I think the physical sciences might be a little different. I am in social sciences and have done the same kind of statistical study I have found that the pre-published slides depends more on the individual student. Yes, some students use them as a crutch and don't study as hard. I also tracked when the students download the lecture slides. The students that download them the night before class or earlier had the best scores. The students who downloaded right before class or later usually had lesser scores. The students who never downloaded the slides usually had the lowest scores. Of course, there are always outliers but I think this pattern shows that it is how the student chooses to use the slides. I tell my students this information on the first day of class and I include it as a note in the syllabus. I will also say that it seems statistically significant that a grandparent is more likely to die around the time of an exam than at any other time of the year.
Students do have to take responsibility for doing their work. My best students are the ones who like to have the information early. I like to give them what the want. I tell all my students to not wait until the last minute if they want to do well in my classes. I answers their emails quickly and am even available to chat online outside of office hours at times. One of the keys to using technology is to use it correctly. PowerPoint has one of the biggest upsides when used right and one of the biggest downsides when used wrong. I will admit that I have seen far more bad PowerPoint presentations than good ones. Every instructor should have a class on making good PowerPoint lectures. It is really just a supplement to class learning. If a student tries to go on only those, they will not do well.
Microsoft OneNote on my XP tablet was the best thing ever. I could write my notes, record the lecture and have it indexed to the notes at the same time. If I was not fast enough in my writing I would put [check audio] down and then come back later and finish the note while keeping up with the instructor.
I would do that, but my handwriting is so horrible on the white boards that I lose too much class time. I usually just do major points on the PowerPoint and then back it up with extra lecture information. I usually post the class PowerPoint online the night before so students can print them off and then write notes on them or make notes on the PowerPoint on a computer of the additional information. Sometimes, I will put extra info on the white boards when I want to make a point. However, I also put numerous small breakpoints in to give everyone a chance to catch up and ask questions. I have found that most students in my classes do better if they have a copy of the PowerPoint ahead of time to make notes on. Many will even look through it before class and will have questions ready to go. PowerPoint is not evil if it used as a proper suppliment. In my case, they tend to be lecture outlines with pictures and urls to outside sources. Plus, I also keep a minimum of five minutes per slide in most cases (picture only slides and intro slides are not included).
A doctor and a student are not the same thing. If a student misses a call, in most cases, there is no immediate danger to someones life. Truthfully, just because something is done one way in the "real world" it does not mean it is correct. The phone is one of the rudest devices ever created. It allows anyone to barge into someones conversation without thought of if the interruption is important or not. I actually do not answer my phone when I am having a conversation with someone unless I was expecting the call, in which cases I excuse myself before I answer.
Now, having been at many business conferences, there is usually nothing important happening at 90% of them, so an interruption is not that big of a deal. Yes, most people are involved with their own businesses at conferences. However, in a classroom environment, maybe 0.1% of the students I have ever had owned their own business while they were in my class. You are really talking about students who live their life attached to the phone either through text messages or just talking. Sometimes in a night class, a student has a business need for the phone to be on. I will work with them. However, in this case, the university has it right over the real world. 99.9% of the calls that university students get are not important. Plus, there are ways of handling a vibration phone in a classroom environment to make it more noticeable and most of the students are much more sensitive to their phones than some of us older folks.
I have to agree with this. Class size is a major determinant in how a class is going to work. Sometimes the instructors job is more of a captain/navigator. The job is to lead the discussion in the proper direction and get it back on track when it starts to go off on tangents that are not the current lesson. The lower-level classes do not offer the ability to do this most of the time. Your policy is the best fit.
My class rules are simple. Phones off unless you let me know you are expecting an important call. In that case, let me know, set the phone on vibrate and you sit in the seat adjacent to the door so you can slip out the door. During quizzes and exams, phones must be turned off and stored in a bag underneath the seat. If expecting a call, phone is up at my podium during hat time.
