I have no issue with fission power if appropriate safeguards are on there - e.g. unlike Fukushima if your power station is on the coast do NOT put the backup generators in a basement, put them in the containment building.
No. What I'm saying is the tobacco taxes - or rather, the tobacco settlement that was in the hundreds of billions - was supposed to go to treating smoking related diseases, smoking cessession programs, etc. And none of it did - it went to golf courses, playgrounds, and other 'slush' things. Any implementation of a carbon tax will do that too - and income and sales and excise taxes will not go down.
All of these things ARE true. Unfortunately, given the amount of self and USA hating that the left shows every time they open their mouths, you might realize why the Right is so skeptical of anything the Left says.
I'm a right winger AND an engineer. I want sustainable power because, duh, it is sustainable. I'm also an avoid outdoorsman and I like unspoiled nature.
But what does the left want to do with the outdoors? Why, keep people (except the uber wealthy) off of it. So voting dumbocrat doesn't help me, either.
What ? Yes, if Britain hadn't stood up through the Battle of Britain, it is true, the job would have been harder - but without the resources and people of the US, WWII would have ended very, very differently.
The USSR troops drove to Berlin in vehicles from Detroit.
What's truly amazing is that Britain was able to hold out by herself as long as she did, but of course, the Empire provided A LOT of resources.
As for the USSR, it imploded trying to keep up with US military spending. Would it have done so anyway? Or become a water empire?
The news media says the same thing about every Republican President - which is no surprise, since they're so left wing it makes Stalin look like a right winger.
Long before the current train crash - like during the Klinton train crash - I realized that almost nothing coming out of so-called 'news' was true. . It is a tragedy but unfortunately there is nothing I can do about it.
In general, governments are NOT good conservors of resources - other than designating national parks. Simply giving a government more money through taxes is like giving a heroin addict more drugs and telling him to reform.
Slashdot Mirror
I have no issue with fission power if appropriate safeguards are on there - e.g. unlike Fukushima if your power station is on the coast do NOT put the backup generators in a basement, put them in the containment building.
You meant the public water system in Flint? I'd say public is also the same as oligarchization, unfortunately.
No, I say that people in government are unable to do it. Whether or not they are human is up for debate.
No. What I'm saying is the tobacco taxes - or rather, the tobacco settlement that was in the hundreds of billions - was supposed to go to treating smoking related diseases, smoking cessession programs, etc. And none of it did - it went to golf courses, playgrounds, and other 'slush' things. Any implementation of a carbon tax will do that too - and income and sales and excise taxes will not go down.
Rather like the blue states are an embarassment to the rest of us people here, yes.
Presumably this is sarcasm.
No. He wanted money from the 'climate fund' he doesn't give a rats.
Actually we're doing better than a lot of Europe at the moment. Presently we're doing better than Germany https://www.electricitymap.org...
And of course, how many people stay alive due to electric power?
All of these things ARE true. Unfortunately, given the amount of self and USA hating that the left shows every time they open their mouths, you might realize why the Right is so skeptical of anything the Left says. I'm a right winger AND an engineer. I want sustainable power because, duh, it is sustainable. I'm also an avoid outdoorsman and I like unspoiled nature. But what does the left want to do with the outdoors? Why, keep people (except the uber wealthy) off of it. So voting dumbocrat doesn't help me, either.
Which of course, will not happen. Look at the tobacco money - almost NONE of it was used for healthcare etc. In fact, maybe none of it was.
Actually it's a proportional outcome in the election, based on population. And it has worked quite well, and will continue to do so.
You're violating the meme that the Democrats are the poor underdogs. Never mind they're richer than the Republicans.
I cannot speak on this. But Trump DID actually campaign eveywhere - including Wyoming, which was a R lockup .
I'd say she thinks that about 60% of the population is deplorable.
Hear, hear.
Actually it started under Bush, though not as organized. The 'libertarian wing' hates the 'business as usual' Republicans as much as Democrats.
What ? Yes, if Britain hadn't stood up through the Battle of Britain, it is true, the job would have been harder - but without the resources and people of the US, WWII would have ended very, very differently. The USSR troops drove to Berlin in vehicles from Detroit. What's truly amazing is that Britain was able to hold out by herself as long as she did, but of course, the Empire provided A LOT of resources. As for the USSR, it imploded trying to keep up with US military spending. Would it have done so anyway? Or become a water empire?
Such as Obama bowing to the Saudi King?
The news media says the same thing about every Republican President - which is no surprise, since they're so left wing it makes Stalin look like a right winger. Long before the current train crash - like during the Klinton train crash - I realized that almost nothing coming out of so-called 'news' was true. . It is a tragedy but unfortunately there is nothing I can do about it.
In general, governments are NOT good conservors of resources - other than designating national parks. Simply giving a government more money through taxes is like giving a heroin addict more drugs and telling him to reform.
Yeah - thanks, but, no thanks. I really don't need to give personal health information to...who?
It won't change then, either.
So making people poor is better than finding real solutions. Nice! How about taxing yourself 99%?
You mean like Obama expanding illegal surveillance on the populace? Expanding drone strikes? Interesting what you imply is 'good' v 'bad.'