Slashdot Mirror


Rolling Your Own Wireless Communications System?

nuggetman asks: "My high school, like most others, has a theater program. One critical element of the show is the tech crew - the group of people behind the scenes who keep it all running. Communication between the stage manager (myself) and crew members (as well as between crew members) is critical. For this job right now, we're using standard hand-held walkie-talkies. They get the job done, but they're susceptible to dead batteries, incompatibility between VOX headsets, and interference from janitors, the office, hall monitors, and even the local McDonald's. We've been wanting to invest in a theater-communication system, but they can run extremely expensive. Is there any hardware out there that could use a standard PC (Linux or Windows) and some wireless headsets to roll your own communication system that could cover a long enough range (say the theater which is the size of a gym plus a decent range outside it) at a low enough cost? Our school just installed 802.11b/g throughout the hallways, so we could tap into that if necessary and add our own router near the stage if we had to."

254 comments

  1. This is easy! by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Set up a private Counter Strike Server somewhere on the school LAN.

    2) Get a laptop (with an 802.11g card in it, of course) and backpack for each crewmember.

    3) Every crew member joins the game on their laptop, sets the laptop to never suspend, throws it in their backpack, and uses headsets to communicate with their team members!

    Other than the sound of an explosion every three minutes or so, and the occasional "Terrorists Win!" all your communications problems are solved!

    1. Re:This is easy! by octaneplus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to turn sv_alltalk on

    2. Re:This is easy! by epiphani · · Score: 1

      Hes got a point. Have you thought about seeing if cheep palm-based or winCE based pdas have audio/netmeeting type support?

      --
      .
    3. Re:This is easy! by FCKGW · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you're on the right track. How about TeamSpeak? I don't think you need to be playing a game to use it. If the crew will be relatively stationary, just put in a cheap networked computer running either Windows or Linux and a headset for every person. If they need to move farther than a cord will let them, see if wireless headsets exist. Make the fastest computer the server and you'll be all set.

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
    4. Re:This is easy! by BenFranske · · Score: 5, Informative

      You obviously have no experiance in theater. Techs are expected to do anything from crawling out over suspended ceilings to crawling under a stage or running up and down stairs during a performance a laptop in any sort of arrangement would get in the way and be easily broken, nevermind that for the price of a few laptops you could buy a real system from someone like Telex or Clear-Com. I would suggest visiting ControlBooth.com and asking this question in their forums to get some practical suggestions. These are people who actually work with this day in and day out so they have real life experiance. Here's my idea to do this on the really cheap. It's not that hard to build a private phone network that doesn't actually dial but works like a party line, just put some voltage on the line. Get yourself a bunch of cheap cordless phones that allow headset use and lock the phones on so the line is always open. It's far from perfect but is the closest thing I can come up with off the top of my head. Don't take my word for it visit ControlBooth.com and ask in the forums, they're good people and know what they're doing.

    5. Re:This is easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need modded up...if I could, I would.

    6. Re:This is easy! by FCKGW · · Score: 1

      Of course, what I mentioned above is what I'd use if I had to use computers. A good set of two-way radios with headsets, plus some rechargeable batteries and enough chargers to do all at once would be better and last a long time. I have some Motorolas I take skiing that can last a few days on alkaline AA batteries. Even with rechargeables, headsets, and more talking, they should still last at least the few hours required for a show. Just make sure to charge all the batteries between shows, and have some extras on hand for emergencies.

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
    7. Re:This is easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With an attitude like that, you'll never bag those theater chicks.

      You mean the overweight goth lesbians?

      of course, your parent there clearly has no "experiance" in spelling. On the other hand, he also clearly a)knows what the fuck he's talking about, and b)isn't a dickhead. Which are two things I can't say about you.

      OOOOH, YOU GOT ME! PARDON ME WHILE I GO COMMIT SUICIDE! And I didn't make a typo you fucking moron. Read the post again while I rape your mother.

    8. Re:This is easy! by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      I think most who replied to this post are missing the point. I'm pretty sure that nuggetman was talking about having computers located at 2 or so base stations throughout the theater (such as in the booth, costume room, etc.) and having wireless headsets connected to those computers. This would allow only a short range from the computers, probably at most like with a cordless phone, but is a decent idea as it would likely lead to better sound quality than the typically lousy radios that school theaters use. I picked up a "VoIP" cordless phone made by AT&T a few years ago at Best Buy. It cost about $50 and the VoIP feature was simply standard 1/8" audio input and output jacks, allowing compatibility with most anything. I'm sure these could still be found somewhere, and would work fairly well in this application. The only problem is that without difficult configuration, you would be limited to one user per computer most likely, and users would have to remain within range of their base station for it to work (i.e. there is no roaming). This would actually work well for most members of the crew, as they normally don't have to go too far, but there are plenty of scenarios where this wouldn't work. With some computer expertise, however, you could probably install a multi-base system with at least 10 users for about a grand.

      Then again, I could be misinterpreting this. I really don't think that there are any actual headsets that run over wireless ethernet, and if there are they would be prohibitively expensive.

      Either way, I wish you luck with your show!

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    9. Re:This is easy! by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Theater chicks are over rated. Good for a while, but too much, no pun intended, DRAMA.

      Seriously, I've had my fair share........so.......yeah........

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    10. Re:This is easy! by ericdano · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, but, what about LATENCY? I don't see how a computer set up is going to be better than a good wireless system. Plus, how many more failure points are you going to have with a computer system? I think it would be extremely stupid.

      Shure makes some excellent wireless products for the music end of it. I'm sure there are other products out there that would work well. You could even be really geeky and get those Nextel radio/cellphones for the crew. I've played a venue recently that the stage guys used that.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    11. Re:This is easy! by jusdisgi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey dumbass...instead of suggesting that I read your post again, perhaps you could just focus on the part of my post that says "your parent there clearly has no "experiance" in spelling."

      Perhaps in addition you might take some time to ask around and find out what a "parent" is with regard to slashdot.

      Oh, yeah...and it's interesting that you claim to have no experience with theater yet clearly know that a)all the performers are gay, and b)all the women are overweight. Of course I'm guessing you haven't yet mobilized your neuron to figure out that some hot chick is almost always playing the lead, no matter where you go to see a play.

      Yep, plays are full of good looking women, surprise surprise. Don't forget, people do cast these things (that means someone chooses the actor/actress for the role, you ignorant fuck), and it's not like all the plays around are about overweight gothic-looking people. Typically you'll find that the folks in high school or college plays are much better looking than a cross section of the school.

      Man, you really are fucking stupid.

      But then, you can't even put a decent flame together (wtf? i mean, not catching the reference to the parent post? and these insults..."fucking moron"? "rape your mother"? you gotta be kidding me! my granny can flame better than that, boy!) so I guess we really can't expect you to notice the obvious truth when it interferes with whatever mindless, unfounded, and inaccurate stereotype you are pushing.

      For the record, I've been to untold numbers of both high school and college productions, but never been involved myself. I have seen some _really_ good looking women there, including some I knew well at my own hs that were into theater...even dated a couple...and somehow my heterosexuality never seemed hampered by the situation at all. I'm interested in what insecurities you might have, perhaps sexual, perhaps otherwise, which might cause you to be such a fuckhead...

      Of course, not sure what i'm wasting keystrokes on here...just some provincial uncultured dumbshit fuck who would have been left as a cumstain on the backseat of his mom's nova, if only his dad hadn't gone off so quick he was surprised by it, and didn't pull out in time.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    12. Re:This is easy! by jusdisgi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...dumbshit fuck who would have been left as a cumstain...

      Wait. I'm sorry, I didn't mean that.

      No, I meant "who should have been left..."

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    13. Re:This is easy! by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      hehe. yeah. i catch your drift. but, no question about it, there are some nice lookers in the bunch.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    14. Re:This is easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no experience with jokes.

    15. Re:This is easy! by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      I agree that computers would be foolish. I saw the need to explain what you would need to do, however, as it shows that it can be done but would be challenging and not the best method. Granted, there are many approaches to this problem, and each has downsides. Nextel would possibly work for some, but many theaters are good examples of Faraday cages and monthly costs are unreasonable for anything off-Broadway. Ultimately, there is no reason that standard business class radios, such as those made by Motorola, wouldn't be the best solution here. You can get fancy with those and program different channels and so on (or something like that), so that interference shouldn't be a concern. I've pulled security jobs with McDonald's at large venues with many groups using the same kind of radios and we never have had any interference. These might be expensive initially, but they are durable and there are no recurring costs other than ocassional battery replacement. Plus, with those you can get the cool secret service looking earpieces.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    16. Re:This is easy! by 4km · · Score: 1

      ClearCom is great, however if you have the choice I would go with telex, first telex actually makes all of the parts for clearcom, secondly it uses balanced audio there for running next to power lines is not a prolbem, and best yet its often costs less. But no matter what you go with, buying clearcom or telex once is going to be cheaper than sever sets of walkie talkies, laptops, PDAs, cordless fones......

    17. Re:This is easy! by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      Or you can go for this Cisco 802.11 IP phone. Probably a bit cheaper than PDAs (I'm guessing, I didn't compare prices) and is sure to work a lot better.

    18. Re:This is easy! by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, people do cast these things (that means someone chooses the actor/actress for the role, you ignorant fuck), and it's not like all the plays around are about overweight gothic-looking people.

      I have to disagree on this. School plays take from the club, not a broad pool of actors. So casting can do very little. As far as my college was concerned all the drama chicks were somewhat overweight and into weird things like goth. There was maybe a single girl on my track team (a thrower) that weighed more than any of the drama girls and we made fun of her endlessly.

      Anyway it makes sense that the drama folks would be chubby compared to the actual lookers in the school, the jocks. Dancers generally gave better things and practices to do than the drama club so they don't even have that helping them out. Denying the generally overweight nature of drama chicks just makes your own veracity seem strained.

    19. Re:This is easy! by abmurray · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no experiance in theater. Techs are expected to do anything from crawling out over suspended ceilings to crawling under a stage or running up and down stairs during a performance a laptop in any sort of arrangement would get in the way and be easily broken, nevermind that for the price of a few laptops you could buy a real system from someone like Telex or Clear-Com.

      Um, I think you just missed the joke entirely.

      --
      a.b. murray

    20. Re:This is easy! by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      "You obviously have no experiance in theater"

      You obviously have no sense of humor. Or spelling. :P

    21. Re:This is easy! by dsnail2000 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Clearcom does have a wireless bases station with wireless beltpacks available.

      Hey BenFranske Thanks for the ControlBooth.com links!!

      -dsnail2000 (aka - dvsDave)

      --
      ControlBooth.com
      Technical Theater Made Easy!
  2. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use yelling. Everyone comes equiped with all the right hardware. No sweat.

    1. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that this communication takes place -during- the performances; that might not be such good idea... actors get grouchy. quickly.

    2. Re:Easy solution by punxking · · Score: 0

      Would certainly *lighten up* that highschool production of Macbeth:

      (from somewhere backstage): "Get the dagger prop... the DAGGER prop!"

      --
      You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
  3. Back when I was doing this at school by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... which was admittedly about 18 years ago, we were happy to have the very latest technology... microphones and headphones (well, it was on a school-sized budget :-)

    To be honest, I'd be surprised if WiFi would help you very much - it'd have to be a VoIP network, which isn't an obvious use of WiFi (the range is too short - most people would simply shout!)

    Bluetooth might be an option, but they're basically clever walkie-talkies. Buy some rechargeable batteries and carry them. Sometimes the "clever" solution is the low-tech one...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      I don't see how bluetooth is any better. The range is certainly far too limited.

      Regardless, any brew-it-yourself solution would probably be far too large, anyway. I doubt you could run VoIP on anything short of a small laptop anyway, and you certainly can't go buying those for every student.

      Probably best, as you said, to stick with the older tried-and-true methods. Get newer walkie-talkies with multiple channels and keep 'em charged.

      Or you could get Nextels for all the crewmembers.

    2. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just use the goddamn cellphones everybody has anyway. You can even send SMSes if you need silent communications sometimes.

    3. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by atarione · · Score: 1

      how is bluetooth suppose to help the range is much lower than 802.11b??? I don't get it?

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    4. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      the range only needs to cover the distance from your headset to the pocket in which you keep your mobile

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'd be surprised if WiFi would help you very much - it'd have to be a VoIP network, which isn't an obvious use of WiFi (the range is too short - most people would simply shout!)

      Actually, I want VOIP on my zaurus handheld.

      Let me explain why: cordless phones (not cell phones, the kind that connect a base station to the wall phone jack) are easily intercepted with consumer equipment. Tin-foil hat aside, there have been several cases of weirdos tapping their neighbors' conversations just for kicks.

      And in an apartment, it's pretty easy to have several neighbors innocently using the same cordless channel.

      What I'd like is to have a VoIP-to-modem bridge. I'd talk and listen on my Zaurus, which would connect to my PC via WiFi. The bridge would turn the IP back into audio and connect to the modem via the sound card.

