Slashdot Mirror


User: Russ+Nelson

Russ+Nelson's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,476
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,476

  1. How can error be "Insightful"? on Microsoft Flirts with Open Source · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has authored original works and put them under an open source license. So how can saying the opposite be moderated "Insightful"? Sheesh.

  2. Re:Lack of threading is a benefit. on Tanenbaum-Torvalds Microkernel Debate Continues · · Score: 1

    Mutexes and semaphores doth not make a program buggy.

    Some things are simply hard to use. Hard to use means hard to get correct. Hard to get correct means that, with a finite effort available to invest, there will be more bugs in threaded code than in non-threaded code.

  3. Re:Barely as fast as ISDN on Electric Companies Get Involved With Broadband · · Score: 1

    I have a mole in the corporation.

  4. Re:uKernels are unnecessary for anything not embed on Tanenbaum-Torvalds Microkernel Debate Continues · · Score: 1

    Oh, please, don't remind me how old I am!

  5. Lack of threading is a benefit. on Tanenbaum-Torvalds Microkernel Debate Continues · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The other big issue is a lack of threading support.

    Threading is the spawn of the Solaris. Oops, I mean the devil. Forking was so slow on Solaris that they had to invent threading to have multiple contexts run at any speed. The whole point behind a microkernel is to HIDE information. Threading EXPOSES information between separately running processes, so you need to have mutexes, semaphores, and all of that synchronization crap that makes for buggy code.

    Threading is bad. Don't use it. When you have to use code that uses it, refactor the code to use processes or a state machine. It can be done. Don't whine. But don't use threads either.

  6. Re:Don't get your hopes up on Sony Hints At PS3 'Homebrew' Linux Plans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sony is terminally stupid. The problem is that they are of two minds about everything. One part of the company makes bit-copying hardware, and the other part sells bits. There's nothing they can do that will please themselves, so everything they do is a bad compromise between making it easy to copy bits and making it hard.

  7. Re:Cause and Effect? on Mobile Phone Transmitter Causes Brain Tumours? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd call seven brain tumours in one building a heck of a link...

    Actually, no. Enough people get cancer that you'll see groups of people with cancer from time to time. Doesn't mean that anything about the building caused the cancers. As Freeman Dyson points out, you can expect something with a one in a million chance to happen to you every year. See, miracles *do* happen!

  8. Re:Misleading summary on Sarbanes-Oxley Costs Exceed Benefits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nobody is saying that SarbOx has no benefits. Everybody is saying that SarbOx is too expensive for the benefits it returns.

  9. Re:Barely as fast as ISDN on Electric Companies Get Involved With Broadband · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone settle for this kind of service while the rest of the world gets 100Mbps ethernet to their premise or even better fiber at gigabit/sec rates?

    Ambient Corporation does 200Mbps on its new X2 product, with gig fiber or Ethernet or Wifi drops to the house.

    This radio signal radiates from the power line on most HF and low VHF frequencies causing severe and harmful interference to other radio services.

    Ambient's product notches out the HF and VHF bands.

    I understand that you're hostile to BPL, but that doesn't excuse ignorance.

  10. Is 200Mbps enough for you? on Electric Companies Get Involved With Broadband · · Score: 1

    Ambient Corporation is shipping its new X2 system. Runs at 200Mbps on the backbone. Has gig fiber, Ethernet, and Wifi interfaces. Runs Linux. Oh, and a few dozen of them would make a great Beowulf cluster.

  11. Re:Municipal Power & Fiber on Electric Companies Get Involved With Broadband · · Score: 1

    They're saving makeready costs. They just put all-dialectric fiber closer to the electric wires, rather than having to pay the telephone and cable companies to move their stuff around.

    (Dang. I surrounded that with a <speculation> tag, and slashdot just deleted it, rather than presenting it as plain text.)

  12. Re:never go wrong with a union on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    http://opensource.org/

    Any questions?

  13. Re:The Cry of the Socialist on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    Socialism is the system in which the means of production are owned collectively by the citizenry of a country, not by a single individual.

    Um .... would you like a clue? Nobody (except perhaps you) has used that meaning in, oh, say, the last sixty five years; ever since the Austrians won the calculation debate.

  14. Re:You know... on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    True! However, what mechanism do you think unions used to gain their monopoly over labor? Do you think it was freely arranged through voluntary peaceful measures such as a free market encourages? Or do you think that union thugs beat the crap out of anybody who refused to join? Nahhhhh, that's never happened. Or, if it did, nobody ever wrote a folk song about it.

  15. Re:More readable version (first post, quit snicker on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    Yes! Paradoxically, if it's easier to fire workers, employers will be more willing to hire them. So yes, the French reform of the rules restricting firing of young workers were a job creation measure. They would have succeeded had the young workers not fucked themselves.

  16. Re:Union: No thanks on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    historic effects of the labor movement,

    You are making an error in logic. It's called post hoc ergo propter hoc. Just because unions were present when these benefits became available, that doesn't imply that unions actually caused them.

  17. Re:Geeks dont break legs. on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    Gasp! You don't mean to imply that unions gain their monopoly over labor using VIOLENCE, you you??

  18. Re:Heck no. on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    One of the better high schools on Long Island is the Baldwin Union-Free School District. No teachers union to protect bad teachers.

  19. Re:capitalist pig speaking on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    The workers control the means of production! It's the fricking socialist dream! You want that and free doughnuts too?

    That deserves to go in somebody's file of wise quotations.

  20. Re: IT is just too different for Unions on Tech Workers of the World Unite? · · Score: 1

    And whose fault is this? Take responsibility for your position in life. If life deals you shit, pile it up and make fertilizer.

  21. Re:This is not a troll.......... on The NSA Knows Who You've Called · · Score: 1

    I want the word free taken off all anthems, pledges, etc.

    We've already taken Liberty off our coins, and replaced her with pictures of pretty politicians. Bad idea.

  22. Re:Terrorist threat is minimal on The NSA Knows Who You've Called · · Score: 1

    (Score: 10) Damn Insightful

  23. Re:haha on The NSA Knows Who You've Called · · Score: 1

    they hate us because of our freedoms!

    Who does? The U.S. Government? First, let's confiscate all the guns. Killing the lawyers can wait.

  24. Re:Six Degrees of Separation Test on The NSA Knows Who You've Called · · Score: 1

    how long until they use this information for the "War on Drugs?"

    They've been using this type of information for the WoD for decades. I expect that most of the impetus for this program came from drug warriors -- who, after three decades of constant war against the American populace, have gotten pretty good at spying on Americans.

  25. Re:Umm... on Small Cable Groups Seek To Break Net Neutrality · · Score: 1

    What, is EMusic down today? Haven't ever been to YouTube? Never downloaded an ISO of Linux? It's so easy to become informed and yet you remain ignorant. Sad, so sad.