Where in the article does it mention that surveillance was used? It seems like the evidence gathered so far was publicly published (Facebook), found in his car after detaining him on suspicion of "prowling", or from interviews with the suspect.
There are those with legitimate needs as well- MS, palsy, seizures, etc
Previous study I read pointed to a correlated drop in IQ was 4 points (average) for low habitual use and 8 points (average) for high habitual use. Sorry I don't have the link immediately available, otherwise I'd I look up the size of that study as well.
You personal gun will never be effective against a nation state, they have tanks.
When tanks are deployed they have to be effectively supported with infantry, otherwise opposing infantry can outflank the tank and hit it from unexpected angles. Check out the Soviet war in Afghanistan.
APCs seem way more relevant nowadays. Even then, they aren't the end-all-be-all of warfare.
I don't advocate overthrowing government, but having small-arms enables a populace access to greater armaments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"around 50% of them end up back in terrorist camps"
Not every person in gitmo is a terrorist and the number that get released, that then decide to become (or continue being) terrorists is not general knowledge.
They have been at it for a while. IIRC they recently upgraded the floating point address spaces to 64bit so that the "levels" could be larger than the ~8km.
They're also working a lot on the net code and (dynamic) instancing system.
There are court battles happening today because people were made aware of the issue. One of the criteria to open a case is to prove that there is an injured party. That was not a possibility before Snowden because all proof was considered "secret".
Yes, Binney, Drake, and Meyer were all people that got punished for doing the right thing. Yes, there were people in the public that toed the party line of "the US doesn't torture", then following up with "waterboarding isn't torture and is legal because the White House counsel (but not the Attorney General) says so".
I don't understand this concept that someone is a fool for trying to right a wrong by making the the wrong known. Is it because he'll undoubtedly have a harder life? That's not foolish if he made the decision knowing that his life would be harder, which he does. There are many people that would do so (see other whistleblowers, aid workers, emergency workers, etc).
I agree that it will take a sea change in order to make long term changes to society. However for that to occur society needs to be made aware of the problem, which is being done by whistleblowers.
The whole point of having whistleblower laws is that some information DOES need to be known by the public. The difference between the information ES released and a "nuclear scientist" releasing information is that one is actionable and the other isn't. Edward Snowden didn't release information on individuals in the field or information on how to make the surveillance technologies used.
What do you think of the Church Committee? The NSA has overstepped before and been reigned in. It takes time and it takes the will to reverse the idiotic course we've been on.
Government overreach will go away and come back. It happens, but that doesn't mean we have to tolerate it.
Sounds better than the method studied in 2013- having gold nano-rods injected into the testes and only lasting a few months.
http://www.rsc.org/chemistrywo...
Depends- you could have a minimum wage job that pays just enough to make rent, a second job to pay for food and clothing, and you have you take the bus to get everywhere. In such circumstances it can be hard to show up to the polls; employers can't force you to stay, but the money you need can.
I believe the logic behind it is that solar installations, which are considered competitors to energy companies, require batteries and the cheaper or more effective that batteries are the more competitive solar becomes.
I tend think it's a combination of issues.
Some can be offset or fixed by teaching women differently (negotiation for more money), some possibly can be offset through a combination of law and working with their employers (maternity leave), but prejudice is the bug bear that's so hard to fix since it raises hackles (putting some on the defensive), is hard to teach & is misattributed as the cause when it's actually a different cause.
What "regular hospital"? Part of the problem is that there is NO infrastructure.
Zmap is, unfortunately, hit or miss. Even despite the partial success of Zmap there isn't enough production of it since it was experimental at the beginning & even if there were enough and the distribution was there the patients would still have to rely on western doctors to get treatment.
The intelligence agency has done this before to help the DEA and domestic law enforcement.
Parallel construction has been proven for other investigations. It's unlikely any of them will give it up until they are forced to do so.
https://www.muckrock.com/news/...http://www.reuters.com/article...
Slashdot Mirror
Where in the article does it mention that surveillance was used? It seems like the evidence gathered so far was publicly published (Facebook), found in his car after detaining him on suspicion of "prowling", or from interviews with the suspect.
There are those with legitimate needs as well- MS, palsy, seizures, etc Previous study I read pointed to a correlated drop in IQ was 4 points (average) for low habitual use and 8 points (average) for high habitual use. Sorry I don't have the link immediately available, otherwise I'd I look up the size of that study as well.
You personal gun will never be effective against a nation state, they have tanks.
When tanks are deployed they have to be effectively supported with infantry, otherwise opposing infantry can outflank the tank and hit it from unexpected angles. Check out the Soviet war in Afghanistan.
APCs seem way more relevant nowadays. Even then, they aren't the end-all-be-all of warfare.
