Slashdot Mirror


NASA Fires Astronaut

davidwr writes "In an unprecedented move for an unprecedented situation, NASA has fired now-former astronaut Lisa Nowack. She is facing charges of attempted kidnapping related to an incident earlier this year. Ms. Nowack is a Navy officer and remains so."

323 comments

  1. Has anyone tried by Normal+Dan · · Score: 4, Funny

    listening to her side of the story?

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    1. Re:Has anyone tried by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I agree. I would certainly like to know the perfectly rational reason for driving 900 miles in diapers, and then tracking down and pepper-spraying someone you have never met, in an airport parking lot.

              Brett

    2. Re:Has anyone tried by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure many people have... including the mental health professionals responsible for certifying that the astronauts are maintaining the presence of mind and emotional stability necessary to perform what is a very demanding, stressful, and risky job.

      I'd imagine that it takes very little in the way of strange behavior to disqualify a person for astronaut duty, regardless of what their explanation is. Even if her behavior was totally justified and not in any way her fault, the fact that she ended up behaving this way probably means she's not good astronaut material anymore. Astronauts should generally not respond to environmental or emotional stress by flipping out and committing crimes.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guiltyuntilproveninnocent

    4. Re:Has anyone tried by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see her explain it all on "Larry King Live."

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    5. Re:Has anyone tried by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oefelein told investigators he and Nowak both served on the bicycling team at NASA and had been involved in a sexual relationship for some time. He said he met Shipman in November 2006 while he was involved in pre-launch training at Kennedy Space Center. In January 2007, Oefelein said, he told Nowak he wanted to date Shipman "exclusively."

      Even if Oefelein handled things poorly or strung her along a bit (I'm not asserting that he did this)her reaction still made her unfit to be an astronaut. She reacts unpredictably to emotional stress, who wants to fly with her?

      --
      We are all just people.
    6. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She got pushed from business to coach and had no time to stop driving to make her flight?

    7. Re:Has anyone tried by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What more is there? She flipped out over a love triangle. She went directly from jail in Florida to a psychological evaluation by NASA in Texas. If she can lose it on the ground, she can lose it in space. So NASA's decision to let her go was probably sound based on what she told them and her evaluation.

    8. Re:Has anyone tried by Normal+Dan · · Score: 3, Funny

      That "someone" put her through a lot of needless emotional pain. Perhpas that "someone" will now think twice before so carelessly hurting others, thus making this world a better place for all. Some might even say Lisa is a hero among heros.

      As for the diapers. Well, that is so you can drive non stop. Duh.

      See? It is all perfectly rational.

      --
      A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    9. Re:Has anyone tried by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      I haven't personally listened to her side of the story, but I intend to just as soon as get the run down from the bum who hangs around my office building raving about aliens and mind control and such. As soon as I get that straight, I'm sure to want to hear about the benefits of driving in diapers.

      Hey, doesn't the US have minimum sanity standards for officers in the armed services?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    10. Re:Has anyone tried by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      If she can lose it on the ground, she can lose it in space.
      I'm just glad she didn't lose it on any of those test flights near Washington...
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    11. Re:Has anyone tried by sehlat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Minimum sanity standards for officers? Good Lord, man, why not minimum sanity standards for the Commander in Chief?

      Oh, wait...

    12. Re:Has anyone tried by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what I blame this on the breakdown of? Society. [/Syzlak]

            Brett

    13. Re:Has anyone tried by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure she can become a professional pundit:

      "You know, Larry, before I went completely blitzo, drove 900 miles in diapers to kill my would-be boyfriend's love interest, I too believed that Mormons didn't buy nearly enough Elton John records."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Has anyone tried by JimDaGeek · · Score: 0

      Are you for real? Just because this psycho-chick had her feelings hurt you want to excuse her actions? Please. The chick drove 900 miles in adult diapers and pissed her pants. Jeez. How much more psycho can you get? How many people wear diapers when they drive so they do not have to pull over? How many people piss their pants in diapers when they drive so they do not have to pull over?

      Oh, and then there is the whole pepper spray thing. Out of a jealous rage, she pepper sprayed some chick because some fellow astronaut didn't want her any more. Oh, boo-hoo. Get over it.

      NASA astronauts need to be the "best of the best". We are planning on sending some astronauts, both male and female, to Mars for like a 30 month journey. The last thing we need on a 30 month journey in close quarters is some jealous chick that is going to go "Dahmer" on the whole crew because some other female astronaut looked at "her man". Astronauts should not be allowed to have intimate relations with one another. There are "plenty of fish in the sea" that should allow all astronauts to have intimate relations with non-astronauts.

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    15. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      We are in charge of our emotions.

      Hers got away.

      Professionalism went away.

      There's plausible evidence that it was attempted murder. Needless emotional pain, and every other kind of pain, is no excuse for her inappropriate and aggressive behavior. If she's a hero, then people are misguided. Weak excuses for revenge are the commuppance of schnooks.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    16. Re:Has anyone tried by revlayle · · Score: 1

      i think that was SARCASM

    17. Re:Has anyone tried by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Funny

      The diaper thing makes me think she'd be pushing George Clinton and Parliament/Funkadelic records rather than Elton.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    18. Re:Has anyone tried by deltacephei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not disagreeing with you, but a definite issue is the large size of the astronaut core overall. Why have so many people, at very high cost, been accepted and trained only to then wait for years for their number to come up and the chance to participate in a mission? It's not unreasonable to think that a smaller group would be easier to monitor for social problems, and correspondingly decrease the probability of something like this happening. If NASA has invested thousands (millions?) per person in training, then they should be paying better attention to these people - they are in effect quite a precious asset. I'd say NASA has a lot of egg on their face here, even if they won't step up to the plate and admit it.

    19. Re:Has anyone tried by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What about him? If what you quote is true, then he didn't just handle things poorly, he handled things unprofessionally. He gets involved with a married woman at work at then ditches her for another woman he meets at work? It is almost always a bad idea to get involved with people you need to have a working relationship with... to say nothing of people you might have to work with 100 miles above the earth.

      His career is probably shot at this point. They won't fire him- it would draw yet more unwanted attention to NASA, and he might make false accusations (or worse, true ones) about NASA's own failures (for instance, that NASA turned a blind eye to this kind of behavior). But NASA might issue a strong reprimand, and make it clear that they would do everything in their power to make his transition to a non-NASA career as quick and painless as possible. I doubt he will ever fly again- there would be too much negative publicity. If they ever put him on a shuttle, the mission would get more publicity from rude jokes by Leno and Letterman than any of the actual science would.

    20. Re:Has anyone tried by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Hey, doesn't the US have minimum sanity standards for officers in the armed services?"

      Problem being, psych tests only catch people too stupid or uneducated to lie their way through them. They are basically the equivalent of asking "Are you nuts?".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:Has anyone tried by magicchex · · Score: 1

      Problem being, psych tests only catch people too stupid or uneducated to lie their way through them. They are basically the equivalent of asking "Are you nuts?".
      Or too crazy?
      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    22. Re:Has anyone tried by alisson · · Score: 1

      We are in charge of our emotions. Mmm hmm, that's what clinical psychology is all about. Telling people they have no problems.
    23. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      No, that's not true. People are responsible for their own emotions; they are indeed in charge of them.

      Slicing this into an opinion that says that clinical psychology tells people they have no problems is the gruff of the sociopath. Indeed we all have problem, but we're in charge of the emotional ones, how they affect us, and others.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    24. Re:Has anyone tried by alisson · · Score: 1

      But no, not everyone is. You mention sociaopaths, do you believe that they do, in fact have the capability of empathy, they simply choose not to use it? A lot of research says otherwise.

      The problem is that there are times when people cannot control their emotions. Does this excuse Lisa? Certainly not, I never meant to imply that. But the idea that we always have complete control over our emotions, or even our thoughts, is ludicrous.

    25. Re:Has anyone tried by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      People are responsible for their own emotions; they are indeed in charge of them.
      Really? I was under an impression that a whole gamut of methods exists precisely to effectively destroy that control (although with rather unpredicable results). Some recently popularized by the US Government go under such names as "waterboarding" or "prolonged stress positions".
    26. Re:Has anyone tried by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about him?

      I think he is done too. This will bring all the attention of NASA evaluators on him. Not to mention that them both being Navy officers renders their activities in direct violation of all the various rules of professional conduct which officers must adhere to. I am quite certain that adultery is frowned upon in those.

      So I would expect his/her court martials and/or dishonorable discharges to be just around the corner. It just so happens that her truly outre ways are hogging all the news at the moment. His moment in the spotlight is coming.

    27. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      No one needs to be robotic in behavior.

      But you get the essence of my comment correctly when you cite that it doesn't excuse her behavior.

      Sociopaths must still be culpable for whatever emotions they have, don't have, can't express, etc. Otherwise, we end up with two classes of humans: can't control emotions but excusable; can't control emotions but inexcusable.

      Ok, maybe it's different in Washington DC.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    28. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      The act of eliciting a response involuntarily is a bad idea, just like you suggest.

      The fact that the US Government condones such beha vior betrays one of the reasons I find them so contemptuous. Torture isn't what I learned in civics class.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    29. Re:Has anyone tried by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Problem: He can opt to set the standards himself.

      Good one though!

    30. Re:Has anyone tried by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure to want to hear about the benefits of driving in diapers.

      This part has been explained in the very first news article on the subject. You want to wear diapers, when you can not (or don't want to) be interrupted. Apparently, astronauts wear diapers at launch/re-entry. It is a good idea, because you may spend a while strapped to a chair.

      She wanted to get over 900 miles as quickly as possible — without stopping to pee — strapped to the driver seat. This part of her act is not at all crazy.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    31. Re:Has anyone tried by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

      Listening? I don't think anyone cares, except maybe family & Hollywood East in the San Fernando Valley @ Vivid.

      She created her own EOL on her career and probably any other job she can get other than flipping at MacDonalds.

      Bo

    32. Re:Has anyone tried by natet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I agree. I would certainly like to know the perfectly rational reason for driving 900 miles in diapers, and then tracking down and pepper-spraying someone you have never met, in an airport parking lot.

      Too much has been made of the diaper thing. To us non-astronaut types, wearing the diapers is kind of crazy, but it is a trick astronauts use when they go on space walks and such when needing to use the bathroom is inconvenient if not impossible. That part isn't crazy IMHO. The rest of it? Yah, totally wacko. I was under the impression she knew the other person though. I could have been misinformed though.

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    33. Re:Has anyone tried by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      The fact that the US Government condones such beha vior betrays one of the reasons I find them so contemptuous. Torture isn't what I learned in civics class.

      I find no fault with your position on this.

      However, my response was meant to illustrate that your original assertion of humans being responsible for being in control of their emotions at all times was faulty. I simply presented an example where such control is purposefuly made impossible via efforts of other people, thus invalidating your premise.

    34. Re:Has anyone tried by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      listening to her side of the story?

      Firing her seems a bit odd . . . I'd figure with cases like this, they'd just keep her suspended without pay pending the outcome of the trial. Granted, if everything that's been reported is true, she's nucking futs, but there's something to be said about the philosophy of "innocent until proven guilty [in front of a judge and jury]." Firing her sounds like NASA is taking a stand in what is probably an ongoing investigation . . .

    35. Re:Has anyone tried by mikael · · Score: 1

      That trick with diapers is also done in China to avoid the toilets in overcrowded trains with long journey times. Going by state of some train toilets in the UK, and the risk of someone nicking your seat if you walk over to somewhere like the buffet car to get a drink/sandwich I can't blame them.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    36. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Goaded behavior is involuntary; then there is the problem of co-dependency. On the surface, they seem the same, but are different.

      Torture serves the aggressive and inhumane motives of individuals. The individuals that torture are responsible for their emotions. One of them should be to bring no harm to other humans. The person being tortured relinquishes control involuntarily.

      Goaded behavior is still the responsibility of the person, but when torture robs one of control through physical or intensely focused psychological pain, the person becomes incapable of being responsible for their emotions in the same way that a sanity-challenged schizophrenic believes the voices in their head.

      Is the schizophrenic individual responsible for their own emotions? Yes. Is there culpability to, having had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, to take their meds and get needed therapy? Yes-- that's part of the responsibility part. If they eschew medication, become violent and hurt someone, are they culpable? Yes. If they were undiagnosed, then and only then, perhaps not.

      These are fine lines divided over capacity to be responsible. Do sociopaths have an obligation to mimic behavior in such a way as to become responsible? There lays a deeper question. There are also additional interesting classes and groups, such as highly functioning autistic individuals, Type A personalities with explosive profiles and others. I think the key is capacity for responsibility and exercising based on knowledge of that capacity.

      The tortured become robbed of that responsibility. Torturers defy the responsibility of acting for the better good. And their emotions are suspect if they indeed have them at all.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    37. Re:Has anyone tried by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      Again, none of the above changes my original objection. Your statement was absolute, i.e. did not allow for exceptions. I presented an exception, thus invalidating it. That is all I was intending to point out.

