Slashdot Mirror


Vanishing Honeybees Will Affect Future Crops

daninbusiness writes "Across the US, beekeepers are finding that their bees are disappearing — not returning while searching for nectar and pollen. This could have a major impact on the food industry in the United States, where as much as $14 billion worth of agriculture business depends on bees for crop pollination. Reasons for this problem, dubbed 'colony collapse disorder,' are still unknown. Theories include viruses, some type of fungus, poor bee nutrition, and pesticides."

322 comments

  1. It's Global Warming! by spun · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where's my check?

    Haha, just kidding. I believe in anthropogenic global warming, but I can't resist an easy shot like that.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:It's Global Warming! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Here in France, Genetically Engineered Organisms are blamed for that.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:It's Global Warming! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know you're joking, but a slightly warmer climate definitely can impact susceptibility to fungal infections, etc.

      I kept bees for quite a few years (in NJ) but stopped because of a mite that destroyed my colonies. My last extraction (in 2001) produced less than six pounds from each super, I had been getting 22-25 pounds in the early 90s. The Beekeepers Quarterly had an article at the time suggesting that the red mite was limited in it's northern expansion due to temperature, but that a succession of a few warm winters allowed it to reach nearly all the continental US -- only a harsh winter will kick it back down south.

      None of this, by the way, provides any insight into why a slashdotter would keep bees, which is a mystery better left unexplored.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:It's Global Warming! by trongey · · Score: 1

      ...I believe in anthropogenic global warming...

      So, what, it's a religion now?
      Are you a born-again believer, or did you grow up in a anthropogenic global warming household?
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:It's Global Warming! by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of this, by the way, provides any insight into why a slashdotter would keep bees, which is a mystery better left unexplored.

      Because honey in the comb is a wonderful thing? There were beehives on my family's farm when I was a kid.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:It's Global Warming! by dave562 · · Score: 3, Informative
      The Beekeepers Quarterly had an article at the time suggesting that the red mite was limited in it's northern expansion due to temperature, but that a succession of a few warm winters allowed it to reach nearly all the continental US -- only a harsh winter will kick it back down south.

      I read an article about a similar scenario that is happening in Colorado. Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods. In the past it wasn't as big of a deal because the frost would come through every winter and kill the bastards off. These days it doesn't get cold enough to kill them so they are just laying waste to huge swaths of the forest. =(

    6. Re:It's Global Warming! by encoderer · · Score: 0

      I swear--check my comment history, subscribers--this is the first time I've ever done this. But, wth...

      In soviet russia, the globe warms you.

      Ahhhhhhhhh...... I've been holding that in for a while.

    7. Re:It's Global Warming! by GJSchaller · · Score: 1

      Honey for Mead hombrewing? That's why I'd do it.

      That, or a new packet transport method...

    8. Re:It's Global Warming! by spun · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a Newtonian gravity household. Einstein is the devil. Space-time is myth! Anyone can plainly see that space and time are two different things.

      Anthropogenic global warming, on the other hand, is like Buddhism. You can tack it onto anything. On Falling Apple Day, we used to bake an apple pie using a solar oven as a tribute to Saint Gore.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:It's Global Warming! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see if the two harsh winters we've had on the east coast since 2001 have changed anything.

    10. Re:It's Global Warming! by alta · · Score: 0

      Damn you beat me to it! I can't belive it's not there, coming from such a liberal biased rag as the NYT!

      Freaking liberals. Lets send them to the moon, no warming there yet.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    11. Re:It's Global Warming! by spun · · Score: 1

      The NYT is liberal like CNN is conservative, i.e. not very. There is no liberal bias. There is corporate bias, and there is laziness, and that is all you need to know to explain the media.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm...Hate to say it, but a harsh winter on the east coast feels pretty damn mild in the midwest. Tons and tons of snowfall aren't harsh - a week of 40 below zero nights are getting there.

    13. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods.

      Is anyone else picturing Ringo chewing on a redwood log?

    14. Re:It's Global Warming! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      He said he was in New Jersey. I assumed that when the word "harsh" was used, we were going by local standards.

      Yes, there are places on the planet where a harsh winter means 40 below. That's lovely for those places. Perhaps they deserve a medal.

    15. Re:It's Global Warming! by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1, Funny

      France blames global warming on GEOs? Wow! Personally, I blame Chevrolet for the GEO.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    16. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods.

      Is anyone else picturing Ringo chewing on a redwood log? Who isn't?! Yeah, that's right, I said what we're all thinking...
    17. Re:It's Global Warming! by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Hopefully thats been taken care of, thanks to the bitter ass cold we've had here lately...

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    18. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its all that Norwegian Wood.

    19. Re:It's Global Warming! by gurudyne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read an article about a similar scenario that is happening in Colorado. Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods.

      Redwoods? In Colorado? Redwoods in California/Oregon I would believe. Reddish somethings in Colorado I would believe, but not redwoods.

      --
      Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
    20. Re:It's Global Warming! by mark3748 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Yes, it is a religion

      I've said it before, and cited references, that global warming hasn't been proven. Instead of warning labels on textbooks concerning evolution, they should put them on textbooks about global warming:

      "Warning: Global Warming is not a fact, it is just a theory"

    21. Re:It's Global Warming! by Random+Destruction · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Maybe one day people will stop making these lame jokes, and we can stop wasting our mod points

      I applaud anyone who helps push this crap below my viewing threshold.

      --
      :x
    22. Re:It's Global Warming! by zotz · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, I figure this is the issue that will get Bush his Oscar a few years down the road...

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    23. Re:It's Global Warming! by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These days it doesn't get cold enough to kill them so they are just laying waste to huge swaths of the forest. =(

      I know it is offtopic, but the same thing was happening in East Texas. The pine beetle was devastating the forests there. However, a control method was found that stopped the problem cold. Whenever you found a tree that was infected, you cut the tree down. Unfortunately, the Clinton administration banned cutting down tree on national forests to prevent logging. While his intentions were well meaning, it ended up destroying forests. Like in the west where forest fires had no breaks to stop them, the pine beetle wiped out many national forests in East Texas. It was almost humorous to be driving along and see an empty field surrounded by wooded areas. I asked my uncle what happened and he told that the clear area was a national land while the area around it was privately owned. The private owners would spot the infected trees and cut them down, but since that was illegal in the national forest, the whole plot was wiped out.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    24. Re:It's Global Warming! by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      It's a similar problem here in British Columbia with pine beetles destroying all the forest. Normally they're numbers were controlled by cold winters.

    25. Re:It's Global Warming! by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1
      Buy comb from my neighbor.


      Also, he just bottled a Mint varietal. It is nice.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    26. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, boo fucking hoo.

    27. Re:It's Global Warming! by trongey · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a Newtonian gravity household. Einstein is the devil. Space-time is myth! Anyone can plainly see that space and time are two different things...

      Newtonianism is sooo 17th century.
      Wait a minute - you can see space and time?
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    28. Re:It's Global Warming! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I usually buy it from the local farmer's market now.

      When my family had bee hives, it was mostly clover and apple honey. Biscuits and honey was a great way to start the day on the weekends when I was there (my parents and I lived in town. My uncle and grandmother lived on and ran the farm). =]

      It was also nice to have some 350 odd acres to play on as a kid.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    29. Re:It's Global Warming! by spun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait a minute - you can see space and time?

      Sure, and with a little ayahuasca, so can you. Just watch out for the self-transforming machine elves.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    30. Re:It's Global Warming! by Plunky · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was also nice to have some 350 odd acres to play on as a kid.
      what was odd about them, did it affect your development?
    31. Re:It's Global Warming! by rthille · · Score: 1

      For the honey?
      So they can brew mead!
      Ok, I just bought my honey...I guess I'm just not that hard-core.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    32. Re:It's Global Warming! by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      I applaud anyone who helps push this crap below my viewing threshold.

      Check your user preferences... you can change your modifier for "funny" to automatically mod it down, rather than up.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    33. Re:It's Global Warming! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've bookmarked your link.

      I'm a big fan of the hugely bold honeys, like buckwheat -- sick of the watered-down tasting almond honey in the supermarkets.

      Blueberry is also a big one in NJ, nice flavor.

      I've a few friends in Connecticut who brew nice strong ales, they like using my buckwheat honey just before bottling for a little extra bottle fermentation. As soon as they figure out that it's more than twice as potent as sugar, they'll get the carbonation under control and win some of those contests they've been entering.

      Thinking of a buckwheat honey porter for next Christmas...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    34. Re:It's Global Warming! by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Judging from his signature, it must have had at least *some* odd effect on him.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    35. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you actually see mites? I ask because I kept bees in connecticut in the late 80's and found that the colonies' strength would greatly decrease toward late summer. I never found a single mite. I tend to think the problem was/is pesticide related.

    36. Re:It's Global Warming! by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      First off, there aren't any redwoods in Colorado. Second, the beetle problem has more to do with drought combined with poor forest management (logging restrictions and fire supression). Global warming has nothing to do with it, other than the possibility that changing climate has produced more droughts over the last few years in the West, which is unlikely.

    37. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pine beetle infestation has grown to crazy amounts in British Columbia, Canada as well. It apparently would take 2 good winters with a severe cold front for 2-3 weeks to kill the beetles. (-30 celsius for 2+ weeks) Unfortunately, the last 10+ years have had very warm winters and the pine beetles have killed millions and millions of trees. You see a rusty brown expanse along a lot of the interior highways.

      A forest fire would also help, but those are fought vigorously.

    38. Re:It's Global Warming! by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Seems like the people in charge had good reason to get an exception. I would also think that Park Rangers and Forestry workers would be immune from such rules

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    39. Re:It's Global Warming! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      My dad used to keep bees when I was a kid. We had citrus -- mostly orange trees, but some lemons, limes, and tangerines, and there's seasonally wild buckwheat, mustard, and lupine in the area.

      The honey from our hives was thick, and very dark in color.

      As a kid, I wasn't much into it. Today, I miss honey that's really rich and has that weird protein-y propalis smell.

      There's one guy in the local farmer's market that has something close, but even his darkest is more amber than dark.

      And as for a porter ... why not a really kick-ass dark mead?

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    40. Re:It's Global Warming! by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      Florida now as African Killer Bees! So our crops will be pollinated really great but the poor farmers might not make it back from the barn!

    41. Re:It's Global Warming! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Here in Alaska, we have bark beetle problems. It was caused by logging. There were large piles of wood that were not used, for whatever reason. This allowed huge colonies of the beetles to form. A healthy tree can survive a small infestation. However, the large colonies spread through the forest, killing all the spruce trees. Logging killed millions of spruce trees here, devastating entire forests and greatly increasing the chances of massive forest fires. It was these types of abuses that spurred people to try to protect forests. However, having already damaged the ecosystem, they stopping our interfering can be as bad as continued devastation. It takes actual forethought to care for our natural resources, and that's not something politicians are bred for.

    42. Re:It's Global Warming! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      And as for a porter ... why not a really kick-ass dark mead?

      I'm not a huge fan of mead, I prefer the classic ales. I find a better depth of flavor in ale.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    43. Re:It's Global Warming! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Yep. Started seeing the mites around '95 or so, by 2001 I could barely keep the hives going, let alone get a worthwhile yield.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    44. Re:It's Global Warming! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods.

      Must be Ringo. John and George are dead and Sir Paul's too tied up in his personal troubles (if you know what I mean). Might be Yoko trying to butt in, but I doubt it, as it's fairly simple to identify a Japanese Beatle.

      --
      That is all.
    45. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, man: this is a triumph for gay rights!
      Here be queer bee!
      Woo hoo!
      Go, nihilism!

    46. Re:It's Global Warming! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened in SoCal. Drought led to weakened trees, bark beetle infections, mass die-offs (about 80%) and finally, massive fires.

      Selective logging would have prevented the problem, not only by removing diseased trees, but also by keeping the healthy trees thinned down to a level that the drought-reduced water levels could support. (If trees don't get enough water, their sap production is reduced, and it's sap that helps with mechanical prevention of bark and twig borers.)

      Much as it pains me to see a living tree cut down, it's better to keep one healthy tree that has the resources to fight off disease, than to have five weakened trees that are all doomed.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:It's Global Warming! by IntelEmployee · · Score: 1

      Yea, because Colorado doesn't get frost in the winter.........http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933 ,237977,00.html

      --
      arette? yes please!
    48. Re:It's Global Warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some species of beatle..."

      Ringo ?

    49. Re:It's Global Warming! by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      odd: S: (adj) odd (an indefinite quantity more than that specified) "invited 30-odd guests"

      I don't know if it's a regional thing nor where the original poster is from, but we use the word "odd" this way very frequently where I'm from.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    50. Re:It's Global Warming! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I'm in Ohio. It's fairly common here.

