Slashdot Mirror


LG G5 Unveiled: 5.3" QHD Display, Snapdragon 820, Modular Magic Slot Expansion (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: Rather than just bring another smartphone update with the typical yearly iterative tweaks, the folks at LG have really done something transformative with their next generation G5 flagship smartphone. The aluminum unibody construction of the G5 brings with it a 5.3-inch QHD display, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor that is paired with 4GB of RAM. 32GB of internal storage is standard but there is a microSD card slot to allow for up to 2TB of expanded storage. On the rear, you'll find a fingerprint scanner and two cameras, a standard 16MP sensor and a 135-degree wide angle 8MP sensor. In addition, LG has included a USB-C port and removable 2800mAh battery. That's all rather routine stuff; what's truly innovative about the G5 is its Magic Slot, which brings a new modular twist to the Android platform. Pressing a key on the side of the G5 will eject its bottom section, which will also allow you to remove the battery. Then you can proceed to attach new modules, like the LG Cam Plus. The LG Cam Plus adds a camera grip to your G5 along with a dedicated camera button and a jog wheel for zooming. The module also boosts the battery capacity from 2800mAh to 4000mAh. The second module is the LG Hi-Plus, which brings with it an external 32-bit DAC and amplifier. This particular module was developed in conjunction with Bang and Olufsen and comes with a pair of H3 headphones that support native (Direct Stream Digital) DSD playback.

115 comments

  1. Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is far from routine and deserves special mention.

    1. Re:Removable battery by danomac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, it's why I bought the LG G4 when my Galaxy S3 died. I won't buy a phone without a removable battery and microSD slot, it's planned obsolescence. FWIW, the G4 also supports a 2TB expansion slot.

      I don't replace my phone every 1.5 years, having a removable battery is a very important feature to me.

    2. Re: Removable battery by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I replace my (i)Phone once every 4 years. It hasn't been an issue for me. Maybe ask LG to use higher quality batteries.

    3. Re: Removable battery by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It should still be removable and replaceable. The phone could explode if you can't *eject the core*

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Removable battery by Kjella · · Score: 2

      FWIW, the G4 also supports a 2TB expansion slot.

      Technically any phone that supports SDXC should be able to do that, it's the maximum defined in the standard but most just list the capacity available on release. And I don't think cards bigger than 512GB exist yet, so no you can't actually have that at least not today.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re: Removable battery by danomac · · Score: 2

      I had an iPhone a way long time ago - a 3G. After a year and a half, the battery wouldn't last longer than 4-5 hours. I ditched it then and only bought phones that had a removeable battery and microSD slot. With my Galaxy S3, I had already replaced the battery and used that phone over three years. I use the phone a lot for work (primarily email and scheduling) and don't have hardly any apps installed.

      I've always wondered if humid environments are harder on batteries? I've even had to replace the battery in my Harmony remote after 3 or so years. Right now it's 70%+ relative humidity outside. I have relatives that live in much drier climates that don't have issues with batteries like I do. I also have coworkers that have problems with the iPhone battery capacity dimishing, so it's not just me.

      I even had a spare battery for my S3. I always amused me how iPhone users always had to huddle around power outlets in public places because their phone is dying. I just put a fresh battery in my S3, although I haven't had to do this with my G4, it has a much bigger battery.

    6. Re:Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does the fact that their G4 suffers from a range of unfixable bugs, like the 'split screen' glitch, an endless reboot loop, and deciding it's suddenly going to stop responding to requests to do very complicated things like actually fucking turn on.

      You had your chance, LG. Back to Apple for me. I'm locked in to an ecosystem and can't change the battery, but those seem like small issues given that I can actually use my fucking phone to make phone calls.

    7. Re: Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the radio hardware draws more power in order to penetrate the humid air.

    8. Re: Removable battery by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Here's the thing for the wilfully obtuse (with glaring vested interests). I can sell my second Note 3 with a cheaply replaceable battery and voilà the person who buys it has a phone with full battery life because they can cheaply buy a new battery. This versus a battery change to regain full life as a major expenditure coming straight off the second hand value of the phone. So when I choose to swap phones that means at least, at the very least $100 more in my pocket (reality is phones without readily replaceable batteries are more likely to be just tossed, so more like a couple of hundred dollars extra in my pocket). Also added benefits, flash ram has life issues and by shifting things to readily replaceable storage, should it start to fail it can also be replaced. Also porting data to a new device, will I'll just store on it and swap it out.

      So basically screw the mega fucking bullshit PR crap about prettier phones when the reality is just all about forced redundancy. I want user replaceable storage memory (no fixed storage memory at all), user replaceable battery and waterproof and a stylus I can use as a handset and leave the phone in my pocket (you know neatly pops out the top with incoming call).

      Also from what is happening now days. I only want sufficient OS in the device to download and install the latest OS, with the latest security suite settings and I want that install to be anonymous.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re: Removable battery by slaker · · Score: 2

      If you're shooting a lot of images or video or making heavy use of the screen and your LTE connection, you'll drain a battery, no matter what the device is. In those circumstances, I'd far rather slap in another battery than be semi-permanently tethered to an external battery pack (although nothing stops an LG G-series phone from using those as well - the external charger that came with mine can even act as one).

      Most smartphones I have some experience with will shoot two or three hours of full HD video before they're drained. This include the reasonably new iphone 5.

      Bring a dedicated camera? Why? My phone fits my pocket and I'm 100% certain I'll have it with me at all times. It's easier to throw a spare battery in my jacket pocket or laptop bag than haul around another full piece of kit.

      By the same token, having a card reader still makes a lot of sense to me. There's something to be said for having 232GB of storage connected to a device I know I will always have on hand. You can argue you don't need it, but it seems shortsighted to suggest that reasoning applies to anyone else who might use a smartphone.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    10. Re:Removable battery by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Only a small percentage of G4s suffer from any of those glitches. If you are suffering from them, return your unit, its defective. Mine has worked perfectly for 6 months now, no glitches.

