Slashdot Mirror


User: Paradise+Pete

Paradise+Pete's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,201
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,201

  1. Re:Convenience and Brand Allegiance on Ask Slashdot: Why Would Anyone Want To Spend $1,000 on a Smartphone? · · Score: 1

    You.... spend this much per day on coffee?

    It was the $2-$3 per day for service that got me. The US cell industry is crazy. I pay $12 a month 5GB of data and unlimited talk and SMS. And the 5GB rolls over, as I personally never get close to using it. If I needed "unlimited" I could get that plan for about $30.

  2. Re:But 725$ for a Samsung is OK! on Ask Slashdot: Why Would Anyone Want To Spend $1,000 on a Smartphone? · · Score: 1

    The $725 is misleading. Their flagship Note 8 goes for over $900.

  3. Re:Samsung makes iphones on Ask Slashdot: Why Would Anyone Want To Spend $1,000 on a Smartphone? · · Score: 1

    Samsung is rumored to make $110 on the iPhone X, because of the OLED display and battery, mainly.

    And by "make" they mean revenue, not profit. Those displays are not cheap to manufacture.

  4. Re:But 725$ for a Samsung is OK! on Ask Slashdot: Why Would Anyone Want To Spend $1,000 on a Smartphone? · · Score: 1

    iPhones hold their value well, though. A two year old phone typically recovers more than half its cost when selling, which is pretty good considering it gets used every day many times per day.

  5. Re:But 725$ for a Samsung is OK! on Ask Slashdot: Why Would Anyone Want To Spend $1,000 on a Smartphone? · · Score: 2

    And the Apple two year payment plan is interest-free and the phone comes unlocked. So why not? And it comes with the option of trading it in after one year. I suspect, though, that that is going to cause some friction among Apple's most loyal buyers, because the X is not going to ship in quantity for some time, and so the trade in makes little sense economically as they'd have paid for perhaps 15 months already. i wouldn't be surprised if Apple makes some sort of accommodation there.

  6. Re: a guard problem, too on US Prisons Have a Cellphone Smuggling Problem (nbcnews.com) · · Score: 2

    More of the idiotic one line posts from this turkeydance moron. Why doesn't this clown get modded down?

    Mod down for what? Laziness? It's not off-topic, it's not redundant.

  7. So you're not disputing the dangerous lunatic part?

  8. Re:Significant figures and conversion precision on Dubai Proposes Giant Simulated Mars City In the Desert (newatlas.com) · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that was sarcasm.

  9. Re:Significant figures and conversion precision on Dubai Proposes Giant Simulated Mars City In the Desert (newatlas.com) · · Score: 1

    Technically it's 18 hectares. It is quite a nifty system though.

    I wasn't converting, I was quoting the original source of the information, which gave the land area as 17.5 hectares.

  10. Re:Ancient aliens on Ancient Papyrus Finally Solves Egypt's 'Great Pyramid' Mystery (newsweek.com) · · Score: 2

    Everyone knows the only way the pyramids could have been built was with the help of ancient aliens.

    Why would the aliens necessarily be ancient? Maybe they were just alien kids playing with blocks, and now that they've grown up they've moved on to other worlds.

  11. Re:Fake News on Ancient Papyrus Finally Solves Egypt's 'Great Pyramid' Mystery (newsweek.com) · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    i.e. exercising their Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

    Nobody's saying they should go to jail or have the government stop them. But free speech does not mean there can be no consequences. If the NFL wanted to fire them they could, within the bounds of whatever their contract is. They also can choose to not do anything or even support it. But that has nothing to do with their "Constitutional Right of Free Speech".

    The people saying it's disrespectful are also exercising their rights. For what it's worth, I think they don't understand, or choose not to understand, what the players' protest is actually about. And for what its worth I think Trump is a dangerous lunatic who should not be in charge of anything. But defending the players by saying "it's their right" is missing the point.

