Slashdot Mirror


Rio Has Given Up On Clean Water For Olympics (go.com)

iONiUM writes: When bidding to host the 2016 Summer Olympics, Rio de Jaineiro promised the International Olympics Committee that it would eliminate 80 percent of the sewage found in the city's notoriously filthy water, and would fully regenerate the lagoon in which rowing and kayaking events will be held. Now a few months from the start of the games, Rio has given up on keeping those promises. According to an article from Deadspin, "The U.S. will send 48 rowers to Rio, and they will be as forewarned and forearmed as the federation can make them, starting with squeeze bottles of hand sanitizer that will be distributed on the flight to Brazil. Hannafin says the athletes have been asked to get hepatitis A vaccinations and polio boosters and take the oral typhoid vaccine. Their oar handles will be bleached and their boats washed inside and out after each training session or competition. Gear will be laundered at a high enough temperature to kill microbes."

400 comments

  1. Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kayaking in shit. Brazil. The land of the poor and stupid.

    1. Re:Brazil by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No need to be stupid to have unsanitary runoff in the lagoon, just poor.

      If you're poor enough, you can't even leave.

    2. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You'll get modded down but sir, you tell it like it is.

    3. Re:Brazil by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kayaking in shit. Brazil. The land of the poor and stupid.

      Poor, yes. Stupid, no. The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

      The stupidity is on the part of the IOC who actually thought that Brazil could achieve that monumental feat without any real change in the situation in Brazil.

    4. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Throw in Zika virus and microcephalic offspring (lots pregnancies result from the Olympics) and this is just one big shit-fest

    5. Re:Brazil by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The stupidity is on the part of the IOC "

      No, they got their kickbacks I assure you. So the only people who lose are the athletes.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Brazil by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stupid, no. The got the Olympics

      Getting the Olympics is a winning proposition less than 50% of the time. It costs more to put on the olympics than the revenues from them. It only financially works if the facilities are used after the Olympics are over, which means that the facilities have to be built well enough to stand for decades, which means that they cost even more to build. There are lot more Sarajevos than there are Lake Placids.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The athletes have a choice and get paid.

      The only people who lose are the people of Brazil, save the few already rich and powerful who will make money from it.

    8. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The stupidity is on the part of the IOC "

      No, they got their kickbacks I assure you. So the only people who lose are the athletes.

      The IOC should get that money...laundered (at a high enough temperature to kill microbes).

      YEAAAAHHHH!!!

    9. Re:Brazil by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tourists will be staying away from this Olympics in droves, so it is virtually guaranteed to be the biggest money loser in Olympic history. I suspect a few athletes may decide not to show up as well, to protect their own health. If the IOC wasn't so corrupt, they'd move the Olympics to an emergency backup location, say one of the many cities that have hosted in the past and still have the facilities (e.g. Los Angeles).

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What choice? The choice to make less money than they would doing nearly anything else? Or do you mean it's fine to throw one more thing on the backs of these athletes because there's nobody with an actual gun to their heads forcing them to compete? If I had to work in sewage, the only way to get me to do it would actually be to put a gun to my head.

      http://www.stack.com/a/olympic-rower-salary

    11. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English. Do you speak it?

    12. Re:Brazil by laie_techie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stupid, no. The got the Olympics

      Getting the Olympics is a winning proposition less than 50% of the time. It costs more to put on the olympics than the revenues from them. It only financially works if the facilities are used after the Olympics are over, which means that the facilities have to be built well enough to stand for decades, which means that they cost even more to build. There are lot more Sarajevos than there are Lake Placids.

      If you want to look at a money-making Olympics, look to the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics, which made 101 million dollars despite additional costs for security after 9/11.

    13. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the olympics, cough, has been a farce for decades. Fuck the olympics. Dont mean squat.

    14. Re:Brazil by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

      Did they? Between the corruption and the stupid overbuilding of the Olympic site that you'll never make your money back from, the Olympics are looking more and more like a booby prize with every four-year cycle.

    15. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It costs more to put in on than you get if you are actually spending money on the venues. Brazil is obviously not bothering with that. So they'll prolly make plenty of money unless the rest of the world decides to take the games back to China. I bet they could out an awesome olympics together in six months by refurbishing the 2008 venue...

    16. Re:Brazil by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ironically the only two locations in the US to host the Winter Olympics are part of the few places to have ever gotten a return on the games. Salt Lake Cities facilities are used by Team USA for training and are available to the public otherwise and make more than enough to pay for continued operation with enough return left over to pay the construction bonds where they were required.

      Though it seems it's easier to make money on the Winter Olympics than it is the summer Olympics as the last place to ever make money on the Summer Olympics was Los Angeles.

    17. Re:Brazil by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      There was no return on Salt Lake. Stop floating that lie.

    18. Re:Brazil by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So the only people who lose are the athletes.

      Don't forget the people of Brazil. Hosting the Olympics has pretty much become an open scam with only rich politicians, big construction companies, and the IOC profiting from it. Just look at Beijing and Sochi for more examples.

      Boston got smart after a lot of pushback against their hosting bid. I can only hope that the rest of the US continues that trend. If the US never hosts the Olympics again it would still be too soon.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    19. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      People seem to think that Brazil is a small village. It is a monster 9,000,000 km2 country. There are lots of bad things and lots of good things. The southern states are more livable than most of the US [Oh, by the way, how's Flint doing? Baltimore? Porter Ranch?]. There is no blanket statement to be made of Brazil. Do it and your stupidity will shine.

      Life can be [and in my case it is] extremely enjoyable down here. Go educate yourselves [no, no offense taken; I will still welcome you in Brazil by August]

    20. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 1984 Los Angeles Olympics was the model for Salt Lake City. That was the first year the Olympics turned a profit and they did it by using existing facilities as much as possible and corporate sponsorships. No public money was used, it was entirely privately financed and turned a profit of $250M.

    21. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The land of the poor and stupid." would also describe large swathes of the USA -Flint anyone?

    22. Re:Brazil by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the Olympic Stadium from the London 2012 olympics is being converted to a football stadium at a cost if around £300million and rented out to a top flight football club on a 99 year lease that pays less in rent than the conversion costs, let alone the original construction costs.

      Pathetic.

      Add to that the bullshit about specifically taxing businesses around the area (with the rationale being "they will benefit from the olympics in a few years, so they should pay more in tax now") and then banning those businesses from referring to the olympics in any way at all in advertising etc. Yes, these taxes included businesses whose revenue was not based on footfall traffic, so businesses such as design agencies or web agencies got hit as well for utterly no benefit.

    23. Re:Brazil by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Considering that the last Olympics; the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics, has bedeviled by its own lack of preparations, I'd say the IOC doesn't really care. All that counts is that the IOC gets the money, hookers and blow that they have come to expect, all that counts is how much of these three things can be made available by the contesting cities.

      Even the moderately successful Vancouver winter Olympics had the various snow events over an hour a way from any of the other venues, after driving down one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in Western North America.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    24. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As much as it pains me to say (I'm a Brazilian), it's not a matter of being poor.

      It's just about being stupid. We have had a lot of news about corruption right now and some imbeciles equate corruption with the current leadership. No doubt they are part of the problem, but Rio de Janeiro, for instance has been polluted for decades.

      Crime has been somewhat tackled in recent years (probably because of the World Football/Soccer Cup), but results are mediocre, to be frank.

      Instead of solving the problems, Politicians are opportunists and want to profit from every failure.

      If one looks at a sufficient long time period -- say 20 years -- , it can be seen that things improved. But it all happens at snail pace.

      Other people fixed their problems: Japan, Korea, Germany... we could have done it, too. But we get lost in Political bickering, we fail at bringing education to the masses and now we must face a lot of shame when inviting everyone to a party here.

      Maybe we need to go through all this, maybe it's karma, I don't know... it's not like other countries don't have also their share of problems.

      But it's quite a shame, indeed...

    25. Re:Brazil by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I think you're going to start seeing more major Western cities giving a big fat no to bidding on the Olympics, which is going to mean more Sochis and Rios are going to be expected. The IOC is joining FIFA in the unbelievable host city contests. Equally, they should be joining FIFA in prison cells.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    26. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The New York Times thinks it did. Do you have a source that says it didn't, or are you just making shit up?

    27. Re:Brazil by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the IOC wasn't corrupt, there should be one location for the Summer Olympics (it should be in Greece, where the ancient Olympics are held), and the Winter Olympics should be held in another location, one that is guaranteed to have snow. Throw a few hundred billion at each location; major airports, venues, hospitals, living facilities, and then it's just the cost of maintenance. No more shopping around for kickbacks for the winning society, and no more need for the IOC in its current form.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    28. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/sports/salt-lake-profit-tops-forecast.html

    29. Re:Brazil by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      When you consider the size of the investment and the total revenues, I but that is shitty ROI as compared to what else could have been done with that money.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    30. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the IOC wasn't corrupt, I'd still be watching the olympics every 4 years.

    31. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olympic athletes are amateurs, by definition. Which isn't too say they aren't the best at what they do, but if they're making big salaries (e.g. professional basketball) than they're ineligible.

      Olympic athletes get stipends and other income, but it's not any kind of career. They do it for the love of the sport.

    32. Re:Brazil by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Poor, yes. Stupid, no. The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

      Considering the Olympics long history of causing its host cities to hemorrhage money, I would be to differ.

      Being an Olympic (of FIFA championship, for that matter) host city is great if you've got money to burn and just want the prestige. But for poorer countries/cities it's usually a losing proposition. You end up with a huge debt at the end and a bunch of facilities that can't be used for anything else.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    33. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why NBA players don't play in the Olympics.

      Oh wait.

    34. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Stop floating your turd.

    35. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or NHL.

      Not so ironically, hockey is the only Olympic event that is even remotely interesting.

    36. Re:Brazil by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But the money for the olympics is largely given by the host government, and ends up mostly in the hands of private companies.

    37. Re: Brazil by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 2

      The 1992 US men's basketball team, aka the "Dream Team", says hi.

    38. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you even know anything about the USA personally? It sounds like your information all comes from TV. Hey, if all I knew of Brazil came from the media, I too would assume it was all one giant favela filled with dark women with even more giant asses. Oh, wait, maybe that's from all my "Internet" exposure... Why is this hair growing on my palms?

    39. Re:Brazil by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Sepp Blatter could use some company in the prison cell he fully deserves, but will likely never see. The smell of corruption and rot emanating from FIFA's upper management exceeds even that of the water in Rio, or the stench of greed from the Olympic committee.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The 2018 & 2022 World Cup bids have been so dogged with rumors of bribery and corruption that several committee members have been removed already.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    40. Re:Brazil by kelarius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anonymous Cowards, posting stupid and racist bullshit shit since 1997. Poor != stupid, and considering the challenges they likely faced in clearing all of the waste from their water, and since Brazil isn't really know for wealth, I'm not surprised they couldn't do it while spending the billions necessary to build up the rest of the facilities that will undoubtedly go to waste after the Olympics are over.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    41. Re:Brazil by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 1

      Kayaking in shit. NYC East River. The land of the rich and merciless.

    42. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those Salt Lake Olympics are not the top profit, but they are recent. This means it is possible to host an Olympic event successfully and profitably in recent years instead of just the ancient past of 1984 in Los Angeles, or Seoul in 1988.

      As for the better use argument, it always depends on what you think is important. It was only a 8.4% net profit, and I cannot find information on how much of that investment became persistent infrastructure improvements, but $1.2 billion of various costs and it was fully paid off in 2002 (as added fun, it came in 40% under budget).

      No citations in the above, because I pulled everything from that same link to the citation aggregator that late_techie posted.

    43. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I would support a permanent relocation of the summer Olympics to Greece. Hell, they could even host the winter Olympics. Much better than letting the sleezy IOC and its corporate friends rip off Greek culture every couple of years just to sell TV ads.

    44. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should the athletes be supported? What special debt does society owe an athlete that they should get special treatment?

      The Olympics have long since jumped the shark and has become a terrible financial burden to the host city. Any politician that advocates for hosting the Olympics should be removed from office and government employees should be fired.

    45. Re: Brazil by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Almost every Olympic sport has it's own rules for who can and can't be a competitor; and many of those allow a professional to compete.

      The amateur qualification for rowing can be (and likely is) very different from the amateur qualification for track and field.

    46. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say Boston outsmarted everyone when it gave up its Olympic bid.

    47. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tourists will be staying away from this Olympics in droves, so it is virtually guaranteed to be the biggest money loser in Olympic history. I suspect a few athletes may decide not to show up as well, to protect their own health. If the IOC wasn't so corrupt, they'd move the Olympics to an emergency backup location, say one of the many cities that have hosted in the past and still have the facilities (e.g. Los Angeles).

      Last I heard: LA has good clean water, but only about 4 gallons of the stuff left.

    48. Re:Brazil by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      If the IOC wasn't so corrupt

      then it wouldn't be the IOC?

      Remember the IOC only lanes in London?

    49. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://kuer.org/post/utahs-olympic-legacy-impact-2002-winter-games-how-games-affected-utahs-economy

      The various leftover venues are losing money at an accelerated pace with no end in sight.

      http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/do-olympic-host-cities-ever-win/

      Local business did poorly:

      "For example, while Salt Lake City’s hotels and restaurants were packed during the 2002 Winter Games, other businesses not directly related the event, like department stores, suffered significant losses in sales. Overall, economic activity the region actually fell during the Olympics."

      There is no point making $101 million dollars if you harm local business to do it. I can make $101 million that way this year as well. 100% tax rate on business. Then they all leave and I'm left with a money loser of a town. But I get to keep $101 million dollars and claim I'm a great guy.

    50. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the Zika virus. I thought the American dream was to have 2.5 kids.

