a) we don't know what krebs paid akamai to do beyond content accelraiton at the edge
b) we don;t know why akamai kicked off krebs (he did'nt pay for ddos protection? the akamai firewall?)
c) there's no such thing as bad publicity
a judge said that, not me. I had a lawyer student do the survey of cases. it varies by jurisdiction. it's unsettled law at best. liberal judges who don't know about yes and no, only shades of gray when it comes to technology.
in the same way the accuser (in this case the gov't) has to give the accused all that they have against him. that's the way our system works. two-way. in some jurisdictions an officer has to see the offending material that is subsequently encrypted in order to show probable cause. I did not read the whole case to see what they are using as probable cause.
you misunderstand me completely. I did not say I agreed with that, only that was how it was today. that's why he's in jail. instead of arguing with me you should vote for members who will change the laws. I likely have way more court experience then you'll ever have.
no, it's narrower than that. under our system you can't utter or sign. but you have to give the other side (in this case the gov't) the unencrypted data.
Slashdot Mirror
what about paper over-voting for clinton? without a double blind we don't know jack.
starbucks french roast, ground fine, filtered water, slow brewing. yammv.
no, certain dns servers did not work, others did. i was never down and i live and work in dc. the popular press reported it incorrectly.
huh? the us internet did not go down. or did you read that on facebook?
not my job to educate them - start at parenting, move to schools. if idiots listen to any story anywhere without validating it then that's their loss.
same thing
anyone who uses facebook agrees to this. look at your eula when you sign up. doh.
how do you think google and facebook make money?
only $89....
just delete the cookies to get around the paywall...
by the way, that's how twitter analysis on different languages, for one example, is done.
technically it's an eigenvector, journalists don't get that kind of training or exposure...
i would pay akamai to kick off freeloaders so i'm protected. win-win for me. not so much for krebs.
who said thy were blocking him?
acceleration
a) we don't know what krebs paid akamai to do beyond content accelraiton at the edge b) we don;t know why akamai kicked off krebs (he did'nt pay for ddos protection? the akamai firewall?) c) there's no such thing as bad publicity
new domains would be limited or stopped, existing domains would work just fine. bruce should crawl back in his hole.
lofgren that is
right, it's unsettled law. a judge can follow this or not.
right, it's unsettled, just what I said.
he could put a pencil in his mouth and type one character at a time...
a judge said that, not me. I had a lawyer student do the survey of cases. it varies by jurisdiction. it's unsettled law at best. liberal judges who don't know about yes and no, only shades of gray when it comes to technology.
in the same way the accuser (in this case the gov't) has to give the accused all that they have against him. that's the way our system works. two-way. in some jurisdictions an officer has to see the offending material that is subsequently encrypted in order to show probable cause. I did not read the whole case to see what they are using as probable cause.
you misunderstand me completely. I did not say I agreed with that, only that was how it was today. that's why he's in jail. instead of arguing with me you should vote for members who will change the laws. I likely have way more court experience then you'll ever have.
no, it's narrower than that. under our system you can't utter or sign. but you have to give the other side (in this case the gov't) the unencrypted data.