    11. Re:Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem being that the housing & receptacle easily takes 2-3mm of space between the battery and phone combined. Space that could be used for more battery.

      iPhone batteries are pretty easily replaceable, it's two screws for the back cover and one screw for the connector that attaches the power connector. I just had to replace a battery on an iPhone 4 a few months ago, which was six years old at the time. That's the first phone battery I've really had to replace, I've had at least as many problems with battery latches that broke. I've never really owned a spare battery, there was little need to field swap batteries as they typically last me more than a day.

    12. Re:Removable battery by danomac · · Score: 1

      And I don't think cards bigger than 512GB exist yet, so no you can't actually have that at least not today.

      Yes, but it is nice to actually *know*. Versus other phone manufacturers who don't publish that information, leaving you to wonder if a 128,64,32GB card will even *work* in the phone.

    13. Re:Removable battery by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Good news indeed but it's very very sad that this is even news. This should be the standard.

    14. Re: Removable battery by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Same here except i replaced an S5 with a dual sim G4. That S5 had a replaceable battery AND was waterproof. A great feat imho. I still don't understand why the S5 had mediocre sales and the S6 was considered in all the press to be a major improvement.

    15. Re:Removable battery by Nunya666 · · Score: 0

      The Galaxy S4 and S5 both have a removable battery and a microSD slot.

      Since the S6 has neither, I replaced my S3 with an S5 before the S3 had even died. I wanted to make sure I could avoid the "planned obsolescence" issue.

      I noticed that the recently-announced S7 brought back the microSD slot, but I have not noticed if it has a replaceable battery.

    16. Re:Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my phone a lot. The battery will never last a whole day with multiple hours of screen-on-time. I also hate using my phone while it's plugged in. The cord gets in the way while I'm holding the phone, and it puts stress on the charging port and the cord so they wear out more quickly. The easiest way to charge up my phone and continue using it is to pop the old battery out, charge it externally, and put a new charged battery in. Instantly back to 100%. If there were a screwdriver involved in this process, it would not be feasible. Thank you, LG, for making the phone that suits my workflow.

    17. Re: Removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I can't pull the battery, then I can never be sure if it's actually _turned off_. Being able to pull the battery is a very important feature.

  2. Translation by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    'Magic Slot' in translates to the English phase 'proprietary, non interoperable interface'

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Translation by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      I thought it translated to "Springboard Expansion Slot", but I guess I'm showing my age.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you know another maker doing add on modules that it needs to interoperate with? Maybe first to market can set standard?

    3. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also your Mom's nickname.

    4. Re: Translation by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      oh, you mean like Microchannel Array? RDRAM? Betamax? HDDVD (I actually have some of these - a 14-disc set put out by National Geographic)? :)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:Translation by mikael · · Score: 1

      Sony Vaio's had the Magic Gate SD Card (MSAC-M2) which of course isn't readable by anything else.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Translation by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Actually, according to Ars Technica, LG is planning on creating some sort of open ecosystem for third-party hardware. What exactly that means is yet to be seen, but they've at least said that is in their plans.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    7. Re:Translation by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      We're talking cell phones here; every single thing about them is proprietary and non-interoperable. Heck, even the same manufacturer will make things incompatible with their own previous generation product, just for the fun of it.

      External expansion also makes the phone incompatible with just about any case you can think of, and kills any hope of having a splash-proof or dust-proof phone; so you're in the position of needing a case (to protect it), but not being able to use a case (because then the expansion modules can't plug in).

    8. Re:Translation by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Any chance they're using Project Ara for this? That'd at least mean future interoperability.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Translation by Cederic · · Score: 1

      every single thing about them is proprietary and non-interoperable

      I know, they all have different headphone sockets, different USB connectors, different charging sockets, different UIs and you have to use wireless peripherals from the same manufacturer.

      I particularly loathe the way they only work on manufacturer specific networks; if only they'd come up with some form of standard.

    10. Re: Translation by dothasmurfysmurf · · Score: 1

      A good example of what GP is talking about is the batteries in the G3 and G4, both have identical dimensions, both have the contacts in the same place, but for some reason the + contact has swapped positions with a neutral contact in the change from 3 to 4. Both 3000 ma/h, physically fits in both phones, it's just that LG wanted to be able to sell batteries to all the loyal customers that upgraded from G3 to G4 rather than have an extra battery for their new flagship.

    11. Re:Translation by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      LG is planning on creating some sort of open ecosystem for third-party hardware. What exactly that means is yet to be seen...

      It means it will be like Apple... anyone is free to develop products for the proprietary, non interoperable interface, you just have to pay LG a nice fee to do so.

    12. Re: Translation by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      PCI
      USB3.0
      SD

    13. Re:Translation by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And you know this because you've consulted with LG about developing something?

    14. Re:Translation by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The third-party hardware has to interface with the phone -- and the software on it. That means all sorts of legal considerations. Probably licensing for each product -- can't have a rogue add-ons stealing mobile payment platform credentials or using phone features for nefarious purposes.

      No, I haven't talked to LG about a new "gamechanger" product I want to develop. But I also live in the land of reality where LG is a corporation looking to make money.

    15. Re:Translation by Mouldy · · Score: 1

      As a company who wants to develop some hardware to plug into people's phones, I want the most potential customers to be able to use my new hardware because it is very expensive to develop bespoke hardware and even more so if there are a bunch of competing platforms and my same piece of hardware needs to be rebuilt, re-certified & re-licensed 5 times for the top 5 device manufacturers.

      LG's market share is tiny, so it's going to be hard to justify developing something that can only ever be used on LG's products. Tiny market share + high development cost = nobody will develop for the platform.

      LG need developers. Developers need guarantees of a larger market share than LG can directly provide. The other manufacturers in the market will need to see a lot of hardware already developed for LG's interface before they'd consider implementing LG's interface vs creating their own proprietary interface.

