taken down the whole place!

      Please, please tell me you're kidding, and that you don't work logged in as a domain admin unless you're doing admin tasks?

      You seem clued up otherwise, so I figure you were just kidding there.

      But... ;)

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    6. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For those not near a school offering a degree program, you can also get training and certs from GIAC:
      www.giac.org

      I've got a GSEC myself. If anyones wondering, most companies are not looking for this, but having this and explaining what it means during phone interviews got me into interviews I would not have gotten without it.

      No, I'm not unemployed right now. HINT.

    7. Re:I should post this AC by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      and about 6 hours later before we were able to get updates for our enterprise anti-virus software (I won't mention the vendor).

      No sense in hiding it. Gotta be Norton AV. I don't know how it ever became the "Enterprise Standard" AV when it's obvious to everyone how much it sucks.

    8. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I not only have a responsibility as SysAdmin of my enterprise of protecting my own users. I must do everything in my power to protect others from the actions of nodes on my network!

      And you sound like the sort of guy who would first put warnings on packages of toothpicks, and then lobby to make them illegal, because if you happened to have one stuck up your nose (god only knows why) and then fell down, you could die.

      You are arguing that if you can't be 100% effective don't even try! At least, if ALL viri must use our SMTP server they would be scanned first. Maybe, since we update our virus defs 3 times an hour from 2 separate locations, we can stop the spread from us to you sooner. Wouldn't you appreciate that?

      Yep, your super-duper double-decker always-updated virus scanning software would have done a hell of a lot the first day MyDoom came out, seeing as no updates were avaliable to trap this virus until (for instance) I had received around eight hundred copies.

      If we would have had our smtp (outgoing) block in place before this we could have stopped the spread of this virus to others. If others had done the same, this virus would have been much less of an impact.

      And, oooh! If we block incoming and outgoing SSH, the SSH exploits wouldn't have had so much of an impact! And if we block outgoing POP and IMAP, then users will HAVE to pay us for extra mailboxes! And if we block FTP, it'll be harder for users to inadvertantly download viruses that way! And, ooh, let's block HTTP, that way users will have to use our cache so we can see what they're doing! In fact, let's require that users actually use our "services" sitting in front of a television, and require them to submit to full body cavity searches three times an hour whilel they're online!

      Sorry, buddy. I'm not buying it.

    9. Re:I should post this AC by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Restoring from backup is also a great way to add viruses that you eliminated in the meantime. Most backups are done automatically, and not necessarily after a virus scan. Scary, isn't it?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    10. Re:I should post this AC by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

      uhh, you are a total and complete jackass. HE'S TALKING ABOUT AT WORK FOOL! AS IN ALL YOUR COMPUTER ARE BELONG TO THEM!

      do what you like from home.. or quit and go back to flipping burgers.

      point is, this gentleman made several good points, and discussed several OPTIONS that all tend to provide better protection for everyone involved.

      you see, when it comes to the bottom line ($$), no company in the world is going to give a rats ass if you cant stand the fact they are monitoring/controlling your internet time.

      it's actually not YOUR time they are monitoring/protecting. it's theirs. wake up fool, not everyone is out to get you and take away you civil liberties. you hand those off at the door when you go to work. most of them anyways...

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
    11. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But how do you mitigate the effects of having a virus "corrupt" all your documents?"

      By trying not to get the virus in the first place. Considering that must virii run on Windows, maybe it's time for your company to look at other OSes: linux of various distros, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Solaris, etc. If your company must use Windows because it needs certain Win-only apps, you can use WINE or Virtual PC. Or at least minimize the damages in the event of an attack: run PCs in mixed environment. Monoculture and security have been discussed many times so I won't bother repeating it, but it is very true and makes sense. Just be open-minded about the fact that Windows is not the king of OSes other than sheer volume.

    12. Re:I should post this AC by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Norton AV became the standard because once upon a time, before it was bought by Synmantec, it actually was the best.

      Actually, Symantec was better then too. I suspect some kind of reorganization where the bean counters took over from the techs.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you run Windows Server 2003 with volume shadow services on your file servers users can restore previous versions of documents (ie before they were corrupted) without even claling the Helpdesk.

    14. Re:I should post this AC by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You're right that corrupting data would be much more damaging than just DDoSing a website or spamming. However, I don't think it will lead the public to a greater understanding of security. More likely, it would lead to press sensationalism, with MS convincing people that this is why they "need" Palladium/.NET/DRM, and the Homeland Security guys saying that they "need" tougher "anti-terror" laws. There will be no mention in the press about how all of it could be prevented if only MS had done the job right the first time around.

      What a wonderful world we live in, eh?

      On a different note, you should be damn glad that the virus wasn't signed "Osama bin Laden". The first joker that does that is going to send us down the road to government control of the internet "for national security reasons".

    15. Re:I should post this AC by Helvick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A number of comments:

      Speaking as an admin in a seriously large Windoze shop I'm astounded that an alert Linux admin can think it's a smart idea to actually do normal day to day things while running in a user context that has elevated privileges. Browse the web, read your mail and plugging into hostile networks are not things you should do while holding the credentials to the castle.

      Strip all attachments. No one really needs them.

      The platform as such won't stop stupidity. Dumb user Beth will still try to run the thing and enough Beth's, Bob's and Biff's will succeed, paricularly if almost everyone runs the same OS regardless of what it is. In any case if she can't HotDawg Admin will do it for her. See above.

      That aside though there is a real need for discussion of your core points. This general type of dicussion is common where I work too but not common enough in "security circles". I'm surprised that we have never seen anything genuinely nasty and can only attribute that to a lack of a widespread understanding of large scale corporate\institutional systems or possibly the fact that none of the people doing this can see any money in that type of attack (yet). In any case the network share vector has been done but it's extremely effective - especially when a windoze virus infects files shared out from a Samba share, and in particular when Admins are careless about what they do when using a priviliged account. DOS'ing a target is one thing but a blind DOS based on something like Slammer's exponential UDP spread attack would be lethal within corporate networks as a secondary payload. Denial of Service attacks against accounts (particularly machine accounts in Windoze environments) culled from LDAP queries would be an awful mess to repair, particularly combined with the last item. Do you have account lockout policies? How many accounts won't lockout? Can your directory service handle massive lockout replication traffic?