      And you? :P

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    51. Re:It's Global Warming! by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you've said it before, but your cite from the right wing think tank (predictably receiving funding from Exxon) is from 10 years ago and filled with half-truths and outright lies (look up the latest IPCC report and see how it conflicts with what's written there). The Crichton crap has been addressed a million times already. What makes you think quoting these idiots is more convincing than what actual climatologists have to say on the matter?

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    52. Re:It's Global Warming! by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      Some species of beatle is eating the redwoods.

      It shouldn't be hard to figure out which species...there are only four.

    53. Re:It's Global Warming! by mark3748 · · Score: 1
      The American Policy Center seems to support what I know for a fact, and backs it up with scientific data.

      Then there is this article, or this one...

      Now this has nothing to do with left wing/right wing anything, it's about hard science. Something that you believe in that is not supported by facts is essentially a religion.

  2. Damn birds by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously it is the resurgence in bird populations that is killing the bees.

    We have to bring back DDT.

    This is simply a matter of the birds and the bees.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Damn birds by JamDonut · · Score: 1

      Bees get on my chimes anyway. The fuckers always want to sting me. =(

    2. Re:Damn birds by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      man bear pig is killing them. get al gore!

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:Damn birds by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bees get on my chimes anyway. The fuckers always want to sting me.

      Have you considered wearing pants?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  3. Colony Collapse by hooded_fang · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Ive saw a story on this on the news a few weeks ago here in British Columbia. The fungus seems particularily effective in warmer climates. Still, saying that they're worried about it wiping out Canadian colonies as well.

    Hmm, maybe its time our world leaders started thinking more effectively on how to curb our fatal overconsumption lifestyle. And maybe the rest of us should put up mason bee homes to do our part to help

    1. Re:Colony Collapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need world leaders to do your thinking for you?

    2. Re:Colony Collapse by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      He can think on his own too, but it's the world leaders' thoughts that form the world leaders' decisions.

      --
      (IANAL)
    3. Re:Colony Collapse by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe its time our world leaders started thinking more effectively on how to curb our fatal overconsumption lifestyle. And maybe the rest of us should put up mason bee homes to do our part to help See, this is why you so-called enviornmentalists make so many enemies... "curb our fatal overconsumption lifestyle"? What? You are attaching a whole bunch of moralistic and philisophical bullshit to the problem to promote your own social and political agenda.

      There is absolutly nothing wrong with consumption. Consuming things makes people happy. Consumerism is good. What we need to do is stop CO2 emmisions - we can still consume all we like assuming that we use solar, nuclear, wind, or geothermal energy and properly recycle our waste materials.

      If you guys would stop exploiting Global Warming to promote your agenda which has nothing to do with enviornmentalism, you would discover that virtually everyone is for protecting the enviornment (it is the one issue that pretty much effects everyone). Instead you alienate anyone who doesn't agree that forsaking capitalism and living on centrally planned communes is a desirable state of affairs.
    4. Re:Colony Collapse by hooded_fang · · Score: 1

      Wow did you ever read a lot into things. I never said that I was anti-consumer. But you know we are trying to maintain a lifestyle that is unmanageable. Why can't we opt for technology and products that are more useful and better technology that what gets the manufacturer a bigger profit for less. Why do SUV sales keep dropping and yet our North American auto manufacturers keep making them. Simply put we have forgotten to compete in a consumer driven world. Instead of better we confuse it with bigger meaning more instead of quality. Id love to know that I can buy something and have it last for a while. Id rather not keep buying the same thing over and over again. As for global warming it exists. Look at the arctic where the effects are happening four times faster than everywhere else. Both the US and Canada have admitted that Polar Bears are in big trouble. Then again you seem more interested in amassing more stuff and getting fatter. What's it going to take to change your mind? Not being able to breathe? or not ever having clean drinking water again? How about you get off your moral soapbox for a change and look into changing the way we consume. Why do we allow outsourcing of manufacturing to countries with lax environmental laws? Why is my government (Canada) more interested in consulting with Oil Company execs when it comes to the environment over scientists. Why arent both sides being heard? Oh that's right you want a big SUV and a 72 plasma TV and you dont care what happens. There's more than Global Warming at stake. Look at the stupid things that we're doing to the planet. Cloned meat and milk? Why the hell are the Swiss creating a Hadron Collider? Why are salmon genes being introduced to strawberries and tomatoes? That is not smart consumerism. Why are there growth hormones in our food. There is a difference in being smart and being stupid and consumerism because "people like it" without any common sense is a dead end street. So get your paintbrush out RexRhino and try to paint me again as a tree-hugger or enviro etc. It makes no difference in the long run when climate-change deniers like you are choking on the mess of an atmosphere that we've created. And just to give you a new buzzword try out Global Dimming. There's another thing to put in your pipe and smoke.

  4. please... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh please. Like bees have anything to do with crop production...What are these so-called "scientists" going to try to convince us of next?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:please... by jimstapleton · · Score: 1, Interesting

      please tell me that's a joke.

      As the article stated, bees are very important for polination on many species of plants. In english: The bees help the plants have sex.

      Severly reduce the bees, and you have less seeds. Less seeds means less plants. Oh, and most fruits are just elaborate seed casings, so fewer bees -> fewer seeds -> lower fruit output of such plants -> lower crop.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:please... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      I hope that was satire. Many crops are NOT self-pollinating and it takes bees to spread the pollen. You will get some pollination from wind but bees are the best. Yields have increased 2-3X when orchards bring in bees versus just letting whatever ones are around do the job. Beekeepers actually lease hives to fruit/vegatable producers and make significant money for such (plus they get to keep the honey). The decline of bees is a BAD thing, it could really affect crops and thus the prices we pay for food.

    3. Re:please... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your parents never taught you about the 'birds and the bees'.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    4. Re:please... by CaseyG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hope you have learned from this that there can be no sarcasm so obvious that it will not be taken seriously.

        -c.

      --
      Casey

      More scratches on the cave wall, thanks be to anonymity.

    5. Re:please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if these "scientists" are right, it's only 60% of the crops. We can simply plant more of the other 40% and we'll be fine. Mankind can solve any problem, so why worry about things going wrong. That's the problem with Liberals, they are always trying to plan for the future. *wink*

    6. Re:please... by ShadoHawk · · Score: 0

      So if I start making plant pr0n I need to hire some bee fluffers?

    7. Re:please... by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      definetly!

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    8. Re:please... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Less seeds means less plants. No, less seeds means you don't know the difference between less and fewer.

    9. Re:please... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Are you going to count all the seeds and plants? No? Thyen let's allow the use of less this time, shall we?

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    10. Re:please... by AeroIllini · · Score: 1


      <-- WHOOOSH --
      . O
      .-+-
      . |
      ./ \



      "Sarcasm"
      Text on Internet Post
      AeroIllini, 2007

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    11. Re:please... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      There's no proviso that someone has to be willing to count the seeds, just that it is possible.

      I suppose one could say it's theoretically possible to count the molecules in a substance, but...

    12. Re:please... by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Well, I couldn't be sure. That's part of the reason I had the opening line.

      Unfortunately sarcasm/inflection doesn't transfer well over plain text, and since he didn't bother with any formatting, I had to consider both possibilities.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    13. Re:please... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      I took this from the afforementioned article you provided:

      Although sand may be technically countable, no one ever does; hence, the less sand we find in our beach bag, the better.

      I believe the same applies.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    14. Re:please... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Less sand.

      Fewer grains of sand.

      In fact, in this case, less seed, fewer seeds.

    15. Re:please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me modify yours a bit:

      I hope you have learned from this that there can be no sarcasm so obvious that it will not be taken seriously.</sarcasm>
      See, it works the other way too. :)
    16. Re:please... by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      This is not a joke,i heard about it month ago.
      There plenty speculations and conspiracy theories about it on the net if you search deep enough,

    17. Re:please... by Jon+Luckey · · Score: 1
      In english: The bees help the plants have sex.

      "It's not such a bad life", thought the tree. "Sun. Fresh air. Time to
      think. Bees, too, in the spring."

      There was something lascivious about the way the tree said "bees" that
      quite put Granny, who had several hives, off the idea of honey. It was like
      being reminded that eggs were unborn chickens.

      -- Terry Pratchett, Equal Rites
      --
      -- 3 events that reshaped the world in the 20th century: WW1, WW2, and WWW
    18. Re:please... by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your parents never taught you anything about sarcasm.

    19. Re:please... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "No, less seeds means you don't know the difference between less and fewer."

      Fewer grammar nazi posts makes reading slashdot less annoying.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    20. Re:please... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      You've got the hang of it!

  5. Reason for disappearance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Al Gore eat them.

    1. Re:Reason for disappearance by IflyRC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That...or more likely eaten by the engines of his jet as he flies across the world to spread the information in his slides.

      Sucked in....and Al Gore, two things I don't want to really relate together.

  6. like going out to get cigarettes... by User+956 · · Score: 1

    Across the US, beekeepers are finding that their bees are disappearing -- not returning while searching for nectar and pollen.

    Maybe they just don't like their family.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  7. They're heading back.. by bagboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    across the border into Mexico.... They heard the pollen there is sweeter and more abundant.. Plus they can get health care for free..

  8. It sucks. by frakir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Albert Einstein's: "if bees were to disappear, man would only have a few years to live".
    Bees pollinate about 60% of crops in US and Europe. Note that exact same disappearing colonies fenomenon happens in Portugal and Poland.
    We are doomed.

    1. Re:It sucks. by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      Soylent Green anyone?

    2. Re:It sucks. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "fenomenon"

      The first sign of this collapse is the loss of spelling skills.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:It sucks. by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      If they ever figure out what's killing all the bees, someone PLEASE do it to all the goddamn yellowjackets!

    4. Re:It sucks. by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well yeah, everyone knows spelling bees are the phirst to go...
      wait, phirst? Uh, oh...

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    5. Re:It sucks. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      We need to breed more spelling bees then.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:It sucks. by zettabyte · · Score: 1

      Hilarious. I totally thought 'fenomenon' was some word I'd never seen. I was mentally pronouncing it 'FEHnoh-MEHN-on'.

      After a quick re-read, I realized that you meant 'phenomenon'.

      While almost the exact same spelling, that 'f' really threw me for a loop.

    7. Re:It sucks. by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      What are the odds that crops, bioengineered to produce pesticides, are to blame?

    8. Re:It sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are mistaken. This week we are blaming global warming for all the world's problems.

  9. lifestyle by treak007 · · Score: 1

    What does it say about our current lifestyle when even the bees are over stressed?

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
    1. Re:lifestyle by Xonstantine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does it say about our current lifestyle when even the bees are over stressed?

      It says some people don't wait for the investigation or the science to start before they pronounce a verdict. The idea is more or less "Behind every bad thing happening in the world, the US must be responsible for it, and if not the US, then surely humanity." I'm not sure this says anything about our current lifestyle, considering the research and investigation has barely begun. But don't let that stop you from rushing out to make a conclusion.

    2. Re:lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is more or less "Behind every bad thing happening in the world, foo must be responsible for it

      One of the blasted curses of religion.

      God wouldn't "let" bad things happen, therefore all bad things must be someone's fault. Katrina was obviously the fault of the sinners in New Orleans angering God. They must have gotten Him really pissed off, since He was driving quite drunk over the city by way of three states after backing into a lightpole and taking out the mailbox in the hurricanemobile. 9/11 was the fault of gay people, and so on. It also extends down to the little things too. Susie broke her leg leaping off the swing at the playground? The playground owner must have done something, and therefore must pay up.

    3. Re:lifestyle by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      "It says some people don't wait for the investigation or the science to start before they pronounce a verdict. The idea is more or less "Behind every bad thing happening in the world, the US must be responsible for it, and if not the US, then surely humanity." I'm not sure this says anything about our current lifestyle, considering the research and investigation has barely begun. But don't let that stop you from rushing out to make a conclusion."

      That's because we have a very narcissistic view of ourselves. At one point the Earth was the center of the Universe and the Sun rotated around us. For some reason, we (collectively, that is) think that we are still the center of the Universe and either the cause of, or solution to, every problem. We think we are so smart, and the rest of Nature is so dumb. It's almost more philosophical, then psychological. Change is always 'bad' for some reason. The changing cycles of Earth never stop, and unless we get off this dirtball, humans will be replaced at some point as well.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  10. American honeybees... by zstlaw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would they come back? Chinese and Indian honeybees do it cheaper. Rather than wait for their jobs to be outsourced, American honeybees are moving on to greener pastures.

    1. Re:American honeybees... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So are you proposing bringing in a bunch of Chinese and Indian bees under an H1-Bee visa or something?

