Slashdot Mirror


Sony Hints At PS3 'Homebrew' Linux Plans

simoniker writes "Talking to the Japanese press, Sony executive Izumi Kawanishi has illuminated some of his company's PlayStation 3 Linux plans, indicating that it will be possible for individual 'homebrew' coders to create playable content for PS3, something actively blocked for Sony's PSP handheld. He commented: "Other then game studios tied to official developer licenses, we'd like to see various individuals participate in content creation for the PS3"."

128 comments

  1. Don't get your hopes up by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

    PS2 linux failed because:

    1) Sony crippled it and didn't give anything close to direct access to hardware, meaning very little hardware acceleration
    2) Sony charged a big chunk of change to "buy" linux support

    And Sony is actively trying to kill off PSP homebrew. So don't get your hopes up!

    1. Re:Don't get your hopes up by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sony is terminally stupid. The problem is that they are of two minds about everything. One part of the company makes bit-copying hardware, and the other part sells bits. There's nothing they can do that will please themselves, so everything they do is a bad compromise between making it easy to copy bits and making it hard.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Don't get your hopes up by _egg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's funny, since they shipped the hardware manuals with the kit and even gave a "sample" implementation of OpenGL in PSGL. AFAIK the only hardware they didn't give access to was the IOP, hardly the performance-sensitive piece of the kit. Are you sure you're not slinging second-hand, inaccurate information?

    3. Re:Don't get your hopes up by chamacd · · Score: 1

      Much the same way as the original PlayStation "Yaroze" program failed. Apart from the high cost of hardware and program enrollment ($700 USD if I recall), no direct hardware access was provided for. You were limited to linking functions to rapidly aging libraries on the boot disc which could never be upgraded. Throw in the world's most sparse documentation and you've got an exercise in masochist programming.

      I am not terribly thrilled about Sony's plans for homebrew software development on the PS3, but it would be nice if they could get it right the third time around.

  2. Fool me once! by Inoshiro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ken Kutaragi will not get a cent from me.

    The PS2 was supposed to support Linux. How many homebrewers bought the PS2 dev kit and actually had success?

    How about the amazing no-show on the PSP?

    And now the PS3 is supposed to be friendly? It'd be cheaper to buy a MacMini and howebrew up something for Ubuntu or OS X than the Sony PS3.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Fool me once! by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      So Linux support should sell an extra what, three units?

      Good on Sony.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  3. This will change everything! by Evangelion · · Score: 5, Funny


    Remember how PS2 homebrew development exploded when the PS2 Linux kit came out? Remember how many new and exciting independant games were released for the PS2?

    This is going to be awesome.

    1. Re:This will change everything! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember how PS2 homebrew development exploded when the PS2 Linux kit came out? Remember how many new and exciting independant games were released for the PS2?


      Actually, I think Sony was entirely successful in their goal--of dissuading hackers. I don't think they ever really cared to create a homebrew scene.

      Linux-on-xbox was a big deal for a while, because microsoft was...uh...discouraging it. However, there was never any big linux-on-PS2 movement...because you could buy it from Sony! They would probably do the same for PS3, and that would sate the appetite of those hackers. No bad press, no excessive hacks, possibly some extra cash for Sony.

  4. Nice idea... except by DaHat · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think we all remember how well their last attempt to bring Linux to their console went. Half-arsed and a complete joke.

  5. grammar error...sounds good by amazon10x · · Score: 1
    "Other then game studios tied to official developer licenses, we'd like to see various individuals participate in content creation for the PS3."
    That should be "other than".

    I think this would be a good move for Sony. I would definitely reconsider purchasing the console if I could run linux on it and I think many other people would reconsider too. $599 isn't too bad for a console+linux PC.

    1. Re:grammar error...sounds good by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      But it could only run Cell software. You can't just recompile an application and have it work nicely on the Cell. You have to rewrite the program to make it nicely take advantage of the cells. Even if Sony sold a PS3 running Linux, what would you run on it?

    2. Re:grammar error...sounds good by swanriversean · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I would definitely reconsider purchasing the console if I could run linux on it and I think many other people would reconsider too. $599 isn't too bad for a console+linux PC."

      - right on, I haven't had a console since my SNES. I've already decided to buy a Wii (they had me when they announced the virtual console and the rest is just bonus), but if I can use the PS3 as a desktop computer as well ... that might be a great buy too ... imagine, 2 consoles in my house.

      Of course the PS3 would just be for running Linux ... I can't imagine that would make Sony too happy ... hey even better! Although that is probably the reason why the PS3 won't turn out to be a very good linux platform.

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seus
    3. Re:grammar error...sounds good by d!rtyboy · · Score: 1

      "That should be "other than". I think this would be a good move for Sony. I would definitely reconsider purchasing the console if I could run linux on it and I think many other people would reconsider too. $599 isn't too bad for a console+linux PC." That should be, "console and Linux PC." Also, you did not capitalise "Linux" both times you said it. You used incorrect grammar in your first line. It should have read: That should be, "other than." Notice the placement of the comma and the period. Nothing drives me more insane than sticklers who correct others grammar then make three times the amount of errors in their post. Anyway, I don't care if you can use Linux on a PS3, the PS3 is just going to be a overpriced PS2 with nothing to offer but better graphics. I think I'll pass.

      --
      ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
    4. Re:grammar error...sounds good by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      It should have read: That should be, "other than." Notice the placement of the comma and the period.
      The use of period-inside-quotes rather than the more rational system where the quotes surround the quoted material and the period, which ends the sentence which includes the quotation not a sentence inside the quotation, is placed after the closing quotes is a particular stylistic feature of common U.S. style, not a general feature of English as used globally. The "British" or "logical" style is the dominant style throughout the English-speakign world outside of American formal writing, and is prescribed by some publication's house styles even in the US.
    5. Re:grammar error...sounds good by d!rtyboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but on the internet we use the American English rules, so your point is mute. Even so, I know plenty of Brits and they all use the quotes outside the period, further muting your point. In the end, I really could care less. My point was about anally retentive people who correct peoples spelling when their post is riddled with incorrect grammar. And his post had more grammar errors than just the quotes inside the period, muting your point completely.

