for: making and editing videos (like with screenflow and others), doing cad (like with autocad and others), doing reverse engineering (like with IDA PRO and others), the list goes on...no tablet does that...and never will...
no it does not depend on government regulation. it reduces fraud. it's competitive. go away government. we need smarter consumers. we need people to stop saying "...it's beyond me..." well then get someone smart!
in the airline business there's huge government safety overhead because lots of people die otherwise. in iot they don't die. we don't need standards. we need smarter consumers. buy junk, get junk. doh.
homeowner's insurance companies are uniquely positioned to fix this quickly. i get significant discounts from usaa for things like burglar alarms, fire improvements, etc. they can just extend them to iot security. government is not needed or wanted.
precisely - now we get the rash of oops - our benchmark was the result of cheating...we'll find the name of the engineer who was responsible...and force him to use our phone...
Slashdot Mirror
it goes up...
...wow...just wow...
as does any site that lets scripts be injected...some heads aught to roll over this...
+1
too bad we live in a democracy not an autocracy...you can't order people around...good or bad in the long term, but it's what we have...
cost
...where everyone is a fruit, a nut, or a flake...
one set of bluetooth headphones you use for every device..what's wrong with that? doh.
for: making and editing videos (like with screenflow and others), doing cad (like with autocad and others), doing reverse engineering (like with IDA PRO and others), the list goes on...no tablet does that...and never will...
they're just not distributed...
domo arigato
if i'm not mistaken there's more fb users outside the us then there ere are us citizens...
yeah, it was poorly worded - i think what they meant to say was it was not a sprawling one story farm...
not really - they're already preparing
btw - what was PCI DSS called before it was PCI DSS and who came up with that? hint, it pre-dated any law
who do you think pays for shrinkage? the consumer, always has, always will.
+1 and a good laugh!
yeah, bruce is definitely a moron on this (and most things come to think of it) - he may know applied math (cryptography) but not much else.
no it does not depend on government regulation. it reduces fraud. it's competitive. go away government. we need smarter consumers. we need people to stop saying "...it's beyond me..." well then get someone smart!
in the airline business there's huge government safety overhead because lots of people die otherwise. in iot they don't die. we don't need standards. we need smarter consumers. buy junk, get junk. doh.
homeowner's insurance companies are uniquely positioned to fix this quickly. i get significant discounts from usaa for things like burglar alarms, fire improvements, etc. they can just extend them to iot security. government is not needed or wanted.
precisely - now we get the rash of oops - our benchmark was the result of cheating...we'll find the name of the engineer who was responsible...and force him to use our phone...
as long as the cost of this does not exceed shrinkage (or whatever they call waste, fraud and abuse in the airlines, etc.) it will keep happening
precisely - don't like the free service, use another, no one is forcing you
big difference - ms charged, the others don't...what does gmail cost to you? zilcho.