Not really, given the wholesale and flagrant death penalties given to innocent men discovered and documented by Project Innocence. When cops screw up, they bury the evidence of the screwup, and often enough, the victim of their acts.
Exact copying? Not even close. Substantial similarity so as to confuse the market That is the legal standard. Thus Microsoft got away with stealing Windows from Mac, who got away with stealing from PARC, by making the "market" issue irrelevant
No. In fact, the 86% conviction rate says entirely the opposite It says that only the 14% of people who have enough money to fight back have any chance in court at all.
Is there any other kind? I give you Loreena Bobbit, who emasculated her drunk husband for sexing it up with another woman, then cried "rape attempt" and was LET OFF though there was zero evidence of the claimed rape. As the biker's said years ago " Remember that at trial, your future will be decided by 12 people so stupid they could not think of an excuse to get out of jury duty.
Proof please. $104 million taxpayer dollars produced ZERO convictions of ANY of Clinton's employees for acts on his watch or theirs. Contrast with the 32 convicts, holding an astonishing 129 felony pleas or convictions between them under Raygun Or 41's 16 (not counting the 8 unconstitutionally PARDONED BEFORE TRIAL (coverup?). Or 43's 15. Contrast Carter and Obama to the above Rogue's gallery Hate all you want, but remember who actually does the deed and has suffered for having been PROVEN to do the deed.
Glad someone thinks that the Net is not just a "Free" (as in paid for by users) carrier for profit-making entities that do NOT pay the costs of maintaining and expanding the distribution network. If there is any reason for a net, it is the open distribution of material governments and corporate slime would rather you not have unless THEY decide you should.
Wait. The accused will lose far more than time in jail if he gives up the password It follows then that this conduct by the Judge can never benefit the accused, who will thus never comply That makes contempt into punishment, rather than inducement. Without trial. In violation of Amendment 4, it it not?
A MINORITY rules the Capitalist world. the 1% own or directly control 88% of the value of stocks in the world. They ARE the boards of directors, and those people decide who eats. So how many less does it take to decide whose vote is to be counted? 5, actually.
is Capitalists. You, yes YOU mr. Republican, is that you showed the young how the game is rigged, bragged about it in fact, by running dynastic inheritors like Bush, Bush, Rmoney and now Trump, while "winning" by forbidding the counting of votes, rigging the voting booth and rejecting valid voters Surprise, your young have had ENOUGH of you. When the few rule by creating a false rhetoric of "meritocracy" while the true rulers are dynasties of wealth, the many WILL figure it out.
No, ISIS and AQ were deeply in bed with the encryption movement long ago. Now it's ordinary U.S. citizens, saving their rights against unreasonable search in defiance of criminal 3 lettered agencies of repression.
Good for you Snowden!
Snowden stopped the wholesale abrogation of civil rights, seven years sooner than the spies would like? Give that man the Medal of Freedom, HE earned it!
Oh, no question experience is valuable But don't bother trying to sell that idea to HR in an entrepreneurial business The ageist delusion is cast in iron now and does have SOME value to the 25-somethings running these businesses. The value is it reinforces their idea of how uniquely gifted they are since they can think of all obstacles before they are reached This is false, but they are not interested.
Telling the population at large that the "enemy" is forbidden to speak to them really gives the imprimatur of authority and validity to ISIS. Good job there, pentagon! Close brackes on the Sarcasm flag.
So clearly he never worked 75+ hour weeks on a normal work basis, like everyone else in the industry. With school requiring > 30 hours week, no one is "always learning" in any formal way
Face it, 100% of the "entrepeneurs" want to project a "young and vibrant" image and an ounce of Image is worth a ton of performance. So, Mr. Greybeard, find a new career, along with the other 115,000 former Engineers who "aged out" after 2008
So, in fact, there is no change to the 1st Amendment permitting either an establishment nor a prohibition, and the rights of regulation and taxation remain, thus Government Sanction of one claimed religion over another, or Government Sanction to the detriment of one or another, is still unlawful. Thanks for admitting you have no basis whatever to claim the 14th applies at all to the 1st Amendment right of the Prisoner, and the 1st Amendment burden on the state,
What? In what world is the 1st Amendment changed by inserting the definition of citizen and declaring the equal rights of same? The 14th equal protection, privileges and immunities clause changes nothing in the breadth of Congress power to regulate religious entities so long as they do not prohibit them. Nor does that amendment in any way grant respect to an establishment, nor permit one. Please cite your legal briefs, cases or codes which demonstrate this.
Not slippery slope Dedicated, right wing adventuring anti-porn crusader Gail Dines has been selling this for years Last week her pet website Yourbrainonporn.com got a writeup published in the MSM without critical debate Sure enough, the articles were lies and deciets and the stupid is strong with this one!
Not really, given the wholesale and flagrant death penalties given to innocent men discovered and documented by Project Innocence.
When cops screw up, they bury the evidence of the screwup, and often enough, the victim of their acts.
Exact copying? Not even close.
Substantial similarity so as to confuse the market
That is the legal standard. Thus Microsoft got away with stealing Windows from Mac, who got away with stealing from PARC, by making the "market" issue irrelevant
No. In fact, the 86% conviction rate says entirely the opposite
It says that only the 14% of people who have enough money to fight back have any chance in court at all.