      --
      ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
    6. Re:grammar error...sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "three times the amount of errors"

      Errors can be counted, so it should read:

      "three times the number of errors"

    7. Re:grammar error...sounds good by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Media programs regularly spend >90% of their time in a small fraction (<10%) of the code. It would not require a complete rewrite, but instead a redesign of the most computationally demanding parts of the code. Of course it wouldn't be an easy recompile, but its certainly a lot more managable than it might at first seem.

      I have old games I wouldn't mind porting if the console has decent GL support. Typical of one-developer games, they aren't exactly demanding of the system, so I wouldn't even need to use any SPEs.

    8. Re:grammar error...sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but on the internet we use the American English rules

      Yes you do, and we laugh at you. It's always fun to see USians trying desperately to write in they're/there/their own language.

    9. Re:grammar error...sounds good by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Correct me if I'm wrong. . . but all it would need is a kernel driver for the Cell.

      And you don't have to rewrite any programs to take advantage of the cells. Linux handles both multi-CPU systems and hyperthreaded CPUs quite well. I don't see why the Cell should be much different - the only difference between the Cell and most modern CPUs are that the Cell's VPUs are faster and more general-purpose.

  6. Target Audience? by goMac2500 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So Sony is going to go after the free software audience with a $600 console? Someone needs to recheck their math...

    1. Re:Target Audience? by imroy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Oh yeah, because all the other hardware we run Free software on costs nothing. Idiot.

    2. Re:Target Audience? by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      Why would you pay $600 for a sub par Linux box? It's a Cell. It sucks at running software not specifically written for the Cell. A cheap Pentium could probably run circles around it running Linux software. Why would anyone pay a premium for a box that's going to run slow?

    3. Re:Target Audience? by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Free as in freedom, not beer.

      Idiot.

      --
      I got nothin'
    4. Re:Target Audience? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why would you pay $600 for a sub par Linux box?

      Because it lets you put "PS3 development experience" on your resume.

    5. Re:Target Audience? by imroy · · Score: 0

      A Pentium? Are you serious? The PPE in the Cell is essentially IBM's "G5" PowerPC 970 core, complete with Altivec/VMX. That's no slouch. It'll run "software not specifically written for the Cell" just fine. The SPE's are the really interesting parts though.

      And you might want to get the PS/3 as a cheap Cell development platform, it depends on what Sony or IBM do with the Cell. If the only other options are big blade servers from IBM, then $600 for a development machine running Linux would be quite acceptable. Especially if they don't make the same mistakes they made with the PS/2 Linux kit i.e locking it down to the point of near uselessness. I'd still prefer it if someone made a Cell ATX mobo, or something. But I guess the advantage with the PS/3 will be the lower prices due to mass production. Just look at the prices for a non-Apple PowerPC mobo, or any other processor.

    6. Re:Target Audience? by bnenning · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The PPE in the Cell is essentially IBM's "G5" PowerPC 970 core, complete with Altivec/VMX.

      Not really. The PPE is much simpler; for example it's an in-order processor, as opposed to the 970's deep OOOE. It does have SMT, but can only dispatch 2 instructions at once. From discussions among people who know much more than me, the suggested rule of thumb was that a PPE at N GHz is roughly equivalent to 2 G4s each at N/2 Hz.

      The SPE's are the really interesting parts though.

      Right. I think how easy it is to use the SPEs will largely determine how successful Cell is. I wouldn't be suprised if Apple offers Cell coprocessor cards for high-end Macs; it seems like a good fit for offloading image and video tasks.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    7. Re:Target Audience? by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Well it's a gaming console. If you were to buy a gaming pc, it'd cost about that much too..

      Hardware isn't free.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    8. Re:Target Audience? by killtherat · · Score: 1

      I would suggest you look at the Cell BE SDK from IBM. Cell isn't completely impossible to code for. From what I understand, you just write a small app, you get your arguments from main(), and there are a few functions to interface back with the main program. There are a few caviots about instructions, but for the most part it's just like writing in C.

      I'm into Bioinformatics, and I would love to see if I could get each of the individual SPE doing dynamic programming on short sequences. A database search could be sped up 8 fold (or 7 fold on the PS3).

    9. Re:Target Audience? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Hardware isn't free.

      But it wants to be.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  7. Two different stances for two different platforms? by KeiichiMorisato · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So, on the PSP, they are currently actively blocking any attempts of "homebrew" software. But for the PS3, they are going to allow it?

    I don't see how there can be such a big difference in the stance of homebrew applications for their 2 main flagship products. Unless they are going to stop cracking down on these applications for the PSP, or else, this is just some lame attempt to recover from the bashing they are receiving at E3, since they've been bashed about a lot of things, including the crack downs on homebrew apps.

  8. Another Rip At Nintendo by BondGamer · · Score: 0

    There was absolutely nothing that Sony even hinted that there might be "homebrew" application development on the PS3. Then Nintendo mentions it a little during their conference. Now Sony is once again trying to take ideas from Nintendo and incorperate them into their plan.

    But it doesn't matter. It will turn out like their controller, stripped down features and poor implementation.

    1. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Nintendo and would defend them to the grave... But you're wrong.

      Sometime around E3 2005, Song said they'd be doing something with Linux on the PS3.

    2. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by freshman_a · · Score: 1


      Now Sony is once again trying to take ideas from Nintendo and incorperate them into their plan.

      You do realize that there was a Linux kit for the PS2, released in 2002, that was supposed to be aimed at the homebrew crowd, right? (Yes, I realize it was a flop.) Seems to me that Nintendo is copying an idea that Sony first tried. (For the record, I'm a huge Nintendo fan who is very anxious for the Wii.)

      IMHO, the only system that ever really had any sort of decent homebrew scene is the Dreamcast, but that wasn't exactly aided by Sega. http://www.dchomebrew.org/

    3. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I agree -- why isn't Nintendo getting a load of press for what they say here?
      Virtual Console: Wii will have downloadable access to 20 years of fan-favorite titles originally released for Nintendo 64, the Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES) and even the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). The Virtual Console also will feature a "best of" selection from Sega Genesis titles and games from the TurboGrafx console (a system jointly developed by NEC and Hudson). It also will be home to new games conceived by indie developers whose creativity is larger than their budgets.
      I would like to learn more about this. Even if it means buying a $2000 Dev Kit -- that doesn't seem that harsh for a serious indie developer.
    4. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by edwdig · · Score: 1

      The GBA had a pretty good homebrew scene. A few homebrew titles even got picked up by commercial publishers.