    6. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by ericdano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I played a show recently where the crew had these. Seemed to work really well.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    7. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      Thats hardly tinfoil hatted. Running it all through ipsec (like I would) would be tinfoil hatted. :D

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    8. Re:Back when I was doing this at school by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      Blue tooth range is shorter then wi-fi. You can get Voip enabled cellphones but your school would have to pitch out about $500 a handset. You can build something similar with certain pda's. If you want more info just reply with your email addy and i'll hook you up.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  4. A solution by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some of my friends and I make up the A/V crew at my school, and I came up with an ingenious solution yet to be implemented: a zipline. The A/V booth is about 20 feet higher than the stage and a good 75 feet away, and we decided that a zipline would be the best way to get down to the stage to tell somebody something important.

    I guess if you need to tell somebody something who's level with you then you'd have to invest in some model rocket engines or something.

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
    1. Re:A solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, that suggestion gives a whole new meaning to the term "flaming idiot."

    2. Re:A solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Brilliant one-way communication that still requires physical wires running all over.

      Run several wires instead of one, and put telephones on each end. Telephones work uphill also.

    3. Re:A solution by superpeach · · Score: 1

      You could have just stuck little plastic pots at each end of the zipline and talked to each other (that was the first site I found :) look at the experiments section).

  5. Vonage by daisychain · · Score: 1

    www.vonage.com

    1. Re:Vonage by daisychain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, wrong company. I meant Vocera.

      http://www.vocera.com

    2. Re:Vonage by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up, this looks like a very interesting solution. I can't seem to find a price but since it uses 802.11 i would bet that it is far cheaper than a proprietary system.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    3. Re:Vonage by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Oh my, how lame! Just get some good, made for the job, equipment. These internet things are not going to hold up in a theater enviroment. I know, I've played nearly 60 productions.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  6. problems by Mieckowski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure there are probably a lot of problems with interference, but shouldn't it be possible to just get better walkie-talkies? Computers have their own problems too, and I'd imagine that any device you are using to communicate will have dead battery problems (unless you want to have 20 ft cords running all over the place).

    1. Re:problems by olorinpc · · Score: 1

      That would probably be the most cost effective solution. It would be cool to set up some sort of cutting edge system... but on a HS theater budget - swinging for better walkie-talkies will be hard enough.

      Something with rechargable batteries is what we use at the theater dept at my college. Sometimes someone misses one and it doesnt get charged, but for the most part it works for us.

  7. I wonder how... by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Makes you wonder how in the hell Shakespear ever got by without a Slashdot subscription.

    Sheesh. It's high school, dude.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:I wonder how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first statement stands alone; it is the cheese.

      The thing about high school was weak -- you should start thinking whenever you fancy it. No need to wait until after high school or start too soon.

    2. Re:I wonder how... by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my highschool used cue sheets and we had I think 4 radios, 1 for the director, 1 for lighting engineer, 1 for the sound engineer and 1 for the stage manager.

      Everyone else remembered thier cues or looked to one of the 4 for information.

      BTW, my school whooped ass every year at the theater festival in Muncie, IN and 3 people I worked with my senior year ended up on Broadway.

      P.S. I went to James B. Castle Highschool Kaneohe, HI c/o 92.

      Ummm... Go Knights!

  8. Get some cups and string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you can build a great communication system. It's easy to do, even my 5 year old nephew can do it.

  9. digital walkie talkies by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

    a few pairs of decent quality digital walkie talkies (im assuming u are using analog at present) would probably be a simpler, if not cheaper solution in the long-run.

  10. Change frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hit the frequency button on everyone's walkie-talkies twice. Any other questions?

  11. I made my own by slash-tard · · Score: 0, Troll

    I used some custom DSP's from TI, some RF modulators from Radio Shack and some standard 12 guage wire. Works better than most commercial solutions costing hundreds more.

    1. Re:I made my own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a little more detail and you might get modded up...

    2. Re:I made my own by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      1)DSP...first off, I can think of a few acronyms that fit, but I'm assuming you mean "digital signal processor" and I have no idea just what exactly you mean to do with one.
      2)RF modulators? Like, uh, the things you use to plug RCA (composite) video+audio input to RF (coax, RG6) output? WTF?
      3)12ga wire. Ok...I can see how this would have application in a communications system. Except of course for the fact that 12ga is FUCKING HUGE and that I have NEVER IN MY FUCKING LIFE seen anyone use anything bigger than about 20ga for communications purposes. Especially digital communications purposes.

      Basically, I think you are full of shit. Really, really, really full of shit. Like, if you were a Native American, they would call you "Walking Eagle" because you are far too full of shit to fly. I mean, like, right before that guy comes in the truck to pump the shit out of the handi-jon...yeah, you're the handi-jon. Full to the brim. Of shit.

      Obviously, you thought it would make you sound cool if you threw a couple of things that sort of sound like they might apply in a two sentence "look how smart I am cause I already did this" post. Of course, you ignored the fact that this system clearly needs to be wireless. And you ignored the golden rule of slashdot...somebody's almost always around with the bullshit detector.

      Oh, and that 12ga wire thing. Heehee. Jackass.

      But I'm really, really interested in hearing you prove me wrong. Preferably by explaining just how in the hell this collection of shit is expected to fulfill the stated goal.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  12. Every problem looking like a nail. by normal_guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like a battery-management issue more than something requiring a complex software solution.

    --

    Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    1. Re:Every problem looking like a nail. by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Aside from that, we only control 2 out of the six or so radios we use. The rest belong to the office. Which is yet another reason.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  13. Skype? by UFgatorSean · · Score: 1

    Skype is still a free VOIP solution. I think the problem would most likely be wireless headsets with good enough range though... I hope this helps!

  14. ClearCom? by Arcady13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just buy a few ClearCom headsets. If wireless costs too much for you, get the old-style models and some lengths of XLR cable. Why waste time with all this computer stuff? It just complicates things. Use the simplest solution.

    1. Re:ClearCom? by elsilver · · Score: 5, Informative
      Just buy a few ClearCom headsets. If wireless costs too much for you, get the old-style models and some lengths of XLR cable. Why waste time with all this computer stuff? It just complicates things. Use the simplest solution.

      I'll second this suggestion.

      When I was in high school, we used RadioShack walkie-talkie type headsets, with both press-to-talk (PTT) and voice activated mikes. We were always dealing with dead batteries, dropouts, and the voice activated took turns being either too sensitive, or not sensitive enough for volume the stage manager neeed to speak at (fairly quiet, sitting just off stage in the wings).

      We even had interference from a Fischer-Price baby monitor, and spent an afternoon walking around the neighbourhood near the school, knocking on doors and asking people if they had any babies. I don't want to know what they thought.

      The next year, we got a set of wired ClearCom headsets, and all was good in the world.

      The signal was clear, and reliable.

      Because they were "the" standard brand, we were able to borrow extra equipment from the local theatre company when we needed an extra headset or something.

      They are also good, 'cause unlike the walkie-talkies, they come either with 1 or 2 earmuffs and do a good job of cutting down on outside noise (useful if you do bands or concerts).

      Spend the money. It's not that much, espcially when you consider (1) that they'll still be chugging along in 20 years, when the RadioShack stuff is lucky to make it through 20 weeks, and (2)over those 20 years, how much are you going to be spending on batteries which you need to replace each show (you are using a fresh set each show right?)

      Also, we rented them out to other groups occassionally, so you get a source of income.

      Do it the right way, you won't regret it.

      E.

    2. Re:ClearCom? by JDRipper · · Score: 1

      ClearCom is the way to go. Many theaters already use this system so you'd be using an industry standard. This will be helpful in getting a stage tech job in the future. The other nice thing about ClearCom is that it won't be affected by the Farraday Cage effect that can be caused by many lighting rigs/catwalks that are placed above the stage.

      --
      "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
    3. Re:ClearCom? by mu_wtfo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Damn, I already commented, and thus lost my ability to mod, so I guess I'll just add a "Me too!" post, to support the parent and grandparent's posts. Backstage communication is really, really, not a complex issue anymore. It's been solved, and solved well. Clear-Com, Telex, and Production Intercom all make extraordinarily reliable products just for this purpose. Yes, they're expensive, and yes, they're worth it.
      Having a cue get missed because your batteries died, or because someone is DDOS-ing your 'intercom server' is just plain unacceptable.
      If money is really tight, check ebay - I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised to find used intercom gear on there. And really, all you need is a base station and a couple of beltpacks and headsets. If you're really cheap, buy raw 2-conductor shielded cable and 3-pin XLR connectors and build your own cables (that's what I do :) )

      --
      If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
    4. Re:ClearCom? by mu_wtfo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to work at a theatre which had those Radio Shack wireless headsets. What pieces of crap. They were actually *worse* than nothing. Completely unreliable - I'd have no clue whether the person I was trying to talk to was there or not. They also really, really, liked to break. Usually at the 9v-battery connector, since the batteries died so quickly and had to be replaced so often. You can only solder those things back on so many times...

      --
      If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
    5. Re:ClearCom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ClearCom or related products are obviously the way to go if you can afford it. There are less-expensive brands that work just as well and are used every day in the entertainment production world (my profession). May I suggest you check out Telex, RTS (lower cost Telex) and Technical Projetcs (Clear-Com compatible). Build your own XLR cable to keep costs down.

      On Broadway, and in other major productions, wireless headsets are only used when absolutely needed (for roving deck hands, stage managers, etc.) This is less of a cost issue than a reliability issue. Wireless is a failure point, and we like to keep those to a minimum.

    6. Re:ClearCom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "knocking on doors and asking people if they had any babies. I don't want to know what they thought."

      mmm, baby pot pie.

    7. Re:ClearCom? by SMSUOwned · · Score: 1

      I work in a professional theater that handles all sorts of touring shows and bands, every one from broadway to your favorite band most likely has a set of clear coms keeping control of every thing. Motorola business band radios are basically the standard for wireless communication, if you get a license you can avoid alot of interference and they can be interfaced to clearcom. Both options are expensive but thats because they are worth it. one alternative is PRODUCTION INTERCOM, they cost less but are still great. In my expierience the wireless clear com only last about 2 years in a highschool.

    8. Re:ClearCom? by Huogo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do tech at my HS (sound), and we have both clearcoms and those cheap radio shack things. The radio shack wireless system sits in the boxes, unless we absolutely need another headset. The clearcoms work excelently, no interference. Only thing is they're like $500 per beltpack & headset, so it can get costly. Our sound system was installed with one in the sound booth, light booth, and stage left. I later added one for stage right/pit (in a musical). Right now I'm working on getting the school to shell out the $7000 I want for wireless microphones...

    9. Re:ClearCom? by compgenius3 · · Score: 1

      I work in the theatre at my High School. We have a clearcom system wired into the walls and it's really nice. It's always reliable and the only question of 'will it work?' is if the clearcom box works. We actually gutted the clearcom control system and made it fit our own needs, now the control box does absolutely nothing but is still required. Anyway if mobility is an issue, either make or buy some REALLY long XLR.

      --
      Sexual intercourse is kicking death in the ass while singing. ~Charles Bukowski
    10. Re:ClearCom? by ophix · · Score: 1

      as a former theatre tech in highschool and in college, i am supporting the clearcom movement

      this is not a wireless technology problem, if anything you dont want stray rf signals anywhere near the theatre due to possible interference with the sound board and lighting system (depending upon how new the lighting system is).

      if clearcom isnt an option, start investing in a ready supply of batteries and make each tech carry a spare set with them while they are working. i recommend duracell, IME they tend to last longer. change out the batteries right before any actual performance.

    11. Re:ClearCom? by gregmac · · Score: 1
      Why waste time with all this computer stuff? It just complicates things. Use the simplest solution.

      Yes, it does complicate things. And complication is a very bad thing in theater: if something CAN go wrong, it will. And theres enough that can already go wrong when you're doing a show.. if your communications goes wrong, it makes all those other problems that much more difficult to solve.

      We used to use private-band UHF radios with headsets, or at least headphones. My dad's company had a pair of these, and we'd go and rent a few more that were tuned to our frequency when we needed them. I don't know about pricing (ie, if it comes out close to say, clearcom, go with clearcom). But theres no interference (since it is a private, licenced band) and they go through walls etc with no problems.

      --
      Speak before you think
    12. Re:ClearCom? by Mindcry · · Score: 1

      When i was in high school we had a telex setup, though they use a 4 prong cord, i've not used any system within the last two years, but with clearcom's XLR setup, you have one less type of cable to stock, and its replacement parts are cheaper. If you've done any electrical work you can even solder together your own stations and just buy the headsets and the base.

      we had walkie-talkies, but they really, truely suck because of janitors and people being on the wrong channel, and the mic in them tends to be crap, so they're noisy and hard to understand... the ticket booth got the joy of dealing with these

      i would suggest against wifi, as schools are really bad about stopping resource hogs, you cant gaurantee someone wont be stupid when you need to use it... not to mention what happens if someone sees a computer and doesnt know/care its important and they to something stupid to it... a big part of tech is just trying to keep people (actors, fellow techs, random wanderers) from doing stupid things... and with no simple point and click setup (that I know of) for this, if something goes wrong it'd take more than 2 minutes to fix in all likelyhood...

      SOOO... i'd suggest the clearcoms, as they really are more idiotproof, and they work really well.

    13. Re:ClearCom? by no_such_user · · Score: 1

      I have to second (third? fourth?) this -- Clear-Com units are THE way to go. There's a reson the pro's use these units. On the other hand, they're WAY expensive for such (relatively) simple devices.

