I am no fan of Obama, but "income gap" is a useless and purely rhetorical metric.
If you are concerned with "the poor", you need to look at mass average measurements of wealth and health. These tend to skyrocket in economically free areas, and suffer in non-free ones, whether hat be because of a failed state, a dictatorship, a corrupt state with kickbacks everywhere, or a heavily-taced one.
Currently, said average wealth of poor ***is*** skyrocketting -- in China and India and similar.
This is one argument I cannot agree with. It would decrease peanut butter demands, which would filter throgh the entire peanut butter market. I can't imagine much, are people just guessing this is a reason?
One person gets sick and dies, there goes your "worth $2.6 million".
Not five articles away, slashdotters are bitching over GM making a decision to risk lives for profit. Here, they bitch about not risking it. Or not risking money to help poor, or some damned thing.
Where's that pill Stan took last night? I need it when browsing slashdot.
The heathens in Europe don't know what a peanut butter and jelly sandwich is. When living there, I wanted to make one, and the only peanit butter I could find was for cooking.
No sugar and salt is completely gross, dude. Thou knowest not of which thou speaketherino.
Still waiting for a diagnosis of the feeling of superiority concrete canyon dwellers get, when studies show too many rats in a cage they start eating each other. At least they don't vote, telling field mice how to live.
Yes. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled freedom of speech includes the right not to say something.
It still comes up, most recently in a current case where airlines are complaining about font sizes in government-mandated costs -- they want to call out government costs in giant numbers, but government mandates require some other number pleasing to politicians to be the largest.
As China is sovereign, they cannot be brought to bear in anyone's court.
If you seek to penalize companies or people that kowtow to same, that is the job of the president and Congress, not the courts, via diplomacy or military.
Our general policy for 50 years has been encouraging economic (and other) freedoms. Is it working? What are alternatives?
Will I go to shut down my phone and be greeted with a popup that "Cannot quit Excel now"?
Will I thumb-whip an Excel spreadsheet to scroll down, and be greeted with a popup saying, "Insufficient resources to display", accompanied by a screen that no longer redraws?
Well I can hardly blame them in this case as it was over gay rights.
Mundane politic issues, sure, don't be a fussbudget, but not ones of existence.
However, Mozilla would be in the right, legally, to fire these guys -- publicly associating yourself with a company and making loud political statements is not your purview. No, you don't get to do that. You get to do that only without associating yourself with (someone else's stuff).
At the same time, good luck doing that as the PR backlash would be tremendous. So they are in practice safe. Probably.
We do embedded development. This means re-qualifying a whole new version of tools, and the tools frequently don't work right and you cannot "just upgrade" because these are in the millions of recallable units.
It's all seconds, or fractions of a second to your heart's desire, for calculations and deltas.
The rest is human-usable representation, a "pretty print". Making the pretty print be more useful to computers rather than people is less than helpful.
The tech companies are good, but the government? Local police?
There is currently a story out about 800 government employees working in a hole. All they do is manually process new federal employee retirement papers, sans any computer automation. Kind of scary processing retirement papers counts as a medium-sized business (> 400 employees).
See, "evil giant corp", by the way, let's limit the amount any one corp can donate. Wut? Each dealer counts as a corp so we can get more from them? Gosh, what a coincidence.
Didn't people see that report about seven different agencies having a finger in the regulation of gas cans? When seven dofferent committees got done, the thing wouldn't fit in the gas can holder on vehicles, so people just threw it in back.
Slashdot Mirror
STEM != computer programmer
It's been pointed out these people are holding the same position President Obama did until about a year or so ago.
Hehe, 3 or 4 fish hooked! Reel 'em in, rossdee!
I am no fan of Obama, but "income gap" is a useless and purely rhetorical metric.
If you are concerned with "the poor", you need to look at mass average measurements of wealth and health. These tend to skyrocket in economically free areas, and suffer in non-free ones, whether hat be because of a failed state, a dictatorship, a corrupt state with kickbacks everywhere, or a heavily-taced one.
Currently, said average wealth of poor ***is*** skyrocketting -- in China and India and similar.