The simple fact is that phones are disruptive in class. The rules are set forth at the beginning of the semester in the syllabus and discussed in detail. The student has the option to drop me class and take another one if they wish. Now this is for the bigger classes. In smaller classes, I am less strict on the phones. But when you have a class with 45 students, a phone ringing every class session is disruptive.
As far as the argument of emergency alerts that are done by the campus, the classroom building has a full audio emergency alert system in every classroom. So none of those will be missed.
You make a blanket assumption that everyone learns well without lectures. You are wrong. Some students need audio and visual interaction to learn. Online learning is not a panacea. It works well for those students who are very self motivated. Some students need more interaction. Plus, what is filler for you is something very important for another student. Someone may be taking World Geography class as a filler class while others in the same class are in it because they want to be in it.
I have taught college classes. I find that the students tend to self segregate themselves within the classroom if someone is doing something distracting. There is no need for a blanket ban on laptops in the class. Just set simple ground rules and enforce them. In my basic classes, I offer flexibility to students. Notes are uploaded online and assignments are turned in online. In class quizzes and exams are announced at the start of the semester. Some people don't need the lectures. I keep track of attendance for statistical reasons. There are students who attend every lecture but barely pass and there are students who attend very few and do very well. However, those tend to be the outliers.
In the many classes I have taken, the best was an all lecture class that had a massive take home open book exam. I probably got more out of that class than any other. The worst was an online class where the instructor had everything up at the start of the semester and had a proctored exam. It was content poor and seemed to be just a class to get people credit. It required little to no effort to pass. It is not the format that matters as much as it is the competence of the instructor to deliver the information.
I exchange for cash on foreign trips before I leave on the low level items: Cabs, tips(if culturally needed) and other small purchases. With the credit card I use, I have found it to be quite competitive on exchange rates and a lot more practical when traveling in places where having a lot of cash is not always safe. My rule is that if it is less than $50, I will pay cash at home and abroad. I never like to carry more than $100US. Credit cards are fine to use in the proper circumstance. I don't ever use a debit card, though. I have a card that is strictly an ATM card. I was burned by double charge on a debt card that was just too much of a hassle to fix and made it not worth it to me anymore. Regular credit cards offer a higher level of protection.
This is more of the South Koreans misunderstanding American culture than the other way around. You have a satire aimed at showing Americans, the target audience, how 20th Century Fox, as a proxy for just about any large multinational corporation, exploits labor in a foreign land for profit. Satire tends to go for hyperbole to make a point. The American people do not think anything about how the process to create the items they consume actually occurs. Most people are smart enough to understand that is not really how it works. It is also not like they could depict another animation property to satire. The guilt is not meant to be placed on the people of Asia as much as it meant to be put on the American audience itself.
This system worked best for me. I did about five years of community college for the first two years of college going to class at night while working and saving money during the day. Now I had been in my tech job for 15 years at the time I decided to go back to school. My skills were getting stale and I saw that the work I was doing was going to be going away. My job was slated to be eliminated so I had year warning and got a one year buy out. Finished my AA two months after the job ended, sold my house and moved to go to a state university that took all the credits. I finished my BS in a year and a half and am now three years into postgrad (with stipend). I will have about $40K in student loans when I am done but should be able to transition to a new job pretty easily late next year. The guys I know who took the online college route currently have about $40K in loans, a degree but no hope for a job. I was lucky.
No wonder my evaluations for my students were so low for the Freshman level World Geography class I taught this summer. I actually gave out 25% of the grades below a B-. I thought I was actually too easy. Of course, 80% of the students expected an A.
In graduate school, I have yet to have a final exam except in one class that was a split with an undergrad class. For most Geography classes, I would rather assign a project/paper to have done. Unfortunately, my university requires finals for all undergrad classes. However, the hardest final I ever had was a take home final in a summer class where the finals requirement is not as strict.
Then again, Geography is also beneath Harvard and Yale to even have a class in. Maybe that explains way George W Bush thought invading Iraq to be a good idea.