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:American honeybees... by ameline · · Score: 1

      All your bees are belong to us.

      (sorry :-)

      --
      Ian Ameline
    3. Re:American honeybees... by superstick58 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the legal term is "H1-Beesa."

    4. Re:American honeybees... by georgewad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's not bring Jar-Jar in to this.

      --
      Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
    5. Re:American honeybees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. Here in southern california we have swarms crossing the border, looking for work. Hell, they may even be the ones taking over the industry from the resident bees.

    6. Re:American honeybees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NY Times article mentioned importing bees from Australia, so I guess that's where the Bee pay is low.

    7. Re:American honeybees... by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That pun just killed about 40% of the remaining bee population.

    8. Re:American honeybees... by theEteam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It very well may be Russian bees... from http://urbansurvival.com/nl20070224a.htm: (Saturday Feb 24th) Bee Story
      The collapse of bee colonies has something to do with Russia? Well, here's an email to ponder from a bee-keeping reader: "Hello George, Just a comment on the honey bee problems in the US. I agree that genetically modified plant-life may be causing many problems for the bee population. There is also another possible cause that non-beekeepers probably wouldn't know about. Over the years the honey bee population in the US has been greatly reduced due to attacks of Tracheal mites, Varroa mites, and Hive beetles. Two years ago, in an effort to replenish the bee supply, the government introduced a program to give away "Russian" honeybees. In the US, most beekeepers keep "Italian" honeybees. The "Russian" bees were supposed to be more resistant to the Varroa mites. The original deal was that selected beekeepers would receive (free-of-charge) 2 packages of "Russian" bees and 2 hives. In exchange the beekeepers agreed to not sell the hives for 3 years and to allow regular inspections by government officials. Due to an overwhelming response by beekeepers the deal was later changed to 1 hive of "Russian" and 1 hive of "Italian" bees. I did not take part in the program but I did keep watch on the results in my state. Within the first year (2005) all 250 hives of "Russian" bees that were introduced into this state were dead. I personally know two beekeepers who took part in the program. By the end to 2006, one had lost 43 hives to "Colony Collapse", the other had lost 200 hives (his entire operation) to "Colony Collapse" I don't know if there is a connection or just a horrible coincidence but perhaps the plants aren't the only things being "modified".

  11. Dick Cheney by juan2074 · · Score: 1

    Reasons for this problem, dubbed 'colony collapse disorder,' are still unknown. Theories include viruses, some type of fungus, poor bee nutrition, and pesticides.

    No one wants to talk about the real reason.

  12. So long and thanks for all the pollen. by jusDfaqs · · Score: 1

    quoting "Savage" but funnay as shite :-)

    --
    There are only two steps in the gathering of ultimate knowledge. Open your eyes and, RTFM!
  13. I think it's pretty clear what happened here. by mikkelm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly the introduction of Africanised bees resulted in some sort of bee-AIDS epidemic.

    Those promiscuous pollen pilfering pests!

  14. Children have little fingers by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    We could put them to work in the fields, pollinating plants. Feed them enough sugar and they'd even buzz around like bees.

    You people worry to much. No matter how much we fuck things up, we'll always find a way to fix it that doesn't hurt anyone that matters.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Children have little fingers by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      We could put them to work in the fields, pollinating plants. Feed them enough sugar and they'd even buzz around like bees.

      Or we could just feed our sons and daughters all the royal jelly we have left and get new bees. Ever read Roald Dahl's extremely disturbing short story "Royal Jelly" (collected in Kiss Kiss )? And I for one welcome our new man-bee hybrid overlords.

    2. Re:Children have little fingers by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't matter you insensitive clod!

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    3. Re:Children have little fingers by LoveGoblin · · Score: 2, Funny
      You know the old joke about how you owe me a cup of coffee because your comment made me laugh and my coffee spewed out my nose?

      You owe me a slice of pizza.

  15. It's obvious. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

    This whole "No Drone Left Behind" thing is a failure. The bees are heading out of the country for better educations, free health care and fewer 'reality' programs on the tele.

    1. Re:It's obvious. by green+menace · · Score: 1

      And the reality tv shows that they do have show boobs!!

    2. Re:It's obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole "No Drone Left Behind" thing is a failure. The bees are heading out of the country for better educations, free health care and fewer 'reality' programs on the tele.

      "Tele?" Hah! You sneaky foreigner. That word was a dead give-away.
      Well, that and being informed about US politics pretty much gave you away as being not from around here.

    3. Re:It's obvious. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Well, that and being informed about US politics pretty much gave you away as being not from around here.

      At the very least it means you're not the Secretary of State.

  16. internet addicts by east+coast · · Score: 1

    ever since those bees got their FiOS connections they just don't go out like they use to.

    Or maybe they got a WII or PS3 for Christmas.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:internet addicts by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they got a WII or PS3 for Christmas. who could blame them for taking time off work, those Wiis are the bee's knees
  17. It's a conspiracy! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, really. The bees are being captured by the government and kept in secret facilities where they are pollinating a secret genetically engineered type of plant, which causes them to become carriers of the smallpox virus and be more aggressive. The bees are then used to spread smallpox where needed, without causing an immediate biological warfare panic.

    That's why the bees are disappearing from private bee farms.

  18. That non-registration link didn't work too well. by antdude · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. Traveling hives by John+Jamieson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it difficult believe that roving hives are still allowed. Sure it saves a bit of cash, but the potential effect it has on the spread of disease and parasites(that afflict bee's) should not be overlooked.

    Again, we sell of future potential for short term gain.

    1. Re:Traveling hives by maggard · · Score: 0

      Traveling hives exist for the exact same reason migrant human workers do: They go where the work is.

      With 'modern' farming & orchard practices (meaning the past several hundred years) there is a need for a large number of bees to pollinate the local crop at a specific time, and outside of that short period they are superfluous, indeed would starve. Thus the hives are moved from location to location as crop & climate require. The bees respond quite well to this travel, always enjoying a hearty food supply, much as cattle are moved from pasture to pasture.

      Generally apiarists are quite aware of the health of their hives, which is why these suddenly empty hives are such a shock.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    2. Re:Traveling hives by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

      I am aware why the hives travel. Just because something is efficient, does not make it smart.

      "The bees respond quite well to this travel, always enjoying a hearty food supply."
      Actually NO, if you know your bee's, you would have known that this causes stress, and even with more food, they die off at higher numbers than with stationary hives.

      "Generally apiarists are quite aware of the health of their hives, which is why these suddenly empty hives are such a shock."
      O.K. So how does this prevent quick spread of new disease and parasites?

  20. Days behind by nra1871 · · Score: 1

    I heard this on Coast to Coast AM the other night, with a much more in depth story and interviews.

    1. Re:Days behind by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      Have they been abducted? Do you think we can use remote viewing to find them?

    2. Re:Days behind by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      Or quite possibly they have vibrated (buzzed) into a higher dimension. Or maybe they have discovered the singularity. I for one personally think this is a direct result of the Chupacabra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chupacabra

    3. Re:Days behind by nra1871 · · Score: 1

      I suspect more Reptoid involvement.

    4. Re:Days behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Killer bees!"
      "Killer bees?"
      "Yeah, killer bees! Did you know that if the current migration north continues, we'll all be dead in three years? Do you want to become a bee's supper? Well, I don't! That's why we must act now! Killer bees must be stopped!"
      "I wonder why more people aren't talking about this. I mean, killer bees swarming -- it sounds pretty serious."
      "Ah, but the killer bees are nothing compared to ants -- you can't kill them! They're like sheep, they're going to take over!"
      "All right. Thanks, caller. Ants, killer bees, fat people, what's plaguing you? Call now."

  21. They're playing WoW by IflyRC · · Score: 1

    Yep...WoW addicts. A new expansion just came out...so they're all out there grinding.

  22. I blame Ayn Rand by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    One bee reads "The Fountainhead," blabs about it to her hive sisters, and in a week all of them starve to death while arguing about who's really a pirate, the false doctrine of altruism, and the best way to privatize royal jelly production.

  23. Bee Monoculture by mpapet · · Score: 0, Troll

    Here is a perfect example of the utter and complete failure of the American free-market mantra. A select few people raising bees were made richer with no economic consideration for the risk to the food production chain by adopting a bee mono-culture.

    Now what?

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Bee Monoculture by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, not really. A typical independant bee keeper makes around $30k per year. Honey prices have bottomed out due to cheap foreign imports and the cost of keeping bees has tripled over the last several years. Now that hives are disappearing, I'm sure that prices will rise (supply/demand and all that). But I think your free-market jab is unfounded, at least in this case.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Bee Monoculture by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      the cost of keeping bees has tripled over the last several years

      It's true. I read it on Wikipedia.

    3. Re:Bee Monoculture by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      So let's see... so far we've got the American free market blah blah blah and global warming. Any other Slashdot whipping boys we've left out? I'm sure we could find a way to blame Microsoft and Diebold if we really tried!

    4. Re:Bee Monoculture by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1
      Blockquothing TFA:

      This year the price for a bee colony is about $135, up from $55 in 2004, said Joe Traynor, a bee broker in Bakersfield, Calif.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    5. Re:Bee Monoculture by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Well, no, the grandparent was talking about the way we tend to use a single strain of bees which is almost certainly true. This has repeatedly lead to huge failures in the past, and will continue to do so until we become proactive. Where's the profit in being proactive?

      For long-term survivability of our species, unchecked capitalism is a huge failure. Luckily we don't have unchecked capitalism; but all people are born ignorant of the past and many don't learn so there is always another crop of free-marketeers to push us further in that direction.

    6. Re:Bee Monoculture by Incadenza · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a perfect example of the utter and complete failure of the American free-market mantra. A select few people raising bees were made richer with no economic consideration for the risk to the food production chain by adopting a bee mono-culture. Now what?

      Well, build your own.

      Doesn't work only for software you know. Just google for mason bee housing and build your own genetic diversity tool from that old piece of wood you've got laying around anyway. And save the planet.

  24. Obligatory Simpsons quotation by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Beekeeper 1: Well, sure is quiet in here today.
    Beekeeper 2: Yes, a little too quiet, if you know what I mean.
    Beekeeper 1: Hmm...I'm afraid I don't.
    Beekeeper 2: You see, bees usually make a lot of noise. No noise --
                              suggests no bees!
    Beekeeper 1: Oh, I understand now. Oh look, there goes one now.
    Beekeeper 2: To the Beemobile!
    Beekeeper 1: You mean your Chevy?
    Beekeeper 2: Yes.

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quotation by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Beekeeper 2: To the Beemobile!
      Beekeeper 1: You mean your Chevy?


      No, I mean to the Datsun B-210 Honey-B!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quotation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bart: What a day, eh, Milhouse? The sun is out, birds are singing, bees are trying to have sex with them -- as is my understanding --
      With all of these bees disappearing, won't anybody PLEASE think of the birds?
    3. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quotation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beekeeper 1: You mean your Chevy?
      Beekeeper 2: Yes.
      No, no, no! Dodge! (Super Bee)!
  25. Laws !!! by sskinnider · · Score: 0, Troll

    It is now time to act! The only way we can stop this scourge is to pass a ton of laws to ban everything that could possibly cause this "Colony Collapse Disorder" Congress should act now to pass laws based solely on speculation.

  26. California Almonds by CalibanCaliban · · Score: 1

    "the production of numerous crops, including California almonds, one of the nation's most profitable." Is this a new euphemism for pot?

    1. Re:California Almonds by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      No, California almonds really are one of the nation's most profitable.

  27. Genetically Modified? by SevenHands · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An interesting question to ask. How many crop fields in the affected areas are growing genetically modified crops? Didn't we see results in the past where genetically modified corn caused majorities of Monarch butterflies local to the corn fields to die.

    I know, I know. GM food is safe. heh.

    1. Re:Genetically Modified? by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it wasn't local to a specific field. There were enough GM crops that the entire North American population was affected. There were other factors that caused the huge decline in population (75% decrease in 2004 from the number in the 2003 migration) but the main cause is believed to be genetically modified crops.

      So remember.. If your children have birth defects.. It's not because you didn't eat your vegetables, it's because you did eat them =)

    2. Re:Genetically Modified? by belg4mit · · Score: 1
      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  28. I realize that this post is supposed to be a joke by Ynsats · · Score: 3, Informative

    Like most of the un-funny posts to this article already. However, you managed to hit on something that it seems the article missed. Africanized (Killer) Bees have been a problem reported by bee keeps over much of the southern United States for over a decade now and the problem seems to creep farther north every year.

