It has already happened. May 2010. Coalition Government under David Cameron formed after the popular vote states "None Of The Above". 2014: Leaked documents reveal Cameron's plan to create a One-Party State following the 2015 Election.
Stapleguns are designed to kill? Nail guns are designed to kill? Electron guns are designed to kill? Jackhammers are designed to kill?
Incidentally, there are approximately 200 million rabbits in England (not counting Scotland or Wales), 300 million pigeons and 12 billion rats, all of which are controlled by cunts like ME armed with... AIR RIFLES. I keep bread below £5 a loaf. YOU'RE WELCOME.
the legal definition of genocide is manifold, but it does encompass the killing of (any number of) members of one group based on race or ethnicity, by a State party. It also encompasses the forced removal of (any number of) children from one group to another group based on not only race or ethnicity, but also religion and political stance. The latter is known as cultural genocide.
Go dark NOW. All communications must be wetware-to-wetware and randomised. Electronic communicaitons will not be acknowledged nor will they be responded to. All previous arrangements are now void, all meetings vacated.
I posted a story a while ago about a slew of John Doe copyright cases that were dismissed out of hand for the simple reason that the COPYRIGHT HOLDER, NOT A THIRD PARTY, is the sole entity with the right to file such claims, AND that there is no way to prove an IP as a form of personal identity.
That post was dropped in favour of a slush piece about Kim Kardashian's ever increasing glutes.
to get a parallel proceeding in another jurisdiction you would have to lie to the court. If the case is already the subject of a criminal proceeding, any civil proceedings *must*, no matter where they are, be suspended pending the outcome of the criminal proceeding. In the case of two civil or two criminal trials for the same thing in two different jurisdictions, there are a few options: a Lis Alibi Pendens is issued by the court of first instance, which means no other proceedings may take place, period; or, one jurisdiction may cede to another in which case the proceeding may or may not move venues, or the two jurisdictions agree to move the proceedings to a higher jurisdiction (eg District to County) where both may prosecute the same case on the same evidence at the same time in the same chamber.
Normally, though, you can only file a claim in the jurisdiction in which the alleged offence took place, at which point the jurisdiction is settled and the venue is determined right then and there.
Ergo, misprepresenting the Lawful position in order to obtain a settlement equal to the actual cap under threat of a claim for some thirty times the cap which would be dismissed anyway, but not before it bankrupted the respondent, would be found as fraud.
actually, it is. Simply because, in Canadian law (an in others), actual loss need not have occurred. Only the act of deception needs to be proved; a simple reference to the relevant Statute will do that in very short order.
sure they have the right to settle. They DO NOT have the right to have a THIRD PARTY make deceptive threats on their behalf, though, which ab initio invalidates their entire claim.
their own documents damn them. The statements on the notices are collectively and individually, statements of intent. That they are deceptive places those statements in the realm of fraudulent. That they deceive in terms of the legal position of the Person who issued them, doubly so in that they are instruments of Fraud, and that they make threats of litigation using false information makes them Statutory instruments of Fraud.
The problem you have is that breaking the Law to enforce the Law is a right afforded only Law Enforcement Officers, and then under extremely narrow circumstances. For example, shooting a suspect in the back (fleeing a scene waving a gun around?) can be justified, where if he were on the floor with his hands behind his head and his thumbs interlocked and his legs crossed over his ass, not so much.
Slashdot Mirror
ooh, ouch... worst I ever had was a dislocated kneecap, 15mg morphine and I was the highest 13 year old on the planet.
you've really thought this through, haven't you?
declaring war on a group isn't protected free speech either.
Unless you're a head of State.
It has already happened.
May 2010. Coalition Government under David Cameron formed after the popular vote states "None Of The Above".
2014: Leaked documents reveal Cameron's plan to create a One-Party State following the 2015 Election.
Welcome to the UK, home of the Fourth Reich.
You sure about that?
Not an exhaustive list and only up to 2011:
China 1945-46
Korea 1950-53
China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-60
Guatemala 1960
Belgian Congo 1964
Guatemala 1964
Dominican Republic 1965-66
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Lebanon 1982-84
Grenada 1983-84
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1981-92
Nicaragua 1981-90
Iran 1987-88
Libya 1989
Panama 1989-90
Iraq 1991
Kuwait 1991
Somalia 1992-94
Bosnia 1995
Iran 1998
Sudan 1998
Afghanistan 1998
Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999
Yemen 2000
Afghanistan 2001-ongoing
Iraq 2002-ongoing
Libya 2011
As at 2011, the total number of noncombatant civilian casualties to US military activity since September 1945 stood at 50 million.
uh, no they're not, they're polarised radicals. Anyone claiming this kind of shit in the name of ANY God is a fucking liar.