      The subject of behaviour of mentally ill and their responsibilities to society -- or their ability to even be "responsible" -- is a whole different, extremely complicated field, awash with subjective, unscientific judgement calls and I do not think it is possible to introduce firm rules there as you appear to be attempting to. One way or the other, it is beyond the scope of my original, rather concise argument.

    38. Re:Has anyone tried by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not really relevant - it's supposedly a democracy after all.

      I'm just wondering about the sanity of those who voted him in the SECOND TIME AROUND.

      Even if he wasn't really voted in, and the voting machines were tampered with etc, the voters are responsible for allowing such voting machines to be used.

      --
    39. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > How many people piss their pants in diapers
      > when they drive so they do not have to pull over?

      Astronauts.

    40. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the schizophrenic individual responsible for their own emotions? Yes. Is there culpability to, having had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, to take their meds and get needed therapy? Yes-- that's part of the responsibility part. If they eschew medication, become violent and hurt someone, are they culpable? Yes. If they were undiagnosed, then and only then, perhaps not.
      You mention torture as being an involuntary release of control and then make a metaphor involving schizophrenics and medicine, try taking medicines for schizophrenia some day. Day in day out, they are torture in its most pure form. Schizophrenics who eschew medication do so because there are very real dangers in taking many of the medicines for schizophrenia both psychological, personal, and physical. I am fortunate enough to have only suffered from the personal and psychological dangers, the last medicine I was on made me incapable of living, I couldn't get out of bed in the morning I drove to school one day (no clue how I made it) and parked my car and then that was it, I had nothing else left in me, I couldn't walk the little bit further to make it to my class, I sat in the car in blistering heat with no ac because I couldn't bring myself to walk in to my class I spent every ounce of will power driving there. And there are worse dangers than that, there is the very real possibility of permanent brain damaged from many of the drugs. Watch out when you are making metaphors about things you do not understand.

    41. Re:Has anyone tried by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      Otherwise, we end up with two classes of humans: can't control emotions but excusable; can't control emotions but inexcusable

      Well Duh!.

      I don't know what planet you're from Sparky, but here on Earth, we call them "women" and "men"

      /me ducks and runs....

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    42. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to have made the mistakes of lumping all of the variations of schizophrenia into a single lump for illustration purposes.

      However, I understand why you eschew medication. It may be right, and it may be wrong, depending on how you can live your life in a civil environment. With meds, I've seen some individuals diagnosed with SPD do wonderfully, others not so. Sometimes the meds were plainly wrong. Others live life without them successfully; I have individuals in my immediate family that fall into both groups. Clearly some can't be successful without medication or other intervention. Others can do it. The capacity to be responsible is the crux of my argument. Lose that capacity voluntarily and you're far more dangerous than the 'normal' human. Involuntarily losing the capacity is something different.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    43. Re:Has anyone tried by camperdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, astronauts do actually routinely use diapers. Mind you, that's during spacewalks, not travelling down the interstate.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    44. Re:Has anyone tried by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spacewalks really aren't common enough to be considered routine, though.

    45. Re:Has anyone tried by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      From what I know, the navy doesn't really care about adultery. I'm also relatively sure that if there isn't a rank conflict(ie he was her commanding officer or vice versa), they don't really care about two naval personally having an intimiate relationship. Lord knows that sort of thing has been going on for eternity.

    46. Re:Has anyone tried by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      I personally think there is no such thing as bad publicity. No one has been talking about NASA for years until lately.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    47. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also relatively sure that if there isn't a rank conflict(ie he was her commanding officer or vice versa), they don't really care about two naval personally having an intimiate relationship. Lord knows that sort of thing has been going on for eternity.

      Yeah, even when the Navy was all-male. Or perhaps I should say, especially when the Navy was all-male.

    48. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, while her motivation was suspect, and certainly her goal as well, the steps she took to accomplish the latter were perfectly logical, regardless, as one would expect from someone with her training.

      I'm not applauding her actions in any way, only pointing out that it appears to me that if one wished to drive 900 miles, non-stop, without having to worry about urination, then, wearing an adult diaper would certainly be the best way to accomplish that, when viewed from a "bladder perspective" *grin* (ignoring the fuel requirements of the vehicle she was driving, obviously :) ).

      Anyway, to address JimDaGeek's comments:

      "We are planning on sending some astronauts, both male and female, to Mars for like a 30 month journey."
      First of all - while I'm sure you'd like to be, you're not in the "We", that are planning this, most especially since you have no problem using phrases such as "for like a 30 month journey".

      So, like, how close to 30 months is that journey, Dude? Can you, like, give us a clue? Plot it? Got any idea, beyond a vague "Like, Dude, it's a long time?"

      "The last thing we need on like a 30 month journey in close quarters is like some jealous chick that is going to go like "Dahmer" on the whole crew".

      So, you're saying that, if she hadn't been stopped, AND been chosen on some future Mars mission, that she would have attacked the crew, sexually abused them, killed them and then eaten parts of their corpses? I'm assuming that the "Dahmer" is a reference to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer. Even quoted ("Dahmer"), that's more than a little extreme.

      You're an idiot.

      "Astronauts should not be allowed to have intimate relations with one another."

      "There are "plenty of fish in the sea that should allow all astronauts to have intimate relations with non-astronauts.""

      OK, I'm mildly curious: How many people do you anticipate will be able to go on the first mission to Mars? Every astronaut will have a "non-astronaut", to fuck, so as to "allow all astronauts to have intimate relations with non-astronauts"?

      That's a 1-1 ratio: So, for every Astronaut, you have a non-Astronaut, for them to have "intimate relations" with, so as to conform with your perception of the "Perfect Astronaut"?

      You're an idiot.

      "Astronauts should not be allowed to have intimate relations with one another."

      Why not? If you accept the fact that they are highly intelligent (because, they ARE), then, the BEST possible combination, for a successful mission to Mars is: As many qualified Astronauts as can be sent, together, that can co-exist with each other, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, etc., for the time they spend together, which is, by your own admission, like, a long time, Dude :)

      They have to be able to survive together, and certainly, sex/"intimate relations" is going to be an issue... but that's something that THEY will have to work out, as best they can, on their journey, and it's not for those of us left behind to second guess, I think, regardless of your wishes.

      So, like, here's my opinion: Stop posting such drivel here, please? 'Cause, like, your prudishness is showing?

      Oh, and your stupidity and ignorance, too.

      'Cause, you're like, IMHO, an idiot, you know?

    49. Re:Has anyone tried by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "Hey, doesn't the US have minimum sanity standards for officers in the armed services?"

      Well. Considering the armed services must routinely employ violence (that's why they are "armed", after all), a small amount of insanity can be useful.

      Being crazy may not be required, but it certainly helps.

    50. Re:Has anyone tried by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      I believe that the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, specifically forbids adultery -- regardless of the rank of the offenders -- with a maximum penalty of "Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year".

      I do not think he will do time, but "dishonorable discharge" or at least a demotion is definitely coming.

    51. Re:Has anyone tried by senatorpjt · · Score: 3, Funny

      How many people wear diapers when they drive so they do not have to pull over?

      I dunno, but I'm a guy, so I just piss in an empty Snapple bottle.

    52. Re:Has anyone tried by Debug0x2a · · Score: 1

      Sure, but regardless of being guilty of attempted murder/kidnapping or innocent, she acted in a manner that is unprofessional according to NASA's standards.

      --
      First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
    53. Re:Has anyone tried by mclearn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hell, most female paragliders wear diapers when performing long cross-country flights especially in competitive or hostile environments when landing for bathroom breaks is not an option. Most guys tend to perform "high altitude irrigation" -- it's easier to perform when you can angle the flow.

    54. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How many people do you anticipate will be able to go on the first mission to Mars? Every astronaut will have a "non-astronaut", to fuck, so as to "allow all astronauts to have intimate relations with non-astronauts"?

      Well I'm almost convinced that there are Moon Maidens on the Moon and Vixens on Mars, so there should be no probs.
      In any case, the most logical thing is to have a chain of space-station brothels reaching out from Earth to Mars and beyond! I suppose you can stick one on Deimos too! That way the 30 month journey (with lets say 15 stops, lay-overs or whatever you want to call them), would be more fun and rewarding!

    55. Re:Has anyone tried by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Damn it! So I was pissed on!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    56. Re:Has anyone tried by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      I just piss in an empty Snapple bottle.

      What kind of EGCG levels do you get with that?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    57. Re:Has anyone tried by tonigonenstein · · Score: 1

      the mission would get more publicity from rude jokes by Leno and Letterman than any of the actual science would
      What is this "science" thing that you say is performed on the shuttle ?
      --
      The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
    58. Re:Has anyone tried by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. I would certainly like to know the perfectly rational reason for driving 900 miles in diapers, and then tracking down and pepper-spraying someone you have never met, in an airport parking lot.

      She planned to kick this woman's ass?

      Granted, that's not an entirely savory activity, but it's a far cry from attempted kidnapping or murder.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    59. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love triangle gone arwy.

    60. Re:Has anyone tried by gavink42 · · Score: 1

      The military does care about adultery and has taken disciplinary action against both officers and enlisted members alike in the past. I remember a female Air Force pilot that was in the news a year or so ago for adultery.

      Relationships within your own chain of command, especially between members of differing ranks are (at a minimum) frowned upon. But, I don't believe they were in anything other than training together, so she would not have been his Commanding Officer.

      Several military regulations and standards were broken in this situation. Of course, NASA is not run as a "typical" military organization, even though a large percentage of staff is military.

      These things do go on all the time in all branches of the military. But it seems like action against the service members is only taken in high-profile cases or if the spouse complains loud enough.

    61. Re:Has anyone tried by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Well, astronauts do actually routinely use diapers. First they tell me that MacGuyver is unrealistic, then they tell me that astronauts wear diapers... Is there anything left of my childhood-heroes? A bunch of shit and urine in a diaper, that's all that remains.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    62. Re:Has anyone tried by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      We're in control of our emotions in the same way we can control our sense of smell. Sure, you can try to make your house smell better. But if your wife lets out a nasty fart, no amount of will power will let you ignore it. If it's particularly sulfurous, you might even act in ways some might call irrational.

      Substitute "sense of pain" for "sense of smell" if you didn't get the essential idea.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    63. Re:Has anyone tried by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      It's probably been a standard since (Was it John Glen?) wet himself after an 8-hour hold. Given that his entire (suborbital) flight was to take less than an hour, they hadn't even considered the possibility of having to relieve himself while in the capsule.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    64. Re:Has anyone tried by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      Too much has been made of the diaper thing. well,
      • It's sensational... We're talking media here.
      • It does point to the premeditated nature of the act. Even astronauts probably don't normally use their space-diapers while driving.
      • I'm wondering if she spent more time finding and putting on the diaper than she would have spent stopping at a rest stop (or just using a bush).
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    65. Re:Has anyone tried by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      The diaper thing makes me think she'd be pushing George Clinton and Parliament/Funkadelic records rather than Elton.
      ...to the Amish.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    66. Re:Has anyone tried by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Since you're so in control of your emotions, turn on your empathy unit. He wasn't asking for approval.

      Here's a little story for you. Kurt Godel, the famous logician, starved himself to death because he though his caretaker was poisoning him. He wasn't in a position to do anything else about it. That's a perfectly rational thing to do, too. Would you be able to "control your emotions" and eat food you thought was poisoned? Sometimes you can't tell truth from fiction.

      So what do you say to someone who refuses to take his medication precisely because the condition it's required for is influencing his choice? Even if the "real world" consequences prove to be bad, was their choice morally bad?

      Depending on your answer, you've either contradicted yourself or need to read about epistemology and ethics.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    67. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh just shut up, Lisa! You won't be going to Mars, and it's your own fault, get over it.

    68. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He did absolutely nothing wrong. Being involved with 2 women at the same time isn't a crime and he did tell the crazy chick that he preferred being with the other woman.

      This was completely and totally on her. If someone breaks up with you, it doesn't give you the right to assault someone.

    69. Re:Has anyone tried by nbritton · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point. Maybe we should get congress to pass a bill that requires all presidential candidates to pass an IQ test, administered by the opposing party, with a 100 or better.

    70. Re:Has anyone tried by EvanED · · Score: 1

      It's probably been a standard since (Was it John Glen?) wet himself after an 8-hour hold.

      If The Right Stuff is accurate, it was Shepard.

      After all, he was only going up for a few minutes. Surely he could hold it until he got back.

      (Okay, this is disturbing. This is the second, unrelated post I've made about space and urine in the last day...)