      It's a bit of a catch 22. LG need to go all in with this one to make it stick; charging to develop on or to implement the interface will kill it before it starts. They need to make the standard free to develop & implement. Bring other manufacturers on board to define/shape the standard. Develop lots of addon hardware themselves and set the precedent that addon from manufacturer x can work with device from manufacturer y and that the money is in addon sales not in interface licensing fees.

      I think that's all a tall & costly order for a company that has such a small mobile business and frankly, I don't see it happening; which is a shame because LG do make good phones (disclaimer, I have an LG G4 and when compared to my old HTC...well, I can see why HTC's market share is tanking).

      So; I predict nothing exciting will come of this for LG. Best case scenario for LG is they corner some niche market by creating addons that estate agents in China just can't live without. In 5 years time, Samsung and Apple will have their own interfaces and those 2 interfaces will be the ones developers target for mass market.

  3. Why No Brown Title Bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's little question this is a sponsored post.

    Captcha: "bastard" -tee-hee

    1. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      There's little question this is a sponsored post.

      Sponsored? Hell, I found this summary in the Firehose and was about to mod it binspam, even though it had already been accepted. I think I'll head on back to the Firehose and do just that.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is relevant to my interests. This phone is almost perfect... Removable battery, SD card slot, excellent specs... The only remaining questions are over Qi wireless charging, cost and what the OS is like.

      Stock Android would be ideal... Anyone know what LG are like for updates?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      A bit mixed to be honest. The G4 was promised Marshmellow in October, and phones in Poland did get it then. But there might have been some issues as it seems to be taking forever for it to roll out to the rest of the world. At the moment more of the world doesn't have the update than does.

      That said the G4 is a brilliant phone. The only drawback is that it doesn't come with Qi charging as standard, but it is only a $5 sticker inside the back cover to add it.

    4. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to reply.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Review I wrote over on XDA after I had had the phone for a couple of weeks. Since then I have stuck a Qi sticker in it so I have wireless charging and after a 8 months the leather cover is now polished to a dark brown all the way round the edge.

      Morning All,

      Thought I would share my thoughts on the LG G4 after owning it for a month. I use the in a business environment where I will spend 2-4 hours per day talking on it, so my review will come from that perspective more that from a gaming perspective. It was this difference in usage pattern that I thought may interest people.

      Currently I have made no real changes to the setup of the device, it is still running stock everything and is a Telstra H815K model.

      The look and feel of the device is excellent and gives a real feel of quality. I went for the brown leather option and to date it is completely un-marked by any signs of wear. When I first picked up the phone I was really surprised by how light it was. It is not a small device but it feels very very light and initially it feels like you are holding a toy. I think if you were to hold another phone at the same time you could be forgiven for saying it felt cheap due to the lightness but away from other phones you soon forget that comparison and just appreciate the fact it doesn't weigh a tonne. And really, no one says a Macbook Air feels cheap because it's light.

      The leather back is a really really nice differential and I have had people ask what the case was and where they could get something similar. At only a month in I would expect a traditional back to still be pristine, but I had some concerns over the durability of the leather. Suffice to say that it looks exactly the same today as the day I got it. I will say though that my impressions of the black leather back were no where near as positive, as it had the look and feel of the fake leather patterning you often see on the inside of car doors.

      Physical layout of the phone works well and it sits well in my hand. The narrow bezel around the screen means the phone is physically small compared to others with the same viewing area, with the draw back that sometimes my pudgy palm can just cross over into the sensor area of the screen. This does only happen when I am playing a game in portrait mode with two hands though so the impacts are limited.

      I only have one criticism of the physical design and that is you cannot use the phone effectively if it is on a hard flat surface. This is due to the butt seam in the leather back acting as a pivot point and causing the phone to rock side to side. A usage case for me is to have the phone sitting on my desk and to type a text message on it. This is simply not possible with this phone.

      The screen is excellent. Colours are very well reproduced and the colour balance is one of the best I have come across. When I have done a colour balance comparison the phone comes up a little on the blue side. But that for me is a lot nicer than the yellow you see on most other phones. It is also no where near the saturation levels of Samsung. I get no light bleed or detectable changes in brightness or colour and if there are pixels there somewhere they are way too small for me to see :P

      Battery usage for me has been fine in most usage cases. By the end of the work day my phone is reporting that voice calls are using the same amount of battery as screen time, about 30%, and a full battery at 7am will be sitting around 35% come 6pm. In the evening though I have found that the battery will get annihilated by some of the games I am playing. Clash of Clans for example will chew 25%-30% of the battery per hour. That said those games smash my Nexus 9 as well.

      Even when I am playing games for extended periods, usually plugged into the mains, I don't find heat to ever be a problem. The phone gets a little warmer than ambient but nothing more. I'm not sure if that is a side effect of the leather back or if the phone actually does run pretty cool but this phone is noticeably coole

    6. Re: Why No Brown Title Bar? by dothasmurfysmurf · · Score: 1

      The G3 and G4 were both the first phones to market with lollipop and marshmallow respectively.

    7. Re: Why No Brown Title Bar? by dothasmurfysmurf · · Score: 2

      Oops, replied further down the thread for some reason. The G3 and G4 were both first to market with lollipop and marshmallow respectively. My G4 has survived a drop into a full bathtub, and when it got dropped and screen shattered, after I got there replacement screen it was a matter of removing 11 Phillips screws from the back plane, pulling off the bad display unit, and unhooking both cameras and the display connector. I had the new one installed, put together, and running in 7 minutes without having to consult instructions... I wish all phones were this simple to work on! I used Samsung from galaxy 1-4, but unless they give me a compelling reason to drop them LG is my go to manufacturer now and for the foreseeable future.

    8. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is relevant to my interests.

      "This is good information. It is definitely going in my favorites."

      Boy, this site is a shadow of its former glory.

