Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Boy Sells Kidney For iPad2

aquabat writes "According to Shanghai Daily, a boy from the Anhui Province desperately wanted to buy Apple's flagship tablet but didn't have enough cash. Rather than waiting to save up the money for the Apple product when it invariably gets marked down, the lad decided to sell one of his kidneys for 22,000 yuan (roughly $3,400) so he could afford one. But, surprisingly, the scenario in which the organ was harvested wasn't in the best of conditions, and the boy isn't feeling very well."

210 comments

  1. Greed by kyrio · · Score: 1, Troll

    He got exactly what he wanted.

    1. Re:Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the surgery was performed unprofessionally.

    2. Re:Greed by petteyg359 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's his own damn fault for agreeing to have some random person on the internet perform invasive surgery. Stupid actions have consequences.

    3. Re:Greed by nomadic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ahh, that legendary slashdot compassion.

    4. Re:Greed by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      All surgery has risk. But I agree that this action was highly unethical and harmful to the patient, whose mental health issues (valuing an iPod over a kidney is not an expected attitude) should have been addressed first. Not to mention that according to TFA the hospital is not qualified to perform transplants, so the organ was probably "wasted".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Greed by petteyg359 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Compassion for stupidity only results in an increase in stupidity.

    6. Re:Greed by dwarfsoft · · Score: 4, Funny

      One kidney? That's a bargain! Over here it costs an arm and a leg.

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    7. Re:Greed by somersault · · Score: 2

      valuing an iPod over a kidney is not an expected attitude

      Anyone who's ever witnessed an Apple fanboi wouldn't be that shocked. I certainly wasn't. Dismayed, yes.. shocked, no.. this was monumentally stupid. He should have just got a cheap Chinese tablet, or used iPad, even if he was desperate for a gadget fix.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Greed by jschmitz · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true Christian (note the big C)

    9. Re:Greed by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's pretty hard to have compassion for something so obviously stupid. If he'd sold it to help his sick mother or something that would be grounds for compassion, but he significantly shortened his lifespan to buy a tech toy which will be passe in a year's time, if not sooner.. wtf..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Greed by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yup.. Like the compassion needed for the teenage girl that runs over and kills a motorcyclist.... Give her a break, she's a new driver, you need to expect her to kill a few people!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Greed by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I heard he was saving his arm/leg to buy the inevitable iPad3...

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case the compassion would be directed towards those injured/killed by the stupid act. Same as in the case of someone deluded enough to seriously harm his health to buy a new tech toy.

      No one here is claiming we should be compassionate to the doctor who performed the surgery (which would be closer to your analogy).

    13. Re:Greed by kryliss · · Score: 1

      Hell... He probably knows several people that build the things all day long, maybe they could have just smuggled one out for him...

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    14. Re:Greed by slackbheep · · Score: 2

      To be realistic most of us simply do not have an infinite amount of compassion. While yes, ultimately this is a story about a man selling his organs for things he cannot afford... It was an iPad.
      Not food, clothing, shelter or even a chance to improve his lot in life just the days hottest piece of tech.

    15. Re:Greed by Unkyjar · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and what's with those damn pedestrians too?!! I mean, those legs are death traps, they don't absorb the impact of a car at all. Compounded with the fact that pedestrians don't even wear safety equipment half the time, it's like they're asking to be hit by cars, trucks and buses.

    16. Re:Greed by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true American, living your life from safety-tested cradle to carefully scrubbed and disinfected coffin, and in between using gallons of hand sanitizer and standing in line with your shoes off at the airport.

      Isn't it shameful living your life in fear? Must personal safety be the most important consideration at all times? Don't you ever get bored?

    17. Re:Greed by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      100% agree.
      We need to stop believing the drivel that is being shoveled at us.

      All points of view are valid. (Bullshit. Some points of view have no basis in reality.)

      There is no black and white, good and bad. It is all shades of gray. (Again Bullshit. Some people and ideas are just dead wrong. This is one of them.)

      There must be tolerance for all our differences. ( This one is complicated. Yes. Tolerance should be practiced for most differences. No tolerance for child rape and so on. But. People tend to act as if tolerance and acceptance are equal. They are not. You should definitely be able to tell the difference between me accepting you and me tolerating your existence.)

      There are many more. And compassion without reason is one.
      Do not feel compassion for a person that chooses to sell their kidney for an iPad. It does them no good. It does you no good. It does society harm.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    18. Re:Greed by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      Spoken like a true American, living your life from safety-tested cradle to carefully scrubbed and disinfected coffin, and in between using gallons of hand sanitizer and standing in line with your shoes off at the airport.