    5. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by XBoyAdv · · Score: 1

      "Official" homebrew development is nothing new in Sony. Sony also had a simliar homebrew concept with Net Yaroze with the first Playstation.

    6. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by BondGamer · · Score: 1

      You do realize that there was a Linux kit for the PS2, released in 2002, that was supposed to be aimed at the homebrew crowd, right? (Yes, I realize it was a flop.) Seems to me that Nintendo is copying an idea that Sony first tried.

      Then what explains Sony actively preventing people from trying to create applications for the PSP? After that flop, it appears that Sony had no further interest in anything except official company applications. Now we suddenly hear about their linux stratagy after Nintendo announces their own. We learn of a tilt controller which has supposidly been in development for 10 years after Nintendo announces their own.

      Sony is blatently trying to take every idea possible from Nintendo and incorperate it into their own system. They probably wouldn't be doing this if they didn't create such an expensive piece of hardware. They need every advantage they can get at this point, even if it means taking ideas from the competition.

    7. Re:Another Rip At Nintendo by babbling · · Score: 1

      Who cares whose idea it was first? All I'm interested in is who is supporting homebrew NOW!

  9. If they learned anything from PS2 "linux"... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then this might be the one thing that would convince me to buy a PS3. They'd have to give me access to all the hardware, though. Otherwise, why would I be interested? It seems very unlikely that they'll cough up, so it seems very unlikely that I'll be buying a PS3 before they start hitting garage sales and flea markets.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Why not? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why not get our hopes up a little, when before it didn't really do well and the comment from the article:

    "indicating that it will be possible for individual 'homebrew' coders to create playable content for PS3"

    seems to directly address your concern?

    The most obvious answer is that Sony learned from the past lack up update with PS2 linux and furthermore wants to seed a variety of cool downloadable games, which they can take a cut of. Sounds pretty straightforward to me.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why not? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is why you should be concerned:

      It seems that Sony is happy to let basic application and game construction take place without access to the extremely sophisticated rendering and physics libraries available to licensors - Kawanishi further commented: "When a game studio enacts development on a PS3 by entering a license contract, SDK libraries... will be presented, and various technical support given. In contrast, when using Linux World on the PS3... support will fall to the lowest level required, and you must solve and work on things by yourselves."

      If the article is to be believed, you don't get access to any of the normal libraries. If they don't give us specs, either, then you're not going to be doing much 3D...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Why not? by Metaphorically · · Score: 1

      The most obvious answer is that Sony learned from the past lack up update with PS2 linux and furthermore wants to seed a variety of cool downloadable games, which they can take a cut of. Sounds pretty straightforward to me.

      People learn, animals learn, corporations do not learn. The most obvious answer to me is that Sony got some good press from PS2 Linux (I know I was excited - I had a PS2 Linux mousepad for a couple years). Now they hope to suck in some users that Microsoft just plain won't touch. Seems obvious to me.

      --
      more of the same on Twitter.
    3. Re:Why not? by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      If PS2 Linux is any indication, you'll get access to a good deal of the system's functionality; six of the seven core libraries were opened up (well, given out, anyway), with low-level I/O being the exception, for a number of reasons. (Region-free DVD players and modified game images that boot from Linux are two possibilities that spring to mind.)

      The problem is that Sony doesn't own any complex, reusable 3D or physics engines, at least to the best of my knowledge. That's why platforms like Havok and Renderware are so successful; you either license middleware or roll your own.

      The real problem with the PS2 Linux distro was that you couldn't play anything you wrote on any other machine, not to mention that whatever you'd write had to be sitting on top of the Linux kernel the whole time. I don't know all that much about PS2 programming, but when you have 32 MB of shared memory to work with, I'm guessing that running a robust OS in the background is, um, sub-optimal.

      So yeah, Sony is crazy and paranoid (as are, more importantly, third-party publishers), and yeah, you probably won't be able to write games for anyone other than yourself and other PS3 Linux users.

      On the other hand, it's an opportunity to play with what looks like a really interesting system architecture, so that's always nice.

  11. $500 by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You don't need anything the $100 more version has if you're going to run Linux on it. You can run HD resolutions over component cables and you can hook up USB card readers and storage devices (there was a seperetae article where I think the same person casually mentioned that people who needed CF readers could just hook up normal USB ones).

    I think it could be pretty reasonable as well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. The real difference by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, on the PSP, they are currently actively blocking any attempts of "homebrew" software. But for the PS3, they are going to allow it?

    I don't see how there can be such a big difference in the stance of homebrew applications for their 2 main flagship products.


    The difference is this. On the PSP, if someone creates a game you can play Sony gets no money.

    On the PS3, if you crate a game for others to play you can probably sell it on the Sony online service and Sony gets a cut.

    I'm pretty sure Sony intends this to be a way to have a lot of small games generated to give theonline service buzz, which benefits everyone. It's a shame they can't see reason on the PSP but at least they came to thier senses with the PS3 and it even makes sense in terms of a profit motive.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The real difference by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the PSP, if someone creates a game you can play Sony gets no money. On the PS3, if you crate a game for others to play you can probably sell it on the Sony online service and Sony gets a cut.

      So why doesn't Sony introduce e-commerce in PSP firmware 3.0?

  13. THIS IS WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never used PS2 Linux
    They only blocked access to the DVD file system. everything was intact down to the kernel source.

    Clueless shit gets passed off as +5 Knowledgable here.

    1. Re:THIS IS WRONG by LionMage · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They only blocked access to the DVD file system. everything was intact down to the kernel source.

      Do you think it's possible that somebody other than you might find this restriction to be too onerous for PS2 Linux to be worthwhile?

      Personally, I would never want to write code for a system where one major piece (the optical drive, for crying out loud!) is inaccessible. I'm sure this was Sony's bright idea to prevent piracy -- and we see how well that's working. Game piracy seems to be happening regardless, so this policy really only hurts Linux enthusiasts who wanted to do development work on the PS2.
    2. Re:THIS IS WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are wrong and represent everything that is wrong with geek culture.