      If your school can't afford to buy a bunch, you should consider renting them, or perhaps trying to convince a local theatre group to let you borrow theirs. If you have a professionally installed PA system, the folks who supplied you with that can usually supply the belt-packs as well. Note that most of your positions can be wired, and with only a few wireless, that'll save $$$.

    14. Re:ClearCom? by BLuP1 · · Score: 1

      And I'll third (or fourth) this. You should also check with rental shops around, many of them have piles of the old ones they'll sell or give to you on the cheap.

    15. Re:ClearCom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's your solution:

      Motorola RECHARGEABLE FRS/GMRS Walkie-Talkies with 2-5 mile range. They last 24 hours easily on a charge (assuming you care for the battery), and additional batteries are available separately. Best Buy has good prices on these things. They claim 2-5 mile range, and from experience they handle going across a school pretty well and have better sound quality than those old 47 MHz Radioshack things (FRS runs around 450 MHz).

      Motorola Headsets. Motorola has done a good job making sure their headsets work with their equipment. Stick to the (M) and you'll be fine. Ebay is a good place to look for these things, they'll have OEM equipment near wholesale prices. I have one of the 53725s, and it's great for when you're following another car. Picked it up for $17 on ebay.

      Back in the day in High school, my friends and I A) couldn't afford cellphones, and B) didn't have cellphone service in parts of the town, including the school. We got a bunch of Motorola SLK 280s with rechargeable NiMH batteries (They used the same battery pack as the much more expensive and business oriented Spirit GT series) and that worked out great. These days the walkie talkies are retired, replaced by our Nextel i95s & i730s.

  15. Encryption? by Manip · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not buy some new handheld walki-talkies that have built in encryption (digital), wouldn't that be cheaper/easier than any computer network?

    1. Re:Encryption? by brilinux · · Score: 1

      Built in Encryption, at least in the US, is nothing more than CTCSS tones, as it is illegal to encrypt communications that rely on FCC Part 15. These will cut down on necessary interference, but will not improve range or comprehension, and any background RF that is strong enough will go through whenever anyone tries to transmit anyway.

  16. Once yuo pop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    teh fun never stops!!!

  17. What about interference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't using Wi-Fi be prone to interference and dropped connections? Walkie talkies are cheap and probably would do a better job.

    ---
    Funny site: www.geocities.com/mikecoxlinux/

  18. That's simple... by Mieckowski · · Score: 4, Funny

    All you need is some tin cans and some stri-
    Wait, does string count as "wireless?"

  19. Buy a couple of baby-monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the theatre I work in, we have a dedicated soundweb, but, yes, it is expensive. Instead, try buying a couple of pairs of baby-monitors- you should be able to talk and hear fine, depending on distance.

    1. Re:Buy a couple of baby-monitors by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      I hope that was trying to be funny, as any set of kids walkie-talkies will work just as well and probably on the same frequency for much less. It sounds like they already have some crappy setup with similar quality, however, so this is a moot point anyway.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
  20. Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    During a time where many people are complaining that schools are underfunded (Insert Bush dribble here), this guy's just got 802.11G throughout his highschool.

    Yea I'm jealous....

  21. The Nuclear Power Box by bbowers · · Score: 1

    aaah yes stage crew.. I remember when I did that for my high school. WE did the lights and sound for the plays. Our equipment was rather old and our intercom systems went out every now and then as well.... usually at key times in performances of course. Our intercoms were a headset type setup that was hard wired to the walls to a unit up in the booth. The ehadset connected to a little waist box as well with a call button and volume controls. Not sure on the model or brand but it was _mostly_ reliable. We always had problems with wireless mics as well... As for the headsets, there was a large box on stage... size of a golf cart approximatly... we called it the reactor. Anytime you'd go near it with a headset... bzzzzzzzzz you'd be cut off completely and the box would start buzzing almost. I probably have cancer or something now from being by it so much :o\

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
    1. Re:The Nuclear Power Box by glk572 · · Score: 1

      The big box was very likeley a dimmer rack, the buzzing was caused by the fact that at least one of your S.C.R. dimmers was on it's last leg. When the R.F. Choke starts failing on dimmers they throw out a very broad range of radio signals. This would also account for your problems with wireless mics.

      The head sets failing was likeley caused by a short in your head set cables, this kind of thing happens all the time. One branch having a short can bring down the whole system.

      Dimmer racks seem like they could cause cancer, the radio waves that they put out when they have failed are much stronger than cell phones.

      The dimmer room in my current theatre is about 15' by 15' and filled to the brim, the noise from all the buzzing, and cooling is absoluteley amazing.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  22. No PC by pirodude · · Score: 1

    I'm confused, what would the PC accomplish? You can't possibly consider trying to do a VOIP solution for a highschool theator. You may know how it works but when you graduate no one else will. Save the cash and buy clearcom or telex. They're really not that expensive once you consider just how long they last. I've seen clearcom systems that have been installed for atleast 15 years, and telex for even longer. Instead of posting this to slashdot, write up a proposal to send to your school board or even student council.

    1. Re:No PC by pirodude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More information for my original post.

      Consider the cost of your solution vs the cost of a regular system.

      CS-222 Clearcom 2 channel base station: $876
      Belt pack: $238
      Headset: $149

      Now you'll need a headset for the base station (which is a station by its self). So say you need 1 stage left, 1 stage right, and your base station will be at FOH for sound/lighting. That takes a basic solution to $1799 without XLR cables. Buying used you could probably save even more. Remember, not every single person needs a headset. You basically need someone stage left, stage right and FOH to give messages and give cues. I was in highschool theator and I know how much everyone loves to wear the headset to sound important. I can also remember how many cues people missed because they were messing around on them.

    2. Re:No PC by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      T-H-E-A-T-R-E

      OR

      T-H-E-A-T-E-R

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  23. Things have changed! by krygny · · Score: 1

    Ah, to be an audio/visual nerd again.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  24. Stupid technology tricks by DocJohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, this is just silly. A laptop is going to be far more expensive than some high-quality two-way radios from Motorola or the like. Even if you already had the laptop, there's nothing that allows you to easily tap into VOIP via independent headsets. I'm not sure why regular, quality two-way radios (at $40 for a pair with rechargeable batteries) isn't good enough for this simple application?

    1. Re:Stupid technology tricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      regular, quality two-way radios (at $40 for a pair with rechargeable batteries)

      I would suggest that you CANNOT get a "quality" two-way radio for $20 (unless it is stolen).

      If a wired solution is okay, I would recommend Clear-Com. As an earlier poster mentioned, they are reliable and sturdy as hell.

      If you need wireless, I would skip the Clear-Coms, as they are bulky and don't have great range. Spend an extra couple of hundred and get a Motorola EX600XLS. They are high quality, small and light, and I think you can get 8-hour NiMH batteries.

  25. GMRS Radios. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Get the commerical GRMS radios like that use at Target and Wal-Mart. You know the things you see the managers using.

    1. Re:GMRS Radios. by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      The radios we use at target don't have the range to reach throughout the building...other employees have to relay for us.

    2. Re:GMRS Radios. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I do not know what type they use but they have some sort of highpowered version that they use in the new Walmart Super Centers. The will work for about 1/2 mile around the building and everywhere inside.

    3. Re:GMRS Radios. by BenFranske · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could have a GMRS repeater you are unaware of, it would significantly improve range. But I have never seen a Target or WalMart use GMRS at all, typically they have "industrial" radio licenses.

  26. Speaking of fags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at a friend's house last night and when I got there he had already had several beers. Anyway, when I got there he hugged me. Does that make me gay?

    1. Re:Speaking of fags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, You caught the 'gay'. The only cure is to beat yourself over the head with a bible. Good luck.

    2. Re:Speaking of fags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that comment. I seriously laughed out loud and spit water all over my laptop screen.

  27. Give the Kid a Break by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is deriding the topic poster, but perhaps he's going to /. high school... It would be interesting to hear someone's cost effective solution for home brewed VOIP.

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    1. Re:Give the Kid a Break by boarder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, whether or not it makes sense to actually implement, I'd love to see how this could be accomplished... Haven't any of you done something ridiculously overcomplicated just for fun? Rube Goldberg? Not only that, but if this kid is in highschool, maybe he actually wants to learn something (as opposed to just learn how to do busy work).

      I am definitely not a network engineer or a wireless expert, but possibly a very simple solution might be a Roger Wilco server with some bluetooth headsets. VoIP is probably a pain in the ass and might require custom software. RW clients can be run on simple computers. Donated pentiums in key locations connected to the 802.11g network to the RW server, with bluetooth headsets to connect to those nodes.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  28. Back in the 60s we called them walkie-talkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 60s we called them walkie-talkies. About a sawbuck a pair.

    1. Re:Back in the 60s we called them walkie-talkies by ndrw · · Score: 1

      "Sawbuck?" Was that the 1860's?

  29. One Word by notcreative · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    "Shouting."

    1. Re:One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been a stagehand. Yes, there is shouting. But only *YOU* hear it in your headset. And it's usually something to the effect that if you do not remove this 250 pound set piece within the next 15 seconds, you are going to be crushed to death by a steel bar 60 feet long. You *don't* get to shout back. The person shouting is in a soundproof room.

  30. hmmm by extra+the+woos · · Score: 1

    Well it sounds to me like your just trying to transmit voices not anything that demands real high quality audio. Of course, you don't wanna mis-interpret someone. And you state that "they're susceptible to dead batteries" but obviously any wireless solution is going to be susceptable to running out of juice.

    It would certainly be POSSIBLE to hook up some old cheap computers, stick them in the stage area, the lighting area, etc, and hook up some wireless headsets to them. Then just run some voice software like speak-freely (available for windows or unix) or something...

    But i've just gotta say... I think this sounds a little too complicated if all you need to do is talk in the same building. Why not invest in some GOOD but inexpensive radios. There are tons of options out there.

    --
    replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
  31. Bad joke? by odano · · Score: 1

    Look what happened to the mars rover. Computer crash and communication is lost. Stick to walkie-talkies.

  32. ClearCom by zachlipton · · Score: 2, Informative

    While you could probably roll your own system with a lot of work, you are better off going with a real Clearcom system for theater use. They do both wired (cheaper, but it's really all you need for high school) and wireless (quite expensive). eBay often has some used eqipment you can buy as well. These systems are what are actually used in the field, and in many schools as well and are quite less likely to fail than a home-grown solution (rebooting the communications computer in the middle of a show so the SM can talk to a board-op is a very very bad idea). It may seem easier to put together a free system than buying the Real Thing, but by the time you purchase wireless eqipment and setup a custom system you have spent more in time and money than you would with a real system.

    $800 for a CS-222 ClearCom 2 Channel Main Station is a lot of money, so another thing you may want to try are Motorola TalkAbout radios with headsets (not in VOX mode though, you don't want that in a theatre since you want to avoid unintentional chatter on the comms system). They tend to have fairly good range in my experience and if you take the time to pick out clear channels there isn't an issue with interference).

    1. Re:ClearCom by circusnews · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this. Among the various other things I do, I run a youth circus program called Simply Circus (www.simplycircus.com). We use 8 of the talkabout 2 way radios, and have not had any problem with them.

      Before a show we will use the pair of T5710's we have to scan for others in the area and to find a pair of clear channels. Once we find a pair of channels that works (primary and backup), we set the rest of the radios to the same channel, and make sure every one knows he backup. The system works well for us. While the T5710's are a bit more expensive, the other radios run about $40/pair, including rechargable bateries and charger.

      I am planning to have the radios / chargers mounted in my van (same one we use to transport equipment) so that they will always be charged and ready to go.

  33. sheesh .. get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spend beaucoup $$$ on a 'theater communication system' for your freakin HS troupe .. how about dropping some cash on some acting lessons and Clearasil? .. that'll go a lot farther towards improving your productions than some high dollar comm-setup in the hands of all the pop-wannabes that wind up doing tech work

    assmunch

  34. Walkie Talkies by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use the money and buy more rechargeable batteries for the Walkie Talkies. Using batteries as an excuse to go VoIP, which also uses batteries, doesn't make sense.

    If interference is the real issue, look into low frequency radios with a 5 watt range.

    Sounds like someone wants a project.

    1. Re:Walkie Talkies by dougmc · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Using batteries as an excuse to go VoIP, which also uses batteries, doesn't make sense.
      The voice of reason.
      If interference is the real issue, look into low frequency radios with a 5 watt range.
      The school ought to be able to have a 20 khz or so chunk of frequency allocated to it. In fact, it may already have such a frequency allocated to it -- certainly there's a lot of schools listed in the scanner lists. This frequency should be mostly free from interference (as opposed to FRS or stuff on 27 mhz, 49 mhz, 900 mhz or any of the other unlicensed bands.) If you are picking up intereference, either your radios are just crappy or somebody's causing interference. If it's the latter, get your local ham radio club (perhaps the school has one?) to track it down for you, and the FCC may require them (the source of the interference) to fix it.
    2. Re:Walkie Talkies by mu_wtfo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gaaah!!! No, no, no!!! 5 watt transmitters in a backstage environment?!? I recently had to completely ban our Motorola 2-watt radios from the booths in both of our theatres, because when someone tried to talk on them, it would often induce RFI into the sound equipment, headset system, and, worst of all, the light board. You key up one of those things next to an unbalanced signal line, and *everyone*'s gonna know it.
      In a theatre, nearly everything is temporary - speakers need to be in this spot for this show, then, six weeks later, completely across the room - hence, most cabling and playback/processing equipment is portable, and certainly not run in nice steel conduit - which, sadly, leaves it susceptible to RFI.
      Yes, I've also banned the use of cell phones. :)

      (Master Electrician, Arden Theatre Company, Philadelphia, PA.)

