At least one of the two users will have to have an open port allowing inbound connections for continuous contact. Good luck with that unless you're willing to pay extra to your ISP to allow a home server.
You have to have some way of locating the other device if you're going to use the remote user control feature. Can't do that without a common meeting point - a server.
If the US and NATO are going air-to-air against Russia in Eastern Europe (the most likely scenario), Russia wins within 3 days, and the US and NATO know it.
They don't need to identify it immediately. Knowing something is there, they can direct much more powerful radar at that spot to help determine what it is. I think it's there in the article, but it's definitely being used in conjunction with "normal" radar by the Russians.
Also, since they're cheap to make, it's easy to deploy decoys to make you waste your anti-radiation missiles. Plus firing them give a pretty good clue as to where you are. They're either carried internally, in which case your stealth isn't so stealthy when you open the doors to fire, or externally, in which case you're not exactly stealth to begin with. And in the eastern European theatre, Russia has the advantage of closeness. All this is why Rand Corporation, in their assessment, said that Russia could overrun NATO defenses in 3 days max. Stealth is useless if the other side has already won.
"In modern parlance?" No country uses cruise missiles that can't guide themselves, they all navigate on their own. No need for someone in the loop to guide them, unlike, say, a drone (even though those will become autonomous as well).
Obama said at least 5 times that the use of chemical weapons by Syria was a red line. Why not say that Syria was an internal affair? In retrospect, since many of the rebels were al Qaeda, arming the rebels against the Syrian regime wasn't exactly a smart move. This has been inevitable since George W Bush and co. invaded Iraq on the pretext of weapons of mass destruction, evidence that Colin Powell knew was bogus before he spoke at the UN.
Obviously you do - you not only read the story, but you also commented on it. Most people who attack trans-people are latent homosexuals. As Fred Flintstone said, you go have yourself a gay old time. You'll feel better out of the closet. Yabba-daba-doo!
A Leavenworth judge disagrees with you. Her legal name has been Chelsea Elizabeth Manning since 2014. Do try to keep up. Does it bother you that much that someone else can take control of their life? This sort of thing has been going on since the early 20th century. Time to get over it, don't you think? Or did you think this was the Flat Earth Society Discussion Group / Luddite Support Forum?
Maybe it wasn't on the front page last time? I didn't see it. Then again, I don't compulsively check every hour on the hour, so I could have missed it, same as others.
Well, then maybe if it upsets you so much you should have reported it a month ago instead of bitching and moaning like you've got a dildo up your arse:-)
It's not laziness. There's no way that you want to have to walk customers through the process - and imagine if their isp blocks inbound http requests? I'd say they're pretty much cock-blocked.
Yes, you are missing something. The app doesn't have a built in server, so it needs to use a remote server, same as every other app out there. You can't just "connect the two smartphones together" over the internet.
Why? Because they're dildos. And someone told them that this was "Phone Sex 3.0". (Phone Sex 2.0 was back when people had vibrating pagers and would put them in *ahem* certain places and page themselves (or each other, or whatever).
Babies put anything they can get their hands on into their mouth. Adults, on the other hand...
It's only a matter of degree, and depending on the protocol used that allows the other person to control it over the internet, there's probably going to be server logs, same as any other internet thingee that involves communication between 2 parties via a server.
Check your web server log files. Date, time, your ip address, the url you accessed, and all the data in a GET request, they're all in there. If they're using a simple http GET, this is all normal.
This is a good way to keep someone from using it and then trying to return it as "unused." You really don't want to accept returns in such cases, or get an "unused" one..
After all, you don't know everywhere it's been, but your imagination can do a pretty good job of coming up with gross scenarios.
Invading an ally is sufficient cause to ignore a treaty with the invader. That's the message to send - stop the shit or we'll both pay for it in the long run. Is it is, the US failed to back up an ally. That did more damage than violating a treaty. Putin is laughing.
Cruise missiles don't have to be guided - they guide themselves, using terrain matching, gps, and known landmarks. Nobody piloting them by remote control.
Mutually Assured Destruction avoided all-out war between east and west. It's the only thing proven to work. Each country's population is hostage. We're back at that point today, given the current situation vis-a-vis the US, Russia, and China. The failure of the US to act when Russia annexed the Crimea, (even one cruise nuke on Russian soil would have sent the message) means that there's no reason for Russia or China to believe the US will be able to protect NATO allies. As it stands, Russia can annex Eastern Europe in 3 days. China would use that distraction to take over much of the territory to the south, and possibly expand into northern central Asia, figuring that Russia would be too preoccupied with the east, and they need the land anyway.
Cruise missiles don't have to be guided. And when was the last time we had a war directly between two major powers?
The Russians showed just how effective a cruise missile campaign can be in Syria. The Russian KH-101 stealth cruise missile (max range 5,500 km / 3,400 miles, with a rumored maximum of up to 10,000 km, nuclear variant KH-102) wasn't hampered by range constraints. The Chinese also have them. You don't need an F35 for countries like Syria, and they will be shot down on approach in wars with China and Russia, so what's the point of having the F35 again? Especially since the combat radius is only 600 miles (you can't use the ferry range, since that is one-way). An F35 taking off from Germany wouldn't even get to St. Petersburg before having to turn back, and Moscow isn't possible even as a one-way mission.
Slashdot Mirror
Way to miss the point. The topic we are both replying to is "Re: You Mispelled (sic) "Bradley Manning""
Chelsea Manning has taken control of that aspect of her life. Otherwise her legal name would still be Bradley Manning.
Obama might even give it a metal (sic).
Manning is not an "it." That's the ultimate "objectification" of her.
