The text of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Note that there's nothing about "only for US citizens" in there.
No, the Nordic countries and Germany are *social* democracies, not *socialist* democracies. Their private sectors are far too large to really be socialists. What they have is a mixed market economy that also happens to have a strong social welfare safety net.
I don't think I've ever seen it used for that. It's almost always been used to shut people up, or try to guilt people. Most people crying it that I've had the misfortune of dealing with have no desire to talk about nuances.
The majority of illegal immigrants aren't from Mexico. Many illegal immigrants enter the US through the US-Mexico border, but most are actually from South or Central America.
No, he doesn't have absolute control. He's allowed to deploy troops but needs Congress to approve keeping them there. He also doesn't have unilateral control over the nukes; other people have to also agree to launch them.
That oppression wasn't uniquely felt by blacks, nor was it uniquely perpetrated by whites. The proportion of whites who actually owned slaves was very small, and many poor whites did not benefit from slavery (although they certainly weren't hurt by it as much as the slaves were). Blacks owned slaves in America too, as did Native Americans. Certain groups now lumped in with "white", like the Irish and, to a lesser extent, the Italians, also had long periods of oppression and discrimination. Things still aren't equal, but it's more complex than "white supremacy".
PS. playing the "Muslim" is not a race game is a very week argument. It is at best implying that plain old bigotry is any better than racism.
Arguably, it is better than racism. Still bad, and should be unacceptable in a Presidential candidate, but being prejudiced against someone for something they choose to be (Muslim, Christian, Republican, Democrat, etc.) is somewhat better than being prejudiced against someone for something they can't change (race, gender, sexuality, etc.).
Trump can't be all that stupid. He keeps winning primaries, and nobody is fighting him properly. I'm also not sure Hillary is any less racist than Trump, and probably no less egomaniacal (although better at hiding it).
He seems far more xenophobic than racist. He thinks legal immigration is fine, and doesn't like Muslims all that much (which is really bigoted and bad, but not racist). People are getting pushed to Trump because the left keeps lying about him. Most of the violence at his rallies is started by people protesting him, but the media often just reports "violence at Trump rallies". Some of the farther left sites are actually encouraging people to riot if he shows up. I think he'll be a disaster for America, but Left have themselves to blame for a lot of his popularity.
DLC can be perfectly valid as a game enhancer to a finished game. Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age: Inquisition both did it well overall, in my opinion. The main storylines were good, there were plenty of sidequests in the main game, and I really liked them both. They released DLC that let you play the main character in additional events after the main quest was finished; the original game was still certainly complete, but this was a nice bonus.
Not really true. The US (or a larger coalition) could stop NK, but lacks the will to commit to that. It would certainly be easier to do with China's help, but unless China full-on counterinvades like they did in the Korean War, a coalition could do it regardless of how China feels.
I mean, technically the AC is right. In the article you linked, David Duke even says:
In fact, I haven’t formally endorsed him.
Of course, he then does go on to say he supports Trump at this point. Then again, he isn't in charge of the KKK any more either.
To be clear: I don't support Trump, and I think he would be a disaster for America. But let's attack him for what he says and does, not who supports him.
Bombing the crap out of them would probably result in Seoul being destroyed, since NK has lots of conventional artillery within range of the SK capital. That's a pretty big deterrent.
It's fairly clear that the author was referring to MPs who voted for it. They are the ones who fear not enough has been done to safeguard individuals' privacy.
Slashdot Mirror
The text of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Note that there's nothing about "only for US citizens" in there.
and 7 Billion people who consider the US no more trustworthy than North Korea.
Well, that's just laughable.
Ha, that's a good one. When the EU gets rids of hate speech laws, then you can say that.
And Germany was only reunified less than 30 years ago. That hardly means Germany has no culture.
No, the Nordic countries and Germany are *social* democracies, not *socialist* democracies. Their private sectors are far too large to really be socialists. What they have is a mixed market economy that also happens to have a strong social welfare safety net.