The problem with relying on the odometer for tax purposes is that there are a number of clever ways to prevent it from racking up miles.
A problem that of course doesn't exist with GPS.
What do you mean a problem that doesn't exist? GPS doesn't work in tunnels. It is not always effective nor accurate in cities. I could "foil" the GPS receiver in many ways. The system is going to have to require a hardwire to the odometer or an odometer like system as a double check. It is going to require a way to update maps in order to be able to identify the driving done on private roads if it is going to be per mile. Plus, it will have to know when you crossed the border into Canada or Mexico. A data receiving network to obtain the data is going to be a nightmare. The number of nodes needed for this system will be insanely expensive to cover rural areas. Data privacy will be a major concern.
I don't break the law; but this one may turn me into a criminal if it comes to pass. The receiver will never get a sat lock if it is in my car and I will sit in jail fighting this one until I die. Give me a non-tracking option.
The Canyon looks to be a man made trench. The walls were almost vertical and it was a straight line. Plus, Kirk had to slam through a gate to get to it which makes it seem like it might have been a quarry.
The degree is useless without accreditation, unless you are going to be "teaching/researching" at some phony baloney religious school that does not require certifications or accreditations.
Maybe its time to end the all you can eat buffet. You either get speed or you get data. If you want the speed, you pay more once you exceed a center data threshold. You can get both if you want to pay for both or you can just get data and suffer lower speeds.
One or the other, the all you can eat data buffet is no longer a sane business model.
Oil taxes are not needed. Natural supply pressures will push the cost of oil up over $70/barrel soon. As supply pressure grows, price goes up and people will begin to conserve on their own.
I don't mind the tax idea, except, I can assure you the government would funnel it to something stupid. Like a recent $24M funneled to finding out how to genetically engineer pork to taste better. [Not joking]
What happens when MS use the information gathered during the auto updates to isolate more pirated keys? They can just easily embed something in an automatic critical update with some other security patch to start disabling pirated copies. Using the automated system will just mean that folks won't know what hit them until it is too late.
Science has been an evolving situation for centuries. Ultimately, the science done in the 17th through 19th centuries was much purer then it is today.
I do have a strong belief that the peer review system has been corrupted by pecuniary interests. Corrupted enough to discard it? No, but enough that I find it just as important to find out who funded the research as the actual results. In Global Warming, the most radical warnings tend to come from groups who are strongest on protecting the enviroment. The weakest findings come from those funded by coal and oil interests. Obviously the truth is somewhere in the middle.
The nature of science today is that it is interest driven. If you have been hired by a certain group, you are going to be predisposed to interpet the findings in a way that is more agreeable with your funding source.
We are still in the dark ages when it comes to climate forecasting. Hence some of my comparison to centuries ago. We do not have the skill, data or computing power needed to properly simulate future climate. CO2 emmisions do need to be cut. More money needs to be put forward to better technology. It is going to take government intervention to accomplish this; but it must be an appropriatly measured response. I am not personally sold that the danger is as dire as some are saying. I think the atmosphere is more dynamic and flexible then others say it is. However, I think caution is in order and the action must be taken now. I am certainly not dismissing anything. I just take a cynical view on a lot of todays science.
Sorry, I was using hyperbole with an incorrect date. However the date is not really pertinent to my point. Simple point is that a scientific consensus has not always been the most accurate thing in the world. However, I am not disputing global warming. Only some of the extreme conclusions based on the information available.
Now is the time to act. I do not feel that extreme rhetoric helps the cause, though.
Of course, 600 years ago a "peer review" would call you a crank for saying the world was round.
There is human influence on the climate. The harder question to answer is to what degree and how fast? Most of the global simulations have some pretty fatal flaws. Some do not account for the oceans ability to hold heat very well. Others do not take into account how changing currents in the deep levels of the oceans will affect upper currents. Heck, the GFS[NOAA's main forecast model] had a 30 degree miss on the weather in New England this past weekend three days out. Computer modeling is not the be all end all.
