Good. They should use any means possible to find these law breakers. Why the hell should we have to put up with this rampant illegal immigration? Canada has even stricter immigration laws but no one says boo about that.
The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
This is patently absurd and assumes that 100 million people, almost a third of the country (including children), would take up arms and gladly give their lives for...what, exactly? Most people will never find even the most dystopian scenarios worthy of dying for. What you are describing is fantastical, fetishistic hogwash.
You all seem to think that the military and National Guard is just going to side with the government. Most will not. In fact they've asked them and 80% said they would side with the citizens, so yeah 100 million people with guns is about right.
They claimed Obama was a tyrant. No one stormed the white house or rose up in rebellion using their second amendment right provided guns. It just proves most gun owners are in severe need of viagara and they are using guns as a poor substitute.
So because a few people said Obama was a tyrant, the gun owning citizens of America were supposed to storm the freaking White House? And because they didn't it PROVES they have male-part issues? Damn, you gun grabbers get dumber by the minute. The only thing your little mental exercise actually proves is that 99.999% of gun owners are normal, perfectly sane people who wouldn't ever do something like that unless maybe a real tyrant was running the country. It also proves you have no reasoning skills whatsoever, or are so blinded by hatred of gun owners that you're unable to think properly.
I can't count how many times I've heard liberals claim that Trump is "literally Hitler." Should the gun owners storm the White House to fix this problem too, you stupid chode?
You're a true idiot. A government...any government...would much rather face an unarmed populace than an armed one. I may be no match for a government drone but I can guarantee you that no army, no matter how powerful, wants to go up against 100 million armed citizens. The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
I share their distrust of government, and particularly the people who buy our government and set its laws and policies.
I've yet to see anyone make a decent case of how guns would be a useful and/or effective means of remedying that.
Really? Here's one: A government...any government...would much rather face an unarmed populace than an armed one. I may be no match for a government drone but I can guarantee you that no army, no matter how powerful, wants to go up against 100 million armed citizens. The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
The verbiage of the label should say, "WARNING: The company that made this game is run by a bunch of greedy d-bags so you're only getting a partial, broken version of the game."
Hey sjames, don't waste your time with serviscope_minor. He's a professional douchebag who is incredibly arrogant and enjoys taking people's posts out of context and starting arguments. If you don't believe me, just read his past posts...HUGE douchebag.
Wow, calling me a pedophile as an anonymous coward. You must be a real big man. Google tailors its suggestions to your general searching habits, so if you're getting stuff about children in your suggestions, then maybe the police should be checking into you, you piece of shit.
Your hypothesis seems to be that anyone who doesn't want to be subjected to the more vile aspects of humanity is a "snowflake".
How do you figure? My post says no such thing. What it says is that forcing Google to censor their autocomplete in an attempt to hide people from the real world is turning humanity into snowflakes.
Don't like autocomplete? Turn it off! I don't need other people determining what I can and cannot see when searching the internet.
Slashdot Mirror
...don't be evil. YouTube's motto: "meh."
First he was going to use "courage" as the reason for dropping his account but...oh...wait...
Good. They should use any means possible to find these law breakers. Why the hell should we have to put up with this rampant illegal immigration? Canada has even stricter immigration laws but no one says boo about that.
It's a paradox based on the logic of an idiot...you.
The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
This is patently absurd and assumes that 100 million people, almost a third of the country (including children), would take up arms and gladly give their lives for...what, exactly? Most people will never find even the most dystopian scenarios worthy of dying for. What you are describing is fantastical, fetishistic hogwash.
You all seem to think that the military and National Guard is just going to side with the government. Most will not. In fact they've asked them and 80% said they would side with the citizens, so yeah 100 million people with guns is about right.
They claimed Obama was a tyrant. No one stormed the white house or rose up in rebellion using their second amendment right provided guns. It just proves most gun owners are in severe need of viagara and they are using guns as a poor substitute.
So because a few people said Obama was a tyrant, the gun owning citizens of America were supposed to storm the freaking White House? And because they didn't it PROVES they have male-part issues? Damn, you gun grabbers get dumber by the minute. The only thing your little mental exercise actually proves is that 99.999% of gun owners are normal, perfectly sane people who wouldn't ever do something like that unless maybe a real tyrant was running the country. It also proves you have no reasoning skills whatsoever, or are so blinded by hatred of gun owners that you're unable to think properly.
I can't count how many times I've heard liberals claim that Trump is "literally Hitler." Should the gun owners storm the White House to fix this problem too, you stupid chode?
You're a true idiot. A government...any government...would much rather face an unarmed populace than an armed one. I may be no match for a government drone but I can guarantee you that no army, no matter how powerful, wants to go up against 100 million armed citizens. The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
I share their distrust of government, and particularly the people who buy our government and set its laws and policies.
I've yet to see anyone make a decent case of how guns would be a useful and/or effective means of remedying that.
Really? Here's one: A government...any government...would much rather face an unarmed populace than an armed one. I may be no match for a government drone but I can guarantee you that no army, no matter how powerful, wants to go up against 100 million armed citizens. The government would basically have to destroy the entire country to beat 100 million people with guns.
You built and paid for YouTube, Mr. AC? I SERIOUSLY doubt that.
the tactical advantage of having a gun is lost as soon as someone is aware that you do in fact have a gun.
Riiiiiiight. You do realize that guns can fire real bullets, yes?
"No, no man. Shit no man. I believe you'd get your ass kicked for saying something like that, man."
It's about damn time we start putting an end to this idiocy.
Twitter is not journalism? Tell that to HuffPo!
Oooh, big man.
TBH I think you're greedy for wanting a 2018 AAA game at 2004's price point.
TBH I think you're a douche for posting disparaging, stupid, remarks as an anonymous coward.
The verbiage of the label should say, "WARNING: The company that made this game is run by a bunch of greedy d-bags so you're only getting a partial, broken version of the game."
I'm all for privacy, but this just sounds like another thing that could break on my phone.
Don't forget abput the teenaged brothers whom she had drugged and placed in front of a traon in the mid 1980s...
Now she's putting people in front of TRAONS! No, not the traons! Anything but the traons!!!!
Hey sjames, don't waste your time with serviscope_minor. He's a professional douchebag who is incredibly arrogant and enjoys taking people's posts out of context and starting arguments. If you don't believe me, just read his past posts...HUGE douchebag.
HuffPost is in a lot of trouble. They haven't written a "news" article without at least three tweets in it for two or three years!
There's probably some whiny SJW's out there that actually believe you.
Go away you whiny SJW. You completely twisted both my posts to fit your silly world view and I'm done trying to reason with you.
Wow, calling me a pedophile as an anonymous coward. You must be a real big man. Google tailors its suggestions to your general searching habits, so if you're getting stuff about children in your suggestions, then maybe the police should be checking into you, you piece of shit.
Your hypothesis seems to be that anyone who doesn't want to be subjected to the more vile aspects of humanity is a "snowflake".
How do you figure? My post says no such thing. What it says is that forcing Google to censor their autocomplete in an attempt to hide people from the real world is turning humanity into snowflakes.
Don't like autocomplete? Turn it off! I don't need other people determining what I can and cannot see when searching the internet.
Google showed me something I don't agree with! Better run back to my safe space and hide with my teddy bear. - smh
People in general are vile and disgusting, this is just another attempt to hide the real world from people and make them snowflakes.