I don't advocate overthrowing government, but having small-arms enables a populace access to greater armaments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
If that's the case then Nvidia should really be on the hook for this rather than Google.
If the memory space is unallocated then the card should zero out any memory space that was recently released whenever the card isn't under heavy load.
Have heard this asserted before, but never really bothered looking it up. Had assumed tithes would be a datapoint in study, but nobody seems to mention it (even in my links). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa... http://news.rice.edu/2012/05/3... https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.do... Looks like there's no difference between the two groups (generally).
"around 50% of them end up back in terrorist camps"
Not every person in gitmo is a terrorist and the number that get released, that then decide to become (or continue being) terrorists is not general knowledge.
Doing a cursory Google search points to a far lower percentage (than 50%), and has further decreased over the years.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/18...
http://www.theguardian.com/us-...
So again I say "Citation needed"
Citation needed
What will the poor old insurance company do with it's patent when it's obviated by self-driving cars?
"John Bull" ... seems apropos for this subject...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
They have been at it for a while. IIRC they recently upgraded the floating point address spaces to 64bit so that the "levels" could be larger than the ~8km. They're also working a lot on the net code and (dynamic) instancing system.
CIG did promise they would allow people to host their own private servers.
There have been some Congress critters caught having their aides edit their wiki pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...
There are court battles happening today because people were made aware of the issue. One of the criteria to open a case is to prove that there is an injured party. That was not a possibility before Snowden because all proof was considered "secret".
Yes, Binney, Drake, and Meyer were all people that got punished for doing the right thing. Yes, there were people in the public that toed the party line of "the US doesn't torture", then following up with "waterboarding isn't torture and is legal because the White House counsel (but not the Attorney General) says so".
I don't understand this concept that someone is a fool for trying to right a wrong by making the the wrong known. Is it because he'll undoubtedly have a harder life? That's not foolish if he made the decision knowing that his life would be harder, which he does. There are many people that would do so (see other whistleblowers, aid workers, emergency workers, etc).
I agree that it will take a sea change in order to make long term changes to society. However for that to occur society needs to be made aware of the problem, which is being done by whistleblowers.
It's been partially tested (on a very unhappy monkey), but I agree that it hasn't been tested enough to prove that it would work reliably for a human.
The whole point of having whistleblower laws is that some information DOES need to be known by the public. The difference between the information ES released and a "nuclear scientist" releasing information is that one is actionable and the other isn't. Edward Snowden didn't release information on individuals in the field or information on how to make the surveillance technologies used.
What do you think of the Church Committee? The NSA has overstepped before and been reigned in. It takes time and it takes the will to reverse the idiotic course we've been on.
Government overreach will go away and come back. It happens, but that doesn't mean we have to tolerate it.
I think just the opposite. Marry in your thirties- people are more likely to be emotionally mature.
Sounds better than the method studied in 2013- having gold nano-rods injected into the testes and only lasting a few months. http://www.rsc.org/chemistrywo...
I'm not as familiar with the effects on humans, but it has had a noticeable effect on fish populations: http://www.scientificamerican....
Depends- you could have a minimum wage job that pays just enough to make rent, a second job to pay for food and clothing, and you have you take the bus to get everywhere. In such circumstances it can be hard to show up to the polls; employers can't force you to stay, but the money you need can.
Was that Rob Ford you're talking about?
I believe the logic behind it is that solar installations, which are considered competitors to energy companies, require batteries and the cheaper or more effective that batteries are the more competitive solar becomes.
I tend think it's a combination of issues. Some can be offset or fixed by teaching women differently (negotiation for more money), some possibly can be offset through a combination of law and working with their employers (maternity leave), but prejudice is the bug bear that's so hard to fix since it raises hackles (putting some on the defensive), is hard to teach & is misattributed as the cause when it's actually a different cause.
Women not asking for more money
http://www.womendontask.com/qu...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
http://hbr.org/2003/10/nice-gi...
-
Women deciding to have children
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
http://www.pewresearch.org/fac...
-
Prejudice
http://www.forbes.com/sites/wo...
Gotta do something with them. Even during the plague the dead got stacked and put away.
What "regular hospital"? Part of the problem is that there is NO infrastructure. Zmap is, unfortunately, hit or miss. Even despite the partial success of Zmap there isn't enough production of it since it was experimental at the beginning & even if there were enough and the distribution was there the patients would still have to rely on western doctors to get treatment.
The intelligence agency has done this before to help the DEA and domestic law enforcement. Parallel construction has been proven for other investigations. It's unlikely any of them will give it up until they are forced to do so. https://www.muckrock.com/news/... http://www.reuters.com/article...