Is there any other kind?
I give you Loreena Bobbit, who emasculated her drunk husband for sexing it up with another woman, then cried "rape attempt" and was LET OFF though there was zero evidence of the claimed rape.
As the biker's said years ago " Remember that at trial, your future will be decided by 12 people so stupid they could not think of an excuse to get out of jury duty.
And if intent meant anything, Gore won Florida. By more than 48000 votes (butterfly ballot).
but it doesn't.
Hillary had nothing to do with it
Just a little busy for reading the entirety. Hoping for a synopsis by the indulgent. Thanks for the update.
Ahhh, NO.
So long as the threat is credible, it is Terroristic threats and assault in the 3rd Degree
Proof please.
$104 million taxpayer dollars produced ZERO convictions of ANY of Clinton's employees for acts on his watch or theirs.
Contrast with the 32 convicts, holding an astonishing 129 felony pleas or convictions between them under Raygun
Or 41's 16 (not counting the 8 unconstitutionally PARDONED BEFORE TRIAL (coverup?).
Or 43's 15.
Contrast Carter and Obama to the above Rogue's gallery
Hate all you want, but remember who actually does the deed and has suffered for having been PROVEN to do the deed.
Is this a stack overflow condition and if so, how does it grant ring 0 access to attack code?
Glad someone thinks that the Net is not just a "Free" (as in paid for by users) carrier for profit-making entities that do NOT pay the costs of maintaining and expanding the distribution network.
If there is any reason for a net, it is the open distribution of material governments and corporate slime would rather you not have unless THEY decide you should.
Wait. The accused will lose far more than time in jail if he gives up the password
It follows then that this conduct by the Judge can never benefit the accused, who will thus never comply
That makes contempt into punishment, rather than inducement.
Without trial.
In violation of Amendment 4, it it not?
Well surprise, the FBI had broken into your favorite tool
Did you think you were ever going to speak freely?
Not in this country.
Corporations are owned by Capitalists
Nice try though
A MINORITY rules the Capitalist world.
the 1% own or directly control 88% of the value of stocks in the world.
They ARE the boards of directors, and those people decide who eats.
So how many less does it take to decide whose vote is to be counted?
5, actually.
is Capitalists.
You, yes YOU mr. Republican, is that you showed the young how the game is rigged, bragged about it in fact, by running dynastic inheritors like Bush, Bush, Rmoney and now Trump, while "winning" by forbidding the counting of votes, rigging the voting booth and rejecting valid voters
Surprise, your young have had ENOUGH of you.
When the few rule by creating a false rhetoric of "meritocracy" while the true rulers are dynasties of wealth, the many WILL figure it out.
No, ISIS and AQ were deeply in bed with the encryption movement long ago.
Now it's ordinary U.S. citizens, saving their rights against unreasonable search in defiance of criminal 3 lettered agencies of repression.
Good for you Snowden!
Snowden stopped the wholesale abrogation of civil rights, seven years sooner than the spies would like?
Give that man the Medal of Freedom, HE earned it!
Oh, no question experience is valuable
But don't bother trying to sell that idea to HR in an entrepreneurial business
The ageist delusion is cast in iron now and does have SOME value to the 25-somethings running these businesses.
The value is it reinforces their idea of how uniquely gifted they are since they can think of all obstacles before they are reached
This is false, but they are not interested.
Telling the population at large that the "enemy" is forbidden to speak to them really gives the imprimatur of authority and validity to ISIS.
Good job there, pentagon!
Close brackes on the Sarcasm flag.
So clearly he never worked 75+ hour weeks on a normal work basis, like everyone else in the industry.
With school requiring > 30 hours week, no one is "always learning" in any formal way
Face it, 100% of the "entrepeneurs" want to project a "young and vibrant" image
and an ounce of Image is worth a ton of performance.
So, Mr. Greybeard, find a new career, along with the other 115,000 former Engineers who "aged out" after 2008
So, in fact, there is no change to the 1st Amendment permitting either an establishment nor a prohibition, and the rights of regulation and taxation remain, thus Government Sanction of one claimed religion over another, or Government Sanction to the detriment of one or another, is still unlawful.
Thanks for admitting you have no basis whatever to claim the 14th applies at all to the 1st Amendment right of the Prisoner, and the 1st Amendment burden on the state,
What?
In what world is the 1st Amendment changed by inserting the definition of citizen and declaring the equal rights of same?
The 14th equal protection, privileges and immunities clause changes nothing in the breadth of Congress power to regulate religious entities so long as they do not prohibit them.
Nor does that amendment in any way grant respect to an establishment, nor permit one.
Please cite your legal briefs, cases or codes which demonstrate this.
Not slippery slope
Dedicated, right wing adventuring anti-porn crusader Gail Dines has been selling this for years
Last week her pet website Yourbrainonporn.com got a writeup published in the MSM without critical debate
Sure enough, the articles were lies and deciets
and the stupid is strong with this one!
Say it ain't so!
The one visual slasher effect movie ws QUITE enough!