...that the thing Anonymous is claiming to be defending in its actions is the very thing it is attacking!
Fuck me.
extorting money by deception is malicious intent.
uh... I have a drawer cabinet full of handguns, all legally held.
Guns are designed to kill
Oh, really, Sparky?
Stapleguns are designed to kill?
Nail guns are designed to kill?
Electron guns are designed to kill?
Jackhammers are designed to kill?
Incidentally, there are approximately 200 million rabbits in England (not counting Scotland or Wales), 300 million pigeons and 12 billion rats, all of which are controlled by cunts like ME armed with... AIR RIFLES. I keep bread below £5 a loaf. YOU'RE WELCOME.
Think about what you're saying, you fucking tool.
tell that to the 53 million foreign non-combatants who have died at the hands of the United States military since 1945.
those two were actually on the MI6 watch list and on the UKBA Denial list. They would have been refused entry into the UK. Apparently.
His name is David Cameron.
fuck me, if one in a hundred cars was destined to explode I think they'd be banned as weapons of mass destruction.
the legal definition of genocide is manifold, but it does encompass the killing of (any number of) members of one group based on race or ethnicity, by a State party.
It also encompasses the forced removal of (any number of) children from one group to another group based on not only race or ethnicity, but also religion and political stance. The latter is known as cultural genocide.
Disclosure: IAAL.
in which case one of the other options is used. That's why there are several.
Go dark NOW. All communications must be wetware-to-wetware and randomised. Electronic communicaitons will not be acknowledged nor will they be responded to. All previous arrangements are now void, all meetings vacated.
Surveil *that*, motherfuckers.
I posted a story a while ago about a slew of John Doe copyright cases that were dismissed out of hand for the simple reason that the COPYRIGHT HOLDER, NOT A THIRD PARTY, is the sole entity with the right to file such claims, AND that there is no way to prove an IP as a form of personal identity.
That post was dropped in favour of a slush piece about Kim Kardashian's ever increasing glutes.
to get a parallel proceeding in another jurisdiction you would have to lie to the court. If the case is already the subject of a criminal proceeding, any civil proceedings *must*, no matter where they are, be suspended pending the outcome of the criminal proceeding. In the case of two civil or two criminal trials for the same thing in two different jurisdictions, there are a few options: a Lis Alibi Pendens is issued by the court of first instance, which means no other proceedings may take place, period; or, one jurisdiction may cede to another in which case the proceeding may or may not move venues, or the two jurisdictions agree to move the proceedings to a higher jurisdiction (eg District to County) where both may prosecute the same case on the same evidence at the same time in the same chamber.
Normally, though, you can only file a claim in the jurisdiction in which the alleged offence took place, at which point the jurisdiction is settled and the venue is determined right then and there.
fraud is extremely easy to prove if you have the instruments of fraud as sent by them, in your hand to show to the court as exhibit A.
Ergo, misprepresenting the Lawful position in order to obtain a settlement equal to the actual cap under threat of a claim for some thirty times the cap which would be dismissed anyway, but not before it bankrupted the respondent, would be found as fraud.
actually, it is. Simply because, in Canadian law (an in others), actual loss need not have occurred. Only the act of deception needs to be proved; a simple reference to the relevant Statute will do that in very short order.
sure they have the right to settle. They DO NOT have the right to have a THIRD PARTY make deceptive threats on their behalf, though, which ab initio invalidates their entire claim.
their own documents damn them. The statements on the notices are collectively and individually, statements of intent. That they are deceptive places those statements in the realm of fraudulent. That they deceive in terms of the legal position of the Person who issued them, doubly so in that they are instruments of Fraud, and that they make threats of litigation using false information makes them Statutory instruments of Fraud.
Thank you, come again.
The problem you have is that breaking the Law to enforce the Law is a right afforded only Law Enforcement Officers, and then under extremely narrow circumstances. For example, shooting a suspect in the back (fleeing a scene waving a gun around?) can be justified, where if he were on the floor with his hands behind his head and his thumbs interlocked and his legs crossed over his ass, not so much.