From the very beginning,.NET was made for brownfield app development - never for speed..NET has large dominance and is promoted by Microsoft because it wins over the windows platform.
Mathematics and calculus have given us many tools (domain and range calling back) to know for a fact whether something will work or not. That being said, most errors occur from the human side of things, although, technically, we could prove that code worked w/out having to provide real world data.
is a sense that "experts" (10,000+ hrs of experience) acquire, much like good design, only applied to something textual.
Sometimes, you just need to look at the code from a different perspective (UML helps, so does explaining to an XP partner).
Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of people in government who believe that having corporations be allowed to collect, use, share, sell, and otherwise exploit every piece of information about you is somehow a good thing.
Speaking of FB's example, my personal opinion is that mass data collection is not wrong; humanizing data about real people's emotion and then profiting from this is wrong.
Code, documents and pictures --> Printer.
Videos --> DVD
Music --> CD
Other --> USB Drive
Put the physical items in a waterproof bag.
Put waterproof bag in strong box.
Dig hole in backyard with kids.
Put box in hole.
Cover box with dirt.
Cover dirt with young tree or other large bush bought at local gardening store.
From the very beginning, .NET was made for brownfield app development - never for speed. .NET has large dominance and is promoted by Microsoft because it wins over the windows platform.
What is art? If I live by that principle, I'll never write a line.
Assembly inlining is good if you're writing 'clever' (DO NOT WRITE CLEVER CODE) code.
Good code doesn't have a single goddamn class named "Manager".
..but it does have main()
Mathematics and calculus have given us many tools (domain and range calling back) to know for a fact whether something will work or not. That being said, most errors occur from the human side of things, although, technically, we could prove that code worked w/out having to provide real world data.
is a sense that "experts" (10,000+ hrs of experience) acquire, much like good design, only applied to something textual. Sometimes, you just need to look at the code from a different perspective (UML helps, so does explaining to an XP partner).
...this happens.
The free version is limited in that it cannot be connected to other renderman nodes - no networked rendering
VHDL.
Wow. Unlike PHP, Perl, C, C++, C#, Pascal, and ECMAScript, VHDL's got a whole new paradigm.
the code is elegant and easy to understand as well. Just like every other language
Maybe I need to learn a new language.
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013... (not that I beleive in Lua)
What a cool name. Wish I lived there.
Get a good space on E3, then get a chromebook or some dumb terminal to act as the end machine.
Now I know that I'm generating good ideas.
Conficker was 25 million strong in its good days before the Conficker Cabal took it down.
FBI walks into hacker's hideout. "It's Gameover, Zeus," says the lead agent to a scrawny man sitting at a dumb terminal.
me@first.last.net
Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of people in government who believe that having corporations be allowed to collect, use, share, sell, and otherwise exploit every piece of information about you is somehow a good thing.
Free Enterprise
$$$ = $ for govt.
$$$$$$ = $$ for govt.
7. Though shal honor thy Do Not Track requests
Speaking of FB's example, my personal opinion is that mass data collection is not wrong; humanizing data about real people's emotion and then profiting from this is wrong.
'Privacy' and 'secrecy' are not the same
Obviously, (2) is bad if you don't... most people already know this, but cannot communicate this to a programmer when asked for 'specs'
Radon's transform is really useful here
Code, documents and pictures --> Printer.
Videos --> DVD
Music --> CD
Other --> USB Drive
Put the physical items in a waterproof bag.
Put waterproof bag in strong box.
Dig hole in backyard with kids.
Put box in hole.
Cover box with dirt.
Cover dirt with young tree or other large bush bought at local gardening store.
Come back twenty-five years and dig out treasure.