  12. Re:Steve Jobs made one really HUGE mistake. on Apple is Really Bad At Design (theoutline.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    He didn't teach anybody to approach problems the way he did.

    He set up an internal university.

  13. Re:Yes, we're getting fucked on If Data Is the New Oil, Are Tech Companies Robbing Us Blind? (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 2

    Now, have there been six extinctions or only five? To tell you the truth, in all this evolution I've kinda lost track myself.

  14. Re:The bottom line is on If Data Is the New Oil, Are Tech Companies Robbing Us Blind? (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    that there are ways of paying for things other than parting with cash.

    So paying then. The poster didn't mention cash, you did. And then you used your own extrapolation to explain why the poster is so naive. I'd say the lack of basic understanding is not quite where you placed it.

  15. Re:The bottom line is on If Data Is the New Oil, Are Tech Companies Robbing Us Blind? (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    When I turn on the radio, I'm the product? How?

    The real question is just how many seconds after hitting the Submit button did you realize that is not a good example?

  16. Re:Who said this? on If Data Is the New Oil, Are Tech Companies Robbing Us Blind? (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    Unlike oil, data has little intrinsic value, it's only good if you can do something with it

    Without data there is no science. And oil too is only good if you can do something with it.

  17. Re:Yes, we're getting fucked on If Data Is the New Oil, Are Tech Companies Robbing Us Blind? (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    The dinosaurs are lucky; they aren't around to give a shit that they're being sold for profit.

    I'll bet they don't feel lucky.

  18. Re: My iPhone SE is like butter on iOS 11 on iOS 11 Is Causing Massive Battery Drain Problems (betanews.com) · · Score: 1

    If it's an old saying, it was stupid when first said, and stupid now.

    Got a bee in your bonnet, do you?

  19. Re:We'll never run out of douchebag futurists on Ray Kurzweil Explains Why Technology Won't Eliminate Human Jobs (fortune.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It assumes an equal amount of social or intellectual positions will be eventually created and some smooth transition of the working populace to these new careers.

    Plus it assumes that people will be smart enough and capable enough to actually do those jobs. I think we're already bumping up against that ceiling. The machines are going to take over and there's no stopping it. Humans will just be a tiny blip on the evolutionary landscape.

  20. Re:Solution. on Civilian Drone Crashes Into a US Army Helicopter (nypost.com) · · Score: 1

    Not a very good one anyway.

  21. Re: Like letting an Uber driver in your home on Walmart Wants To Deliver Groceries Straight To Your Fridge (consumerist.com) · · Score: 2

    Look, this isn't an argument.

  22. Re: Apple Watch LTE on Apple Admits To Apple Watch LTE Problems Just Before It Ships (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    Oh, just adding to the list of dishonest marketing. Nothing more than that.

    Do fitbit or any of the other device makers mention wrist tattoos? Does anyone? Have you posted about that somewhere?

  23. Re: Windows Hello on 'Dear Apple, The iPhone X and Face ID Are Orwellian and Creepy' (hackernoon.com) · · Score: 1

    good point. Didn't; occur to me, because...who gets phone calls anymore? But you're right. However, since clearly the third state is already in there and supported, Apple just needs to (and should) make it a three state switch for each of bluetooth and wifi.

  24. Re:government or technology restriction? on Super-Accurate GPS Chips Coming To Smartphones In 2018 (ieee.org) · · Score: 1

    I had always heard the lower accuracy from gps was a government imposed restriction or limitations of the protocols not a technical one. is that simply an old myth?

    It used to be true. It wasn't a secret, and discontinued in 2000.

  25. The stink of Android desperation is all over these silly objections lately.
    First of all nobody's being photographed. It's an IR sensor on the front of the phone. Second, nobody walking past can cause it to unlock. Not even the owner of the phone can do that. Third, your 50,000 number is wrong. It's 1,000,000, and that's for a person actually attempting to unlock it.