To my limited knowledge of the American politics, _any_ citizen of the United States of America who are not charged with crime can run for political office
Actually, to run for president it's not enough just to be a citizen, you have to be born in the US. Sorry Ahnold, no naturalized citizens in the White House!
To be fair, we had two terms from a republican governor / governator, but he's a RINO. Also the rebuts have maintained a large enough minority to torpedo any funding legislation since any tax changes require 67% supermaj. Also they have not hesitated to legislate at the ballot box, c.f. Prop 8.
-I'm not sure how much power (as opposed to voltage) tasers put out---
The Internet says "The TASER® devices release an electric current (TASER® C2 - 30 seconds of 50,000 volts at 7 watts, TASER® M26c - 5 seconds of 50,000 volts at 26 watts)". The low wattage makes sense ecause they're powered by 9v batteries.
this is another perfect example. such little respect for the craft of acting that he is happy to overdub, pixel over, or make any other change like people contribute no more than animatronics do.
-1 disagree. a costume isn't a problem, but blocking the face is a problem. the face is how an actor expresses emotion, and if you block the face then it might as well be cgi.
who has their face occluded in LOTR? I can't think of a single major character with the exception of gollum.
i think you can really see lucas' attitude toward the craft of acting when you consider how many actors he put behind costumes or even took away any lines.
hidden behind costumes: * darth vader * yoda * c3po * jabba and many more
no lines: * darth maul
costume AND no lines: * r2 * chewie * that bounty hunter guy whose name escapes me * ewoks
CNG, fuck the actors cuz who needs them: * jar jar * basically everybody from the latter movies except for the main actors and samuel jackson.
it's clear, lucas has a disdain for actors that is unique in all of cinema.
the wind was already taken out of the second hand market by having an anti-theft lock turned on by default. if you went to craigslist to buy a phone, you need to know if there is an antitheft lock on, because if you try to reset and install your own stuff, you could have bought a phone that you can't use. There are more structured options like amazon (buying direct, not from a marketplace person) or gazelle, but they get their markups.
Right now I'm still using my two-year-old iphone 5. Once I got out of my att contract I took it to an mvno for prepaid service. I chose rok mobile for the best balance of low cost and high data cap.
Reason number 48372534786 why it's better just to universally block advertisements on the internet.
Apple has been leading on this front with several initiatives to protect users from malicious ads. One of them was a setting in Safari to only accept cookies from the first-party site, so when you go to cnn.com the browser accepts a cookie from cnn.com but not from malvertiser.com, who has a banner ad on the site.
This upset google because it cut into their business model of selling effective ad space. So google inserted malicious code into webpages to hack the safari browser and override security settings so it could download unwanted and potentially malicious files onto users computers. Because of this, google received the biggest fine in FTC history and is being sued for privacy violations in the UK.
Think about this for a second, and what it means. A website overriding browser security settings to serve unwanted and possibly malicious files. This is outrageous and unethical, and if it were Microsoft then the entire internet community would be enraged. Also think about it in light of this article on malvertisements, which google was actively propagating.
Apple has since taken the cat and mouse game further, so the setting is "allow from current website only". I expect malvertisers to scramble to overcome this block, but I hope that legitimate respected top tier internet companies act a little more ethically.
if it were my summary I would definitely attribute it to somebody else, because it makes absolutely no sense. what does this mean? "But what about when Yahoo, CNN.com, TMZ and other busy destination sites heave disaster upon visitors?" what does the rest of the summary mean?
People who define themselves by the shit they own will eat this up!
I agree. apple users are snobs who define their identities by showing off their gadgets. I don't go near that, this is why I have a nexus one and moto360 writs watch along with a galaxy tab and chromebook on which I'm running Linux.
Very insightful. It would seem that you could build a simple processing facility to distill out propane from the hydrocarbon muck. Yeah would need a similar facility for purified methane anyway, so what's the diff? Not much.
Slashdot Mirror
likely she carried a pack of bills along with the dope when she crossed the border.
Try audio quality on FaceTime. It's like the person is stanting in your ear. Also try volte.
High level what what? Her gf convinced her to carry some contraband across the border. She was a drug mule.
Try and find a single case in which a drunk driver or hit and run driver who has killed someone gets 18 years in jail.
Nailed it!
http://www.adn.com/article/201...
http://www.kokomotribune.com/n...
And. For the bonus point
http://www.9news.com/story/new...
