Dude. Your position is like saying, in 1890 before Ford started mass production, that cheap cars are on the near horizon, so best get to bannning horses.
It would be 50+ years before well-off middle class could afford cars. Poor struggle still today.
Anyone who does math can tell you that with a 1% annual growth, there will be more humans than particles in the universe, in 17,000 years or something.
But we do know command and control of the economy is the wrong way to go, and in any case wouldn't be warranted, even if so, for thousands of years.
Every time a politician wants to control something, think to yourself what is the kickback potential to get back out of the way? That is the way of the world.
It's the number of complete 90 minute sleep cycles! Cruddy protein folds get repaired. Brain processes and problem-solves the day's events via dreaming. Boners get exercised. (No, it isn't having to pee in the morning, its happening to wake up, having to pee, during this period.)
Obesity (apnea), type II diabetes (excess sugar needing to pee, and neuropathy pain) all cut into this until you are lucky to get one full cycle.
Isn't Spain in the EU? How the hell is this allowed to happen?
I mean, Brussels has so little to do they can micromanage the length of carrots and the yellowness of bananas. Clearly they must have the big stuff like free speech guaranteed everywhere.
Talk about politics and politicians should be the most highly-protected of all. In the US even flat-out lies are protected as the government may not become the arbiter of truth about itself.
I wonder if there's a secret undersea war. The US should build a little machine to regularly go up and down these cables, and cut free anything that's on it that doesn't belong.
I'm sure the major powers have tapped everything, as well as placed little bombs hidden somewhere along those thousands of miles, for every undersea cable, ready to go in case of a war.
As with anything cool and complex, the angry men ready to destroy it are prepared, to preserve their power.
As your "papers", safe and secure inside your house, move online, you do indeed maintain the expectation of privacy you did in your home. And in any case, your papers are separate from your home in the expectation of privacy.
The Founding Fathers couldn't have foreseen computers tracking everybody in a dozen different ways, from cell phones to license plate recognition to face recognition to cameras on every corner, all being fed into a machine panopticon for the government to watch you. The days when "well, you have no expectation of privacy" in data handed to a corporation need to come to an end.
There is a dutch phrase which is "unity sausage" which basically translated to a bad post-ww2 sausage, all the NSA crap the US has been pushing is exactly THAT...
Tobacco companies don't want to harm ecigarettes because they cut into their profit. They produce ecigarettes and want to ladle on expensive regulations so only they can afford to produce them, and take the profits themselves.
Slashdot Mirror
I guess it is about the size of the cost than physical size.
"Look at the size of my virtue signalling!"
Dude. Your position is like saying, in 1890 before Ford started mass production, that cheap cars are on the near horizon, so best get to bannning horses.
It would be 50+ years before well-off middle class could afford cars. Poor struggle still today.
The Nazis in Germany gained ascendancy at least in part because they could bear up and silence those who spoke against them.
It is foolish to grant that power to the anti-Nazi side, then cross one's fingers and hope it eventually twisted against one's interests.
It is odd to feign smugness that you've, once and for all, seized censorshop to be used by the proper people, and only them.
You still have people alive who have memory of dictatorship. Meanwhile, the US remains free almost 250 years later.
From the responses to you, your troll was fairly productive.
LeoDicaprioRaisingAGlassWithFireworksBehindHim.gif
Does it stop the popups Chrome seems incomoetent to stamp out? *
* I assume it is a loophole in a Java spec or similar that cannot be ended without violating the spec. Here's a hint: VIOLATE IT!!!
This is true. It is about censorship so they can root through it. Keep that in mind, every other country, when your laws demand the same thing.
Anyone who does math can tell you that with a 1% annual growth, there will be more humans than particles in the universe, in 17,000 years or something.
But we do know command and control of the economy is the wrong way to go, and in any case wouldn't be warranted, even if so, for thousands of years.
Every time a politician wants to control something, think to yourself what is the kickback potential to get back out of the way? That is the way of the world.
Oh, and stress worrying!
It's the number of complete 90 minute sleep cycles! Cruddy protein folds get repaired. Brain processes and problem-solves the day's events via dreaming. Boners get exercised. (No, it isn't having to pee in the morning, its happening to wake up, having to pee, during this period.)
Obesity (apnea), type II diabetes (excess sugar needing to pee, and neuropathy pain) all cut into this until you are lucky to get one full cycle.
Isn't Spain in the EU? How the hell is this allowed to happen?
I mean, Brussels has so little to do they can micromanage the length of carrots and the yellowness of bananas. Clearly they must have the big stuff like free speech guaranteed everywhere.
Talk about politics and politicians should be the most highly-protected of all. In the US even flat-out lies are protected as the government may not become the arbiter of truth about itself.
"After observing your usage statistics, an hour is way too long. I am now charging by the second, one minute minimum."
That's what she said!
I wonder if there's a secret undersea war. The US should build a little machine to regularly go up and down these cables, and cut free anything that's on it that doesn't belong.
I'm sure the major powers have tapped everything, as well as placed little bombs hidden somewhere along those thousands of miles, for every undersea cable, ready to go in case of a war.
As with anything cool and complex, the angry men ready to destroy it are prepared, to preserve their power.
Did they build gigantic multi-billion dollar headquarters, or did the construction companies they hired?
So in a freer, open market, you made a wise consumer choice, according to your own standards.
Sounds like the free market working as intended.
As your "papers", safe and secure inside your house, move online, you do indeed maintain the expectation of privacy you did in your home. And in any case, your papers are separate from your home in the expectation of privacy.
The Founding Fathers couldn't have foreseen computers tracking everybody in a dozen different ways, from cell phones to license plate recognition to face recognition to cameras on every corner, all being fed into a machine panopticon for the government to watch you. The days when "well, you have no expectation of privacy" in data handed to a corporation need to come to an end.
There is a dutch phrase which is "unity sausage" which basically translated to a bad post-ww2 sausage, all the NSA crap the US has been pushing is exactly THAT...
And what does that translate to?
There's a 23.6% chance this comment was by a Russian paid astroturfer. Which, of course, is what this is all about.
There are craploads of examples of dangerous driving harming people.
A court is a public arena where grievances are hauled out for airing, in the public.
So, what is the harm? We need real examples of actual harm, not theoretical ones. You can't sue over imagined harms.
Ben Kenobi: ...so you can see it was cleaning them...from a certain point of view.
All posts downstream of the whoosh comment are invalid fruit of a poisoned tree 4th Amendment violation.
Whoosh!
Possibly, but not for the reasons you think.
Tobacco companies don't want to harm ecigarettes because they cut into their profit. They produce ecigarettes and want to ladle on expensive regulations so only they can afford to produce them, and take the profits themselves.
Don't you NPR very much?