    51. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Projecting, much? Out of curiosity, what school of writing says that repeating yourself is an effecting way to annoy your readers, er, I mean, emphasize your point?

    52. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an interesting definition of supported. The example in the parent linked article is $800/month- less than a woman would get on public assistance in the US, and certainly less than she would in most of Western Europe.

    53. Re:Brazil by MightyMartian · · Score: 3

      Let's be clear here. The modern Olympic Movement has about as much to do with the Ancient Olympics as Wicca has to do with the pagan Celtic religion.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    54. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the one that needs to stop trolling and accept the truth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    55. Re: Brazil by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Pro athletes being barred from the Olympics hasn't been a thing for many years, and the early requirement for amateur status is alleged to have kept the competition among the wealthy (or at least those sponsored by the wealthy), as the poor couldn't afford the time off of work to train, especially when the modern Olympics began and work days and weeks were very long.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    56. Re:Brazil by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yep because the Olympics worked out so well for Athens last time...

    57. Re:Brazil by citylivin · · Score: 2

      "after driving down one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in Western North America."

      Do you mean the sea to sky highway? If so you don't know what you are talking about. They completely rebuilt it for the olympics and it is one of the true success stories of that winter games. Its a dream to drive on now compared to the 2 lane monstrosity that predated it. Trust me, I drove on both. Much improved. You hardly ever hear of anyone having head on crashes or driving over the side anymore, whereas that used to be a monthly thing.

      You may want to bash the olympics and that's fine there is a lot to bash, but the sea to sky highway and the canada line expansion to the airport are two of the olympic legacy items that pretty much every lower mainlander can appreciate now. The olympic oval in richmond I have also heard is quite nice, although I haven't been there myself.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    58. Re:Brazil by AaronW · · Score: 1

      All they did is bribe the right people. The IOC is a corrupt joke.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    59. Re:Brazil by OhPlz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Boston got smart, but not necessarily because of what has happened to other Olympic hosts, although that's part of it. The outrageous overruns and fraud that was part of the Big Dig tunnel project is still fresh in everyone's minds, and almost no one was held accountable for any of it. They're still having to make major repairs on tunnels that are still practically brand new.

      Then on top of that the subway and commuter rail system has been an absolute disaster since last winter. If they can't get mass transit to work for the workforce, you could imagine what would happen with the Olympics in town.

      On top of all that, the former Democrat Governor Deval Patrick was given a very well paid role in preparing the Olympic bid for the US and he hired a bunch of his cronies for big money. I think that was the final nail in the coffin. Governor Cadillac Deval started off on the wrong foot as governor by making some very questionable expenditures for his office and vehicle at a time when the economy was hurting.

    60. Re:Brazil by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Yea, but was that because of the Olympics or were retailers suffering a slump regardless of the Olympics? If people are buying stuff off of Amazon instead of going to the mall and the Olympics happens to be in town, that doesn't mean the Olympics is what caused the mall to lose money.

    61. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're an American, you've been brainwashed into thinking that if you're not a billionaire, it's your own fault for being lazy and stupid and not wanting success enough. If you're poor, just increase the amount you want to be rich and you'll stop being poor. Also, watch that Shia Le Beef motivational video. It'll make you successful and less poor because you'll just do it.

    62. Re:Brazil by SNRatio · · Score: 1

      Just because there is a loss overall doesn't mean that there aren't plenty of winners. A project can fail utterly while making the principals involved rich (so long as they wrote the contracts correctly)

    63. Re:Brazil by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      Nice selective reading/quoting. You forgot to mention "tourism spending has gone up 2 billion dollars in the 10 years since the Olympics". Compared to that, the $4.5M annual deficit of the venues is chump change. If needed they could just levy a small tax on every non-resident ski lift ticket sold and cover that easily. But they don't have to, because there's an endowment which is still funding them (though it will run out eventually).

      And while the ski resort owners would undoubtedly complain about the tax, they'd know that it was a good deal, because the olympics gave their business a huge boost.

    64. Re:Brazil by guises · · Score: 1

      This would counter the point of the Olympics. The Olympics are supposed to be a means to encourage international unity, they are not about one country throwing a party every four years. They're are not even really about watching a bunch of athletes compete. Like the World's Fair, the Olympics moves between countries for this reason. And, for this reason, the Olympics needs to be hosted by poorer countries now and then. It couldn't do its job if it were just a rich people party.

      That said, there are countries poorer than Brazil which could probably have handled this better.

    65. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those factors might have had a part in generating opposition, but the big problem was that the plan for hosting the Olympics was an absolute joke. An actual literal joke. The original plan called for shooting sports to be held in Billerica - add your own punchline, there are plenty to choose from if you've ever lived in Billerica. The plan was so bad that they had to significantly rework it just to get any consideration, and even then they couldn't sell the people on the costs, additional traffic, and potential destruction of parkland to use for sporting arenas. Not even corrupt politicians wanted to sign off on something so hated by the people. When does that ever happen? We can get over the Big Dig, but there's no way in hell that we'll ever consent to having the entire region screwed over just to host some overblown sports party.

    66. Re:Brazil by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Ironically the only two locations in the US to host the Winter Olympics...

      Three cities in the US have hosted winter olympics: Lake Placid, NY (twice), Squaw Valley, CA, and SLC, UT.

      Though it seems it's easier to make money on the Winter Olympics than it is the summer Olympics as the last place to ever make money on the Summer Olympics was Los Angeles.

      LA allegedly made a profit both times (1932, 1984), though documentation for the 1932 profit is sparse.

    67. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If that's it's purpose, then it has failed. Scrap the Olympics, don't bother holding them any more.

    68. Re:Brazil by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they should have spent those billions on infrastructure instead of a money-losing cesspool like the olympics.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    69. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor, yes. Stupid, no. The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

      You misspelled "out-bribed"

    70. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize Brazil has almost 8 times the murder rate of America, right?

      Whatever stupid fucking point you thought you made... You didn't.

    71. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Basically anywhere that is more than 30% black...

    72. Re:Brazil by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      No thanks. Zika virus isn't confined to the olympic site.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    73. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government debt:
      US: 103% of GDP, or $58,255 per capita.
      Brazil: 15% of GDP, or $1,608 per capita.

      You guys are like the fat family on Poor Street who brag about their flat screen TV and other luxury stuff all of which was bought on credit cards and loan shark loans.

      Your country won't be what it is much longer. You can't afford to buy much more nice stuff. Heck, you can't even maintain the infrastructure that all that debt bought you.

      Don't worry, Brazil will send you food when you run out of places to borrow from and realize that cheap consumer goods are inedible.

    74. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is just expressing his observation. No need to go el dicko supremo.

    75. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey this *is* Slashdot: wall to wall Walters.

    76. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London only got its sewerage system (in the 1850's) after the Great Stink, caused by using the Thames as an open sewer, affected those in the Houses of Parliament. Mind you, at the time, London was probably the richest city on earth, though Brazil as a country isn't poor.

    77. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a huge waste of money, even apart from the bribes, don't like the special laws and have no interest in sport but I went for the day when it was in town and thought it was a fantastic spectacle.

    78. Re:Brazil by dafradu · · Score: 1

      Baltimore... and New Orleans, Detroit, St Louis, Pittsburgh, Memphis, Atlanta.. just to name a few of US cities with a higher murder rate than Rio...

    79. Re:Brazil by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Much of the security costs of SLC 2002 were picked up by the Military. Due to 9/11 being only a few months beforehand the Military deployed significant assets within the state. I'll personally never forget the 3 fully armed Apache Attack helicopters that basically hovered above Rice stadium during the entire opening ceremonies. Nor will I forget the military deploying military radars, missile batteries and other assets all over the hillsides surrounding the venues or the Humvee's and light armor with .50 machine guns that were deployed at the entrances to some of the venues or even the fully armed national guard members that paroled many of the venues, athlete villages and party areas.

      Had the American Olympic committee had to pay those security expenses directly it would likely have bankrupted the games. But coming within 6 months of 9/11 attacks the deployment of those military assets made everyone at the games feel safer at least it did for me.

    80. Re:Brazil by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      If the IOC wasn't corrupt, there should be one location for the Summer Olympics (it should be in Greece, where the ancient Olympics are held), and the Winter Olympics should be held in another location, one that is guaranteed to have snow. Throw a few hundred billion at each location; major airports, venues, hospitals, living facilities, and then it's just the cost of maintenance. No more shopping around for kickbacks for the winning society, and no more need for the IOC in its current form.

      Do you think Greece with their major economic problem can afford to host the Summer Games every four years? The short answer is NO!

    81. Re: Brazil by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Olympic athletes are amateurs, by definition.

      Uh, no, they aren't. Professional athletes have been allowed in the Olympics for well over twenty years.

    82. Re:Brazil by NormalVisual · · Score: 0

      I can't speak as to Brazil in general, since I've never been there. However I've personally seen hundreds of Brazilian families spend thousands and thousands of dollars at Disney World on quinceañera vacations/parties for their daughters. There many not be many, but at least a few people there have a pretty good chunk of cash.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    83. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a'merikan

    84. Re: Brazil by guises · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to suggest that the continued existence of conflict means that every effort at peace has been for nothing... That's just dumb. The Olympics isn't "the solution" to violence, but it is a non-violent thing that the whole world pays attention to for a couple of weeks. It forces us, in a small way, to acknowledge the existence of people in the world who are not like us, and to recognize that we are not the best at everything. That's to our benefit.

      China also worked its butt off to at least appear cooperative enough to get the Olympics. That's something. It's a step.

    85. Re: Brazil by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      Calgary also made a sizable profit and the endowment used to mainain the facilities is still growing almost 30 years later. Pretty much every venue is still in use with the possible exception of the ski jumps.

    86. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't always that way. Let's not revise history.
      http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/22/opinion/greene-olympics-amateurs/

    87. Re: Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He he, nice one, I lived in Billerica for six months and while I agree, it's a total shit hole, it wasn't *that* bad. I've known many worse places around the world.

      It's also on the Lowell commuting line, so provided the train service can be maintained it wouldn't be that hard to get to.

      They could even host the boxing in Lowell :)

      The first time I walked into the Lowell DMV I almost did a 180 and give up! It was the nost crazy ass place I've ever been to, kind of like a stereotypical police station with hookers and gangstas loungjng about.

      Lol, good times!

    88. Re:Brazil by koiduadoi · · Score: 1

      Addmefast Imacros script 2016 - Working 100% Hello everyone, I just find a lot of addmefast imacros on google but mostly don't work. So i decided to fix some code. Here the result. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... It's working good for me. I hope it works good for you too.

    89. Re:Brazil by Aereus · · Score: 1

      The other thing to take away is they could be hosted for far less if stupidly extravagant accommodations and facilities weren't required. Sure, there is some cruft involved when you have to make stuff like artificial kayak runs etc. but I'm sure they could be more frugal. Especially with the winter olympics, since most of those events involve little in the way of extra facilities other than the bobsled track. Lillehammer I think it was, even still had the speedskating events held at an outdoor track. How Sochi cost $50B is anyones guess.

    90. Re:Brazil by Aereus · · Score: 1

      As an addendum to this, I did some research and the 1976 Winter games were projected to cost Denver $35million dollars, which adjusted for inflation is about $200M USD. So yeah, one could say the costs have risen just a little bit. And I believe the 2004 games in Athens were around $12-15B and the summer olympics has way more going on.

    91. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they should have spent those billions on infrastructure instead of a money-losing cesspool like the olympics.

      No.
      They should have been investing in educating the brazilians on doing the right thing. Even if they spend billions on real infrastructure, it would be expensive, cheap quality material and services. Besides that, the construction time will go waay beyond planned and, when the real deadline is in, LOTS of money will be thrown to complete it.
      There will also be lots of structural problems that will be VERY expensive to fix or they will have to demolish the damn thing and do it all over again.
      Corruption is not only acceptable, it is the norm. Not only the "elite" people are corrupt here. Most people brag themselves and are even encouraged to be the smartass guy and no the sucker one!(esperto/malandro vs otário).
      Example, if you find a phone on a street and you keep it to you then you're lucky!(esperto!) The one who lost it is the one who shouldn't have lost it in the first place!(otário).
      Hence the saying "Found is not stolen"(Achado não é roubado).
      And every other little corrupt things that are in no way acceptable in other countries.
      Brazil is corrupt because of its people being corrupt albeit not "knowing" it, because it is part of the culture.
      Only by changing this view it can change for the better faster.

    92. Re:Brazil by guises · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Sochi was so expensive thanks to massive corruption, rather than from any requirements of the games themselves. Or accommodations, etc. I think that's a big part of what's going on in Rio as well, London apparently cost about $15 billion.

      I'm sure there's more to it than that though, there seems to be a lot of variability.

    93. Re:Brazil by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The costs are often because they confiscate large amounts of private land to make the facilities. It should be a rule that any new facility to host the olympics must be made from previously public land, not displacing a single person or business. You can't even make it voluntary, as there are different standards to that as well. Everyone displaced in China for Beijing olympics went willingly. Though the implied alternative was death, so the level of voluntary is debatable, hence why it shouldn't be allowed.

      Instead, the games are used as an excuse to displace the greatest number of people possible. China used the olympics as an excuse to clear slums around Tienan Men Square (older 2-story barracks holding families, that didn't have running water, and only barely electricity). There were better places to put things, but it was an excuse to bulldoze unwanted neighborhoods without public outcry.

    94. Re:Brazil by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The IOC claims that the games are a net benefit to the hosting country, so can Greece afford not to host them?