The reasons you list are meme cover stories -- some valid, some not.
None of it has anything to do with limiting the number of taxi drivers instead of letting them compete.
In a free country, no, you don't, in fact, get to use government to carve up my access to product and limit it to whoever has the ear of a politician.
This is one argument I cannot agree with. It would decrease peanut butter demands, which would filter throgh the entire peanut butter market. I can't imagine much, are people just guessing this is a reason?
One person gets sick and dies, there goes your "worth $2.6 million".
Not five articles away, slashdotters are bitching over GM making a decision to risk lives for profit. Here, they bitch about not risking it. Or not risking money to help poor, or some damned thing.
Where's that pill Stan took last night? I need it when browsing slashdot.
The half-size one. No, wait. The full one.
> and sugar
The heathens in Europe don't know what a peanut butter and jelly sandwich is. When living there, I wanted to make one, and the only peanit butter I could find was for cooking.
No sugar and salt is completely gross, dude. Thou knowest not of which thou speaketherino.
Still waiting for a diagnosis of the feeling of superiority concrete canyon dwellers get, when studies show too many rats in a cage they start eating each other. At least they don't vote, telling field mice how to live.
Yes. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled freedom of speech includes the right not to say something.
It still comes up, most recently in a current case where airlines are complaining about font sizes in government-mandated costs -- they want to call out government costs in giant numbers, but government mandates require some other number pleasing to politicians to be the largest.
1 person? Maybe this just shows the incredible accuracy with which the government determines these things!
(Looks at human history briefly.). No. No...hehehe no.
There's always something for lawyers to scream about, when searching to line their pockets.
As China is sovereign, they cannot be brought to bear in anyone's court.
If you seek to penalize companies or people that kowtow to same, that is the job of the president and Congress, not the courts, via diplomacy or military.
Our general policy for 50 years has been encouraging economic (and other) freedoms. Is it working? What are alternatives?
There. That's much better than a rib.
"Not in my backyard!" squealeth the rich in Hollywood and Martha's Vinypard.
I wonder how porty the ports are.
Will I go to shut down my phone and be greeted with a popup that "Cannot quit Excel now"?
Will I thumb-whip an Excel spreadsheet to scroll down, and be greeted with a popup saying, "Insufficient resources to display", accompanied by a screen that no longer redraws?
These are both still features of 2010.
Well I can hardly blame them in this case as it was over gay rights.
Mundane politic issues, sure, don't be a fussbudget, but not ones of existence.
However, Mozilla would be in the right, legally, to fire these guys -- publicly associating yourself with a company and making loud political statements is not your purview. No, you don't get to do that. You get to do that only without associating yourself with (someone else's stuff).
At the same time, good luck doing that as the PR backlash would be tremendous. So they are in practice safe. Probably.
We do embedded development. This means re-qualifying a whole new version of tools, and the tools frequently don't work right and you cannot "just upgrade" because these are in the millions of recallable units.
It's all seconds, or fractions of a second to your heart's desire, for calculations and deltas.
The rest is human-usable representation, a "pretty print". Making the pretty print be more useful to computers rather than people is less than helpful.
> Btrfs
tl;dr, I assume this is a button to let you tag people as a butterface?
The tech companies are good, but the government? Local police?
There is currently a story out about 800 government employees working in a hole. All they do is manually process new federal employee retirement papers, sans any computer automation. Kind of scary processing retirement papers counts as a medium-sized business (> 400 employees).
Troll, hehe. was my description inaccurate?
See, "evil giant corp", by the way, let's limit the amount any one corp can donate. Wut? Each dealer counts as a corp so we can get more from them? Gosh, what a coincidence.
Didn't people see that report about seven different agencies having a finger in the regulation of gas cans? When seven dofferent committees got done, the thing wouldn't fit in the gas can holder on vehicles, so people just threw it in back.
> The summary said she gave them her password. That sounds like permission.
With a Sheriff right there looking over her shoulder? Sounds like permission in the same way Crimea gave Russia permission.
Decent sp agencies try to avoid detection. This means not keeping the letters you illegally open.
I would be shocked if they didn't already habe machines to brute scan without opening.