    The problem stems from the Killer Bees infiltrating a colony of another type of bee and wiping out the colony. Since the killer bees do exhibit the same food gathering and other critical behaviors to pollination, the lost colonys have a bigger impact. I can see the fungus, virus, pesticide and other aspects causing problems in climates farther north but I would not doubt that Killer Bees could be a large contributing factor to this problem.

    It may seem silly but it is a critically important roll that the bees have to crop production. Many grains and vegetables do not require external pollination to produce a crop but there are plenty of other fruit and vegetable crops out there that do. The crops may not go away completely because bees are not the only way they are pollinated but they are one of the most efficient ways.

  29. KIller Bees by AlHunt · · Score: 1

    Not so long ago, it was killer bees moving north from Central America that were going to mix with the more docile honey bees in the US. I wonder if there's any connection ...

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    1. Re:KIller Bees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're secretly recruiting all the non-Africanized bees in the alleyways and behind the trees when they go out.

  30. Inbreeding by zakarria · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is what you get when you breed monocultures of plants or animals. A single disease or problem that wipes out your entire supply. Trying to determine the specific cause is all well and good, but ultimately somewhat beside the point. If we don't want to have this kind of problem we need to purposefully breed for biodiversity so that one pathogen is less likely to destroy an entire industry. I sincerely hope the entire agricultural industry, and others, really comprehend what it is they should be learning from this and change their priorities a bit before the same thing hits say, the entire corn supply.

    1. Re:Inbreeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're suggesting we all go out and shag a bee?

    2. Re:Inbreeding by gobbo · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope the entire agricultural industry, and others, really comprehend what it is they should be learning from this and change their priorities a bit before the same thing hits say, the entire corn supply.

      Don't hold your breath. Agriculture has been so heavily swayed by the siren song of progress that it is liquidating all the natural assets it can in a big techno-cash-grab: squandering soil tilth, water reserves, forests, biodiversity, economic diversity, traditional knowledge, and youth (yes, youth, they're all leaving the farm don'cha know).

      The worst part of this is the worsening mad rush to reductionism and economies of scale, in the face of contrary evidence. Sure, simplifying things to monocrops and one-man combine operations seems cheaper and hugely productive. But it's on biological credit, and if the pests and low fertility don't get you, the bank will when you have to buy more equipment and inputs, and there are market fluctuations and resource shortages and environmental regulations coming down the pipe. You could say that the externalities are coming home to roost, and we're losing the family farm to multinational vertical integration operations like Cargill. Why is that a problem? Well, does your financial advisor suggest you put all your savings into one stock?

      Here's the thing about efficiency in a system: you have to look at all the inputs. The problem with Taylorizing a natural system is that you can't really take all the inputs and products into account properly, so it's easier to ignore or cut them out. A modern operation is unable to put soil biodiversity loss or volunteer cover crop (good weeds) on a spreadsheet, or handle 150 varieties of potatoes to avoid loss to pests or unseasonal weather. The long-term costs are not factored in, though traditionalists and family farmers might try at least.

      If it's Frederick "Speedy" Taylor vs. Mother Nature, guess who's going to win? Scientific management doesn't grok that complex natural systems are more productive over the long term.

    3. Re:Inbreeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific management groks complex systems just fine. It's businessmen who do not care to.

      Nature's yields are not sufficient for our current economic and social systems and frankly arguing for wholesale change at the expense of the existing population is a morally bankrupt position. The prospect of serious population reductions doesn't seem to bother those who don't imagine it will be themselves and their family or friends doing the starving/dying. Rather, the focus should be on determining which aspects can be modified for efficiency (i.e. there is no evidence that crops arranged in a row for harvesting efficiency should be a problem) without losing long term viability. There is only one way I can imagine of to be able to do this and that would be actual scientific management, not business nor nature. Nature is great for some things, we can frequently do better.

    4. Re:Inbreeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it to ConAgra, Texas A&M, and Archer-Daniels Midland.

      They have more corn expertise in their pinky finger than you have in your whole body. And trust me, they already know everything (and more) you mention in your post. Do you really think they are planting just one kind of corn? Jesus...there's an entire academic establishment, industry, and 300 year history with corn and you spout off about inbreeding? C'mon. Surely you can come up with something better than this.

      I cant believe you got modded insightful.

    5. Re:Inbreeding by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      This is what you get when you breed monocultures of plants or animals.


      Errr...weren't we talking about bees here? Queen bees reproduce with essentially their own offspring. They are "inbred" by nature. The only genetic variation you will ever find between a queen bee and her mother is via mutation.
    6. Re:Inbreeding by zakarria · · Score: 1

      Well... actually I have no idea. You may be right. However, whether we came by it through intentional breeding to cultivate certain characteristics, or just bred one or a small number of pre-existing lines that we liked the characteristics of, we've still made ourselves dependent on a very large number of bees with very similar genetics, which lends itself to epidemics. So the subject line may be slightly off, but I think the basic point I was going for still stands.

  31. genetics? by WetCat · · Score: 1

    May be it's because bees are eating Genetically Modified plants?

  32. Humor? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's interesting to look at how many of the above responses are lame/decent attempts at humor.

    Is this because there's nothing in the article for us to all argue about, or because everyone thinks this is funny? What if herds of cattle started vanishing mysteriously out of fields, or cell colonies for research mysteriously all started to plate really poorly?

    Maybe the topic just lends itself to jokes--I had to try pretty hard to not make a cattle abduction joke up there.

    1. Re:Humor? by dave562 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's interesting to look at how many of the above responses are lame/decent attempts at humor. Is this because there's nothing in the article for us to all argue about, or because everyone thinks this is funny?

      When a superior man hears of the Tao,

      he immediately begins to embody it.

      When an average man hears of the Tao,

      he half believes it, half doubts it.

      When a foolish man hears of the Tao,

      he laughs out loud.

      If he didn't laugh,

      it wouldn't be the Tao.

    2. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because every other day there's a new "OMG WE'RE FUCKED" headline, and after a while you just begin to tone them all out.

    3. Re:Humor? by merreborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's interesting to look at how many of the above responses are lame/decent attempts at humor.

      Is this because there's nothing in the article for us to all argue about, or because everyone thinks this is funny?


      This is slashdot.org, not beedot.org. There aren't many people here with knowledge of the beekeeping industry. If this was about CPU fabrication, you'd see a thread full of detailed discussion on operations per cycle and whatever else.

      Instead, it's bees, so all we can do is crack bee jokes. Lack of knowledge => lack of insightful commentary.
    4. Re:Humor? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Everyone agrees it's worrying, and nobody has any more details. What exactly do you expect people to say in comments?

    5. Re:Humor? by ShadoHawk · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this would be a lame attempt and humor or something that would really happen here, but... IT'S THE ALIENS!! THEY ARE STEALING OUR CATTLE!! *puts on his stylish tinfoil hat*

    6. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the bees left a note: "So long, and thanks for all the pollen."

    7. Re:Humor? by moochfish · · Score: 1

      What do cows get when they are sick?

      Hay Fever.

    8. Re:Humor? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Most of what comes to slashdot is flame wars.

      Take some time out to look at general scientific postings on here that don't scream politics or religion and you will find either humor or boredom.

      And if you think this is bad just wait until someone posts about Uranus. It's just a whole barrel of laughs. (*cough*)(*cough*)

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    9. Re:Humor? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You've now quantified a "barrel of laughs" for everyone. Apparently it's about the size of Uranus.

      Hey, you started it.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    10. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What if herds of cattle started vanishing mysteriously out of fields...?"

      Moo moo, moo. Moo. (OH, THAT WAS CARL'S FAULT. HE'S NEW.)

    11. Re:Humor? by complexmath · · Score: 4, Funny

      When a pompous man hears a question, he replies with a non sequitur?

    12. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There just isn't much to argue about. We know that bees are disappearing. Nobody knows why, however, as research into it is still ongoing. So yeah, there's phenomena, but no explanation as of yet. I think we're largely waiting for some results before actually coming to conclusions, as any respectable scientist would.

      So what do people do when they're bored waiting? They tell jokes and otherwise make light of the matter. There's not much else to do.

    13. Re:Humor? by DrBoumBoum · · Score: 1

      "L'humour noir est la politesse du désespoir" (something like "Black humour is the courtesy of despair") My feeling is that those "environmental collapse" bad news are something that you can either deny or giggle at - kind of flight or fight response.

    14. Re:Humor? by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Spoon!

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    15. Re:Humor? by zobier · · Score: 1

      It's funny because I work for a VoIP provider and I'm pretty sure our CEO has done a spot of bee-keeping before. Bees -> Technology, interesting transition.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    16. Re:Humor? by hyfe · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot.org, not beedot.org. There aren't many people here with knowledge of the beekeeping industry. If this was about CPU fabrication, you'd see a thread full of detailed discussion on operations per cycle and whatever else.
      Instead of pitifull attempts at humour, you'd see pitifull attempts at technical discussion. Me, for one, can't really see the big distiction.
      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    17. Re:Humor? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      "Is this because there's nothing in the article for us to all argue about, or because everyone thinks this is funny?"

      The /. community is not all about arguing you insensitive clod!

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    18. Re:Humor? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      >What if herds of cattle started vanishing mysteriously out of fields,

      The price of beef would go through the roof, hamburgers would be expensive, and Americans would become a lot healthier.

  33. In other news... by purify0583 · · Score: 0

    Today, on the lawn of the white house, onlookers noticed a crudely written message in honey that read "So long and thanks for all the pollen."

    P.S. love how this got tagged bug :)

  34. Re:Go back to Digg, take your grammar with you! by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    It's either:
    Al Gore ate them. (as in past tense)

    Or

    Al Gore eats them. (as in present tense)

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  35. ou'll release the dogs, or the bees, or... by laejoh · · Score: 0

    Don't tell me the dogs DID inhale???

  36. A proven cause of the decline in Europe by Toffins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Giant Asian Hornets arrived in Europe in 2004 and are voracious predators of honeybees and wasps. There were two colonies of wasps in my family's house's roof space in summer 2005. In mid August, we suddenly started seeing giant hornets entering our house in the evenings after dusk (they have excellent night vision). I captured one in a glass jar to get rid of it and put it outside and measured its body length as 5.5cm. I killed another one that started hitting on my wife for no apparent reason. It was certainly a hornet. I also saw them entering the roof space through gaps next to the guttering. One week later both of the wasp nests were completely empty of life and we also saw no more hornets in the house that summer. A local entomologist said the hornets had eaten the wasps and then left in search of more food. Contrary to what the article says, I can confirm from personal experience that they do have a heck of a sting (in addition to a painful bite). Keep well away from these critters!

    1. Re:A proven cause of the decline in Europe by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yellowjackets will kill and eat bees. In some areas beekeepers put a mesh gate over the hive entrance, cuz otherwise the yellowjackets will wipe out the whole colony.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  37. GMO crops are a likely culprit. by voxelman · · Score: 0, Troll

    The seed manufacturers (read Monsanto) have integrated herbicide and pesticide resistance genes into major grain crops like corn and soybeans. I also think they have added genes to cause the plants to produce their own herbicide. Now a major food chain dependency is collapsing and they wonder why.

    Bees collect and consume pollen. Pollen is concentrated genetic material from plants. Is it any wonder that this could be having a negative effect on bees?

  38. Scientists? by encoderer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists? Please.

    These are the people who don't believe in the book of Genesis, for chrissake.

    <cite: bill maher>

    1. Re:Scientists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be "for mosessake?" Guess not. Sounds too much like some kosher Japanese firewater.

  39. They are in the middle of war! by kabocox · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africanized_bee

    Those poor honey bees are in middle of war! TFA said it was illness by mites that are the main thing. Well, that's just what the Africanized bees want us to think. The Africanized bees are bringing their mites to do biowarfare against the lowly honey bee! Oh no! We are being invaded and losses in our domesticated bee population are terrible! We need to support our commerical allies the honey bees in their war aganist Africanized bees and their bio warfare mites before our agriculture collapses!

  40. GE & Pharma Crops? by renota · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it could be the genetically modified plants (eg pesticides & herbicides spliced in) or pharma crops (drugs spliced into plants).

  41. We could create by GregPK · · Score: 1

    Hummingbird factories. Hummingbirds have a farther reach than most bees and will do most of the same job. We just have to create heated homes for them and train them to take over the job that bees have been doing for years.

  42. Why we need bees when we have the Mexicans? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The agro business will just let it be known to the coyotes that they will be need more hands to do the pollinating because the bees are all dead. The coyotes will deliver more poor desperate Mexicans to the farms. The farmers will pay them as much as they pay the bees now. They have to just suck nectar from the blossoms. No social security, no payroll tax, no workman comp, no time-and-a-half overtime ... The talk radio will denounce the illegal Mexicans taking away the job that used to be done by the American bees. They will be strangely silent on the rich, educated Legal American employers flouting the law and focus exclusively on the law breaking by the poor illiterate despo Illegal Immigrants. Sorry I was shooting for funny but more likely ended up as flamebait.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  43. Sounds like it might be pesticides by AaronW · · Score: 1

    I came across an interesting article at http://www.everythingabout.net/articles/biology/an imals/arthropods/insects/bees/aa/vanishing_part1.s html which discusses pesticide use and bees.