      Actually the US driving test has reached the point that its stupid-easy. When I hear about people taking several attempts to pass it (at $20 each, one per day with no limit) I get a little concerned. In exchange, we have stupid road rules and enforcement because they have to be set up on the assumption that every driver is a no-talent assclown.

      Contrast this to the UK drivers' test which, at least back in the 80s when I left, was long, extensive, had a limited number of attempts per year, and on which you could be failed for "lack of confidence." As a result you seemed, at least, to have far fewer completely moronic drivers on the road and could set things up with the assumption that most drivers actually knew how to drive.

      Indeed, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=5180 :

      The United Kingdom has a good record for road safety compared with most European Union (EU) countries. In 1999 the United Kingdom had the lowest road death rates per 100,000 population in the EU, at 6 per 100,000 of population. This compares to figures of 9.3 per 100,000 population in Australia, 8.2 in Japan and 15.3 in the USA. Across the EU, the average road death rate for children was around 2.6 per 100,000 of population - again, the UK had the lowest rate at 1.9 per 100,000.

      Sometimes having to actually pass a real test before doing things that are hazardous to other people can be a good thing.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    19. Re:Greed by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Nah, to qualify for a "Christ Award" he'd have to do something incredibly stupid, die as a result, and then have a bunch of followers who claim he miraculously came back to life.

    20. Re:Greed by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at your posting history, you have some fairly deep-seated issues and it's fairly obvious that you're using Slashdot as an outlet. Get outside and breathe the fresh air more - perhaps move out of the city if you're stuck in one.

      It's fortunate that people are more compassionate than you, otherwise you'd probably be out on the street by now. The only stupidity here is your religious understanding of the human brain as having the potential to be a perfectly rational machine rather than just another biological organ with the potential for programming and faults. This guy, if even real, is either an ignorant kid or a man with significant mental health problems, as is anyone who would destroy his body for short term thrill. Even though you and any fellow human would be better off if he were healthy, your sadism instead forces you to revel in his suffering. You're faulty, and I'm sorry for you.

      tl;dr You're a buffoon and people don't even expect gratitude for their tolerance of you - how lucky are you?

    21. Re:Greed by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't disputing that the driving tests are stupidly easy -- that's a given. GP thinks that only a fool would ride a motorcycle, and that they are to blame for any accident they may be involved in.

      I find that retarded because it can be (and is!) taken to dumb extremes:
      *Anyone who drives over 50 mph DESERVES to have an accident!
      *Anyone who drives a compact car DESERVES to get crushed by one of these SUVs!
      *Anyone who rides a bicycle or walks DESERVES to get hit!
      *Anyone who doesn't think and act JUST LIKE ME is a Darwin Award-winner waiting to happen!!!!11!

    22. Re:Greed by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope this is just a sarcastic joke. There will always be a safer way to travel, but that doesn't mean it's "ok" when people die because their vehicle wasn't good enough. My grandfather died when his car was hit by a large freight truck. The guy in the truck was just fine of course. Does that mean the death was deserved since his car wasn't as well "armored" as the truck?

    23. Re:Greed by Gill+Bates · · Score: 2

      Fuck you.

    24. Re:Greed by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Exactly, like all those people who leave their mother's basements. It's totally their own fault when they get mugged/kidnapped/hit by a bus/eaten by a velociraptor. Anyone who takes anything but the safest possible path in life deserves to die.

      In other news, why does /. insist that I have every single comment above the one to which I'm replying open before it'll let me actually type anything?

    25. Re:Greed by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      This is not an Apple fanboi - how could he be, he can't even afford an iPad - you think he has an iMac or MacBook pro kicking around?
      This is a guy who has fallen victim to the wonderful world of crass materialism. He doesn't care that it's made by apple, he cares that everyone else has one of these things, and he had better get one too.

    26. Re:Greed by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      It certainly does someone some good. Seriously, you are neglecting the fact that there is someone out there who needs a kidney, and probably will die without one. How can you be so sure that this is harmful for society? If there aren't enough people willing to donate a kidney for no compensation, then you can increase the pool of donors by offering some compensation. That's capitalism, isn't it?

    27. Re:Greed by Malica · · Score: 1

      Try comparing how much time the average American spends driving versus how much the average person in the UK spends driving before you start reading too much into those numbers. Spending over 2 hours a day in a car just commuting to work every day is very normal for someone in USA as they just don't have the option to just hop on a train like most of those in the UK.