      --
      If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
    3. Re:Walkie Talkies by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Gaaah!!! No, no, no!!! 5 watt transmitters in a backstage environment?!?
      I did not mention a power range -- that was the parent of my post. 5 watts is enough power to talk across town (or across country with the right antenna and frequencies, but I digress...) I imagine that even 100 mW would be plenty for these people's needs.
      You key up one of those things next to an unbalanced signal line, and *everyone*'s gonna know it.
      Unshielded lines? There's your problem. Let's hope nobody decides to use these to mess with you :)
      most cabling and playback/processing equipment is portable, and certainly not run in nice steel conduit - which, sadly, leaves it susceptible to RFI.
      That's what coax is for. Very RFI resistant, and pretty cheap as well.
    4. Re:Walkie Talkies by dougmc · · Score: 1
      That's what coax is for. Very RFI resistant, and pretty cheap as well.
      To followup to my own post, if this wire is going to something that handles only low frequencies, like a power line or a speaker wire, there's no need for even coax -- low-pass filters at both ends (some simple ferrite beads might do it) should cover that nicely, keeping the RF signal out of the electronics connected to it.

      Of course, you probably already know all this :)

    5. Re:Walkie Talkies by glk572 · · Score: 1

      No one in theatre uses coax, but I do agree about the shielding.

      Wired comunication systems are the only way to go, wireless GMRS is great for when you're running around during load in, stirke, or restorations, but during the actual preformance you don't need to really go anywhere, you just need to cue people.

      The army field band dosen't even use head sets, they have the phone hand sets, and flashing lights. For years theatre's just used cue lights, turn it on for warn, off for go. Fancy shmansey wireless is still too unpredictable.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  35. Cell Phones by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    Convince a local cell provider to donate phones and air time.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
    1. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offer to let them to put a cell site on your roof. That way you get good coverage too. Call the rental, as above, airtime and some cheap handsets.

    2. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet: Just confiscate the cellphone from every asshole that feels the need to have it switched on and ringing during the performance. You'd have free phones for everyone backstage within the first week.

  36. Easy fix, FRS Radios by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your best bet for cost and effectiveness is to get nicer walkie-talkies. At $40/pair Motorola FRS/GMRS radios have 22 channels, and a 2-mile range, plus you can get headset/microphones to go with em. I own a couple pairs and they're durable as hell (you shouldn't drop them in a lake, but mine came back to life anyway) and have 12+ continuous hrs on a couple AAs. Plus now you can multichannel your crew - Ch 1 is Lights/sound Ch 2 is backstage crew.... ~J >-- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Easy fix, FRS Radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well considering it's only for use in the gym and outside, the lower powered, non-regulated FRS radios would be just as effective for him.

    2. Re:Easy fix, FRS Radios by BenFranske · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FRS radios would be illegal. They are regualted and are only allowed to be used for individual purposes. If the FCC catches your school using them you can end up with a hefty fine, and don't think the FCC won't I know several schools that it's happened to.

    3. Re:Easy fix, FRS Radios by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They are regualted and are only allowed to be used for individual purposes.

      FRS is not restricted in purpose. 47CFR95.193 defines the use of FRS, and the only mention of "individual" is:

      (a) You may use an FRS unit to conduct two-way voice communications with another person.
      There is no limitation as to the purpose of this communications with another person, other than a blanket prohibition on use in connection with a violation of federal, state, or local law. Assuming the stage crew is not supporting a production which violates the law, FRS would be a low-cost solution to this specific problem.

      If you want more power to cover a larger area, then MURS is available -- which are the kinds of radios that Wal-mart et.al. use. It, too, is license free.

    4. Re:Easy fix, FRS Radios by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My appologies, FRS-only then, jim deane has it right. FRS-only radios should be fine however and not susceptible to FCC fines. From the FCC FRS Page:

      "You may use your FRS unit for business-related communications.
      License documents are neither needed nor issued. You are provided authority to operate a FRS unit in places where the FCC regulates radio communications as long as you use only an unmodified FCC certified FRS unit. An FCC certified FRS unit has an identifying label placed on it by the manufacturer. There is no age or citizenship requirement."

      ~J

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    5. Re:Easy fix, FRS Radios by djupedal · · Score: 1

      The rules are different when it comes to indoor, contained usage. As long as you're not in competition with ATT, you're legal :)

  37. Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can find information on rolling your own wireless communications system here and here.

    Note that the subject line wasn't "Good Info".

  38. Informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How does encryption solve any of the problems in this article?

  39. Better question...digitial microphones? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work with a lot of presentations and lectures and I'm dying to know if there is any consumer or prosumer level digital microphone systems out there? Everything that you can find both at cheap ass Radio Shack and even high end audio stores is varying degrees of wireless. 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz just like cordless phones. Some through the word "digital" around but are still susceptible to interference and static.

    What I'm dreaming of is something that is purely digital, from the device the speaker wears all the way to the speaker. I envision something like a Bluetooth wireless microphone similar to the bluetooth headsets that some cellular phones use. This bluetooth microphone would relay to either a box in the speaker's pocket or inside the lecturn. This box would then use CAT-5 or 802.11 to transmit the stream as a WAV or MP3 so that it could be played on a SlimMP3 or Shuttle connected directly to the speaker system. In theory the speaker could roam freely and speak clearly and sound crystal clear.

    Is there anythign like this? One place that I work for is about 100 feet from high power lines. The resulting RF interference renders even the most expensive $600-800 wireless microphone solutions worthless. Wired microphone even have a problem, even with grounding wires you still pick up pops clicks and hums over fifty feet.

    So, how about it? There are plenty of devices that can take an audio stream off a network and output a sound wave? How about a device that can record the sound wave and output an audio stream?

    FYI - consumer or prosumer means less than four digits...I'm sure studios and recording studios have plenty of expensive options available.

    -JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Less than 4 digits doesn't even really get you a good conventional wired mike.

      Plenty of pros are using wireless SM58's, I guess that's UT24/58. But you've already gone there I guess, and your power lines won't move huh?

      A hundred bucks can go a long way towards damned good low-Z cables. Just use real mic's! (The expensive options that the studios is still the good old wired Telefunken).

      Foley guys won't touch wireless. TV news folks use AKG's and Shure's, and deal with RF issues just like you. You aren't finding the high-end wireless stuff because there's not that much out there. People with 4 or 5 grand to spend on a microphone aren't bothering with toys like "wireless".

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      You're hearing pops and clicks on wired mics and you expect to use digital???

      Give me a break! As opposed to pops, clicks, hums and static when digital gets interference you just loose the signal completly!

      So ..t ..ound.. som..ing l..ke this.

      As someone else told you either spend some serious dough on a real wireless system top of the line Shure or the new Audio-Technicas. Or if you're really in a high line noise envronment get a good wired mic and some super shielded cable.

    3. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried balenced transmission lines on your wireless mics? the SM-58 is a balenced mic, so if you're using a balenced line back to your mixers you should have a tough time picking up interference with any reasonably short runs (100ft). Most mixers are balenced these days, but check your inputs anyway. If your mixer is unbalenced, you can try using transformers to create a balenced line... check out Jensen transformers. Transformers are pretty simple to rig up and are highly effective at rejecting common interference over a balenced line, if somewhat expensive at $70 each.

    4. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Any microphone is going to be vulnerable to interference from a big magnetic field near it. Microphones use magnets to convert sound into electrical impulses, so the only thing that might save you is microphones designed to deal with high RF interference.

      The same thing goes for the RF interference to a wireless setup. Digital isn't a magic solution that eliminates RF problems. The better solution as far as the wireless is to just go to a frequency that the power lines aren't putting out, which probbably just means a higher frequency.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by enigma32 · · Score: 1

      Much as the others have commented, digital won't help you (and I havn't even seen anything like that)

      But, for reference, 600-800$ is not a very expensive wireless mic :-)
      It's on the high end of the consumer range.

      The wireless kits I use frequently are roughly in the $2500 range for the transmitter pack and receiver.

      If you're stuck on wireless though, give FullCompass a call (www.fullcompass.com)
      They stock the higher end professional mics (Shure, AT, Senheiser) and might be able to help you with your problem.

      Wired is the best way to go though. (try an area mic? And get some good Whirlwind shielded cable)

      Good luck.

    6. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by Teach · · Score: 1

      Less than 4 digits doesn't even really get you a good conventional wired mike.... A hundred bucks can go a long way towards....

      Um, looks like you count 4 digits differently than I do. $999 is still less than four digits.

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
    7. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

      The first problem they were having is that the most expensive $600-$800 wireless audio systems are the cheapest. If you're not willing to drop $3000 per channel on sennheiser transmitters and receivers, where squelch, sensitivity, frequency, and a zillion other things can be set at the venue, you'll have problems. Also, you won't find any serious show using VHF. To much interferance. Most cheepo units are VHF.

      --
      -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
    8. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      Digital is all or nothing, but there's no way interference should wipe out the signal completely...especially considering it would not be very hard to overtransmit (send more stream information than needed in case some gets lost). There should be more than enough bandwidth available for a digital solution. Hell, voice sounds fine on a 128kbps MP3, I could send dozens of those on a computer network and play the best one. It shouldn't be that hard to do...remember, plenty of digital solutions exist to play music other ethernet (much higher quality demands) even though it's "all or nothing"...so it does seem to work.

      Plus, gaps are not the worse case scenario. Gaps, while irritating, are less irritating than a loud "SNAP" or "PLIC" noise that occasionally comes out when someone cranks up the microphone on a quiet talker. Sometimes they can get loud enough to startle people. People with hearing aids especially. Volume would probably be a lot more stable with a digital solution.

      -JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    9. Re:Better question...digitial microphones? by glk572 · · Score: 1

      http://www.jblpro.com/evo1/evo_main.htm

      jbl's evo system is the closest thing that I can think of to what you're looking for. It is however intended for the link betwene the mixer and the speakers.

      http://www.camcor.com/cgi-bin/bcatalog.cgi/area= pr e&brand=SOUND-CRAFT&pc=A1+

      the solution that I would use in your case is just to get a lecturn that has a built in pa system. you could plug in any mic you want. I recoment the old war horse the sm58, but if you're hung up on lav mic's there are many to choose from.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  40. better than shouting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok here is what you do.
    1. Start with a paper towel roll.
    2. Place paper towel roll in front of mouth.
    3. Move paper towel roll close to lips.
    4. Speak.
    5. ?
    6. Profit!!

    1. Re:better than shouting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay wtf how come i didn't even get one lousy point?!? dumb mods

  41. Now just wait a minute... by Phexro · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're a high school kid with walkie-talkies that can be used in pranks on McDonalds customers, janitors, and hall monitors, and you want to get rid of them?

    The U.S. education system must be going downhill fast.

    1. Re:Now just wait a minute... by Destree · · Score: 1

      not too long ago there was on the news, a story about someone 'harassing' drive-thru customers with that. Cops or FCC caught him (after it made news?) and are now charging him full extent of the law for running a pirate radio station, sending profranities over the air, basically everything that they can, at least that's what I heard on the news.

    2. Re:Now just wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in high school, we found that one channel picked up a baby monitor from the houses across the street. This lead to two things:

      First, some of the crew were amused during slow periods of that show by listening to the people's chatter. (or arguments, I don't quite remember)

      Second, we set up a baby monitor in the green room so the actors could hear their cues.

      In this case, I suppose it could make things easier when you're working on the weekend and need somebody to go out and pick up lunch.

  42. The very latest in technology by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    For something this "critical", you need technology that won't fail, but will also work in the kind of vast distances you're talking about. I suggest tin cans and string. Of course, you'll have to make sure nobody in the audience brought scissors, but with all the hi-tech anit-terrorism stuff they throw in schools these days, surely nobody can get in with sharp objects.

    1. Re:The very latest in technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how redundant is this post???

  43. Does it have to be wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been there, both in HS and college. Is there a particular reason it has to be a wireless system? We used wired ClearCom systems at both. Sometimes the cord was anoying, but usually it was not a problem, and it eliminates the VOX, noise, dead spots, etc. problems. A quick search found this
    http://springtree.net/pi/econocom.html
    whic h has some packages by Production Intercom that arn't too bad price wise, and you can probably find used equipment out there for less (eBay had some real ClearCom gear last time I looked)

    1. Re:Does it have to be wireless? by Christopher+Whitt · · Score: 1

      Here! Here! All the posts in the story are crap about WinCE devices and wireless laptops in backpacks! Get a grip! That will just be heavy, unreliable, expensive, hard to set up and a pain in the ass to maintain.

      Get a low-cost clone of the industry-standard ClearCom party-line intercom system. It's the tried-and-true method for theatres worldwide. There is a reason: IT WORKS! Simple setup and excellent intelligibility in noisy environments. Lots of accessories are available, such as call lights to alert you when somebody else on the line wants your attention, even if you have your headset off.

