Do you have statistics on that? I'm wondering because it seems to me that if you carry a gun with the intent on harming (but not specifically killing) someone, you are more likely to kill them simply by getting 'caught up' in the moment of shooting them with a gun.
I agree, I'm neither totaly against or for a war, but I do believe a war should include more countries than the us and uk. Partly because the us wasn't the only country supporting iraq back then.
The problem also gets worse by the medias inability or unwillingness to report about these issues you talk about.
The peaceniks aren't saying "America bad, Saddam good". They are protesting against the moral corruption going on here and the wrongdoings of the US _and_ other western countries since way back but alot of people seem to have an inability to grasp this.
And the ones to suffer are the civilians of poor countries who cannot defend themselves against rich western countries seeking profit or retaliation.
This message is just another step in my quest to find the correct answer in this crisis:) Too tired now, I'll wait for reply's and continue later.
I'll also take a karma hit, it's non-existant anyway:)
The question is, why is Bush so interested in taking on iraq all of a sudden ? And not 2 or 5 years ago when the people in iraq were also suffering ? Are iraq hiding terrorists ? Not according to what we've been told.
And of course Saddam have or have had weapons of mass-destruction, Bush sr sold them to him ! Well that's what I've heard. How's that for hypocrisy ?
And not speaking up against a war because it might "empower" Saddam must be the most silly reason ever, it's not the "peaceniks" who will pull the triggers.
However I do agree that the people of iraq deserve a better leader than Saddam.
Slashdot Mirror
There is an easy solution to this.
Move to the Google opt-out village: http://www.theonion.com/video/google-opt-out-feature-lets-users-protect-privacy,14358/
Wouldn't changing their names be more effective? I guess it's more fun to sue someone.
Thank God for WikiLeaks.
And religion will tell you that's it ok as long as you use it on people who believe in another God.
Of course, they are too busy (go)ogling porn
I guess the parent is a joke. But it's so bad it's looks like a troll.
Keep your jokes shorter dude. And make sure they are relevant at all. Plz.
It's funny because it's true !
Ok, damn offtopic and you deserve an offtopic mod, but still...
I'm brave enough not to post anonymously.
It's wonderful how you manage to compare the bombing of a few boats to the dropping of an a-bomb on millions of civilians.
Do you have statistics on that?
I'm wondering because it seems to me that if you carry a gun with the intent on harming (but not specifically killing) someone, you are more likely to kill them simply by getting 'caught up' in the moment of shooting them with a gun.
I really hope you don't "hate Islamic nations"
Mod parent up :)
:)
I agree, I'm neither totaly against or for a war, but I do believe a war should include more countries than the us and uk. Partly because the us wasn't the only country supporting iraq back then.
The problem also gets worse by the medias inability or unwillingness to report about these issues you talk about.
The peaceniks aren't saying "America bad, Saddam good". They are protesting against the moral corruption going on here and the wrongdoings of the US _and_ other western countries since way back but alot of people seem to have an inability to grasp this.
And the ones to suffer are the civilians of poor countries who cannot defend themselves against rich western countries seeking profit or retaliation.
This message is just another step in my quest to find the correct answer in this crisis
Too tired now, I'll wait for reply's and continue later.
I'll also take a karma hit, it's non-existant anyway :)
The question is, why is Bush so interested in taking on iraq all of a sudden ? And not 2 or 5 years ago when the people in iraq were also suffering ? Are iraq hiding terrorists ? Not according to what we've been told.
And of course Saddam have or have had weapons of mass-destruction, Bush sr sold them to him ! Well that's what I've heard. How's that for hypocrisy ?
And not speaking up against a war because it might "empower" Saddam must be the most silly reason ever, it's not the "peaceniks" who will pull the triggers.
However I do agree that the people of iraq deserve a better leader than Saddam.
Isn't it possible to just #ifdef all the locks or something ? So they won't get compiled in for uni-kernels.
Don't you remember ? AOL is evil.
They should use MSN. Oh shit.
Ok that yahoo thing then.
And what if the teacher doesn't like my screenname, fuckschool2 ?
"They're providing a service, and people are willing to pay more for that service."
This must be why noone complains about overpriced cd's. People want to pay this much. Sounds logical to me.
....they sing patriotic songs about Saddam. And they are told that iraq is the best country in the world.
Hmm makes you wonder.