This is not to say that nothing needs to be done. I think there is a bit of Chicken Little in the research community. Especially the ones who know that fear brings them more funding.
Some have stated Kyoto was a "start." In international treaties, there are no such things as starts. Once you get a bad treaty, you tend to be stuck with the damn thign forever because the other countries feel like they did what they needed to do. That is politics. You can not accept a bad treaty like Kyoto. It had major flaws and would have been a band aide on a monster gash.
Is the administration doing enough, hell no? However, Kyoto flat out sucked as a treaty goes. It had been rendered as nothing but a way for third world countries to make money by selling their pollution rights. It was full BS.
Easy way to disable the ones in central Florida is to place them in the glove compartment or use the static bag for them. I have the E-Pass and love it for tolls. I usually throw it on the dash when approaching a booth and then hide it away to avoid the other trackers.
I'm not so concerned that they are using them to estimate travel times. My only worry is if they start extrapolating the times between two points and issuing speeding tickets.
But using the technology also initiates children to the idea that its perfectly normal for an authority to monitor their every movement, so 10 years down the line, when tags like this are required for government business or even just your time tracking, there will be no questions asked
Where is this different from taking attendence? This is just an electronic way of doing it. Doing it on the bus is just another cover for the schools in our lawyer/litigation happy society.
As long as these are only on busses or at the entrances to schools, I have no problem with them. If they are used for internal tracking, that is going a bit overboard.
This is a reasonable use of the technology.
I am not trolling on this as some clodhoppers think by the moderation. The legal enviroment has created this morass. However, you know what? My office has the same system. I can not get into the building without my electronic pass key. My company does not go as far as to use it as a time clock. However, what is the difference between this and punching a card in a time clock? It is just a newer version of the technology.
As far as the idea that this will lead to "embedded chips", that is something that will lead to a huge fight. There are fights worth fighting. This is not one of them.
Slashdot Mirror
I think the physical sciences might be a little different. I am in social sciences and have done the same kind of statistical study I have found that the pre-published slides depends more on the individual student. Yes, some students use them as a crutch and don't study as hard. I also tracked when the students download the lecture slides. The students that download them the night before class or earlier had the best scores. The students who downloaded right before class or later usually had lesser scores. The students who never downloaded the slides usually had the lowest scores. Of course, there are always outliers but I think this pattern shows that it is how the student chooses to use the slides. I tell my students this information on the first day of class and I include it as a note in the syllabus. I will also say that it seems statistically significant that a grandparent is more likely to die around the time of an exam than at any other time of the year.
Students do have to take responsibility for doing their work. My best students are the ones who like to have the information early. I like to give them what the want. I tell all my students to not wait until the last minute if they want to do well in my classes. I answers their emails quickly and am even available to chat online outside of office hours at times. One of the keys to using technology is to use it correctly. PowerPoint has one of the biggest upsides when used right and one of the biggest downsides when used wrong. I will admit that I have seen far more bad PowerPoint presentations than good ones. Every instructor should have a class on making good PowerPoint lectures. It is really just a supplement to class learning. If a student tries to go on only those, they will not do well.
Microsoft OneNote on my XP tablet was the best thing ever. I could write my notes, record the lecture and have it indexed to the notes at the same time. If I was not fast enough in my writing I would put [check audio] down and then come back later and finish the note while keeping up with the instructor.
I would do that, but my handwriting is so horrible on the white boards that I lose too much class time. I usually just do major points on the PowerPoint and then back it up with extra lecture information. I usually post the class PowerPoint online the night before so students can print them off and then write notes on them or make notes on the PowerPoint on a computer of the additional information. Sometimes, I will put extra info on the white boards when I want to make a point. However, I also put numerous small breakpoints in to give everyone a chance to catch up and ask questions. I have found that most students in my classes do better if they have a copy of the PowerPoint ahead of time to make notes on. Many will even look through it before class and will have questions ready to go. PowerPoint is not evil if it used as a proper suppliment. In my case, they tend to be lecture outlines with pictures and urls to outside sources. Plus, I also keep a minimum of five minutes per slide in most cases (picture only slides and intro slides are not included).