      You can interface wireless intercoms to ClearCom systems, but yes, they are pricey. Caveat Emptor. You get what you pay for.

      Christopher

  44. Any communications systems needs maintenance by zapster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problems you cite are universal for portable communications systems. Batteries going dead, bad headsets etc. The key is planning and maintenance. If it is critical to the show then make darn sure the batteries are charged before the show starts and if one doesn't last the entire show then dispose of it. (Nicads and nickel-metal hydride need to be disposed of properly, Radio Shack does this for free) Keep a couple of spare radios ready to go and charge some extra batteries as well.

    The better route to go is to get a license for your own radio channel and use higher end radios like police and firemen do. Schools often have a business band license for buses or maintenance that you could use on the off hours, this keeps other people off your frequency. The radios cost more but you are paying for reliability.

    Don't whine that you don't have the money, get a system designed by your local radio (Motorola) dealer and then start getting the money through grants and donations. I get solicited all the time for free stuff and sometimes the dealers can hook you up with a corporation that is changing systems out and looking for a place to donate the old (but good) equipment too.

    The main thing is plan ahead, and plan for things not going perfectly.

  45. Roll one? by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    Ok, i'll roll up the network in one, but I'm sure as hell not sparking it.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  46. To submitter: Why not cell phones w/ headsets? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you know NexTel lives for these kinds of situations. Get a bunch of NexTels with ample walkie-talkie minutes and then get some headsets. Put the phones on your belt and then either use voice activated talk mode, or the old push-button style. Frankly, I hate half-duplex stuff but it's what you are already used to. The advantage is that you can roam anywhere (not just the gym) and have instant communication. It shouldn't be all that pricey either. They have pay-as-you-go prepaid plans. The school could get a prepaid plan whenever there was a production and then when it was over, collect the phones and leave them in a drawer until they were needed.

    Rather than NexTel, I would recommend getting Cingular or Verizon and then signing up for a plan with unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile minutes. Then get headset and now you have a full-duplex system. I don't know Verizon, but Cingular phones can conference up to six other lines, which is probably enough for a stage crew. And you can all hear and talk to each other. Not sure if there is a prepaid or pay-as-you-go option.

    But anyway, look cellular. I think it's probably the best option for the money, no need to cobble something together that may not be reliable. Cell phone networks rarely go down...if your homebrew solution blows up on curtain night your ass is grass unless your solution also has an "understudy" ready to go.

    -JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  47. License required by jim_deane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can use FRS frequencies with FCC-approved FRS walkie talkies.

    To use any GMRS-exclusive frequencies, you MUST purchase a license from the FCC and use the appropriate call sign and operating procedures.

    GMRS radios are /not/ license free.

    Jim

    1. Re:License required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMRS radios are /not/ license free.

      However, technically, nobody really gives a flying rat fuck. Least of all the FCC.

  48. teamspeak by cRueLio · · Score: 1

    try teamspeak, it can be used instead of VoIP, and each team/crew can have their own private channel...

    try it out: http://www.teamspeak.org

  49. ClearCom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Others have said it before, but I'll reiterate. ClearCom is the way to go. I spent 8 years doing tech theater (4 in HS, 4 in college). Intercom system components get the holy living crap beat out of them and they should be built for the task. Taking a bunch of fragile-ish components into that environment is begging for trouble.

    ClearCom's units are very well made. Some of the ones we used then are still being nursed along some 15 years later by my High School's theater. They're worth the money and they'll last a long time.

    Incidentally, I strongly recommend the WIRED versions. Wireless stuff inevitably runs into intereference problems in the theater with all the lighting and sound equipment generating RF. It works OK for the line of sight apps where a wireless stage mic is broadcasting to a receiver back of house, but get someone into the wings standing near a dimmer pack and watch things go to hell.

  50. GMRS or FRS by eap · · Score: 1

    If by walkie talkies you mean the standard 49 mhz AM kind, I can understand why you have problems. Go with an FM UHF solution. It will be much clearer and you'll be able to communicate over longer distances.

    To solve the interference problem you could use FRS or GMRS radios with CTCSS. As long as you pick a tone no one else in the area is using, you should not hear interference even from others using the same frequency.

    If you go with GMRS, someone will have to get a GMRS license. This is easy to do (no test to take, just pay the FCC), and I think you only have to have one license for an organization. You can then set up a temporary GMRS repeater in your auditorium that will ensure everyone can communicate with everyone else. The advantage of GMRS is that it can use frequencies that your garden variety FRS walkie talkies can't use, so you will get less interference from kids, etc.

    The only problems with the above are that if anyone wants to use the same channels and CTCSS encoding as you, there is nothing to stop them.

    1. Re:GMRS or FRS by Patilla+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      GMRS licenses are only granted to individuals, and only cover the individual's immediate family.

      FRS sounds like the way to go though, especially in a high school theater setting.

      --
      Pat
  51. MOD PARENT +10 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.

  52. Re:Howard Dean is a fucking loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doubtfull and off topic. Suggesting brands of batteries would have been more useful to the readers.

    Off topic, sure. Doubtful? I don't think so. Howard Dean *is* a fucking loser.

  53. Find you local church(es) by bluGill · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll bet there is more than one large church in your town, and each one has wireless gear that they use for services sunday morning, and no other time. Just talk to them in advance and borrow their gear. Most would be more than willing if you ask correctly. (and take care of the equipment)

    Note that there is an art to asking. Best is to have someone in the production (actor, teacher, think outside of tech crew) ask. I'm not sure about much else because as a tech guy I don't know how to ask.

    1. Re:Find you local church(es) by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      We're a catholic school O:-)
      Sadly the services are just wired and wireless mics to speakers, theres no communication between them

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  54. An excellent wired/wireless solution by mdkemp · · Score: 5, Informative
    For a theater group with which I work, I built an inexpensive intercom system that uses standard corded or cordless telephones. The [simple] schematics I used can be found at http://www.epanorama.net/documents/telecom/telepho ne_intercom.html -- just scroll down to the "Theatre intercom circuit".

    Basically, it mimics a standard phone line, and any telephone device you plug in can communicate with the others. You can run long cables and use splitters [nearly] to your heart's content. For about $30-$50 per station (hundreds less than a real, however superior, Clear-Com system), you can purchase corded or cordless headset telephones which work nearly as well.

    If you do that, be sure to get phones with mute capability; and if you go cordless, be sure to check on battery life and try to get phones that don't beep too loudly. You might even need to disassemble the cordless phone and disable the internal beeper to make it silent.

    Two things that are really nice about true Clear-Com systems is that (1) they can be operated silently (i.e., without beeping), and (2) their mute/talk controls can be operated by feel alone -- you don't need to look at a mute LED to determine whether or not you're muted. Those features are hard to come by on unmodified corded and cordless phones.

    In general, a theater intercom system needs to be absolutely reliable, and should also be full-duplex (which walkie-talkies are not, but telephones are). I'd shy away from creating a custom wireless soultion with unproven technology -- it will take much more time to develop and won't be as reliable. If anything goes wrong during a show, or if reception isn't good enough, you've got big trouble.

    1. Re:An excellent wired/wireless solution by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      That is quite possibly the best advice I've seen in this thread yet.

      Considering the reliability of clear-com systems (not very, in my experience...) a system which can use standard telephones would be much better for this situation.

      But that comes from spending way too much time with clear-com hardware and a soldering iron.

    2. Re:An excellent wired/wireless solution by Dramcaff · · Score: 1

      This system would provide you with the best coverage at the price. Another option would be to go towards a more traditional approch using Amateur (HAM) Radio. Although this doesn't allow you to have the duplex capability (nessicarily) it does allow you to have a much better wireless coverage than a cordless phone would. But again you run into cost...

    3. Re:An excellent wired/wireless solution by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      This seams like our most viable solution (the phone circuit)... I'll suggest it to our tehc director tomorrow

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  55. Sprint to Sprint calling by wynlyndd · · Score: 1

    get cellphones that have unlimited sprint to sprint calls. makes sure you get decent signal in the auditorium. get the smallest plan available in your area.

    --
    "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
  56. Front Page Story? by chevybowtie · · Score: 1
    What exactly is the criteria for 'AskSlashdot' quesitons to make the front page. I have seen several 'ask' stories that could have stood on their own on the front but were delegated to the 'askslashdot' section alone - yet not this.

    Honestly, this is worse than a dupe.

  57. telex and clear com by Above · · Score: 1

    In my experience all professional theaters use telex or clear com systems. Wired ones are quite expensive, and prefered as you can get headsets powered from the jack. However, both also make wireless systems that use FM and have quite good quality and range. The wireless systems are not nearly as cheap as walkie talkies, but they are far cheaper than wired systems and will last for years. It may be worth the time and effort to get some approved, or do a fund raiser.

  58. VoIP wireless handsets ... by __aadkms7016 · · Score: 1

    Cisco sells wireless VoIP handsets.

    1. Re:VoIP wireless handsets ... by bstanton0101 · · Score: 1

      Each handset costs $522! Holy shiznit!

      --
      Please excuse my English. I am American.
  59. IPAQs or the equivallent by severed · · Score: 1

    First let me say that there's a lot of good ideas on here with alternative solutions, walkie talkies and whatnot. However, although it was almost a decade ago, I remember what it was like to be in technical theater. Specifically I remember it was great because as a sophomore I could frequently give backrubs to the hottest senior drama cuties. This provided a lot of opportunities for social development that would have been difficult to come by as a loner geek who spent the bulk of his social life on the other end of a 300 buad hayes smart modem (Yeah, I know only about ten years ago, but I was poor too).

    So anyways rock on man.

    Like I said before, I remember what it was like, and it wasn't just about getting the job done as simple as possible. Sometimes it was getting the job done in a really cool way, going over the top, and showing off. I mean, compared to the drama students on the stage, how often does the tech guy get to do that. The techie has a job that if they're doing it right they're not noticed at all. So I can understand your desire to go for the cool solution.

    If I were you, and operating under the above assumptions, I would get my hands on a few IPAQs. They got some decent battery life, good integration with 802.11b, and if I remember properly usb so you can connect a handset. They're relativelylight weight, and you can get some older ones relatively cheap. We're probably talking a semster worth of bake sales, but hey, it's for a good cuase. Plus you can install an IM client on it to do text as well as voice for broadcast directives froma central source. You've got your choice of operating systems to run on it. So if I were you, and wanted cool geek look at what I can do points, that's what I would do.

    Of course, also remember, you can go to any Fry's Electronics, or even Walgreens and pick up about 15 FRS radios that have a range of about a mile, and what 14 channels to choose from for less than 200 bucks. Not a whole lot can go wrong with them, and the tech ability to use them is negligable. I used to play with a live action gaming group (*cringe*) that made extensive use of them. It worked out pretty well, although you will run in to a lot of useless chatter. This solution would probably be just as cool and impressive. It also has the added bonus that people will want their own unit, so you only have to manage a deparmental pool of temp units for those who can't or won't get their own, plus the additional bennefit of probably creating a weird sort of wireless underground at your school.

    But remember, don't forget to offer the backrubs :-)

    --

    HaXXXor.com - Naked Chicks Teach You How To Ha

  60. just use instant messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    choose your host however you want. you don't need voice, it's hard to hear, it's prone to errors, and most tech people can type as fast as talk anyhow. (and with less um's).

  61. Not that helpful a comment but... by Teunis · · Score: 1

    Old high school I went to (North Peace in Fort St John) had a moderately succesful theater going for a few years.
    Took the profits from one of the tours and bought pro theater grade wireless. No idea where to find info on the system they used but it worked (and still works) for them.

    Good luck! There's always a way...

  62. I dated a theatre tech... by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 1

    The whole point of having -wireless- communication is so that you can have your people mobile, and still able to communicate. A wired system does you no good if you're on the grid 40' above the stage, and something breaks elsewhere. This, apparently, happens often.

    1. Re:I dated a theatre tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you're on the grid 40' above the stage during the show, it's probably because something's already broken and you're dealing with it. It's about 100 degrees up there.

      When you get back to the wings, the ASM (on a wired headset) can send you to deal with the next crisis.

    2. Re:I dated a theatre tech... by glk572 · · Score: 1

      You can keep stuff from breaking during preformance just by breaking it ahead of time.

      Kick stuff, I do. It's the best way to find the weak spot's.

      I've actually never had anything really important break during a preformance that there was any thing I could do about it, mabey hit it with a stick, but that's about it.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    3. Re:I dated a theatre tech... by glk572 · · Score: 1

      Plus it's unsafe to take loose objects up to that kind of height, the theatre I work in has a policy that anyone working above the hemp gallery has to empty their pockets, and remove anything that could possably fall down.

      Plus going to the grid during a preformance is a bad idea anyway, it's a good way to screw something up, or get hurt, I don't know about you but I don't like balenceing on beams in the dark, with lot's of aircraft cable, and pullys, all around, especially with people below.

      When you're not in preformance shouting is the best way to comunicate when doing this kind of work.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  63. Intercom system suggestions by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
    First of all, I would ditch your idea of a WiFi intercom system. I think you'd end up spending WAAAAY more money than if you just purchased a professional intercom system.