I don't think I've ever seen it used for that. It's almost always been used to shut people up, or try to guilt people. Most people crying it that I've had the misfortune of dealing with have no desire to talk about nuances.
The majority of illegal immigrants aren't from Mexico. Many illegal immigrants enter the US through the US-Mexico border, but most are actually from South or Central America.
No, he doesn't have absolute control. He's allowed to deploy troops but needs Congress to approve keeping them there. He also doesn't have unilateral control over the nukes; other people have to also agree to launch them.
The claim in the GP was "all Mexicans", not Mexican immigrants.
When you're referencing all Mexicans and call them murderers and rapists and some, you assume, are good people... You're a racist.
Not what he said. He was referring to the illegal immigrants. What Trump says is bad enough on its own, why lie?
I swear, KKK titles sound like someone opened a D&D Monster Manual to random pages and added some adjectives.
That oppression wasn't uniquely felt by blacks, nor was it uniquely perpetrated by whites. The proportion of whites who actually owned slaves was very small, and many poor whites did not benefit from slavery (although they certainly weren't hurt by it as much as the slaves were). Blacks owned slaves in America too, as did Native Americans. Certain groups now lumped in with "white", like the Irish and, to a lesser extent, the Italians, also had long periods of oppression and discrimination. Things still aren't equal, but it's more complex than "white supremacy".
How is that relevant? Whether a statement is racist or not does not depend on whether you're running for office.
PS. playing the "Muslim" is not a race game is a very week argument. It is at best implying that plain old bigotry is any better than racism.
Arguably, it is better than racism. Still bad, and should be unacceptable in a Presidential candidate, but being prejudiced against someone for something they choose to be (Muslim, Christian, Republican, Democrat, etc.) is somewhat better than being prejudiced against someone for something they can't change (race, gender, sexuality, etc.).
FYI, David Duke didn't officially endorse Trump, he just said he supports Trump for now.
Trump can't be all that stupid. He keeps winning primaries, and nobody is fighting him properly. I'm also not sure Hillary is any less racist than Trump, and probably no less egomaniacal (although better at hiding it).
He seems far more xenophobic than racist. He thinks legal immigration is fine, and doesn't like Muslims all that much (which is really bigoted and bad, but not racist). People are getting pushed to Trump because the left keeps lying about him. Most of the violence at his rallies is started by people protesting him, but the media often just reports "violence at Trump rallies". Some of the farther left sites are actually encouraging people to riot if he shows up. I think he'll be a disaster for America, but Left have themselves to blame for a lot of his popularity.
In a tolerant society, you are required to tolerate the views of anyone, even racists, but you do not have to tolerate their actions.
DLC can be perfectly valid as a game enhancer to a finished game. Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age: Inquisition both did it well overall, in my opinion. The main storylines were good, there were plenty of sidequests in the main game, and I really liked them both. They released DLC that let you play the main character in additional events after the main quest was finished; the original game was still certainly complete, but this was a nice bonus.
Not really true. The US (or a larger coalition) could stop NK, but lacks the will to commit to that. It would certainly be easier to do with China's help, but unless China full-on counterinvades like they did in the Korean War, a coalition could do it regardless of how China feels.
In fact, I haven’t formally endorsed him.
Of course, he then does go on to say he supports Trump at this point. Then again, he isn't in charge of the KKK any more either.
To be clear: I don't support Trump, and I think he would be a disaster for America. But let's attack him for what he says and does, not who supports him.
Bombing the crap out of them would probably result in Seoul being destroyed, since NK has lots of conventional artillery within range of the SK capital. That's a pretty big deterrent.
It's fairly clear that the author was referring to MPs who voted for it. They are the ones who fear not enough has been done to safeguard individuals' privacy.
It is if Ford suddenly decides to update the computer controlling the engine, shutting it down in the middle of your attempted escape.
If they're already on a slow, expensive connection, changing the OS probably does have a cost. You still have to download it, after all.