    All it takes is for a field within the range of the bee hive to use a pesticide which can harm the bees and all the bees will suffer, since workers carry it back to the hive.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  44. Preliminary ecological correlations by Baldrson · · Score: 0

    I wasn't able to get quantitative data on the geography of CCD but I was able to get a map of states reporting CCD has occurred there. So I ran these correlations at the level of state ecologies:

    42 with log(YugoslavianPercapita1990)
    42 with -log(PrisonerDeathsPerInCustody1983)
    41 with -log(PrisonerDeathsMalePerInCustody1983)
    41 with -IrishPercapita1990
    37 with SwissPercapita1990
    36 with log(CostOfLivingRank2000)
    36 with sqrt(DanishPercapita1990)
    35 with log(FoodInsecureWithHungerPercentage3YearAverageSt arting2000)
    35 with log(HungerPercentage3YearAverageStarting2000)
    35 with log(NorwegianPercentOfWhites)
    34 with log(FinnishPercapita1990)
    34 with -DefenseExpendituresPercapita1997
    33 with log(NorwegianPercapita1990)
    33 with log(AirTrafficPercapita1999)
    32 with log(DutchPercapita1990)
    32 with sqrt(AirTrafficScheduledPercapita1999)
    31 with log(MalesPer100Females2000)
    30 with log(InjectedIllegalDrugUsingPercentHighSchoolFemal es2001)
    30 with log(CostOfLivingTransportation2000)
    30 with log(AdultMalesPer100AdultFemales2000)
    30 with SwedishPercapita1990
    30 with -French_CanadianPercapita1990
    30 with AustrianPercapita1990
    29 with PrisonerDeathsFemalePerInCustody1998
    29 with -log(PrisonerDeathsFemalePerInCustody1994)
    28 with -FrenchPercapita1990
    28 with log(AirTrafficNonScheduledMailTonsPercapita1999)
    28 with -log(PrisonerDeathsFemalePerInCustody1995)
    28 with log(WhiteYearsSchooling2000)
    28 with -IllegalSteroidUsingPercentHighSchoolMales2001
    27 with log(Other_groupsPercapita1990)
    27 with -HateCrimeEstimatedPercapita2000
    27 with AgeUnder18Percentage2000
    27 with log(ImmigrantsMexicoPercapita1998)
    27 with -MethamphetamineUsingPercentHighSchoolMales2001
    26 with WelshPercapita1990
    26 with sqrt(AirTrafficScheduledMailTonsPercapita1999)
    26 with log(AirTrafficPassengersPercapita1999)
    26 with sqrt(AirTrafficMailTonsPercapita1999)
    26 with -log(Age44To64Percentage2000)
    25 with log(AirTrafficNonScheduledFreightTonsPercapita1999 )
    25 with -log(AlcoholAbstainersPercentage1988)
    25 with -log(MedianAge2000)
    25 with -sqrt(United_States_or_AmericanPercapita1990)
    25 with log(FoodInsecureWithOrWithoutHungerPercentage3Year AverageStarting2000)
    25 with log(CostOfLivingHealthCare2000)

  45. Re:Go back to Digg, take your grammar with you! by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

    or
    Al Gore, eat them. (as in telling Al Gore to eat them)

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
  46. Maybe it's the mosquito poison by dudeX · · Score: 1

    I live in Manhattan, New York City and every summer used to be a chore because bees would love to hang out in my apartment and I am afraid of bees. Then there was the West Nile Virus scare in the late 90's and the Mayor Rudy Guiliani decided to spray deadly melathione poison to kill mosquitoes. Subsequently every summer after that one, I rarely had bees come in through the window into my apartment.

    In fact, I barely see any bees hanging out by the garbage bins since the late 90s, and probably seen more bees of the giant variety in park areas.

    There's something wrong with the environment, and I can't say for sure what it is, but it may have to do with new pesticides, or even GM food. Who knows...

    1. Re:Maybe it's the mosquito poison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our navigational species seems to be having lots of problems lately, maybe if we find out what is happening to the bees it will tell us what is happening to the whales and dolphins. Birds haven't had the best of times in recent years either and most of their problems have been blamed on pesticide.

  47. Logical fallacy by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    Damn you beat me to it! I can't belive it's not there, coming from such a liberal biased rag as the NYT!

    I don't recall my philosophy classes well enough to remember if this is a defined formal fallacy. ie: A) subjective stipulation; B) Evidence that contradicts a; C) regardless, assertion of a. In this example: A) NYT is a "liberal biased rag", B) NYT fails to advance a "liberal" cause in this case, C) Nevertheless, NYT is liberal. For why, exactly? For failing to advance the liberal cause?

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:Logical fallacy by alta · · Score: 1

      Glad I didn't take philosophy... Logic was hard enough. Well, it doesn't matter. The statement was just BS designed to wind people up, since the Parent had already made the statement I wanted to make.

      Yes, I was trolling. No doubt about it. Trying to lower some of this Karma. I'm a curmudgeon and excellent karma doesn't seem to go in line with that very well.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    2. Re:Logical fallacy by alta · · Score: 1

      I appoligize for offending you. As you can see from my ID#, I've been around for a while, and this is the first time I've become someone's foe. Unsettling.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    3. Re:Logical fallacy by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      You admit to trolling. I attempt to remove that kind of noise from my correspondence when possible, as it obscures genuine purposeful communication.

      And please, don't believe it's because I disagree with your views, which I do. It's quite simply for the reason above.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  48. Causes - GMO? by duplo1 · · Score: 1

    I didn't read TFA, but NPR reported this a few weeks ago. According to the NPR report, they performed autopsies on the few bees that were found dead in the vicinity of the colony. Apparently, they suffered from odd cysts and internal lesions. One possibility that hasn't been discussed is that genetically modified crops might be part the equation. I know we all love CRM'd (Crop Rights Management??) crops, but it wouldn't be the first time that an ecosystem has been threatened by a combination of GMO crops and the over-application of herbicides.

  49. Possible reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest problem is that the bees were bred to have short life spans and to polinate over production of honey. The other big problem is the hives are only in one place for a short time creating an orientation problem for the bees. Almond producers should have flowering ground cover that would allow bees to have a hive in the same location all year if they are serious about the problem.
    Also bringing back older strains of bees would help. Ones that make more honey and less polination but are more hardy and live longer.
    Having delt with the bee industry I can say the days of truck loaded honey bees will end one day.

  50. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by LordPhantom · · Score: 3, Funny

    It may seem silly but it is a critically important roll that the bees have to crop production.
    It's not silly at all! I, like you, believe in the great insectoid pastry from whence all food production pours forth!

  51. Duh... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    What does it say about our current lifestyle when even the bees are over stressed?

    That we need to make smaller Prozac pills?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  52. Actually by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    It's just that not even the bees can afford to live in Manhattan anymore.

  53. Science and reality are liberal plots by gelfling · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Tune in to Fox News and hear the truth. Science and Reality are evil plots to turn your kids into muslim lesbian liberal queer feminists.

  54. No, you fool! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    The Amercican bees are just too lazy. They're all heading off to beehives where they aren't expected to work. But soon we'll have bees sneaking in from Mexico, and everything will be fine again!

    1. Re:No, you fool! by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Really? I heard it was because pollination was being outsourced to the flies. Apparently they're willing to do it for 10% of the bee's salaries. Of course, the flies have no idea how to pollinate a crop, but nobody will notice until the VP is long gone, with the big bonus for reducing costs this year.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    2. Re:No, you fool! by NZBeeMan · · Score: 1

      They will have to bring them in for the almond crop soon as there are just not the bees/beekeepers to cover the pollination.

      Yet another beekeeping /. reader.

  55. What REALLY happened by mrjb · · Score: 1

    "bees are disappearing -- not returning while searching for nectar and pollen. [...] Theories include viruses, some type of fungus, poor bee nutrition, and pesticides." What REALLY happened though, was that the bees got abducted by aliens. Complete with anal probes and everything.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  56. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by unity · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Like most of the un-funny posts to this article already"
    --I really wish it was possibly to filter out the posts modded "Funny". It would reduce the noise on /. so much that it might even be worth reading again. Everybody wants to crack one liners. It's all complete drivel. I guess when people have nothing intelligent to say, they rely on trying to be funny.

    "The problem stems from the Killer Bees infiltrating a colony of another type of bee and wiping out the colony. Since the killer bees do exhibit the same food gathering and other critical behaviors to pollination, the lost colonys have a bigger impact. I can see the fungus, virus, pesticide and other aspects causing problems in climates farther north but I would not doubt that Killer Bees could be a large contributing factor to this problem."
    --I doubt it, if it was case of Killer Bees wiping out a colony, I would think that there would be evidence. ie: thousands of dead bees around the hive. From what I have read (this article and another few a couple weeks ago) the bees are just "disappearing", no sign of what happened. Here is a link somebody else posted on another blog: National Geographic: Bees Battle Hornets from Hell

  57. This is your brain on drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although their are legitimate concerns with GMO crops, your chain of illogic (bees are dying from eating concentrated genetic material from plants... that cracks me up) is a desperate plea from some neurons deep in your brain for you to spend less time reading Slashdot and more time reading books.

  58. Enough with the global warming... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The scientific evidence not to mention the history of man long long long before industry shows conclusively that Earth has been much warmer in the past and also much colder. It has had varying cycles since long before we got here and it will be varying long after we get hit by a car while admiring our digital watches.

    Whether or not we arrived on Earth, it was DEFINITELY going to get warmer than even now, and it was going to do it right around now, then go into another glacial. The Earth hasn't been Mayberry RFD for all eternity until we showed up.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  59. Everything's a Disorder now? by CycleMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Warning: this comment does not contain puns, jokes, or attempts at humour except for British spelling.

    Why is everything that doesn't go according to our plan labeled a disorder? Boys are no longer restless; they're ADD. We don't get the winter doldrums; we suffer from Seasonal-Affective Disorder. Gulf War vets don't get shell-shock; they get Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. I don't move in my sleep; I have Restless Leg Syndrome. And now bees get Colony Collapse Disorder.

    Judging by all these labels, one would think the entire universe were machined to such high tolerances it couldn't handle these deviations from someone's definition of the ideal. And yet somehow the world survived for thousands of years before it developed its affinity for labeling everything a disorder. That's the real monoculture to be concerned with, a society that believes only one personality type is desirable.

    1. Re:Everything's a Disorder now? by sanso999 · · Score: 1

      I guess that was offtopic, but there's a point to be made about these labels. Colony Collapse sounds like shoddy work on the behalf of the beekeepers, rather than something the rest of us need worry about. However, I'm with whoever said we should make Mason bee hives. If I can manage to get outside long enough, that is.

  60. I've seen mass bee deaths in California by glyph42 · · Score: 1

    I've seen hundreds of bees crawling around, apparently unable to fly, on several occasions here in California. I see a lot of them on sidewalks, on tennis courts, on my terrace, on concrete steps. They crawl around, buzzing pitifully. I've tried to help them, but they can't fly, or at least can't fly for more than a couple seconds at a time. They all die within a matter of hours after that. I've swept dozens of dead bees of my terrace. It's kind of sad, and disturbing. When I heard about these "hive collapses", I thought of all those dead bees I saw. Could be related.

    --
    Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  61. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Bees are dying?

    Maybe they haven't perfected the black oil yet.

  62. 80% die-off due to beetles by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No kidding colorado and New Mexico are being ravaged by bark beetles. Outside my window the entire canyon is 80% dead trees. I'm not exagerating. that's the official figure. It's expected many ski areas in colorado will be baren within the decade. he last few winter cycles have not been cold enough. On the flip side, the birds look chubbier. But they will leave when the trees are all gone. And after all the trees fall over in ten years the rocky baren mountain sides will look handsome. Right now they look uggly with all the black limbess sticks.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:80% die-off due to beetles by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The mountains in south america are covered with trees.

      I'm sure the plants will come (tho at a slower pace than the insects).

      Humans have tried to do this artificially with terrible results so we are hesitant to introduce new species these days so it will probably have to happen naturally. But it will.