    71. Re:Has anyone tried by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the Transformers movie is coming out this summer.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    72. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I would expect his/her court martials and/or dishonorable discharges to be just around the corner.
      I would hope so - they wouldn't want the kind of person who volunteers for the most deadly organization in the world, get promoted to navy captain, but fails to kill their target.
    73. Re:Has anyone tried by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Sure, on-duty astronauts use diapers and there's nothing strange about it, but they do so out of necessity. Choosing to drive 900 miles with you pelvis soaked in piss and shit, on the other hand...

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    74. Re:Has anyone tried by camperdave · · Score: 1

      First they tell me that MacGuyver is unrealistic...

      Well, he once repaired a bullet hole in a hot air balloon by taping a large paper map over the hole... by the corners. Fortunately, he was able to reach the hole by standing on the edge of the basket.

      It may not have been the most realistic show, but it certainly was cool.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    75. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      It's important to separate emotions with basal sanity. Godel despite his other admirable characteristics and outstanding work, was insane to starve himself to death. If you believe suicide to be morally wrong under his circumstances, then he was out of control. If an individual refuses medications that allow him to live civilly, then it's a choice, and a wrong one, morally. It's measuring ourselves against society civilly that can be used as a metric for behavior.

      Can suicide be moral? Under some circumstances, yes; the easiest example to cite in my opinion is suicide to avoid a horrid painful death. Oregon allows assisted suicide under what I believe to be a very humane law. Is paranoia a good reason? Probably not.

      When a person refuses medication that allows the person to have control of their actions-- separating this from their emotions-- then they've refused control. Hideous as that may sound, subsequent emotional malaise may overtake them to bad ends, from the aforementioned civil perspective. That choice was morally wrong, just like drunk/drink-driving is morally wrong. There is no contradiction when taken from that perspective.

      Sociopathy is another bag of worms; how does one deal with an emotionally (and genetically) robbed individual? The answers are tough.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    76. Re:Has anyone tried by pedalman · · Score: 1

      Well I'm almost convinced that there are Moon Maidens on the Moon and Vixens on Mars, so there should be no probs.
      If the male astronauts are lucky, there may even be an Orion slave girl or two to keep things interesting.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    77. Re:Has anyone tried by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Minimum sanity standards for officers? Good Lord, man, why not minimum sanity standards for the Commander in Chief?
      Oh, wait...


      Why not maximum sanity standards for leaders? That's obviously what we've always wanted as a species. Come on our "favorite" "leaders" were all loopy. They wouldn't make it in normal sane society, so we make them our leaders. I'm sure there is a good reason that we do this.

    78. Re:Has anyone tried by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but I'm a guy, so I just piss in an empty Snapple bottle. I bet diapers would work just as well if not better.
    79. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just said that "paranoia is not a good reason".

      That sounds like you're not thinking very clearly; I hope that is a temporary lapse, and not a permanent impairment...

    80. Re:Has anyone tried by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Ground control to Major Tom,
      There is a crazed woman in diapers headed straight for you!
      Ground control to Major Tom,
      Roll up your car windows and call 911, who knows what she will do...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    81. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not court martials, it's courts-martial. You always pluralize the noun, not the adjective. Attorneys general is another good example.

    82. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, to me this reads dedication and a willingness to commit - astronaut material for sure.

    83. Re:Has anyone tried by spun · · Score: 1

      One is not automatically in control of one's emotions. Like anything else, being in control of ones emotions takes the belief that it is possible and a worthwhile thing to do, life experiences that render it possible, cooperative biochemistry, and actual practice. Some people will never be in control of their emotions due to lacking one of these factors.

      A person being tortured does not relinquish control involuntarily. The heart beats involuntarily. People choose to relinquish control. Some Buddhist monks, with extensive practice in controlling their minds, have been imprisoned and tortured for years in China. When interviewed, one claimed that the hardest thing for him during his decade of imprisonment and torture was maintaining compassion for his captors. That he succeeded in doing so is proof that torture is only one factor among many that determines if one is capable of maintaining control.

      It seems that you feel the need to maintain a strict definition of control. I'm guessing that is because you feel the need to assign responsibility to individuals. The problem here is twofold. Control, while a useful concept on a basic level, is an illusion on a higher level. Control indicates something that exercises control, and something being controlled. In reality, any distinction between the two is arbitrary and only valid from a particular point of view. This leads to the second problem: there are no individuals. Again, the concept of "individual" is like the Newtonian concept of gravity: useful on one level but utterly inapplicable on a higher level.

      Nothing is a thing unto itself. This is an illusion, like the faces and vase optical illusion. The thing is the vase, the universe the faces. One defines the other, there is no separation between the two, there is no ground in which the two separately exist. They are the same thing.

      I am guessing that you have decided to take responsibility for your emotions, which is a good thing even if illusionary. But forgetting that it is just a concept to be used where applicable will lead to stagnation and brittleness. It will lead to the formation of moral judgments against self and others. It is not mind's place to make moral judgments. It is mind's place to reflect, discern, model, and plan.

      Making moral judgments activates primitive emotional response systems that cloud thinking and create attachments. Those who judge can never be free.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    84. Re:Has anyone tried by JurgenThor · · Score: 0

      http://www.threadless.com/product/261/What_Would_M acgyver_Do Appreciate it! I just got this shirt, but it seems no one in the UK knows who MacGyver is! :-( Damn my US influenced NZ upbringing.

      --
      GENERAL PUBLIC SIGNATURE (GPS) Any replies (derivatives) of this post must also use the GPS
    85. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Your 'eastern' method of viewing things in this way has merits, but it also allows one to be perhaps 'slippery' in application. At the root of a moral code needs to be values. Those values, in turn, present a civilization based on composites of those values.

      We're provoked, manipulated, and otherwise cajoled into results. These judgments and the actions that result are how we communicate emotions. Responsibility for them means active control over them and the implications of the results. I see the merits of being free as a causality of lack of being a judge. There's a Zen koan that applies.... something about looking upwards during a cloudburst and cursing the sky.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    86. Re:Has anyone tried by Moofie · · Score: 1

      More like, "You are responsible for your problems."

      That seems pretty OK to me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    87. Re:Has anyone tried by Moofie · · Score: 1

      ...directed by Michael Bay. I'd prefer the shit and urine.

      (I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am...)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    88. Re:Has anyone tried by daver969 · · Score: 1

      > We are in charge of our emotions.

      > Hers got away.

      that's a pretty big contradiction there!

      like saying
      We're in charge of our emotions, except when we're not.

    89. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      The parent comment applauded her for reacting in the way she did. My comments were poised towards the fact that she behaved irresponsibly. There are no mitigating circumstances for what she did, according to the observations that I've read. She is in charge of her emotions, but she let them get the best of her. The same sort of problem leads to dozens of murders every day.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    90. Re:Has anyone tried by spun · · Score: 1

      If the danger of a non-dualistic way of thinking is a slippery application of relative morals, then the danger of dualism is reductionism leading to systems-blindness. When all one sees are the individual parts and not the systems that the parts create and are created by, one is blind to a large class of real effects.

      This is the problem as I see it with individualism. It allows people to blame others rather than look at the systems we are all a part of and might be able to influence. It is so much easier to say, for instance, "He stole. He is responsible for his actions" than it is to look at the systemic causes of poverty. Looking at the causes of poverty, one might have to admit that one benefits from a system that treats others unfairly and does not provide the same level of opportunity to all. Being a good person, one might then decide they had to change that system.

      So, before a conscious decision, the mind weighs the possible outcomes of believing that individuals are always responsible for their actions on the one hand and that systems influence behavior on the other. In the first case, there is judgment, a sense of superiority, and a sense of satisfaction. In the second case, there is a sense of responsibility, possibly confusion as to the correct course, and a desire to act to correct injustice.

      Obviously, one of these is far more pleasant than the other for most people.

      I don't think there are any absolute moral values. Certainly, there are values that are absolute to a given set, such as "all of humanity." But even societies that tend towards moral absolutism recognize that, for example, their God is not bound by the same moral code that they are.

      Given that, how can one arrive at a satisfactory set of values? Enlightened self interest seems the best course as it seems to yield results virtually indistinguishable from the absolute morals that most major religions espouse, without the need to subjugate one's own moral and intellectual discernment to some external force.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    91. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      An interesting perspective.

      It smacks of Ayn Rand in someways....

      I don't think that moral absolutism is necessarily wise, but it's a fascinating goal. There are those pillars from which we judge ourselves and others by, or not. It's impossible to ignore the actions of others. Decisions-judgments are a part of the human experience. They can be put aside, at the expense of emotional involvement and the automaton that likely results.

      The non-self self of Buddhism seems practical in the comparison, too. Lao Tse, the Buddha, and the concept of the dharma self have additional implications.

      But rather than the theocratic discussion that might ensue
      I have real work to do
      To satisfy the bills that I must pay
      So I'll leave the discussion to another day.

      Thanks.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    92. Re:Has anyone tried by spun · · Score: 1

      AAAAAAHhhhhhh! Noooooooooo! You just compared me to Ayn Rand. Besides Anne Coulter, there is not an Ann (or Anne, or Ayn) out there I would less like to be compared to. ;-)

      I thought that to be free from attachments, one had to be free from emotions, too. I've found in practice that this is not the case. One can be attached to being free from attachments, and it is this that usually leads to suppression of emotions and automaton status. I can feel happy without being attached to staying that way, and sad without feeling like I am failing to be free of attachment.

      The middle path is a tricky one to walk.

      Ever read Finite and Infinite Games by James P. Carse? Or The Four Agreements about the Toltec tradition? I would also recommend Mark Twain's short essay "What is Man?"

      The east doesn't have a lock on non-dualistic thinking. ;-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    93. Re:Has anyone tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't throw diapers as far though.

    94. Re:Has anyone tried by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but I'm a guy, so I just piss in an empty Snapple bottle.

      I suggest clearly labelling them.

      You don't want to make that mistake at highway speeds. I bet it would be, er, distracting. ;-)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    95. Re:Has anyone tried by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but I'm a guy, so I just piss in an empty Snapple bottle.

      Never use apple juice for this!

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    96. Re:Has anyone tried by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      It's important to separate emotions with basal sanity. Godel despite his other admirable characteristics and outstanding work, was insane to starve himself to death. If you believe suicide to be morally wrong under his circumstances, then he was out of control. If an individual refuses medications that allow him to live civilly, then it's a choice, and a wrong one, morally. It's measuring ourselves against society civilly that can be used as a metric for behavior.

      You were pretty clear there, so depsite trying to be charitable, I'll have to assume you mean that society is the final arbiter of moral right and wrong.

      That is an absurd position.

      Coming up with examples of societies that have done clear wrongs is trivial. I almost feel the need to pre-emptively invoke Godwin's Law here. Coming up with examples of societies that have tried to prevent members from doing clear good is trivial. Consider American Slavery. Consider the Civil Rights movement, especially in the 1950's and 60's.

      You might as well let society do your thinking for you. It's always right, after all.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    97. Re:Has anyone tried by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Society != civility. The first is a cultural hierarchy with behavior patterns. Civility by contract, is the capacity to live by behavioral constraints suitable to others, and not necessarily to society. Civil individuals who were highly critical of society include people like Eugene V Debs and Hunter S Thompson. Both were civil (although Thompson's use of drugs was certainly borderline) yet were anti-society (that is the society of their times) in major critical ways.

      Civility has always been a good thing. Society changes, and is commonly full of mistakes viewed historically. Civility has a long history of success. Societies (and cultures) come and go.

      Behaving responsibly is civil. Traveling in a high speed chase for 900mi to terrorize a rival lover is uncivil. It's also irresponsible to the self, and over the top in so many ways.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    98. Re:Has anyone tried by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Lately, that's started to resemble history in the making ;-\

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  2. nah by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In an unprecedented move for an unprecedented situation, NASA has fired now-former astronaut Lisa Nowack.

    It's not completely unprecedented. They fired the Challenger crew. I guess they just couldn't keep it together.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:nah by Exsam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too soon man, too soon.

      --
      "To face death, that's nothing much. But to feel really stupid when you die, well, that would be insufferable."
    2. Re:nah by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I laughed. It's very wrong, and the troll mod is probably not undeserved, but I laughed.

    3. Re:nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that it's the "Flamebait" mod that changes it from "wrong but funny" to "wrong but hilarous".

    4. Re:nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have 40% troll and 20% flamebait. I dunno, could you slip '40% retarded' in there somewhere?

    5. Re:nah by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      The parent's post doesn't seem a troll to me. How about some mods with common sense getting it off of that.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    6. Re:nah by deniable · · Score: 1

      21 years? It's old enough to drink.

    7. Re:nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been over 21 years. A generation of children not even born at that time is now having children of their own. How long does it need to be to not be "too soon".

    8. Re:nah by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, it takes 22.7 years for a major tragedy to become funny.

      Then again, "JEWS DID 911 LOL!!!!!!!!" is pretty damn funny, specifically because it's inflammatory in at least four ways.