A doctor and a student are not the same thing. If a student misses a call, in most cases, there is no immediate danger to someones life. Truthfully, just because something is done one way in the "real world" it does not mean it is correct. The phone is one of the rudest devices ever created. It allows anyone to barge into someones conversation without thought of if the interruption is important or not. I actually do not answer my phone when I am having a conversation with someone unless I was expecting the call, in which cases I excuse myself before I answer.
Now, having been at many business conferences, there is usually nothing important happening at 90% of them, so an interruption is not that big of a deal. Yes, most people are involved with their own businesses at conferences. However, in a classroom environment, maybe 0.1% of the students I have ever had owned their own business while they were in my class. You are really talking about students who live their life attached to the phone either through text messages or just talking. Sometimes in a night class, a student has a business need for the phone to be on. I will work with them. However, in this case, the university has it right over the real world. 99.9% of the calls that university students get are not important. Plus, there are ways of handling a vibration phone in a classroom environment to make it more noticeable and most of the students are much more sensitive to their phones than some of us older folks.
I have to agree with this. Class size is a major determinant in how a class is going to work. Sometimes the instructors job is more of a captain/navigator. The job is to lead the discussion in the proper direction and get it back on track when it starts to go off on tangents that are not the current lesson. The lower-level classes do not offer the ability to do this most of the time. Your policy is the best fit.
My class rules are simple. Phones off unless you let me know you are expecting an important call. In that case, let me know, set the phone on vibrate and you sit in the seat adjacent to the door so you can slip out the door. During quizzes and exams, phones must be turned off and stored in a bag underneath the seat. If expecting a call, phone is up at my podium during hat time.
The simple fact is that phones are disruptive in class. The rules are set forth at the beginning of the semester in the syllabus and discussed in detail. The student has the option to drop me class and take another one if they wish. Now this is for the bigger classes. In smaller classes, I am less strict on the phones. But when you have a class with 45 students, a phone ringing every class session is disruptive.
As far as the argument of emergency alerts that are done by the campus, the classroom building has a full audio emergency alert system in every classroom. So none of those will be missed.
You make a blanket assumption that everyone learns well without lectures. You are wrong. Some students need audio and visual interaction to learn. Online learning is not a panacea. It works well for those students who are very self motivated. Some students need more interaction. Plus, what is filler for you is something very important for another student. Someone may be taking World Geography class as a filler class while others in the same class are in it because they want to be in it.
I have taught college classes. I find that the students tend to self segregate themselves within the classroom if someone is doing something distracting. There is no need for a blanket ban on laptops in the class. Just set simple ground rules and enforce them. In my basic classes, I offer flexibility to students. Notes are uploaded online and assignments are turned in online. In class quizzes and exams are announced at the start of the semester. Some people don't need the lectures. I keep track of attendance for statistical reasons. There are students who attend every lecture but barely pass and there are students who attend very few and do very well. However, those tend to be the outliers.
In the many classes I have taken, the best was an all lecture class that had a massive take home open book exam. I probably got more out of that class than any other. The worst was an online class where the instructor had everything up at the start of the semester and had a proctored exam. It was content poor and seemed to be just a class to get people credit. It required little to no effort to pass. It is not the format that matters as much as it is the competence of the instructor to deliver the information.
The US Government version of the cloud will have a direct line to Wikileaks to save time.
I exchange for cash on foreign trips before I leave on the low level items: Cabs, tips(if culturally needed) and other small purchases. With the credit card I use, I have found it to be quite competitive on exchange rates and a lot more practical when traveling in places where having a lot of cash is not always safe. My rule is that if it is less than $50, I will pay cash at home and abroad. I never like to carry more than $100US. Credit cards are fine to use in the proper circumstance. I don't ever use a debit card, though. I have a card that is strictly an ATM card. I was burned by double charge on a debt card that was just too much of a hassle to fix and made it not worth it to me anymore. Regular credit cards offer a higher level of protection.