    95. Re:Brazil by sursurrus · · Score: 1

      >> Poor, yes. Stupid, no. The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

      Nah, hosting the games has a negative ROI. It took Japan decades to pay off the debt. Beijing's facilities have rotted and were never used much. Every go around the IOC puts out fuzzy math that makes it seem like the olympics is beneficial and every go around fewer democracies are interested in hosting it. We're pretty much down to dictatorships after 2016.

      The Brazilian river of shit adds irony, but it's the Brazilians who'll be paying off the loans through 2026.

    96. Re:Brazil by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Education doesn't make people less corrupt. To the contrary, it just provides more opportunities for corrupt people to do more harm. Didn't you learn anything from the various financial crisis?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    97. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should for starters have spent billions on infrastructure instead of 40 billion per year of free money for families that do not work in a clear scam to manipulat the election and keep the rulling party in power.

    98. Re:Brazil by Sir+Foxx · · Score: 1

      I don't see how any athlete would show up for this. For what? Risk your health for something that has become so corrupt and so opposite of the ideals of what the whole was created for? Fuck that. Plenty of other competitions to go show your skill. Anyone willing to risk getting in that water for this, will get no sympathy from me(like that means anything anyway) when the bill comes due down the line with their health. AFAIC, they better have paid up on some good health insurance because I don't want to see them asking for assistance later, when they knew the risks going in ahead of time.

      --
      "I don't which is worse, that everyone has a price, or that the price is always so low"--Hobbes
    99. Re:Brazil by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      40 billion reals is only $10 billion, or about $50 per person.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    100. Re:Brazil by guises · · Score: 1

      Eh... You're probably right, but I don't like the idea of the erosion of public land either. Those stadiums, etc., which they build on the public land are not dedicated to public use, they're usually taken over by private companies. Mostly professional sports teams, though I think the water dome in Beijing got turned into a water park.

    101. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually not converting yet... after the world athletics (track and field) championships are held there in 2017. And we'll see if the conversion is actually done.

    102. Re:Brazil by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Which is a Republican lie. Rmoney, the manlike object that hates us, ruled that Olympics so you just know all of the numbers surrounding it are lies. He is Moron, err Mormon, and they hate the truth. Hate the truth.

      Ad hominem upon ad hominem. How clever to switch a couple letters to turn "Romney" to "Rmoney". However, Republicans believe in spending their own money, while it's Socialists (such as Obama) who spend others' money, so "Rmoney" (our money) doesn't quite fit. Then you ad hominem Romney calling him a manlike object, followed by saying that all Republicans "hate us" (who is us anyways? those who are quick to spend others' money?). You are not the first try to be funny by omitting a letter from "Mormon" to create "Moron". As for Mormons hating the truth, that's patently false. Mormons believe that "the glory of God is intelligence" and that all truth comes from God.

      Can you give a single verifiable case of the numbers being fudged in the SLC Olympics? We keep such good records that it was in that Olympic that the scandal over the Olympic Committee requiring bribes was brought to light (those bribes were included in reports on the cost of the games).

  2. I wouldn't want to row by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not in those conditions, it sounds like there are going to be a lot of athletes that end up getting diseases from the water by just being in it. Imagine if one cuts or scrapes themself?

    1. Re:I wouldn't want to row by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      America could always put on his big girl panties and have the tits to say no, and not go.

      But instead, fuck it, no consequences for anyone but the guys on the very bottom of the food chain... The rowers get fucked, everyone else makes a fortune.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one --> oneself

    3. Re:I wouldn't want to row by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      The rowers can certainly make their own decisions. I suspect if they have the determination and drive to train for years to become the top athletes in the sport, they'll get their shots and go.

    4. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they "...say no, and not go" then the rowers get fucked that way too.

      Do you have a plan that doesn't fuck the athletes?

    5. Re:I wouldn't want to row by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      This disease infested Olympics brought to you by Coca Cola, McDonald's, and other fine companies who don't give a crap if the Olympians have to compete in crap.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:I wouldn't want to row by MitchDev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say I'm going to boycott the Olympics, but to be honest, I ignore them every time they're held...

    7. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they didn't touch the water, they will be breathing in the water vapor with a exquisite selection of delicious viruses.

    8. Re:I wouldn't want to row by kaan · · Score: 2

      I get yout point, I wouldn't want to be a part of that scene either, but for most (all?) of these athletes, this is their livelihood, their passion, their years-long focus. Putting myself in their shoes, to say I might get sick is probably not what I want to hear but I bet I'd still participate.

    9. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they "...say no, and not go" then the rowers get fucked that way too.

      Do you have a plan that doesn't fuck the athletes?

      Nobody is going to answer this question because it is the truth.

    10. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Nunya666 · · Score: 0

      America could always put on his big girl panties and have the tits to say no, and not go.

      Like most things in life, it's not that black-and-white. It is a political nightmare to cancel the Games. Why? Because they only happen once every 4 years, and there is a limited time window for when an athlete can compete at the world-class level. For some athletes, cancelling the Games means they lose the chance of a lifetime. If they were to go, and win, they could be financially set for life because of endorsements. Losing that opportunity should be an individual's choice, not the government's choice.

    11. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply getting a mouthful of water from a splashing oar or wave is more than enough to transmit these diseases

    12. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start our own Olympics with blackjack and Hookers... hmm. This is going to be harder than I thought.

    13. Re:I wouldn't want to row by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      What about the open-water swimmers?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:I wouldn't want to row by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      According to TFA they appear to be royaly fucked.

    15. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, it's also brought to you by the IOC, because you can't spell corruption without I, O and C.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    16. Re:I wouldn't want to row by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So I'm an athlete. I train hard for a decade or more. 10 hours a day. 6 days a week.

      I get one shot every 4 years. Depending on my sport, i may get just 2 shots, sometimes Im lucky enough to be in a sport that i may get 3, 4 shots at the Olympics.

      And you're saying that giving up one of my 2 shots in a lifetime is an easy choice, just snap my fingers. More important to give a middle finger and give up my dream and make that sacrifice almost useless.

      This is why athletes go. This is why team management lets the athletes go. Yeah, it's the IOC, but dealing with the IOC is a requirement to be in the Olympics. Necessary evil.

    17. Re:I wouldn't want to row by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Glad someone put down what I was thinking.

      "Not going" is simply not a choice for people who have dreamt and worked their whole lives to be in the Olympics.

      All of the blame here is on the IOC. Sochi should have never happened... and neither should Brazil.

    18. Re:I wouldn't want to row by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Not going is certainly a choice. If enough countries said "we're not going to compete in sewage" the events would be moved elsewhere.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re:I wouldn't want to row by dafradu · · Score: 1

      The problem is the bay and lagoon where sailing and rowing will be taking place, not the open waters or beaches, they are MUCH cleaner.

    20. Re:I wouldn't want to row by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The problem is the bay and lagoon where sailing and rowing will be taking place, not the open waters or beaches, they are MUCH cleaner.

      Wrong. Notable in the report: nearly 70 percent of Rioâ(TM)s sewage goes untreated, being dumped or running off into waterways like Copacabana, where the open water swims are scheduled to take place in just 2 and a half years And there are plenty of similar links. They are not going to test the water for viruses. What does that tell you?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    21. Re:I wouldn't want to row by dafradu · · Score: 1

      It is still much cleaner, the marine outfall takes the water miles into the ocean.
      Its been raining heavily this week and most beaches are safe: http://www.inea.rj.gov.br/cs/g...

      Check the article yourself:
      Luiz Lima, a two-time Brazilian Olympic swim team member, trains off Copacabana daily with a club called the Gladiatores and says he feels perfectly safe. "The problem is the trash," he says, standing near the water's edge. "People in Brazil don't put trash in the trash."

      Steven Munatones, longtime international open-water event organizer and founder of the World Open Water Swimming Association, has made several prior trips to Rio and says the water quality -- judged by taste, smell, visibility and his own lack of symptoms afterward -- is usually very good. Out of roughly 60 times he's swum at Copacabana, he can recall only one day when conditions were, as he says, "gross."

      This gross days are usually the day after heavy rains, trash around the city ends up on the coast and depending on winds and currents end up on the beaches.

    22. Re:I wouldn't want to row by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      A few anecdotes are not the same as data.

      I don't know how they can claim the water is OK, when they are not testing it.

      Other people haven't been as lucky as the people you quoted. Even the best quotes you could find are hardly ringing endorsements. One day of "gross" water out of 60 means that the water is probably dangerous most, if not all of the other days. E.coli can be dangerous at much lower levels than someone could detect it through the taste of the water.

      Wake up. You live in a shithole.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    23. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A sacrifice for what? You do realize how trope level evil the IOC is right? You do know the crimes against humanity they have committed right? Look, I'm sorry you wasted your life on an idealistic dream, but the reality is that your dream is at the cost of real tangible lives, the economies of those people's nations, and the fact that decent people have to keep reading about these atrocities every time a host country gets the Olympics, the same goes for the World Cup.

      You need to accept the fact that you are choosing to ignore all the horrible crimes and evil they have spread across the world because you "want your shot". You say it's not an easy choice, I say it absolutely is if you're not a selfish ass who only cares about your "shot". You could just be a decent person, suck up your pride, accept what you are working for has been wrong, and boycott these slimebags. The fact is, what you consider hard work, is really just the sunk cost fallacy at work, because the alternative to not boycotting them, is throwing away what's left of your integrity, you now know with this example what the IOC is willing to do to its athletes, this is one in a million of far FAR worse examples of what they are willing to do for money, because they have ruined the lives of tens of thousands of people, maybe more over the years. Make your decision...

      captcha: dishonor

    24. Re:I wouldn't want to row by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would say I'm going to boycott the Olympics, but to be honest, I ignore them every time they're held...

      I would say I'm going to boycott the Olympic sponsors, but I don't buy their shit anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:I wouldn't want to row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you can't go to the next one(s) due to health reason because of going to this years?

    26. Re:I wouldn't want to row by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      I'd boycott them too, but I have no idea who they are...

  3. IOC is Corrupt by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember listening to an interview on Mike & Mike (ESPN radio) where they talked to some official try to explain away all of the problems with the Rio water supply and how athletes got sick in a rowing event in the water. The Rio water was fine, she explained and any problems would be rectified. Her doublespeak was so thick that only a complete moron couldn't hear that she was a grade "A" liar.

    The reality is the water is so dirty that you might as well swim in raw sewage. Does the Olympic Committee care? Nope. They got their bribes and they are happy.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:IOC is Corrupt by quenda · · Score: 4, Funny

      Athletes don't really swim in Rio. They just go through the motions.

    2. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IOC isn't even the only sport governing body that can challenge FIFA for the title of "Most Corrupt." Too many billions of dollars are at stake in every form of entertainment, so you have all the same problems in these organizations as the MPAA/RIAA/BREIN/etc of the world.

    3. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember listening to an interview on Mike & Mike (ESPN radio) where they talked to some official try to explain away all of the problems with the Rio water supply and how athletes got sick in a rowing event in the water. The Rio water was fine, she explained and any problems would be rectified. Her doublespeak was so thick that only a complete moron couldn't hear that she was a grade "A" liar.

      The reality is the water is so dirty that you might as well swim in raw sewage. Does the Olympic Committee care? Nope. They got their bribes and they are happy.

      One article I read said that Brazil actually plans to have boats patrolling during the events to pick up trash to try (emphasis on try) and make sure outcomes aren't affected. One bad time due to some trash could completely change who medals and could create some serious drama. Some competitors aren't even flying into Rio until right before their events to limit their exposure to the water and any potential health hazards. And have you seen pictures of the water? It pretty much is raw sewage. The people that accepted Rio's bid for the Olympics must have been hanging out with the same group that decided it would be a good idea to have the World Cup in the Middle East during the middle of summer.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had the displeasure of working on the software for an Olympics. I thought it would boost my career and no one really cared: we were basically an IBM showcase.

      Anyway, here's is my take on the Olympics:

      Marketing.

      People who sponsor it want to get their names in front of people's noses.

      Athletes train their whole lives for a "sport" (rhythmic gymnastics was called "orgasmic" gymnastics as a joke. And any "sport" that requires a panel of judges to give subjective scores is not a sport.) - let's start again...Athletes train their whole lives for a "sport" in the hopes of getting a Gold and earning gold from endorsements.

      The sports federations are a bunch of arrogant, entitled, aristocrats who care nothing of their sport but about their position. It's a real nicely paid job - being in charge of a sport; where a committee does the work.

      It's all about advertising boys!

      It's fun for the athletes though. It was this huge orgy. It was freshmen year on rocket fuel! Damn!

      No, those hot chicks only fucked the other athletes in the Olympic village.

      At least professional sports don't try to portray an illusion of a grander vision.

    5. Re:IOC is Corrupt by bobbied · · Score: 1

      You bet the Olympic Committee cares.... In so far as the media is covering it. Otherwise they would just be minding their own business, cashing the checks and arranging the kickbacks.

      Look, anybody who thought Rio was a good idea for the summer Olympics from a security and safety perspective has obviously never been there. It's not the worst situation I've seen down in South America, but it's pretty bad for a halfway civilized industrial country and not something you are going to be able to "clean up" enough put on something like the Summer Olympic Games without some serious costs and effort. Rio and the Olympic committee don't have enough money or time to do this right and we can only hope they manage to get close.

      All I can say is I'm glad I will be able to watch this with my family from my living room because I'd NEVER go to Rio with the family in the first place. It's way to dangerous unless you carefully stay at a hotel ON the beach, never stray inland more than a block or so and have arranged reliable transportation to/from the airport preferably with armed guards. The beach is beautiful although not always "family friendly", but the majority of the rest of the town is an open sewer both culturally and literally. Tourists who get off the beach do so at great risk and that goes double for you ugly American types who think loud English is more understandable than when it's whispered.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      So, tennis matches have ball boys, Rio Olympics rowing events will have floating turd scoopers? I can see how getting bogged down in raw sewage might effect the outcome of an event...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember listening to an interview on Mike & Mike (ESPN radio)

      Unfortunately, when you start a sentence with that, you let everyone know you are a moron who should be ignored.