      1) Anti-semitism. In itself, anti-semitism isn't funny. But absurd anti-semetic trolls are. Sorry, Jewish people, there's a lot of unfunny history of undeserved anti-Semitism. I don't disagree with that assessment of history. But it has probably affected you, a 20-30 something white male, a lot less than racism has affected 20-30 something black males. Or me, a 20-something male of unknown ethnic origin with a southern accent. And yet, anti-semitism is such an easy way to rile you up.

      2) Conspiracy theories are funny. Sure, the claim that the Jewish people is responsible for 9/11 is absurd, but there are plenty of theories that include at least a couple of Jewish people. Making them representatives of a whole people, without that people's consent, is funny. Especially since the Jewish people presumably responsible are unspecified.

      3) The "LOL!!!!!!!!!!" is funny, specifically because it makes the troll ambiguous. Was the troll acting in good faith and actually think the Jewish people were responsible? Or (4) was it just a brazen, juvenile troll?

      Ah, I'm sure I'll be modded down for this. That's not even a plea for karma. I see trolls as a kind of litmus test for people. The best ones are open ended, in the sense that they bring out many differing opposing opinions. "JEWS DID 911 LOL!!!!!!!" has a lot of potential in that regard.

      This is how a troll thinks. :-(

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  3. Unprecedented? by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I guess technically they've never fired an astronaut before, so it is "unprecedented" in that sense.

    But it's not like it's unusual to fire someone who is incapable of doing the job you hired them to do.

    Sensationalism at its "finest".

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Unprecedented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was she really incapable of doing the job? Sure she tried to kidnap someone but did that interfere with her work per se?

    2. Re:Unprecedented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all more proof that some jobs women are just not cut out for.

    3. Re:Unprecedented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just that she can't do her job (although, it's kind of hard to do your job when you're in jail). It's that she allegedly committed a felony. If on the off chance she's innocent, and it was just a case of mistaken identity, they'll have to hire her back, but committing a felony is a perfectly defensible reason for termination. Especially when the victim is an employee of the same organization.

    4. Re:Unprecedented? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, did she crash the shuttle? kill her crewmates in space? wreck the ISS? no, it seems like she did her job pretty darn well.

      For some reason you think her personal life is part of her job and mission.

      She was fired because she was an ebbarassment to NASA management for her actions outside work, she was NOT fired for being incapable of doing her job.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Unprecedented? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Actually, upon closer reading of the article, I now realize NASA doesn't have the resources to provide the necessary legal support. So they bumped her back to her parent organization, the U. S. Navy, which does have the necessary resources. Which, the more I think about it, is probably exactly as it should be. NASA is an underbudgeted aerospace R&D organization. If a Navy pilot gets into legal trouble while working on aerospace R&D projects for NASA, the right thing to do is to take them off the projects and send them back to their parent organization until their troubles are resolved.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    6. Re:Unprecedented? by AP2005 · · Score: 1

      Not fired, "fried".

    7. Re:Unprecedented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apollo 1, Challenger, Columbia... all "fired"

      You're going to hell. You know that, right?
    8. Re:Unprecedented? by Starburnt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I sure hope so. They have better music down there.

  4. Get out the Firehose! by agent · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Get out the Firehose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods need a sense of humor. :(

    2. Re:Get out the Firehose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't the mods -- the GP poster has low enough karma that his posts start at -1.

  5. Diapers saving time? by lothar97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One question about this whole thing that has bothered me is that she wore diapers to obviate the need for bathroom breaks. She drove 900 miles really fast, which meant she also had to refuel. Assuming great mileage, a large fuel tank, and a speedy car, she had to stop at least twice to gas. I'm not sure how much time would've been saved by stopping off in the loo. I think it tends to show more of how batty she is- which is good for her defense. Has anyone seen how long the trip actually took for her to drive?

    --

    1. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she's just really into wearing diapers.

    2. Re:Diapers saving time? by Astral+Jung · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, you've not seen very many gas station restrooms.

      --
      "What's so random about flipping a coin? Ever heard of the I Ching?"
    3. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're assuming her bladder capacity was well correlated to her fuel tank capacity.

      There's also the possible issue of lying in wait for her victim at the airport. It'd be terribly embarrasing to drive 900 miles in a blind rage to attack somebody, only to miss your chance due to an ill time potty break.

    4. Re:Diapers saving time? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I've taken a few cross-country driving trips in the 2,000 mile range, taking a 2-3 days to do it. In my '87 Tercel with all my posessions in the back I got around 35 mpg, with my range being about 350 miles. That means about 5-6 hours of continuous driving.

      Now I wouldn't stop except to refuel, except for once when it was simply too painful to keep driving. Women, in my experience, tend to need to go to the bathroom more often than once every 6 hours. Since every unecessary stop puts a severe ding in your average velocity, I could easily see wanting to do something to make the extra stops unecessary.

      Actually doing it is kinda nuts, though.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Diapers saving time? by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      It's been speculated that the diapers were for mopping up blood. Makes sense for a person with nerves and smarts to be checked out in 30 kinds of aircraft, to say nothing of the ISS.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    6. Re:Diapers saving time? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Astronauts use rocket fuel in their cars. It's an explosive blend with great mileage.

    7. Re:Diapers saving time? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One question about this whole thing that has bothered me is that she wore diapers to obviate the need for bathroom breaks.

      Although we can't be sure, I would guess that it was not to avoid wasting time, and was instead to avoid getting caught on camera. You can fill up your gas tank outside, but most gas stations these days have their WCs on the inside, and most of them have CCTV to take pretty pictures of you. If she was hoping to murder and dispose of her rival, she would absolutely not want any evidence that she had made a cross country trip around the time that the victim disappeared. Of course, most gas stations these days also have cameras watching the license plates of their customers to avoid drive-offs, but I guess she was improving her chances by not going inside.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the fact that it has electrolytes.... what cars crave!

    9. Re:Diapers saving time? by lothar97 · · Score: 1

      That is certainly a valid point, but I also seem to recall that she had already soiled two diapers on her own during the trip. Which means she went twice, and somehow quickly changed her diaper. I'm still wondering how long the entire trip took her, especially since she was driving to compete with a plane making the same trip.

      --

    10. Re:Diapers saving time? by iamacat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you think astronauts handle descent in landing capsules, long spacewalks or other situation where one might need to pee? What's bizarre to us, might be routine for people who go on unusual missions.

    11. Re:Diapers saving time? by FIT_Entry1 · · Score: 0

      Astronauts wear adult diapers during launches so this probably made a lot of sense to her. I have to admit I would not a person with her qualifications gunning for me, I think if she really intended to kill that woman they'd never find the body.

    12. Re:Diapers saving time? by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hadn't heard about the soiled part. My thought is some kind of organic brain problem (stroke, tumor, etc.) She profile's out as too smart and confident a person with a robust history. In terms of cognitive (in this case delusional) issues, the best predictor of what will happen is what has happened.

      Either that or the guy is hung like a coal-mine mule.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    13. Re:Diapers saving time? by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Who knows what the long wait on the launchpad followed by sudden acceleration does to somebody.

    14. Re:Diapers saving time? by linguizic · · Score: 1

      BEST MOVIE EVER!!!

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    15. Re:Diapers saving time? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Not that severe a hit though(depending on what you call severe).

      If you figure she could drive 350 miles on a tank, drove mostly at 70 mph and took about 10 minutes to pee(if you are determined enough to wear diapers, this isn't absurdly short), say every two hours or so, that means she would take 300 minutes to cover 350 miles just buying gas, and somewhere around 330 minutes peeing three times in those five hours. That's 70 mph just buying gas and 63.3 mph peeing. So out of every ten hours of driving, she saved an hour by wearing diapers.

      Over 900 miles, she saved something like 1.5 hours, unless she has a really small bladder(and only if she lacked any sort of sense of fluid management, which given her position is highly unlikely).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:Diapers saving time? by kwalker · · Score: 0

      Problem with that idea is that unless she used someone else's credit card to pay at the pump, she would have had to go inside to pay with cash, so she'd still end up on CCTV. That took all of 10 seconds of mental exertion to come up with, so if she's anywher near sane, she would have thought of that too.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    17. Re:Diapers saving time? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I think maybe you are overthinking this a little. Occam's Razor suggests it was just to save time. But maybe she had a diaper fetish, who knows. She's clearly nuts.

    18. Re:Diapers saving time? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Credit card trail? I have never seen a pay at the pump that took cash.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Diapers saving time? by lothar97 · · Score: 1

      Arco gas stations (at least in California) do not accept credit cards. They have kiosks which allow you to pay by cash into a machine. You also have the option of paying by debit card, but they charge you a transaction fee and you are thus tracked. Assuming she covered up her license plate in some manner, wore some type of disguise, and stopped at gas stations with automatic readers for cash purchases, she could've made the trip with a relatively small trail.

      --

    20. Re:Diapers saving time? by sn00ker · · Score: 2, Funny

      took about 10 minutes to pee
      Say what?! I don't take 10 minutes to lay a cable, never mind take a leak. Seriously, if your bladder was so large that you needed 10 minutes to empty it (including all the attendant activity) you could easily drive for 10 hours without having to stop. I've gone seven hours and 1.2L of water before it became a case of "Next rest stop, or a tree!", and that stop was still well below 10 minutes.

      Your calculations may be being generous, to be sure, but 10 minutes is excessive. Five would be closer to the truth in all but extreme cases. Particularly since I don't know anyone who would willingly linger in a petrol station bathroom!

      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
    21. Re:Diapers saving time? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I figure that you don't instantly decelerate five steps outside the door to the bathroom, and she is a woman, so she has to pee slow for no good reason.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    22. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Say what?! I don't take 10 minutes to lay a cable

      "That's for damn sure." - Mrs. Cable

    23. Re:Diapers saving time? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know that she in fact stopped at a gas station? If it were me I'd take my gas in cans in the trunk. I've got my gas with me, I've got my diapers. I haven't seen anywhere that she stopped at a gas station, or that she didn't just carry extra gas with her in the trunk.

      Maybe she was a backwoods hiker and thought of the trick of pre-placed cans of gas along the highway where she could grab them later. Good lord, it's not hard to be a criminal genius.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    24. Re:Diapers saving time? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      10 minutes to take a leak is ridiculous. 10 minutes overall for the entire stop is pretty much the bare minimum. From the time you pull onto the exit ramp, navigate the side roads to get to the gas station, park, get out, find the bathroom, wait for the key if necessary, wait for the room to be empty if necessary, do your business, get back to your car, drive back to the on-ramp, and get back up to highway speed, yeah, 10 minutes easy.

      In completely ideal cases -- the gas station is immediately at the end of the ramp, no traffic or traffic lights, the bathroom doesn't require a key, and there's nobody using it -- then yeah getting out in less than ten minutes is possible. In my experience it rarely is ideal, and yes I measured the time of my stops because I was trying to determine my overall speed.

      I will also bring up once again that this is a woman we are talking about, meaning a minimum 2x factor on required time in the rest room.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    25. Re:Diapers saving time? by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

      Has anyone asked her? Maybe she's been wearing them for years?

    26. Re:Diapers saving time? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or "usual" missions.
      Ask any 18-wheeler driver if they use a "piss jug"! When you are stuck in traffic, or have valuable cargo, or don't want to stop in a bad neighborhood, a plastic jug solves problems nicely.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    27. Re:Diapers saving time? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      What part of "she was half-crazed out of her mind and crazily planning a murder plot over 'the other woman'" to the point of being irrational. When you're collecting all the rubber tubing so you can properly tie up and sink a corpse, well, at that point you might as well start wearing a diaper. In that context it makes perfect sense.

      These are just irrational acts. Even if she did it, she would have been caught. No alibi and most likely witness.

    28. Re:Diapers saving time? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      She used rocket fuel in her car.

    29. Re:Diapers saving time? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I have you put the cash in before you pump

    30. Re:Diapers saving time? by digitig · · Score: 1

      One question about this whole thing that has bothered me is that she wore diapers to obviate the need for bathroom breaks. Normal behaviour for an astronaut. In space it's a long way between bathrooms. "You may think it's a long walk to the cornerstore" etc.
      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    31. Re:Diapers saving time? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      One question about this whole thing that has bothered me is that she wore diapers to obviate the need for bathroom breaks. She drove 900 miles really fast, which meant she also had to refuel. Assuming great mileage, a large fuel tank, and a speedy car, she had to stop at least twice to gas. I'm not sure how much time would've been saved by stopping off in the loo. I think it tends to show more of how batty she is- which is good for her defense. Has anyone seen how long the trip actually took for her to drive?


      Assuming a vehicle with a range of 350 miles on a full tank, and an average speed of 50 miles per hour, that's one stop every 7 hours. I think that'd be rough on most people, assuming normal hydration. I think most people on such a journey would stop for biological reasons more often than they stop for fuel.