      I doubt the spruce trees can adapt quickly enough.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:80% die-off due to beetles by lahvak · · Score: 1

      I do not want to discount the danger of global warming, but in this case it does not necessarily have to be the cause. In central Europe in 80's, whole mountain ranges of forests were destroyed by bark beetles after the trees were weakened by acid rain and air polution. I remember when I was growing up, these were places where you could hike all day and never leave the forest. When I went there 10 years later, all I was were barren hills, with no coniferous trees left, and only an occational beech, oak or maple left.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:80% die-off due to beetles by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      >Outside my window the entire canyon is 80% dead trees.
      Better watch out. The next forest fire will take care of them.

    4. Re:80% die-off due to beetles by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      >Outside my window the entire canyon is 80% dead trees.
      Better watch out. The next forest fire will take care of them.
      Oddly enough, it turns out dead trees are not easily susceptible to forest fires. Forest fires get explosively hot from the burning branches and needles and those are the first to go on dead trees. Then as they rot they actually take on more water.
      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  63. Beekeeping by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 1

    Having started beekeeping 5 years ago. I am looking forward to the next season.
    I have had to dial with mites and cold and queens killed by new beekeeper mistakes.
    This may be another challange, but like any from of agraculture there is a basic level of
    unprodictabiliry, hail, draut, disease, and the markets.

    This will be another chalange and will likely drive up the cost/value of this hobby.

    All I can say is buy local honey it is better, realy better.
    Find out about beekeeping is is a very different from computing.
    I find the differentses rewarding, if you are looking for something in a hobby
    that will test your skills in a very different way try beekeeping.

    Charles Puffer

  64. Some species do benefit ... by jc42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here in New England, one of the effects of the loss of honeybees has been a very visible recovery of native pollinators. At least it's visible if you have a garden and pay attention to what's happening there. In our yard, we've seen a huge increase in the number of bumblebees over the past few years. We used to see only a few per day; now in the summer you can almost always see several at a time. Of course, you don't get a whole lot of honey from a bumblebee's nest.

    Anyway, the local wildlife people have long considered the honeybee an alien invader, much like English sparrows and starlings. They were introduced to North America by humans, and have crowded out many native species.

    The natives are doing much better with the honeybees mostly gone. Now if we could find something that kills off English sparrows and starlings in large numbers. Honeybees at least provide honey, but nobody can think of anything that those two kinds of birds are good for.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Now if we could find something that kills off English sparrows and starlings in large numbers. Honeybees at least provide honey, but nobody can think of anything that those two kinds of birds are good for.

      Target practice! At least in Michigan, and at least according to my memory, those two were the only birds that you could kill indiscriminately. Starlings are better target practice, since they're bigger and more difficult to confuse with native birds that you could get in trouble for shooting.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Some species do benefit ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Target practice!

      Heh; you're right. English sparrows are both small and similar to the native song sparrows that frequent our feeder (at the rate of maybe one song sparrow to every 100 English sparrows), so they're not good targets. But starlings are quite distinctive and a lot bigger, so there should be no problem using them as targets.

      Of course, shooting guns within city limits, even here in the burbs, is sorta frowned on.

      A while back in another forum, I read a discussion of the recent rapid decline of the English sparrow population in England. There were suggestions that Americans could trap a few million of the cute little buggers and ship them back to their ancestral homeland. Other objected that it would have to be a few billion to make a real dent in their North American population. But the discussion died without anyone describing a practical way to trap that many of them.

      Now if we could find an equivalent of the varroa mite for English Sparrows ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while we're at it.... there is this particularly nasty invasive species called Homo sapiens. The little buggers annihilate massive portions of the native life, fucking over the entire planet while their at it. At least honeybees make honey.

    4. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The natives are doing much better with the honeybees mostly gone. Now if we could find something that kills off English sparrows and starlings in large numbers. Honeybees at least provide honey, but nobody can think of anything that those two kinds of birds are good for.
      Notice how we wish to kill that of which has no productive use...
      Imagine that, us wishing to bring back the species we have killed off because we thought they had no use... thats never happened.
    5. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry - eradication efforts are underway even now.

      Few more years, and they'll be extinct.

    6. Re:Some species do benefit ... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Of course, you don't get a whole lot of honey from a bumblebee's nest.

      On the bright side, bumble production is up!

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    7. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Propaghandi · · Score: 0

      There is something that English sparrows and starlings are good for...Cat Food! (at least our cats think so!)

      Mike

      --
      "Who's your Diaper Daddy?"
    8. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Now if we could find something that kills off English sparrows and starlings in large numbers. Honeybees at least provide honey, but nobody can think of anything that those two kinds of birds are good for.


      The Chinese tried that.... city officials were annoyed by all the flocks of birds infesting their cities, so they put out some poison to kill all the birds. It worked great, in a few weeks all the birds were dead. The next year the city was practically buried under swarms of insects.


      Turns out that birds are a very useful way to control the insect population...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    9. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not so. Starlings can be easily confused with blackbirds.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:Some species do benefit ... by jc42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are several similar stories in the US. Some cities have found the hard way that eliminating various "pest" species, including pigeons and rats, leads to huge increases in the insects that eat the garbage that those species had been hogging for themselves. If you want to clean up such pests, you need to also clean up all the garbage. Pigeons and rats are actually much better at this than humans.

      There was also a story some years back about a farming area in California where the people decided to eradicate "vermin", which included skunks and foxes. They succeeded so well that the area was overrun with mice. It got so bad that people had trouble driving down the roads due to the slippery surface caused by all the squashed mice. When the story was written up, people from all over started offering to trap some of their local skunks and foxes and ship them out to control the mice. The folks there weren't too amused by these gracious offers.

      In our area (the western suburbs of Boston), a few years ago there was a heavy outbreak of lawn grubs that devastated most of the lawns. We and a few neighbors didn't have any problems, though. We refused to spray our lawns, and we have woods nearby. We started meeting skunks when we came home an night, and we also saw a lot of small "divots" where the skunks had dug up grubs. We pressed the dug-up grass back in the hole, and everything was fine.

      We did have a couple of incidents in which a young skunk claimed our back yard as his territory, and threatened us when we came home at night. But we found that we could calmly explain to him that it was ok; we were just going into the house. He reacted by slowly walking away, while keeping a careful eye on us.

      We didn't have any mice in the house that year, either.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    11. Re:Some species do benefit ... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The British environment agency have conducted a study into the declining populations of these birds in the UK.

      All you need to do is the reverse of what is suggested in this report, e.g. eliminate all grassland from arable farming areas and they will soon die off.

      http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/respr og/findings/sparrow/execsumm.pdf

    12. Re:Some species do benefit ... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      The same can be said about the elimination of the wolf packs that used to roam the Appalachians and surrounding areas. Now there are so many deer running around folks hit them daily. And since Hunters are 'bad people,' you get to have a new hood ornament on your drive to work. But I guess folks want to make sure little Susie and Jimmy are 'safe' in their back yard.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    13. Re:Some species do benefit ... by nCnt++ · · Score: 1
      Now if we could find something that kills off English sparrows and starlings in large numbers. Honeybees at least provide honey, but nobody can think of anything that those two kinds of birds are good for.

      Carrying coconuts?

      --
      Have you ever noticed the best /. comments are long and the best Chuck Norris jokes are short?
  65. Small Hive Beetles and Varroa mites by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My dad is was a bee-keeper as part of his duties as a park ranger and the bee populations have been dwindling like crazy here in the Southeast USA. The Varroa are bad, but today the main culprit seems to be Small Hive Beetles putting stress on the hives. They are absolutely devastating the bee industry here in the south, and it looks like they are going to take over the whole country. We tried to set my dad up with an apiary at home and we got everything set up, the hive, the supers, and ordered the bees. When they arrived, it was not even two minutes -- literally two minutes -- before the first beetles showed up and they just kept on coming. Their ability to find bees is uncanny. We tried many things to stop them or slow them down but needless to say, the colony gave up in the first few weeks. Heartbreaking.

    --
    +0 Meh
  66. Perhaps......... by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

    Its because they are all reading Slashdot and for the gazillionmph time they read that every other OS is better than Windows. Slashdot - if we aint bashing Windows then its then end of the world... Seeing they just upgraded thier hive system to Vista, they read Slashdot and they all had a fit of depression and died....... Or maybe its because I have been collecting those micro bee fibers from thier bodies and I am going to release a new line of clothing with my revolutionary "Bee-Weave" Material... Really, perhaps its just because theres SO DAMN MANY of them that Nature may be culling the herd so to speak, just like its doing with the Human race with super diseases like AIDS etc.. Anyone ever think of that???

  67. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by superstick58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, Africanized Bees can be a benefit to the overall Bee productivity. They tend to be more productive in areas with proper climate (warm, and lots of rain). Many places have learned to breed the Africanized bees into gentler colonies that are manageable. Once the bees are bred to a manageable state, the output from the colony can be better than the original European bees. They have after all been doing it in Africa for quite a while, why not in other continents too?

  68. Simpler explanations for bee losses .... by waterbear · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, as another /.er who used to keep bees, I could point to some possible explanations that are simpler too:

    Hive-based diseases such as mites and fungi tend to kill bees in and around the hive.

    One common cause of bees failing to return home after foraging is poisoning by recently-applied pesticides. It's not pesticide use in general that's responsible, it happens more when a farmer applies pesticide close to when a crop is in bloom and attracting the bees.
    For just this reason, some agricultural pesticides come with instructions not to apply them within a window of time related to crop blooming, but like many instructions, users do not always read and follow them. If there is a new pesticide around, or a new fashion for how to apply an existing one, this could have big consequences for bee mortality.

    Then again, if the bees are not dying, but just not returning, this could be behavior based on the strain of bees. It could follow a change in strain chosen by large-scale bee-breeders and beekeepers. Colonies of some strains are bad at staying put in their hive, they tend to abscond, ie relocate, specially when short of stores and brood. Absconding is a bit different than swarming, where a nucleus of bees is left behind to carry on the old colony. Africanized bees, for example, are known as bad absconders as well as swarmers.

    -wb-

    1. Re:Simpler explanations for bee losses .... by smokin_juan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, this explanation may not be simple, but I'm putting it out here anyways because it includes factors that make an interesting story.

      You need to read at least 1/2 way through that article to get to the interesting stuff, but it basically says that radio waves in the 250Hz range will misdirect the navigational function of bees. It talks about Russian bee studies and and the possibility of foul play by said Russians with mind control devices (250Hz also causes agitation in humans) and the like.

      Though that explanation is satisfying to me I'm sure there are people out there that would instantly deem this a conspiracy theory and reject it out of hand. In order to thwart those attempts I'll include a second theory - 240Hz is a subharmonic of our 60Hz power system and as electrical consumption increases so do the electromagnetic fields produced by the system... i.e. we've reached the consumption point of overhead power transmission that generates enough EM to dislocate the bees.

      If you'd like to keep bees you'll need a bigger Faraday cage.

    2. Re:Simpler explanations for bee losses .... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Geez, it's a plague -- I used to work for a beekeeper :)

      Now I'm out in the desert, in an area where honeybees are seldom seen, and the lack of garden pollinators is a distinct problem. -- There is a hive somewhere near my house, but it's apparently not much of a colony, and short on resources. They look better this winter, but last winter they were all pale, weak, and looked decidedly undergrown (I fed them all winter, which apparently helped). They follow me around every morning looking for water, but they're not at all aggressive -- unlike the seriously-nasty Africanized bees that have become predominant only 15 miles from here.

      (For some reason they think the water that comes out of the kennel sprayer is much better than the other sources here, that would be easier to get to!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  69. CCD/Dwindling Disease - it's real by xC0000005 · · Score: 1
    The bees are just gone. Not frozen in a cluster (as so often happens with T-Mites/cold snaps). Not piled in front of the hive (common when the colony takes a heavy loss). Not laying on the bottom board in layers (mites & a host of others). Just a handfull of workers, a queen and various brood. Some blame nutrition, others disease, still more chemicals, a few blame aliens (just try probing a honeybee).

    No solutions yet. We don't understand it well enough to solve.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
    1. Re:CCD/Dwindling Disease - it's real by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      I assure you, now that the Slashdot community has been alerted a solution will be ready in not time at all. And you can rest assured that it will be freely downloadable in an open format via some FTP server somewhere (CD mailed to you for a nominal processing fee).

      Really. Read through the posts in this topic. I had no idea Slashdotters were expert on the subject of bees. It seems that once you know how to program a computer, or at least download what someone else has programmed, everything else falls in line.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  70. Crystal honeycomb... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny
    Across the US, beekeepers are finding that their bees are disappearing -- not returning while searching for nectar and pollen.

    That explains the crystal honeycomb I received in the mail last week. It was engraved, "So long and thanks for all the flowers."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  71. you win the award by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    for most confusing comment without being cryptic/obsfucated..... EVER

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  72. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

    Sorry sir, I don't mean to be on your lawn, but I wanted to let you know that if you click here: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm and scroll down (use the page down, or "arrow" key) to the section marked Reason Modifier you can set all Funny comments to have a -4 rating added to their scores, effectively filtering them from the other comments. I'll let you get back to walking up hill in the snow, sorry to take your time.