    8. Re:IOC is Corrupt by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Offer her a glass or two of water from Rio to drink....

    9. Re:IOC is Corrupt by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Next Olympics in Iraq if the bribes are high enough

    10. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey: I AM an Ugly American, you insensitive clod!

      I said, I AM AN UGLY AMERICAN, YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!

    11. Re:IOC is Corrupt by msauve · · Score: 2

      SJW doesn't mean what you think it means.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:IOC is Corrupt by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      [...] the rest of the town is an open sewer both culturally and literally.

      You don't know Rio very well, do you? I'm from Brazil - not from Rio or nearby cities - don't even like Rio very much, but, the city is not even close to "an open sewer both culturally and literally": his "financial peak" belongs to the past, but even now it's pretty good at cultural activities...

    13. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are well-intended, but you are wrong. Not badder than the south side of Chicago.

    14. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Who hasn't been called an SJW, in this day and age?

    15. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Require the entire RIO side of the olympic committee to drink a cup of water taken from the middle of the basin on every day of competition.

    16. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offer her a glass or two of water from Rio to drink....

      Oh, the marvelous, sprinkling, naturally cooled water from the Sierras that surrounds Rio. I'd walk a mile for a cup.

    17. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans!!

    18. Re:IOC is Corrupt by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If the bribes were high enough, they'd be hosting it at Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:IOC is Corrupt by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Can you bribe the IOC to host the game somewhere else?

    20. Re:IOC is Corrupt by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Heart of the Sun? The IOC has to visit it first of course...

    21. Re:IOC is Corrupt by operagost · · Score: 1

      Our water is now only 20% sewage!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump?

    23. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I live a few hours drive from Chicago, and wouldn't drive into the South Side even if there was a skid of free Altair 8800 hardware to pick up for free.

    24. Re:IOC is Corrupt by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Or they can just wait a little bit and the sewage will congeal and they can just run / portage their kayaks.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    25. Re:IOC is Corrupt by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Or when they were in Brazil they drank the water, got bit by a mosquito, and caught the adult version of the zika virus.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    26. Re:IOC is Corrupt by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And the winner of each swimming event will have a big shit-eating grin on their face.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    27. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who aren't pussy concern trolls.

    28. Re:IOC is Corrupt by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      They're fucking cunts. They won't recognize squash as an olympic sport despite the fact that it's played by many millions around the world and has all the hallmarks of a great and exciting sport. Fuck the IOC.

    29. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Rio, most athletes walk on the water. It's the only way to reach the finish line, really.

    30. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant to write "They just go through the movements."

      Bowel movements.

    31. Re:IOC is Corrupt by quenda · · Score: 1

      Tomayto, tomarto. Potayto, partarto.

    32. Re: IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh ME!

      For some reason I only get called "shitlord" when I do that uncomfortably white & male thing and **notice** things I'm not supposed to, then do the UNTHINKABLE and speak up about them!

    33. Re:IOC is Corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tourists who get off the beach do so at great risk and that goes double for you ugly American types who think loud English is more understandable than when it's whispered.

      Random slam on Americans there...

      On a trip to Italy I overheard a French couple doing the exact same thing. From what I could gather, they were upset that the restaurant staff couldn't understand French, but insisted on speaking it slowly and loudly.

  4. If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olympics by michaelcole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's because they'll give you ****ing Hepatitus! If I knew water rights and environmentalists, I would pass this along to make a big issue for the whole Olympics. Disgusting.

  5. Making a statement... by lionchild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This might be the Olympic Year for countries, big and small, to make a statement to the IOC and the world. It's not just an issue for Rio, but other countries as well. And while it would suck for Olympic Athletes to skip this year, it would draw attention to an issue that even the US faces at home because of greed. Asking for clean drinking water isn't some special request that only the privileged should get, we need to consider it a human right.

    The Olympics will only be there for a year, the change that the Olympics can have might have a chance to linger way, way longer. So, just how much is a Gold Medal worth compared to generations of clean drinking water?

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    1. Re:Making a statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People seem to think having the olympics in their country will somehow make it better, earn them more money or whatever, But in fact it just costs the country a whole lot of money and it will have much less of it in the end.
      Its a scam like any other.

    2. Re:Making a statement... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      having the olympics in their country will somehow make it better

      Bringing great events to "undeveloped" countries is a oportunity for the administration of these countries to make basic constructions (like Airports and Sea ports) with the event "as an excuse", carrying development... I've seem something like it with the Word Cup (I'm a Brazilian guy, almost forget to mention :P)

    3. Re:Making a statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feelings of a few pampered athletes are immaterial in the larger scheme of things. In fact if the athletes were truly people who should be supported & admired as a measure of 'greatness of man & competition' they would all REFUSE to go. I'm not saying its not hard for someone who feels they have spent a considerable portion of their young life to try for the 'pinnacle' of their chosen skill to just give it up but if the Olympics is a representation of anything 'good' then it should be lead by the athletes who are supported by government handouts to simply say 'no, this is all just wrong'.

      Yes, I'm naive in thinking that would ever happen. So the next best thing is for the public simply not to go & not watch it...not hard for me as I haven't been interested in the Summer Olympics to any great extent for over 30 years...

    4. Re:Making a statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm a Brazilian guy, ...)

      And a bad one. You don't even understand what underdeveloped [which Brazil is not] country is. Putting your country to shame in the eyes of the world. Naughty boy. Please don't do it. Show them the good things we have [many good things].

    5. Re:Making a statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it may have worked with stadiums and swim, gymnastic and equestrian centers, but it apparently didn't work with drinking water.

    6. Re: Making a statement... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Easy man: it's have nothing to do with drinking water! (It's an anti-government media thing :P)

    7. Re:Making a statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only could countries make a valuable humanitarian statement by boycotting these Olympics but it would also help prevent host countries from giving unrealistic estimates of their abilities, which in turn would help stop the extreme corruption of the IOC. The Olympics is a total sham these days. The athletes are just pawns in games of graft where enormous sums of money are siphoned off the poor and given to the rich through contracts. I'm come to hate the Olympics.

    8. Re:Making a statement... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Part of that is already happening. The zika virus is going to keep plenty of people away. It will be a tourism bust.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. A new Olympic event? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    Shit Lagoon Rowing Competition! Who will get the gold!

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:A new Olympic event? by Frobnicator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shit Lagoon Rowing Competition! Who will get the gold!

      Who will get the brown?

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:A new Olympic event? by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Well sure, we're up Shit Creek... but at least we have paddles!" -- overheard at Olympic rowing event

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:A new Olympic event? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Who will get the clap?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:A new Olympic event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone deserves applause. That's the participation trophy. So is the clap.

    5. Re:A new Olympic event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit Lagoon Rowing Competition! Who will get the gold!

      Who will get the brown?

      Everybody.

    6. Re:A new Olympic event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We're all taking golden showers now"

    7. Re:A new Olympic event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The athletes are encouraged, when they bump into a shit in the water or if one gets in their mouth, to squirt a dab of hand sanitizer on it and gently rub until the shit is well covered.

  7. Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by TheSync · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Index of Economic Freedom says:

    "Brazil's limited experiment with market-oriented reforms has been uneven and even derailed in some areas. The state's presence in such sectors as energy, financial services, and electricity remains extensive. The legacy of decades of central planning, state meddling in economic activity continues even where it has demonstrably failed, and the weak rule of law further undermines economic progress."

    "Graft remains endemic, and Brazilians disapprove of President Dilma Rousseff's policies on corruption and crime. In 2014, a former director of state-owned Petrobas accused more than 40 politicians, including one minister and three governors, in a massive kickback investigation. Brazilâ(TM)s judiciary is inefficient and subject to political and economic influence. The court system is overburdened, and contract disputes can be lengthy and complex."

    1. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can comment on the endemic corruption in Brazil without linking to right wing thinktank drivel that tries to spin it as "big gubmint"

    2. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And here I thought Zika was going to be the biggest stink... They couldn't clean up ONE body of water over half a decade??

      Graft remains endemic

      Endemic can't be emphasized enough. Graft and corruption are culture-wide in Latin America, not just Brazil. Native Latinos - usually by no fault of their own initially - are programmed from birth to just expect graft and corruption in all facets of life.

      Corrupt police forces that oppress and/or extort. Militaries that become the tools of dictators to oppress. Illicit drug mafias and markets that corrupt politicians. The unnecessarily socialization of various markets (socialized initially to "protect the people" from dirty businessmen but ultimately become another tool of corruption.) The very public murders of any leader that tries to change the status quo...

      So where to people turn in dark times? Religion... But consider those countries' primary religious source: the Catholic Church. It has been a corrupt institution for millenia now, led by a clergy with a known history of gay priests, child molestors, bribe takers, (and in the not too distant past, torturers and murderers) - hypocrites of all colors and sizes.

      Why should anyone realistically expect any Latin American country to climb up out of its into the "First World" tier anytime soon, with all of that going against everyday citizens. They swim in spiritual/psychological shit everyday; Why would a little actual shit phase them?

    3. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by rahvin112 · · Score: 0

      Nothing like a quote from the Heritage Foundation. Might as well get a quote from ALEC or directly from the Koch brothers themselves.

    4. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      President Dilma Rousseff's policies on corruption and crime

      [Citation Needed] * knew she was an guerrilla member anti-dictatorship during 60's-70's? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (accusing it from this kind of corruption seems not very likely to be true to me, but a media construction...)

    5. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please never vote. Or procreate.

    6. Re: Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      She was tortured by the regime, man...

    7. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if this is satire or not. You're not only including but leading the write-up of corruption within the clergy with "gay priests"? Why is that kind of ignorance upvoted by mods?

      Grow up. There's a lot of great problems within this world, but somebody not being interested in the people you want them to be interested in is not a horrible badness within the world.

    8. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that source, the heritage foundation is an echo chamber spewing biased ideology not legitimate research.

    9. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confused, Heritage is not left wing at all. They are known very being highly conservative and right wing.

      It is scary that you consider them center-left/

    10. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole quote is accurate, however. In fact, it's understated.

    11. Re:Economic Fredom Index on Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the first 50% isn't fact but rather ideological BS.

  8. And this is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone surprised by this has never been to Rio.

  9. News For Nerds? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 0

    yaelk/Whipslash, I'm trying really hard not to complain here (because I know you've already gotten an earful), but I have to ask: what's the tech news angle on this? Why is this news for nerds?

    I agree it's interesting, but this isn't the kind of story I come to Slashdot for. Slashdot is all about the comments, and no one here is going to be able to say anything insightful about the situation. It's going to be a bunch of garbage posts from random commenters railing against Brazil or the IOC, with no technical insight to speak of. So I really don't get why this is Slashdot worthy.

    1. Re:News For Nerds? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree it's interesting,

      Well, there you have it! News for nerds means things nerds find interesintg. It doesn't mean nothing but kernel releases, cool hacks (we've not had nearly enough of these recently) and exploits.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:News For Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds like to be clean perhaps? Suggesting that possibly swimming in a river of shit is, not cool?

    3. Re:News For Nerds? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yaelk/Whipslash, I'm trying really hard not to complain here

      How difficult is it to not hit submit? How many of you are in there?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:News For Nerds? by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      I'll take some blame, I up voted it on the firehose. I found it to be an interesting story, and while I didn't give any thought to the comments it would engender, there have been some interesting notes about Rio's current economic state.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    5. Re:News For Nerds? by Nunya666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Then maybe you should unsubscribe.

      Or at least shut the f*ck up and stop whining.
      Or maybe just don't read the article because it's not interesting to you.
      Oh wait, you already said it's interesting.

      Do you have a brain?

    6. Re:News For Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear rsmith-mac, I'm trying hard not to complain here (because I know you've already gotten an earful), but I have to ask:
      Can you shut the fuck up?
      Some of us like to hear about this idiocy. I'm a nerd. This is news. I found it interesting.
      What more do you need?
      If you want a news feed personalized to your exacting specification of what news for nerd is and is not you should start your own website.
      It's not called news for computer science students.

    7. Re:News For Nerds? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Bio-hazards. Not just from environmental pollution, but now you can throw in the zika virus and how the olympics will be a major mode of transmission to other countries.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  10. Olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world's shining beacon of corruption. IOC must be smart enough not to run their money through US banks or else they'd be going to jail like the FIFA people.

  11. infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't we have the Olympics or the World Cup in a city that doesn't have to spend years and years building up its infrastructure? It doesn't do much for the economies of these countries, and the stadiums fall into disuse after the games anyway.

    1. Re:infrastructure by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Getting to host the Olympics is like a penis size contest: the biggest dicks always win!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  12. We're all third world men now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, for the love of God, would anyone want to hold the Olympics in a third world dung hole?

    1. Re:We're all third world men now by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "Ever since the Phoenicians invented money, there has only been one answer to that question." -- Clarence Darrow

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  13. Why do people in Brazil throw trash in the water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decent sanitation is a rudimentary characteristic of modern civilization. What is wrong with those people? The IOC are fools.

  14. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

    Indeed! If only i had mod points...

  15. Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by tekrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do third-world shitholes even bid for the Olympics then? All they are doing is highlighting what an embarassment their country is. It's crazy. Any why would a healthy, fit, above average jock want to risk his or her health or even life, by going to this shithole?