To my limited knowledge of the American politics, _any_ citizen of the United States of America who are not charged with crime can run for political office
Actually, to run for president it's not enough just to be a citizen, you have to be born in the US. Sorry Ahnold, no naturalized citizens in the White House!
+1 truth.
To be fair, we had two terms from a republican governor / governator, but he's a RINO. Also the rebuts have maintained a large enough minority to torpedo any funding legislation since any tax changes require 67% supermaj. Also they have not hesitated to legislate at the ballot box, c.f. Prop 8.
Fuck-tard here. In the last election it was Feinstein vs. Fiorina. I voted for Feinstein.
-I'm not sure how much power (as opposed to voltage) tasers put out---
The Internet says "The TASER® devices release an electric current (TASER® C2 - 30 seconds of 50,000 volts at 7 watts, TASER® M26c - 5 seconds of 50,000 volts at 26 watts)". The low wattage makes sense ecause they're powered by 9v batteries.
And to be honest, though my hearing is fine I like having the captions (watch it on phone in bed while wife is sleeping).
They made a new invention called earmuffs and you put them on your wife.
If you say so, Tokyo.
this is another perfect example. such little respect for the craft of acting that he is happy to overdub, pixel over, or make any other change like people contribute no more than animatronics do.
Or producer who oversees character design, set design and overall story. Like in ep IV.
-1 disagree. a costume isn't a problem, but blocking the face is a problem. the face is how an actor expresses emotion, and if you block the face then it might as well be cgi.
who has their face occluded in LOTR? I can't think of a single major character with the exception of gollum.
i think you can really see lucas' attitude toward the craft of acting when you consider how many actors he put behind costumes or even took away any lines.
hidden behind costumes:
* darth vader
* yoda
* c3po
* jabba and many more
no lines:
* darth maul
costume AND no lines:
* r2
* chewie
* that bounty hunter guy whose name escapes me
* ewoks
CNG, fuck the actors cuz who needs them:
* jar jar
* basically everybody from the latter movies except for the main actors and samuel jackson.
it's clear, lucas has a disdain for actors that is unique in all of cinema.
I'm pretty sure spielburg wasn't involved in star wars in any way.
And what happened to productivity??? Down down down I bet.
the wind was already taken out of the second hand market by having an anti-theft lock turned on by default. if you went to craigslist to buy a phone, you need to know if there is an antitheft lock on, because if you try to reset and install your own stuff, you could have bought a phone that you can't use. There are more structured options like amazon (buying direct, not from a marketplace person) or gazelle, but they get their markups.
Right now I'm still using my two-year-old iphone 5. Once I got out of my att contract I took it to an mvno for prepaid service. I chose rok mobile for the best balance of low cost and high data cap.
Reason number 48372534786 why it's better just to universally block advertisements on the internet.
Apple has been leading on this front with several initiatives to protect users from malicious ads. One of them was a setting in Safari to only accept cookies from the first-party site, so when you go to cnn.com the browser accepts a cookie from cnn.com but not from malvertiser.com, who has a banner ad on the site.
This upset google because it cut into their business model of selling effective ad space. So google inserted malicious code into webpages to hack the safari browser and override security settings so it could download unwanted and potentially malicious files onto users computers. Because of this, google received the biggest fine in FTC history and is being sued for privacy violations in the UK.
Think about this for a second, and what it means. A website overriding browser security settings to serve unwanted and possibly malicious files. This is outrageous and unethical, and if it were Microsoft then the entire internet community would be enraged. Also think about it in light of this article on malvertisements, which google was actively propagating.
Apple has since taken the cat and mouse game further, so the setting is "allow from current website only". I expect malvertisers to scramble to overcome this block, but I hope that legitimate respected top tier internet companies act a little more ethically.
can I use HOSTS for this????
if it were my summary I would definitely attribute it to somebody else, because it makes absolutely no sense. what does this mean? "But what about when Yahoo, CNN.com, TMZ and other busy destination sites heave disaster upon visitors?" what does the rest of the summary mean?
People who define themselves by the shit they own will eat this up!
I agree. apple users are snobs who define their identities by showing off their gadgets. I don't go near that, this is why I have a nexus one and moto360 writs watch along with a galaxy tab and chromebook on which I'm running Linux.
Very insightful. It would seem that you could build a simple processing facility to distill out propane from the hydrocarbon muck. Yeah would need a similar facility for purified methane anyway, so what's the diff? Not much.
even though they might get some flame wars from people who are really into other brands of stoves.
Loool those would be awesome flame wars
half hour if you're lucky. theres a lot of black men to beat first!