    28. Re:Greed by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 1

      I've taken that as a well-intentioned (although possibly misguided) attempt to get people to read the comments they are replying to.

    29. Re:Greed by retchdog · · Score: 1

      they should measure deaths per total miles driven, not per capita... those statistics are meaningless in this context.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    30. Re:Greed by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Do you live a stupid-free life? If you do, you'd be the first I've ever met.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    31. Re:Greed by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Actually, not so much - there's a pretty well agreed upon bias towards putting the collective good ahead of individual good in Eastern countries and the reverse, a bias promoting individual good over collective good in many Western cultures. So much so that criteria for many mental illnesses can be radically different based on cultural factors.

      To rephrase your statement to take this into account - "valuing an iPad/money AND the ability to help someone else who needs it with an organ" - muddies the waters a bit.

      In Japan, an executive who fails in business may commit suicide as a way of atoning for the harm his failures have caused others, even, in some cases, for failures that were beyond his control. That is considered honorable (if, in more modern times, a bit extreme) while in the US it would be considered (at least by mental health professionals) to be an obvious sign of mental illness. Similarly, the way that children are raised - what is considered good parenting in some traditional Eastern cultures may be considered brutal abuse by Westerners (see: Tiger Mother), while the way many in the West raise their children would be considered neglectful to the point of abuse in some cases by many in the East.

      This should not be read as a criticism or endorsement of any particular culture - just an acknowledgement of the very real fact that what may seem insane to one culture is actually considered well adapted in another. I could very, very easily see a young Eastern culture individual valuing a bit of cash + the opportunity to help someone else with this act as being within the range of normal.

      I won't get at the medical "professionals" who did the operation - no idea where they trained or what is considered normal, but I know quite a few people who work with very important and very complex systems all the time who seem to have no problem what-so-ever trying something that is vastly outside their skillset and could have really horrible consequences with a "fuck it, let's roll" attitude. To be blunt, they probably were more worried about ruining the kidney than killing the donor, because whoever was the recipient likely had the money and power to ruin them while the kid obviously didn't.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    32. Re:Greed by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      No. I understand cause and effect, though, and that actions have consequences.

      Do you not understand those? If you don't, you'd not be the first I've ever met...

    33. Re:Greed by Idbar · · Score: 1

      And I hope the iPad 4 comes with mind control for this kid.

    34. Re:Greed by taucross · · Score: 1

      You exhibit the emotional maturity of a twelve year old boy. It is plainly obvious you have no concept of empathy. In due course you will come to understand where kindness lies (hint: it's not within the bounds of reason), but only after great suffering. Good luck.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    35. Re:Greed by taucross · · Score: 1

      So it's not a matter of principle, just a matter of taste?

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    36. Re:Greed by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      How does that work?

    37. Re:Greed by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 0

      hell no. i visit slashdot regularly to get my dose of stupid from all of you.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    38. Re:Greed by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 0

      You should definitely be able to tell the difference between me accepting you and me tolerating your existence.

      Geeks are notorious for missing social cues, wetware is not a typical nerd's expertise. It is highly likely that many otherwise intelligent people will miss that difference.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    39. Re:Greed by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Currently in the USA, lived in the UK, so I do know what you mean - and you're right, to a point. But sitting in traffic for long periods of time is unlikely to cause fatal road accidents (I'd agree more if the stats were quoting all accidents, not just fatalities). And plenty of people in the UK commute by car. Still, that was an adjunct point - the drivers on the roads over there appear more skillful, and in fact are tested to be so; this allows the rules of the road to be set up far more intelligently. Which was itself an adjunct to the point that the original GPP was making which was that the US had rules that swaddled people up with safety.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    40. Re:Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard there's an app for that.

  2. Sounds completly bogus story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nn

  3. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're stupid enough to want that, you deserve no more.

    Sorry, but it really is just that. And isn't it supposed to read 'unsurprisingly'?

  4. Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he going to sell the other one when the iPad3 is released?

    1. Re:Next step by piripiri · · Score: 5, Insightful
    2. Re:Next step by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It would be funny if it were true. Fortunately iDevices hold their value quite well, and may even increase in value if they're jailbroken. Strange but true.

    3. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be funny if it were true.

      man you apple fanbois really can't take a joke can you...'oh that's not funny because it's not true'...wanker

  5. ipad 3 by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    What will he do when ipad 3 comes out?