    I don't think USA Olympic athletes are covered by health insurance, because 'Murica. If they even have Obamacare, they are probably lucky. If you get a serious illness that could take years to eradicate, our athletes might be begging on the streets to make their doctor payments. And nobody is putting a sickly bronze-winner on the box of Wheaties.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by tekrat · · Score: 2

      The next Olympics should be held in Flint, Michigan.....
      It follows a familiar pattern.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    2. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embarassment?

      Do you think you actually did something to create the infrastructure in your non-embarassing country? (Are you like 150 years old or something?) Or are you just lucky enough to have been born somewhere that problem had already been solved for you.

    3. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad idea. That will provide more than enough federal funding to fix the problem there.

    4. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Rio is a shithole. There are some nice areas in Brazil, though, that would have been much better options.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      The costs of throwing the party are so out of control ($50B Russia? For 2 freaking weeks?!) that no country with politicians that are somewhat accountable wants to place a bid. That leaves a bunch of authoritarian regimes that want to "show the world how great we are" by slapping a quick coat of paint on everything and controlling press coverage for two weeks. The big cheese gets a feather in their cap and the IOC gets their bribes.

      The situation is coming to a head though. First with Russia that couldn't finish half the buildings in time for a winter olympics at a summer resort...even with $50B to spend... and now with this water situation and the thousands of migrant workers dying on the job to build world cup stadiums in Qatar. FIFA is in the process of cleaning house (hopefully) so maybe the IOC is next.

    6. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Why do third-world shitholes even bid for the Olympics then?

      because they *think* its a good way to boost international prestige if they can mostly pull it off and with it international investment.

      and while the host city is usually screwed the host country seems to benifit when its successful.

      All they are doing is highlighting what an embarassment their country is

      No quite the contrary. Usually there is enough wealth concentration and concentration of political power in third world shit holes, that the PTBs can make it happen and make a small corner of their yard look nice while the population suffers, and is displaced.

      Any why would a healthy, fit, above average jock want to risk his or her health or even life, by going to this shithole

      Because if you do win or do well you get a career as a celebrity spokes person, sports commentator, highly paid athletic trainer or consultant. You can probably live like a king after that. Even if you do run out of money or do something epically stupid down the road you can always get your genitals hacked off and put on a dress and start raking it in all over again.

      On the other hand if you spend all that time training and don't make it you lost out on a lot of time and made a poor investment. Nobody and I mean nobody will give a damn about the athletic career you had leaving to get a 9-to-5 like all us other slobs who now have a head start.

      I don't think USA Olympic athletes are covered by health insurance, because 'Murica

      I don't know why you would think that. Most of our athletes come from reasonably privileged middle class backgrounds or better. If you are trying to have a successful athletic career one of things you make sure to buy is medical insurance. Maybe some are not covered well, but I'd be surprised. Its an extraordinary claim you'll need some evidence.

      Frankly the Olympics are an embarrassing and socially destructive side show. The SJW crowd really should be outraged, but accepts it because they think its helping them accomplish their One World Government agenda I guess.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Why do third-world shitholes even bid for the Olympics then? All they are doing is highlighting what an embarassment their country is.

      There actually are reasons why this happens, but your remarks are very valid. Basically first world cities no longer wish to bid on the Olympics because they bleed money. The last Winter Olympics to turn a profit for the host were the 2002 ones in Salt Lake. The last Summer Olympics to turn a profit for the host city were the 1996 ones in Atlanta. If you are old enough to remember the 1996 Summer Olympics the IOC lost their crap over how "commercial" they were and made a point of not calling them the "best Olympics ever", something that had been done for years for the predecessor cities. But all the ones since then lost money. Some think Greece started spiraling down economically due to the 2000 Olympics. Sydney took it up the old poop shoot financially and I've heard wishes they had never hosted. Beijing and London lost a fortune but they don't care. Some cities feel that the prestige of hosting is worth the billions it costs.

      Brazil wanted to host the World Cup and Olympics to try to convince people that they are major players on the world stage, but nobody is actually surprised that they made grandiose promises they can't pull off. I think these Olympics are going to be a disaster. Yes, the Brazilians will be fine as hosts as far as person to person interactions go, but nobody should be shocked with all their incompetence and corruption that they can't get the water even close to being clean for the Olympics, despite having what I believe was the longest amount of prep time ever for a host city.

    8. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Why do third-world shitholes even bid for the Olympics then?

      Because all the smart countries have finally sussed up (after 30 years) that hosting the Olympics is a white elephant.


      Let's recap :
      2016 Rio - corrupt shithole with rampant poverty
      2014 Sochi - Russia is a corrupt shithole
      2012 London - OK, these next two I can't find much to fault them with...
      2010 Vancouver - horrific bigfoot pogrom (look it up on the internet)
      2008 Bejing - have you tasted their air? Also, a fine example of a repressive government, May 35th 1989, anyone? Oh, and corruption, or is that redundant here?
      2006 Turin - Italy has turned corruption into an art.
      2004 Athens - destroyed their economy.


      And really Brazil, why not take the opportunity to spend some of that graft building waste treatment plants that will serve your population well after the games are over?
      But I see I have answered my own question...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    9. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      2012: Every part of the UK *except* London was opposed. We all saw what would happen: A huge heap of tax money would go to fund an event that would be of no benefit at all to anyone outside of London, as what few benefits remained after the games ended would all be focused on that city.

      Turned out the benefits weren't much use to London either. No-one actually wants a velodrome.

    10. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      There are parts of Britain that *aren't* London?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIFA is in the process of cleaning house (hopefully) so maybe the IOC is next.

      Hahahahaha ha ha ha, *gasp* *wheeze*....
      Now, where was I? Oh, yes.
      HAHAHAHA!

    12. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear some of it is Ireland, and potentially infested with whales.

    13. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by swb · · Score: 1

      It's not why do the third-world shitholes bid on the Olympics, it's how do they win the bids?

      In theory, the ability to host the games -- availability of venues and the ability to build facilities and the ability to keep the whole thing going -- would be a huge deciding factor.

      Which you would think would mostly rule out third world countries, either because of their obvious inability to make their own economies work with minimal corruption, or even a benevolent paternalism that *just maybe* they shouldn't be spending a few billion dollars on facilities they have no use for when the general population is hurting.

      But, it's kind of like the UN, because everybody gets to vote, the kleptocrats get to stack the deck, and there's big money to be made for the right people in the right places. Billions in construction contracts, lots of short-term money to be made on food and beverage, etc.

      Sure, when it's all over you've got a bunch of unpaid bills and you end up with "ownership" of what amounts to an abandoned amusement park, but people who realize this don't get to vote.

    14. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think USA Olympic athletes are covered by health insurance, because 'Murica. If they even have Obamacare, they are probably lucky.

      Huh? I think you missed the point of "Obamacare". Everybody in "Murica" has health insurance now. Either you paid yourself or your employee did.

    15. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by dafradu · · Score: 1

      Or they could just go to any public hospital in Brazil and have all the treatment they need for free.

    16. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Some think Greece started spiraling down economically due to the 2000 Olympics. Sydney took it up the old poop shoot financially and I've heard wishes they had never hosted.

      You have your years mixed up. Athens 2004, Sydney 2000.

      In the case of Sydney, they built a number of purpose built facilities, on the western fringe of the city. The ideology being that western Sydney is a growth area and if we build it, they will come. The problem being that the main stadium has been largely a white elephant and financial black hole, not frequently drawing big enough crowds for rugby and being an awkward shape for AFL whose fans prefer the smaller SCG.

      Contrast that with Melbourne, which hosted a modest 2006 Commonwealth Games. The MCG, cricket's jewel, got a much needed upgrade and other venues received funding. Perhaps a waste of money for the schools-and-hospitals crowd but a sport loving city will use the facilities for decades to come (contrast the annual re-purposing of Albert Park for a Grand Prix which leeches money to Bernie Eccleston).

      I'd welcome if Melbourne bid for the Olympics again - it might finally get the dickheads in the capital to fund a rail link to the city's airport which various state and federal governments have been dithering over for 40 years. (I don't mind the Skybus, personally, but for a major world event you need a train line.)

    17. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      You got away Scot-free.

    18. Re:Why are the Olympics held in shitholes? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The entire south-east is now essentially 'outer London.'

  16. Who made this decision? by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So Rio says they want to host the Olympics and says everything's fine and everyone just takes their word for it without one single water of pollution or air test? The same with China. Is the IOC that stupid or is this just a corrupt best bribe wins scenario?

    1. Re:Who made this decision? by superdave80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is the IOC that stupid or is this just a corrupt best bribe wins scenario?

      Yes.

    2. Re:Who made this decision? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Is the IOC that stupid or is this just a corrupt best bribe wins scenario?

      Yes.

    3. Re:Who made this decision? by Drathos · · Score: 1

      They didn't say "everything's fine" in the bidding, they said "everything will be fine." That gave them time to fix things. They failed.

      Beijing did improve their air quality for the Olympics, but not to the degree that they should have - and as I understand things, they quickly reverted afterward.

      --
      End of line..
  17. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your legs don't work? I'd spend a year walking if I had to leave such a shit hole.

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what? Go into the jungle or someone's yard to scavenge for food? The idea of being poor, is that they are just barely striking a balance or trying to, to stop from dying or generally becoming worse off.

      If they went walking like you stated, they'd likely end up with more than just muscle pains, considering how filthy the area seems to be.

    2. Re:What? by omnichad · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd spend a year walking if I had to leave such a shit hole.

      You have died of dysentery

    3. Re:What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Really. So the million refugees that made it to Germany flew first class or something? No, they walked.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. All day, this.

      We populated the entire damn earth by walking.

    5. Re: What? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "This. All day, this.

      We populated the entire damn earth by walking."

      There were no electric fences then and you didn't need any Visa either.

    6. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the area isn't really filthy, it's just the lagoon. Raw sewage is disposed there because of the lack of proper sanitation infrastructure.

      That said, many major cities around the world have had (or still have) the same problem, including London and New York. The mistake here is holding the comptetitions there. They should have taken it to some other lagoon, there are others nearby. The cameras wouldn't get the famous landmarks, but I still think the PR would be better.

    7. Re:What? by Kkloe · · Score: 2

      yes, but come over the greatest hurdles they paid for it, the ones fleeing are not the poor ones, its the ppl who had money before the conflict started, now they had to pay off smugglers to take them to places and come broke to those countries

    8. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I live in London and have never heard of anything like a lagoon full of sewage. Presumably parent is stuck in some pre-Victorian fantasy of London. It is true that the older (yes Victorian) parts of the system are undergoing upgrade to cope with increasing population, but sewage in the Thames is something out of Dickens. What we have now are fish, seals and the occasional whale.

      Incidentally our last Olympics here in London was used as an excuse to asphalt over a large area of marshland habitat to rare species, and is currently being sold off to foreign property investors. Meanwhile the local affordable housing is being closed and knocked down to socially cleanse those
      less well off. Id say what Rio is getting is another problem in the form of multinational exploitation shrouded in some bread and circuses.

    9. Re:What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And die of starvation on your walk? When you assume you can eat for a year while "poor" you don't understand what that means.

    10. Re:What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they walked with food and support provided by the UN and others. They didn't pack for a month long walk self-contained. When that's been done historically it results in mass death. Go read up on the Trail of Tears.

      And the refugees that went to Germany, many made the last leg on a train. They walked to refugee camps, but once assigned resettlement destinations, traveled as you would have (except you'd have paid extra for first class on the train, so you wouldn't have to sit with them).

    11. Re: What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So who walked to the Solomon Islands? Why have domesticated animals been depicted back as long as records have existed? Because humans have *not* walked everywhere.

    12. Re:What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If you're in good health, have a supply of water treatment pills, and follow a stream (or pond hop) you can walk a month dragging along 30 pounds total supplies.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:What? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      You ever heard of indentured servitude? Or paying for relatives from the Old Country to immigrate? Or charity?

      You might want to read _Ethnic America_. It was more than Puritans that immigrated, you know. And there are lots of ways -- commercial, familial, charitable -- to finance the immigration of desperately poor people.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    14. Re:What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And those are rarely (never?) the conditions of refugees.

    15. Re:What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If you can afford to pay $20,000 or more for a place on a leaky boat (most of the refugees paid people smugglers and bribes), you can afford 30 pounds of food.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    16. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the solution of a country's poor ianto walk away to the neighbor country? Ah, forgot.to mention that getting to Germany involves NO RAIN FOREST CROSSING

    17. Re: What? by deekattax · · Score: 0

      You really have no idea of what conditions surround the poor in third world country. You'd be adorable if you weren't such a blatant cretin.

    18. Re: What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What is your problem? I never said it was the solution. Just that it's possible to do.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re: What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      People who are able to pay smugglers between $20,000 and $80,000, plus various bribes, are hardly "3rd-world poor."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    20. Re: What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And those are the majority of those sitting in camps in a war zone? Nope, those are a small few that pay $20k to get to the front of the queue. The boat refugees are more likely 20s-30s and male. The camp refugees are old or young and adults are more likely female. The males will try to get a foothold for the family they left behind, and cheat to get to the front to get their family in. They sell everything they own for a spot on a boat. That's not rich.

    21. Re: What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      No - those are the ones who actually made it out of the war zone by boat, etc. Never said anything about those in camps in a war zone - which would be in Syria, not in Europe.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    22. Re: What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Some of the refugees being delivered in Germany are plucked by the UN from camps in Syria and transported to Europe.

      You don't know what's actually happening. You just know that you hate everyone, and are tolerant of none.

    23. Re: What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      That's only SOME. And yes, I do know what's happening - we wanted to take in 25,000 from the Syrian UN camps (a more reasonable move than just letting any old migrant who can bribe their way into the country in), but they simply don't have enough that are ready, so we had to go to camps in Turkey as well. Also, a lot of them aren't ready for the cold weather here - complaining even during a comparative mild spell

      Not my fault you hate facts.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    24. Re: What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are the one that hates facts. Now you are contradicting yourself about how "rich" they are, and where they are coming form and going to. Lying to make a point just makes you a liar.

