Slashdot Mirror


User: whipslash

whipslash's activity in the archive.

Stories
29
Comments
840
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 840

  1. Re: BeauHD on Best Way To Mine Bitcoins - Allow Errors! · · Score: 1

    Nobody's turning this site into another gadget site

  2. Re:Yeaaa on Preserving Cuba's Classic Cars (hackaday.com) · · Score: 1

    I very much enjoyed this story

  3. Re:Sorry Assholes on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Because ad networks typically have at least a *modicum* of filters which would filter out spam. They don't allow advertisers of adult content. However, a download button can be considered non-deceptive if the download button does not look like our download button, and has the name and brand of the product you are actually downloading on the ad. You see these all over the internet and many times they are very clear. Let me be clear though, we will address these things we just need a bit longer to do it.

  4. Re:Hey, whiplash, can we not have diversity storie on Brown CS Department Hiring Student Diversity, Inclusion Advocates · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the support. The comment limit for excellent karma needs to be changed/eliminated. I'll take a look.

  5. Re:Hey, whiplash, can we not have diversity storie on Brown CS Department Hiring Student Diversity, Inclusion Advocates · · Score: 1

    For the record, I think this news is fine.

  6. Re:fallacy on US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Has Died (theguardian.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Modern civilization overall is dumber, and more diseased than it has ever been.

    Can we get a source?

  7. Re:Sorry Assholes on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    No, we do not give ad networks control over content on our page. And yes you can call it tricking the user or looking native, but the fact is we are not placing those ads. There are thousands of advertisers trying to get these ads on our pages through Google AdX and other networks, and I said we would clamp down. It will be taken care of ASAP. No advertiser will be able to copy a reporting feature but you can keep bitching and moaning about the actions of the previous owners if you would like.

  8. Re:Bet: Did robots or humans edit this article? on Would You Bet Against Sex Robots? AI 'Could Leave Half Of World Unemployed' · · Score: 1

    Fixed. New overlords still getting a handle on no unicode support. We'll support it soon though

  9. Re:Hey, whiplash, can we not have diversity storie on Brown CS Department Hiring Student Diversity, Inclusion Advocates · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's "whipslash". Slash, like Slashdot. Get it? Just playing. Your concern will be taken into account.

  10. Yeah I'm aware. No place I'd rather spend my Saturday

  11. Fair enough.

  12. There was a link but it wasn't showing on mobile. Now it is. Everyone remain calm on this fine Saturday

  13. Re:Link doesn't show on mobile on Potentially Deadly Drug Interactions Found Mining FDA Complaint Bin (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 1

    It's in there now

  14. Coming right up

  15. Re:Sorry Assholes on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Do you realize that Google AdX is serving most of these buttons? We are playing whack-a-mole at the moment trying to discover them all but anyone with an adsense account can push these buttons onto our site. Most advertisers try to make their Adsense ads look native by making them look like the site they are on. Since ours is a download site, its natural for them to try to make them look like download buttons. We're rolling out a feature soon where users can easily report the ads and we can take quick action and blacklist the ad (or advertiser).

  16. Re: Too late on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Yes we are contacting them. We're also going to roll out a feature where users can report the ad directly to us and we can take immediate action on it. There is a report system in place now but its buried.

  17. Re: Then pay up on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Yes we will. We are in the process of examining it all in full.

  18. Re:Isn't this a bit disingenuous... on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    You're very welcome!

  19. Re:Too late on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Yes we will try. We'd love for you to bring yours back too

  20. Re: i do like a clean gravesite... on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Yes I agree :)

  21. Re:Too late on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    I hope so too

  22. Re: Too late on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    If you browse through SourceForge you will see there is plenty of controversial content

  23. Re:Great! Where do I send money? on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Ok we will

  24. Re:Now if you would just bring Fresh Meat back on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    There'd be a lot of groundwork to bring back Freecode/Freshmeat but we are looking into it. I am not sure about the 5 minutes between posts. I'll look into that too

  25. Re:Great! Where do I send money? on SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net) · · Score: 1

    Yes we will definitely look at fixing it