I thought one of the things they were looking at was using it as a solution to cancer cells. Would it be approved to use if it could cure an 'incurable' form of cancer, only to risk causing another cancer? Could it be used to cure the cancer that itself caused?
I've had a Youtube video taken down years ago for a claim, and got it reinstated. It didn't cost me anything, in fact I think when I got notice of the take-down I was given a form to fill out by Youtube to challenge it. I simply copy-pasted a few statements from Wikipedia about fair-use and a few days later it was brought back to my account.
So unless Youtube has changed since then, it shouldn't take money, just a bit of time.
I want my search results to give relevant results, not what they think might be formatted best....
Besides, I still do most of my browsing on actual computer.
A lot of it is risk vs reward. A game with a good portion of it done shows that their is a lot less risk. Not only on the game getting completed and released, but also on if you may or may not like the finished result. So more people are going to be willing to shell out. The reward for a kickstarter is often just the finished product and possibly some extra swag if you want to pay more. If all you have is some concept art, the risk is a lot higher that you may not like the finished product. It could be a fine and successful product, but maybe not something that you may like or disappointed they went a different direction than you expected. A traditional investor on the other-hand, doesn't have to worry on if 'they' will like the end product. Just that it sells well enough to get their money and hopefully a profit on return back.
Slashdot Mirror
I thought one of the things they were looking at was using it as a solution to cancer cells. Would it be approved to use if it could cure an 'incurable' form of cancer, only to risk causing another cancer? Could it be used to cure the cancer that itself caused?
Hello darkness, my old friend
I've had a Youtube video taken down years ago for a claim, and got it reinstated. It didn't cost me anything, in fact I think when I got notice of the take-down I was given a form to fill out by Youtube to challenge it. I simply copy-pasted a few statements from Wikipedia about fair-use and a few days later it was brought back to my account. So unless Youtube has changed since then, it shouldn't take money, just a bit of time.
https://science.slashdot.org/s... Sounds like Slashdot is telling us Venus' is the future of energy.
Would have to pretty expensive to deport citizens.
I want my search results to give relevant results, not what they think might be formatted best.... Besides, I still do most of my browsing on actual computer.
When I was in school and got in a fight, they didn't call the cops a charge us with assault. They handled it at the school....
Everything is micro transactions... who would want to remember that?
So, can I use a space heater to extend the range of this new wireless technology?
Think of the Commercial applications! Kids hate peas? zap! they love 'em. McDonald sales down? Zap! New definition of 'Happy Meal'.
A lot of it is risk vs reward. A game with a good portion of it done shows that their is a lot less risk. Not only on the game getting completed and released, but also on if you may or may not like the finished result. So more people are going to be willing to shell out. The reward for a kickstarter is often just the finished product and possibly some extra swag if you want to pay more. If all you have is some concept art, the risk is a lot higher that you may not like the finished product. It could be a fine and successful product, but maybe not something that you may like or disappointed they went a different direction than you expected. A traditional investor on the other-hand, doesn't have to worry on if 'they' will like the end product. Just that it sells well enough to get their money and hopefully a profit on return back.