    3. Re:THIS IS WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for backing up your opinion with an explanation of why you believe it's wrong.

  14. Linux and complete by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    The wii development kit is still $2000 - hardly what I'd call cheap for just anyone to buy (though hugely cheaper than traditional kits and I think will be a big hit).

    However Linux on a PS3 is I think something that really was thought out before, unlike the shaking controller deal that I agree looks like it was put together at the last moment.

    They did have Linux on the PS2, it just was not very useful. However combined with the online service it makes a lot more sense for people to write thier own cool programs that can then be distributed over the service, making its use much more compelling. The online service had to have been under consideration ever since the XBox.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. Possible reason? by MrJynxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe they're not having to much success with creating apps on the CELL. Hopefully they'll open it up for the genius's of the world to take a stab at coding in the cell environment. For the coders who want to experiment with the CELL, this could be an attractive offering. I"m sure a CELL desktop/server will cost a hell of a lot more than a $599.

    Could be a good thing if they actually give access to all of the hardware. But I doubt it, my PSP is still on firmware 1.5.

    MrJynxx

    1. Re:Possible reason? by Kerr · · Score: 0

      Hopefully they'll open it up for the genius's of the world to take a stab at coding in the cell environment

      I'm no coder, but perhaps you meant something like this ?

      --
      Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal. -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
  16. Good luck putting 4 players around a 17" by tepples · · Score: 1

    It'd be cheaper to buy a MacMini

    Most Mac mini computers are not connected to a television, so good luck getting an audience for a 4-player same-screen game in the tradition of Tetris or Bomberman that's meant to be played on a platform typically connected to a 17" monitor.

    1. Re:Good luck putting 4 players around a 17" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Most Mac mini computers are not connected to a television"
      I wouldn't bet on that. A lot of Mac minis are going to be hooked up to the TV. Not to mention they mythical Apple PVR

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Good luck putting 4 players around a 17" by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Multiple players on a single screen is not the panacea of gaming.

      In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it were the least common "social type" in gaming, losing to single player, turn-based and online multiplayer.

      Just because a machine is not commonly sold with the required $10 cable to connect to a television, does not mean it is useless as a gaming machine.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Good luck putting 4 players around a 17" by tepples · · Score: 1

      In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it were the least common "social type" in gaming, losing to single player, turn-based and online multiplayer.

      Here, one can overly inflate "turn-based" because it encompasses most non-electronic gaming. And as for LAN/online multiplayer, what do I do if there are more kids in the house than PCs?

      Just because a machine is not commonly sold with the required $10 cable to connect to a television

      The trouble is that most people tend to put PCs in a separate room from the TV.

  17. Cell still has a PPE by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can't just recompile an application and have it work nicely on the Cell.

    A single-threaded app such as a typical 2D game will run OK on the Cell processor's PPE alone provided that the compiler is configured for the number of pipes. Sure, the PPE lacks out-of-order, but out-of-order helps primarily when running i586 code on a PII/PIII, or PII/PIII code on a P4, or Pentium code on an Athlon, etc. If you know that all Cell processors have the same pipeline configuration, you can tell the compiler to reorder the instructions in advance.

    1. Re:Cell still has a PPE by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      Right, sorry. By nicely, I meant that they wouldn't run exactly speedy, but somewhere I forgot to explicitly mention that. For the price of the console it's better to buy a real i386.

    2. Re:Cell still has a PPE by tepples · · Score: 1

      For the price of the console it's better to buy a real i386.

      But if you buy a real PC (whether wintel or macintel) and connect it to a TV, then you won't have access to a library of console-style games that are designed to be played by four players, each holding a gamepad, looking at the same screen. Most games that are developed for PCs require one computer per player and one display per player, and that's a lot more expensive than $600.

  18. Yes, please by dianna_wills · · Score: 1

    I think as the gaming console is more and more resembling a normal PC (or more), I don't think putting linux on PS3 would be a problem. I tried running Linux on XBox and it works. Heck, it's working on a *Microsoft* product.

    Have a little (more) faith with Sony.

    But I *do* hope Sony cut down on the price..

    1. Re:Yes, please by Naurgrim · · Score: 1

      Have a little (more) faith with Sony.

      One word: "rootkit".

      I will have faith in Sony only after I see them die in a fire.

      --
      .......You Are,
      ...What You Do,
      When It Counts.
    2. Re:Yes, please by dianna_wills · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the BMG in SonyBMG that made that happen. *shrugs*

    3. Re:Yes, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The xbox is just a cut down regular PC running near enough regular hardware. The Cell CPUs are something different, and the first thing we need to know is what the developer tools are, and will they be freely or cheaply available, and will Sony allow free distribution of home brew titles?

      Did you ever notice how many xbox projects disappeared off the scene due to restrictions with MS and their dev kit? If Sony pull a stunt like this, the PS3+Linux will be dead too.

  19. It appears that it's more Linux++ this time by Morgaine · · Score: 3, Informative
    You seem to have forgotten the following two Linux-related announcements:

    - Kutaragi at the recent 2006 PlayStation Business Briefing

    ... which claims: "Kutaragi said that that the PS3 will require a hard drive, which will have a 60 GB capacity and support Linux OS."

    - Kutaragi at the earlier PS3 Conference Report

    ... which says: "He [Kutaragi] did offer some tantalizing new details about the system, though. PS3 will include a 60GB hard drive (which is upgradeable) with Linux preinstalled."

    It would appear then that things aren't all that bleak. Maybe IBM had an influence this time around, as they would love to see the Cell succeed, and perhaps forced Sony to open up a bit.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  20. But how many Macs? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Even if a large percentage of Mac mini computers are connected to televisions large enough for four players, that's a large percentage of what number? How many Mac mini computers have been sold or will be sold by November 2007? How many PS3 consoles will be sold by the same date?

    1. Re:But how many Macs? by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Considering they're now at the same price point, it will be interesting to see what the sales figures look like in a year.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  21. Go directly to jail, do not pass Go? by tepples · · Score: 1

    So Sony is going to go after the free software audience with a $600 console?

    It's a lot cheaper than emigration to a country that doesn't reserve the right to throw modchip users in jail.

