That assumes that the difference in position and momentum is greater than the uncertainty principle allows, which isn't immediately obvious. If you do the calculations, you may just find that the difference is smaller than QM allows, and thus there is no difference.
You forgot to account for inflation. 3% ish of the $1200 needs to be kept in the bank account to make sure you always have $1200 'worth' of money in there over time. That gives you $20 a year extra
I hate people like you. Why should we all just do only what is best for ourselves? What a selfish dick you are.
We all need to survive, and (constrained) capitalism is what makes the world go round. But if you think that's all there is to life then, damn, I hope you die unhappy.
> The cost to make a game (or any other product) ALWAYS factors into the end selling price; with very few exceptions (one of them being game consoles, which recoup their losses from licensing fees); any first year business student can tell you that.
Total rubbish. You sell the game at a price that maximises your profit. The cost of the developing the game doesn't come into it.
Just because the game cost you more to produce that doesn't change the optimal price for maximum profit.
> That's true. If you're uninsurable, it's because your risk is an order of magnitude larger than everyone else's. You aren't talking about spreading risk, but rather heaping your problems on everyone else.
So? The point of a society is that the strong look after the weak.
> I can definitely prove that hydrogen and oxygen combine in a ratio of two volumes H to 1 volume O.
Nope. All you can show is at some specific time, at some particular place, with some particular collection of hydrogen atoms and some particular collection of oxygen atoms appear to your instruments and interpretations as combining as a ratio of two volumes H to 1 volume O.
Likewise you can't prove the geese thing. And how do you know you're not the Queen of England, but just dreaming that you're not?
Store the odf's as unzipped folders. Zip it when the user downloads it, and unzip it when the user uploads it.
You'll probably want the download/upload down via webdav. User uploads say via webdav, you notice the upload, unzip it elsewhere, and commit. Should be easy:-)
As a slight twist, you could probably instead have the unzipping done as a pre-commit hook in svn server.
With XML you also get xslt (so you can convert say xml from your program into open office xml), and xpath (a standard way to point to any element in the xml file), css (so you can have a way to display nicely the xml if you want to edit it visually), and all the other xml technologies.
Slashdot Mirror
Way to go. People here (I'm English) are too afraid to say anything to the youths. That's why they feel they can get away with it.
And I find it sad that you cannot comprehend that they pretty much had to chose that license in order to push changes upstream to X11.
Sounds interesting to watch. I don't follow chess that much, but I played at school. Is there a commentated movie of it?
That assumes that the difference in position and momentum is greater than the uncertainty principle allows, which isn't immediately obvious. If you do the calculations, you may just find that the difference is smaller than QM allows, and thus there is no difference.
You forgot to account for inflation. 3% ish of the $1200 needs to be kept in the bank account to make sure you always have $1200 'worth' of money in there over time. That gives you $20 a year extra
Actually we just switched from Qt 4.2 to Qt 4.3 beta :-)
KDE runs a clipboard manager that lets you do what you describe.
In pretty much any country you can be changed for plotting to do a serious crime before you get to actually do it.
And yet you think that MS _should_ only do what benefits their bottom line and nothing else? How does that work?
Everything has to be an extreme for you, eh? Either you are a totally ruthless capitalist, or you are a communist, eh?
It is possible to earn money and do so honestly. I know that must be a shock to you.
I hate people like you. Why should we all just do only what is best for ourselves? What a selfish dick you are.
We all need to survive, and (constrained) capitalism is what makes the world go round. But if you think that's all there is to life then, damn, I hope you die unhappy.
> The cost to make a game (or any other product) ALWAYS factors into the end selling price; with very few exceptions (one of them being game consoles, which recoup their losses from licensing fees); any first year business student can tell you that.
Total rubbish. You sell the game at a price that maximises your profit. The cost of the developing the game doesn't come into it.
Just because the game cost you more to produce that doesn't change the optimal price for maximum profit.
But what if the photographer did do that? Would that make the photograph somehow worse?
> That's true. If you're uninsurable, it's because your risk is an order of magnitude larger than everyone else's. You aren't talking about spreading risk, but rather heaping your problems on everyone else.
So? The point of a society is that the strong look after the weak.
The shops that have open doors usually have a heat curtain thing.
Yes, you can have Quantum Error Correction
> I can definitely prove that hydrogen and oxygen combine in a ratio of two volumes H to 1 volume O.
Nope. All you can show is at some specific time, at some particular place, with some particular collection of hydrogen atoms and some particular collection of oxygen atoms appear to your instruments and interpretations as combining as a ratio of two volumes H to 1 volume O.
Likewise you can't prove the geese thing. And how do you know you're not the Queen of England, but just dreaming that you're not?
Doesn't the intel c compiler, icc, compile most linux apps?
> These days, with GUI-installed Linux distributions, Linux suffers from the same problem Windows used to be derided for: services are on by default.
Ubuntu, like almost all distros, has a policy of no public running services by default.
I can't speak for other distros, but I'm pretty almost all of them they have similar policies.
> How about instead of Kubuntu, we just stuck with Unbuntu, and got someone to maintain some sort of system for installing KDE
Which is exactly what you do have. It's just that you can't really fit both gnome and kde on the same CD. So you one cd for gnome and one cd for kde.
Once installed, there's no difference. You can apt-get install kde or apt-get install gnome etc.
Store the odf's as unzipped folders. Zip it when the user downloads it, and unzip it when the user uploads it.
:-)
You'll probably want the download/upload down via webdav. User uploads say via webdav, you notice the upload, unzip it elsewhere, and commit. Should be easy
As a slight twist, you could probably instead have the unzipping done as a pre-commit hook in svn server.
A lot of astronauts have snapped. Several have severe depression and other mental illnesses
With XML you also get xslt (so you can convert say xml from your program into open office xml), and xpath (a standard way to point to any element in the xml file), css (so you can have a way to display nicely the xml if you want to edit it visually), and all the other xml technologies.
Yeah, I somewhat step down from my position. :-)
Like everything else, it has its uses, often abused, but can be very useful.
Everyone agrees it's worrying, and nobody has any more details. What exactly do you expect people to say in comments?