    The prevailing "standard" (if you want to call it that) is that ClearCom systems are used mainly in fixed locations, like your theater. Telex/RTS (my personal favorite) are used more in remote production trucks and broadcast facilities. I have always found that the RTS is the more versitle and adaptable of the two major players.

    I would suggest that you check out each of these two websites and look at their lower-end products.

    http://www.clearcom.com/ & http://www.telex.com/

    They are still high-quality systems that will give you years of great service, but at a lower price than their full-blown premium systems. Once you find something that fits into your budget, check out eBay to see if they have any pieces, parts, or systems available.

    There are also some great inexpensive no-brand-name systems available out there. You may want to check out Broadcasters General Store or Markertek to see what they may have. Their links are http://www.bgsfl.com/ and http://www.markertek.com/.

    Good luck!

    --
    The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  64. GAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is gay I tell you!!!

  65. CB Radio by wart · · Score: 1

    CB Radio, used by walkie talkies, is a cheap and reliable system that should work well for this purpose. Depending on the actual devices used, you can get pretty good range. I had a 3-channel handheld unit 15 years ago that could easily transmit and receive for up to 5 miles.

    I believe there are about 40 different CB channels that you can use. This would allow you to switch to a different channel if you get interference or pick up unwanted conversations on one particular channel. Some channels are reserved for certain uses (Channel 9 or 11 is emergency use only, Channel 14 is the one most commonly used for single-channel walkie talkies).

    Browse through Radio Shack or some similar electronics store to find one with the features (# channels, range, size) you need. I doubt that the cost would be anywhere near as much as some of the previously mentioned higher-tech solutions.

    1. Re:CB Radio by wart · · Score: 1

      Ok, now that I RTFQ, I see that you are already using walkie talkies. In light of this, I would say that you just need to invest in a newer set that supports more channels and has a better battery.

  66. Cordless phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The performance of cordless phones is awesome these days and they are dirt cheap.

    To use them, put the bases all together in the same place and color code them so the right phone sits on the right base.

    Wire them all in parallel. All the greens go together and all of the reds go together. The positive of the power supply goes to green, the negative goes to red. The power supply is the tricky part. It has to be a high impedance at audio frequencies. The phone company uses a 48 volt battery in series with a large inductor and a 600 ohm resistor. You don't need that much voltage; most cordless phones will work fine on 12 volts. You might include a 100 ohm resistor in series for current limiting. The series inductor is really important because that provides the impedance that keeps your audio from short circuiting through the power supply. You can probably kludge the inductor with one of the windings of a transformer. Use the highest voltage winding on the transformer.

  67. Not PDAs by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Forget about Wifi PDAs. Since Wifi is an always-on data connection, it's inefficient with power. Battery life sucks and you can't get headsets for them. Most have headphone jacks but no microphone jacks.

    Still, if you want to try it XTEN makes a SIP softphone for PocketPC. There's probably ones for Palm OS too.

  68. Cordless phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Use cordless phones. My mother is a theater teacher and my dad runs tech. We use a pbx like unit that lets us connect many phones together and we use a mixture of corded and cordless phones to get the job done. It dosn't get much more inexpensive. Ohh and my advice... the computer stuff always gets banged up when other people use it.. so try to stay away from anything that breaks easy.

  69. Walkie talkies work just fine. by NineNine · · Score: 1

    You're making this too damn complicated. I just bought walkie-talkies that have a 5 mile range, low power usage, and 24 different channels. They work great. Pick a channel that nobody else is using. Simple.

  70. A little late in the game by ciroknight · · Score: 0, Troll

    But why is everyone here trying to answer him with things that aren't in the parameter of the original question? I mean the guy wants to roll his own Wireless communicators, why doesn't someone give him some links to bluetooth equipment, or tell him the electronic issues of this, or even how to convert a pda (running linux of course) into a communicator? These are the kinds of things I would expect.. come on slashdot, you can certainly do better than this...

    p.s. Sorry I couldn't help, i know nothing about Radio communications....

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:A little late in the game by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      But why is everyone here trying to answer him with things that aren't in the parameter of the original question?

      Because the "parameter of the original question", while technically interesting perhaps, and geekily cool, would be the wrong solution for the problem.

      A PC-based solution will cost more and be less flexible, and be more complex, than any simple FRS/GMRS/MURS solution. Not only will there be a very high technical support requirement (e.g., what happens when the PC croaks and you need to install the same software on a new one -- is the guy who designed it still available to help, and can the hardware do what it needs to?) but it will require custom hardware configurations and software. FRS/GMRS is a COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) solution. If you break one radio, you go to the local RS or online to Outpost.com, or any of a hundred other sites, and buy a replacement. Cheap.

      Part of designing a system is to look at the problem, not just assume that the answer needs to be kewl and rad. Sometimes the right answer is the old, obsolete-looking one.

  71. Better Yet. by dracocat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't buy anything. Work on sharing the football team's headsets. They probably have a bigger budget than your theatre department anyways. This should work out as long as you never have a performance during a game, which you should never do anyways!!

    If they don't have one, perhaps its a good time to talk about splitting the cost of one.

  72. Invest in a real system by Krashed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would have to say that your best option would be to invest in the system

    Think about it
    1) The computer crashes.
    2) PortabilityWill you be able to use this everywhere? You probably aren't going to take computers with you if you travel for competitions, and if you do that takes up your setup time.
    3) Lag, you need real time conferencing behind the stage and can't wait even for a second of lag time if something goes wrong.
    4) InterferenceMost people in the audience probably have a cell phone which operates very close to the 802.11b standard of 2.4ghz. You would quite possibly lose signal in that event, and even if just for a momment, you would have to wait till it was over, reconnect the Wifi signal, and restart the voice program.

    Wouldn't it suck if suddenly the system went down? You would have no time to troubleshoot. I was in my high school theatre team and we used a system from Telex. It was awesome. Didn't matter how much noise was around you cause you could hear the voices with no problem and no lag. Just flip on the power unit and plug in. Could even connect multiple units together for cases when you didn't want cables everywhere. We never had a single instance of failure. Do yourself a favor and buy a real system.

  73. ClearCom Third by glk572 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually really like the wired clear com. There are no batterys to buy, and no interfearance.

    The audio quality is as good as anything out there, the system is full duplex, so you can talk over each other. It uses standard xlr cable, so if you have a house snake you can just run it along that.

    Try to get a used system, the equipment lasts forever.

    My only warning about clearcom is to make shure that you don't have any short's in you cables, they can bring down the whold system. Also be cautious running it along with electrical cables, they can induce hum.

    We use clear com during all our major preformances. We back it up with gmrs, wihch is another option, think of gmrs as being super walike talkies, the big benifit of gmrs is that you are assigned your own channel by the fcc, and the range is a few miles.

    The wired clear com is still the standard in the entertainment industry, gmrs is also popular for non preformance comunication, but almost evryone I know of uses wired clear com for preformance.

    Get the most basic clear com unit you can find, and a few headsets, you can expand to more headsets when you need, they'll be available just about forever.

    --
    Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  74. Walkie Talkies are cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any wireless (in the 802.11 sense) solution would be too big or too expensive, if not both. I was just trying to setup Linphone on a GPE Linux driven Ipaq 55xx series 20 minutes ago (still no success: hints welcome!). Once I get it working I'll have a cool piece of technology to play with, but one Ipaq is likely to cost as much as 20 Walkie Talkies!
    Choose the right frequency among the legal ones in your country. If the CB band is as dead there as it is in my country, get some cheap old CB radios, spare rechargeable batteries, slow chargers (fast chargers always shorten batteries life) and you're done.

  75. How to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Use a bunch of Nextel phones.

    2. Use a few newer FRS radios with hands-free sets (http://commerce.motorola.com/consumer/QWhtml/2way _cat.html).
    You probably don't need GMRS-capable ones. Mgr types can have more than one depending, and the newer ones scan their "code channels" also, or you can talk on an open channel.

    Or string some soup cans and string around everything.

  76. Amateur Radio by arrianus · · Score: 1

    You should look into getting ham radio licenses for all your techs, and getting amateur radios. For non-commercial use (high school theater certainly qualifies), those would be perfect. The lowest level license is very easy to get -- simple exam, no morse code. You can buy a book ("Now You're Talking"), and if you read it, you'll ace the test. All the possible questions on the exam are also on-line (www.arrl.org). I cannot overemphasize how easy it is -- I learned what I needed for it in elementary school (higher-level exams are hard).

    That gives you access to HF frequencies, which don't go very far, which for use in theatre is very good (no interference). To clarify, "not very far" means your town, as opposed to hitting stations in Australia and Japan. You may also be able to talk to the local ham community, and get a block of bandwidth for yourselves (there are protocols for doing this in the ham community, and it shouldn't be difficult). The FCC has laws about non-interference, and everyone on the waves is licensed, so you can expect people to respect this.

    Using 802.11 would be both very expensive, unreliable, and cumbursome in comparison. Ham equipment will also last forever -- 802.11 already has a, b, and g, and will presumably have new standards coming out every so often. Every several years, all your equipment will become obsolete. There also aren't very well established standards for sending audio over TCP/IP. What you use now may not exist in a couple years.

    SSB and FM, in contrast, have been here for close to a century, and aren't going away anytime soon.

    You'll also have large numbers of potential suppliers for your equipment, open standards, and all that good stuff. This gives you access to amazing resources if you want to do anything more fancy (repeaters, etc.). You have access to a big block of bandiwidth, so you can switch channels if you want to have an individual conversation with someone. In addition, the equipment is general-purpose. You can use it for anything you'd use an amateur radio for, and other people's amateur radios can interface to you. You also have a very large community of technically inclined people on the waves who would be willing to support you (kinda like GNU/Linux, back in '94 or '95, before there was a mass of people). Hams are (a) friendly (b) helpful (c) constantly complaining about the lack of new blood. They also generally know a heck of a lot (the highest-level license basically requires you to know how to design a radio from scratch).

    I cannot think of many other communications standards that offer all of this. To some extent, CB, but then you're vulnerable to pricks interfering on purpose (if your school is at all like mine was). Then again, if you're school is more civilized, or the dumb people are even dumber, this might not be a problem....

    The only annoyance is that, when you transmit, you need to broadcast your callsign every so often (a series of up to 7 characters; for instance KB7DQQ).

    I definitely wouldn't go for anything digital -- until the standards are better established, you'd find yourself with obsolete equipment very soon.

  77. Use minimum technology necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having worked as a professional lighting designer/director for more than a decade (after starting in high school theatre) the answer is *NOT* to involve computers.

    For fixed positions, (left wing, right wing, green room, lighting sound booths etc.) use *WIRED ANALOG HEADSETS* like those from Chaos Audio (defunct I believe but still widely used) and Clear Comm.

    Buy 'em used if you must but get proper a system but do NOT involve computers. You need this system to be reliable and simple. Lives are at stake. Yes really. As a stage hand you are the first line responders to real emergencies and theatrical events have a way of attracting real emergencies (venues that serve booze even more so).

    General purpose computers *SUCK* for special purpose applications and suck and blow (at the same time!) for realtime special purpose applications.

    (Credit is due for the homage made to: http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/ossuck scable.html~content )

  78. wifi is not good for theatre by z00ky · · Score: 1

    wifi is way too unreliable. if i were you i would not tap into that. it's a waste of time and money. get a wired, used headset system from ClearCom. tried and true method and used almost everywhere.

    --

    ----
    djzooky.com
    I Like Cheese.
  79. This will might work.... by TeslaHz · · Score: 0

    Check NCH' website, they sell software for intercom systems and other audio applications.
    Worth looking into, I think.

    http://www.nch.com.au/index.html

  80. Dont feed the.... by Catskul · · Score: 1

    Way to feed the troll...

    Jackass !

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Dont feed the.... by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      hehe...sorry. it was just really inviting. i had fun ;-)

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    2. Re:Dont feed the.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_
      g_______________________________________________g_ _
      o_/_____\_____________\____________/____\_______o_ _
      a|_______|_____________\__________|______|______a_ _
      t|_______`._____________|_________|_______:_____t_ _
      s`________|_____________|________\|_______|_____s_ _
      e_\_______|_/_______/__\\\___--___\\_______:____e_ _
      x__\______\/____--~~__________~--__|_\_____|____x_ _
      *___\______\_-~____________________~-_\____|____*_ _
      g____\______\_________.--------.______\|___|____g_ _
      o______\_____\______//_________(_(__>__\___|____o_ _
      a_______\___.__C____)_________(_(____>__|__/____a_ _
      t_______/\_|___C_____)/______\_(_____>__|_/_____t_ _
      s______/_/\|___C_____)_______|__(___>___/__\____s_ _
      e_____|___(____C_____)\______/__//__/_/_____\___e_ _
      x_____|____\__|_____\\_________//_(__/_______|__x_ _
      *____|_\____\____)___`----___--'_____________|__*_ _
      g____|__\______________\_______/____________/_|_g_ _
      o___|______________/____|_____|__\____________|_o_ _
      a___|_____________|____/_______\__\___________|_a_ _
      t___|__________/_/____|_________|__\___________|t_ _
      s___|_________/_/______\__/\___/____|__________|s_ _
      e__|_________/_/________|____|_______|_________|e_ _
      x__|__________|_________|____|_______|_________|x_ _
      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_


      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

  81. The obvious quiet solution... by punxking · · Score: 0
    --
    You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
  82. If you have a system for the hearing-impaired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My high school once did "A Chorus Line." The key element of the set was 4, tall, wooden boxes on wheels, three sides of which were covered. A crew member sat in each box and when there was a set change, they rolled out their box and turned it so the correct face was shown to the audience. We needed a way for the stage manager - and, though no one liked him, I must give him credit for essentially choreographing dance routines for four people who couldn't see each other - to talk to the crew in the boxes. Our (rather geeky) sound guy proposed a set of LEDs on a pipe overhead which would flash when it was time to change the set; he offered to build it. Three days before the show, it still wasn't built, but he came in the following day with an alternate solution: the system of the hearing-imparied that had been installed when they renovated the auditorium. He wired a mic directly to it, gave each crew person a headset, worked brilliantly.

