She's a fascist. And what does say about her voters. Bunch of fucking sheep they are!
Well... I loath to throw the 'F' word around excessively. But given her voting record it honestly is a good fit. Very hawkish, very pro federal power, very anti liberty.
I... also hate to go so far as to call her supports sheep. But I just don't have a nicer way to put it. Perhaps it's the divisiveness of politics here in the US. A lot of people get it in their mind that if it's 'Right' it ain't right! And no one in her own party wants to challenge her for the position.
I like your wording better than the headline. She did indeed have that right all the time and the court forced the rest of the government to recognize that fact.
Well I made that quip because Feinstein purposed an amendment a while back that would strip certain journalistic protections under the first amendment UNLESS you worked for an established news organization. Which would give the federal government an avenue to attack anyone they didn't like the message of.
Full disclosure: I'm one of those 'climate skeptics' that journals are trying to silence. Not that I'm trying to write a paper about it. But the 'debate' about climate change really has started to degenerate into the level of fanaticism in decent years. And this news story is a perfect example of that.
The whole idea of writing a previewed scientific paper is to get your research out there and present it to so that the scientific community as a whole can pick it apart. Call it Darwinian research, if nothing else. And this is done via these journals. But if journals beginning throwing out papers that don't agree with their ideology the entire system starts to go all to shit!
It should not be the job of these editors to weed out dissenting options. What they need to be doing is letting people with 'crazy ideas' embarrasses themselves enough that they go away. If their idea is 'that crazy'.
... recognized that his administration has slipped up in allowing the NSA to have 100% free feign with civilian surveillance. Our bad.
To reward the citizens continued support of out cause we will be increasing the official ObamaChocolate programs weekly individual chocolate allowance from 30 grams to 25 grams.
.. but I've read a few news stories about several attempts to begin starting up the 'back end' that have all failed catastrophically. Like loosing the records of entire states catastrophically.
If nothing else we're all going to find out when they start trying to turn it all on.
Well... yes. But then again you can't really go out and buy those legally. I don't know what the laws on NFA weapons are in D.C. but I'm pretty sure they start with 'Don't even THINK about it.'
To be honest I'd probably keep an real IMI Uzi for defense. If I could get one.
But yes. If you actually live in the D.C. you're kind of hooped. Unless someone actually manages to open a gun store that serves the general public. And I don't see think we'll see that happen any time soon.
Not really, no. While the media is very happy to talk about any incident where someone is killed by a handgun they are next to silent on all the incidents where a death or injury was avoided with the use of a firearm. It sounds counter intuitive, I know. But the numbers are there. Never forgot that plenty of people get injured or killed with no firearm related weapons.
Generally speaking they don't invalidate your felony convictions even if the laws change after the fact. Remember reading something about that in relation to bans on abortion. Maybe you can go before a judge and get it expunged from the records. That is... if you don't end up with a judge that still thinks the ban on whatever activity you were convicted of was a good idea or not.
Among non-gun nuts it is not well know that you can no legally sale or transfer a handgun across state lines. So unless you move somewhere with your handguns you have to buy them in the state or territory where you live. Although the Heller decision struck down outright prohibition or handguns in the cities of Chicago an Washington DC they are still not easy to get. In the case of the later there are no federally licensed gun dealers in the greater D.C. area. So you effective can not own a handgun there still. There has been attempts to chance that law but it continues to be to held in place by anti-self defense factions within the government. IE the political left.
As a small caveat this idea has no bearing upon the carrying of handguns. Which is still very VERY illegal in D.C. This is merely related to the near ownership of handguns. Which is pretty much the optimal weapon for self defense. Don't believe the hype that 'Double Barrel Biden' says about it.
Uhh.... yyoouu have no idea what you're talking about. At no point in your rambling statement of unconnected and generally false ideas did you make any sense.
I award you no points... and my Charlton Heston have mercy on your soul.
No, my problem is that I have a hole in my vision from a giant brain tumor... so unless they can put all the information to the left of my vision it's going to be a dicey preposition.
But if the take off them maybe they can be adjusted to fit my needs.
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds like a plan to me. Who's up for building the Sea Land International Space Port?
Well... I loath to throw the 'F' word around excessively. But given her voting record it honestly is a good fit. Very hawkish, very pro federal power, very anti liberty.
I... also hate to go so far as to call her supports sheep. But I just don't have a nicer way to put it. Perhaps it's the divisiveness of politics here in the US. A lot of people get it in their mind that if it's 'Right' it ain't right! And no one in her own party wants to challenge her for the position.