  22. This time IS different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The PS2 wasn't capable enough to be competitive with a Wintel PC for general purpose (spreadsheet, email, web-browser, etc) apps and hardware (printer, hard disks, etc).

    The PS3, however, looks more capable in all ways than the PowerPC Mac-Minis -- which makes it capable enough to be someone's primary PC.

    If they play the Linux card right, this is Sony's chance to take the Workstation market (the Cell chip is indeed awesome - I'm evaluating starting a company building a High-Def H264 video encoder with it) away from Sun and Linux - and put a pretty good dent in the PC / Apple market.

    I'm optimistic they see this and will do it right this time.

    1. Re:This time IS different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's awesome for now. In a few years it'll be outdated, and workstation users will want something more powerful, which Sony won't be providing since they'll be manufacturing PS3s that are exactly the same power as they will be at launch.

      I don't see them as having any interest in producing upgraded systems based on it either. In addition the hardware would be less attractive to buyers as well if they didn't sell the hardware at a loss, which they couldn't do in the workstation market.

  23. Or you could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy a computer that comes with a nice high resolution lcd monitor, two extremely versatile input devices (keyboard and mouse), and is upgradeable with thousands of devices from Dell, eMachines, etc for $599... Trust me, linux will run on that too, and most software won't require a recompile (after the come up with a good compiler for the Cell processor for single thread designed programs) to work.

    1. Re:Or you could... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Just buy a computer that comes with a nice high resolution lcd monitor, two extremely versatile input devices (keyboard and mouse), and is upgradeable with thousands of devices from Dell, eMachines, etc for $599

      How many simultaneous players can this computer support?

      (after the come up with a good compiler for the Cell processor for single thread designed programs)

      Unless OpenGL runs in its own thread.

    2. Re:Or you could... by theelectron · · Score: 1

      OpenGL would have to run in about 4-8 threads to be worthwhile.

  24. $500 for a PS3 plus $100 for Linux? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You don't need anything the $100 more version has if you're going to run Linux on it.

    Unless the Linux environment is available only as part of the $600 bundle, meaning that owners of the $500 system are limited to playing only signed code.

    1. Re:$500 for a PS3 plus $100 for Linux? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Unless the Linux environment is available only as part of the $600 bundle, meaning that owners of the $500 system are limited to playing only signed code.

      So, can you give any reason whatsoever that would be the case? It sounds pretty unlikely and seems like groundless speculation from someone who simply wants to believe the worst of Sony no matter what.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. MOD PARENT UP by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

    Its true. Although I doubt they will give access to the blu ray drive, but that won't really be such a bad thing.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by tepples · · Score: 1

      With no access to any optical drive, how do you load a distro onto the system?

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      The ps2 linux kit locked access to the optical drive after you booted, so you couldn't use it to rip DVD's, although you could play movies off of the network or at least copy them over the network to your harddrive.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by tepples · · Score: 1

      you could play movies off of the network or at least copy them over the network to your harddrive.

      Which requires one to have a PC within 100BASE-TX range of the PS2, making it little better than just running TV-out on an existing PC.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      The kit was so people who wanted to could play around with ps2gl and the emotion engine, not to turn the PC into a media centre. It centred around creating a community of programmers who knew C++ and needed/wanted a cheap way to mess with a MIPS based processor. I'm sure there are a few developers out there that got their start on the ps2 linux kit.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just use a wireless bridge.

  26. Great, but by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    Will it run Perl?

    1. Re:Great, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really need a $600 box with accelerated 3D graphics and sound to run Perl scripts?

    2. Re:Great, but by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      We do if we can turn the SPEs into Synergistic Perl Evaluators.

    3. Re:Great, but by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Do you really need a $600 box with accelerated 3D graphics and sound to run Perl scripts?

      Yes. Adding some funky Perl into the kids Playstations would definitely be fun...

  27. Without going through a vulture capitalist... by tepples · · Score: 1

    So how does an indie developer develop and sell a first title to earn the money to buy a $2000 devkit for the developer's second title?

    1. Re:Without going through a vulture capitalist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't finance it with the first title, you take out a loan or pay out-of-pocket. Count the zeroes there.

      I'm rooting for Sony, but that price for a devkit is nothing.

    2. Re:Without going through a vulture capitalist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price is nothing if you're a professional outfit. But a general hacker with limited interest will not waste $2k on it, plus $600 for the hardware. And there goes 99.9% of the potential developers (unless a warez version gets around). Make the tools free, and you'll have an army of people hacking on the box, and buying the box just because of the potential to have fun.

    3. Re:Without going through a vulture capitalist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are obviously a juvenile.

      Anyone with a real job realizes that $2,000 is less than the average American spends on liquor a year. Most people with jobs spend extraneous money on more expensive things like... a motorcycle for $6,000 to $15,000. Being "an adult" is not as expensive as it looks unless you are a total moron with your money. Assuming you are a professional developer of some sort, the $2,000 for an official dev kit (including special hardware, support, and technical specifications) probably costs less than that piece of exercise equipment you wish you used more.

    4. Re:Without going through a vulture capitalist... by justchris · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain the 'dev kit' includes both development software, and hardware to test it on. If it did not, it would be pretty useless as a dev kit. So it would only be the $2000 fee. I can make that in 2 months if I severly curb my other entertainment expenses.

      --
      just some guy
  28. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it run Windows? Ha I thought so, what a pos.

  29. So what? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Of course you don;t get access to the libraries, that's what the really expensve dev kit fees pay for!

    It doesn't matter as long as you have direct access to the graphics processors. Then people can craft thier own libraries. Yes it's unlikely that we'll see MGS5 - Joe Schmo edition, but we'll see a lot of cool smaller games I think if people are allowed to develop and share them online.

    There are plenty of free engines people could also port if they really need libraries.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So what? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "It doesn't matter as long as you have direct access to the graphics processors. Then people can craft thier own libraries. "

      Spoken like someone that has never written a line of code.

      If having direct access is all that you need then where are the free drivers for nVidia and Ati graphics cards?
      Having access isn't enough. You need drivers!
      If we are lucky Sony will give you a frame-buffer. Good enough for Frozen-bubble but not enough to get me to pay $600+ for.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:So what? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Spoken like someone that has never written a line of code.