      And really, not stopping to pee is not uncommon for people who drive long distances. Witness the growing problem of "Trucker Bombs" -- truckers urinating in disposable containers, and throwing them out the window when full. The astronaut in question may well have opted for the same strategy, if only she'd been gifted with the blessing of external genitalia.
    32. Re:Diapers saving time? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every gas station I've been at has the ability to program the pump to only dispense X dollars worth of gas. It's not quite the same as pay at the pump, but there's nothing to stop you from going in, handing over a $20 bill and telling them you're at pump 4, and going back and pumping your gas. Doesn't take very long at all to go in and prepay at the counter, and some of them insist you do that anyway, late at night.

      Most gas stations also don't care much about security after you've paid for the gas. They're worried about people committing crimes, and as far as they're concerned, you haven't stolen from them if you don't point a gun at the guy behind the counter, and if you don't pump 'n dash.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    33. Re:Diapers saving time? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      She's an astronaut. Wearing diapers is probably part of her job description (when the closest bathroom is 100s of miles below you). If you are used to wearing diapers at work (and probably suggested to use the diapers so you know how they feel), it's not unreasonable to wear them off-hours.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    34. Re:Diapers saving time? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Credit card trail? I have never seen a pay at the pump that took cash.

      They are common enough. Usually there's a bill reader on the island serving 4 pumps.
      Seen them in 7 or 8 states.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    35. Re:Diapers saving time? by maxume · · Score: 1

      The post I replied to was talking about avoiding cameras; you don't do that if you go in the store. I haven't paid cash for gas in like 4 years, so I haven't even been looking, but I really haven't noticed cash readers as being 'common enough to plan on while driving to kill a rival'.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    36. Re:Diapers saving time? by dr_strang · · Score: 1

      Those are called 'trucker bombs' and they're a problem because the truckers just chuck them out of the windows onto the side of the road.

      --
      This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
    37. Re:Diapers saving time? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Problem with that idea is that unless she used someone else's credit card to pay at the pump, she would have had to go inside to pay with cash, so she'd still end up on CCTV. That took all of 10 seconds of mental exertion to come up with, so if she's anywher near sane, she would have thought of that too.

      At many AM/PMs and some Arcos i've seen, you can pay cash outside most of the time. I use this feature often enough. But such gas stations tend to have cameras at the pumps. TFA didn't speak of gas stations, and we are dealing with a military person which to be fair tend to be trained to be hard core practical people. This tend to mean spair tire, extra tanks of gas, that sort of thing.

      This being said, I have done some road tips in my time. Seattle to San Jose, Seattle to LA, Seattle to San Diago. I can't say I never used a diaper, but I never had a job where I would were one. I can say I did cut down on time sticking the pump in the tank, paying inside, pump automaticly starts once payment is made, used the bathroom, and went along my way, or the same in states like Oregon where they have to have a trained professional pump your gas for you. But regular bathroom breaks aside from fuel stops are a good idea. Lack of them may cut down on your travel time, but you do so at the risk of being hypnotized by those lines on the road.

      But these are the thoughts of sane rational people, not those who are caught up in a bizarre love triangle.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    38. Re:Diapers saving time? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      she had to stop at least twice to gas. I'm not sure how much time would've been saved by stopping off in the loo.

      It's clear nobody else here on /. has ever gone on a road trip with a woman.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    39. Re:Diapers saving time? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It'd be terribly embarrasing to drive 900 miles in a blind rage to attack somebody, only to miss your chance due to an ill time potty break.

      Embarrassing? Embarrassing!?!? She drove cross country with a mallet and BB gun, wearing a diaper. I don't think embarrassment was at the top of her list.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    40. Re:Diapers saving time? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      When you are stuck in traffic, or have valuable cargo, or don't want to stop in a bad neighborhood, a plastic jug solves problems nicely.

      Actually, it's mainly because trucks have far larger gas tanks (and run on diesel) so can go many more hours between stops than cars.

      If trucks had to stop every 6 hours to refill, you'd never have heard of trucker bombs.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    41. Re:Diapers saving time? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      She drove 900 miles really fast, which meant she also had to refuel.... I'm not sure how much time would've been saved by stopping off in the loo.

      I have another theory. A 2-day-old used diaper can be used to sufficate and affixiate somebody as a back-up to her primary weapon.

    42. Re:Diapers saving time? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I don't think a criminal genius does their abduction at a PUBLIC AIRPORT.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    43. Re:Diapers saving time? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Do you know that she in fact stopped at a gas station?

      Good point. Maybe we'll find that out after her trial.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    44. Re:Diapers saving time? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      I don't think a criminal genius does their abduction at a PUBLIC AIRPORT.

      Why not? Huge parking lot. Lots of potential suspects coming and going. Did the victim ever make it back to her car? All kinds of interesting questions. But anyway, nobody said she was a genius. Planning your attack and covering SOME of the bases is normal behavior for somebody who has reached the irrational point.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    45. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 gallon fuel tank, 32 miles per gallon, that's 1 fillup, not 2, if you're topped off when you start. Note that 32mpg on a highway isn't great mileage, nor is a 15 gallon tank particularly large (2 Dodge Neons (compact, not subcompact) for example have had 12 gallon tanks).

      Also, if you're speeding, you actually get better mpg; this strikes most people as incorrect given all the government stuff about gas saving and driving slower, but the reality is, I've had 4 vehicles get better mpg at 80mpg than at 65. I'm not sure the particular reasons why (less static friction due to less tire deformation; engines run hotter and combustion is more efficient; the original efficiency studies were just wrong or propaganda). On 2 hour trips for roughly 135 miles, we're talking 1-2 gallons difference, and I know this has held up in 4 cylinders and V6s.

    46. Re:Diapers saving time? by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much time would've been saved by stopping off in the loo. Well Sherlock, That would depend on the type of activity in the loo, would it not?
    47. Re:Diapers saving time? by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you've not seen very many gas station restrooms. Especially not in west bumblefuck alabama

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
    48. Re:Diapers saving time? by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      Ask any 18-wheeler driver if they use a "piss jug"! Or a diaper!
    49. Re:Diapers saving time? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Too bad she wasn't a guy. Any trucker could tell you about the great time saver known as the empty jug.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    50. Re:Diapers saving time? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It's critical in establishing that the victim was at a certain time and location. The arrival time of her flight is well known, and it would be known that the victim was on the flight.

      I'd bet that Diaper Lisa had a similar rock-solid alibi on her end too, establishing that she was in Houston at a specific time. She was diaper-driving because she hoped that the too-short trip would throw doubt on her involvement, either during the investigation or the court case.

      My advice to you is to obey the law until you've watched ALL the Columbo rerun episodes.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    51. Re:Diapers saving time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she were worried about being seen going into a gas station bathroom, why couldn't she just pull over and use a tree? It wouldn't take long, no more than a few minutes for a stop.

  6. Well then. by Jello+B. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ms. Nowack is a Navy officer and remains so.


    Navy has low standards.
    1. Re:Well then. by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      It takes a while to fire a Navy captain (equivalent of a Colonel in the other services). I'm sure she'll be "asked to retire" as soon as the civilian court proceedings are over with.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:Well then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she will be court-martialed for conduct unbecoming if nothing else, then dishonorably discharged. I think this is too serious to be subject to administrative justice executed by her commanding officer (the other option for some military offenses).

    3. Re:Well then. by cmowire · · Score: 1

      I suspect that, thanks to Star Trek, most geeks are more familiar with naval ranks than ground-pounder ranks. :P

    4. Re:Well then. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Lucky she's not a man. Instead of being a misunderstood, stressed-out astronaut who needs some TLC, she'd be a *monster* charged with attempted *murder* being held in prison until trial and then given a life sentence.

      Sad that our society has devolved to the point where missions exploring the universe and potentially saving mankind are ignored, but a kooky employee makes headlines for months.

    5. Re:Well then. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Agreed, kidnapping is definitely way, Way, WAY above the level where an Article 15 is still an option. If either kidnapping or attempted murder charges seem appropriate, she will get either a 3 or a 5 person board, probably all higher ranking officers (There is an option for an enlisted person to have at least 1 NCO on the board at the defendant's request, but that shouldn't apply for a Captain, if the Navy court martial is anything like the Army or Air Force ones). At least, there's no possibility of the death penalty. I'd just about bet she'll eventually be court martialed, by a board consisting of two Navy Captains senior to her in date of rank, and chaired by a light Admiral. Maybe they'll squeeze a Commodore in there somewhere. (Does the Navy still have those?)
            Note: I am not a military lawyer. I base this only on a former comissioned officer's general familiarity with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, as taught by the Army, not the Navy.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  7. Why is this odd? by LordPhantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not like this is strange. She's under investigation for a felony... I'm pretty sure that disqualifies her from flying on the space shuttle. If not that, the fact that she's a certifiable whackjob.

    As for her remaining a Navy officer, I suspect she'll get a second (please forgive the pun here) dishonorable discharge after the dust settles.

    1. Re:Why is this odd? by nofx911 · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to NASA the felony investigation is only a fraction of the problem. She is technically on lone from the Navy - which means that she is only allowed to work in certain roles that the Navy has pre-authorized for her. Since she can not participate in those roles, due to her current legal obligations (shes not allowed outside of Houston), there is nothing that she can do within NASA. Henceforth, NASA has no choice other than releasing her.

    2. Re:Why is this odd? by joke-boy · · Score: 1

      It's not like this is strange. She's under investigation for a felony... I'm pretty sure that disqualifies her from flying on the space shuttle.

      Why? It's not like she's a flight risk...
    3. Re:Why is this odd? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      What has our country become when comitting a felony disqualifies you from flying the shuttle but not from becoming a president?

    4. Re:Why is this odd? by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

      She is technically on lone from the Navy

      I believe you meant, "one loon from the Navy."

    5. Re:Why is this odd? by kabz · · Score: 1

      I thought you said she *wasn't* Canadian.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  8. Who's "Nowack"? by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... NASA has fired now-former astronaut Lisa Nowack ...

    No, they fired Lisa Nowak. I know this is Slashdot, and I'm not new here ... but Christ, is it that hard to do a little basic spell-checking?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:Who's "Nowack"? by seyyah · · Score: 1

      So you must be using a Polish spell-checker, right? My lousy English one didn't pick up either Nowack or Nowak. Strange.

    2. Re:Who's "Nowack"? by Peyre · · Score: 1

      Good spotting. I'm glad someone pointed it out. All this news about astronauts and the Shuttle makes me want to go back to the Moon (http://www.geocities.com/raceintospace/index.htm) ...

    3. Re:Who's "Nowack"? by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you find that life is frustrating living as a prik?
      There, fixed that for you. :)
  9. tossed out an airlock by SuperBanana · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow. Now her life is completely destroyed. Way to go, guys. Presuming she doesn't go to jail or a mental institution, you couldn't have found somewhere for her to work at NASA, given how big NASA is? Or waited until she was proven guilty, at the least?

    Especially since it's your training program that caused the breakdown in the first place, most likely?

    Talk about getting tossed out an airlock. NASA could have taken the high road on this one, and it's pretty obvious they took the easiest-for-them road. Circle the wagons, protect the budget.

    Sends a real clear message to the other astronauts/candidates, though.

    1. Re:tossed out an airlock by darius779 · · Score: 1

      What company wouldn't fire someone after they brutally attacked a coworker?

    2. Re:tossed out an airlock by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      you couldn't have found somewhere for her to work at NASA, given how big NASA is?

      Yeah, it's not like there are hundreds of qualified people who would love to work at NASA, waiting for their shot or anything.

      --
      We are all just people.
    3. Re:tossed out an airlock by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you're saying that NASA should keep someone totally unqualified for any kind of high-stress, high-risk work on the payroll?

      Besides, it's more like she's a Navy pilot seconded to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for space research projects. If she's no longer suited to work on such projects, the right thing to do is to take her off those projects and return her to her regular Navy pilot duties--or such of those duties as her parent organization finds her still fit to perform. It's not like NASA tossed her out on the street.

      Also, this is the first time an Astronaut has "snapped" like this. How do you know it's the training program, and not a personality quirk in the candidate? Astronauts are typically chosen from among a pool of people who have already proven their aptitude for high-stress, high-risk work. Most of the candidates eithe wash out or pass through the qualification tests. The ones that pass through almost never snap, but as manning increases, the occasional ringer is bound to slip through. The right thing to do is not to keep the ringer, but to wash them out as soon as you become aware of them.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    4. Re:tossed out an airlock by mikelieman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Don't fool yourself, NASA ain't the shining boy who once, long ago, sent people to strange and interesting places like the Moon.

      Today they are just another Federal bureaucracy. The goals are a) Hire Government Employees and b) CYA c) Oversee contracts. Any success is purely accidental.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    5. Re:tossed out an airlock by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that, because a few weeks ago NASA said they stood in support of her. Wonder what changed their minds.