    25. Re: What? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You're the one who hates the facts, and you're the one who is lying to "make a point." You just had to do a bit of research. W'e're talking about places like Damascus where wages average $50 a month, and one month's salary buys 15 kg of bananas. People smugglers aren't running a charity. There's the cost of illegal transport, fake documents, bribes, etc.

      Abu Mahmoud is richer than he has ever been, even when he was a doctor in Aleppo. Smuggling Syrians into Europe has made him $100,000 (£60,000) this month alone. But it is not an easy life.

      While he charged $1,100 (£700) for a crossing to Greece per refugee, to get to Germany might cost 2,000 euros, but to go on to Sweden or Norway, which are seen to have generous asylum and resettlement policies, costs another 3,000 or 4,000 euros on top.

      And that's not counting the "incidental expenses" ...

      Or this

      Migration solutions like a hundred thousand dollar speedboat run from Libya to Italy are apparently on offer but overall the transportation market is divided across national and racial lines. Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa pay on average around 700 euro per person to ride down in the cargo holds of whatever boats are available, often with catastrophic results. Richer patrons from the Middle East may pay 2000 euro a head to travel on the same boat, but they are up on deck.

      The most popular way to enter Europe remains by plane. So far, no solid data exists on the number of people who use planes as facilitators for slipping through Europe’s closed border. Anecdotes suggest that reaching Europe by air often involves a complex strategy. Iraqi refugees, for instance, can pay 16,000 euro to fly from Mosul to Paris via – and here’s the trick – Cayenne, Belem, Sao Paulo and Istanbul. Moroccan facilitators offer migrants a flight to Paris for five thousand euro that lets them bypass immigration authorities, instead using a hidden exit at Charles de Gaulle airport, an operation that obviously requires accomplices among airport staff and state administration.

      Only the poor wait in the UN camps.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  18. The should call Bill Murray by DougOtto · · Score: 1

    It's probably just a Babyruth.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
  19. One would thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clean water. The environment. Mother Earth. One would think you leftist pagans would be up in arms.

  20. That is pretty much nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 2

    There are about 6.4 million people living in Rio. They know what they can and cannot do safely. Copy that and you are done. Hint: Washing your hands before eating and not drinking unboiled tap-water pretty much covers it.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm. Boiled sewage. Great advice. Washing your hands? With what. Said sewage? More great advice.

    2. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Hint: Washing your hands before eating and not drinking unboiled tap-water pretty much covers it.

      Going for a swim in sewage lake is pretty much a bad idea too. So is rowing.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      And for fucks sake, don't swim (or boat) in any open bodies of water. One droplet on your lips and it's time for dysentery.

      In the third world, it's often a good idea to wear a surgical mask and eye protection anywhere near open water. It's not perfect protection, but it's better than nothing.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people in Rio actually swim in this lake of sewage they are going to use for Olympic events?
      Also,
      there are millions of people living in India who don't die from swimming in that filthy river they have over there.
      And still thousands of tourists get sick from the water.
      Just because the locals have built up a resistance doesn't mean you won't get sick.

    5. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Actually, the swim is not necessary, if you are careful not to swallow anything. Rowing is a pretty bad idea though, as it will be impossible to avoid swallowing and worse, aspirate water-spray in the air. The proposed measures are a completely ineffective show, except for the vaccinations.

      I was actually commenting on the water supply, on the rowing I agree.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not really. If that were true, the human race would be extinct. Quantity does matter with this type of infection risk.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So how is washing your hands going to prevent you from getting bit by a mosquito carrying the zika virus?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Competing in the Olympics is not a good idea when pregnant, obviously. But nice try spreading confusion!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      Who said anything about competing in the Olympics while pregnant? There's this thing called "tourists", you know. And then there's the media invasion.

      But now that you bring it up, at lease one case of zika in the US was transmitted via an infected man's semen..

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You did.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The 6.4 million Rio residents are perhaps a little better acclimatised to the local conditions though, so following their lead is probably not enough.

    12. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Liar.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:That is pretty much nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's about 6.8 million people living in Cairo. If you copy what they do you get Schistosomiasis.

  21. So change the venue by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The U.S. will send 48 rowers to Rio, and they will be as forewarned and forearmed as the federation can make them, starting with squeeze bottles of hand sanitizer that will be distributed on the flight to Brazil.

    Hand sanitizer will do absolutely nothing to keep athletes from being infected with pathogens from the water. If they cannot deal with the problem then they need to change the venue. If that is not in Brazil then so be it.

    Hannafin says the athletes have been asked to get hepatitis A vaccinations and polio boosters and take the oral typhoid vaccine. Their oar handles will be bleached and their boats washed inside and out after each training session or competition. Gear will be laundered at a high enough temperature to kill microbes."

    All fine but if the water is filled with fecal matter or other pathogens there are countless other ways they can get sick, many of which can affect their athletic performance. Hard to win a gold medal when you are puking your guts out from exposure to pathogens.

    1. Re:So change the venue by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      I agree 1000%. Hand sanitizer is all and good for dealing with a small amount of bacteria, but we are talking parasites like schistosomiasis:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24310377

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  22. Who approves this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should be bring the entire earth to a 3rd world country to participate in something healthy, only to subject them to the filthiest most polluted shit around?

    We might as well hold the Olympics in the Liberian capital of Monrovia

    1. Re:Who approves this crap? by random+coward · · Score: 1

      I like that Idea; Permanently hold the Summer Olympics in Liberia!

      Now where to permanently place the winter games....

    2. Re:Who approves this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a place that's shitty and cold... Canada?

  23. Re:It's sad what the Republicans have done... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Silly leftists, confusing classism with racism yet again! Jobs get offshored for one reason and one reason alone: to maximize profits! If profits are maximized by adversely effecting the health of citizens in another country, it doesn't matter what color they are, had profits!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. Tourism requires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot hookers and cheap coke. Rio qualifies.

    1. Re:Tourism requires by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      So does https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (and better!)

  25. Democrats/Socialists by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    They live in crap and want fairness so everyone must also...

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  26. Winner's curse by sjbe · · Score: 2

    The got the Olympics. I'd say they outsmarted everyone.

    Apparently you've never heard of the winner's curse. It's not hard to argue that "winning" the right to host the Olympics is something of a Pyrrhic victory. It's really expensive to host the games and relatively few games are profitable for the host country.

    1. Re:Winner's curse by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Not if you don't have to do clean up/build out.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  27. and they chose Rio over Chicago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in Chicago, you'll get great food and clean water..

  28. snope, I didn't hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The parts that George Takai (aka Sulu) didn't read...

    The origin of the pesticide theory was, surprise surprise, a small physicians’ group that campaigns against pesticides. The group hasn’t done any epidemiology to demonstrate that people exposed to the pesticide are more likely to have babies with microcephaly; it has simply laid out an argument. The mainstream groups, looking at this problem holistically, have said there’s much better evidence that mosquitoes are hurting people than the evidence (and there’s no evidence, really) that the stuff killing mosquitoes is hurting people.

    ... and...

    All of this information is readily available to any genuine scientist looking dispassionately at the potential causes of the Zika virus outbreak or the rise in malformations in Brazil. Also readily available is the knowledge that the use of pyriproxifen is driven by WHO recommendations and not the marketing activity of any multinational or other corporation.

    The potential human health consequences of discouraging the use of pyriproxyfen in drinking water storage and other mosquito-reduction programs is catastrophic with potential deaths and serious disease from otherwise avoidable malaria, dengue and other mosquito-borne diseases numbered in at least the hundreds of thousands. If these reports and suggestions are motivated by anything other than ignorance and poor scholarship they are deserving of the most strident condemnation.

    Journalists covering this story would do well to research the background of those making and reporting the claims as the underlying story and potential public health consequences may be far more newsworthy than the current headlines.

    ... and ...

    * Neither Monsanto nor our products have any connection to the Zika virus or microcephaly.
    * Monsanto does not manufacture or sell Pyriproxyfen.
    * Monsanto does not own Sumitomo Chemical Company. However, Sumitomo Chemical Company is one of our business partners in the area of crop protection.
    * Glyphosate is not connected in any way to the Zika virus or microcephaly.
    * GMOs have no role in the Zika virus or microcephaly.

    1. Re:snope, I didn't hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit reading Takei a long time ago. He occasionally throws out funny stuff, but he's really just turned into a bitter old man.

    2. Re:snope, I didn't hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And brazil doesn't like GMO crops very much, so they're not as widespread here. OTOH, we use pesticides, including those that are forbidden by law everywhere *INCLUDING* in Brazil, like water.

      So, well... if pesticides can cause it, we'd have seen that a lot earlier. If the mosquitos or virus mutated, that will be a lot more likely reason.

  29. At least no Smell-A-Vision by random+coward · · Score: 1

    Be grateful there is no smell-a-vision! Imagine the coverage if there was.

  30. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by dargaud · · Score: 3, Informative

    And don't forget leptospirosis as well. GF got it, was misdiagnosed repeatedly and almost died of it.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  31. crime rates by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    On a different front:

    According to online stats, maybe up to 10,000 athletes attend the Olympic Games. I wonder how many will be held up at gun point and robbed if any are silly enough to venture outside their sanitized zones of the city?

    I'm sure there'll be some interesting heaadlines out of this Olympics, for sure...

    1. Re:crime rates by qbast · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. They will spend most of the time in toilet due to diarrhoea.

  32. What is the real problem here? by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Commercial pumps are available that can circulate a million litres of water a hour through industrial filters and are relatively inexpensive at a few thousand pounds. They are also small and portable enough to fit dozen or more in single commercial Intermodal shipping container.

    So what is the real problem here?

    1. Re:What is the real problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem, based on an article I read yesterday somewhere, is that the people of Rio typically pitch their trash/sewage/etc. into the waterways around Rio. One million litres of water per hour sounds like a lot until you realize there are more than trillions of litres of water to filter and trash/sewage/etc. from millions of people is being poured into the waterways about as fast as you can remove it.

      Being an amateur triathlete, I was at least happy to see that ocean off of Copacabana seems to be relatively clean - for the time being, at least.

  33. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to Olympic fever :P

  34. Re:It's sad what the Republicans have done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > They'd rather see some brown person die from cancer than an American.

    I didn't realize American was a race.

  35. Should of been Chicago! we have good water by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Should of been Chicago! we have good water and Less crime.

    Also good food and beer!!!

    1. Re:Should of been Chicago! we have good water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's "should have" not "should of". Please Chicago, you are embarrassing us.

    2. Re:Should of been Chicago! we have good water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should of been Chicago! we have good water and Less crime.

      Also good food and beer!!!

      Hell no, Chicago is enough of a wannabe police-state without the Olympics showing up. Not to mention that we don't need even more traffic and more construction.

      Only the politicians wanted it, nobody who actually lives in or around Chicago wanted the Olympics there.

    3. Re:Should of been Chicago! we have good water by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      we needed the construction. Would of been nice to use them to tell Long Grove to F* off and build 53.

    4. Re:Should of been Chicago! we have good water by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      The IOC apparently uses the same method that Chicago governors use to pick appointees for vacated Senate seats.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:Should of been Chicago! we have good water by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many Bentleys Daley would by with all that Olympic kickback money.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  36. Eurgh by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1

    What a mess - Beijing Summer and Sochi Winter Olympics despite all the human rights problems with China and Russia. Preparations for Athens were a joke.

    And now all these problems surrounding Brazil. I don't want to "ban" countries from bidding, but the IOC (FIFA, etc) really need to get their acts together in only awarding major sporting events to countries that have proven how they will host, not just fantasies.

    1. Re:Eurgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a mess - Beijing Summer and Sochi Winter Olympics despite all the human rights problems with China and Russia. Preparations for Athens were a joke.

      And now all these problems surrounding Brazil. I don't want to "ban" countries from bidding, but the IOC (FIFA, etc) really need to get their acts together in only awarding major sporting events to countries that have proven how they will host, not just fantasies.

      >countries that have proven how they will host
      How would any country become a first time host?

  37. I live in Rio by spaceman375 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm so going to get buried by mods who disagree rather than marked informative, but here goes.

    I moved to Rio 6 months ago from New Jersey. (Yeah, I know, NJ is the land where every puddle has its own rainbow.) I know 4 other people who moved here from the US within the last 2 years. Not one of us has gotten sick. Okay, I'll stop with the anecdotal evidence now. How about, this place is CLEANER than New York City. How many folks swim in the Hudson or the East River? I see fruit dropped from trees, yet there's WAY fewer bugs, and I've yet to see a single rat. The water doesn't smell; people here swim in it all the time, yet the hospitals aren't overflowing with sick folks. It's true, all the locals drink filtered water, but that's NOT connected to the lake. It's called Lagoa BTW, for lagoon in portuguese. The tap water is tainted because poor people break into the water mains feeding the city to get free water, and they don't exactly make good plumbers. Try applying statistics and I'll bet that more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers" than would get sick from the water in the lagoon. If they are so afraid, then take some antibiotics while here, a few yogurts (or kefir) when done, and call it good. But all that "Oh God it's a shithole!" is far from the truth - you're just regurgitating what you read in the sensationalist media. Stop playing telephone and ask someone who's been there - Rio is Fine; far cleaner than many other cities I've seen.

    --
    On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    1. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice post. There's a job waiting for you at a modest building on Savushkina Street, St. Petersburg.

    2. Re:I live in Rio by fonos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm so going to get buried by mods who disagree rather than marked informative, but here goes.