      Modifying content would need to be subtle to be really damaging in an enterprise environment - a generalised DOS intended to cripple homogeneous firewalled off zones would be a nightmare.

      And despite all this - we still allow users to pretty much do as they please with "their" PC's. Oh well. I'm just waiting, wont be long now.

    16. Re:I should post this AC by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      We had a couple of them arrive at the mailserver before the antivirus signature update as well.
      But they did not get in, as we block anything containing executable attachments. Also when in .zip files.
      All blocked mail has to be manually examined, and of course this is done on a Linux system.

    17. Re:I should post this AC by g4sy · · Score: 1

      what is even more insidious (and i think like that) is that someone could potentially modify html, txt, doc, etc files on such content developers, and "change history". this would not nessesarily go noticed. someone, if they did it quietly enough, could modify public opinion, books as they get published, and other "reliable" sources of information. Before you cry "impossible", have you ever worked at a newspaper or a desktop publishing house, or a political organisation, or a web content firm? Well, i have work in all theses places, and they have just as bad a security as everyone else. Someone could potential sabatoge our intillectual infrastructure (if the western world has any left).

      --
      somewhere, on a Big Red Sign:
      if(color==blue){speed--;}
    18. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most domain admins I have met get tired of logging in and out of their system every five minutes to swtich between email and admin tasks and end up being logged in using their admin account only.

      A bit scary but all too common. Not to mention some organisations don't even provide multiple accounts.

    19. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, silly me, what did the virus look like?
      I got a dozen odd zip files, but most of them were empty (22byte zip file with nothing inside). I think I got 1 zip containing an exe and one pif or lnk.

      RU saying ppl ran the said exe after unzipping the file?

      Whats the deal?

    20. Re:I should post this AC by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Losing a day's work is recoverable. Losing a few years or decades is not.

      But how do you mitigate the effects of having a virus "corrupt" all your documents? Even if you catch it right away and restore from last night's backups (after checking ALL your computers for infection) you still lose an entire day's worth of work for many departments. That's a big setback. ...
      We came up with the obvious: have good backups,


      Have good backups.

      Good. The classic time to find out you need the backup is as you are destroying it by writing bad stuff on top of old-but-good stuff.

      Backups. Plural. Figure three minimum. One's no good. One you write instead of read or otherwise destroy in the recovery attempt. This leaves one for you to recover from.

      The only backup that does anything but waste time is the one you will actually need. The only thing you can be reasonably sure of is that when you need backup, something isn't right or working right. What you want is to give yourself the best odds of recovery with the minimum expenditure of time, money and effort. The thing to avoid is an elaborate expensive backup system that works perfectly ... until you need it. You're much better off with multiple poor-quality but independent backups.

    21. Re:I should post this AC by temojen · · Score: 1
      RU saying ppl ran the said exe after unzipping the file?
      Yes.
    22. Re:I should post this AC by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Please, please tell me you're kidding, and that you don't work logged in as a domain admin unless you're doing admin tasks?

      Dunno about him, but I'd probably give you a heart attack. I'm posting this from work where I'm logged in as "root" which is the domain administrator. When I leave I don't log off or turn the machine off. The problem with admin tasks is that they tend to come up in the middle of something else, and they tend to have a bit of urgency to them. Not good when you're in the middle of several things you don't really want to have to shut down. The user/administrator distinction in Microsoft Windows is not nearly as useful as the user/root distinction in Unix. Microsoft Windows is not geared to being logged into multiple systems as multiple users simultaneously.

      FWIW, my users are very good about not even attempting to open things they shouldn't. No problem with virus signatures that aren't quite up-to-date. No virus with the name "anti". Figure that the antivirus software will do a good job of catching the ones that don't matter and completely miss "the big one". The one I'm waiting for uses the antivirus as an integral part of the virus, possibly by "cleaning" a bunch of good data files and documents.

    23. Re:I should post this AC by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      I not only have a responsibility as SysAdmin of my enterprise of protecting my own users. I must do everything in my power to protect others from the actions of nodes on my network! [Emphasis added]

      Correct priorities, even from a purely selfish standpoint.
      Getting viruses. You can't control that (unless you control the rest of the universe).
      Sending viruses. You can control that. The universe of what is reasonable to send should be vastly smaller that what what is reasonable to receive. Basically, you don't send strange attachments.

      Of course anything that stems the tide, particularly if it can be done cheaply and easily, helps enormously.

    24. Re:I should post this AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind that you should not be running on a user acct with domain admin access! Run as a user.

    25. Re:I should post this AC by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

      Good point; GIAC/SANS serve as a good jumping-off point, and are a respected and reasonable cert/training program and information source, respectively.

    26. Re:I should post this AC by ripcrd · · Score: 1

      Here's the way I test for viruses:

      take spare PC.
      Ghost OS image on it.
      Run all sec. updates and virus updates.
      save image of PC.
      copy suspected virus to pc.
      DISCONNECT from network.
      run suspected virus.
      Oh yeah, use a non-privledged account created for testing purposes. (testuser - no admin or poweruser rights)

      --
      --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  120. Maybe Andy is an android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andys don't exactly care what happens to us humans or our PCs.

  121. Not to be off-topic... by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    but I don't give a lick about Andy, I just want to see some more of Janet (Miss Jackson if you are nasty...)

    -- rwx

  122. I knew it. by kryzx · · Score: 1

    It's that kids from "Toy Story".

