yes, they operate out of the nearby country of thighland, in the city of bangcock
Re:Kevin Bacon has played many roles in his career
on
X-Men: First Class
·
· Score: 1
wow
halle berry hate above and beyond expected nerd parameters
readjusting nerd proximator settings
Re:Kevin Bacon has played many roles in his career
on
X-Men: First Class
·
· Score: 2
whoosh whoosh
Re:Kevin Bacon has played many roles in his career
on
X-Men: First Class
·
· Score: 1
Hey, asshole: she's an academy award winner. Meaning: she's a pretty face, plus a lot more. If you place her mentally in the same category as Pam Anderson, you're the idiot.
I await your lecture as to why her academy award for best actress has no meaning.
So sayeth an anonymous coward on the Internet, signifying nothing.
Kevin Bacon has played many roles in his career
on
X-Men: First Class
·
· Score: 1
but this movie proved to me that, above all else, Kevin Bacon is really good at playing assholes in the movies
plus I liked the brief cameos: the Hugh Jackman F-bomb scene and the Rebecca Romijn Mystique reprise. But where the fuck was Storm? Halle Berry couldn't be bothered or they didn't offer her enough $ for a brief appearance?
and even more importantly, how does this magic element relate to mining operations on pandora, and is it the stuff that makes 10 foot tall blue chicks hot?
Why do people pay so much attention to her? Her coverage is way out of proportion to her actual influence. Ignore Sarah Palin. If she polls highly, then go and cover her, but look:
How much coverage is Giuliani or Romney getting? Paul or Cain? In proportion to Palin? Why is this also-ran attracting the same media attention as if Queen Elizabeth and the reanimated corpse of Michael Jackson and Xenu toured East Coast tourist spots?
It's bizarre. Palin is an also-ran. Please try to ignore this media virus.
are you a well-crafted troll, or a genuine fucktard?
i'm to blame for idiots believing what idiots believe? or forget about me: you are saying that anyone with knowledge is to blame for what the hordes of ignorants believe?
is that your thesis? is that an actual belief of yours or are you sir a well-crafted troll who got me to bite?
i can't believe anyone is that genuinely fucking retarded, you have to be a troll. for the sake of humanity, i hope you are a troll
who is to blame for the ignorance of those who can't be bothered to find easily discovered truth?
i'll tell you who is to blame: THE IGNORANTS THEMSELVES
"That story is about a paper recently released which claims to prove something that for a long time had been generally assumed to be true."
ok, so why don't you involve yourself with the Collatz conjecture and stay out of this story, because this story is actually
"story is about a wikileak recently released which repeats facts that have been known for a long time, but trumpeted in such a way as to be an amazing discovery"
there is bringing out all the facts, then there is a headline that points to one factoid in the events that implies, years later, that the massacre didn't happen
"If you knew this to not be true, yet let it remain generally believed, then it is you to blame"
interesting. i am to blame what hordes of idiots believe, who couldn't care to know what actually happened
that's quite a burden i bear. but i'm glad you see i have this power. let me start by waving my magic wand and getting creationists to believe in evolution, and truthers to believe osama bin laden bought down the world trade center, and birthers to believe barack obama is a christian who was born in hawaii
hey, i don't think i have this power to dispel what idiots believe. you do
It's funny that you put "shocking discovery" in quotes a few times, as though anybody here (or in the news article, or in the cables) was claiming that it's a "shocking discovery". Looks like it's just you.
then why post the story at all? what is the reason for putting this on the front page of slashdot on june 5, 2011?