    9. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. I would have bought a Nexus 6P already if it had Qi capability. That was a huge loss from the previous generation.

      Apart from the LG custom OS and updates issue, which in fairness doesn't seem that bad (compared to TouchWiz and HTC's crap), it seems like pretty much the perfect phone. If it hits the expected price it will be competitive with the Nexus 6P. Maybe they could even do a Play Edition.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G4 owner in Singapore. I got marshmellow a couple of weeks ago. Prior to that I had monthly security updates.

      The G4 has made me take a close look at LG products.

      I especially like the manual camera controls for my G4.

    11. Re:Why No Brown Title Bar? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I think they are great. Good enough that after I owned one for a couple of months my wife bought the same one based on my experience.

      You can get them for AU$500 which makes them one of the cheapest flagships.

  4. question: do you feel they're worth the money? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    I've got a smartphone...sure, it's great. But I can't honestly say that I feel I've gotten the upfront price plus the monthly fee's worth of utility/entertainment out of it.

    What's everyone else's experiences with smartphones?

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    1. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I feel that I get my money's worth.... but then I actually understand that $100 is nothing today, A lot of people don't or tell them it's worth something in an attempt to delude themselves to think they make a good wage... where in reality they are making almost nothing.... yes unless you are a burger flipper or store shelf stocker, you should be making $25 an hour at least.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re: question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Smartphones have kept me from boredom for innumerable hours and kept me employed by being connected at the right moments. Add to that saving me so much frustration and they are worth a lot. They don't cost any more than the price of buying a separate device to do all the same things.

      Now, I don't find all high end smartphones to be enough better than their competitors to be worth the price difference. Even some low end smartphones are fantastic. We live in remarkable times.

    3. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I've got a smartphone...sure, it's great. But I can't honestly say that I feel I've gotten the upfront price plus the monthly fee's worth of utility/entertainment out of it. What's everyone else's experiences with smartphones?

      I feel there's great utility in having a smartphone, but that I don't really care which one. I used to have an iPhone 4, but the screen broke and all the other phones were growing so I decided to get a really cheap-ass Motorola Moto E (4.3" screen) as a holdover and it doesn't impress but it also hasn't disappointed me. I'm also not a heavier user than that I'm on the lowest data use tier anyway, so it doesn't get any cheaper with a dumbphone. That said, Android 6.0 seems to bring some nice improvements and I don't expect my phone will ever see it, so I'm thinking maybe a compact/mini of this generation. It'll have to be a phone I can afford to lose though, I don't want a phone I worry about getting dropped or stolen or otherwise broken.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buy a reasonable smartphone phone, pay it up front so you don't get on the "subsidized treadmill", and a cheap pay-as-you-go plan, and you will find your monthly bill dropping by between half and 3/4. It's not like they have to be replaced at 2 years + 1 day.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      With root access, along with Linux Deploy and SSH/VNC client apps installed, I get my money's worth.

      I buy retro phones with HW keyboards. They feel more like a very portable linux pc that way. In the linux chroot environment, I can run any linux usermode app I want, run any system daemon I want, and muck about with custom mounted filesystems. (even mounting image files on the sdcard into useful places that are visible from android.)

      I bought my HTC Doubleshot second hand off ebay, and put a custom built cyanogenmod on it with some additional kernel modules (like binfmtmisc, zram, nfs, and pals) to make the chrooted linux more useful.

      I have gotten my money's worth.

    6. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      Very good point! Wages have definitely been low, stayed low, and probably decreased relative to actual cost of living.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    7. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The one I'm using now cost $30. I don't mean "$30 plus a two year contract", I mean that was the contractless cost of it. That's roughly what I paid for my last featurephone.

      One thing I've learned from the experience is that a cheap phone is generally going to be better than a hipster phone. The cheap phone will have buttons on it, something hipsters demand be removed on your $300-600 models because they, uh, destroy the fine lines of the phone or something? The cheap phone will have an SD card slot because it knows it doesn't come with enough memory, the hipster phone will assume 16Gb is enough for anyone. The cheap phone will have a long life removable battery because they're trying to sell to people with "You'll find this useful, and it's cheap!" rather than "This is the most exotic thing you will buy for three months, after which you'll throw it away and spend $300-600 on the next model."

      Weird, and not what I was expecting. And yeah, I like it and think it was totally worth $30.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

      What's everyone else's experiences with smartphones?

      I can communicate by text anywhere and everywhere... I am expected to do so, too.

      I can use the web anywhere and everywhere.

      I no longer get lost outdoors. I still get lost in large shopping malls and other large indoor places.

      I always have a decent compact camera with me.

      Podcasts, music and ebooks are invaluable whenever I have to sit and wait somewhere.

      (Of course, you can get all of these benefits by carrying a tablet, like an iPad Mini or a small Android tablet with you.)

    9. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I buy a top of the line iPhone every year and it gets used hard, for four years, by every member of my family. By the time four years are up and everyone has used it, it's largely obsolete in terms of performance due to operating system changes. At that point, I keep it around for another year mostly as a test platform for email connectivity on whatever the newest OS release it will run.

      So far, the hardware has held up. Only the 3GS had a problem with the up/down volume rocker button cover falling off, every other one has been fine other than the decline in battery capacity.

      As for value, that's highly dependent on your income and perception. I feel like I've gotten 4+ years of value out of it personally, but it's a minor expense relative to our income and about half of the cost is compensated by our employers, too. I work as a consultant, so it's my primary voice phone, supplies a good chunk of my internet access on the road, provides mapping and entertainment in the car, so I feel like I get a lot of overall value out of it.

    10. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I definitely do. Taking out of it the actual phoning component the always access to data where ever I go, the maps & navigation, the note taking, and access to useful apps as well as nice time eating games I would use it far more than say a PS4 which have the similar price upfront.

      As for the monthly cost, it will depend on your usage patterns for voice and data as to whether that is important. Because of my job I average 5 hours of talk time a day so I see the monthly cost as funding that.