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  123. Off Topic by Jason_says · · Score: 1
    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    Hey were did you get that quote. Its awsome

    1. Re:Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original quote was "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for them Mexicans."
      You can read more about it here:
      http://lightning.prohosting.com/~humorous/a rchive/ politics.html

    2. Re:Off Topic by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      No, that is not the original quote. That is just a similar (and more famous) quote. The original quote was taken directly from a redneck who was complaining about all the foreign speaking people shopping in a record store in my hometown.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

  124. Could FZ have forseen all of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lyrics007.com/Frank%20Zappa%20Lyrics/An dy%20Lyrics.html

  125. "OK", "Ignore", "Cancel" by koi88 · · Score: 1

    Or some even click "ignore" to virus warning?
    I'm also using OS X at home (and love it). At my university, I'm using mostly windows. The problem is, with Windows, you are forced so often to click "OK", "Ignore", "Cancel", etc., you just get used to it.
    Every Windows user I know with an installation older than 3 months performs this orgy of clicking after booting and after starting certain programs.
    I must admit, I also do. On windows.
    Maybe that's why people stop reading and just click "OK". (Install Trojan? "OK")

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  126. Information Week's site is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably a DDOS attack...

  127. virus contains stolen IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait for SCO to claim they wrote the virus and someone stole the code from them

  128. Andy Kaufman (was Re:Andy Wharhol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Fools! It is obvious the referenced Andy is none other than Mr Kaufman.

    The virus is, of course, from Elvis.

    I am sure the father of pop himself would've conceded.

  129. Andy not the only string in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Simple strings on mydoom.src (or whatever you want to call it)

    shows up a few interesting things including:

    Libra .... so Andy is a Libra
    smith[C ..... Smith - its Andy Smith isn't it!
    &joe?neo ... hes a matrix fan and likes joe.
    andy ..... well we already knew this was here.
    tory .... ahh so the mans a conservative..

    So lets put these strings clues together:

    Name: Andy Smith
    Likes: Matrix
    Born: 24th Sept - Oct 23rd
    Associates: Joe, possibly Neo from matrix
    Political Persuasion: Conservative.

    that narrows it down a bit.

    or could it be Agent Smith perhaps with that neo reference so close to the smith one?

    thats it isn't it, the matrix has us and Andy is trying to warn us by infecting computers around the globe.

    Hope This Helps

    hahaha

    peace :9

  130. Now that's good trolling.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Whoa. I am fucking impressed. This is paradigmatic.

    Let's break it down.

    Step one: agree, but shift focus to the opposite party.

    Step two: make a specious, but "sounds plausible" argument about how windows isn't as bad as we think and better than in some ways that it is nothing like.

    Step three: interject a third alternative.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  131. Grammar genius alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you've made you're choice?

    "So you have made you are choice" is what you said, Genius.

  132. safe exec by jrexilius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    all the discussions around email and attachments has got me wondering. Do any mail clients have a VM environment in which to handle attachments?

    I am thinking that Ximian could have capability to create a temprorary sandboxed wine VM to deal with attachements. I am sure someone could do the same for that legacy OS that stupid people run. Every time you double click on an attachment, or actually even open email it is doing it in a sandboxed VM or something along thos lines...

  133. DOING HIS JOB???!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't anyone see the writing on the wall yet?

    Viruses are turning computers into spam relays. Other viruses are DoSing various anti-spam blackholes. Yeah, this one happened to hit SCO and Microsoft, but the payload is easily changed, now that the virus framework is out there.

    Viruses are being PROFESSIONALLY written to HELP SPAMMERS! Go read some recent comments from Symmantec folks, and you'll see the same conclusion: Spam and viruses are being funded and run by organised crime.

    Will Microsoft stop them? Nope! The US government? Not a chance. AOL? Laughable.

    I quite believe that the author (whether Andy or not) was doing exactly what he said--his job, that he was no doubt being paid very well for.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  134. The first version contained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the following text:

    (sync.c,v 0.1 2004y#Uo"1/xx : andy)

  135. All Points Bulletin by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Be on the look out for male subject with red yarn hair and wearing patched denim overalls. May be accompanied by a female known as "Raggady Ann". Approach with extreme caution. Report all sightings to Microsoft Security Services or Darl McBride of SCO Group. Reward Offered.

  136. I already mentioned this by kellman · · Score: 0

    I mentioned it here
    It's really old news. Come on guys...

    --
    I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed...
  137. Best reply ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to be a Simpson's fan...

  138. Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was a great post!! Hilarious! A great way to start the day!!!

  139. Re:sorry for what-erasing distinctions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "MyDOOM takes advantage of the user's ability to run executables directly from his/her email client."

    That's because MS is trying to remove distinctions. We witnessed this when our desktops (inside) became web pages (out there). Now we see this with E-mail. It's presently imperfect (leaky abstractions), but give them some time and E-Mail will be the invisible vehicle (IM and others will likewise be invisible) that brings what we really want to get out of our web desktops. In a perfect world one could get away with this, but we all have locks on our computers, and our doors, and have to deal with the breaks in conceptionalization it causes.

  140. OMG! It's the A&E Network! A&E...A-and-e by patmandu · · Score: 1

    The evil bastards! It's all a plot to get ratings back from E!, which we all know will soon be airing True Hollywood Story: SCO

  141. Andy by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Is there anything good inside of you? If there is, I really wanna know.
    Is there anything
    Good inside of you?
    If there is, I really wanna
    Know
    Is there...?

  142. *Pats SCO on the head.* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the spokesman said SCO will unveil a contingency plan Monday for customers to access the site. He declined to discuss those plans, citing hackers.

    "So we've got some code that we know you've stolen and put in Linux, but we're not going to tell you what exactly it is."

    Is anyone buying this?

  143. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by anotherone · · Score: 4, Informative
    That virus and MyDoom have nothing in common besides a substring of characters. "Doom" is a common english word. Computer viruses do not "evolve."

    Someone wrote the Doom2 virus, and someone else wrote the MyDoom.A virus. Someone else entirely modified the MyDoom.A virus to create the MyDoom.B virus. There is no way to "find algorithems to track this evolution" because it does not exist.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  144. Hired by the Anti-virus vendors by DuckWing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, the speed at which some of the AV software makers come out with "fixes" for these viruses before they make any headway still makes me think one of them (Symantec? McAfee?) hired the guy to do it so they can stay in business.

