when you give it to people with huge investment portfolios, you're incintivizing people to be ravenous asshole capitalists. this in turn creates jobs for other pepole. when you incentivize people to stay home and fap then not much work will get done.
i read the cop's testimony of the incident, and I was extraordinarily bewildered. the way the cop described MB's behavior, it just didn't make sense. non-insane people don't act the way that the cop said MB acted.
My life experience? People behave in reasonable ways, at least reasonable to them at the time. but here's how the cop described the incident: first, MB and friend are walking in the middle of the street. officer pulls up next to them in his SUV and starts hassling them about walking. MB tells him to fuck off. This makes sense to me.
Second, unbidden, MB walks over to the window to argue with the cop. He reaches in and puts his hands on the cop and reaches for his gun. This strikes me as very very false. would an 18 year old boy who had just nicked some swisher sweets go over to a cop car to argue? and then attack the cop? no, that doesn't make sense. an 18 yo would GTFO back home with his friend.
The incident description continues like this. the cop's story dovetails perfectly with the narrative needed for justified use of deadly force. gee i wonder why.
you're right, that is a crazy dream because the ebola outbreak tracker shows that the number of new cases has been relatively stable (albeit noisy) for the last couple weeks. contrary to the summary, however, the tracker shows that ebola cases are doubling every 46 days, not 2-3 weeks.
prices aren't increasing because the items themselves are inherently more expensive. prices rise because government actions (like the one you suggest) continually devalue the currency, so $1 from last year is only worth $0.97 this year. welcome to macroeconomics.
that's fine perhaps, my point is that ip addresses need to be treated with the same sensitivity as names and mailing addresses. To balance privacy against disclosure, there are rules for when names and addresses are withheld and when they are released. These rules should also apply to IP addresses.
I think the issue here is not with security but with privacy. for many people the ip address is PII (personally identifiable information). My hope ip is static and only used by me. so any records showing my ip address are equivalent to showing my home address. If we're going to protect people's PII we should be protecting IP addresses too.
But the same troll was likely used about GPS. Fuck cost effective. Banks create 10 times more money than governments. Fund space at zero cost through the Fed because it is a good idea, in the General Welfare. Why would creating money for space exploration cause inflation?
Btw Europe texted, they want their economic paradigms back
I'm just asking you to separate facts from your own conjecture. Fact: he was shot in the top of the head. Conjecture: what MB was doing that caused him to lower his head. I'll say again, if somebody shot me I'd crumple to the ground pretty quickly and my head could end up facing the attacker.
That (last) shot could only be fired while approaching the officer.
why would you believe this to be true? This looks like an unfounded assumption on your part. If I were shot in the belly, my first reaction would probably be to double over in pain, thus my head would be bowed before the officer.
the autopsy showed that he was charging the officer? I thought the autopsy just showed that he was shot in the top of the head, and you're speculating that it's because he was charting the officer. Or maybe it's a magical autopsy, I don't know.
of course there wasnt because the DA failed to articulate a specific narrative and presented all sorts of conflicting evidence. as the GP said, he threw the case.
for all we know, every single member of the grand jury believed officer wilson should be charged with a crime, but they couldn't agree on which crime. Normally the DA presents the grand jury with a yes/no decision. "I believe that this person is guilty of X, and here's why." In this case the DA gave the grand jury 6 choices from murder to oopsie-death, and failed to articulate any specific narrative for what could have happened. He said "here's all the evidence, and here's an array of charges. Tell me what you want me to do". It's proof that the DA never wanted an indictment and so he abused the grand jury process.
Only problem was: The fatal shot was fired when he was running / charging in the direction of the officer. (If you bothered to listen to the forensic evidence...
why would you believe that this is true? the DA purposely conducted a full trial in front of the grand jury so that all the testimony would be secret and the jury could not discuss their deliberations. We only have the statements of the DA's office about what may or may not have been said.
whats cool about car2go is you only pay for driving time. in zipcar you pay for the total rental time. so if you get a zipcar to go to walmart, you have to pay for all the time that it sits out in the lot.
for a startup, "sales" is getting funidng and then getting aquired. "customers" is VCs and larger slower companies in the same space. nobody gives a fig about any users.
Slashdot Mirror
that's why I never accept the eulas
when you give it to people with huge investment portfolios, you're incintivizing people to be ravenous asshole capitalists. this in turn creates jobs for other pepole. when you incentivize people to stay home and fap then not much work will get done.
+1 awesome.
i read the cop's testimony of the incident, and I was extraordinarily bewildered. the way the cop described MB's behavior, it just didn't make sense. non-insane people don't act the way that the cop said MB acted.