    6. Re:tossed out an airlock by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Besides, it's more like she's a Navy pilot seconded to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for space research projects. If she's no longer suited to work on such projects, the right thing to do is to take her off those projects and return her to her regular Navy pilot duties
      FTFA:
      NASA said it requested Nowak's detail be ended "because the agency lacks the administrative means to deal appropriately with the criminal charges pending against Nowak. Because Nowak is a naval officer on assignment to NASA, rather than a NASA civil servant, she is not subject to administrative action by NASA."

      In other words, NASA's only option (other than doing nothing) is to fire her.

      As for the quality of people NASA takes into their program, they're mostly products of the Navy/Army Test Pilot School. Even the engineers (like this crazy robotic arm operator) went to test pilot school.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:tossed out an airlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. What is so fucking special about being an astronaught? If this was ANY other professionl you wouldn't bat an eye. If it was Jose working at KFC who got in his car and drove 900 miles in diapers to (allegedly) kill "the other man" he would be fired and probably held in jail. If an astronaught murders somebody do they deserve special treatment, too? Give me a fucking break. Yes, it's a highly specialized field, but there are plenty of qualified candidates out there to fill her spot. And how on Earth is this NASA's fault? Maybe they could have screened their people better (and filtered her out), but to blame her mental breakdown on them is ridiculous. It's high time we took back a sense of personal responsibility. Or was it Grand Theft Auto that drove little Johnny to kill all those people?

    8. Re:tossed out an airlock by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      A lot of astronauts have snapped. Several have severe depression and other mental illnesses

    9. Re:tossed out an airlock by PoopDaddy · · Score: 1

      Maybe she was a crappy astronaut to boot.

    10. Re:tossed out an airlock by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Presuming she doesn't go to jail or a mental institution, you couldn't have found somewhere for her to work at NASA, given how big NASA is?

      Why? I wasn't aware there were really any facts in dispute here. She's clearly totally bonkers, and being an Astronaut is not a job where being bonkers is welcome. If she were a hollywood actress on the other hand, it'd be an asset.

      Especially since it's your training program that caused the breakdown in the first place, most likely?

      Err.. what? I know it's fun to just make up theories without a shred of evidence to support them. But it's not something that often leads to the truth. I think we can safetly ignore your supposition.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:tossed out an airlock by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I see what your saying, but here is an interesting fact:
      It is not uncommon for someone in space to go bonkers.

      Tehre have been reports of little green men, on guy shut off all communication to the space station, there have been fist fights(which I would love to see footage of).

      There is a book that talks about this, but I can't remember the name of it. Sorry.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:tossed out an airlock by markana · · Score: 1

      How about the lives she destroyed by her actions? You would think that the geeky Slashdot crowd would have some sympathy for an engineer whose wife was sneaking around chasing a jock - and a married one at that (at the time this all started). And then planning on dumping her husband for the jerk. And remeber, she was after Oefelein for years - this wasn't a sudden breakdown caused by stress.

      By all accounts, Rich Norwak was a likeable guy, so it's not like she was fleeing an abusive relationship. It looks like she was just tired of the nice, safe guy, and wanted the exciting, glamorous pilot. What was she planning on doing with the kids? In a lot of these situations, the new boyfriend tends not to want the previous guy's kids around.

      If she had just quietly left the marriage to chase after Oefelein, it would have been hard enough on the kids. I can't imagine the hell they're going to go through in the years ahead, because of their mother's selfishness.

      She deserves what she gets.

    13. Re:tossed out an airlock by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Also, this is the first time an Astronaut has "snapped" like this.

      Wasn't there some guy that snapped on Mir on a joint USA/Russia mission and refused to help fix the thing? At the time it became clear that there was no psychological testing in NASA.

    14. Re:tossed out an airlock by nicknack · · Score: 1

      Sends a real clear message to the other astronauts/candidates, though. yeah, if they're going to be such dicks over someone going berzerk in her spare time...then they'll probably look for a more easy-going space agency.
    15. Re:tossed out an airlock by caluml · · Score: 1

      When the Mir Space Station was still up, you could listen to the comms downlink on 143.625MHz FM for a few minutes every few hours as it passed overhead.
      It was quite strange listening to these Russian guys, whizzing round the Earth in a tin can, up there for weeks and weeks, just checking numbers (parameters) with the ground crew. You then realise that if you wanted to go for a short walk, or down to the shops, or to buy a beer, or ogle a few women, you could - but they can't. They're just stuck, up there, hoping that nothing goes wrong, and that someone will come and get them when their time's up.

  10. Don't leave town. by no_pets · · Score: 1

    When you're under investigation, or at least in the movies, they tell you not to leave town. Perhaps they just don't want her leaving the planet.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  11. well by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    I figured she already had been fired. Has she even denied the charges?

    1. Re:well by Ankur+Dave · · Score: 1

      Yes, she has. She pled not guilty in advance (before the trial, that is).

    2. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She hasn't denied the story, as far as I know. She has denied the charges.

      The charges are for assault, attempted kidnapping, and (now dropped) attempted murder.

      From what I've heard, she doesn't deny driving 900 miles wearing a diaper and carrying a BB gun and some rubber hose (none of that is illegal, BTW), or confronting the other woman, and probably doesn't deny using the pepper spray (assault). She does deny trying to kidnap or kill her and has said she "just wanted to talk." She may have had a fit of utterly irrational and inappropriate behavior, but I don't think she's stupid. If she's got half a brain, she'll plea guilty to assault and fight the kidnapping charge down to something lesser. She'll serve some jail time, probably be discharged from the military, and then try to pick up the shattered pieces she made of her life and her dignity.

  12. NASA's shuttle replacement? by dacut · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oefelein told investigators he and Nowak both served on the bicycling team at NASA... Man, I know NASA is strapped for cash, but bicycles?

    1. Re:NASA's shuttle replacement? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      They were looking to a new cost efficient low orbit altitude vehicle with an environmental appeal.

    2. Re:NASA's shuttle replacement? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Man, I know NASA is strapped for cash, but bicycles?

      If you don't stay super fit you won't fly. That was the case from Mercury onwards and most of the astronauts ran long dstances every day. Running is cheaper than riding a bike so would you accuse them of being really cheap? BTW I ride a bike to work and its the best way I know to stay healthy, as well as being slightly cheaper than taking public transport.

    3. Re:NASA's shuttle replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW I ride a bike to work and its the best way I know to stay healthy, as well as being slightly cheaper than taking public transport.

      Well, it's a great way to stay healthy until you have a collision with an automobile.

  13. how about by popisdead · · Score: 0

    Canada's Female astronaut has 'not' committed crimes or had a need to be fired.

    1. Re:how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. I'm sure she's looking forward to the day Canada gets a spacecraft.

  14. Innocent until proven guilty? by bobbonomo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Innocent until proven guilty! So much for that belief. Eh?

    1. Re:Innocent until proven guilty? by MLease · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That only applies to criminal trials (at least in theory; the principle does seem to be weakening these days). Cause for firing someone or for prevailing in a civil suit doesn't require that high a standard. What she did do, even if she hasn't formally been found guilty of the charges against her, constituted conduct unbecoming someone in her position. Dismissing her from the Navy might require a conviction or a court-martial, but they certainly have cause to kick her out of the astronaut corps.

      -Mike

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
    2. Re:Innocent until proven guilty? by KenStech · · Score: 0

      I think people are missing the point with the whole diaper thing. It's the reason she was originally charged with attempted murder, which I think was entirely justified.

      She could have taken a plane to Orlando just like Capt. Shipman did, so why didn't she? The fact is, she could have flown herself in her NASA issued T-38 jet, so why didn't she? She knew the plans of Shipman for a long time. She was in fact stalking Shipman for weeks, and she could have been waiting in Orlando long before Shipman got there. So why did she rush off wearing a diaper so that she could get there just in time to meet Shipman at the airport (remember, Nowack knew where Shipman lived)?

      What people are missing here is that Nowack wanted plausible deniability. If She had taken a plane, or flown herself, it would have left a paper trail. Instead she chose to drive the 900 mile distance, pay for everthing in cash and wear a disguise so that she would not be recognized.

      Nowak had a Mapquest map that showed the path from Houston to Orlando. But Nowak didn't need to know how to get there, she has been back and forth many times, and besides she used the interstate. What she needed from Mapquest was the TIME. The estimated times used by Mapquest and others are based on average travel times for the average person.

      Nowak no doubt thought that if she could wear a diaper, she could beat those times. Thus, if she were ever questioned after the fact, she could plausibly claim that she wouldn't have had the time to make the trip. No doubt she would have put in a conspicuous appearance somewhere after the fact in order to give herself an alibi. This demonstrates that she was already thinking ahead to having to defend herself.

      The only way this makes sense is if she planned on murdering Shipman. P

      Ken

    3. Re:Innocent until proven guilty? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm.... Her IQ must be around 140 or something. Too smart. But if she had waited for somemore time without losing patience, she would be a cold-blooded...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  15. Yeah, it's a darn shame. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    NASA could have been kinder. Whatever her situation, losing her paycheck isn't going to reduce the stress on her or help her recover.

    How's NASA going to look if it turns out that her bizarre behavior was the result of something like a brain tumor?

    Can't even imagine what her kids are going to make of it all.

  16. Navy responsible for her next assignment? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Flying helicopters. In Anbar province.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  17. Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by deft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Has anyone tried listening to her side of the story?"

    has anyone tried to listen to it without laughing... thats the hard part.

    What I love about this story is she gets aaa wig, everything you need to kill and torture someone, drives forever to meet her... and the weird part is diapers that isnt weird for her or her job... like none of that other stuff bothers anyone.

    Clearly, we are desensitized to murder and all that... but adult diapers really gets us.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because any human with a heart can at least understand the jealous lover who decides to take out the competition even if we'd never actually do it. That's a story as ancient as mankind, something which outside of the immediacy is completely banal.

      The diapers are what make it weird.

      Of course the rest bothers lots of people, it just doesn't make you stop and go "huh?" like hearing she drove cross country wearing diapers does.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      I mean, really, it's 900 miles, just speed up a bit the next leg, stop, and taking a piss like a normal person.

    3. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by Runefox · · Score: 1

      That's because natural bodily functions are wholly taboo in our society, and thus, become a form of humour in that they're generally unspeakable in most non-vulgar social situations.

      "OLOL SHE WENT PEE PEE AND POO POO IN HER FANNY SHE IS SUCH A RETURD LOL GET IT RETURD?!111 OLOLOOLOLOLOLO!!!!!11111!!shiftone"

      --
      Screw the rules, I have green hair!
    4. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by webview · · Score: 1

      What I love about this story is she gets aaa wig, everything you need to kill and torture someone, drives forever to meet her... and the weird part is diapers that isnt weird for her or her job... like none of that other stuff bothers anyone.

      Yeah it wasn't a big surprise for me. I thought about it and I am sure astronauts wear some form of diapers as a regular activity (well, when in space). She definitely didn't want to be spotted on her 'trip there' -- didn't have to stop much along the way--she is a shuttle astronaut, I am sure someone could have recognized her.

    5. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I would bet she didn't want to be seen or identified. Not stopping helps with that.

      While she may be completely nuts, she should be very smart. They don't employ monkeys in space missions since the 50s.

    6. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      While she may be completely nuts, she should be very smart. They don't employ monkeys in space missions since the 50s.

      Right, because the the obvious thing I forgot to mention that makes this kinda, you know, weird: She's an astronoaut!

      Which ties in to the diaper thing. Again, weird.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Yeah, I've tried, but thats not the question. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        So... should I consider myself disturbed if the diaper thing made perfect sense to me the first time I read about it? ;)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  18. How could they *not* fire someone for this!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many companies *won't* fire you if you're arrested for a felony?

    Granted, they'll probably fire you for the unexcused absence from work, but still...

    1. Re:How could they *not* fire someone for this!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, add up the companies who don't want to get sued for unlawful termination of employment (or somesuch similar, in most sensible systems, you can't just stop employing someone at whim) - being arrested is NOT a crime.

      Having been arrested is hardly 'unexcused'. The sheer quantity of PR egg on a company's face if it were to fire someone for being arrested who turned out to be innocent would make enron weep!

  19. Re:RTFA by Bastian · · Score: 1

    She was shuffled over to another job, it's just that it's a Navy position rather than another NASA one. That's because she doesn't work for NASA. She officially works for the Navy and was assigned to do astronaut detail for NASA.

  20. Only on slashdot..... by Chineseyes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only on slashdot would you have someone question the logic of a nutcase wearing diapers in order to avoid taking bathroom breaks.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  21. Mod AC parent up! by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Should you get fired from your cashiers job just because you got fined for speeding?

    sure, kidnapping is a more serious event, but the two are just as much unrelated.

    That said... I'm pretty sure that NASA doesn't allow anybody with a criminal record on their astronaut staff, and so wouldn't have a choice.