    The only problem was that there was no way to turn off the mic, and the stage manager kept eating during the show, offstage... the students in the boxes were ready to kill him by the end.

  83. Re:License required for GMRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a GMRS licensee and HAM operator, I can tell you that the FCC does care but lacks the ability to enforce.

    Among the hundreds of local GMRS licensees who legally paid for their FCC licenses, many actually will find the unlicensed traffic on the exclusive GMRS channels to be very irritating.

    If the unlicensed operation continues, one or more of the local GMRS licensees will eventually get motivated to track you down and shut you down.

    Some GMRS licensees are also highly skilled HAM radio operators with rooms and cars full of radiogeek equipment. A very popular HAM pastime is "fox hunting," wherein multiple mobile teams compete to find the hidden transmitter the most quickly. Don't think for a minute that you can't easily be found. Direction finding is very simple. HAM's do it for sport!

    But from what I've heard over the air, unlicensed operators tend to give away many clues to their identities simply in the content of their conversations anyway.

    Stay legal!

  84. Cordless Phones. by liquidzero4 · · Score: 1

    There are a few manufactueres of household cordless phones that allow phone to phone communication. Basically you can use the hand set as a walkie-talkie to communicate to any other handset that is one the same base.

  85. Actually not a bad idea... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    SMS could be useful during a performence, and just having the crew on speed dial would be easy enough, the only problem i can see would be adressing all the techs at once.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Actually not a bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMS could be useful during a performence,

      During a performance being the main use for this. Otherwise the cheap solution is "walk over to them."

      the only problem i can see would be adressing all the techs at once.

      And in my experience that's a critical flaw. How do you que your spot operators, deck crew, sound guys, and lights all at once? This happens a lot.

    2. Re:Actually not a bad idea... by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if they have this down south (I would imagine so) but here we have Mike wireless service. it is a full cell phone but they also act as walkie talkies over the cell network. Also, a delivery company I worked for used cellular network based dispatching systems with both base stations and hand held units. I looked into the prices of these and they were about $30 a month to rent each (depending on quantities)

  86. OMG you have been sooooo fucking trolled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You deserve a trophy. Perhaps the "Golden Fishhook In My Mouth" award.

    1. Re:OMG you have been sooooo fucking trolled... by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Mwahaha....and did I make you burn _three_ modpoints on me?

      Yep.

      The drop from "excellent" to "good" karma was worth it.

      Anyhow, it sure was fun....heehee. Was it good for you? Sounds like it.

      Right on....you came to troll, I came to flame...nothing like Friday night /.

      Still, you gotta respect the cumstain on nova gag.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    2. Re:OMG you have been sooooo fucking trolled... by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Doh!

      Stupid plaintext post.

      Perhaps I should stop (drinking || posting)

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  87. FRS secure channels, police/fire dept donation? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    If you're already experiencing interference from the local McDs then it sounds like you're already using FRS radios, but did you realize they offer FRS radios with security channels? That should solve the interference problem.

    Best part about FRS: they're extremely cheap. Walmart has several brands for less than $10 each.

    If battery life is a problem I'd recommend getting FRS radios that use as many batteries as possible. 4 AA would obviously last the longest, with 3 AA followed by 4 AAA.

    If that's not enough then get FRS radios that accept a power input, then get a compatible plug at Radio Shack and run a wire to a battery pack belt with enough D batteries to provide enough voltage. D batteries offer quadruple the power (mAh) of AA batteries, so you'll get tremendous battery life. 10 hrs from 4 AA? Try 2 days from 4 D.

    I'd also recommend you contact the police and fire departments for suggestions. They're restricted to a budget (admittedly much larger) and usually get great rates on radios. Perhaps the school and join them in a group buy? Worst that can happen is they'll laugh and hang up, can't hurt to ask, right?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  88. 802.11 in high school... by StriderA · · Score: 1

    I don't have kids yet, but I'm sure when I tell them, "Back in my day, to get on the internet we had to use wires!" they won't believe me.

    As for 802.11... oh man I would have never passed highschool if I had a laptop and a wireless connection there... However I prob wouldn't have sluffed so much to go play L.O.R.D. :)

    --
    "When will this FP stuff stop?" "After the great growing..." "The great growing?" "Yea, when people grow up."
  89. Why not use older /\/\otorola HT by Brymouse · · Score: 1

    A cupple motorola P100's will work just fine, they put out 5 watts on high wich will go about one mile. Also they are capiable of running PL decode so you can eleminate interference on your channel.

    You can pick them up for about 50 to 100 on ebay, or on rec.radio.swap, most of the time with a rapid charger, and a speaker mike. The standard battery is about 1100 mA/h which will last 8-10 hours fully charged. Sure they weigh about a pound, but you can throw them at the wall all day and they will still work! I have droped one from a 50 foot tower, and while the plastic case and battrey was broken, the radio still worked.

    The only problem you may have is programing them, as you need a special cable called a RIB box to interface the computer with them. Polaris radio can set you up for about 100 bux, which is not all that bad.

  90. FRS? by anethema · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm assuming that you people in the USA dont have a band allocated to the FRS?

    Here in Canada, we have something called (you guessed it) FRS. Stands for Family Radio Service. The handsets run for around 25-40 bux canadian. You can usually get them in a pair for 50 dollars. They put out a half watt on vhf(get about a mile of range), and operate in a band allocated ONLY to the frs. There are..14 channels?

    Hm, some quick googling turns up the fact that you DO have frs down there. Other than intermod, there isnt really much interference on the band. If you are using normal walkie-talkies, try some FRS radios. If the channel you are on has interference..switch to one of the others.

    Here is the bandplan from the fcc.

    Here are the radios at Best buy.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  91. HME? Telex? Clear-Com? by seanbird · · Score: 1
    First I would suggest that you just invest in some good quality clear-com wired beltpacks and a bunch of 50' XLR (mic) cables. The cable is easy to find and inexpensive, you can daisy-chain the units, and the powersupply can be located centrally. It's a very good system!

    Lots of people have mentioned that Clear-Com makes a wireless unit. I have found better luck (with range and the battery time) with the HME (http://www.hme.com/) and Telex (http://www.telex.com/telexMain/) wireless units.

    An added bonus is that it will interface with your existing theatre Clear-Com system! So for positions like sound, lights, and front of house who aren't moving much, they can just be using the existing system and you aren't spending money on batteries and unit maintenence. The stage manager, teacher, or general technical director can be on wireless headsets.

    check with rental houses to see if they can sell you their older unit, or if they have any leads on where you can find a discounted unit. Lots of sales places will demo wireless units to prospective buyers, and sell the unit at a discounted price when the new model comes out.

  92. Recycling telephones... by csbaker77598 · · Score: 1

    I found this link over at

    "Use old phones as an intercom"
    http://www.epanorama.net/documents/tele com/telepho ne_intercom.html
    The third circuit was hacked^H^H^H^H^H^Hthrown-together for a theater intercom and using two or more phones. Looks good, looks easy. I don't think it can to the ringing though. And I might use an old computer power-supply for the 12V.

    --
    "The more you sweat on EARTH, the less you bleed in SPACE."
    1. Re:Recycling telephones... by csbaker77598 · · Score: 1

      I should try to finish reading what has already been posted before I open my mouth. mdkemp had already posted that he actually used the schematics that I referenced above. If you don't want to scroll through all of the posts, just search for "An excellent wired/wireless solution" or "mdkemp" on this thread.

      --
      "The more you sweat on EARTH, the less you bleed in SPACE."
  93. WVoIP *sighs* by 1SmartOne · · Score: 1

    I didn't read all of the threads so I apologize in advance if someone already mentioned this. Look into WVoIP. It uses very similar technology as the VoIP systems but you can use wireless headsets. Search Google News for WVoIP. I think that this technology could be useful, considering your current WAN in the school. It uses the same network. Typically on a large scale though it is on it's own network so that the traffic doesn't kill the servers. -Scott

    1. Re:WVoIP *sighs* by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Cisco makes a wireless VoIP phone, IIRC.

  94. Balanced by FreeHeel · · Score: 1, Informative
    When I was in high school, I installed a complete wired intercomm system in our auditorium. I have to echo other posters--go with wired, not wireless. No interference problems, battery issues, etc. (Although even wired intercomms can have interferenced issues if not grounded properly. I still have fond memories of speaking with someone on a cordless phone through our closed-circuit intercomm). Wired units are much cheaper, and a professional system like ClearComm or Telex can be upgraded to add wireless units later. Get an intercomm system designed for theater and you will be much happier. Most of the cost of rolling your own system will be the cost of the beltpacks and hardware. Plus, you will want it to be full duplex, and you won't want to share a network like 802.11. Don't forget that internet routing is best effort delivery--and you don't want to lose packets on an intercomm system!! Start small--get a base station for the control booth or stage manager and get a few beltpaks for sound, lighting, spots, and possibly stage crew. Then you can add more units later as your need and your funding increases. To do it right, sit down and plan your ideal system (if funding were no issue), and then decide on a subset to purchase based on your current funding. Take your plan to the administration and sell it as an extensible system that can grow over the years. Next year you can go back to your master plan and figure out what you need next. Also, take the time to plan your infrastructure right. If you install a versatile system with plenty of wall jacks located throughout the facility, you won't have to string cables all over the place for every show. Put wall plates all around the stage, in the middle and rear of the house, in the foyer (if you have one), balcony (if you have one) stage wings, control booth, green room, dressing rooms, and the lighting dimmer/audio amplifier cage. For a smaller facility like mine (we had about 500 seats w/ balcony), 2 channels of intercomm is probably plenty (pro systems come in 2- and 4-channel flavors).

    Considering ClearComm vs. Telex, I would go with Telex. It is compatible with ClearComm (unbalanced), but more importantly, it is balanced, so you will have less noise in the system. Also, the standard connectors are balanced 3-pin XLR, meaning they are compatible with balanced audio cables (However, I would buy a separate set of cables for intercomm use, and make them a different color, like blue - Clark Wire & Cable. This makes it easier to identify which cables are audio and which are intercomm and also ensures you won't use a beat-up intercomm cable for audio!). Also, Telex beltpacks are more rugged (metal, not plastic), and they look better! Look at Full Compass for intercomm hardware. They have good prices. Hope some of this is useful.

    FreeHeel

  95. 802.11x VoIP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is really quite silly.. Trying to fit a square peg in a round hole if you ask me. Hardware Costs (size, weight, and battery life), software implementation, bandwidth, interferance and QoS limitations would make me think twice about utilizing 802.11 for a "simple" walkie-talkie.

    How about using a technology everyone already has? Like.. a CELL PHONE..

    Hell Nextel even has the "Walkie Talkie" feature.

  96. I think: by atheken · · Score: 1

    Well, asside from the "My high school, like most others, has a Theater program (Which I assure you is not the case) AND the fact that you're invovled in said program. I will offer some help.... I think CISCO is releasing some kinda VoIP phone which runs on 802.11b/g handsets. They were like 200-500 bucks I think, but would do the job great I think.

  97. The only way to do this is the right way by MikeLRoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, let me preface this by saying that i have worked building large-scale theater shows, and as a lighting designer for 7 years. I have worked on shows including the Lion King, Cher, Phanton of the Opera, Miss Saigon, Tim McGraw, the Pan American Games, as well as numerous regional and touring theater shows and outdoor festivals.

    Quite literally the only thing these shows have in common is the need for clear, reliable crew communications. During setup/strike (installation/teardown), crews usually have portable radios (Motorola Walkie-talkies generally), so everyone can keep in touch without shouting or running around looking for each other. Essential for big shows, unnecessary but nice for small one. However, for all shows, only "Clearcom" communications are used.

    Clearcom is a brand-name of wired "party-line" communications sets. It's used generically for other brand systems, like Telex, HME, etc. It's the same thing you see camera operators on TV shoots wearing. Everyone has a headset and beltpac, and can talk to one another on a common "channel". Everything is hard-wired, and everything works, all the time, every time. The systems is used for calling show cues, as well as any other necessary communication during showtime.

    However, the "wired" issue becomes a problem for some people. While audio and lighting techs can often stay put (they sit behind a board), stagehand/stage managers have to be mobile, often on stage. Usually they need to be able to communicate in a high-noise environment, and it must work reliably.