Well I made that quip because Feinstein purposed an amendment a while back that would strip certain journalistic protections under the first amendment UNLESS you worked for an established news organization. Which would give the federal government an avenue to attack anyone they didn't like the message of.
Better luck pissing on inalienable rights next time. Why not try banning the second amendment again. That'll make you feel better.
Full disclosure: I'm one of those 'climate skeptics' that journals are trying to silence. Not that I'm trying to write a paper about it. But the 'debate' about climate change really has started to degenerate into the level of fanaticism in decent years. And this news story is a perfect example of that.
The whole idea of writing a previewed scientific paper is to get your research out there and present it to so that the scientific community as a whole can pick it apart. Call it Darwinian research, if nothing else. And this is done via these journals. But if journals beginning throwing out papers that don't agree with their ideology the entire system starts to go all to shit!
It should not be the job of these editors to weed out dissenting options. What they need to be doing is letting people with 'crazy ideas' embarrasses themselves enough that they go away. If their idea is 'that crazy'.
Oh yeah! Or making your own knock off one of those Japanese Kuratas robots that were floating around a year or so back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iZ0WuNvHr8
Because humans are a war like species. They're most happy when blowing shit up.
I'd be so down with a nice set of powered armor peiced together in my own garage with a printer and a dremil tool. :D
... recognized that his administration has slipped up in allowing the NSA to have 100% free feign with civilian surveillance. Our bad.
To reward the citizens continued support of out cause we will be increasing the official ObamaChocolate programs weekly individual chocolate allowance from 30 grams to 25 grams.
*whi-TISH!*
...sponsored by PETA.
Well I don't know about THAT. But there for Aliens... So sounds legit to me!
.. but I've read a few news stories about several attempts to begin starting up the 'back end' that have all failed catastrophically. Like loosing the records of entire states catastrophically.
If nothing else we're all going to find out when they start trying to turn it all on.
I'd just as soon hit the rest on the lot of all three branches of the Federal Government myself.
... but I don't think firing everyone in charge of a massive project does a lot of good when it you're trying to make it work.
Well hell they have their own submarines and now large tunneling machines. Seems like drones are the next logical step.
If they get to the point where they have their own space program I say we just surrender in the war on drugs and let them run things.
Well... yes. But then again you can't really go out and buy those legally. I don't know what the laws on NFA weapons are in D.C. but I'm pretty sure they start with 'Don't even THINK about it.'
To be honest I'd probably keep an real IMI Uzi for defense. If I could get one.
Ahh, yes. Sorry I didn't put it well.
But yes. If you actually live in the D.C. you're kind of hooped. Unless someone actually manages to open a gun store that serves the general public. And I don't see think we'll see that happen any time soon.
Not really, no. While the media is very happy to talk about any incident where someone is killed by a handgun they are next to silent on all the incidents where a death or injury was avoided with the use of a firearm. It sounds counter intuitive, I know. But the numbers are there. Never forgot that plenty of people get injured or killed with no firearm related weapons.
Generally speaking they don't invalidate your felony convictions even if the laws change after the fact. Remember reading something about that in relation to bans on abortion. Maybe you can go before a judge and get it expunged from the records. That is... if you don't end up with a judge that still thinks the ban on whatever activity you were convicted of was a good idea or not.
Among non-gun nuts it is not well know that you can no legally sale or transfer a handgun across state lines. So unless you move somewhere with your handguns you have to buy them in the state or territory where you live. Although the Heller decision struck down outright prohibition or handguns in the cities of Chicago an Washington DC they are still not easy to get. In the case of the later there are no federally licensed gun dealers in the greater D.C. area. So you effective can not own a handgun there still. There has been attempts to chance that law but it continues to be to held in place by anti-self defense factions within the government. IE the political left.
As a small caveat this idea has no bearing upon the carrying of handguns. Which is still very VERY illegal in D.C. This is merely related to the near ownership of handguns. Which is pretty much the optimal weapon for self defense. Don't believe the hype that 'Double Barrel Biden' says about it.
Well the cynical part of me says: pretty much
Gun nuts are just a different kind of nerd.
Uhh.... yyoouu have no idea what you're talking about. At no point in your rambling statement of unconnected and generally false ideas did you make any sense.
I award you no points... and my Charlton Heston have mercy on your soul.
No, my problem is that I have a hole in my vision from a giant brain tumor... so unless they can put all the information to the left of my vision it's going to be a dicey preposition.
But if the take off them maybe they can be adjusted to fit my needs.
I love reading about stories like these... it tickles my nostalgia for things like ShadowRun and Cyberpunk.
Pity though... I probably could use them due to vision related neurological damage. -,,-