    11. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      What's everyone else's experiences with smartphones?

      I have tried out a number of the low-medium end phones.

      Right now I am using a Moto E, which is locked to Virgin Mobile.

      It's a $40 at WalMart right now and 300h Voice and unmetered Data is $30 per month.

      It's a nice little phone, IMHO. Previously I was using a Nokia 535 on Virgin Mobile. It's another $40 phone but it runs Windows 8 Phone.

      Back when I wanted a mobile pocket computer but couldn't justify a monthly cell phone, I had an iPod Touch. It lasted a year (4th gen) before iOS updates obsoleted it. Also it had no storage upgrade option, and was tied to iTunes to sync. And it's home button got flaky toward the end. I've never had any other pocket mobile device have a problem with the main button.

    12. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      In the online reviews of the Moto E when it came out over a year ago, it was a $150 phone. It's a hell of a deal now on the pay-as-you-go providers because the price has settled to $40.

    13. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You've definitely gotten 4 years of value out of it if you've been able to use it to define peerage and hierarchy in your family. Little Jon, your youngest son, knows his place, and he'll probably turn out to be the nerd, since he always has to figure out ways around the aging problems in the fourth hand gadget.

    14. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by swb · · Score: 1

      He's also 11, so he doesn't even use the phone part, just the iPod part, and only when we go on vacation or long car trips so by then the small loss of battery capacity and performance issues really aren't a problem.

      The good part is that we've gotten four years out of a single handset.

      But I suspected this would troll somebody into jealousy of some kind, given the usual round of Slashdot postings that come out when smartphones are discussed and people trot out how they use the cheapest handset they can find on the cheapest pay as you go plan they can find. If that works for them, great, but it wouldn't work for me, and it doesn't have to.

    15. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I do buy a reasonable smartphone. $500 is very reasonable.

      Problem is most people that do not think that is reasonable try to justify why they are being underpaid. $15 an hour is the minimum anyone should make with current cost of living with a 15% yearly increase to keep in pace with inflation

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      After a bad experience with a 2 year contract with a phone that was only really good enough for 1 year (Android 2 days)
      I vowed never to pay for a contract that wasn't a monthly sim only plan.
      Saved up for and purchased a Nexus 4, still using it.
      Now that official support has ended I'm using CyanogenMod 13 (Android 6)
      It works.
      I use the thing endlessly, handy camera, social media, media player, tv, web browser.
      It's literally my only computing device now.
      Batteries a bit naff but at least with Android 6 it doesn't use much when you're not using it.

    17. Re:question: do you feel they're worth the money? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There are a lot cheaper and shittier phones than a Moto E that you can use on a pay-as-you-go plan. But the Moto E was only $40 and it's vastly better than the 3G and 4G iPod Touches that I own but no longer use. You should get your kid something that isn't crap that Apple has forced into obsolescence. Maybe even with a replaceable battery.

      Jealous of Apple crap?

      I have NetBSD installed on one of my SE/30's. It's a good use of Apple hardware.

      A cheap pay-as-you-go plan would work fine. But you'll never know. Keep flashing plastic at the Apple store if that makes you feel good.

  5. Can I replace the radio? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Because I'm really sick and tired of being forced to buy new phones every time I want to switch carriers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Can I replace the radio? by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      That shouldn't be the case any longer, if you look carefully. Certainly, my Nexus 6P is (allegedly) compatible with the standard carriers -- there's no carrier-specific version of the phone.

    2. Re:Can I replace the radio? by Computershack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because I'm really sick and tired of being forced to buy new phones every time I want to switch carriers.

      Seems to be only a situation that exists in the USA. Here in Europe at most we just have to unlock the phone to work with all carriers assuming its locket at all, shove a new SIM card from the new provider in the phone and turn it on.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    3. Re:Can I replace the radio? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      With the LTE phones that isn't the case anywhere I am aware of. Thre are many countries with incompatible 3G frequencies and standards, but that is a different issue.

    4. Re:Can I replace the radio? by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      The OnePlus Two is also compatible with all carriers. It's also half the price of most high-end smartphones.

    5. Re: Can I replace the radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xiaomi redmi note 2 120 $ and better than honor 7 and oneplus serie

    6. Re:Can I replace the radio? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Europe has two things going for it here. The first is that they've been careful allocating frequencies, and the second is that they've told the carriers that they have to agree on common standards and interoperable equipment (with "personal mobility" - that is, SIM cards.) The phone companies came up with the GSM family of standards (GSM, UMTS, and now LTE) and it all pretty much just works.

      The US didn't do any of this, partially because of lobbying by a certain semi-conductor/wireless research company, and partially because they didn't understand what Europe was doing, so we ended up with multiple conflicting standards and rather a lot of different frequency bands to run them on.

      This means that we have two nationwide carriers who run GSM family networks, plus two that run a mix of IS-95/2000 networks, that are finally implementing LTE, but not the rest of the GSM standards. As LTE is still to a certain extent in flux (there's something like three different ways to do voice, for instance) and LTE isn't nationwide yet, nobody can sell a simple device that works anywhere in the US. It's needlessly expensive to support both cdmaOne family standards and GSM family, and the carriers are still buying new swathes of spectrum that need hardware support.

      Which sucks.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Can I replace the radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think everyone supports LTE systems. Just to be safe, never go to Sprint as they're the laggard in that situation and Sprint seems to be the least liked network right now. Even a phone bought for Verizon now works with everyone else.

  6. great by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    yet another phone that requires a fucking degree in computer science to be able to make a call on!
    </Luddite>

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:great by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      yet another phone that requires a fucking degree in computer science to be able to make a call on!

      You use your phone to make calls with? How quaint.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    2. Re:great by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You jest, but we should stop making calls. They are unencrypted and leak lots of metadata. At least upgrade to Signal or something.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  7. Never say "QHD". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never say "QHD". Always use the correct term, which is "WQHD".

    The reason is because there is another resolution named "qHD" (meaning "quarter high definition") which is only 960x540.

    WQHD (or what some people confusingly call "QHD") is 2560x1440.

    Unfortunately, the confusion between "QHD" and "qHD" is now so severe that the only rational response now is to stop using the acronym. This is unfortunate, but the fault lies entirely with the marketing people and/or journalists who were just too slow to catch on that they were using the same term for two completely different things, and that it's unrealistic to expect that the uppercase/lowercase "Q/q" distinction could feasibly serve to differentiate them. (I know in theory it could, but this is the real world we're talking about here.) It's time to face facts that the "QHD"/"qHD" acronym is ruined, and to move on.

    1. Re:Never say "QHD". by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      Why use any bleeping letter acronym at all? How hard is it to just say "2560x1440"? Clear, unambiguous, and doesn't require a google search to understand.

    2. Re:Never say "QHD". by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      Clear, unambiguous, and doesn't require a google search to understand.

      Thats the answer, right there. Marketdroids are terrified that you might understand what you are buying. It is their worst nightmare, In fact, it makes you a terrorist!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  8. Is the magic slot specs open? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    I mean I could see third party peoples like Beltek making docking stations to attach the phone to TVs, or keyboard+monitor+mouse combo or interfaces to A/V receivers...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  9. Needs REAL system bus expansion by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    The phone ecosystem is in dire need of a REAL system bus expansion architecture.

    Android especially is based on linux (while iOS is based on MacOSX, which is based partly on BSD), which has baked in support for mixed CPU types, exotic memory technologies, and other goodies. A proper system bus implementation could get all that footwork brought to work for the device in question.

    Say for instance, another CPU, or added RAM, a different cellular modem (or satellite modem), an ethernet jack, perhaps even eSATA or a physical serial port.

    They could solve the driver/kernel module issue with an MTD squashfs with a digital signature on it, baked into each device. Contains the module source code and config script along with a vetted compiler binary. builds the module, then drops it in the system storage. Complies with GPL completely that way, and the end user doesnt need to see anything other than a "please wait while your device is configured." splash from android. (this mechanism is a security hole big enough to drive a bus through. Needs secure digital signature enforcement on the partition inside the device, read only partition in the device, and other such restrictions to avoid giving a mechanism to attackers with local access. This isnt necessarily a bad thing either. It means that a root user enabling card with dummy hardware could be put in the slot to give end users root access to their device. (contains dummy compile script, and copies SU, Busybox, and pals to the device) Sadly, it could be used by law enforcement for the same purposes. Using encrypting filesystems becomes important.)

    Existing drivers can be leveraged if the slot resembles an express card slot at the software level.

    If I were designing a slot architecture for android, this is the direction I would take anyway. (Just remember that a slot that can do anything truly useful (like add a GPU, add RAM, etc), needs access to the front side bus, which basically makes it a naked debug port through which law enforcement can insert their deeply coveted "magic keys". They can have their own little system on chip attached that shares the bus with the host cpu, and can do anything the host cpu does, for better or for worse. I dont consider that a good thing, but I dont see a solution, other than to just not have the port at all.)

    I like the idea of a standards based expansion port for cellphones that lets you add beefier hardware later. But to do that right, and keep it user friendly, you either need to distribute kernel modules over the store with crypto, or do what I proposed above, and have a naked access port to the system bus. (with all the danger that enables.)

    From a security standpoint, sandboxing/segregating the memory range associated with the slot and some other tricks might improve matters, by preventing DMA reads from devices sitting in that range from seeing main system memory, and requring active participation from the host cpu for data moves in and out, thus crippling "magic key" use, but it would also make it much harder to put certain kinds of hardware on the port.

    Kind of a curious thought experiment. How would you guys go about it?

    1. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      How would I do it? A bog standard USB3 port on the base of the phone combined with an easy to manufacture locking mechanism (e.g. modules can be made on a decent 3D printer) and an interface in the OS to support the necessary drivers to make whatever hardware gizmo you just crowdfunded actually work, if any. How would/will the phone manufacturers do it? Almost certainly something completely proprietary and tied up in IP patents/licenssing fees... which will then be reverse engineered anyway leading to cheap knock-off hardware and far from cheap lawsuits.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      USB (including 3.0) is still a polled-state system, requring the CPU to constantly talk with the ports.

      It's reasonably fast, and has a wide install base for devices, but not all devices lend themselves well to USB in a serious fashion. Specifically, you cannot really add RAM or a CPU over the USB bus, and things like USB serial ports are quirky beasts. Not to mention the penalties that the polled-state design of USB imposes if you want high speed disk drives attached.

      Most SoCs already resemble a mini internal PCI bus on phones. Giving a header to that should be reasonably simple, and would give a wider assortment of high power device capabilities than USB.

    3. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Damn right: I want a PCI slot so I can install a SCSI card - I need tape backup of my phone - NOW!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      All true, but a SoC bus is going to be vendor specific at best, and quite likely would need to be changed every couple of SoC generations; more than likely your peripherals will be vendor specific and probably only good for couple of phone generations, three at best. While technically it ought to be possible to come up with a standardised SoC bus socket that could be SoC agnostic, the chances of that happening any time soon are probably zero, so we would essentially have the proprietary solution I proposed for how the vendors might do it. USB3 isn't perfect either, but it can double up as a charging/dock/sync port saving space, could support any number of existing USB3 compatible peripherals, and would more readily open up the development of add-ons to the maker community using things like the Raspberry Pi and similar boards to make home-brew peripherals.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    5. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by swb · · Score: 1

      USB 3 is event driven and 2 and older were polled. USB 3 uses almost no CPU, you can pin a SSD drive at 90 MB/s on USB 3 and barely notice the CPU change. USB 2 would burn a third of the CPU at 30 MB/sec.

      For whatever its faults, 3 isn't really that bad for the performance it delivers. I've used gig NICs and SSDs off USB 3 without performance not noticeably different than PCIe NICs or SATA SSD. The latter are really only better at the outer limits of performance, not ordinary desktop workloads.

      3.1 will be even more interesting once it's more widely adopted. Whatever the successor to Sky Lake is will probably meet or exceed the 10 USB 3 port support it offers, but with 3.1 ports at 10 Gb/sec. You'd likely use an NVMe disk, but with 3.1 at 10 Gb/sec, it would almost make sense to put a native USB 3 interface on SSDs versus limiting them to SATA 6 Gb/sec speeds.

    6. Re:Needs REAL system bus expansion by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Children around here.. you just need a SCSI slot, none of this new-fangled PCI stuff.

      Anyway for tape backup ISA should suffice if you really need it onboard, or a DB-25 port to use a peripheral.

  10. Why is this getting past my ad blocker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot better be getting paid for these ads, to make up for people that leave because of them. I have thought about leaving because of all the "Stories" like this.

    1. Re: Why is this getting past my ad blocker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a new smartphone with a swappable battery and an expansion slot. Most slashdot users see these features as critical as it lets the phone last longer. So this article is indeed relevant to the /. Community. It may be advertising the phone, but it's still a good article that many /.ers have interest in.

      Besides its better than those "50% of woman make 20% less than 75% of men that work 20% more hours and take 10% less time off" articles we keep getting.

    2. Re: Why is this getting past my ad blocker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: /., as a site, isn't getting paid, but just maybe, someone got a little something on the side (maybe a new phone?) to let the pure binspam go through to FP. Probably something that will happen with some frequency until the new owners get more of a handle on things. Marketers are obviously taking advantage of the transition to ram through their spam.

      This Internets thing is getting worse and worse. /. has already gone down the commode. Stick a fork in it. It's done.

  11. A metal phone... by iampiti · · Score: 1

    A metal phone which keeps the removable battery. THAT is a feature I'd like some other phone manufacturers copying.
    I don't care much about metal, plastic is fine by me but since all flagships seem to going to metal it's nice that someone still gives you the posibility of changing the battery on your own.
    Also the expansion slot is a nice tech.

  12. Sold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MicroSD + removable battery + decent screen size and quality + decent camera = this could be sold by Satan himself and I'd still buy it, and this is coming from someone who is still using a mobile that's at least four years old.

    I don't care about the gimmicky add ons and such but even so I genuinely think I'll be grabbing one of these.

    1. Re:Sold. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, how many times have you replaced your battery in those four years?

      I'm still on a Nexus 5, no removable battery, no battery life issues. I find myself confused by this constant demand for a replaceable battery.

    2. Re:Sold. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Makes a lot of sense to replace the battery on e.g. a 10-year-old phone. I'm talking non-smart phones here, they seem to last for a long time if not subject to theft or loss.
      Smartphones are immature yet. No adequate software support, or perhaps you could use it long term as long as you don't log in to anything on the internet. 10 years support with weekly security updates would be acceptable.

    3. Re:Sold. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If you're investing in a phone for a decade, I can understand the need to simply replace the limited life parts.

      I'm clearly a 1%er, I expect a new toy every couple of years (although I'm also picky, hence still being on the original Nexus 5).

    4. Re:Sold. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I'm not really buying phones for a decade (though the dumb phone might last quite long) but in the near future I think the useful lifetime of hardware will only increase. E.g. a 10-year-old desktop is now a Core 2 Duo beast with 2GB RAM and its performance is still current, if not for slight inconvenience such as software video decoding and booting time of more than 20 seconds.
      What when the low end smartphones have 64bit and 4GB RAM? :) (ok, rather 2GB)

      Asking for a 10-year OS on a smartphone is a bit of mindless provocation but eventually more people will forget that phone needs be replaced much often (barring hardware failure or thinking replacing broken or scratched glass is not worth the hassle or expense). An early example might be the iPhone 4S : it's nearing 5 years and still supported.

    5. Re:Sold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I have the same phone (LG G3). I bought 2 spare batteries with external chargers. I pull the battery and insert a fresh, charged battery at least once, maybe twice, every single day.

      Batteries wearing out and needing replaced, yeah that's one issue. But also consider this: I use my phone a lot. A LOT. The battery will never last a whole day with multiple hours of screen-on-time. I also hate using my phone while it's plugged in. The cord gets in the way while I'm holding the phone, and it puts stress on the charging port and the cord so they wear out more quickly. Wireless charging, as far as I am aware, still requires you put the phone down on a special surface. Not possible if you want to keep holding the phone and using it.

      So how can you charge your phone without ever putting it down, or dealing with the annoyance of a cord? Swap batteries. Pop the old battery out, charge it externally, and put a new charged battery in. Instantly back to 100%. I have had phones where the USB port wore out from holding the phone while plugged in. I have had phones that charged ridiculously slowly with a USB cord, or would not even charge AT ALL while using Google Maps because it used too much power and the charger couldn't keep up. These phones were unusable unless I stopped using it long enough for it to charge, or I swapped the batteries out. All Samung phones, btw. Now Samsung wants to get rid of swappable batteries, and they think I will buy it? Fuck no, not gonna happen! LG seems to be making the phone I need, these days..

  13. Still rocking my G3 by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    I'm normally an aggressive tech upgrader but didn't see anything in the G4 worthy of an upgrade and these G5 specs don't excite me either.

    1. Re:Still rocking my G3 by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      A fellow LG G3er here. It's a nice phone, and the d855 has a stable Cyanogenmod release for it now. Removable battery, expandable SD card slot (I have a 128GB expansion!). Can't see myself switching away from it for a long time.

    2. Re:Still rocking my G3 by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I went from a G2 to a G4 and my wife from a G3 to a G4. From the G3 to G4 the primary reason to make the move is the quality of the camera. The G3s camera was never that crash hot and was beaten hands down by the Samsung S4. The G4s camera though is very good, especially in low light situations. Given I have two little ones and a wife that likes to chronicle every step of their lives in photo format the g4 camera was enough for her. But this happened after I had had mine for 6 weeks and she had played with it a lot.

    3. Re:Still rocking my G3 by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      The G4 was too big for me. Even the G3 barely fits in my pocket but the G4 is even bigger. It's basically a phablet.

    4. Re:Still rocking my G3 by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      There really is almost nothing between them when it comes to size. The G4 is 2mm wider and 2mm longer and 1mm thicker....
      G3 146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 mm
      G4 148.9 x 76.1 x 9.8 mm

  14. ExpressCard for Android? by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    We heard a lot of talk about phones that can be built up like LEGOs, and now this phone has one card slot of some kind. Maybe what we need is a standard (that 10% of the phones would adopt) for an expansion slot. The trick would be standard device drivers, as that would mean a major rewrite of Android, and only Google can do that.

    1. Re:ExpressCard for Android? by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

      1. Of course the expansion slot would not be ExpressCard; It would be a different serial interface, possibly with a way to rapidly read and write to the SD Card or to the internal flash memory.

      2. We already have a universal expansion slot: USB! The problem is that almost no phone manufacturer will build in a USB-A-Female connector and a decent power supply. (If only ZeroLemon would build such a thing into one of their cases, and provide a firmware update to make it useful.)

  15. Updates by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    Top of the line hardware with bottom of the barrel firmware updates. Im betting you will be lucky to get 1 update for the two years they expect you to own this phone and zero updates after 2 years. Meanwhile your Google nexus phone has monthly updates for a good 4 years.

    1. Re:Updates by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Well the Lg G2 started on Jellybean and got both the Kitkat and Lollipop releases. Rumour is saying Marshmellow will roll once it has hit the g4.

    2. Re: Updates by dothasmurfysmurf · · Score: 1

      My G4 has been running the OTA marshmallow update since early January.

    3. Re: Updates by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Where abouts are you? I know it has hit Poland, South Korea and a few places in Europe. I also think they were rolling it out in Canada in Jan so perhaps that is yours. I don't currently have it in Australia.

  16. $125 phone got me a college degree by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I typically spend about $125 to get a phone similar to what cost $600 a year prior, and I spend $25/month with Boost mobile.

    Right now, I'm in the car, waiting 10 minutes while my wife runs into the store. Normally when I have to wait a few minutes, I spend the time studying on my phone. While I'm driving I listen to lectures I downloaded to my phone. Between listening while driving amd reading or writing while waiting, I get about an hour of school done per day, using time that would otherwise be wasted.

  17. Bigger battery by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    People go for higher and higher specs, and the batteries don't keep up. My phone is a tool, not a fashion accessory. I don't go after flash. Never had a screen protector or case. But I never drop it either. When not being used, it's in my belt case, not gripped in my hand so everyone can see that stupid bite-out-of-an-apple logo ;) I've had 3 smartphones since 2010. Dell Streak 5, Galaxy Note1, and Huawei Ascend Mate2 that I've had almost 2 years now. Not the high end spec device, but the screen is clear, it's got NO lag, fast, great camera and a battery that lasts TWO DAYS with about 20-30% battery left. 4,050mAH battery, THAT was what sold me on this. Faster processors and higher density brighter screens eat up the batteries. You don't need a super duper processor and a bunch of flash to have a good user experience. Smartphones are the "toaster oven" now days. Flash is about all they have left to sell. They all look the same and do the same thing. When the Nexus6 came out, a coworker got one. We put the SAME apps on both devices. Rebooted, and waited 2 minutes for them to settle down. Ran the same apps on each device at the same time. Wink of an eye difference, but not at DOUBLE the price. He sent it back and got something else. He said for what I use it for, I'll never use it to the potential, especially not at double what I paid for the Mate2. People today want instant gratification. Gotta "have" the newest processor, the newest OS. Then 3-4 months later something new comes out and they just gotta have the newest again. Hey, as long as the manufacturers can get away with the fact that consumers are economic idiots, why not.

  18. chaussure nike tn requin 2016 by shenhuihan · · Score: 0

    timberland Homme backward production capacity, a total of 4770 acres of land space. at the same time, the main center of the town, the functional areas have to speed up the construction and upgrading of Industrial Technology Park, has been identified as the 71 batch of two municipal characteristics of Industrial Science and Technology Park, covering 80% of the town, Yongjia County, on the original industrial layout successfully created 11 city level characteristics of Industrial Science and Technology Park, has become the city with the largest number of Municipal Industrial Science and technology park. As of now, the city's laser and optoelectronics, electrical, pump valve and other ten major strategic emerging industries, massive economy has begun to take shape.

  19. Can we learn from it? by batistuta · · Score: 1

    This is the main reason why US customers keep paying so much for their contracts and is so difficult to change carriers. The only carrier supporting the European (and actually most worldwide carrier models) is T-mobile. If you live in an area with a decent T-Mobile coverage, I'd suggest people to switch to them and vote with their SIM cards. Maybe other carriers would follow up.

  20. Magic Slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fnarr Fnarr.

  21. Always One by phorm · · Score: 1

    "The aluminum unibody G5 brings with it a 5.3-inch QHD display with an Always One mode"

    So I was confused as to what "Always One" was about, but apparently that's just a typo of Always-On. A better description is here, where apparently the display can stay on using 0.8% battery/h due to not being tied to the primary processor.

    Sounds neat, although I'd still like to see a phone that tries something like a hybrid e-paper display or something of the like

  22. Letdown by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I dig that LG is using the slot to allow them to create 1 base phone and allow the end user to pick the guts inside of it... but I worry that this will lead us down the road of manufacturers creating expensive sub-par devices, and then forcing us to buy a bunch of "PLUS" or "Premium" expansions bring the phone up to a respectable spec.