Well, I knew a woman who had an abortion because the baby was going to be the wrong color, so her husband would have known she was cheating. People are strange.
So you're basically saying they should lie to their bosses by saying they have to release it anyway? Also, they don't need to take a special deduction, since they're already able to deduct the employee's wages and overhead.
People also see the results of jury trials on the news and the web. They're the ones that get more attention. A plea bargain is a one-day footnote in the news compared to a juicy trial that goes on for weeks.
The only jury that counts is the one in the country I'm living in. There's also the question (in Canada) as to whether the federal government can bind the provinces to such an agreement in areas where the provinces have jurisdiction. That's one of the good things about being a federation - it's like states rights on steroids.
I assume TIPP is a typo for TPP, and that you're not talking about something else. Out of 12 TPP countries, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and Singapore (that's 7 countries out of 12) do not have jury trials. That means less than half of TPP countries have juries. Definitely not most.
No, TTIP is NOT a typo. It's the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - a proposed trade agreement between the European Union and the United States. Last I looked, Europe didn't include all those countries you listed.
Many restaurants tack on all sorts of "fees" before they pay the staff the tips they earned. Some even keep the entire "service charge" for themselves.
Another restaurant chain in London, Gaucho, which serves steak dishes that cost up to £99, takes 16% of staff tips and puts part of this towards 'staff incentives and competitions'. It also takes a further 2.3% each month from sales generated by each waiter, which is shared among non-waiting staff.
A Gaucho employee told the Observer that in one month they earned close to £500 in tips but, because of a combination of the two deductions, more than £400 of that was retained by the company.
Last week a further tipping scandal came to light when the London Evening Standard reported that a French restaurant chain, Côte, retains the entire 12.5% service charge that it adds to customers’ bills rather than giving it to their staff.
Tipping in cash is a good way for the wait staff to remember you the next time that the manager wants them to push the fish, so they'll tell you "avoid the fish."
You'd be surprised. DNA evidence, for example, has never been peer reviewed, and the math is totally screwed up when it comes to people of the same ethnicity, and it requires subjective interpretation as to whether there's a match or not.
Defense lawyers are there to educate the jury on these problems. Then again, most jurors have a certain distrust of it to begin with.
Really? I still have all my parental rights. ALL. And the concept of physical gender doesn't change - otherwise there could be no conflict between physical gender and gender identity, so your argument not only is wrong, it starts out with a concept "destroying the concept of physical gender" that is seriously at odds with reality.
And what the hell (if anything) does same-sex marriage have to do with this? It's an individual decision, not something that requires a partner (of either sex). Two completely different topics. A sex change doesn't affect parental rights and obligations.
And what does taking a plea bargain have to do with jury nullification? Nothing. And if all the accused always exercised their rights to a jury trial, the court system would collapse under the burden. Prosecutors in many cases are pushing plea bargains because there simply isn't the budget to try everyone, and they know it.
There's a hell of a difference between static linking (the code is included in the final binary) and what we refer to dynamic linking, which is code we can optionally load into memory, executed, and then dumped, mix, lather, repeat. That same code can also be loaded by other programs, so it certainly is not part of the first one to load it.
But then again, what do you expect from a couple of lawyers?
Don't forget, they also consider php scripts that call each other as "linking", even though there is absolutely no linking stage - just an interpreter loading data. They truly are masters of the over-reach.
Remember what Stallman said about Jobs - ""I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone." Let that be Stallman's epitaph.
They would then have to prove that the license is violated of code shipped in the same ISO is a "combined work", which it obviously isn't, since they are separate files. They are no more a combined work than having a can of motor oil and an oil filter both sitting in the same box are a combined work.
No, neither the FSF nor Stallman have standing to sue. They do not hold ownership of either the kernal or zfs. They would be laughed out of court if they tried.
The only part of their blog post you should adhere to is "Do Not Rely On This Document As Legal Advice". Everything else is political posturing.
The Software Freedom Conservancy doesn't have standing, and if they tried, Oracle would probably kill them good!
Remember, morons like these want to include scripts that have NO linking at any stage as being "linked" when they call each other.
Dynamically loading and executing code in a separate module is not linking, even though we unfortunately refer to it as "dynamic linking." The code in a module is separate from the caller, written by others, and since either can be distributed without the other, they are obviously not "linked" - especially since you can change whether any module is loaded or not at run time if you so choose to include the necessary code. Including them in the same distro is no different than including gplv2 and bsd code in the same distro.
The kernel and zfs are are distributed in the same way that a can of beans and and apple are a "combined distribution" when you leave the grocery store. They're still separate entities, and a worm in the apple does not affect the beans in any way whatsoever - not even legally. To say that they need to be distributed separately is total bullsh*t.
By the same token, since the two are separate, even on an ISO of a distro (oh look - they are indeed separate files), they do not form either a derivative or combined work. The two works are still independent of each other.
The Software Freedom Conservancy is doing a great job of showing how freetards think.
TD Bank, basic chequing account, $3.95 a month, if you have a $1,500 balance the fee is waived. 4 cheques and 10 debit / atm transactions included at no extra charge (or no charge w. the $1,500 balance). If you need more transactions, just carry around cash - it's still accepted pretty much everywhere.
I'd say go one step forward: tatoo a barcode on everyone's forhead AND a chip inside the head.
Forget the ATMs, think of the posibilities: easy tracking, no more anonimity in public, oh, the options are unlimited.
No more muggins as it's quite hard to carry 2-3 severed head with you.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't "convert" someone to become a lesbian. Or straight, for that matter. Sexual attraction is fixed before birth.
Well, I knew a woman who had an abortion because the baby was going to be the wrong color, so her husband would have known she was cheating. People are strange.