      If having direct access is all that you need then where are the free drivers for nVidia and Ati graphics cards?
      Having access isn't enough. You need drivers!


      Actually I have done a fair amount of OpenGL programming.

      I pretty obviosuly did not mean THAT direct. I meant some standard way to acces sthe graphics card, it's kind of hard to image there will not be an OpenGL library or at least device drive for the video card we can access.

      You are coming at this from the wrong angle, Sony themseves has said they want this to be able to build user provided content. So instead of thinking of what ways Sony might possibly lock down the whole box so no-one could actually do what they say, instead think of the kinds of minimum easily portable tools they might include.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:So what? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      I think what he meant was that you can hack it and write drivers for it. . .

      He's right - if you have the time and the willpower you can do it. Hey, that's what people did for the Xbox, didn't they? Hack it and figure out a way to run Linux on it?

    4. Re:So what? by millennial · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You do realize that the PSP has an almost fully-functional unofficial SDK that covers most of the PSP's functions, right? It's possible for a group of diligent hackers to do just about anything, if they want to do it badly enough.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  30. Cue the smoke! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2, Funny

    And let's get some mirrors in here!

    Don't put them there. Put them in front of that sign--the one that says 599.

  31. Probably in the future by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have no idea, but perhaps they are working on it... you'd think they would like to tie the PSP into the online market they are building. I assume that they probably will do something like that when the PS3 ships, until then there's no need (for them).

    Perhaps Linux for the PS3 will eventually see a cross-compiler that supports the PSP.

    You'd think these portable makers would wake up to the huge demand for programmability of these devices and give people an outlet for that...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. games? by Keruo · · Score: 1

    I hope they haven't totally crippled possibility of separating the two GIGe ports intended for intranet.
    One for lan, other for dmz, and this would make a killing router/firewall/vpn-concentrator.
    The CPU should be fast enough to handle hundreds of vpn connections, if the promised performance holds true.

    I know you can get 1gig gaming router from dlink for less than $100, but that thing doesn't:
    * have dmz
    * work as vpn server
    * run linux

    If sony would make the platform open enough, this thing would be WRT54G on steroids.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already killed the second ethernet port.

    2. Re:games? by karstux · · Score: 1

      You're thinking about turning a $500 games console (which will likely draw >100W constant) into a router? That's crazy.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
  33. how about Linux on all Vaios? by tddoog · · Score: 1
    If they really want to kick Microsoft in the nuts and gain some love back from those who hate rootkits, they would ship Vaio's with Linux. With an open source solution at least someone could tell if they were spying on you.

    Plus it could make them some money in the long run.

    1. Re:how about Linux on all Vaios? by ewhac · · Score: 1
      If they really want to kick Microsoft in the nuts and gain some love back from those who hate rootkits, they would ship Vaio's with Linux.

      Actually, all they'd have to do is publish the source code to a working Sony Peripheral Interface driver, so the weird buttons and jog shuttles on their laptops will work properly.

      And some power management enhancements wouldn't hurt, either.

      Schwab

  34. Again, why not? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Not having access to specs never stopped homebrew before. Just check what is out there. Oh sure it takes time but that is because usually you got to fight the system first. This time the system is "open".

    No it may not be documented but if "amateurs" can emulate consoles from scratch and put homebrew software on hardware that tries to fight them then I don't think this will be too much of a problem.

    What I wonder is not the access to libraries but to the hardware. Will the Cell really be fully available?

    I think Sony is experimenting. They know MS owns the PC and they can do little about it but perhaps just maybe sometime in the future all of a sudden another OS they do not have to develop themselves might just make inroads.

    If it fails, then they lost nothing. If it succeeds. Well who knows what might happen.

    If PS3 sells like the PS2 AND it does become a viable linux computer then that would give MS the serious jitters. You can't tell me Sony wouldn't like that.

    Remember MS siding with Nintendo against Sony? Might be because they too think Sony has designs other then on having the best selling console.

    We will just have to see what really happens but for now lets keep an open mind. Whatever sony is trying it is way more then the other console companies have done to allow amateurs to develop for their machines.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  35. Right by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You are going to run a Sony piece of hardware as a linux machine. You think that might not make Sony very happy. Now think a little bit further. Who might not like it as well? Does the word Wintel mean anything to you?

    Cause you would be running a IBM/Linux desktop NOT the everpresent Wintel setup. I think Sony would like it because MicroSoft would totally not like it.

    It is offcourse unlikely that this will have any effect but at least something is being tried.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  36. GP2X and Mac mini by tepples · · Score: 1

    All I'm interested in is who is supporting homebrew NOW!

    For handhelds, that would be GamePark Holdings. Unfortunately, if you want to develop and sell games for GP2X, you run into the problem that the GP2X doesn't have enough user base to support the economies of scale of a typical game. PDAs don't count anymore because Microsoft and other PDA OS vendors have gone down the lockout chip route, with network operators having the ability to shut off execution of unsigned apps on their subsidized smartphones, and with little or no "open market" for unsubsidized smartphones or standalone PDAs in North America.

    For consoles, that would be Apple. Apple learned from the failed Pippin and made a console that can run programs that run on its other Macintosh computers. This console has about the same footprint as a GameCube, costs roughly 500 to 600 USD, and is called the Mac mini.

  37. Standalone games, or just mods? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sony themseves has said they want this to be able to build user provided content.

    That's "user provided content", not "user provided programs". People writing about the entertainment industry tend to use the term "content" to refer to any work other than a computer program. Such a statement could just refer to mods (maps, models, and missions) for existing licensed games, right?

  38. Content means just that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Since content includes games, and they are trying to build an online store with microgames simialr to XBOx Live, we can be pretty sure of what the intent is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  39. NO YUO by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    The kernel source may have open; OP is referring to the fact that the whole PS2 Linux setup basically ran on an emulation layer between the OS and the 'bare metal'. Using closed drivers.

    He is absolutely right to say that it was crippled and didn't allow access to the hardware.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  40. ATA standard hard drives by joelpt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Phil Harrison: .. If you're a complete music fan and video fan, and you want to have huge amounts of digital content, then you can upgrade to whatever size of drive you like. You can put any in that you like - it is a computer, after all.

    gamesindustry.biz: So that hard drive is a standard PC drive?