    The only way to do this is via a wireless clearcom system. Telex, HME, and Clearcom are the big three, and all of their systems are inter-operable. I personally like HME's RadioComm, but all systems have their own benefits. Simply put, these systems are expensive but necessary. For a school situation, you can probably get away with 2 wireless stations, and 4 wired. But you can't cheap out on this. You need great headsets, and equally good beltpacs to go with them. When you're midshow, and you can't hear your cue, you'll know why.

    I hope this helps. I realize that you were looking for a cheap way around the problem, but there isn't one. You'll find that with 95% of things in theater, cheaping-out never works. You buy a crappy light, or sound equipment, or cleacom, and life sux but things go on. You cheap out on rigging or construction, and people die. It's as simple as that.

    -Michael Roy

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  98. Clearcom by n1ugl · · Score: 2, Informative

    My school always used Clear-com's. They're not incredibly cheap, but certainly better than a PC. You also don't need to go all out and get a real base station...the portable one does nicely. BenFranske is right that people need to be all over the place, but they don't always have to be connected. We had someone on each side of the stage, the people running the boards, and the stage manager all connected. The stations are wired together, but it shouldn't be hard to find someone to run the XLR for you, or you can just run it through your normal audio snake.

  99. A few notes by reidab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my high school theatre we have a clear-com system that we use for general communication but there are times on our larger productions in which it simply will not do. To remedy this, a friend and I hacked together a system by which to patch our clear-com output into our assisted listening devices. After completing this, we could give our stage crew boxes which would allow them to hear anything that went on on headset. We have two wireless microphones (1 lav, 1 handheld) which we gave to important crew members and patched their output back into the clear-com system. This allowed them to have two-way wireless communication using our existing equipment. Aside from that, I have had mixed luck with FRS depending on the space (all used on small productions). Another idea, if you are wanting to have use computers for this solution would be to install terminals on the sides of the stage which would run a custom software solution that would display cue information upon receiving commands from the stage manager. (I almost built this last year.) Also, a simple IRC system would work as well if you wanted text-based messaging but other than that, I think that a dedicated communications system would do you good.

  100. Slight misappliance of science. by vik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I'm fairly sure that some variant or successor to 802.11* will be the norm for wireless phone handsets one day, I don't think now is a good time to solve that problem with it.

    Soon there will be 802.11-enabled mobiles in common use and all those base stations will make an awesome ad hoc network, but until then I'd suggest PRS handsets and headsets with VOX to save power.

    If anyone is interested, I've developed a concept for sharing browser caches over LANs to speed up the access of all members here.

    Vik :v)

  101. Amateur vs. CB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CB gives you 4 watts. Amateur radio gives you 1000 watts. If there are any concerns about range...

    CB requires no license. Amateur does. The amateur license is pretty easy, but may still be an additional hassle. If you get someone certified Extra in the school, they can administer the exam, so it should no longer be a problem.

    You are much more likely to get interfence on CB (truckers passing by, etc.) Some fairly rude.

    Amateur lets you set up fairly arbitrary more complex things (communications control room, digital data, etc.). CB allows some of this, but with a lot less flexibility.

    CB is unlimited in what you can do on it. Amateur is limited to non-commercial use, and has other restrictions as well (although none that I can think of directly relevant to theatre use) .

    Amateur radio license looks good on a college application, especially if you're doing anything tech. It makes it look like you have a useful hobby :)

    Ham standards are more modern (FM, rather than AM, so less noise/clearer signal).

    http://www.murrah.com/ham4/ is a good link comparing the two.

    It'd be good to what extent, if any, FCC regulations would consider school use "institutional." I don't think this is likely to be a problem, but worth a looksee.

  102. Theatre war stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked in several theatres where we used the 2 watt gmrs radios and we never had any problems with interfeatance.

    you only move your speakers every 6 weeks what a sweet deal, I've had to move several hundred pounds of sound equipment up to 10 times a week and chase around a thousand conferance atendees to keep them from trashing our theatres, not to mention walking uphill to work bouth ways in the snow bare foot, in the rain.

    I've even had a group of 800 christian evangelists in our 700 seat concert hall, we nearley called the poliece to have them thrown out. They even riped one of the lobby doors off it's hinges, pushing to get into the building.

    I worked a concert in september where during a heavy rainstorm, the first real rain of the season, part of the celing of our lobby caved in from a leak in the roof.

    One of my fellow M.E.'s (we have 4, to cover our 6 preformance spaces) insist's that a circut exists where it dosen't and I've spent a great deal of time running up and down flights of stairs to figure out what the problem is. I've had to fix this several times, as this M.E. is lazy and has his Assistant (who would never point our this error) run all his hang's.

    I've been called into work right before a show, to fix a dammed fourty year old efects spot light. That would be pretty normal, exept that I wasen't working that show, and only got called beceause they coulden't find thir M.E. I later found out that he left town and didin't tell anyone, and they coulden't get ahold of his Assistant. This still woulden't be a big deal exept that I was stoned off my ass. So there I was high as a kite trying to fix this dammed light, with the house open, and the light board operator standing over my sholder looking like a moron. I still coulen't fix the dammed thing and had to tell them that they would have to run without the light for the night, what I should have told them over the phone to start with.

    (Master Electrician, a major univeristy on the west cost (this turned into a bitch rant.))

  103. Re:Howard Dean is a fucking loser by olorinpc · · Score: 1

    It is probably true... the political comments were what i was saying was off topic... not whether or not a particular person was good or bad.

  104. Stick with the Telex/Clear-com by darkjedi521 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The technical director at my college just switched us from a 15 year old clear com system starting to show its age to a set of Motorola talkabouts. All of us hate them and use the clear coms when he is not around since we prefer them for the headsets and the fact that we don't have to worry about batteries . Full duplex is also a great feature except when everyone is trying to shout each other down.

  105. My Idea by concordeonetwo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work on my schools television station. Anything big like recording the school plays we usually do FRS radios. I've seen other setups use the unused 2-pairs of wire in the CAT5 network ports in the school as the local loop in a homebrew intercom system.

  106. Motorola talkabouts by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use those Motorola radios that get like 1 mile range. They're like $50 for a pair plus $10 for some headsets to plug in. That's what most high school theaters use, cause they're cheap, work well and are simple to operate.

  107. PTT Cell phones? by halo1982 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get your school on a multiline phone plan with low minutes but unlimited push to talk...long distance walkie talkie that no one can look in on and you won't pick up anyone else's stuff...maybe you could do 4 phones for around $100 a month? That still might be too much, but with free or discounted equipment the initial cost shouldn't be too much, maybe around $600, with a monthly fee. Sprint, Verizon, and Nextel all offer unlimited PTT...(that is if phones would even work in your theatre)

  108. OMG you're such a fucking tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

  109. agreement by lophophore · · Score: 1

    Use the old phone trick. The parts are cheaply obtained, and not likely to get stolen. Plus, it works very well. The only downside is that you have to hold onto the handset. But there are solutions to that problem, as well.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  110. This is easy by andrewjj20 · · Score: 1

    get ham lisences for all of the tech crew, and as long as it is non profit i think that you should be able to do it. then radios will cost less and have more power.

  111. Challenge by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being a geek is a good thing. But it doesn't mean that you have to make things more complicated than they need to be.

    You obviously need voice communication without (expensive) signalling. So analog voice will do just fine. Forget computer or networking based ideas, going there is only going to sidetrack you from your goal. Remember that this is about getting your theater group to communicate, not about playing with geek toys.

    Someone here has already mentioned 49 MHz headsets. Radio Shack and Maxon are common brands and those should work great for you. But if you need something with a little less interference then......

    FRS, or Family Radio Service is another option. The radios are fairly inexpensive and can be had for $30 each or so. They offer multiple channels and CTCSS tones (if you don't know what that means either RTFM or get back to me, it's worth your time to understand it). Those should give you the range you're looking for. You won't get interference from businesses there, that frequency band is for non-commercial use. And if you do find someone interfering then gather information and turn them in to the FCC and your interference problem is gone.

    Beyond that you could go for commercial land mobile gear. It works like FRS but you have to license a channel. You do get a lot more power and range. The drawback is that the school will have to apply for a license and that takes time. You'll have to budget $300 on up for each radio with the accessories you'll want.

    If it were me I would try FRS first, a trial run with a couple of borrowed radios.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Challenge by Torgus+Dragon · · Score: 0, Troll

      your all gay. especially you theater fags. go lik sum ass. my 1st post on slashdot and its lame.

  112. RF in Production Environments - Just say No! by justincheetah · · Score: 1

    mu_wtfo raises an excellent point regarding RF from wireless gear getting into equipment. 5 watts is enough to smoke a television -- literally. Accidently fried the soft power on a green room monitor with a 3 watt radio years ago. Even low output consumer wireless gear will present problems. For example, in the consumer space, GSM cellphones are especially problematic. They'll cause RFI headaches in nearly anything electronic. My video production organization needed to ban all RF emitting equipment from the production truck after GSM phones caused audio and video interferance during several live feeds.

  113. What about 5.8 ghz intercom phones by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

    they have great range, long battery life, and are private on whatever setup you have. Assuming you have less than about 6 people.

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  114. Theatre Sound E-Mailing List by The+Mainframe · · Score: 1

    You may want to ask this question on the theatre-sound mailing list. This list has a broad and diverse membership, ranging from high school theater buffs (like you) to freelance reinforcement companies (like me) to the guys who actually build the hardware (like two of the techs at Cadac). Here's your link:
    http://www.brooklyn.com/theatre-sound/

    --
    --Bennett Prescott
    Former Lord Of Packets
  115. In my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used flourescent tape to make signals in the dark backstage! And we still do!

  116. nextels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just get a few nextel phones and have the phone functionality disabled. they work great and aren't too expensive. you may be able to work out a deal with your local nextel provider.

  117. $50 Cordless phones vs $500 computers by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yup. You can get phones in the 900 MHz or 2400 MHz bands, so pick the one with less interference (and they're usually spread-spectrum, which is already a good start.) Just be careful about battery charging - my home Panasonics have really bad batteries for an otherwise nice 5-handset network.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  118. Spread-Spectrum vs. channel-based systems. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Channel-based systems are easy to tap. Spread-spectrum is much harder. (It'd be basically impossible, except that US eavesdropping laws limit the frequency-hopping rates to something the Feds can tap, but that's still beyond your average advanced hobbyist.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  119. Vocera Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $20k for the Vocera server
    $400 per "communication badge" aka transceiver

    So you have a LAN with a bunch of wireless access points on it. Add a Vocera server to the LAN ($20k) and a bunch of wireless transmitters (they call them "badges") at $400 a piece. The badges are 4.2"x1.4", have an LCD screen for text messages and alerts, and use voice-activated "natural language" dialling: "Conference John Doe and Jane Smith" for example.

    Actually sounds pretty cool, but I couldn't find anything regarding battery life of the badges, or what their maximum effective range to AP is.

    What would it take to build an open-source kit for something similar: server software (the easy part I'd guess) and some sort of cheap circuit-board kit with a PCMCIA slot (for WiFi cards), build-in mic, mic jack, built-in speaker, headphone jack, microprocessor. The LCD screen for text messages seems cool, but could be an add on.

    How about "freerange.org"? Nope, they build timber buildings. Let's see... okay, I suck at this. Somebody else can come up with a name.

  120. FRS/GMRS by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    Assuming that "Walkie Talkies" means the old AM CB kind, you should find that using more modern FRS, or preferably the more powerful GMRS (your school should have no problem getting the license), radios should solve your problem.
    I use the motorola FRS radios every time I go anywhere outside the US, and my wife and I have no problem contacting each other in Hotels, malls, airports, etc.
    Compare prices here: http://www.nextag.com/All~frs+gmrs+radioz0zB4zmain z5-htm

  121. RFI by jaf1230 · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if anyone else has had the problem that I (personally) have had: if I have my headset on, and am at the sound board, I usually get RFI from the board, even with my hands hovering 6 inches over it. I'm not sure whether or not other people can hear it, and I can't test it because I am no longer part of the crew. However, I know that the interference was loud, and quite painful. As I didn't have my own copy of the script (I don't know what the stage managers were thinking...), I needed the headset desperately to hear my cues. As I was sound manager and we have a buggy system, I desperately need my hearing the best it can be to detect feedback before it is detected by the audience. You don't know how bad it is when I hear feedback now, after not having been on the show for over a year. I'm like a war veteran. Unfortunately, due to personal conflicts with the director of crew, I am no longer on the crew. He doesn't know what he's missing by not having me there. I'm serious. New guy, didn't have a clue what he was doing. He was arrogant, and acted like he knew what he was doing. I couldn't stand him, so I left. This was his first show and around my seventh. I knew exactly what I was doing, and he wouldn't listen to a thing I said. Unfortunate, considering I knew the wiring to the lights and sound, I knew the light board like the back of my hand having run it for several years, and I knew sound pretty well. Also, everyone that knew what was going on (ex sound-running-student and the old stage directors) all left, so I think that the manager is completely on his own. Sorry for the attached rant though.

    --
    SIG 666 - Signature stolen by the devil
  122. Why share with football when there are cue lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, performances don't usually overlap with football games... but as a former high school athlete/theatre tech, I can tell you that REHEARSALS and PRACTICES overlap all the time! If the school has money, get the ClearCom... if the school doesn't, why hasn't anyone suggested a system of CUE LIGHTS??? Just a simple row of on/off switches and a bunch of red and green lights???