My life experience? People behave in reasonable ways, at least reasonable to them at the time. but here's how the cop described the incident: first, MB and friend are walking in the middle of the street. officer pulls up next to them in his SUV and starts hassling them about walking. MB tells him to fuck off. This makes sense to me.
Second, unbidden, MB walks over to the window to argue with the cop. He reaches in and puts his hands on the cop and reaches for his gun. This strikes me as very very false. would an 18 year old boy who had just nicked some swisher sweets go over to a cop car to argue? and then attack the cop? no, that doesn't make sense. an 18 yo would GTFO back home with his friend.
The incident description continues like this. the cop's story dovetails perfectly with the narrative needed for justified use of deadly force. gee i wonder why.
like stockbroker or president...
it's a visual representation of up-to-date data on wikipedia that is sourced from WHO. follow sources much? [citation provided]
you're right, that is a crazy dream because the ebola outbreak tracker shows that the number of new cases has been relatively stable (albeit noisy) for the last couple weeks. contrary to the summary, however, the tracker shows that ebola cases are doubling every 46 days, not 2-3 weeks.
prices aren't increasing because the items themselves are inherently more expensive. prices rise because government actions (like the one you suggest) continually devalue the currency, so $1 from last year is only worth $0.97 this year. welcome to macroeconomics.
that's fine perhaps, my point is that ip addresses need to be treated with the same sensitivity as names and mailing addresses. To balance privacy against disclosure, there are rules for when names and addresses are withheld and when they are released. These rules should also apply to IP addresses.
the Schwartz is with you!
what are you talking about? just redact the records. Records are often redacted to protect sensitive information for FOIA requests.
I think the issue here is not with security but with privacy. for many people the ip address is PII (personally identifiable information). My hope ip is static and only used by me. so any records showing my ip address are equivalent to showing my home address. If we're going to protect people's PII we should be protecting IP addresses too.
in san Francisco they pollard the trees, not for any specific purpose but more as an aesthetic. is this what they do by you?
the second dropped berries all over our lawn rendering our back yard unusable and attracting flies
these two statements contradict. by definition if your yard attracts flies it has a very significant and specific use.
what is githut. this word is in the summary. why. does it have a meaning? is it like pizza hut? or jabba the hutt?
But the same troll was likely used about GPS. Fuck cost effective. Banks create 10 times more money than governments. Fund space at zero cost through the Fed because it is a good idea, in the General Welfare. Why would creating money for space exploration cause inflation?
Btw Europe texted, they want their economic paradigms back
you already made these arguments and I already proved you wrong so I'm going to assume you have nothing more to add.
I'm just asking you to separate facts from your own conjecture. Fact: he was shot in the top of the head. Conjecture: what MB was doing that caused him to lower his head. I'll say again, if somebody shot me I'd crumple to the ground pretty quickly and my head could end up facing the attacker.
That (last) shot could only be fired while approaching the officer.
why would you believe this to be true? This looks like an unfounded assumption on your part. If I were shot in the belly, my first reaction would probably be to double over in pain, thus my head would be bowed before the officer.
the autopsy showed that he was charging the officer? I thought the autopsy just showed that he was shot in the top of the head, and you're speculating that it's because he was charting the officer. Or maybe it's a magical autopsy, I don't know.
of course there wasnt because the DA failed to articulate a specific narrative and presented all sorts of conflicting evidence. as the GP said, he threw the case.
for all we know, every single member of the grand jury believed officer wilson should be charged with a crime, but they couldn't agree on which crime. Normally the DA presents the grand jury with a yes/no decision. "I believe that this person is guilty of X, and here's why." In this case the DA gave the grand jury 6 choices from murder to oopsie-death, and failed to articulate any specific narrative for what could have happened. He said "here's all the evidence, and here's an array of charges. Tell me what you want me to do". It's proof that the DA never wanted an indictment and so he abused the grand jury process.
Only problem was: The fatal shot was fired when he was running / charging in the direction of the officer. (If you bothered to listen to the forensic evidence...
why would you believe that this is true? the DA purposely conducted a full trial in front of the grand jury so that all the testimony would be secret and the jury could not discuss their deliberations. We only have the statements of the DA's office about what may or may not have been said.
whats cool about car2go is you only pay for driving time. in zipcar you pay for the total rental time. so if you get a zipcar to go to walmart, you have to pay for all the time that it sits out in the lot.
for a startup, "sales" is getting funidng and then getting aquired. "customers" is VCs and larger slower companies in the same space. nobody gives a fig about any users.