Most of our technologies aren't that efficient - anything running on electricity is typically 70% waste heat.
Good electric motors produce less than 10% waste heat, and that little bit of waste heat is probably beneficial in a cold environment to keep things running smoothly.
You still need energy to heat up the CO2. And if the energy is available in electric form, which is most likely, why not simply drive an electric motor instead ?
In the past year, two tablets in my household have died because the micro-USB ports which serve as their power connectors had ceased to work - presumably due to wear.
Yeah, I had to fix my tablet's micro-USB port twice. One of the pins had to be resoldered to the board. These micro USB connectors are way too delicate for daily use.
So we should allow people to get professional assistance on how to take their own life in a peaceful way. That way there's a graceful way out for those who have really considered the issue well. At the same time, reduce access to easy suicide on a whim.
If you lock every single door in your house, including your bedroom door, the risk of dying in a house fire because you can't get out quickly enough probably outweighs the benefit of the extra protection.
The trend is still as robust as it was. And before you complain that I'm linking to a wordpress blog, you can download the data here, and draw your own graph: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gist...
The flexing of the tires is helping to make the ride more comfortable. If you harvest energy from that, they'll get stiffer, and you'll feel more bumps and vibrations. People don't want that. Otherwise, they could have stiffer and more energy efficient tires already.
My point exactly. You haven't explained anything, and you've stopped trying.
The atheist's position that "it must be, because we reject any alternative explanation" is not science
I reject any explanation that requires unexplainable and untestable magic. I'm not aware of any reasonable alternative explanations that don't require magic.
Evolutionists want to claim their theory is "settled science". It's not. It's not even a testable theory
It's perfectly testable in lots of different ways. Maybe you're thinking of abiogenesis ?
Except that this doesn't mean regular people should be learning R. Rather, the business should hire somebody's who already has a background in data analysis/statistics, and probably also already a knowledge of R (or at least can pick it up quicker).
Slashdot Mirror
A miror is easier to produce than a solar pannel.
Build a bunch of mirrors and concentrate the sunlight on a solar panel.
The question is if the costs of harvesting and transporting the dry ice are sufficiently low to enable this as a viable solution.
The killer will be the huge investments to set up the transporting infrastructure. You need energy first.
Most of our technologies aren't that efficient - anything running on electricity is typically 70% waste heat.
Good electric motors produce less than 10% waste heat, and that little bit of waste heat is probably beneficial in a cold environment to keep things running smoothly.
I think the idea is that you can take a small amount of heat energy and turn it into a larger amount of electrical or mechanical energy
There's still a law of conservation of energy, even on cold Mars.
I think it would be easier to set up a bunch of solar panels at the middle latitudes. Or go nuclear.
You still need energy to heat up the CO2. And if the energy is available in electric form, which is most likely, why not simply drive an electric motor instead ?
In the past year, two tablets in my household have died because the micro-USB ports which serve as their power connectors had ceased to work - presumably due to wear.
Yeah, I had to fix my tablet's micro-USB port twice. One of the pins had to be resoldered to the board. These micro USB connectors are way too delicate for daily use.
That's what people said just before the .com crash
Most USB connectors have auto-reverse. It only works properly if you don't manually reverse at the same time.
So we should allow people to get professional assistance on how to take their own life in a peaceful way. That way there's a graceful way out for those who have really considered the issue well. At the same time, reduce access to easy suicide on a whim.
If you lock every single door in your house, including your bedroom door, the risk of dying in a house fire because you can't get out quickly enough probably outweighs the benefit of the extra protection.
It's climate change caused by global warming. Both expressions highlight different aspects of the issue, but both are equally valid.
Also, both terms were already in use long before it became a well known public issue.
http://www.skepticalscience.co...
No significant average temperature change in 15 years
Look at the trend, and don't stare too much at the 2-sigma outlier in 1998.
https://tamino.wordpress.com/2...
The trend is still as robust as it was. And before you complain that I'm linking to a wordpress blog, you can download the data here, and draw your own graph: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gist...
Bad graph. Explained here:
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/201...
The amount of skin pigmentation (among many other things) is determined by genetics.
how many white races are there
That depends on how closely you look. The differences are small.
You're confusing race with genetics. The two are not related in any way. Race is a human construct.
Race is a human construct based on small differences in genetics.
You know what'll stop backward hicks like ISIS? Technical and social advance
Keep dreaming. People who are eager to destroy 6000 year old artefacts aren't interested in your technical and social advance.
Would have been nice if TFS had included an explanation of what the TSYNC feature is.
The flexing of the tires is helping to make the ride more comfortable. If you harvest energy from that, they'll get stiffer, and you'll feel more bumps and vibrations. People don't want that. Otherwise, they could have stiffer and more energy efficient tires already.
I'll be happy to distribute some of my resources, but only in return for something of equal value.
I don't have to explain anything
My point exactly. You haven't explained anything, and you've stopped trying.
The atheist's position that "it must be, because we reject any alternative explanation" is not science
I reject any explanation that requires unexplainable and untestable magic. I'm not aware of any reasonable alternative explanations that don't require magic.
Evolutionists want to claim their theory is "settled science". It's not. It's not even a testable theory
It's perfectly testable in lots of different ways. Maybe you're thinking of abiogenesis ?
Africa, hunger could be dealt with even without food supplies from outside, if all the fertile soil could be used
Africa's biggest problem is not a distribution problem. It's the Africans.
Same thing. You haven't explained the creator itself. You haven't explained the creation process. You can't predict anything.
I agree it's simple, but it's also meaningless. You have no answers. The only thing you've accomplished is that you've stopped asking questions.
Except that this doesn't mean regular people should be learning R. Rather, the business should hire somebody's who already has a background in data analysis/statistics, and probably also already a knowledge of R (or at least can pick it up quicker).
Yo momma lives in all 5.