      I moved to Rio 6 months ago from New Jersey. (Yeah, I know, NJ is the land where every puddle has its own rainbow.) I know 4 other people who moved here from the US within the last 2 years. Not one of us has gotten sick.

      How often do you swim in the rivers/lakes there, or do other water sports?

      Okay, I'll stop with the anecdotal evidence now. How about, this place is CLEANER than New York City. How many folks swim in the Hudson or the East River?.

      Nobody is trying to have an Olympic event in the Hudson or the East River.

      Stop playing telephone and ask someone who's been there - Rio is Fine; far cleaner than many other cities I've seen.

      Maybe so, but that doesn't have anything to do with the fact that the lakes/rivers are so polluted that you shouldn't be having athletic competitions in them.

    3. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "How many folks swim in the Hudson or the East River?"

      How many Olympic events are being held there? Of course many cities have polluted areas, but Rio has to have their event in polluted areas. Only 20% of their waste is being filtered.

      "The water doesn't smell; people here swim in it all the time, yet the hospitals aren't overflowing with sick folks."

      Are you saying the water IS clean, even though numerous studies have been done? We're not talking about other unclean cities, we're talking about Rio's water, and it's polluted. Maybe immunity, maybe luck, maybe certain areas are less polluted as to why hospitals aren't overflowing.

    4. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who swims in the Hudson River? Cosmo Kramer that's who.

    5. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Rio tourism authority is hiring people from New Jersey now?

    6. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah! In Brazil they only shit in the designated shitting lagoons.

    7. Re:I live in Rio by wickerprints · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All you have provided is individual anecdotes and irrelevant analogies.

      The only thing that matters is the actual level of contamination in the affected body of water, as measured by scientific instruments, and an objective risk analysis of pathogenicity based on those measurements. In plain English, your stories about people swimming and fruit dropping from trees means fuck all.

      The water was already tested many months ago, and the levels of harmful bacteria and viruses were deemed too high to be safe:

      http://espn.go.com/olympics/st...

      At that time, some people even suggested that athletes competing in these water events should arrive in Rio early, train in the contaminated environment, get sick with the local diseases, and hopefully build up immunity before the Olympics. That, in my view, is an insane proposition.

    8. Re:I live in Rio by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      How about, this place is CLEANER than New York City. How many folks swim in the Hudson or the East River?

      Thousands, actually.

    9. Re:I live in Rio by purplepolecat · · Score: 1

      more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers"

      Great, now all our athletes will catch the Autism! At least they'll be eligible for the Special Olympics next time around.

      Seriously though, you should not have brought up the anti-vaxx/oh noes chemicals points here, it ruins your credibility.

    10. Re:I live in Rio by Nemyst · · Score: 0

      Try applying statistics and I'll bet that more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers" than would get sick from the water in the lagoon.

      Why the quotes, exactly? Hand sanitizers aren't exactly rocket science or even controversial. If you think they are, I don't think I'll be taking the rest of your post seriously.

    11. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a kid (I'm in Houston now) I swam on the Hudson (upstate, not near NYC) most of the days I could during the summer. Considering the environmental protections then and now, I'd hazard a guess that the Hudson is even safer to swim now than then. Just because it isn't the world's most beautiful water doesn't mean it is safe or unsafe. What we are dealing with here is not a conversation about the Hudson, but a conversation about a Lagoon in Rio that is known to be unsafe by testing. Whatever you think about the Hudson, it's not going to change the Lagoons in Rio.

    12. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your profession? I'm guessing from the text you wrote that it is neither "scientist" nor "doctor".

    13. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... And you're not biased in the least. It's not like you made a (possibly poor) life changing decision and need to justify it or anything...

    14. Re:I live in Rio by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't so much the tap water. That's easy enough to filter. The problem is Rio has MILLIONS of people who live in shantytowns, that have no sewers or running water. This means sewage runs off to the nearest body of water.

      Here's a map of the favelas: https://www.google.com/maps/d/...
      Here's the map of the venus: http://www.rio2016.com/en/venu...

    15. Re:I live in Rio by jittles · · Score: 1

      You're crazy man. There is no way that there are more bugs running around NYC than there are in Rio. I'm wondering whether you've ever actually been to Brazil. I'm not trying to say that Brazil is a dirty or uninhabitable country but Rio is inside of the tropics. There is so much more plant life and far better weather for bugs in the (typical) tropical biome than any other part of the world. The warm weather year round, rain fall, and lush foliage in Rio gives bugs everything they need to survive. You'll find cockroaches in the tropics that are way bigger than you'll find anywhere in NYC. And then you go into this diatribe about vaccines and hand sanitizers? Sure buddy.

    16. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'll bet that more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers"

      I stopped reading here.

      a) Vaccines are typically not a problem and except in rare cases they provide better protection than not taking them
      b) Everything, and I mean everything is toxic. Even straight up DHMO. However, hand sanitizer is one of the least toxic items that you won't typically be eating. It's made from ethanol with nasty tasting (but not toxic) crap added to keep the addicts away. Seriously, people actually do drink the stuff and all it does is get them drunk. But of course, alcohol is toxic, no shit. But of all the things to worry about...

      Ok, so I lied. I read a bit more:

      >If they are so afraid, then take some antibiotics while here, a few yogurts (or kefir) when done, and call it good.

      Might as well suggest they visit a witchdoctor. Antibiotics taken for fun is a horrible idea. Absolutely horrible. You should know why. And yogurt as a cure against contaminated water? Holy fuck, what's next, a 30 C dilution?

    17. Re:I live in Rio by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      No, they're just overhyped and good for creating bacteria that are resistant to whatever is in them.

      "Kills 99.9% of bacteria"...yeah that number definitely doesn't sound pulled out of someone's ass to make good marketing.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    18. Re:I live in Rio by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and I'll bet that more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers" than would get sick from the water...

      OK. You almost made it. You were sounding plausible, up until the crack-pot sentence above.

      Vaccines—unhealthy—Really?

      "Toxic chemicals in the hand 'sanitizers'..."?!? Again—Really? Well, OK, the active ingredient in hand sanitizers is usually ethanol – booze. Yes, that's toxic, but is sold as a casual social lubricant just about everywhere on the planet – for humans' internal consumption. The active ingredient in a few others might be isopropanol – AKA 'rubbing alcohol'. It's more expensive, so less common in 'hand sanitizers', but is what your physician uses to clean the skin before giving you a shot.

      FTA: The PR flak's suggestion of hand-sanitizer use on athletes' way to the Olympic Games was quite comical.

    19. Re:I live in Rio by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You know, you sounded reasonable until you started suggesting that hand sanitizers (which are mostly just alcohol) and vaccines (which have an extremely low rate of causing sickness) than by exposure to contaminated water in a foreign country (especially without travel vaccinations) will cause.

      After that, you sound like the kind of loony that anybody with a serious respect for their own health should ignore, or even take do the opposite of your recommendations. You completely blew your credibility.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    20. Re:I live in Rio by onkelonkel · · Score: 2

      "Whatever is in them". - They contain ethanol. Ethanol will happily kill bacteria on contact. Bacteria do not become resistant to ethanol. They just die.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    21. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which other Olympic Host Cities that you've seen are dirtier than Rio?

    22. Re:I live in Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Brazilian. Unfortunately your "anecdotal evidence" is wrong.

      Samples from most important media portals in Brazil (google translate them): Globo, Record, Folha.

    23. Re:I live in Rio by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      How many folks swim in the Hudson or the East River?

      Actually, the Hudson river and East river is relatively clean considering the Hudson river is a major international shipping through-way because of its deep water ports and proximity to NYC. People do swim in the mouth of the Hudson river (Coney Island Beach), and every spring people take a swim in the East river. Every now and again healthy dolphins feed in those rivers. Favorably comparing "lagoa" (better known as lake cesspool) in Rio to the Hudson river is a grave insult to NY and NJ.

    24. Re:I live in Rio by koiduadoi · · Score: 1

      Addmefast Imacros script 2016 - Working 100% Hello everyone, I just find a lot of addmefast imacros on google but mostly don't work. So i decided to fix some code. Here the result. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... It's working good for me. I hope it works good for you too.

  38. Saw this one coming by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    This happens every time. The IOC is bribed and promised all sorts of things (Chine: Suuuure, we'll let the media roam freely and report whatever they like. Promise!). Then, when it is too late to change venues, the host country reneges on all those promises, knowing that it is too late for the IOC to move the venue. If the IOC had any brains, they would require certain minimum standards be in place BEFORE they even look at a hosting proposal. But then, who would pay for their kids' private tuition?

    1. Re:Saw this one coming by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      " If the IOC had any brains, they would require certain minimum standards be in place BEFORE they even look at a hosting proposal."

      But no city is going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars-equivalent to meet standards for a bid they would probably lose anyway.

    2. Re:Saw this one coming by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      If a country isn't willing to spend the money to clean up their sewage-infested waterways BEFORE getting the Olympic hosting gig... what is their motivation to do it AFTER they have been given the hosting gig?

  39. Might as well hold them in Tijuana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tijuana river would be the same.

  40. yeah, boycott the 2016 Olympic games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rio has had 6 years to get its act in order, which it has failed to do. For the sake of athlete health, reducing the spread of Zika, and for showing that a country has to follow through on the ludicrous demands of the IOC, the 2016 Olympics should be cancelled.

    1. Re:yeah, boycott the 2016 Olympic games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't take much to do that either. If the US, China, Russia, and a couple of other countries (like Australia, some in Europe, South Korea) agreed to hold events somewhere else (maybe split them and have Athletics in the US, Swimming in China, some in Russia, etc.) then the IOC would almost have to cave.

    2. Re:yeah, boycott the 2016 Olympic games. by myid · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't take much to do that either. If the US, China, Russia, and a couple of other countries (like Australia, some in Europe, South Korea) agreed to hold events somewhere else (maybe split them and have Athletics in the US, Swimming in China, some in Russia, etc.) then the IOC would almost have to cave.

      I agree. The Olympics are scheduled for August 5-21. Some universities have Olympic-sized pools, which the universities might be willing to rent during those days for a couple of weeks. And there are plenty of beaches around the world, whose water is clean enough for rowing and sailing.

      With the Olympics split up like this, spectators would see only part of the Olympics live. But on the other hand, splitting up the Olympics would let more people around the world see some games live. And splitting up the games would lessen the crush/crunch of hotels and transportation.

  41. Should have never given the Olympics bid to them.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazil must have done some serious bribery to get selected for the Olympics. Hope they can handle all the lawsuits that they get from athletes who become sick and disabled because of all this shit.....

    Fuckin' fuckwad fuckers....

  42. The city spent money on Olympics no money for wate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the city spent all this huge amount of money for the Olympics but water....naah.

    Cronies must be enriched. Even if people are going to suffer from pollution.

  43. terceira base by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey, is this where the water polo events are being held?"

    "No, no, read sign, estupido! It say 'water polio'!"

  44. Affirmative action and bribery by slew · · Score: 1

    Why can't we have the Olympics or the World Cup in a city that doesn't have to spend years and years building up its infrastructure? It doesn't do much for the economies of these countries, and the stadiums fall into disuse after the games anyway.

    Although most games occur in "rich" countries that can afford it, the IOC often feels the need for "affirmative action" to let "poor-er" nations into the rotation (it's basically a popularity vote among IOC members to select from supposedly pre-vetted candidates that pony up the $150K fee). Rio is getting about USD$1.5B to "help" them host the games.

    Also, in general, it's much easier to shake down money from construction companies to bribe IOC members, if your country is swimming in corruption already. If a country already has most of the venues it needs, the construction companies have no reason to play ball and support an Olympic games bid.

    There's a lot of money in construction, for instance, Construtora Norberto Odebrecht, OAS, Andrade Gutierrez, Queiroz Galvao, and Carioca Christiani Nielsen Engenharia... The CEO of Odebrecht (the largest construction contractor for the Rio games) has already been arrested for unrelated bribery and money laundering charges and the speaker of the lower house is under investigation for accepting a 1.9M (Brazilian Real) bribe from OAS to push through tax break legislation for construction companies working in Rio...

  45. Re:It's sad what the Republicans have done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Islam is a race too.

  46. Tech to the rescue ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to make a statement:

    Outfit all your rowing teams in Biohazard Suits. They probably won't win, but they'll make the point :D
    ( as a bonus, they won't come home with all sorts of fun pathogens to make life hell )

  47. So cancel the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rio does not meet the requirements so cancel the thing. At some point the olympic committee has to show it has power and will not put up with incomplete projects. This will send a message to all future bidders that they had better make sure they can deliver.

    Or is the Olympics "too big to fail" and the money is more important than the health of the athletes?

    1. Re:So cancel the thing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      They won't cancel it because that would mean losing all the TV and sponsorship $$$$.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  48. You're an anti-vaxxer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try applying statistics and I'll bet that more athletes will be compromised by the vaccines and the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers" than would get sick from the water in the lagoon.

    You were potentially making sense right up until you suggested they'd be compromised by "vaccines" in the hand sanitizes... Anti-vaxxer's on /.? What has this place come to.

    1. Re:You're an anti-vaxxer? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I think the poster meant that people who get vaccines for things before traveling, sometimes experience negative side effects. Sore arm at the injection site, low-grade fever, etc. If you are a top-notch athlete competing against other top-notch athletes, even a minor annoyance like a muscle spasm at the wrong time can greatly affect the outcome of the competition. I don't think spaceman was implying the athletes were going to become autistic. I can't imagine doing a routine on the rings after getting a shot in the arm. Can you?