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  73. I think someone has too much sugar by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    Beekeeper 1: Well, very clever, Simpson, luring our bees to your sugar pile and selling them back to us at an inflated price.
    Homer: Bees are on the what now?

  74. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by mikkelm · · Score: 1

    You could try getting off your low-UID high horse and -6 funny mods instead of complaining. That feature is there to assist humourless asses like yourself in perpetuating your anally retentive existances.

  75. Valinor by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are departing these shores forever. They are traveling to the Grey Havens, never to be seen in Middle Earth again.

    Oh, bees.

    nevermind.

    1. Re:Valinor by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      You can laugh now, but what if Douglas Adams was wrong, and it's not mice, but honeybees? :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  76. Crossbreeding by hoggoth · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The problem is widely believed to be due to crossbreeding. The "mutt" bees get their homing insticts mixed up.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Crossbreeding by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Redundant? Redundant?! Did you even click on the link?
      -1 lazy moderating

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  77. Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay attention, everything else is a canard, it's all due to Pesticides.

  78. Maybe... by tsnorquist · · Score: 1

    The Bees are just sick of working and are taking a holiday for a bit. Cut em' some slack.

  79. No, not GMO by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 1

    Remember GM crops were replacing insecticide sprays, far less bugs (earthworms, frogs, fish, etc.) are killed. Actually, the BT toxins are incredibly specific to small families of bugs. There are separate types of BT toxin for strains of caterpillars, beetles, etc. So bees would not be affected, UNLIKE previous pesticides.

    The whole monarch thing is a straw man argument that misses the point. Monarch larva close enough to be exposed to a rapidly degrading, natural pesticide in pollen were going to be killed by pesticide sprays anyway, along with beneficial insects like lady bugs. Environmentally, GM crops can be a huge benefit.

    Now a real concern might be the overuse of BT toxin, which would result in pest resistance. BT is one of the only effective pesticides available to organic farmers. Normally, it breaks down too quickly for bugs to develop resistance but the constant presence in GM crops creates an environment that better selects for resistance.

  80. Thanks for that. by unity · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long that's been there. Cheers!

  81. For example: Vanilla by mangu · · Score: 1
    Vanilla is an orchid originally from Mexico that can only be pollinated by a certain small Mexican bee. Although the plant can be reproduced from stem shoots, no one outside of Mexico could produce the seeds from which the flavoring comes from until someone invented an artificial method to pollinate the plant.


    I know all this because my father had a vanilla plant in his home, yet he could never get the hang of how to do the pollination. It seems that there is a certain trick to it which my father, although a great "green thumb" and avid book reader, could never get from reading descriptions. Plant sex seems to have some similarities to the human type...

  82. I blame racism... by csoto · · Score: 1

    I mean, these "european" bees hear that "africanized" bees are moving into their neighborhoods and they pack up the SUV and move to the 'burbs...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  83. Could it be Bt Corn? by Karl+J.+Smith · · Score: 1
    I have no clue what's actually causing the issue, since I know little about bees, but the first thing I thought of when I saw the picture of the guy pouring liquid corn syrup into the hive was that maybe the corn syrup was made from Bt corn (genetically modified to kill insects), and that's what's killing the bees.

    Maybe somebody has already disproved this wild theory.

    Bt corn seems to spread like mad.

    I found one study that says that Bt corn pollen is OK to feed to bees, but I that's pollen, not corn syrup.

    1. Re:Could it be Bt Corn? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BT corn is only going to kill caterpillars (corn earworms), not bees.

      I am very much against the use of genetically modified corn, in large part because it's likely to render one of the best weapons in an organic gardener's (or farmer's) arsenal ineffective with a decade. But the bacterium is specific to one particular family of pests - bees will not be affected by this.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Could it be Bt Corn? by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 1

      How about jest the fact that corn suger is not nector. When I need to feed my bees they get real suger. I was tempted by the premixed easy looking idea of corn sweetener. And I am sure it looks good to comertial beekeepers. But in the end it is not nector.
      Burnt suger make bees sick and kill them, maybe some of the corn sweetener is getting two hot in processing.
      But the fact that the hives are discribed as empty makes is interesting. Almost any diseasse I can think of would cause a hive full of dead bees or a pile of dead bees at the door.
      Maybe there is something in the environment that is tricking the chemical signals the bees normaly use to comunicate into doing the wrong thing.

  84. Why Worry? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    It's just Natural Selection in Action. The ones that mutate favorably to work in the new environment will survive, new and improved! Sit back and enjoy the show.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Why Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a heck of a show it may turn out to bee. (lol, "bee"!) No seriously, as said in above posts, our crops and herds are much more specialized than they ever used to be. We sit in a delicate balance in a game with high stakes.

  85. Not sure about programming & bees by xC0000005 · · Score: 1
    but then I did start keeping them after I learned to code. Now the bees are a lot like code in that there are many, many rules, and as many exceptions to the rules as there are conditions they apply to.

    I was fortunate I didn't loose any bees to CCD. A lot of commercial keepers have, and I'm hearing stories of Almond loads arriving empty. Not your usual dead out. Empty. Look for an article by Dick Marron in ABJ this month that goes into detail.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  86. First the bees... by pestie · · Score: 1

    First the bees start disappearing, now the P's as well. We're doomed.

  87. Beecocked by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    In english: The bees help the plants have sex.

    This translation really hits home to those Something Awful users who were around when threads still got beecocked.

  88. So Are Africanized bees affected too? by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    The whole point of the Africanized Bee experiments in Brazil (that created the Killer Bee Hybrid) was to create a bee that was hardier in warm/tropical climates? So if the Africanized Bees are also effected, the it definitely is not Global Warming.

    On the other hand, if the africanized bees are not effected, if might be global warming (or more likely some resistance they carry). But more immediately, then bee keepers will have to learn to handle them in replacement of the European/Italian Bee ,as beekeepers have been forced to in South and Central America. If that is the case, the the "Killer Bee" might be the salvation of the bee industry after all.

    1. Re:So Are Africanized bees affected too? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if the Africanized Bees are also effected, the it definitely is not Global Warming.
      Yes, Africanized bees are affected. However, I think you miss the point, there are two factors at work.

      Yes, Africanized bees are more heat-tolerant. The red mites are one of the factors limiting their penetration into most of the US. However, non-Africanized bees in colder climates are also affected by the red mites -- and a streak of warm winters means these bees are having more problems with the mites. It just so happens that Africanized bees and red mites are two species affected by the climate.

      That said, the problems I experienced with mites likely has nothing specific to do with the subject of TFA -- it's just an example of how climate change can affect species viability.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  89. Re:I realize that this post is supposed to be a jo by zlexiss · · Score: 1

    I just thought he was talking about the bees making a saving throw against the alien abductions

  90. Cause? GM Crops and the complemtary pesticides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Reasons for this problem, dubbed 'colony collapse disorder,' are still unknown

    Seems pretty obvious that its GM crops and the incredibly toxic pesticides that the GM crops are immune to.
    Damage the ecosystem and lots of creatures leave, some you want to leave and many that you don't.

    I know someone that is a professor at a UK university, a consultant to Monsanto, consulting on GM crops.
    I met him once at his house. He told me GM crops were safe. 5 minutes later he told me he grows his own
    vegatables organically (i.e. uses no chemicals whatsoever). I asked him why. His answers were weak and
    unconvincing. The conclusion is clear, he doesn't believe that GM crops are safe.

    GM crops - just say no.

  91. Reason for bees dissapearing by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> Theories include viruses, some type of fungus, poor bee nutrition, and pesticides." ...or could it be those guys in Monsanto coveralls sneaking round the countryside with flamethrowers killing all the bees thay can find, so farmers have to buy GM crop seed?

  92. Dead Bee Rising by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

    Apparantly they have all been used to transfer a virus, that was originally an experiment in Santa Cebeza to produce larger meat breed cows.
    The fact that they can be trapped in a glass bottle, and smashed to eliminate dozens off zombies at once, has lead to their demise.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  93. What about space-honey bees? by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    Those bees are larger than most Buicks and twice as ugly.

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  94. I blame the americans by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I think they're right. I think the virus is humanity. We must be doing something the bees don't like. Maybe it's the part about destroying natural habitats and squeezing them into little wooden boxes where a creepy smelly redneck dude comes over every day to blow smoke in their eyes. Or maybe all this crap we're doing to the planet with commercial GMOs and all these bombs exploding might be doing nasty things to the little insects' genetic makeup, and it's not like they have hospitals in those wooden boxes either.

    I guess we'll just have to invent a robotic bee thing, because we certainly can't stop reproducing and blowing shit up, that would be inhumane.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  95. Hokum! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like more "world is round" and "global warming" hokum from the left leaning mainstream media. I get all my news from FOX and Little Green Footballs and they say everything is fine. Fine and dandy!

  96. No, Actually, It's WIFI Interference.... by Lord+Balto · · Score: 1

    Recent research at the Lysenko Institute of Alternate Studies in St Petersburg has determined that the bees' until now poorly understood method of geolocation is subject to interference from mobile internet connections. ;-)

  97. So Long.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Thanks For All The Pollen!

  98. slashdot is the perfect forum for this discussion by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    clearly, slashdot is the perfect forum for this discussion. i am sure there is no shortage of outdoorsey honeybee experts here who can contribute some valuable theories as to why bee colonies are failing all over the country.

    really, how many apiarists (i got that from wikipedia!) are there on slashdot?

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  99. GMO! by cluckshot · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is the GMO's. Sorry for those who think that it isn't so. There is a 1:1 correspondence. The gene that makes cotton and other crops resistant to pests also infects their pollen and nectar. The result is that after a bee has taken its fill of nectar, it succumbs to the poison in the nectar. As such a crop bees that goes for the pollen and nectar of such a GMO crop is doomed. The French are RIGHT!

    This is another in the long line of accomplishments of the GMO people. Unintended consequences of their actions bring real problems. The GMO people always deny these problems. For example, they told farmers that weeds were the problem with their crops and the roundup resistance gene was used to end weeds all together. It worked too! But with the weeds gone there was nothing to prevent soil erosion in the winter. So the farmers in my area now have to plant winter wheat to protect their soil and then kill it when the drill in their other crops in the spring. In the mean time the cost of cotton dropped by nearly 2/3 of the total price resulting in farmers being hardly able to make any money. Their machinery and loans and GMO payments became their slave masters. This stuff of playing with mother nature isn't exactly working out like the economics professors said it would.

    --
    Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    1. Re:GMO! by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do think the GMO theory deserves a very serious look. GMO have been known to cause problems for butterflys: http://www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/2000/000919.html .

      GMO organisms are artificial. These are DNA sequences and protiens that have been created in a way they never would have been in nature. Perhaps nature has a way of coding DNA in certain manners, and perhaps there are complex interdependancies between genes we dont know about, where if one gene is altered, it may have implications throughout the organism. Scientists claim to know what genes do, but they only know the tip of the iceberg, a gene may have numerous additional functions that they have no idea about.

      It could be that GMOs are fundamentally different in someway from natural food that makes them difficult to digest. Perhaps it causes a weakening of bee colonies.

      bees, humans, and so on have evolved for millions of years eating natural foods with DNA produces through natural processes. The further we get from those natural nutrition sources that are body is equipped to handle, the less efficiently your body may be able to use those foods. GMO food is unnatural food that has an unacceptably high risk. Usually i say it should be the choice of the consumer. This is so with food colours and additives. However, GMOs by their nature can contaminate non GMO crops where they are not wanted, endangering consumer choice and our right to whole, natural, and healthy foods. I do think GMOs should be banned for this reason, and the fact that non-GMO foods are natural and what we have been eating for millions of years.

    2. Re:GMO! by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      Your butterfly link is to research conducted under artificial conditions which do not reflect the level of exposure at a real farm. This anti-GMO lie has long been debunked for the fabrication it really is. See the USDA for more.

    3. Re:GMO! by tabrnaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, you really don't know how to read. Yes, the pollen is toxic, the page you linked doesn't deny that. In this situation we're talking about bees that intentionaly go around rolling in pollen, toxic levels would build up quickly. Learn some logical reasoning.

    4. Re:GMO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of butterfly is butterflies. (Not complaining, just trying to be informative)

    5. Re:GMO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, basically I agree, and oppose use of GMO crops. We don't understand it well enough.

      But it should be said that the foods we eat are mostly not really natural, but rather the products of artificial selection by farmers since the dawn of agriculture. Very much less than millions of years ago.