This is more of the South Koreans misunderstanding American culture than the other way around. You have a satire aimed at showing Americans, the target audience, how 20th Century Fox, as a proxy for just about any large multinational corporation, exploits labor in a foreign land for profit. Satire tends to go for hyperbole to make a point. The American people do not think anything about how the process to create the items they consume actually occurs. Most people are smart enough to understand that is not really how it works. It is also not like they could depict another animation property to satire. The guilt is not meant to be placed on the people of Asia as much as it meant to be put on the American audience itself.
This system worked best for me. I did about five years of community college for the first two years of college going to class at night while working and saving money during the day. Now I had been in my tech job for 15 years at the time I decided to go back to school. My skills were getting stale and I saw that the work I was doing was going to be going away. My job was slated to be eliminated so I had year warning and got a one year buy out. Finished my AA two months after the job ended, sold my house and moved to go to a state university that took all the credits. I finished my BS in a year and a half and am now three years into postgrad (with stipend). I will have about $40K in student loans when I am done but should be able to transition to a new job pretty easily late next year. The guys I know who took the online college route currently have about $40K in loans, a degree but no hope for a job. I was lucky.
No wonder my evaluations for my students were so low for the Freshman level World Geography class I taught this summer. I actually gave out 25% of the grades below a B-. I thought I was actually too easy. Of course, 80% of the students expected an A.
In graduate school, I have yet to have a final exam except in one class that was a split with an undergrad class. For most Geography classes, I would rather assign a project/paper to have done. Unfortunately, my university requires finals for all undergrad classes. However, the hardest final I ever had was a take home final in a summer class where the finals requirement is not as strict.
Then again, Geography is also beneath Harvard and Yale to even have a class in. Maybe that explains way George W Bush thought invading Iraq to be a good idea.
Damn, that is what happens when I don't drink and post. I need to remember to drink before reading /.
The problem with relying on the odometer for tax purposes is that there are a number of clever ways to prevent it from racking up miles.
A problem that of course doesn't exist with GPS.
What do you mean a problem that doesn't exist? GPS doesn't work in tunnels. It is not always effective nor accurate in cities. I could "foil" the GPS receiver in many ways. The system is going to have to require a hardwire to the odometer or an odometer like system as a double check. It is going to require a way to update maps in order to be able to identify the driving done on private roads if it is going to be per mile. Plus, it will have to know when you crossed the border into Canada or Mexico. A data receiving network to obtain the data is going to be a nightmare. The number of nodes needed for this system will be insanely expensive to cover rural areas. Data privacy will be a major concern.
I don't break the law; but this one may turn me into a criminal if it comes to pass. The receiver will never get a sat lock if it is in my car and I will sit in jail fighting this one until I die. Give me a non-tracking option.
The Canyon looks to be a man made trench. The walls were almost vertical and it was a straight line. Plus, Kirk had to slam through a gate to get to it which makes it seem like it might have been a quarry.
The degree is useless without accreditation, unless you are going to be "teaching/researching" at some phony baloney religious school that does not require certifications or accreditations.
Maybe its time to end the all you can eat buffet. You either get speed or you get data. If you want the speed, you pay more once you exceed a center data threshold. You can get both if you want to pay for both or you can just get data and suffer lower speeds.
One or the other, the all you can eat data buffet is no longer a sane business model.
Oil taxes are not needed. Natural supply pressures will push the cost of oil up over $70/barrel soon. As supply pressure grows, price goes up and people will begin to conserve on their own.
I don't mind the tax idea, except, I can assure you the government would funnel it to something stupid. Like a recent $24M funneled to finding out how to genetically engineer pork to taste better. [Not joking]
What happens when MS use the information gathered during the auto updates to isolate more pirated keys? They can just easily embed something in an automatic critical update with some other security patch to start disabling pirated copies. Using the automated system will just mean that folks won't know what hit them until it is too late.
unemployed and voluntarily removing himself from the gene pool.