    Yeah, yeah, I know, Conspiricy Theory, But man does it ever smell bad.

    --
    -- DuckWing
    1. Re:Hired by the Anti-virus vendors by ericbrow · · Score: 1

      My first Conspiricy Theory is that Andy is an employee of SCO who was ordered to create the virus. This way, SCO will look even more like the victim. What kind of fools are they that they couldn't handle the number of hits they KNEW they were going to get?

  145. Re: it's WARHOL not Wharhol by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    as title

  146. Re:Don't blame Andy! elitist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what's elitist. People know, or should know, that it isn't a bright idea to run an EXE file on their computer that came from some random onknown source. Just like I know when I get an email that has a subject like "happy milf titties 45 zonking potato", I just delete it, I don't open it and then be surprised it's some porn or viagra advert.

  147. Good news, the Bible tells us what to do: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw your number of 4193, I recognized it was meant to be used in conjunction with the Bible.

    The 4th book of the bible is Numbers, verse 19:3 reads:
    "3You shall give it to Eleazar the priest, that he may take it outside the camp, and it shall be slaughtered before him;" KJV

    So we just need to find Eleazar the priest, give Darl to him, and we can get this whole matter cleared up.

  148. a song for andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Livin' Next Door to Alice from Smokie
    2. rewrite the virus ahhhh song (especially the who the f**k is alice?)
    3. ...
    4. fun

    any suggestions?

  149. It would be interesting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... how many people would still install a worm, if at the first start a window popped up, saying: "You are about to install . Installing this program is subject to the following terms and conditions:"

    Followed by
    - a term to not make the author of the program (i.e. the worm) liable for any damage the program may cause, even if the possibility was known to the author (of course it was!)
    - a list of terms explicitly allowing every single action of the program (as: "This program may cause itself to be automatically started on every start from windows" and "This program may send mails from my computer to anyone with any content")

    and then would only be activated if the user clicks "I Agree".

    Note that this would also give an interesting legal situation, since the user would explicitly accept the damage via this click-through license, and the damage would depend on him doing that.

    I doubt that the author non-liability term would be effective in that case, though. :-)

  150. Kill 6 million people? by ArseneLupin · · Score: 1
    Doesn't anybody recognize that number? I think that should earn you a Godwyn!

    (and no, I won't mention what happened to the German parliament building some long time ago...)

  151. Is restricting program features really the answer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can run executables from attachments in mutt, too. Should we villify mutt?

    I don't think mutt ever warns anyone about anything, ever.

    I also suppose rm -rf / should make a big stink, too.

    Listen, you restrict your computer, buddy. I'll just keep on not being an idiot.

    Feh.

  152. Re:Right, that's *his*?! real name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the recent revelations regarding the mythical Iraqi WMD I wouldn't put it past the muddle-headed US/UK* 'intelligence' agencies.

    *(lovely acronym)

  153. Bad Andy! by toonrmeusa · · Score: 1

    I know who it was...

    --
    Toon toon! Black and white army!
  154. Error in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'The attack is programmed to continue on the company's Web site until Feb. 12, according to messages left inside the virus' code.'

    No, the code is programmed to stop attacking on Feb. 12.
    It is never stated in 'words' just in code, which is much more truthfull.
    But with a backdoor this could offcause be changed.

  155. or did he? by fearlezz · · Score: 1

    It may also mean:

    "Dear user,

    Sorry, I do such damage to your computer. But my writer told me to DoS sco/microsoft. I'm not targetting your pc, but the website to nuke. I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry.

    Best regards, the virus."

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
  156. Not just spammers by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Scammers and corporate spies would love to infect zombie boxes, to cover up their activities. Then there are the people who host files on other people's machines for sake of anonymous storage, such as kiddie porn vendors, black hat h(cr)ackers, and simple file sharers. And there is the straight ID and Credit Card theft that has been a mainstay for some time now. There are also the many people who simply cry "hacked" when their computers are caught doing something illegal.

    The problem is larger than just spammers. Such shoddy worksmanship is the mainstay of many types of criminal activities.

  157. God's Name by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    The preacher looks a the blonde in Sunday School.
    "What is the name of God?," asked the preacher.
    The blonde thought for a minute and then said, "Andy!".

    "Andy?," asked the astounded preacher, "How do you that?"

    "Well, the song goes...Andy walks with me, Andy talks with me..."

    1. Re:God's Name by sbryant · · Score: 1

      Funny... except that it's Harold.

      Our Father in heaven,
      Harold be Thy name...

      -- Steve

  158. Oh My God by jeko · · Score: 1

    Buzz and Woody would freak if they knew Andy was actually a script kiddie...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  159. Middle East War on calculator by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the old game of 'middle east war' played on a simple calculator.

    You do all sorts of number and word tricks until the display "71077345".
    Then you ask who wins the war. To get the answer, turn the calculator display upside down.

  160. Whippersnappers by mog007 · · Score: 1

    Back in my day, we didn't download a virus from the internet, we made our own, and we were thankful for it!

  161. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by oni · · Score: 1

    You seem to suggest that the virus is mutating due to errors it picks up as it is copied from one computer to another. Sorry buddy, it doesn't work that way.

    A human being wrote this thing.

  162. Extraordinary Genius by tasinet · · Score: 1

    "..and left the message 'I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry' "

    __________________________________

    "Our interpretation is that he's apologizing to the general public," Jimmy Kuo, research fellow at anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc., said Friday.


    I mean, WOW! Who could have "interpreted" that but a research fellow at anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc.! Amazing!

  163. FBI Visit by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    So, if you're a computer geek and your name is "Andy" please don't be surprised when the FBI shows up to ask you some questions.