i don't see evil at work hear. i see stupidity. "omg, look what they found in wikileaks!" (and what they found is mundane)
there was no bloodshed inside the square, the bloodshed happened around the square. but it's called the tiananmen square massacre, because that was the focal point of the conflict. duh
furthermore, there never was any contention about what happened and where. this "shocking discovery" is mundane fact universally understood and agreed upon by anyone who has seriously looked at the massacre, or actually been there
so to post this cable, as if it is shocking to discover that which has always been known, has the appearance of a cover up or a smear against china, in the eyes of your average idiot reading this post who's knows nothing about tiananmen square
so why post this ignorant crap? there's no discovery in this "secret cable". there is only a factoid which agrees with what everyone has known about the massacre since day 1
this is fucking pathetic of you slashdot, to pass this on. you are spreading ignorance. watch all the fucking conspiracy morons get in a tizzy that this proves some hollywood style line of thought. pathetic. and you support morons by posting this "shocking discovery" slashdot
a tonsil and an appendix cost the body a pittance to run. their existence is also explained in terms of them slowly atrophying away, like our toes used to be fingers. in other words, your examples support my argument
now you tell me what it costs the body for an "extra" kidney in terms of maintenance, and therefore, why do we have it?
you sense potential? i sense evil. i have to wonder at what kind of asshole you are
of course desperate people do desperate things. you think that's some sort of revelation? it's typical, no matter how much money is floating around in society. in the rich fat decadent west, are guys who lose it all on gambling, or can't laid with a child as they want to, or whatever, and a black market for certain desperate people in desperate situations exists. everywhere. not just nigeria
go to guetamala. frequent newspaper headlines scream about rich americans coming to steal guatemalan babies for shady purposes. the reaction is not money grubbing, the reaction is fear and hysteria and hatred and anger. meaning yes, desperation forces some people into moral insanity. emphasis SOME. more like a few. for most of us, there IS a baseline of moral behavior, no matter how squalid your surroundings. people understand they have to live with themselves the next day
i'm just worried about your phrasing as you seem to suggest the selling of a baby in nigeria is acceptable and normal, and it's weird only in the west, and only because we're so rich and decadent
which really, really makes me wonder about your character
Slashdot Mirror
yes, they operate out of the nearby country of thighland, in the city of bangcock
wow
halle berry hate above and beyond expected nerd parameters
readjusting nerd proximator settings
whoosh whoosh
Hey, asshole: she's an academy award winner. Meaning: she's a pretty face, plus a lot more. If you place her mentally in the same category as Pam Anderson, you're the idiot.
I await your lecture as to why her academy award for best actress has no meaning.
So sayeth an anonymous coward on the Internet, signifying nothing.
there is no MILF party
well there is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moro_Islamic_Liberation_Front
but in the american sense... hmmm... maybe there SHOULD BE a MILF party
you must be female. as any male is impressed no matter what halle berry does
i'm the only asshole in a Filipino horror movie from New York
hey, it's wikipedia: add it ;-)
but this movie proved to me that, above all else, Kevin Bacon is really good at playing assholes in the movies
plus I liked the brief cameos: the Hugh Jackman F-bomb scene and the Rebecca Romijn Mystique reprise. But where the fuck was Storm? Halle Berry couldn't be bothered or they didn't offer her enough $ for a brief appearance?
almost obligatory whenever these kinds of stories pop up on slashdot:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_elements,_materials,_isotopes_and_atomic_particles
and even more importantly, how does this magic element relate to mining operations on pandora, and is it the stuff that makes 10 foot tall blue chicks hot?
Why do people pay so much attention to her? Her coverage is way out of proportion to her actual influence. Ignore Sarah Palin. If she polls highly, then go and cover her, but look:
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/rudy-giuliani-leads-republican-field-cnn-poll/
Giuliani, Romney, Palin, Paul, Cain... 16%-10%
How much coverage is Giuliani or Romney getting? Paul or Cain? In proportion to Palin? Why is this also-ran attracting the same media attention as if Queen Elizabeth and the reanimated corpse of Michael Jackson and Xenu toured East Coast tourist spots?
