You've overestimated the frequency changes by several orders of magnitude, but you're basically right. The peak frequency errors will be no larger: they may even be smaller (they're already quite small). They just won't bother inserting offsetting errors to make the average come out right. This will simplify network management.
They run at different frequencies just long enough to accumulate the desired phase difference. They then go back to identical frequencies and run at differing phases for as long as power needs to be sent. The tricky part is that stations C, D, E... are also involved.
Perhaps Firefox should take a page out of Ubuntu's playbook, and offer a special LTS (Long Term Support) release that will receive back-ported security fixes for the next two or three years.
It's Open Source. Anyone who wants to can do that. Debian does.
Believe it or not, the engineers that operate the network actually know what they are doing.
The flow of power between tied AC networks is determined by phase, not voltage. To adjust the phase between your generator and that of a neighbor to whom you wish to send power you must run faster than he for long enough to accumulate the desired phase difference. Such adjustments are going on constantly throughout the network and conflict with the requirement to keep the average frequency at exactly 60Hz. Relaxing the latter requirement will make network operations easier and more reliable.
You cannot trust a website you have never seen before to load code of its choosing to be executed on a driver supplied to you by third-party which may or may not have a stellar security record themselves.
Let's simplify that: You cannor trust a website to load code.
Slashdot Mirror
You've overestimated the frequency changes by several orders of magnitude, but you're basically right. The peak frequency errors will be no larger: they may even be smaller (they're already quite small). They just won't bother inserting offsetting errors to make the average come out right. This will simplify network management.
Half of Japan runs on 100V 50Hz.
Not much, but you'll never know from TFA. As usual, the "science" reporter is an ignoramus.
I do. Not at all. They are talking about a few parts per million.
They run at different frequencies just long enough to accumulate the desired phase difference. They then go back to identical frequencies and run at differing phases for as long as power needs to be sent. The tricky part is that stations C, D, E... are also involved.
And they will stay in sync even if the grid frequency drifts.
BTW there are much better RTCs available than the ones you've been using.
It's Open Source. Anyone who wants to can do that. Debian does.
Believe it or not, the engineers that operate the network actually know what they are doing.
The flow of power between tied AC networks is determined by phase, not voltage. To adjust the phase between your generator and that of a neighbor to whom you wish to send power you must run faster than he for long enough to accumulate the desired phase difference. Such adjustments are going on constantly throughout the network and conflict with the requirement to keep the average frequency at exactly 60Hz. Relaxing the latter requirement will make network operations easier and more reliable.
It's Free Software. Mr. Kaply has everything he needs to start supporting it himself. Think of it as a business opportunity.
The egyptians ate stone-ground flour with a lot of sand in it. It wore their teeth down rapidly, resulting in abscesses.
> We'll be doing full translations a lot sooner [than 2029].
Then we'll have it by 2029, won't we? Which is what he said.
n/t
Let's simplify that: You cannor trust a website to load code.
n/t
And if they are fundamental conceptual problems that cannot be fixed?
> ...the direction it's moving in should be clear.
Yes. The wrong one.
> The reality is that if the browser vendors do this right...
This cannot be done right. It's utter lunacy.
> ...Extinguish...
We can only hope.
n/t
> Germany is not switching to coal...
Putin will be very happy to hear that. He'll sell you the gas you'll need. Of course, there will be a price...
> If the political will is there...
So you are switching to coal after all.
> Don't we all know the Earth is warming up due to human activity ?
In what way does the possibility that the sun may reduce its output in the future contradict that?
The Europeans are going to save us by switching from nukes back to coal.
Or vi if you are of the other religion.
> ...spewing several villages worth of CO2...
It's ok. They buy "carbon offsets".
Or anything, really, except US partisan politics?