    [I'm going out on a limb here to bet that "Andy" is short for "Andrea" ]

    Seriously, though...why would h/she apologize? Kinda strange. "doing my job" --raising NAI stock I suppose? he he

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  164. Microsoft has a competative edge by k0jo · · Score: 1

    I really like how microsoft.com seems not to be feeling anything, and on their main page, they have a little graphic with a smiling african american gentileman, who seems to be semi-smerking at the weak attempt at ddos. Above said man's head, it reads "keep your competative edge" and the man smiles on...

  165. i got andy! by FlashBuster3000 · · Score: 1

    I got him/her!
    My wise and almighty friend google sais it was Andy, obviously a student from Standford and google is always right!
    Arrest her (or pay her a lot of money)!

  166. oops by dabadab · · Score: 1

    my mistake, this guy has confused me with his nonsense ;)

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  167. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by timjdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The interview transcipt at http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0107/28/cnncom.00.h tml mentions variants. I suppose an "official" taxonomy does not use the name "MyDoom" and the names are referring to something found in the virus? The bad thing about viruses is we see quotes like "cntained the name Andy" but never see the source. Analysis without analyzing the primary source is always, at best, suspect. Could have been some bit vector or shifted struct for all we know.
    Symantec as of June 02 still was suggesting a taxonomy: http://www.scmagazine.com/scmagazine/sc-online/200 2/article/29/article.html. And current papers are using similarity rather than possible revisions/evolution: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=948190&dl=AC M&coll=portal.

    My point was the comparison algorithm is similar to the new image search algorithms. How to find all images of a ball? That's not easy. Likewise for viruses. Some similarity assessment with known viruses could lead to faster detection. Surely the virus writers are re-using each other's work?

    Of course, one day someone will marry file formats and evolutionary algorithms to make an evolving virus. Then the taxonomy may not even be appropriate. Obviously they are not evolving as the rate of evolution has to be matched to the host reproduction so one would surely expect a "killer" virus. Interestingly, the current viruses that dominate, Doom2, soBig etc. do not destroy the OS and, in this respect, clearly mimic the successful viruses of nature. BTW, life form viruses are also not classified by evolution as only in the last few years has the computer power begun to be significant enough to allow this analysis. Of course the assumption is the same as with computer viruses that similar structure implies similar evolution.

    Tim
    P.S> I ran a virus scan on my computer and apparently had lots. I cleaned them all but still get pop-ups unrelated to the web page when I use IE! Just don't remember how to track down those ActiveX controls so I use myIE2. I can turn off all ActiveX controls in IE but it gives me no way to select certain ones.

    --
    Expect Freedom.
  168. You mean Fedora, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uhh... isn't Red Hat project now moved to Fedora project?

  169. Andy's picture, taunting Bill Gates! by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    I found him!
    Andy!.

  170. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by gid13 · · Score: 1

    CURRENT KNOWN computer viruses do not evolve. You could, in principle, write some kind of a virus that replicated itself a lot (probably many times on each infected machine) that induced a random change in the code. In theory, you could even have them create their own sandboxes on an infected machine and test themselves a little before releasing them out onto the rest of the machine. You would then essentially create digital life, which would compete for things like hard drive space, RAM, processor power, bandwidth... There was a brief section of The Happy Mutant Handbook (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/157 3225029/002-9812208-7453627?v=glance) that deals with an individual's experiences causing "digital evolution" on his home pc.

    And even apart from that, one could perhaps argue that the sudden jumps in person-modified code in current viruses would be a reasonable use of the word evolve.

  171. Security points by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Why would you ever want to do this?

    Because there's a really easy call in the Win32 API that "opens" a file, or does whatever Explorer defines as opening that file. Mail programs are encouraged to piggyback off this Explorer functionality. Said call was not developed when network security was an issue, and "integrating" office suites and the OS was a primary goal of MS. Apple was doing the same thing with OpenDoc.

    A) no one needs a "feature" like this. Save to Disk and then run if neccesary.

    This is not a fix. The same "open this with whatever program you're using" call takes place when the user double-clicks the icon. This just adds another step. I doubt users are inadvertently clicking on "open". They simply don't realize the consequences of opening the file.

    C) a warning dialog after the double-click is useless. The person has already decided to run the program, to them it just seems like annoying interference from their stupid computer.

    Agreed.

    The UNIX CLI takes a different approach. The Mac OS/Windows/GNOME/KDE DEs take the approach of having a "default action" for a filetype. This means that if a user does not know what a file is, they can inadvertently perform an unknown action on that fiel by double-clicking it. The UNIX CLI dictates that a user must know what program uses the file and choose to execute that program on the file before the program is executed. This provides somewhat better security -- the user is *forced* to understand what he is doing before he is allowed to perform the action -- at the cost of a much steeper learning curve.

    Even this is somewhat vulnerable. Unfortunately, there are many ways to embed active content in seemingly harmless files. .doc files simply allow one to include active content in the form of macros, but there are plenty of other approaches. Think of the number of servers that have had remote buffer overflows over the years. Now consider whether software authors generally apply the same level of dilligence in robustly handling garbage data files as they do incoming remote network connections. If WinAMP's MP3 handler has a buffer overflow on, say, overlength ID3 tags (note that roughly this *has* happened in WinAMP before), then worms can spread simply by users opening even known, trusted content in apparently understood files. ("Well, Bob sent me this new MP3 of Britney Spears orgasming, and I just wanted to hear it...")

    The main currently available solutions are:

    * Don't use C/C++ in favor of something with bounds checking. Unfortunately, most current alternatives suck. If there was something with the good design of ocaml but was an imperative language, we might be going somewhere.

    * *Robustly* check everything coming into and out of a program, and verify any assumptions before trusting data. We've been trying to do this for years, and authors still fail to do this properly. Unlikely that this will work as a final solution.

    * Sandbox all programs at the OS level. This requires significant effort on the part of application and OS vendors, and while it makes screwups harder to do accidentally, there's always a temptation to bypass security features to make a coding job easier.