    2. Re:You're an anti-vaxxer? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      more athletes will be (compromised by (the vaccines) and (the toxic chemicals in the hand "sanitizers"))

      I don't think he was saying there are vaccines in the sanitizers.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:You're an anti-vaxxer? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sore arm at the injection site, low-grade fever, etc. If you are a top-notch athlete competing against other top-notch athletes, even a minor annoyance like a muscle spasm at the wrong time can greatly affect the outcome of the competition

      Vaccination side-effects last hours to days. Vaccination effects last many years. If you're taking a vaccination right before your competition then you're as stupid as the GP's post.

  49. Swell. by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Some of the athletes preparing by having vaccinations will suffer temporarily reduced performance as a result of those vaccines, whether during their practice before the games or during the actual games. Holding the games in places with toxic air or disease-laden water needs to stop. Promises of "sure, we'll clean up in time for the games" just don't cut it.

    1. Re:Swell. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, they might even catch autism from the vaccines. Somehow I think the Olympic teams might just have slightly more qualified doctors than the average Slashdot reader, who can wejgh up the risks and make the appropriate decision.

  50. One nick could make them sick by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Okay, this is the biggest embarrassment the IOC has had yet, and the oympics haven't even started. Is it worth it for the rowers to put themselves through this. And the performance of the athletes..I doubt we'll be seeing any world records. Unless it's for racing in toxic conditions. The Olympics needs to come back to it's roots and remove the IOC as it exists today. And the rowers should refuse to compete. There are lives outside of the Olympics for professional athletes, and for the amateurs who wanted to start out in the olymtics...they have lives...period. Either way, the Olympics are not worth these health risks. The athletes might consider going on strike this year so their health and safety are properly protected which the IOC and Rio has blatantly failed to do.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  51. Tourist slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to Rio. Now with 75% less shit in the river!

  52. Keeps getting better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ok, so a recount:
    Zika, so better not take any pregnant or pregnantable athletes.
    Chinkungua.
    Dengue
    Foul water with untold germs possibly including flesh-eating staph.
    Crime bosses
    Unfinished venues
    Political turmoil.

    Should be a fun Games indeed. Can't wait for the body count.

  53. Maybe host in a better place .... by humptheElephant · · Score: 1

    Flint Michigan comes to mind. Nothing can live in their water. I'm sure Michigan's head honcho would love it.

  54. ANSWER: Cronies must benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government must funnel more money to cronies.

    Cronies build the stadium, they run the concessions, install infrastructure, and pave parking lots, etc.

  55. there are athletes in worse situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    down with rowers and kayakers; remember about windsurfers and surfers - they have to swim in this manure

  56. Just say no ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong here, Just say no not good enough ?

    Boycott the place, game over...next....

  57. Sanitized by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Gear will be laundered at a high enough temperature to kill microbes.

    Does nobody know the definition of "cleaned" "sanitized" and "sterilized" anymore? Gear will be sanitized. It's not that hard when there's already a word dedicated to that meaning.

  58. Pinhead babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Zika. Now your athletes win the chance to churn out mutated pinhead babies for their host countries. Funsies! Pinheads for everyone!

  59. Re: Brazil (one place for each Olympics) by vpness · · Score: 1

    Great idea. Truly. And, for 30 seconds, I thought it was. But then, I thought, who picks those two venues? The kick back of all kick backs ensues. As nice an idea it is, it'll never happen.

  60. Blonde in a gondola. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The U.S. will send 48 rowers to Rio, and they will be as forewarned and forearmed as the federation can make them

    Oh, just give them some trainig sessions in the canals of Venice, Italy. Moe or less, the city's public sanitation depends on the daily ebb-and-tide cycle to wash filth out of the shallow lagoon, into the "vast and empty" waters of the Adriatic (which is the second smallest sea on Earth...) If there is the wrong kind of wind, tidal water gets trapped in the lagoon and the decaying aquatic city swims in its own filth, including corpses of drowned rats. That's an extremely romantic memory.

  61. Support the more ethical side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IOC should get that money...laundered (at a high enough temperature to kill microbes).

    That's back to front.

    It's the IOC who should be laundered, and at a very high temperature. The more ethical microbes deserve protection.

  62. Surprise revelation... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    Here's the surprise.... Olympics not being held in Brazil. Being moved to North Korea. IOC was told the whole country is like one big Disney World! Should be great!!

  63. Tribes by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    "SJW" functions similarly to "liberal" and other pejoratives. It indicates a tribal allegiance on the part of the speaker: a sort of shibboleth. It means, "someone I don't identify with and have ascribed various bad qualities to."

    I have a vague sympathy for people who rail against perceived liberal social trends. I believe that it's about as effective as arguing with an advancing glacier, but it's not irrational to fear change. However, I can think of no surer sign that someone has discarded reason than the use of pejoratives against one's political enemies. You are no longer arguing against a man or against a rational position, you're arguing against a figment of your imagination. Denying your opponents their measure of common humanity also deeply undermines any moral argument at hand.

    In short, pejoratives such as "SJW", "liberal", "hipster", and "millennial" mean: the writer's opinions are not worth the time taken to read them.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  64. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look. I went to Brazil on business with several colleagues in 2014, and it seemed like hep A, polio, and typhoid were standard procedure for Brazil at the travel immunization clinic. I don't think that part has anything to do with the water; it's just Brazil.

  65. Q.E.D. mothafucka by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    The U.S. will send 48 rowers to Rio.
    They will be as forewarned.
    Forewarned is forearmed.
    Four arms is an odd number of arms for a rower to have.
    The only number that is both even and odd is infinity.
    Therefore... the US rowing team has an infinite number of arms.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:Q.E.D. mothafucka by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

      Horses have four legs.
      They have two rear legs, and forelegs in front.
      Six legs is an odd number of legs for a horse to have.
      The only number that is both even and odd is infinity.
      Therefore... the United States Equestrian Team has an infinite number of legs.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  66. Sewage Water, Zika Virus and...Radioactive Beaches by InfectedPacket · · Score: 1

    And just to add to all other afflictions plaguing theses Olympics, a reminder that Brazilian beaches have above average (natural) radioactivity (ScienceDirect.com). I think the only thing missing is the announcement of a imminent meteor shower on Rio.

    --
    @cyberrecce
  67. Bad management, yes, but put that in context. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Rio suffers from insufficient city management. Improvements that should have been done 50 years ago haven't been done. People in the U.S. often don't like dealing with details. Brazilians, in general, are even more intense about not liking details. So things don't get done.

    To get a more balanced view, consider the U.S. metropolitan area centered on Portland, Oregon:

    Intel has been emitting fluoride for years without state knowledge, permit. Quote: "When Intel applied for D1X approval, the company considered its fluoride emissions insignificant and did not include those. It was only when the company applied for the new DEQ permit required by greenhouse gas regulations that it requested a 6.4-tons-per-year fluoride emission limit. " 6.4-tons-per-year!!!

    Oregon warns home gardeners, Portland leaders lash out at state pollution response. Quote: "Regulators have known for years that Portland has high levels of the heavy metal cadmium in the air, but didn't know until 2015 what the likely sources were." Another quote: "The department's own air monitoring found arsenic levels were 159 times higher than the state's safety goal in Southeast Portland and cadmium levels were 49 times higher."

    Portland pollution: How does it affect you? Quote: "Tests detected cadmium and arsenic near Bullseye Glass in Southeast Portland and Uroboros Glass in North Portland. Superheating the metals, which are used to add color to glass, can send small particles up smokestacks and into surrounding air." The next paragraph: "The state also found that another carcinogen, hexavalent chromium, was used by the two plants."

    Portland, Oregon is no longer a livable city in other ways. There are now traffic jams most of the day. Yet Portland city management is allowing the construction of large buildings with no parking! One story: New Portland apartment buildings with no parking have neighbors worried about congested streets.

    The stories about Portland help give a more balanced view of the poor city management in Rio.

    I have lived in Brazil a total of about 3 years. When the 2008 financial crash occurred in the U.S., Brazilian newspaper writers were assigned to write stories about how the crash affected Brazil. The writers seemed to put a lot of effort into finding stories about bad effects, but they never seemed to find anything particularly bad. Why? Brazil has better banking laws and the laws were followed.

    The U.S. financial system continues to be corrupt. For example, see this story about Goldman Sachs: The Great American Bubble Machine.

    1. Re:Bad management, yes, but put that in context. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it isn't the management, but the funding. You can't get blood from a stone. And you can't do good management without funding to carry out the necessary work.

  68. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by Reziac · · Score: 1

    If there are rodents, there is lepto -- good rule of thumb. We vaccinate dogs and cattle against it, tho the vaccine is short-lived and not entirely reliable (still much better than nothing).

    Well, we used to vaccinate dogs... Most vets no longer do, because OMG-vaccine-reactions (which haven't actually been since since the 1960s) with the result of lepto epidemics in pets in some parts of California like nothing we've seen since before the vaccine went into common use.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  69. Fixing the Olympics so it doesn't bankrupt host. by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Summer Olympics should only be in Athens, and pick a cold city to have the Winter Olympics in and never change it.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  70. New world record? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    What if there's a new world record set, will there be the dreaded asterisk next to the time? At the bottom it'll say Time was in a shit pond. This tended to make them paddle to near exhaustion?

    It'll be great for the tv night comics.

    1. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      More bad news for our bet. February was even warmer than January, and not by a bit: http://www.drroyspencer.com/20...

      Good thing this is just a gentleman's bet because as you said: "I seem to have a difficult time collecting especially when the bet points out someone's stupidity, or they at least perceive it as stupidity because they drank the cool aid and believed someone else. Like someone betting that 2016 will be as hot or hotter than 2015. That's a stupid bet."

    2. Re:New world record? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      So start explaining - Feel free to use their models and reconcile the disparity for the past 16 years. Good luck with that. You can't do it with CO2 mathematically and I think you know it, or should.

      OTOH, There was a hell of a methane leak in California, just recently capped - http://www.bbc.com/news/scienc... . Using their scale, Methane is 25X more potent than CO2 and this one was a gusher. Methane BTW really is a gas that warms us. We can show it using the scientific method, unlike with CO2. There are also a number of other methane sources out there this year. So if you win and it's still doubtful, it wouldn't be because of MM CO2. It would be because of real warming gasses out there. Notice how Spencer doesn't even mention methane. Certainly he should know about it. I mean, this is in what he's supposedly knows about after all. So how can we take him seriously with such a blatant omission?

      Never the less, feel free to start explaining. I think I have at least one bag of popcorn. This should be good.

    3. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      You tell me. How did I know?

    4. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      P.S. I don't take Spencer seriously. He's a "skeptic" who doesn't believe in global warming because "Earth and its ecosystems—created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence —are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    5. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a hint. It wasn't the methane that let me call this one correctly. It is also not a surprise to anyone reading science sources rather than conspiracy blogs. I am not privy to some arcane knowledge. NASA, NOAA, and the MET Office all reported on this at the end of 2015.

    6. Re:New world record? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Heh...Thanks for the laugh! That's really funny to me. You're just two months into the new year and you're already declaring yourself the winner? Ok, that tells me you're a fool right there. Don't you know that God has a sense of humor? Maybe he'll wait until next year, when you're really cocky and bet say $10 grand on it... then pull the rug out from under you. Just like when there's a bad storm, or no storms, cold or not cold or fill in the blank. It's because of MMGW. Remember more hurricanes and more frequent after Katrina (one of Al Gore's quotes)? We've had fewer and weaker. Superstorm Sandy? Yea, not so much. It was just a hurricane. This was a superstorm - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . Imagine if that happened today. Oh look at MMGW...This IS PROOF! Yea, not so much of course.

      I didn't look at that reference that closely. I simply don't have the time. However it seemed clear he wasn't thinking multivariate. I've met a number of these government scientists, they think it's just CO2. If a scientist doesn't, he won't be there for long. That's clear. I've seen real scientists that worked for NOAA and such up until around 1993/4 time frame. That's when Al Gore came through the world weather building and had them fired, even guys that had worked there for 40 years. To me there was a clear agenda.

      Offer still stands. If there is such a thing as scientific proof (using the scientific method of course) that CO2 is a cause of global warming and not a symptom, show it to me. Maybe I've been teaching too long. To me it's a lot like students that study a bit and know what the result to an experiment lab should be based on the text for a reaction. Then they fiddle with their data to get the correct result. As if I won't know what is going on. That is what is happening with their models. As you should know, the IPCC admitted they couldn't explain what happened from 2000 - 2015. Why it didn't warm as they said it should. Yet somehow they increased how confident they are that they are right. Don't you find that at least troubling? Probably not of course.

    7. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      You're just two months into the new year and you're already declaring yourself the winner?

      I was the clear winner two months ago. Otherwise I wouldn't have made the bet. Do you know how I know this?

      If there is such a thing as scientific proof

      There is not. Proof is for alcohol and mathematics. I assume you are not a science teacher?

      show it to me

      Start with this one from 1896: http://articles.adsabs.harvard....914A/0000014.000.html

      And read through to this one from last year http://www.nature.com/nature/j...

      Yet somehow they increased how confident they are that they are right.

      It's explained in the IPCC AR5. If you are curious you can look it up.

    8. Re:New world record? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      Try this link for the 1896 paper: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40...

  71. A Gold in the Did Not Get Diseased Event! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compete in any watersport. Wait one month. See if you get:

    Cholera
    Diptheria
    Hepatitis
    Typhoid Fever
    Zika

    If you do not, you win a Gold Medal!!
       

  72. Olympic rowing sponsor expects to make a killing by Snufu · · Score: 1
  73. You know it's tough when by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    You can't even brag, "Now with 80% less sewage".

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  74. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If lepto is caused by bacteria, pray tell WTF lack of vaccination has to do with its outbreaks?

  75. Re:If there was ever a reason to boycott the Olymp by Reziac · · Score: 1

    The vaccine is a bacterin. It's effective for 6-12 months.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?