Perhaps most concerning, however, is the fact that this means those stiff penalties apply even when there is no harm or threat of harm to the copyright owner caused by the infringement.
Nor can you petition a jury for jury nullification. Its automatic mistrial.
Do you really believe that out of 12 jurors, there won't be ONE who is aware of jury nullification? Come on, you can't all be that dumb. (looks at republican race)... On second thought...
It's pretty common knowledge what the penalties are for various crimes, such as 1st and 2nd degree murder, etc - anyone who reads the news will know this, with all the shootings going on.
A jury can be presented with several different possible verdicts, each with a different penalty, and pick the one they want - so in effect, the jury does decide to a great part what the penalty shall be.
And all this (the arguments you threw up) are irrelevant to my point - juries know that it's a criminal trial; they know that there's the possibility of jail time. So as I said, good luck finding someone to send someone to jail when there's been no harm.
Buy a reasonable smartphone phone, pay it up front so you don't get on the "subsidized treadmill", and a cheap pay-as-you-go plan, and you will find your monthly bill dropping by between half and 3/4. It's not like they have to be replaced at 2 years + 1 day.
If you can afford to pay $20,000 or more for a place on a leaky boat (most of the refugees paid people smugglers and bribes), you can afford 30 pounds of food.
If you're in good health, have a supply of water treatment pills, and follow a stream (or pond hop) you can walk a month dragging along 30 pounds total supplies.
Education doesn't make people less corrupt. To the contrary, it just provides more opportunities for corrupt people to do more harm. Didn't you learn anything from the various financial crisis?
I guess you're still not up to speed - being trans is no longer considered a mental disorder. It's also probably going to be removed completely from version 6 of the DSM for that reason.
And I call bullshit. Many people transition but stay in the same field, because that's what they know. If you looked at the bottom of the article, you would have seen one such instance where the f2m was more respected after transition by those who were not in the know, and compared the "two of them."
Male-to-female transsexuals often look like dudes in a dress.
Really? I rented out my spare bedroom twice to guys last year, for 4 months at a time. Neither one knew until the last month, when I told them, The first one stayed in denial for a week. We're everywhere, and you often can't tell.
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, prior art. Also, you should have applied for a trade mark, not copyright.
We're talking about the possibility of criminal penalties, you know, jail time ...
Perhaps most concerning, however, is the fact that this means those stiff penalties apply even when there is no harm or threat of harm to the copyright owner caused by the infringement.
Now how hard was that?
You can't send someone to prison without a trial. Not even for a traffic ticket.
Nor can you petition a jury for jury nullification. Its automatic mistrial.
Do you really believe that out of 12 jurors, there won't be ONE who is aware of jury nullification? Come on, you can't all be that dumb. (looks at republican race) ... On second thought ...
It's pretty common knowledge what the penalties are for various crimes, such as 1st and 2nd degree murder, etc - anyone who reads the news will know this, with all the shootings going on.
A jury can be presented with several different possible verdicts, each with a different penalty, and pick the one they want - so in effect, the jury does decide to a great part what the penalty shall be.
And all this (the arguments you threw up) are irrelevant to my point - juries know that it's a criminal trial; they know that there's the possibility of jail time. So as I said, good luck finding someone to send someone to jail when there's been no harm.
Good luck finding a jury that will send someone to jail when no harm has been done. Now everyone, please bone up on jury nullification.
You mean like 3D TV? Another over-hyped niche product?
People who are able to pay smugglers between $20,000 and $80,000, plus various bribes, are hardly "3rd-world poor."
What is your problem? I never said it was the solution. Just that it's possible to do.
Buy a reasonable smartphone phone, pay it up front so you don't get on the "subsidized treadmill", and a cheap pay-as-you-go plan, and you will find your monthly bill dropping by between half and 3/4. It's not like they have to be replaced at 2 years + 1 day.
If you can afford to pay $20,000 or more for a place on a leaky boat (most of the refugees paid people smugglers and bribes), you can afford 30 pounds of food.
They dont have money to go to the moon but they have money to fund war
You sure you're talking only about Russia now?
Doesn't need any money. He will build a free university on Mars for all black and brown people. And it'll be free.
You've got it all wrong. Donald Trump is going to build a rocket to Mars. And he's going to make the Martians pay for it!
40 billion reals is only $10 billion, or about $50 per person.
If you're in good health, have a supply of water treatment pills, and follow a stream (or pond hop) you can walk a month dragging along 30 pounds total supplies.
Education doesn't make people less corrupt. To the contrary, it just provides more opportunities for corrupt people to do more harm. Didn't you learn anything from the various financial crisis?
I guess you're still not up to speed - being trans is no longer considered a mental disorder. It's also probably going to be removed completely from version 6 of the DSM for that reason.
It's a buyers market, and women are the buyers. We're the ones who say yes or no.
And I call bullshit. Many people transition but stay in the same field, because that's what they know. If you looked at the bottom of the article, you would have seen one such instance where the f2m was more respected after transition by those who were not in the know, and compared the "two of them."
and if a transexual (sic) has sex with a man without telling them, the tranny should be charged with rape.
Why? They're willingly having sex with someone who is legally a woman.
Liar.
First, it's "cite", not "site". Learn simple spelling before you criticize someone - it ruins any credibility an AC might have had.
Male-to-female transsexuals often look like dudes in a dress.
Really? I rented out my spare bedroom twice to guys last year, for 4 months at a time. Neither one knew until the last month, when I told them, The first one stayed in denial for a week. We're everywhere, and you often can't tell.
All things adjusted for, women do earn less.