      It's possible to produce poisonous food without scientific GM too. There was an organic farmer who selected for a potato naturally resistant to pests. It had to be withdrawn because the reason it was naturally resistant was because of greatly increased cyanide levels in it's skin.

    6. Re:GMO! by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2, Informative

      bees, humans, and so on have evolved for millions of years eating natural foods with DNA produces through natural processes. The further we get from those natural nutrition sources that are body is equipped to handle, the less efficiently your body may be able to use those foods.

      You don't even need to artificially modify the genome, to encounter ill effects from eating non-natural "foods."

      HFCS (high-fructose corn syrup) could not be part of a genuinely natural diet, because it relies on an abundance of what we might falsely consider "natural" corn. This corn actually has been selectively bred for centuries to produce bigger and more sugar-laden varieties. And even with current varieties of corn, HFCS could not be produced in sufficiently large quantities, nor at sufficiently low cost, to compete with natural sources of sugar, except for the fact that it is highly subsidized by the GOP in exchange for the latter's near-dominance over the politics of agricultural states.

      But HFCS contains high levels of fructose, which, unlike other sugars, suppresses the production of a key hormone called leptin, which regulates appetite. This is currently believed to account for a significant portion of the increase in obesity of Americans, both relative to people elsewhere in the world, and also relative to previous generations of Americans.

      Our species f*cks with nature quite a bit. Mostly this is to our benefit . . . but not always. We should be much more careful about introducing rapid changes into environments we do not fully understand. And I say this even as an anarcho-capitalist. I don't believe in government solutions to private problems - or any other problems - but I also don't believe in doing f*cked-up experiments that affect the lives or property of other people without their consent. On that basis, I believe that GMO "food" should be clearly labeled as such, and should be grown in such a way that it cannot "accidentally" contaminate non-GMO crops. And agricultural should be neither subsidized nor taxed; markets should decide what is produced, when, and by whom. One result would be the eventual recovery of the miserable economy of Africa, which has been hurt greatly by agricultural subsidies in the developed world (especially the U.S.).

    7. Re:GMO! by scribblej · · Score: 1

      and the fact that non-GMO foods are natural and what we have been eating for millions of years.

      You're not thinking right. I'd love to write a long post about how stupid this comment is, but I really don't have the patience for people who think GMO food is inherently evil and "natural" foods are inherently better. THERE IS NO SIMPLE RULE.

      But here's what I'll say:

      If you can name for me ONE NATURAL FOOD, whether vegetable or animal, that is the same as it was one million years ago, I'll reply to your post with a sincere, "I'm sorry; I'm the idiot."

      I'll even make it one better. Forget a million years. Give me one plant or animal that people eat that is "the same" as it wa a mere 10,000 years ago. 10,000! That should be easy, right?

      I'd even push my luck and say you'd be hard-pressed (though I won't now claim it impossible) to find a food we eat that was the same merely a thousand years ago. All our grains, fruits, and vegetables have changed a LOT in the last thousand years. All our domesticated animals, too.

      All our eating animals and eating plants have been carefully cultivated and bred by man for a LONG time, and they havebeen genetically manipulated, the slow, old fashioned way -- through selective breeding.

      Anyone who thinks we've been eating the same food for millions of years is totally ignorant. If you think human beings have even been around for millions of years, you've got some studying to do.

  100. California Housing Prices by BlueQuark · · Score: 1

    The bees can no longer afford to live in their hives. They weren't dumb enough to get I/O and ARM and other exotic voodoo loans to afford their hives. The queens have decided to pack it up and move some place cheaper.

  101. Maybe... by Soiden · · Score: 1

    ...they found out there are better places than USA.

    --
    Minti: What's that huge shuriken in your back?! Kin: It's the instrument of my victory.
  102. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I killed another one that started hitting on my wife for no apparent reason.
    No suggestive moves on her part?

  103. Buckwheat honey by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Eeeeeeeew. I bought a gallon of raw buckwheat honey for brewing into mead. Just opening up the jug made my kitchen smell like wet dog -- for days. I'm hoping that it will taste good in the future. As it is, the carboy still smells like wet dog (and yeast).

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  104. What about a simpler theory? by carpeweb · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who believes bees are evil? That's gotta explain a lot of this. Or, maybe Einstein was a bee, in which case he might seem like the devil.

  105. Re:slashdot is the perfect forum for this discussi by Reziac · · Score: 1

    About a dozen have replied so far, which is probably a higher density of beekeepers than in the general populace. (And I count as half a beekeeper, since I worked for one for several years :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  106. Has anyone considered GM crops as a source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the previous respondents has noted that the spraying of pesticide on nearby crops will have an effect on the degree of absconding of bees.

    In the last few years the number of GM crops containing a bacterial toxin. Usually referred to at BT have grown in popularity due to the fact that they reduce the ammounts of pesticide going into the environment, this might even cause farmers who have previously not used presticides due the the dangers and difficulties of application to use the new GM varieties.

    This would cause previously nutritious flowers to have toxic nectar and polen, as the GM causes the toxin to be distributed through the entire plant. This would in turn cause lower polination rates due to insects.

    Laboratory trials in test patches would miss this effect as insects from outside the test plot would continue to polinate the toxic plants (an then die).

    When applied on a large scale they could have an effect on the insect population in the same area.

  107. Long magazine feature on honeybee decline by iwilker · · Score: 1

    OnEarth Magazine published an excellent piece last summer reporting on this situation: The Vanishing.

  108. Local by fanakabob · · Score: 1

    I would like to see some studies on the number of beekeepers today verses thirty years ago. I think that at one time beekeepers were more localized. Today, many people are buying honey from China and etc. It would seem that once again going local is the solution to many of these short studies. The number of bees will decrease as the number of small local beekeepers decrease.

  109. so long... by oohshiny · · Score: 1

    and thanks for all the nectar. Bzzzzzzz.

  110. Global Warming and Yellowjackets, maybe? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    As seen in the recent case of a classic Chevy being turned into a massive nest, and surviving longer than one season due to warmer winters:

    http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/comments/y ellow_jackets_in_alabama/

    And being that yellowjackets are closely related to the more predatory hornet (both species harvest various insects, including bees), and that yellowjackets harvest arthropods late in their yearly cycle (which would be extended, due to warmer winters), is it possible the bees are suffering predation? The hornet video below illustrated such an event.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=K05jTrOTgj0

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  111. No! It's The Rapture! by Melllvar · · Score: 1

    Sorry to disappoint y'all, but it turns out it was the bees all along. When The Big Guy said "be fruitful and multiply," did you honestly believe He was talking to you, when so many more obvious candidates were buzzing like maniacs all over creation?

    I mean, this is the same Dude who once treated you guys like some pack of gophers He found chewing up His lawn, isn't He? Yeah, I thought so ...

  112. A price tag on bees by moneyscience · · Score: 1

    This reminds of a recent LA Times article: "...Last year, two entomologists, one from Cornell University and the other from the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, figured that a $60-billion-a-year chunk of the U.S. economy is supported by wild bugs such as dung beetles and bees that pollinate plants, hasten the decomposition of manure, feed on crop pests and end up as dinner for birds, small mammals and fish..."

  113. Disapearing bee colonys by clambar · · Score: 1

    The Earth's magnetic field fluctuates. At present, it's weakening from what I've read. This confuses the bees, though they have metaphores to determine their location, the calibration is thrown off by changes in the Earth's magnetic field.

  114. Gaucho Pesticide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In France we have had the same problem. Bee raisers ( I don't know if the word is good ) said it was due to the Gaucho pesticide. Bees were loosing their path and didn't come back to hive. According to bee raisers since the Gaucho was forbidden, the situation is much better.

  115. Better gig at Los Alamos National Laboratory by LaTechTech · · Score: 1

    This crop pollinating stuff is for the dumb bees. They found a better paying gig at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Hell, they don't even have to fly anymore. They get harnessed in and stick out their proboscis when they smell explosives. Hell, they even get benefits like sugar solution when they perform well.

    --
    I want my! I want my! I want my Eee PC!
  116. Re:Could you spell any worse?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mein Gott en Himmel!

    Must.. Resist... No, I just can't let it pass, sorry.

    jest = just
    suger = sugar
    nector = nectar (You work with bees and get THIS wrong too?!)
    comertial = commercial
    getting two hot = getting TOO hot
    discribed = described
    diseasse = disease
    normaly = normally
    comunicate = communicate
    'Burnt suger(sic) make bees sick and kill them'?! Might I suggest 'makeS bees sick and can kill them'.

    And last but not least.. ANTS communicate with chemical signals. BEES communicate with dances and body movements.

    I weep for the future.

    Do continue..

  117. Sure are enough of them around my house by reyalpdemannu · · Score: 1

    I have to swat 4 or 5 between my front door and my truck every day. I must be hoarding them all or something.

  118. CCD aka Dwindle Disease by Understudy · · Score: 1

    Notice of Full Disclosure:
    I am vice president of the Palm Beach County Beekeepers.

    Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has caused a great deal of FUD amongst beekeepers, farmers, and the media. So speculation is running rampant. I am receiving 20 or more media stories a day on CCD. Most of them are copies of the same story. The media is asking us and other beekeepers lots of questions. The unfortunate fact is there are not a lot of answers. The studies are taking place but everything is so preliminary right now that they are still debating the possible causes. Symptons are still being discussed.

    The American Beekeeping Federation through one of it's subsideraries held a discussion in Stuart area of Florida. This is mentioned in the NY Times article. The meeting wasn't held to discuss a cure it was held to discuss the progress of the research. Unfortunatly the meeting was invitation only.

    The Mid Atlantic Apiculture is heading the reasearch into CCD. The most up to date information can be found on their site.

    Some notes on the reasearch. Currently it is only involving commercial beekeepers with mulitple hives. Hobbiest are not included. And since this is preliminary research there are no control groups or investigation into feral bees as to weather or not they are having this issue. The study according to Troy with the ABF does not involve different breeds of bees. So there is no seperate breakdown on how it affects Italians, russians, hygenics, buckfast, or other breeds. Please understand that Italians are by far the most common type of bee used.

    Commerical beekeepers are also the main focus since this affects their livelyhood. if you have 1000 hives and loose 400 of them to CCD that is a lot of money gone. If you are a hobbiest and you lose a hive life sucks but the impact isn't the same.

  119. The problem is obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone I know had an enormous honey-bee hive in her house last summer. They seemed to be extremely successful without any human "assistance", with what looked like several hundred bees in the air in front of the hive at any time.

    There are a couple differences between this and an agricultural hive:

    --The bees chose their own location, rather than being forced to live in an artificial hive. Those hives with the honeycomb "drawers" are optimized for the most honey, but they are also stressful to the bees (it disturbs the hive a LOT when you pull a honeycomb out) and known for making parasite problems worse (all the parasites are held inside instead of being allowed to fall out the bottom).

    --They were not moved around, and nobody took any of their honey.

    --They were not sprayed with anything (at least not until the exterminator showed up), and no pesticides were used on the area where they were foraging.

    There is another type of artificial hive that they use in Africa, which has vertical honeycombs that you pull out the top. It's possible to work with this type without disturbing the bees nearly as much (they only have "killer bees" in Africa, so this is something they would actually worry about), and the bottom is open, which allows mites / waste to fall out. They aren't used much in the USA because they produce a bit less honey, and take more time to work with, but from what I've read, it is easier to keep the bees alive in them...

  120. Bt Corn has been checked. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    But the bacterium is specific to one particular family of pests - bees will not be affected by this.

    Not necessarily. Just because the bacterium that generates the toxin only grows well in certain hosts doesn't mean that the toxin itself is harmless to other species. That aside, research currently shows that Bt corn (aka maize) does not affect honey bees.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Bt Corn has been checked. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Given the nature of how Bt works and how the genetically modified corn works... you're absolutely right. I didn't think that argument completely through.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  121. John Brunner warned us in 1988, 1972 by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    John Brunner wrote about bee population collapse and subsequent crop failure in Children of the Thunder (1988).

    Similar eco-degradation events happen in The Sheep Look Up (1972) and other Brunner novels.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  122. "feral bees"? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    And since this is preliminary research there are no control groups or investigation into feral bees as to weather or not they are having this issue.

    You mean, like, natural ones? :)

  123. Message from the bees by Asgerix · · Score: 1

    "So long, and thanks for all the sugar."

    --
    Life is wet, then you dry.
  124. Obligatory... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    It's Intelligent Pollination.

  125. Another alarmist by fm6 · · Score: 1

    You're really overstating the problem! By your own logic, only 60% of us are doomed!

  126. GPS by infonote · · Score: 1

    They should add a gps to the bees so the owners will know where they went.

    --
    Visit http://www.kaizenlog.com