There are SEVEN BILLION of us already here, and we are adding TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND more people, EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!!!!
ENOUGH!
I think I have identified the problem :-)
Never heard of a vasectomy, have you? If you don't want to father kids, then it's your responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen, not hers.
Third-wave feminism is pretty much dead nowadays, and 4th wave is having a very hard time figuring who they should hate.
So you're basically saying they should lie to their bosses by saying they have to release it anyway? Also, they don't need to take a special deduction, since they're already able to deduct the employee's wages and overhead.
People also see the results of jury trials on the news and the web. They're the ones that get more attention. A plea bargain is a one-day footnote in the news compared to a juicy trial that goes on for weeks.
The only jury that counts is the one in the country I'm living in. There's also the question (in Canada) as to whether the federal government can bind the provinces to such an agreement in areas where the provinces have jurisdiction. That's one of the good things about being a federation - it's like states rights on steroids.
I assume TIPP is a typo for TPP, and that you're not talking about something else. Out of 12 TPP countries, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and Singapore (that's 7 countries out of 12) do not have jury trials. That means less than half of TPP countries have juries. Definitely not most.
No, TTIP is NOT a typo. It's the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - a proposed trade agreement between the European Union and the United States. Last I looked, Europe didn't include all those countries you listed.
Babies sleep better in bed with their parents. It's now called co-sleeping or some other weird name.
That would just give them more of an excuse to add to the "contents may settle during shipping" for all those half-full boxes of cereal.
Another restaurant chain in London, Gaucho, which serves steak dishes that cost up to £99, takes 16% of staff tips and puts part of this towards 'staff incentives and competitions'. It also takes a further 2.3% each month from sales generated by each waiter, which is shared among non-waiting staff.
A Gaucho employee told the Observer that in one month they earned close to £500 in tips but, because of a combination of the two deductions, more than £400 of that was retained by the company.
Last week a further tipping scandal came to light when the London Evening Standard reported that a French restaurant chain, Côte, retains the entire 12.5% service charge that it adds to customers’ bills rather than giving it to their staff .
Tipping in cash is a good way for the wait staff to remember you the next time that the manager wants them to push the fish, so they'll tell you "avoid the fish."
You'd be surprised. DNA evidence, for example, has never been peer reviewed, and the math is totally screwed up when it comes to people of the same ethnicity, and it requires subjective interpretation as to whether there's a match or not.
Defense lawyers are there to educate the jury on these problems. Then again, most jurors have a certain distrust of it to begin with.
Really? I still have all my parental rights. ALL. And the concept of physical gender doesn't change - otherwise there could be no conflict between physical gender and gender identity, so your argument not only is wrong, it starts out with a concept "destroying the concept of physical gender" that is seriously at odds with reality.
And what the hell (if anything) does same-sex marriage have to do with this? It's an individual decision, not something that requires a partner (of either sex). Two completely different topics. A sex change doesn't affect parental rights and obligations.
And what does taking a plea bargain have to do with jury nullification? Nothing. And if all the accused always exercised their rights to a jury trial, the court system would collapse under the burden. Prosecutors in many cases are pushing plea bargains because there simply isn't the budget to try everyone, and they know it.
There's a hell of a difference between static linking (the code is included in the final binary) and what we refer to dynamic linking, which is code we can optionally load into memory, executed, and then dumped, mix, lather, repeat. That same code can also be loaded by other programs, so it certainly is not part of the first one to load it.
But then again, what do you expect from a couple of lawyers?
mkdir /home/sermon /dev/sdb1 /home/sermon
mount
Of course they're trolling - it's good for donations.
Remember what Stallman said about Jobs - ""I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone." Let that be Stallman's epitaph.
(automotive analogy) :-)
No, neither the FSF nor Stallman have standing to sue. They do not hold ownership of either the kernal or zfs. They would be laughed out of court if they tried.
The only part of their blog post you should adhere to is "Do Not Rely On This Document As Legal Advice". Everything else is political posturing.
The Software Freedom Conservancy doesn't have standing, and if they tried, Oracle would probably kill them good!
Remember, morons like these want to include scripts that have NO linking at any stage as being "linked" when they call each other.
Dynamically loading and executing code in a separate module is not linking, even though we unfortunately refer to it as "dynamic linking." The code in a module is separate from the caller, written by others, and since either can be distributed without the other, they are obviously not "linked" - especially since you can change whether any module is loaded or not at run time if you so choose to include the necessary code. Including them in the same distro is no different than including gplv2 and bsd code in the same distro.
The kernel and zfs are are distributed in the same way that a can of beans and and apple are a "combined distribution" when you leave the grocery store. They're still separate entities, and a worm in the apple does not affect the beans in any way whatsoever - not even legally. To say that they need to be distributed separately is total bullsh*t.
By the same token, since the two are separate, even on an ISO of a distro (oh look - they are indeed separate files), they do not form either a derivative or combined work. The two works are still independent of each other.
The Software Freedom Conservancy is doing a great job of showing how freetards think.
TD Bank, basic chequing account, $3.95 a month, if you have a $1,500 balance the fee is waived. 4 cheques and 10 debit / atm transactions included at no extra charge (or no charge w. the $1,500 balance). If you need more transactions, just carry around cash - it's still accepted pretty much everywhere.
So you're in a large store and you don't have reception - no purchase for YOU!
I'd say go one step forward: tatoo a barcode on everyone's forhead AND a chip inside the head. Forget the ATMs, think of the posibilities: easy tracking, no more anonimity in public, oh, the options are unlimited. No more muggins as it's quite hard to carry 2-3 severed head with you.
Joe Pesci would like a word with you. "Only 3? What a piker. Try 8."