    * Sandbox untrusted data, similar to what some trusted operating systems do -- enforce data flow, but across multiple systems. This would require Internet-wide infrastructure changes and PKI to be put in place -- something that has a huge number of its own difficulties.

    * Limit forms of data interchange. This has been tried and hasn't worked too well -- people want functionality. Firewalls and HTTP proxies were put up to keep people from running applications over the network -- and today, we just use SOAP. Making people only able to send text email attachments is just too limiting.

    * Push blame onto end users or IT. This is not a solution, but it's what's mostly happened -- Microsoft and other vendors have consistently blamed

    1. Re:Security points by Peaker · · Score: 1

      Because there's a really easy call in the Win32 API that "opens" a file, or does whatever Explorer defines as opening that file. Mail programs are encouraged to piggyback off this Explorer functionality. Said call was not developed when network security was an issue, and "integrating" office suites and the OS was a primary goal of MS. Apple was doing the same thing with OpenDoc.

      API's that make some insecure things easy are not "bad". API's should be easy, whether or not they make insecure things easy. This is akin to blaming the tool rather than its user.

      As for languages, Python is great, and its "slowness" is a non-issue for the vast majority of software code that needs to get written (probably more than 99% of the LOC's written these days). Whereever Python is "too slow", you can put a piece of Pyrex instead, or just use Psyco.

  172. Why his name 's NOT Andy. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    1. Whoever wrote this virus isn't just doing it because he was paid. It's not his job.
    Why?
    If he was doing this professionally, for organized crime, he'd know leaving clues in the virus that might help trace it back to those organized criminals would get him D-E-A-D.
    2. Claiming that he's just doing his job helps fuel those folks that think SCO is doing this to themselves. Again, if that's true, the moment they read "Andy" in the news, Darl and Co. will be trying to cut this guy loose so he doesn't drag them down. The best way for them to do that, short of stooping to organized crime's level and shooting him, would be to announce they have found the culprit, one of their own programmers, who was "Working as a double agent for the enemy Linux zealots, and did everything without SCO's permission". Notice that hasn't happened.
    3. If "Andy" doesn't work for SCO or Organized Crime, then why say "just doing my job". If he actually hates SCO as much as it appears at first, and that's not a ruse, the claim does further damage to SCO, as it encourages the "SCO did it to themselves" faction, and may result in more rumors and potentially damage SCO. Remember, if "Andy" is a genuine SCO hater, he thinks the virus will damage SCO, so he is likely to think FUD directed against them will as well.
    4. But this makes the "just doing my job" line a lie. Ergo, "Andy" is at least very likely to be a lie too. Why? Because "Andy" has told one lie already AND because lieing like that has the secondary effect of helping hide his real identity, so why not do it some more once you've started.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  173. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    You need to get Ad-aware and Spybot search and destroy. Google for both of them. Also run msconfig and disable startup items that don't look like they belong there (cryptic names, weird install locations).

    Finally, STOP USING IE! Just quit using it altogether. Stop using Outlook and Outlook Express also. These are like the goatse man's ass when it comes to security holes. How do you think all those viruses and worms snuck in? Get Mozilla and setup mozilla mail. Problem solved.

  174. Re: it's WARHOL not Wharhol by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll spell it anyway I want, asswhole.
    -russ
    p.s. the guy down the block put up a sign condemning someone who had stolen lights off his plow, and yes, he spelled it "asswhole".

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  175. Interesting link... by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    A a commented before (by kindly reposted anyway...)

    Googgling Andy and sco I found this juicy tidbit

    "SCO understands that for any operating system to be commercially viable, especially Linux, it needs a well-defined roadmap from a trusted supplier, who is committed to and capable of supporting it," said Andy Nagle, director of SCO Linux products.

    The question is, is this saying "sorry Andy" or "this is Andy and I'm sorry" (Either way it's a quote worth framing. :)

    Again, were I big on tinfoil...

  176. Spammers still spreading it by tbase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the copies I'm getting now are to invalid addresses at my domain. Made up firstnames @mydomain.com. I originally thought that the virus was making these names up, but then today it dawned on me. A few weeks ago I started getting undeliverable messages to those same made-up addresses. Some spammer(s) is using my domain with random names as a from address in their spams. Now either there are a lot of people with infected machines who have copies of spam with those bogus from addresses that the virus is harvesting, or the same spammer(s) that is using my domain is mass mailing copies of the virus to keep it spreading. So many of these bogus addresses are out there now that all the common firstnames@mydomain.com are pretty much ruined.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:Spammers still spreading it by tweek · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I've just got done blocking about 30 or so random first names@mydomain as well.

      I've decided that I'm going to go back through my emails and see which addys I've actually used and start blocking the rest. Worst part is that my personal email is using just my first name which is as common as sand in the Sahara.

      I hate having to register a new email wit my server just for a specific website but that's what it's come to I guess.

      Maybe I can use a creative regex that always gets through and prepend that to the website name.

      Anyone have any nifty email generation utilities that create a hash of date and time along with website the email is used at to create throwaways?

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Spammers still spreading it by tbase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we're in the same boat alright - I've always used addresses like slashdot@mydomain.extention so I can tell if someone's given out my address - the worst offender was xdrive. I have one domain set up so everything that's not defined gets bounced, and I guess I'll have to do it on my main one.

      All of the sudden (as in the last 8 hours) 90% of the spoofed from addresses are in the .mx TLD, and the volume has gone through the roof. Someone with DSL in mexico apparently has the virus and all of the fake addresses at my domain. I may have found the SOB that's been using my domain.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  177. searching for andy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The writer put a message into the virus.
    2. (s)he must be curious about what people think of his/her message.
    3. (s)he might be a reader of slashdot...

    So if you find him/her among the readers of this topic please send me some of those bucks.

    You know my address:-)

  178. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The evolution wouldn't need to happen within the same machine. Each copy of the virus could send out bunches of slightly altered versions. The ones that succeed could do the same, etc.