    1. Re:Mod AC parent up! by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except for the fact that speeding has nothing to do with cashiering, yet sanity has EVERYTHING to do with cramped quarters with other people for long periods of time.

    2. Re:Mod AC parent up! by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Should you get fired from your cashiers job just because you got fined for speeding?


      No, but you should get fired if you're arrested for planning to murder a coworker's girlfriend.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  22. Diapers aren't really odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that she's an astronaut. They're used to having to use... unusual accommodations for basic needs such as this for a mission. You know - you can't really take off your suit when you've got to go. So I assume that it's a holdover from her space training.

  23. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cosmonaut fires YOU!

  24. +5 Awesome by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find that it's the "Flamebait" mod that changes it from "wrong but funny" to "wrong but hilarous".

    Yeah, I guess some people are still pretty broken up over the whole Challenger thing.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:+5 Awesome by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Funny

      It blew their minds...

    2. Re:+5 Awesome by User+956 · · Score: 1, Funny

      It blew their minds...

      Yeah, those were the days when spaceflight was really booming.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:+5 Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were the last words from Challenger?

      Nooooo! Bud Light!

  25. I guess what this means... by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 1

    ...is that even though NASA can't afford the search for the killer asteroid, they can apparently afford the search for the killer astronaut.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
  26. Nowack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowack? More like Yeswack.

  27. Not just any bicycles by patio11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're custom-made from Lockheed Martin, spent 8 years in development each at a cost of $650 million, use military-grade titanium frames and have wheels made up of 65,000 tiny sheets of vulcanized rubber which are handmade and then painstakingly knit together to best resist wear-and-tear with the road. They're only used for serious scientific business, like carrying a mouse in the basket to see what the physiological changes are to a mouse riding a bicycle. It was determined that the changes are rather similar to what a mouse experiences in low-gravity: not much, and if you give him cheese he really couldn't care less.

    Plans to retest using a hamster and sunflower seeds were scrapped after the bike was totaled in a training accident. (A NASA bicycle rider on loan from the Air Force attempted to take the bicycle over a 3 inch curb, which should have been within the 5 inch tolerance level of the suspension. Unfortunately, one of NASA's subcontractors designed for 5 cm tolerance level instead, and after the suspension exceeded tolerance it folded like only a $600 million can can.)

    NASA is now submitting a proposal for a better, more expensive bicycle to continue their important scientific mission. $1 billion is slated for testing the suspension under a variety of stressful conditions, and as much as $2.50 is slated for experimental apparati for measuring the responses of the hamster.

    1. Re:Not just any bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're custom-made from Lockheed Martin, spent 8 years in development each at a cost of $650 million, use military-grade titanium frames and have wheels made up of 65,000 tiny sheets of vulcanized rubber which are handmade and then painstakingly knit together to best resist wear-and-tear with the road.

      LOL where do I sign?

    2. Re:Not just any bicycles by basneder · · Score: 0

      I am betting you copied that information straight from wikipedia!

  28. Not unrelated at all... by JacksBrokenCode · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should you get fired from your cashiers job just because you got fined for speeding?

    Better question: Would you let somebody with obvious mental instability babysit your $1.3 billion kid?

    1. Re:Not unrelated at all... by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you gave me $1.3 billion for my kid, I might consider it.

    2. Re:Not unrelated at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daryl is that you? Still trying to raise money for your company?

    3. Re:Not unrelated at all... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Should you get fired from your cashiers job just because you got fined for speeding?
      Better question: Would you let somebody with obvious mental instability babysit your $1.3 billion kid?


      Now I want to know how many "rich"/"extremely wealthy" people hire mentally unstable "nannies"/"tutors" for their billionaire heirs.

    4. Re:Not unrelated at all... by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Better question: Would you let somebody with obvious mental instability babysit your $1.3 billion kid?

      Good question. The GDP of the United States is $12.98 trillion according to The CIA, but we still have Bush.

  29. They fired her... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...out of a cannon, into the sun.

  30. Pampers, bitches. by LibertineR · · Score: 4, Funny
    The chick was sporting Pampers when NASA officially endorses Depends.

    She had to go. Were it the NBA, they could have just fined her, or sent her to rehab, but.....

    1. Re:Pampers, bitches. by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      NASA officially endorses Depends.

      Is the Hubble Space Telescope going to survive? Depends.

      Are we going to be returning to the moon ever? Depends.

      Are we sending any humans to Mars? Depends.

    2. Re:Pampers, bitches. by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      Someone actually got the fuckin joke!

  31. You know the downside to by geekoid · · Score: 1

    not reading the article is that you make your self look like a fool...in this case a particularly stupid fool.

    She didn't actually work for NASA, she is a naval officer.

    "Especially since it's your training program that caused the breakdown in the first place, most likely?"

    not likely. It was probably many other factors. Like a failing marriage.

    "NASA could have taken the high road on this one, and it's pretty obvious they took the easiest-for-them road."

    No, NASA has no way to deal with this situation, so the said to the Navy "Here you go, you can have her back" so the Navy can deal with the legal issues.

    "Sends a real clear message to the other astronauts/candidates, though."
    It sure does, is says "If you are from the armed forces assigned to NASA and you commit a crime, we're going to send you back to the armed force branch you are on loan from."

    It also says, "If you life is going to hell, talk to us about it so we can help."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. NASA Fires Astronaut... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    ...Into space!

  33. Not necessarily... by LinDVD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Getting fired from the Federal Government is generally tough-especially if you are prior military. Unlike private industry, it requires TONS of paperwork, and/or an extraordinary event. You have to really fuck up to get canned. Typically, the way to deal with a problem employee is to promote them into another department or position-that is usually how it is done. This is one reason why the Federal Government has some seriously mismatched people in certain positions. Also, the closer you are to retirement, the less likely they will actually fire you. You can be marginalized, but you won't get fired very easily. Some branches of the military are cracking down on some bad behavior. For example, the US Coast Guard will fire you if you get yourself a DUI as a civilian, and if you are active duty you COULD get two DUI's (pending a board review) before being fired, but that's it. On the flip side, you could be a lazy bum and be a low productivity worker for decades, and probably make it to retirement while being paid moderately well.

    The line of separation for GS positions typically stops at the GS-12 level-there are still some incompetent workers at the 13, 14 and 15 levels, but the numbers are far fewer, because at those levels incompetency and general specialist/management efficiency becomes blurred.

    Note, there is a little hope on the horizon-the Federal Government IS though moving some jobs away from the GS classification into a new pay banding system that rewards you based on performance, but unions are suing to slow down the change over with mixed results. That's why some job postings say GS and others have the new classification. Under the new pay banding, the probability of getting fired doesn't change much, but it is harder to move up if you are a bad worker.

    --
    Just because you get modded "insightful" on Slashdot doesn't mean you actually are in real life.
    1. Re:Not necessarily... by josecanuc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Getting fired from the Federal Government is generally tough-especially if you are prior military.

      To be sure, she isn't "prior military". She is a current Navy officer formerly on assignment to NASA. As far as paperwork goes, she is just reassigned out of NASA, since the Navy is still her administrator and she hasn't been discharged (yet).

    2. Re:Not necessarily... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      since the Navy is still her administrator and she hasn't been discharged (yet).
      That would be an interesting court-martial to see.
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  34. Unprecedented? by Starburnt · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA has fired astronauts before, people. Apollo 1, Challenger, Columbia... all "fired" for various reasons. /...17 in the ashtray

  35. If anyone ever earned the title "Insensitive Clod" by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1, Insightful


    ...you just did.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  36. By any chance, is your last name Nowak? by JacksBrokenCode · · Score: 1

    Wow. Now her life is completely destroyed. Way to go, guys. Presuming she doesn't go to jail or a mental institution, you couldn't have found somewhere for her to work at NASA, given how big NASA is? Or waited until she was proven guilty, at the least?

    I agree that they should've at least waited until she is found guilty in court, but to lambast NASA for firing an employee who exhibited this behavior is ridiculous. She went crazy and tried to kidnap a person. The responsibility for this decision is Nowak's alone so to claim that anybody else is trying to destroy her life is absurd. NASA has no obligation to unconditionally accept any dangerous behavior from its employees and reposition them if they become unfit for their original assignments.

    Especially since it's your training program that caused the breakdown in the first place, most likely?

    Got any proof of that?

    Talk about getting tossed out an airlock. NASA could have taken the high road on this one, and it's pretty obvious they took the easiest-for-them road. Circle the wagons, protect the budget.

    Protecting the budget or other employees? You seem to be ignoring the fact that Nowak drove 900 miles in a diaper to try and kidnap a woman who was dating a man that dumped her. Imagine what she'll do to the bitch who borrows her stapler too many times and sits right next to her.

    The fact that you got modded "Insightful" only shows that /. is populated by too many people with little/no real world experience.

  37. Fired...Out of a Cannon...Into the Sun... by Lensar · · Score: 1

    She got off easy!

    1. Re:Fired...Out of a Cannon...Into the Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no she didn't. That's why he went after the other chick.

  38. Astro-Nut Fired by Known+Brave · · Score: 1

    ...and they've shown restraint. They didn't throw her out the Shuttle!

  39. She was an avid sportswoman... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    The asstronaut was an avid sportswoman. She played a lot of badminton. Apparently she was always trying to score with the shuttlecock ;-)

    Thanks ladies and gentlemen... I'm here all week!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  40. Honor, sanity. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She is an Officer of the United States Navy. (And, yes, to people associated with the military, that means a hell of a lot.) When you're an officer, you get held to higher standards, because you hold in your hands the honor of the US military. It's well known and accepted that that includes your behavior off the clock.

    When you're assigned to prestigious duty in the name of the Unites States of America, you better damn well be spotless, because you're holding the honor of the country in your hands.

    And that's not even thinking about whether behaving poorly under emotional stress should disqualify you from things like spending six months in only a couple tens of meters of cubic space with other people. That kind of contact would drive normal people insane; Astronauts have to be more stable than a concrete slab.

  41. This just in... by FMota91 · · Score: 0

    Company fires Employee! ... etc

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C1 bottles of beer on the wall. Take one down, pass it round... Oh, umm...
  42. already has had bad effects on society by finlandia1869 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the officers I work with has coined a new phrase: "I've got astronaut love for you, man!" I can't being to express how wrong that is. Just wrong.

  43. Adds a little light... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

    ...to the phrase "Your mother's an astronaut!"

    1. Re:Adds a little light... by pkarlos_76 · · Score: 1

      You mean astronut!!!!

  44. I for one... by glittalogik · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome the new 'diaper' tag, and look forward to seeing it used more often on /.

    1. Re:I for one... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      ...welcome the new 'diaper' tag, and look forward to seeing it used more often on /.

      Sure you want that? With an aging population this really could be TMI.

    2. Re:I for one... by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      Well, now you've got me thinking...

      1. This...
      2. this...
      3. and this...
      4. ...
      5. TMI, or profit?

  45. Almost right by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    For example, the US Coast Guard will fire you if you get yourself a DUI as a civilian, and if you are active duty you COULD get two DUI's (pending a board review) before being fired, but that's it.

    Unless there's other factors (or you're found as 'alcohol dependent' in your first 6 months of active service'), nobody gets discharged for one alcohol incident. Discharge is only automatic after two 'alcohol incidents'* for officers. Enlisted personnel can go as high as three if they're otherwise clean.

    On the flip side, you could be a lazy bum and be a low productivity worker for decades, and probably make it to retirement while being paid moderately well.

    Well, that's true in any branch of the military. As long as you (generally) follow orders as they are given, getting involuntarily discharged takes some serious work. (Although some branches have a 'up or out' up to a certain rank - if you don't make a particular rank by your fourth or eighth year, you won't be given the option of renewing your enlistment or commission.

    *Although it's not just a DWI that counts as an alcohol incident. Any arrest involving alcohol, from a public drunkeness to a misdemeanor assault while intoxicated is an alcohol incident. As is showing up for duty drunk, drinking on duty... basically any misconduct where 'alcohol was consumed and was a significant causative factor in the misconduct.'

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  46. A different perspective by iamthird · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's remember that Lisa Nowak is a human being, even though she acted abnormally. I am not defending her wrong actions, but I would just like to say: people, don't be too harsh on her. She has family, friends, and a future (however it may be) just like the rest of us.

    Imagine one of your friends or family member did something like she did. You can't really imagine it, right? That's what her friends and family now face, because she has done something so incredibly unbelievable.

    It's a great sadness and tragedy to her family and friends, NASA, the world space program, and most of all, Lisa Nowak herself.

    Let's hope she and NASA will learn from this lesson and wish that she will still have some hope for her future.

    1. Re:A different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's remember that Lisa Nowak is a human being

      So's my adulterous whore bitch ex-wife. What's the difference between my ex-wife and an adulterous whore bitch astronaut? What's your point?

    2. Re:A different perspective by BendingSpoons · · Score: 1

      Well, that's certainly a different perspective.