    Phil Harrison: ATA, bog standard, yeah.

    gamesindustry.biz: You're not going to be selling Sony drive upgrades?

    Phil Harrison: We've got no plan to. We may offer something, but we have no plan to at the moment.

    http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid= 16969

  41. Modern day equivalent of Amiga or Atari ST by marvelite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I started in computing with a ZX81 connected to a TV and moved on to a Sinclair Spectrum. Later bought an Atari ST set but had access to a nephew's Commodore Amiga. This was at a time when PC had crappy graphic and cost an arm and a leg. Now on to my third PC in 10 years which is good enough for everything but play the games at their best. (A good graphic cost more than a PS3). A PS3 with Linux installed and off the shelf USB keyboard and mouse will be a viable alternative to a Windows PC.

  42. (OT) Quoting in hackish by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes, but on the internet we use the American English rules

    Perhaps you may be correct on sites in the .us domain, but on www.bbc.co.uk they use the Queen's English, and they like it. Tendencies on Slashdot also tend toward "hackish" (jargon) constructions. Eric Raymond offers the example of the difference between "Type 'dd.'" and "Type 'dd.'" in a tutorial about the vi text editor.

    so your point is mute.

    You mean "moot".

    1. Re:(OT) Quoting in hackish by d!rtyboy · · Score: 1

      "Eric Raymond offers the example of the difference between "Type 'dd.'" and "Type 'dd.'" in a tutorial about the vi text editor."

      Actually, it would be far more precise to use a code tag or similar device in that instance, or even ignore punctuation altogether. When clarifying something in code, that becomes more important than trivial issues such as correct grammar.

      We use American English on the internet because we invented it. And since we invented it, we get to say what kind of English we use.

      And I did mean, "mute." As in, silenced, muffled, etc.

      --
      ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
    2. Re:(OT) Quoting in hackish by tepples · · Score: 1

      it would be far more precise to use a code tag or similar device in that instance

      E-mail sent as text/plain doesn't have a code or kbd element. Neither does the subset of HTML accepted by Slashdot. SlashML does have tt, but that's 1. presentational (and deprecated) and 2. not distinguished easily from normal text with many font settings.

      or even ignore punctuation altogether.

      Grammar national socialists on Slashdot tend to hate punctuation-free posts even more than posts that use hackish or British quoting.

      When clarifying something in code, that becomes more important than trivial issues such as correct grammar.

      So in other words your other comment is mute or moot or both because Slashdot users do a lot of "clarifying something in code". (Or "clarifying something in code.")

      We use American English on the internet because we invented it.

      Mr. Vice President, what gives the inventors of the Internet the right to dictate the language used in e-mail, especially after 20 years? For instance, an e-mail message may be sent with Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, which includes thousands of characters not used in American English.

      ObTopic: Will the e-mail client in the PS3's Linux distribution include a grammar checker?

    3. Re:(OT) Quoting in hackish by lazyl · · Score: 1

      And I did mean, "mute." As in, silenced, muffled, etc.

      ROTFL! In other words: "Oh shit! How can I cover my ass here?"

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    4. Re:(OT) Quoting in hackish by d!rtyboy · · Score: 1
      "ROTFL! In other words: 'Oh shit! How can I cover my ass here?'"

      I hate the term "moot," I think it sounds stupid and I have never used it. Mute and moot mean two different things. I did not mean his point was "Subject to debate; arguable." It wasn't even in the same context. Please go back under the bridge where you belong. Thank you.

      "Grammar national socialists on Slashdot tend to hate punctuation-free posts even more than posts that use hackish or British quoting."

      Well, even my British friends say putting the period outside the quotations is wrong. So, I don't see how this debate even started. In fact, other than wikipedia, I could not find another source that says to put the period outside the quote. Since wikipedia is done by anyone who feels like it, I tend to trust my friends over some silly website. If I did, I would believe the holocaust never happened or mickey overdosed on pop rocks and coca cola or the middle finger originated from the British flipping the bird to the French saying, "we can still pluck yew," or whatever.

      "So in other words your other comment [slashdot.org] is mute or moot or both because Slashdot users do a lot of 'clarifying something in code.'"

      Reread my post, this time more carefully, as that was my point of my post, is that we need to get rid of the grammar nazis. I guess people like to have their posts spell checked with anal meticulousness.

      --
      ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
    5. Re:(OT) Quoting in hackish by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 1

      Apologies for this being my first post etc, but: "Well, even my British friends say putting the period outside the quotations is wrong. So, I don't see how this debate even started. In fact, other than wikipedia, I could not find another source that says to put the period outside the quote. Since wikipedia is done by anyone who feels like it, I tend to trust my friends over some silly website." A simple google spewed out the following useful discussions upon this topic: http://www.betterwritingskills.com/articles/quotat ion-marks.txt http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-pun1.htm http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/doc/punctuation/node30. html (this is from a British the website of a British university, and contains a useful example at the end of the page with a well known Shakespeare quote). Detailed discussions on this point are not hard to discover. Also, I should point out that a lot of people enjoy grammar, and accordingly are not acting in a "Nazi" role when the point out minor errors to others. Personally, I did not think the original post in discussion was particularly offensive, but found your subsequent attack uneedlessly vitriolic to the extent that I registered on slashdot and posted my response. "Other then game studios tied to official developer licenses, we'd like to see various individuals participate in content creation for the PS3." That should be "other than". The attitude that everyone on the net should use American English as opposed British English (where both are equally understandable to the speakers/readers of either) is pretty arrogant in my opinion.

  43. I want to become a professional developer by tepples · · Score: 1

    Assuming you are a professional developer of some sort

    I want to move out of my parents' basement and become a professional game developer. However, I lack the money to move out of Fort Wayne, Indiana, where the video game development industry is pretty much nonexistent.

    the $2,000 for an official dev kit (including special hardware, support, and technical specifications) probably costs less than that piece of exercise equipment you wish you used more.

    For cardio, I buy a $50 pair of running shoes a year. For strength training, I went to a gym for 2 years at $500 per year to get to the point where I could just go to a public park and use my body as the resistance for dips and chin-ups and the like.