Science has been an evolving situation for centuries. Ultimately, the science done in the 17th through 19th centuries was much purer then it is today.
I do have a strong belief that the peer review system has been corrupted by pecuniary interests. Corrupted enough to discard it? No, but enough that I find it just as important to find out who funded the research as the actual results. In Global Warming, the most radical warnings tend to come from groups who are strongest on protecting the enviroment. The weakest findings come from those funded by coal and oil interests. Obviously the truth is somewhere in the middle.
The nature of science today is that it is interest driven. If you have been hired by a certain group, you are going to be predisposed to interpet the findings in a way that is more agreeable with your funding source.
We are still in the dark ages when it comes to climate forecasting. Hence some of my comparison to centuries ago. We do not have the skill, data or computing power needed to properly simulate future climate. CO2 emmisions do need to be cut. More money needs to be put forward to better technology. It is going to take government intervention to accomplish this; but it must be an appropriatly measured response. I am not personally sold that the danger is as dire as some are saying. I think the atmosphere is more dynamic and flexible then others say it is. However, I think caution is in order and the action must be taken now. I am certainly not dismissing anything. I just take a cynical view on a lot of todays science.
Sorry, I was using hyperbole with an incorrect date. However the date is not really pertinent to my point. Simple point is that a scientific consensus has not always been the most accurate thing in the world. However, I am not disputing global warming. Only some of the extreme conclusions based on the information available.
Now is the time to act. I do not feel that extreme rhetoric helps the cause, though.
Of course, 600 years ago a "peer review" would call you a crank for saying the world was round.
There is human influence on the climate. The harder question to answer is to what degree and how fast? Most of the global simulations have some pretty fatal flaws. Some do not account for the oceans ability to hold heat very well. Others do not take into account how changing currents in the deep levels of the oceans will affect upper currents. Heck, the GFS[NOAA's main forecast model] had a 30 degree miss on the weather in New England this past weekend three days out. Computer modeling is not the be all end all.
This is not to say that nothing needs to be done. I think there is a bit of Chicken Little in the research community. Especially the ones who know that fear brings them more funding.
Some have stated Kyoto was a "start." In international treaties, there are no such things as starts. Once you get a bad treaty, you tend to be stuck with the damn thign forever because the other countries feel like they did what they needed to do. That is politics. You can not accept a bad treaty like Kyoto. It had major flaws and would have been a band aide on a monster gash.
Is the administration doing enough, hell no? However, Kyoto flat out sucked as a treaty goes. It had been rendered as nothing but a way for third world countries to make money by selling their pollution rights. It was full BS.
Easy way to disable the ones in central Florida is to place them in the glove compartment or use the static bag for them. I have the E-Pass and love it for tolls. I usually throw it on the dash when approaching a booth and then hide it away to avoid the other trackers.
I'm not so concerned that they are using them to estimate travel times. My only worry is if they start extrapolating the times between two points and issuing speeding tickets.
But using the technology also initiates children to the idea that its perfectly normal for an authority to monitor their every movement, so 10 years down the line, when tags like this are required for government business or even just your time tracking, there will be no questions asked
Where is this different from taking attendence? This is just an electronic way of doing it. Doing it on the bus is just another cover for the schools in our lawyer/litigation happy society.
As long as these are only on busses or at the entrances to schools, I have no problem with them. If they are used for internal tracking, that is going a bit overboard.
This is a reasonable use of the technology.
I am not trolling on this as some clodhoppers think by the moderation. The legal enviroment has created this morass. However, you know what? My office has the same system. I can not get into the building without my electronic pass key. My company does not go as far as to use it as a time clock. However, what is the difference between this and punching a card in a time clock? It is just a newer version of the technology.
As far as the idea that this will lead to "embedded chips", that is something that will lead to a huge fight. There are fights worth fighting. This is not one of them.