Schrödinger got his initial idea from a correspondence with Einstein.
Albert said that if the Copenhagen Interpretation presented by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg were correct, a barrel of gunpowder is, at the same time, exploded and not exploded.
In agreement with that derisive point of view, Schrödinger came up with the cat paradox.
Both paradoxes have long been resolved by pointing out that objects as complex as barrels and cats are macroscopic.
Quantum mechanics applies on the microscopic scale and, to some degree on the mesoscopic.
Experimental physicists are trying to understand precisely where the delineation of scale is.
Meanwhile one-off thought experiments like this 9ne are plentiful.
We have a racist, self-admitted pussy-grabbing right wing batshit crazy evangelical Christian intolerant ass hat at the pinnacle of power and he's Teflon coated.
The current administration is taking advantage of a 1917 treaty and "because national security." to write executive orders that favour the wrong side of America.
States are countering with "states rights."
For reference, look at marijuana, vehicle emission/mpg limits, immigration, gun control, etc.
States can launch all the satellites they can afford and use tactics like that to circumvent a batshit cray cray executive and a non-performing congress.
In all three cases, whether state, executive or legislative, the People are speaking.
Slashdot Mirror
Insightful mod?
Not Offtopic?
Thanks.
Nah.
I'm not qualified to tell Google how to run its business and I don't have a stake in the whole "national security" bullshit.
Capitalism trumps nationalism.
As a shareholder, I'm interested in asymptotic gains over a period of time measured in nanoseconds.
If you're not talking money, you're not talking to me.
... because I don't live in China.
That sovereign country can make all the rules it wants.
Google is in the business of make money.
They can tailor their product to comply with local laws and regulations to do so.
Where's the beef?
I said instantly across distance.
It is not a violation of the light speed limit because the action does not involve information.
Citation, please.
Sorry.
You're mashing up the wave theory of the double-slit experiment that includes interference with wave collapse.
Superposition is another thing outside all that.
We are working hard on superposition and the jury's still out.
It's speculation and hard to prove because measurement causes decoherence.
You're confused.
General relativity addressed how space-time behaves in a gravitational field.
Special relativity describes the effects of velocity in differing frames of reference.
You are also mixing classical physics with quantum physics.
You have some of the vocabulary in your toolbox, but I'm afraid that's the extent of your understanding.
I suggest you read more.
That's what it takes.
Telling, is that you provide no citation of a poll.
I'm in this field (see what I did there) and science is not not a democracy wherein a 51% majority settles matters.
The wave collapse is instantaneous across any distance because the quantum measured is a single object (a wave).
There is no "information," transmitted during collapse, and therefore, no violation of the speed limit of light in a vacuum.
An index describes the positional status of a single playing card relative to a stack of them.
Some are out of the decks (outdex) and some are in the decks (index).
... and I don't allow remote access.
I have the shares disabled, as well.
I'm a photographer with gigabytes of photos and I store them in multiple locations, including this NAS.
Every now and then I log in through my WiFi and enable Share to copy new stuff to it.
Then I disable all Shares.
You are correct.
And, by "measurement," we don't mean "humans looking at it."
The "measurement problem" was settled long ago in that there are a shit load of "measuring devices."
When a quantum interacts with anything , that's a measurement.
Schrödinger got his initial idea from a correspondence with Einstein.
Albert said that if the Copenhagen Interpretation presented by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg were correct, a barrel of gunpowder is, at the same time, exploded and not exploded.
In agreement with that derisive point of view, Schrödinger came up with the cat paradox.
Both paradoxes have long been resolved by pointing out that objects as complex as barrels and cats are macroscopic.
Quantum mechanics applies on the microscopic scale and, to some degree on the mesoscopic.
Experimental physicists are trying to understand precisely where the delineation of scale is.
Meanwhile one-off thought experiments like this 9ne are plentiful.
... of that is not true.
We have a racist, self-admitted pussy-grabbing right wing batshit crazy evangelical Christian intolerant ass hat at the pinnacle of power and he's Teflon coated.
So, start over.
If you RTFA, the whole story is that IoT is shipping without protection.
I don't manufacture the shit I buy.
I don't use VPN, I have never used VPN, and I don't plan to use VPN.
It's not up to you to plan my business case regarding cameras and the need to remotely monitor stuff.
I recommend a separate private network and SSH and a VPN.
Who's going to pay you to implement that?
No one.
The burden of protection is not on the consumer side. None of us wants a goddam fucking hobby.
We want to plug-and-play and get on with our lives.
What we will do is avoid the porous packet pitiful product with our pocketbook.
You can't think of a single reason to look at a remote camera on your phone?
The Internet (that's the place we are at right now and stuff) provides us with remote access to video footage.
The teacher asked her students to tell a story about their weekend.
Little Johnny said, "Well, I yelled at my dog to get off the tracks, but he just played there and the train ran right over his ass.
Quietly, the teacher asked, "Don't you mean "rectum?"
Johnny shouted , "Wrecked 'em, hell, it almost killed 'em!"
Never needed any more than what people exposed to the public.
Thanks.
No need.
I have a library of books on the matter.
Thanks.
They located mass that was uncounted for.
String theory is actually "String hypothesis," because it can't predict a goddam thing and there are no experiments that can be used to test it.
Same thing for loop quantum gravity. It's just a loopy mod of string theory.
The mass is baryonic by definition and part of the standard model. It is also part of the quantum theory model for reasons of "mass."
Uranus is not pronounced that way.
It's " Your an us."
Well, with that attitude, you'll never get custody of the kids.
.. of the states vs the feds.
The current administration is taking advantage of a 1917 treaty and "because national security." to write executive orders that favour the wrong side of America.
States are countering with "states rights."
For reference, look at marijuana, vehicle emission/mpg limits, immigration, gun control, etc.
States can launch all the satellites they can afford and use tactics like that to circumvent a batshit cray cray executive and a non-performing congress.
In all three cases, whether state, executive or legislative, the People are speaking.