      A woman was pepper-sprayed in her car by a crazed astronaut. The astronaut had a knife and a mallet in her car and certainly meant to inflict quite grievous harm upon her victim. The assault was a pre-meditated and meticulously planned event.

      And our reaction to this story should be: "Poor astronaut. I hope she has a nice future"?

      There's an old saying to the effect of "Let's not forget the victims in our haste to pity their assailants." (That's a very rough paraphrase.) I don't understand what element of this story prompts your sympathy for Nowak, who went to great lengths and great trouble to kidnap and presumably kill a woman for dating Nowak's ex-lover. But I would venture to say that your sympathy is misplaced, and could probably find a more suitable recipient.

      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
  47. Has no one any shame anymore? by lohphat · · Score: 0

    Why is it that if someone had a severe spinal injury which caused them to limp or drag their leg behind them evokes sympathy and potentially assistance on the street but if the brain is involved, where behavior suddenly changes involuntarily, they can be mocked and ridiculed in public?

    Have some respect and sympathy for a person going through a very difficult time.

    1. Re:Has no one any shame anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, whatever dude, much greater tragedies happen world wide every second, and we're supposed to feel ashamed of ridiculing stupid celebrities? Naw, I think if I'm gonna try to feel sensitivity, it'll be towards like all them kids croaking without food or meds on like half the planet.

  48. That's not insensitive, these jokes from 1986 are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q - Why are the dolphins off Florida so smart?
    A - They have a new teacher.

    Q - What does NASA stand for?
    A - Need Another Seven Astronauts.

    I went to the hobby shop and got a Challenger model. No assembly required - just toss the pieces in your full bathtub.

    Q - What's worse than finding pieces of broken glass in baby food?
    A - Finding pieces of astronaut in your tuna.

    Get off your moral high horse. Gallows humor is an all-too-human response to terrible situations.

  49. You're forgetting... astronauts = military by Chmcginn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd figure with cases like this, they'd just keep her suspended without pay pending the outcome of the trial.

    This can't be done, legally, because Capt. Nowak is a military officer. (As it says in the article, the reason NASA requested her transfer back the regular Navy is because they do not have the authority to use administrative measures against military members assigned to them.

    Firing her sounds like NASA is taking a stand in what is probably an ongoing investigation . . .

    This is actually pretty common in all things military. It doesn't take conviction of anything to remove an officer or enlisted person from a special position, like a commanding officer, executive officer, command representative, or even just a normal pilot. Even just being charged with something questionable usually results in the person being relieved of that position/command until the whole issue is sorted out. If they're found innocent, they might get another chance at it sometime later...

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  50. That's ok. I heard she got a job in advertisting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling nappies...

    Haw haw...

  51. She's kooky and she's spooky.... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    Lisa Nowack

    Click-click

    Click-click

    She's kooky and she's spooky, she's a NASA Astro-NOT!

    Thank you, [bowing] Thank you

  52. Closest Bathroom by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Technically, the closest bathroom would be on the shuttle, no more than 100 metres away.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  53. It's not that simple, or that complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orf. majorly dissed them and is a totally selfish prick that doesn't love anyone but himself. Why doesn't he get any ink. Oh wait, the media is run by a whole bunch of selfish pricks who think what he did is OK.

  54. GS versus E by LinDVD · · Score: 1

    Well, I don't know all the details on the active duty side of the house so well. I know for a fact that though that civilians can be fired over one DUI incident, because a contractor I know, just recently took a "drug and awareness" class, and he was telling me that how it's tough to get fired, it's not impossible. Contractors of course, can be let go at the end of the contract, if it is not renewed/refunded. They are getting tougher though for active duty folk concerning things like domestic violence, but not enough to fire you over it. I'll have to ask about officers versus enlisted staff though 'cause I hadn't thought about that difference...

    --
    Just because you get modded "insightful" on Slashdot doesn't mean you actually are in real life.
  55. Lisa NOWAK by dracovolans · · Score: 1

    Well, wtf is NOWACK? Noone catch that? Its probably the most easy to pronouce for english speaking people polish surename, and still someone made this "nowack". lol.

  56. Re:That's not insensitive, these jokes from 1986 a by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've actually handled wreckage of the Challenger.

    Have you?

    I thought not.

    Trust me, it changes your perspective.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  57. Define strange behaviour by warm+sushi · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'd imagine that it takes very little in the way of strange behavior to disqualify a person for astronaut duty"

    Like wanting to be blasted into space in an outdated craft stuck on top of a giant fuel tank?

  58. Stages? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Was it a three stage firing?

  59. Oefelein is the man by heroine · · Score: 1

    The middle aged, lifetime single, Silicon Valley engineers would like to know how Oefelein, in a world of 99% men, managed to get 2 heroines to fall over for him. Not counting the hundreds of others who swooned over him, that guy must be some kind of sexual genius.

    The fact that he's the real life incarnation of Maverick doesn't cover it. Having a full head of mane doesn't cover it. It takes serious cash to impress nowadays but swabbies don't make nearly enough. Was it rocket exhaust #5?

  60. Why fire Novak? by madbawa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its the guy (the capitain) who couldn't keep his dcik in his pants. He's the one who ought to be fired for playing with women's emotions. Actually, that'll leave very few male astronauts in NASA.

    1. Re:Why fire Novak? by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Yep, the guy that "played with womens emotions" should get fired before the girl that drove across the country in a car loaded with gear for some sort of kidnapping/murder attempt and assaults another woman should definately get a second chance because someone "played with her emotions".

    2. Re:Why fire Novak? by madbawa · · Score: 1

      Yes. Thats what I am saying. Attack the root cause of crime and not the criminal. Whats happening today even in tackling problems like corruption and poverty is that criminals and perpetrators are being targeted and punished. The root cause of the problem remains intact in all these conditions and some other unsuspecting person falls prey to it. Tackle the cause and the effects will be taken care of.

    3. Re:Why fire Novak? by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      How far back do you want to go to find the root cause?

      Perhaps the guy shouldn't be the one getting punished, perhaps it's his parents fault for not teaching him to respect the sanctity of marriage. Or maybe his school teachers fault for not teaching him to respect other peoples feelings. Or maybe NASAs fault for not stopping all employees from fraternising socially so this wouldn't come up in the first place?

      Somewhere down the line the criminal has to take responsibility for their actions. Is it really likely that the guy is going to move on to another relationship and someone else is going to completely flip out and assault/kidnap/murder someone? and that will be his fault as well?

      I agree with the idea that the root cause of crimes needs to be dealt with, but I think its a stretch to say her actions can be blamed on his in this situation. Nowaks actions were off the charts crazy as a response to what had happened between the three parties involved.

    4. Re:Why fire Novak? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Its the guy (the capitain) who couldn't keep his dcik in his pants. He's the one who ought to be fired for playing with women's emotions.

      OK, I know you're trolling. But taking that seriously anyway, would any reasonable person not expect an astronaut to like the ladies?

      Thrillseekers are notoriously promiscuous, and notoriously good at it. The reasons are probably too long to get into here, but you can boil it down to "women like dangerous men" and "dangerous men like women" (yeah, generalization - shoot me). This isn't really debatable, it just is. Now, astronauts are basically the embodied ideal of thrillseeking behavior. Sure, they're incredibly smart and selected to be calm under immense stress, but those are the main things separating them from cliff divers, parachutists, and dragracers.

      What you're asking for is brilliant, brave, healthy, clean, and chaste. Has that combination happened more than a couple of times in history?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Why fire Novak? by madbawa · · Score: 1

      Point taken :)

  61. Some crazy lady showing up at my door? by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
    "I point-blank asked him. When he told me that he had this relationship and that he broke it off with her, I asked him, 'Are you sure that she's OK with this?' Because you know how these things go," Shipman said, according to the court documents.

    "And I said, 'Is there going to be some crazy lady showing up at my door trying to kill me?' and he said, 'No, no, no, she's not like that, she's fine with it, she's happy for me.' "

    Wow, that lady can see into the future :)

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  62. Message received, loud and clear. by surfcow · · Score: 1

    If you ever find yourself having irrational thoughts, emotional problems or any kind of mental health issue, DON'T TELL ANYONE. Keep it a secret. Do not seek help. Your career depends on it.

    Thank you NASA for showing us how it's done.

    And good luck finding humans without human frailties. I hear they hang out with the unicorns.

  63. They're sending here here... dammit. by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

    This is just the sort of BS Corpus Christi needs...I wonder if she'll be wearing diapers to catch it as she drives across Ward Island (where my office is) to get to the base.

  64. Re:That's not insensitive, these jokes from 1986 a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, I heard the "Need Another Seven Astronauts" joke about two days after the event in question.

  65. Non-stop? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that is so you can drive non stop. Duh.

    Please tell us the car that she drove that actually got 900 miles to a tank of gasoline. We want to know about it!

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Non-stop? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      As odd as it may sound, my suburban can get 750+ miles on a single tank. If I had a second tank on it, I would be able to easily reach 900 miles. There are a number of trucks that have reserve tanks as an option.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    2. Re:Non-stop? by Dretep · · Score: 0

      Not sure what she drove but apparently the Honda Insight can do 1500 miles.

  66. NASA fires astronaut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like that? I thought they first put them in a rocket?

  67. TFA is lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's a better FA, that goes into the real reason for the firing:

    "She's on active duty with the Navy," said Cmdr. Lydia Robertson. As for Nowak's ongoing criminal proceedings, Robertson called it a "civilian matter" and would not speculate on any military actions "that would come under her new commander."

    Nowak, who was arrested last month in Orlando on charges she attempted to kidnap a romantic rival, remains an active duty naval officer. She has been "on detail" to NASA as an astronaut since her selection in 1996.

    NASA requested an end to the relationship because "the agency lacks the administrative means to deal appropriately with the criminal charges pending," a NASA press release said. Nowak is not subject to administrative action by NASA because she is a naval officer on assignment and not a space agency civil servant.

    Emphasis mine
    -mcgrew
  68. Men And Women In Close Service Is Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sort of event is the reason I don't like mixed sex programs in things like the military and NASA. Weird stuff happens and focus gets lost. I had a reserve base near where I grew up and all sorts of intrigues had taken place there between the men and women. It never used to be like that. Five years ago I worked in a pub and watched the men and women getting drunk with each other. "These people will be trouble if they ever have to go to a war" I used to think to myself. When Iraq and the Abu Ghraib incidents happened I wasn't surprised to see it was male and female reservists doing such things while "entertaining" each other. Of course there were also things like Tailhook and the Air Force Academy escapades. Of course problems like this were predicted when women were used to break-up the male corps for political purposes so I don't blame the people involved as much as the eggheads who set the stage for such things to happen. Now the eggheads want to force the homo stuff on the military. Of course that won't last long since some collapse always follows that sort of degeneration.

  69. Over/Under Pool by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    I have:

    * 18 months when we'll see a trial;

    * 6 months between the start and the end of the trial;

    * 10 years in prison, with five years probation;

    * 5 years afterwards a private firm will hire her to fly their test spacecraft, or;

    * 5 years afterwards she'll star on a reality TV series, or;

    * 8 years afterwards she'll star on a reality TV series about trying to fly a test spacecraft.

    Unreal? Amy Fisher, anyone?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  70. no career for any of them, pard by swschrad · · Score: 1

    there is a LOT of competition for superior positions out there in the military. anything can blow your career up. if things are tight enough, sneezing in formation could do it.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:no career for any of them, pard by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      if things are tight enough, getting documented for sneezing in formation could do it.

      Fixed that for ya.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  71. Do you know what you are? I'll tell you.... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    ...you sir are an ENABLER of the highest order.

    I commend you sir, you ENABLE people like no one has ever done before. My hat is off to you sir!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  72. at least NASA didnt jump the gun by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Some organizations would fire you immediately if you were arrested even if you are never convicted. NASA at least waited a few weeks for the details of the indictment to come out.

  73. Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe she was gonna reveal the aliens and had to be stopped. Nothing makes you look crazier than using adult diapers.

  74. On peeing in media res by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Bike racers of both sexes do it without stopping, and often without even pulling down their shorts. So do runners. I was helping with the Leadville 100, an ultramarathon 100 miles long, and can't tell you how often I saw people running and suddenly they were leaving wet footprints. At least bike racers (usually) have the civility to pull out of the paceline and let fly so you don't get a faceful of urine. And for that matter, it's better drafting someone who is taking a leak than someone who hit the pavement in an earlier crash, coz having bloody flecks from the guy ahead of you start appearing on your jersey makes you think about what you must be breathing...

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  75. Exactly what i was thinking.. by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Ready?

    3... 2... 1... Ignition!

    Yay! NASA Fires Astronaut!

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  76. Re:That's not insensitive, these jokes from 1986 a by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      The dissolution we know as death happens to all living things. We all have to face it.

      The real tragedy of Challenger was not about humans dying. It was about dreams dying.

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.