  44. Who then by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    People learn, animals learn, corporations do not learn.

    What do you think composes corperations? Hint: It's not animals, but they learn.

    The most obvious answer to me is that Sony got some good press from PS2 Linux (I know I was excited - I had a PS2 Linux mousepad for a couple years). Now they hope to suck in some users that Microsoft just plain won't touch. Seems obvious to me.

    That's far fetched at best, given that they got really little press at all from the last round of PS2 stuff. You are ignoring something that can make them money - they aren't.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowulf cluster of LimitedLinux(TM) PS3s.

  46. I used to play 3D games by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    on a P200 with no hardware accel. Quake, Duke 3d, Doom, etc. I'm sure the raw performance of the ps3 will be more than enough for hobbiests to code the kind of basic 3D they're able to. If you're skilled/professional enough to code ps3 hardware (no mean feat), then buy the sdk.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I used to play 3D games by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      If all I can expect from this are shoddy Quake ripoffs, I'd rather stick to PC for hobbyist development, thank you very much.

    2. Re:I used to play 3D games by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Say goodbye to (*insert modern FPS here*), then, if that's REALLY what you meant.

      Sure, they may have better graphics, physics, and storylines, but they're still the same gameplay and everything.

      And hardware acceleration has nothing to do with how pretty a game looks. I've seen OpenGL and DirectX games that look like HELL, and I've seen games that aren't hardware-accelerated that look pretty good. Pretty graphics require an artist, not a graphics card.

  47. Everyone is missing the point. by iamghetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Main point:

    Nintendo Wii has its virtual console where classic Nintendo, Sega, and Turbographix 16 games can be played. Xbox 360 has Xbox Live Arcade where users can download classic games and play them on their console. And what does PS3 have? Homebrew. With homebrew will come access to everything availabe on Nintendo's Virtual Console and the 360's Live Arcade and much more. Documentation is freely available on how to code for the Cell, and it bet it would take all of 6 months to have MAME, Snes9x, Reailty64, FCE Ultra (NES), Gens and everything else up and running on it. Underhanded? Sure is. But you know it will happen. And I for one will be thrilled about it.

    Other points:

    - I think Sony also realizes that by allowing homebrews on Linux, they'll due themselves a favor by stifling people trying to hack the system. Most system hacks come from hackers who want to run homebrew apps on a system (case and point, the 360 has been hacked, but since the hack can only be used to pirate games, they've not released the source code). So by giving people the ability to run homebrews outright, they'll immediately cut down on hacking and (i think) in dear themselves to a lot of users.

    - PS2 linux failed because (as mentioned in these comments) was not a very serious nor technically mature effort by Sony. It was more of a proof of concept than anything. Sony barely talked about, and they certainly never bragged about it. They released it in 2002 and discontinued it 2003. With only 32MB of RAM (not to mention the processing power) there was limited use for the system as much more of a gimmick. Not many of you would've actively been running a poorly optimized version of linux on a slow pc with only 32MB of memory, so I mean, you can't blame Sony for not sticking with it long term as supporting it. The product had limited use. Like a car that could only drive 30 miles at a time.

    - Fast forward to 2006, and Sony has publicly stated the PS3's intent to run Linux (and potentialy Mac OS X- . Sony & Apple have talked about teaming up, and with OS X on PS3 they could both stick it nemesis Microsoft). The PS3 has a total of 512MB of RAM, more than enough to run Linux properly, and in additional to that it has a processor that easily twice as fast (probably more) than the fastest PC desktop processor available. IBM already has a Linux kernel compiled and running on the Cell, so this notion of PS3+LINUX is -today- far more reality than fiction. With its built-in hdd (once, maybe still, rumored to ship -with- linux preinstalled) the PS3 could be a fully functional, very useful computer.

    - When you look at it (or at least when I do) for $500-$600 you would have seriously powerful PC, Console, and Blu-Ray disc player. I realize that's more than some people want, but it's everything I'd like to see in the system.

    1. Re:Everyone is missing the point. by Chandler55 · · Score: 0

      my dream is that Google or the linux community contributed to a kickass operating system for the PS3 so that it could do e-mail/web surfing/word processing etc and tried to make it the most userfriendly of operating systems. but alas I dream

      --
      FreeSimpleGames - some fun games I made
  48. PS3: What Sony should do by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PS3 is a very expensive console. $599 or $699. That's a lot of money for a console. Now, what Sony should do is to provide a lot of functionlaity for that money. What could they do?

    a) Make it a good DVD/Blu-Ray player. Yes, PS2 and Xbox can play back DVD's. But they are not very good at it. Make the PS3 actually a good DVD-player, and consumers have no reason to buy a separate DVD-player.

    b) Make it a computer. People still need computers. And while Cell might not be ideal for general-purpose computing, it should still be fast enough. So put Linux in the PS3, make it easy for the consumer to use it. They could use it for email, surfing, word-processing and the like. So the consumer has no need to buy a separate computer that costs several hundred dollars. And, this way Sony can attack Microsoft on it's home-turf. If the PS3-Computer" fails, no big deal. If it succeeds, it hurts MS where it counts (Widnows and Office. Less money to put to their console-business).

    If sony does thosetwo things, they could say (truthfully) that Why buy a console that costs 499 dollars, and then buy a computer that costs 699 dollars and DVD-player that costs 109 sollars, when you could jsut buy a PS3 for 699 dollars and be done with it?

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:PS3: What Sony should do by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      If sony does thosetwo things, they could say (truthfully) that Why buy a console that costs 499 dollars, and then buy a computer that costs 699 dollars and DVD-player that costs 109 sollars, when you could jsut buy a PS3 for 699 dollars and be done with it?

      That strategy certainly worked wonderfully for both the Coleco Adam AND the Mattel Aquarius.

      Videogame crash 2, here we come!

      --saint

  49. PS3 is a vessel for Blu-Ray by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    It's starting to look like the PS3's primary goal is to ship Blu-Ray players. They're using the gaming console simply as a means to that end.
    Licensing the Next Big Media Format(tm) could provide at least as much revenue as the entire PS3 gaming market would. Trying to establish Blu-Ray as the standard would be a goal worthy enough for Sony to break some former believes in order to get the Blu-Ray format in homes.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?