    The tricky part would be deciding what parts of the code might get a change, and how to make changes that wouldn't be immediately fatal. (See genetic programming.)

    Once the thing got started, it might do nearly anything. Say your original version sent out 50% exact copies and 50% with a single bit alteration in a random location. (This is to keep the thing small.) That has the potential to swamp any virus detection method. If enough changed variants are successfully propagating. But that is, of course, a big if.

    But do notice that this thing isn't of value to anyone except someone who just wants to disable the net. You can't immunize against it in any permanent way, because it will evolve away. And it changes rapidly (perhaps too rapidly, but the mutations should fix that).

    The problem is, most of the mutations will be highly defective. It's only the survivors that will cause problems. Well, that's what you expect from a system based on evolution.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  179. We are looking... by sad_ · · Score: 1

    ...for a guy working at SCO called Andy.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  180. It's Norton / MacAfee by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    It should be obvious that Andy is one of the people employed by the virus scanning cartels to write new viruses, which said companies use to fuel product sales.

    (thick & chunky tin foil included)

  181. Tin Foil Hat Time: Andy works for SCO by thelizman · · Score: 0

    Think about it - you're a developer working for "the man". SCO execs have already demonstrated that they don't know jack shit about source code, so their ability to review the mydoom virus is limited (thought, they'll definately claim it contains System V code they think they purchased). Anyway, you're slaving away one day when a sucker in a three piece comes in, closes the door, and says "write a virus that attacks our own web site, or you're fired". How would YOU CYA?

  182. ANDY is an Acronym for by YukioMishima · · Score: 1

    Well, from the Anconym finder, ANDY may stand for:




    "ANDY [=] US Popular Abbreviation for Andrews AFB"



    So, nothing too exciting. Feel free to read conspiracy into it though! You might consider a party who lost the bid for Andrew's new RS Information Systems? Just search Google News for Andrews Air Force Base

  183. How Many IT professionals are unemployed? by voideng · · Score: 1

    I know when I was out of work for a while if somebody offered me a bucket of money to write something like this, I would have at least thought about it, If I had a family to support, I probably would have done it. Things like this will probably happen more and more with beter and better programers as the IT jobs keep going over seas, sooner or later the hammer will fall andf the public will be saying WTF? Why didn't somebody stop this form happening.

  184. Re:Don't blame Andy! elitist? by jrumney · · Score: 1

    It isn't an EXE file, its a an SCR file inside a ZIP, and comes with the comment "The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as an attachment". Most of the copies I've received have been from Koreans, who are more used to running into encoding issues than elitist Americans, and therefore more easily tricked by such a scam.

  185. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

    I've got a cure for that.. I just released a mutating TCP/IP stack to prevent the virus from sprea

  186. Article left out how Symantec assisted the virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About one out of five copies of mydoom that I have recieved has not been directly from an infected computer. Rather, the 20% of copies have come from NAV email gateways that provide a FULL COPY of the worm with a request to clean "my" attachment. Most other anti-virus gateways have just emailed me a warning without the attachment.

    But Symantec's own online virus database states that Mydoom uses a spoof'd from address. So why would their product assist with knowingly spreading the virus to spoof'd addresses that have not solicated any such "warning"?! I think the answer is simple and the conflict on interest is clear. If a novice checks the attachment that Symantec claim "they" sent then the novice will become infected and also assist in spreading the mass-mailing worm. More mass-mailing worm infections, more pressure on companies to buy anti-virus mail gateways... like the product that Symantec makes!

    Despite how common it is for their product to do redistribution to spoof'd from addresses, Symantec has not issued any statement that they consider this a bug or any ETA for a patch such that @MM worms will not be redistributed by their own products. Has anyone considered that this act on the part of Symantec might be actionable in the form a class-action lawsuit?

    The best excuse for this behavior I have heard is that if you have your own anti-virus mail gateway then NAV's method "will not effect you." This only addresses the damanges due to infection. It complettely ignores the bandwidth and performance issues that comes with redistribution a worm to an email address that is already known to have not solicated such a responce since it was knowning spoofed. Why should everyone else pay for Symantec's conflict of interest? Shouldn't Symantec be responsible for the damange in the form of charges in bandwidth and performance?

  187. My Precious by TachyonAT · · Score: 1

    Dude! This is clearly the work of Andy Serkis (aka Gollum) Nasty SCO, spoiling nice free software.... we hates them we does! They tries to take Linux for themselves!

  188. Your scrotum will pay for your refusal... by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Personally, I'd rather be unemployed than be paid by someone with the ethics to deliberately release software like this."

    Unemployed, maybe, but would you rather be hung upside down from a tree by your scrotum?

    Thats what you get when you say 'no' to the right (wrong) people, dude. Where have you been living?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  189. limited evolution by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    You could limit the evolution of such things, even if just by natural selection.

    An example of this would be in human evolution, because anyone with a serious enough genetic change to break breading-compatibility wouldn't be able to mate. That's why all humans, throughout this entire planet, are genetically compatible.

    You can do a similar thing through evolving software. So long as it uses one language, vbscript for example, it is extremely unlikely, if not impossible, for the virus to evolve into another language. Stick to an operating system that doesn't support it, and you don't have to worry about infection.

    That being said, immunization is as simple as targeting the general structure or the evolution code. The virus will evolve in similar ways, so you can track and elminate any evolution that is similar to a previous verison but no longer tracked by the previous immunization.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  190. smart... by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

    The creator of what anti-virus experts say is the fastest spreading virus ever on the Internet signed MyDoom and MyDoom.B with "andy," and left the following message in the latter version: "I'm just doing my job, nothing personal, sorry."

    "Our interpretation is that he's apologizing to the general public," Jimmy Kuo, research fellow at anti-virus software maker Network Associates Technology Inc., said Friday. "Our guess is that someone is paying him to write this thing."


    acute observation/interpretation. 2 paragraphs of e-paper wasted.
    will be reading poirot tonite - guy just piqued my interest again in deductions.
  191. backdoor by dcd · · Score: 1

    Why don't we hear more about the backdoor features, couldn't these systems with open backdoors be remotely patched to remove the virus, or do the backdoors have keys?