It's bizarre. Palin is an also-ran. Please try to ignore this media virus.
are you a well-crafted troll, or a genuine fucktard?
i'm to blame for idiots believing what idiots believe? or forget about me: you are saying that anyone with knowledge is to blame for what the hordes of ignorants believe?
is that your thesis? is that an actual belief of yours or are you sir a well-crafted troll who got me to bite?
i can't believe anyone is that genuinely fucking retarded, you have to be a troll. for the sake of humanity, i hope you are a troll
who is to blame for the ignorance of those who can't be bothered to find easily discovered truth?
i'll tell you who is to blame: THE IGNORANTS THEMSELVES
"That story is about a paper recently released which claims to prove something that for a long time had been generally assumed to be true."
ok, so why don't you involve yourself with the Collatz conjecture and stay out of this story, because this story is actually
"story is about a wikileak recently released which repeats facts that have been known for a long time, but trumpeted in such a way as to be an amazing discovery"
get it yet?
no, there's no evil at work here on slashdot's part, only stupidity:
"omg, look what they found in wikileaks!"
(and what they found is mundane)
there is bringing out all the facts, then there is a headline that points to one factoid in the events that implies, years later, that the massacre didn't happen
that's spreading ignorance. duh
i'm not talking in absolutes. i'm talking about what is universally understood by all parties
although, for the sake of truth, universal agreement by all witnesses is as close as you get to an absolute in reality
"If you knew this to not be true, yet let it remain generally believed, then it is you to blame"
interesting. i am to blame what hordes of idiots believe, who couldn't care to know what actually happened
that's quite a burden i bear. but i'm glad you see i have this power. let me start by waving my magic wand and getting creationists to believe in evolution, and truthers to believe osama bin laden bought down the world trade center, and birthers to believe barack obama is a christian who was born in hawaii
hey, i don't think i have this power to dispel what idiots believe. you do
It's funny that you put "shocking discovery" in quotes a few times, as though anybody here (or in the news article, or in the cables) was claiming that it's a "shocking discovery". Looks like it's just you.
then why post the story at all? what is the reason for putting this on the front page of slashdot on june 5, 2011?
i don't see evil at work hear. i see stupidity. "omg, look what they found in wikileaks!" (and what they found is mundane)
there was no bloodshed inside the square, the bloodshed happened around the square. but it's called the tiananmen square massacre, because that was the focal point of the conflict. duh
furthermore, there never was any contention about what happened and where. this "shocking discovery" is mundane fact universally understood and agreed upon by anyone who has seriously looked at the massacre, or actually been there
so to post this cable, as if it is shocking to discover that which has always been known, has the appearance of a cover up or a smear against china, in the eyes of your average idiot reading this post who's knows nothing about tiananmen square
so why post this ignorant crap? there's no discovery in this "secret cable". there is only a factoid which agrees with what everyone has known about the massacre since day 1
this is fucking pathetic of you slashdot, to pass this on. you are spreading ignorance. watch all the fucking conspiracy morons get in a tizzy that this proves some hollywood style line of thought. pathetic. and you support morons by posting this "shocking discovery" slashdot
a tonsil and an appendix cost the body a pittance to run. their existence is also explained in terms of them slowly atrophying away, like our toes used to be fingers. in other words, your examples support my argument
now you tell me what it costs the body for an "extra" kidney in terms of maintenance, and therefore, why do we have it?
" There's potential here"
you sense potential? i sense evil. i have to wonder at what kind of asshole you are
of course desperate people do desperate things. you think that's some sort of revelation? it's typical, no matter how much money is floating around in society. in the rich fat decadent west, are guys who lose it all on gambling, or can't laid with a child as they want to, or whatever, and a black market for certain desperate people in desperate situations exists. everywhere. not just nigeria
go to guetamala. frequent newspaper headlines scream about rich americans coming to steal guatemalan babies for shady purposes. the reaction is not money grubbing, the reaction is fear and hysteria and hatred and anger. meaning yes, desperation forces some people into moral insanity. emphasis SOME. more like a few. for most of us, there IS a baseline of moral behavior, no matter how squalid your surroundings. people understand they have to live with themselves the next day
i'm just worried about your phrasing as you seem to suggest the selling of a baby in nigeria is acceptable and normal, and it's weird only in the west, and only because we're so rich and decadent
which really, really makes me wonder about your character
that's what the bleach is for
you take the... oof... OUCH! stop th-
~CARRIER SIGNAL LOST~
it's da bomb
you forgot the obligatory ...yeaaaaahhhhhrrrr!!!
(The Who song ""Won't Get Fooled Again" fades in)