At least one of the two users will have to have an open port allowing inbound connections for continuous contact. Good luck with that unless you're willing to pay extra to your ISP to allow a home server.
Who says it's not encrypted? Nobody has bought one and monitored the traffic with Wireshark (or at least nobody who wants to admit they bought one).
You have to have some way of locating the other device if you're going to use the remote user control feature. Can't do that without a common meeting point - a server.
If the US and NATO are going air-to-air against Russia in Eastern Europe (the most likely scenario), Russia wins within 3 days, and the US and NATO know it.
They don't need to identify it immediately. Knowing something is there, they can direct much more powerful radar at that spot to help determine what it is. I think it's there in the article, but it's definitely being used in conjunction with "normal" radar by the Russians.
Also, since they're cheap to make, it's easy to deploy decoys to make you waste your anti-radiation missiles. Plus firing them give a pretty good clue as to where you are. They're either carried internally, in which case your stealth isn't so stealthy when you open the doors to fire, or externally, in which case you're not exactly stealth to begin with. And in the eastern European theatre, Russia has the advantage of closeness. All this is why Rand Corporation, in their assessment, said that Russia could overrun NATO defenses in 3 days max. Stealth is useless if the other side has already won.
"In modern parlance?" No country uses cruise missiles that can't guide themselves, they all navigate on their own. No need for someone in the loop to guide them, unlike, say, a drone (even though those will become autonomous as well).
Obama said at least 5 times that the use of chemical weapons by Syria was a red line. Why not say that Syria was an internal affair? In retrospect, since many of the rebels were al Qaeda, arming the rebels against the Syrian regime wasn't exactly a smart move. This has been inevitable since George W Bush and co. invaded Iraq on the pretext of weapons of mass destruction, evidence that Colin Powell knew was bogus before he spoke at the UN.
Obviously you do - you not only read the story, but you also commented on it. Most people who attack trans-people are latent homosexuals. As Fred Flintstone said, you go have yourself a gay old time. You'll feel better out of the closet. Yabba-daba-doo!
It doesn't work that way, Scooter. Otherwise, there'd be more trans hockey, football and soccer players. not to mention priests.
A Leavenworth judge disagrees with you. Her legal name has been Chelsea Elizabeth Manning since 2014. Do try to keep up. Does it bother you that much that someone else can take control of their life? This sort of thing has been going on since the early 20th century. Time to get over it, don't you think? Or did you think this was the Flat Earth Society Discussion Group / Luddite Support Forum?
Saw it in the firehose, no way to let them know that they were wrong :-(
Maybe it wasn't on the front page last time? I didn't see it. Then again, I don't compulsively check every hour on the hour, so I could have missed it, same as others.
Well, then maybe if it upsets you so much you should have reported it a month ago instead of bitching and moaning like you've got a dildo up your arse :-)
It's not laziness. There's no way that you want to have to walk customers through the process - and imagine if their isp blocks inbound http requests? I'd say they're pretty much cock-blocked.
Yes, you are missing something. The app doesn't have a built in server, so it needs to use a remote server, same as every other app out there. You can't just "connect the two smartphones together" over the internet.
Babies put anything they can get their hands on into their mouth. Adults, on the other hand ...
It's only a matter of degree, and depending on the protocol used that allows the other person to control it over the internet, there's probably going to be server logs, same as any other internet thingee that involves communication between 2 parties via a server.
Check your web server log files. Date, time, your ip address, the url you accessed, and all the data in a GET request, they're all in there. If they're using a simple http GET, this is all normal.
This is a good way to keep someone from using it and then trying to return it as "unused." You really don't want to accept returns in such cases, or get an "unused" one..
After all, you don't know everywhere it's been, but your imagination can do a pretty good job of coming up with gross scenarios.
Watch out if you have a Samsung printer - HP is buying Samsung's Printer Business for $1 Billion
A future driver update will probably screw you.
Invading an ally is sufficient cause to ignore a treaty with the invader. That's the message to send - stop the shit or we'll both pay for it in the long run. Is it is, the US failed to back up an ally. That did more damage than violating a treaty. Putin is laughing.
Cruise missiles don't have to be guided - they guide themselves, using terrain matching, gps, and known landmarks. Nobody piloting them by remote control.
And modern stealth doesn't work against WW2 radar, so what's your point?
Mutually Assured Destruction avoided all-out war between east and west. It's the only thing proven to work. Each country's population is hostage. We're back at that point today, given the current situation vis-a-vis the US, Russia, and China. The failure of the US to act when Russia annexed the Crimea, (even one cruise nuke on Russian soil would have sent the message) means that there's no reason for Russia or China to believe the US will be able to protect NATO allies. As it stands, Russia can annex Eastern Europe in 3 days. China would use that distraction to take over much of the territory to the south, and possibly expand into northern central Asia, figuring that Russia would be too preoccupied with the east, and they need the land anyway.
Cruise missiles don't have to be guided. And when was the last time we had a war directly between two major powers?
The Russians showed just how effective a cruise missile campaign can be in Syria. The Russian KH-101 stealth cruise missile (max range 5,500 km / 3,400 miles, with a rumored maximum of up to 10,000 km, nuclear variant KH-102) wasn't hampered by range constraints. The Chinese also have them. You don't need an F35 for countries like Syria, and they will be shot down on approach in wars with China and Russia, so what's the point of having the F35 again? Especially since the combat radius is only 600 miles (you can't use the ferry range, since that is one-way). An F35 taking off from Germany wouldn't even get to St. Petersburg before having to turn back, and Moscow isn't possible even as a one-way mission.