    Would anyone communicating to the backdoor be suspected of being the author?

  192. Andy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back to Andy... the mysterious andy...

    I know a couple of andy's. Should I be suspicious of all of them?

  193. Executable attachments by burbilog · · Score: 1
    Why your mail server allows executable attachments to pass through? I prohibited transferring ALL executable attachments (and executables inside archive files) when Sobig struck (antivirus update with Sobig came 20 minutes later and it was too late for our network with 300 computers on LAN and 40 shops around the city). But now I slept at home when MyDoom started to bounce around the internet instead of spending night cleaning everything. My boss called me yesterday and asked "I hear about horrible virus all around, why we aren't affected?" (funny, huh?) and I told him that's because I was firm when I said "fuck off, I won't allow executables in the mail ever".

    By the way, antivirus update was late for MyDoom too by about 30 minutes.

    There are NO legitimate reasons to allow executables, neither in attachments nor in archive files. Qmail-scanner and Nelson's patch do the trick.

  194. andy@sco.com ? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    Just doing my job, eh? Is there anyone named Andy working at sco?

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  195. Two things by IronBlade · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    But the spokesman said SCO will unveil a contingency plan Monday for customers to access the site. He declined to discuss those plans, citing hackers.

    1. SCO has customers???
    2. Security by obscurity..? Nice one, SCO, that'll save you (for a few minutes)...
    --
    Important info:
    http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
    http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
    http://www.peakoil.net
  196. Darl made him an offer he couldn't refuse. by rgiskard2003 · · Score: 1

    Giskard Reventlov

  197. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by Squarepusher · · Score: 1

    Has anybody here read Tad Williams' Otherland series? Mr. Sellars wrote some viri that interacted with each other and eventually leaked out into the net, where they "evolved" into some pretty complex thing-a-ma-bobs.
    That's a pretty lame synopsis, but it's been a number of years since I've read the series. It was pretty excellent though, I remember that quite clearly!

    --
    Every hour wounds. The last one kills.
  198. in an interview by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    There was a slashdot story about a year ago about a company that wouldn't hire anyone unless they agreed to unethical hypotheticals in the interview. The main example talked about was being able to push a button that would make you some money, but would also kill a third world peasant.

  199. DOING HIS JOB???!!!-Flashback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to add to the above. Don't forget there's a LOT of technical talent out of work due to outsourcing (possibly with grudges). Flashback is a slow fire that suddenly hits an oxygen source and literaly explodes. Payback's gonna be a bitch.

  200. Re: by E_elven · · Score: 1

    Yes. It's called small talk and most civilized cultures avoid this particular aspect of it unless the person actually wants to know how you are doing.

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  201. Re: it's WARHOL not Wharhol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'll spell it anyway I want, asswhole.

    Since you're not the original erroneous poster, you're obviously just a troll. Fuck off.

  202. Why did it take so long to find this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it kind of odd that it took them this long to find this comment written by the author of the virus... When you're looking through a binary executable file it's pretty easy to spot plain text in there.

    Maybe they're just really slow to report this but it just seems odd to me...

    Considering the "feds" are so intent on catching whoever did this, and considering they'd obviously have copies of the virus, it should have taken about 5 minutes maximum to find this text.

  203. Spot the mockery, win a prize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Strip all attachments. No one really needs them."

    Of course, its so simple! After all, its not like anyone uses email to transfer documents that they use in the course of business. Plus, Excel spreadsheets spend so much less time calculating when they're reduced to ASCII. Who needs to send & receive JPEGs, since its well known that graphic artists NEVER use computers, and nobody ever wants to send granny a few happy snaps. PDFs: who needs strict page layout, when its so much easier and convenient to juggle form blanks in plain text?

    No, we should be considering reverting to the levels of service and productivity we had in the 1980's, as you suggest. No desire for user convenience should ever impair the right of a sysadmin to make daft policies.

    "The platform as such won't stop stupidity."

    Of course not, because Dumb Users Beth, Bob and Biff will always be technically savvy enough to convert that skript or recompile the binary to operate in *NIX or OS X, or some other OS that doesn't grant low-level access to the email client.

    A poor workman blames his tools; conversely, a bad toolmaker blames his users. Neither one gets things fixed.

  204. Re:HEY! Doom's ancestry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well actually.. a computer program (virus) is just a series of logical components that act in a manner which is usually constructive.

    It is possible to set up systems using genetic programming which evolve solutions (mini-programs). So..

    Programs CAN evolve.

    Cheers,
    Fonz

  205. First person reference by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    The virus' name is "Andy." The virus is apologizing for doing its job. Think about it.

    This 1ee7 hax0r (script kiddie) has provided a glimpse inside his feeble mind. He's proud of his creation, enough to name it and give it an emotional context. He's feeling invincible.

    He needs a frikkin' girlfriend.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  206. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 0

    the story of how its author signed it "andy"

    Signed what?

  207. It's NOT a Warhol Worm by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The "Warhol Worm" is a hypothetical worm that takes over the entire Internet in 15 minutes, before any humans have a chance to react to it adequately, optionally followed by a "FORMAT C:". The SQL Slammer worm came pretty close to that speed (though it was easy enough to block once it was identified), and there have been a number of papers on the possibilities of such things.

    This isn't one of them. It's basically the same worm we had a couple of years ago, requiring gullible humans to click on the attachment. Moore's law means that PCs are faster, disk drives on corporate Exchange servers are bigger, and lots more people have broadband connections at home, plus offices often have faster Internet pipes than a couple of years ago, and apparently the humans using Microsoft email products are twice as gullible as ever before, so this worm has been faster than it has any business being. Sigh.

    Perhaps the gullibility really is in Warhol's territory. I am sending you this posting in order to have your advice. Click here for a Good Time

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks