With all due respect, the monkey-filled rectum scenario is at least as plausible as the submitted story.
And in a parallel universe, it may even be the most logical one. Just like, in most parallel universes, Donald Trump is not president. Unfortunately, in the "infinite worlds" scenario, it's guaranteed that anything that could happen, would happen in at least one universe. We just happen to be in "that" universe - the one with the planet that intelligent life avoids at all cost.
So if you use your banking app to pay the rent, the bank is going to have to fork over 30% to Apple? Even though the payment doesn't go through Apple? I call bullshit.
Nobody cares about your excuses for making mistakes. Nobody. Not even me. We already know that your problem is that you can't get laid. Maybe it's because you're doing a LOT wrong.
Here's a clue - most women watching you bash trans-women will find you obnoxious. With the exception of old, dried-up TERFs, women tend to show solidarity with us. It's the men who more often have to be beaten with a cluestick. For some reason, many deep down see us as traitors for giving up male privilege. And you're too stupid to realize you're being trolled (same as most suckers when I was trolling under my former name).
Come on, fess up, you LIKE the abuse. At least it's attention of some sort. It's why you continually seek it out. And you can't deny you're the instigator in every case. I'm not the one going after you for your being an obese slob who can't get laid.
What can I say - "silly rabbit, twitter is for twits"? I really don't get what all the fuss is about. I know why news media follows it - it's cheaper than doing any real reporting, same as all those stupid youtube videos that they "report" on - in the news!!!???WTF Pretty much the definition of "fake news", because of financial cutbacks. In all seriousness, people need to take what happens on the internet less seriously. It's not real,
There's plenty of research that has shown the connection between excessive social media use and mental illness. Look no further than President Cheetos. Those who think it has any real effect in the real world are deluded - it only affects you if you let it.
If you pretend to swallow the bait for a while, then ask why they're so interested in what's (not) in my panties rather than the current topic of discussion, they don't really have an answer. And when they continue, "can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger" - as they're doing in the case of Chelsea Manning - has no effective response. Kind of deprives them of the lulz and makes what they thought were tiny victories into "turdles".
That's why they keep on trying. They're pitiful.
As for Briana Wu, she pretends to be a feminist to hide the fact that she used to be a guy. It's an old trick, and it hasn't improved with age. Pretty much the essence of internalized transphobia and self-hate. We saw that with the Q and A a while back. She doesn't represent the typical transsexual who, once outed, suddenly finds that their biggest worry - that they'll be outed - is gone. No more waiting for the other shoe to drop, and a lot more freedom to speak your mind without worrying you'll say to much and give yourself away.
The trolls will never get it - but others will, including others who are currently living in fear of being found out. I've seen it happen, and it's a GOOD THING (tm):-P
You used the term vulva, idiot. That's external. Or did you fail biology like you failed everything else.
BTW - "you don't even write like a woman" is a load of crap. How is a woman supposed to write? With all deference to male privilege? Too weak and fearful to call out bullshitters like you? All emotional and hysterical, no logic or facts? "Knowing our place?" Here's a news flash - those "good ole days" are long gone, and never coming back, you dumb hick. With that remark you've shown that women are the great unknown in your life. As I said, it was expected - your personality is the perfect contraceptive.
The real question is why you, and people like you, insist on going on and on about gender transition when the story is about intelligence leaks and the subsequent pardon. My guess? You know deep down that what Chelsea Manning did was morally and ethically right, and that you would never have the guts to do it. Hence the side-tracking.
The trolls may be "getting their entertainment", but it's backfiring wrt society in general (plus I derive a certain entertainment myself catching them in their contradictions and lies - gotta keep the grey matter active with new challenges). The fact that they're always being openly challenged nowadays shows how times have changed. They are losing traction at a tremendous rate - to the point where the only real emotional response they generate (at least with me) is laughter at their pitiful state.
And that's one thing trolls can't stand - failing to generate any really visceral emotional reaction that they can play on. That they want to make the focus on Manning's gender transition instead of the real story turns out to be useful - it shows that they don't feel that they can exploit Manning's actions because even they recognize that she has the moral high ground, and once again shines a spotlight on bigotry. Both of these are good things. About time the internet did something positive:-)
Chelsea Manning is looking... but it may have problem getting references.
"It"? Oh how clever! But the 2018 mid-term elections are coming, with all 435 house representatives and 34 senators up for election. There are plenty of people who would vote for her because they believe that her actions were necessary because of the egregious conduct of the US wrt foreign and military policy, which harmed the nation's interests as well as needlessly and futilely endangering military service personnel.
Now as for the question of where to find Jobs - google says he's buried at Alta Mesa Memorial Park, Palo Alto, California, United States. Was that so hard?
The original poster claimed Chelsea Manning was "sexually confused", not "gender confused." The confusion started in their mind, not anyone else's. It's like the ones calling transsexuals faggots. Some are straight, some are bi, some are gay, some are lesbian, some are asexual. Nowadays who cares - except ignorant people like the poster I was replying to. I certainly don't.
It's not like there's a right choice and a wrong choice - because there is no "choice" involved, just a dawning realization that you accept, embrace, and extend:-)
Slashdot isn't the place it used to be, back when I was trolling the trolls under my birth name. Today the trolls are lame. Still, once in a while they'll raise a point that needs to be thought through so that it can be quickly and properly smacked down in the future... so why not? It's not like they're capable of embarrassing me or anything.
And the idiots posting fake pictures of me, well, anyone interested can find real pictures of me as well as news clips, etc. So again, what, me worry?
And it's impossible to dox me - I already published my home address, etc., just to show that it really doesn't change anything when Briana Wu was making up lies about being doxxed, etc. People seem to forget that we had these things called phone books that contained everyone's name, address, and phone number and everyone survived.
Kind of hard to harm someone who is impossible to embarrass, who has no secrets (except passwords and PIN numbers), and has been attacked by the far better trolls of the days of Slashdot's glory, and cut their teeth trolling on USENET.:-)
You may have noticed that every once in a while, one or another of the trans women will also throw in their two cents - we really have nothing to be ashamed of, and we're becoming bolder about it every day. So the more they throw rocks, the more it indirectly helps the cause.
Besides, the current generation of trolls just doesn't get it. For example, they can't do subtlety. Or lay the groundwork for 6 months before the great chain yanking. They're like Donald Trump - incompetent.
Also (see original subject line above) who cares about someone's sexual orientation any more? Straight, gay, lesbian, cisgender or transgender, if people were to boycott all the businesses that support us, they'd have almost nowhere to shop. So really, what if, instead of being a transsexual woman, I was a gay man? Or a lesbian? Just what do they think would be wrong with that anyway?
Back on topic - they are concentrating on Chelsea Manning's identity, and not her actions, because her actions are believed to be justified by many people in many countries. The "my country, right or wrong" days are long gone.
They also don't want to understand that transition isn't a choice - it's what you do when you realize that you have no choice. This whole "she chose to get a sex change to get out of prison early" is a serious misrepresentation. If she had wanted to get out early, or maybe even avoid being tried, all she had to do was agree to give them everything about Assange. There's lots of people with a hard-on against Assange and Wikileaks. Mostly, people who have been exposed for wrong-doing.
If she ever decides to go into politics...:-) After all, anyone has to be better than Trump.
Oh, I WANT to encourage them. Embolden them to be as out in their hate as they can be - it's the best way to expose them for what they are, rather than having people give them the benefit of the doubt.
They can't hurt me. What are they going to do - out me? Already been done, and it was a mostly positive experience, both on the net and in real life. In the end, they can't hurt anyone except those who live in places where it's legal to discriminate against transsexuals. And the only way to change that is to so embolden them that the general public sees the haters for what they are and gets enraged enough to demand that the law be changed. Us asking to change it won't work - we just don't have the numbers. Transgenders are a minority, and transsexuals an even smaller and more vulnerable minority.
Yet another lie. YOU'RE the one who made reference to genitalia (external primary sex characteristics) here. In my reply I made the distinction quite clear. A working neoclitoris is not a vulva. And it's certainly not external.
The reason it's so easy to transform is that both the penis and the clitoris start out as the same organ in the human fetus.
Not the same thing. Your mother didn't give you birth - the surgeon did. Your mother would have most likely produced a dead fetus - hence the c-section.
The woman who gets a cesarean has no more "given birth" than a clone taken out of a tank would be (and we've come a ways on that). If ANYONE "gave birth" to the child, is was the medical team who performed the cesarean;. The woman was incapable of giving birth. So while the child was given birth, it was by the doctors, not the woman. The child would have died before birth otherwise, and you can hardly call pushing out a corpse "giving birth."
Look at how many of you h8ters have to hide your identities, because you know that there would be real-world consequences if you came out of the closet with your bigotry against trans-women. Job loss is a real risk, because you would create a toxic work environment.
And no, you keep confusing us with drag queens and cross-dressers. They're the ones going around in pink frilly clothes as part of their sexual fantasies. Today it's t-shirt, shorts, and runners, same as most women, because it's frigging hot!. Stared at? Only by horny men - it's not like they can tell my past by looking.
One day you'll slip up, and there WILL be consequences. Not that I really give a shit - I'm secure enough in who I am that I've done news interviews on tv and radio, and I go by my legal name here, unlike you.
Wrong. One of the definitions of insanity is irrationality. Someone who expects to have a different outcome while repeating the same action over and over again is irrational. In other words, delusional, experiencing a break with reality - in their world, cause and effect don't work in a sane fashion. That's the opposite of sane. So eat it, moron.
Guess what? If she produced a viable egg, she wasn't really post-menopausal, was she? If she didn't produce the egg, she isn't the mother. Just a host or surrogate. Same as if you ever get lucky, you'll just be a sperm donor, because nobody would want to spend years raising a child with you.
Nobody is trying to "dictate your thoughts and actions," except when they exceed socially accepted norms. Same as if you think you're entitled to steal, you'll find that society can in fact dictate your actions. Heck, even stop signs and red lights dictate your actions. So why is it acceptable that inanimate objects, that don't have any sentience, can demand respect, but humans can't?
You're not a special snowflake. You don't get to promote hatred without consequences.
The lying fool once again demonstrates his total ignorance of the topic:
Much in the same, surgery can't make a penis into a vulva. That isn't a hateful comment, it's just stating a fact.
The penis isn't surgically transformed into a vulva, but a working clitoris. Moron. You've just proven you don't even know the difference between a vulva and a clit. Still a virgin, I see. Must be your lack of personality that keeps women away. Smart women!
Slashdot Mirror
With all due respect, the monkey-filled rectum scenario is at least as plausible as the submitted story.
And in a parallel universe, it may even be the most logical one. Just like, in most parallel universes, Donald Trump is not president. Unfortunately, in the "infinite worlds" scenario, it's guaranteed that anything that could happen, would happen in at least one universe. We just happen to be in "that" universe - the one with the planet that intelligent life avoids at all cost.
So if you use your banking app to pay the rent, the bank is going to have to fork over 30% to Apple? Even though the payment doesn't go through Apple? I call bullshit.
Here's a clue - most women watching you bash trans-women will find you obnoxious. With the exception of old, dried-up TERFs, women tend to show solidarity with us. It's the men who more often have to be beaten with a cluestick. For some reason, many deep down see us as traitors for giving up male privilege. And you're too stupid to realize you're being trolled (same as most suckers when I was trolling under my former name).
Come on, fess up, you LIKE the abuse. At least it's attention of some sort. It's why you continually seek it out. And you can't deny you're the instigator in every case. I'm not the one going after you for your being an obese slob who can't get laid.
What can I say - "silly rabbit, twitter is for twits"? I really don't get what all the fuss is about. I know why news media follows it - it's cheaper than doing any real reporting, same as all those stupid youtube videos that they "report" on - in the news!!!???WTF Pretty much the definition of "fake news", because of financial cutbacks. In all seriousness, people need to take what happens on the internet less seriously. It's not real,
There's plenty of research that has shown the connection between excessive social media use and mental illness. Look no further than President Cheetos. Those who think it has any real effect in the real world are deluded - it only affects you if you let it.
If you pretend to swallow the bait for a while, then ask why they're so interested in what's (not) in my panties rather than the current topic of discussion, they don't really have an answer. And when they continue, "can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger" - as they're doing in the case of Chelsea Manning - has no effective response. Kind of deprives them of the lulz and makes what they thought were tiny victories into "turdles".
That's why they keep on trying. They're pitiful.
As for Briana Wu, she pretends to be a feminist to hide the fact that she used to be a guy. It's an old trick, and it hasn't improved with age. Pretty much the essence of internalized transphobia and self-hate. We saw that with the Q and A a while back. She doesn't represent the typical transsexual who, once outed, suddenly finds that their biggest worry - that they'll be outed - is gone. No more waiting for the other shoe to drop, and a lot more freedom to speak your mind without worrying you'll say to much and give yourself away.
The trolls will never get it - but others will, including others who are currently living in fear of being found out. I've seen it happen, and it's a GOOD THING (tm) :-P
You used the term vulva, idiot. That's external. Or did you fail biology like you failed everything else.
BTW - "you don't even write like a woman" is a load of crap. How is a woman supposed to write? With all deference to male privilege? Too weak and fearful to call out bullshitters like you? All emotional and hysterical, no logic or facts? "Knowing our place?" Here's a news flash - those "good ole days" are long gone, and never coming back, you dumb hick. With that remark you've shown that women are the great unknown in your life. As I said, it was expected - your personality is the perfect contraceptive.
The real question is why you, and people like you, insist on going on and on about gender transition when the story is about intelligence leaks and the subsequent pardon. My guess? You know deep down that what Chelsea Manning did was morally and ethically right, and that you would never have the guts to do it. Hence the side-tracking.
You're so transparent it's pitiful.
The trolls may be "getting their entertainment", but it's backfiring wrt society in general (plus I derive a certain entertainment myself catching them in their contradictions and lies - gotta keep the grey matter active with new challenges). The fact that they're always being openly challenged nowadays shows how times have changed. They are losing traction at a tremendous rate - to the point where the only real emotional response they generate (at least with me) is laughter at their pitiful state.
And that's one thing trolls can't stand - failing to generate any really visceral emotional reaction that they can play on. That they want to make the focus on Manning's gender transition instead of the real story turns out to be useful - it shows that they don't feel that they can exploit Manning's actions because even they recognize that she has the moral high ground, and once again shines a spotlight on bigotry. Both of these are good things. About time the internet did something positive :-)
"You cannot moderate a thread that you've commented in" so here's a virtual +1 Funny, +1 Insightful, and +1 Lulz.
Chelsea Manning is looking... but it may have problem getting references.
"It"? Oh how clever! But the 2018 mid-term elections are coming, with all 435 house representatives and 34 senators up for election. There are plenty of people who would vote for her because they believe that her actions were necessary because of the egregious conduct of the US wrt foreign and military policy, which harmed the nation's interests as well as needlessly and futilely endangering military service personnel.
Now as for the question of where to find Jobs - google says he's buried at Alta Mesa Memorial Park, Palo Alto, California, United States. Was that so hard?
The original poster claimed Chelsea Manning was "sexually confused", not "gender confused." The confusion started in their mind, not anyone else's. It's like the ones calling transsexuals faggots. Some are straight, some are bi, some are gay, some are lesbian, some are asexual. Nowadays who cares - except ignorant people like the poster I was replying to. I certainly don't.
It's not like there's a right choice and a wrong choice - because there is no "choice" involved, just a dawning realization that you accept, embrace, and extend :-)
Slashdot isn't the place it used to be, back when I was trolling the trolls under my birth name. Today the trolls are lame. Still, once in a while they'll raise a point that needs to be thought through so that it can be quickly and properly smacked down in the future ... so why not? It's not like they're capable of embarrassing me or anything.
And the idiots posting fake pictures of me, well, anyone interested can find real pictures of me as well as news clips, etc. So again, what, me worry?
And it's impossible to dox me - I already published my home address, etc., just to show that it really doesn't change anything when Briana Wu was making up lies about being doxxed, etc. People seem to forget that we had these things called phone books that contained everyone's name, address, and phone number and everyone survived.
Kind of hard to harm someone who is impossible to embarrass, who has no secrets (except passwords and PIN numbers), and has been attacked by the far better trolls of the days of Slashdot's glory, and cut their teeth trolling on USENET. :-)
You may have noticed that every once in a while, one or another of the trans women will also throw in their two cents - we really have nothing to be ashamed of, and we're becoming bolder about it every day. So the more they throw rocks, the more it indirectly helps the cause.
Besides, the current generation of trolls just doesn't get it. For example, they can't do subtlety. Or lay the groundwork for 6 months before the great chain yanking. They're like Donald Trump - incompetent.
Also (see original subject line above) who cares about someone's sexual orientation any more? Straight, gay, lesbian, cisgender or transgender, if people were to boycott all the businesses that support us, they'd have almost nowhere to shop. So really, what if, instead of being a transsexual woman, I was a gay man? Or a lesbian? Just what do they think would be wrong with that anyway?
Back on topic - they are concentrating on Chelsea Manning's identity, and not her actions, because her actions are believed to be justified by many people in many countries. The "my country, right or wrong" days are long gone.
They also don't want to understand that transition isn't a choice - it's what you do when you realize that you have no choice. This whole "she chose to get a sex change to get out of prison early" is a serious misrepresentation. If she had wanted to get out early, or maybe even avoid being tried, all she had to do was agree to give them everything about Assange. There's lots of people with a hard-on against Assange and Wikileaks. Mostly, people who have been exposed for wrong-doing.
If she ever decides to go into politics ... :-) After all, anyone has to be better than Trump.
Oh, I WANT to encourage them. Embolden them to be as out in their hate as they can be - it's the best way to expose them for what they are, rather than having people give them the benefit of the doubt.
They can't hurt me. What are they going to do - out me? Already been done, and it was a mostly positive experience, both on the net and in real life. In the end, they can't hurt anyone except those who live in places where it's legal to discriminate against transsexuals. And the only way to change that is to so embolden them that the general public sees the haters for what they are and gets enraged enough to demand that the law be changed. Us asking to change it won't work - we just don't have the numbers. Transgenders are a minority, and transsexuals an even smaller and more vulnerable minority.
Yet another lie. YOU'RE the one who made reference to genitalia (external primary sex characteristics) here. In my reply I made the distinction quite clear. A working neoclitoris is not a vulva. And it's certainly not external.
The reason it's so easy to transform is that both the penis and the clitoris start out as the same organ in the human fetus.
Not the same thing. Your mother didn't give you birth - the surgeon did. Your mother would have most likely produced a dead fetus - hence the c-section.
The woman who gets a cesarean has no more "given birth" than a clone taken out of a tank would be (and we've come a ways on that). If ANYONE "gave birth" to the child, is was the medical team who performed the cesarean;. The woman was incapable of giving birth. So while the child was given birth, it was by the doctors, not the woman. The child would have died before birth otherwise, and you can hardly call pushing out a corpse "giving birth."
Look at how many of you h8ters have to hide your identities, because you know that there would be real-world consequences if you came out of the closet with your bigotry against trans-women. Job loss is a real risk, because you would create a toxic work environment.
And no, you keep confusing us with drag queens and cross-dressers. They're the ones going around in pink frilly clothes as part of their sexual fantasies. Today it's t-shirt, shorts, and runners, same as most women, because it's frigging hot!. Stared at? Only by horny men - it's not like they can tell my past by looking.
One day you'll slip up, and there WILL be consequences. Not that I really give a shit - I'm secure enough in who I am that I've done news interviews on tv and radio, and I go by my legal name here, unlike you.
Life is a 2-way street, and you don't get to be a deviant without consequences.
Ture - but now that the pendulum has shifted, it's those who hate on transsexuals who are the deviants. Enjoy your consequences.
You missed my follow-up - they did NOT give birth. They had to have c sections because they could not give birth. Idiot.
Wrong. One of the definitions of insanity is irrationality. Someone who expects to have a different outcome while repeating the same action over and over again is irrational. In other words, delusional, experiencing a break with reality - in their world, cause and effect don't work in a sane fashion. That's the opposite of sane. So eat it, moron.
Also, she had a c-section because she could NOT give birth. Tsk tsk.
Guess what? If she produced a viable egg, she wasn't really post-menopausal, was she? If she didn't produce the egg, she isn't the mother. Just a host or surrogate. Same as if you ever get lucky, you'll just be a sperm donor, because nobody would want to spend years raising a child with you.
Nobody is trying to "dictate your thoughts and actions," except when they exceed socially accepted norms. Same as if you think you're entitled to steal, you'll find that society can in fact dictate your actions. Heck, even stop signs and red lights dictate your actions. So why is it acceptable that inanimate objects, that don't have any sentience, can demand respect, but humans can't?
You're not a special snowflake. You don't get to promote hatred without consequences.
The lying fool once again demonstrates his total ignorance of the topic:
Much in the same, surgery can't make a penis into a vulva. That isn't a hateful comment, it's just stating a fact.
The penis isn't surgically transformed into a vulva, but a working clitoris. Moron. You've just proven you don't even know the difference between a vulva and a clit. Still a virgin, I see. Must be your lack of personality that keeps women away. Smart women!
How soon we forget. I'll say the same thing I said then - you were caught - fuck you, liar.
Gotcha! The murder rate for white female transsexuals is lower than female non-transsexuals. Explain away that.