    1. Re:ipad 3 by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      you can always sell parts of your liver

    2. Re:ipad 3 by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      He's got another kidney.

    3. Re:ipad 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why he'll donate half of his liver, his corneas and his bone marrow once a week for six months of course. At which point the iPad 4 will be out with it's shiney new... case. ;-)

    4. Re:ipad 3 by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

      Sell his left nut.

    5. Re:ipad 3 by maxume · · Score: 1

      That was indeed the joke.

      Well spotted.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:ipad 3 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sell the other kidney. That is why you have two.

    7. Re:ipad 3 by Metabolife · · Score: 1

      Ipad 3, Kidney 2

    8. Re:ipad 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was indeed the joke.

      Well spotted.

      You've got to get up pretty early in the morning to slip something past the fat nerds on /..

    9. Re:ipad 3 by Arlet · · Score: 1

      He could sell his brain... didn't use it anyway.

    10. Re:ipad 3 by eltora49 · · Score: 1

      Sell his brain .. cos he obviously ain't using it..

  6. fair swap by joss · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always thought ipads were offal

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re:fair swap by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      rofl we have a winner~!

  7. This, literally, makes me ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That is all.

    1. Re:This, literally, makes me ill. by Abstrackt · · Score: 0

      That pretty much sums up my reaction. This is literally sickening, in many ways.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:This, literally, makes me ill. by rjstanford · · Score: 0
      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:This, literally, makes me ill. by linuxgeek64 · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was indeed literal, because you did indeed contract cholera, tuberculosis and chronic insomnia from reading this story.

  8. Tsk by return+42 · · Score: 1

    Wonder if he'll qualify for a Darwin Award?

    Hey, maybe when the next version comes out he'll sell the other kidney!

    1. Re:Tsk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll read about it on my iPad.

    2. Re:Tsk by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      sadly, this boy will be able to circumvent Darwin by selling his left and right nut for the iPad 4 and 5; the gonads will be used to breed more greedy little stupid shits.

    3. Re:Tsk by matrim99 · · Score: 1

      It's all in the spin.

      "Boy sells kidney for an iPad 2"
      "Boy donates kidney to stranger and gets an iPad and some cash as a reward"

      Same facts, different spin. This kid didn't need an iPad, he needed a PR person to milk his story to see what else he could have gotten besides the known cash & prizes...

      --
      Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  9. So, what happened to humanity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an Apple advert here every single day now.

    Also people sacrificing themselves to the pyre of materialism, but that's how the world economy keeps running.

  10. People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by rednip · · Score: 2

    People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys, I believe that there was even talk of legalizing the trade in places. It's not hard to see why some people would be willing to sell their own 'extra' organs for what they might see as a princely sum. Many people die from just such circumstances every year, it's a sad reality. The fact that one of the things he bought was an iPad2 is only a detail showing that his 'needs' were purely superficial and enough to get picked up as a story by Slashdot.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys, I believe that there was even talk of legalizing the trade in places. It's not hard to see why some people would be willing to sell their own 'extra' organs for what they might see as a princely sum.

      If they think "my family is starving - this could feed them for years" or "I can start a new life" then maybe. But in this case it was "I could get a shiny toy!".

    2. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are no "extra" organs. A kidney donor's physiological reserve is diminished after donation. Sure, the donor can live to a ripe old age with just one kidney - provided nothing ever goes wrong. However their ability to deal with extreme cases like infection, toxicity and pH/electrolyte imbalances is compromised and they tend to die a lot faster in these situations than a person with two functional kidneys.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Summary claims he got over three grand for his kidney. He could have gotten quite a bit more than an iPad out of this, but I suppose "Chinese Boy Sells Kidney and Spends About 15% of the Cash on an iPad 2" doesn't have the same ring to it.

    4. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is one of those things that seems "obviously" true, but the data does NOT bear it out. Living kidney donors do not suffer from diminished quality of life or life expectancy. There is a modest increase in blood pressure with increased risk of hypertension but minimal decline in eGFR (ie the remaining kidney picks up most of the slack). Cohorts with good follow-up have followed subjects as far out as 28 years post donation without significantly increased mortality.

      The set of ICU-level conditions that would rapidly kill a living kidney donor but not lead to long-term morbidity/mortality for a non-donor are so small as to be negligible.

      The people who do worst as donors are the obese, but I am not aware of any research comparing obese living kidney donors to obese non-donors, so it isn't clear to me at all that their lesser outcomes (worse progression of hypertension with proteinuria) represent an interaction between obesity and loss of renal function rather than just the pernicious effects of obesity.

    5. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense... I was born with one kidney (solitary kidney), a condition that affects about 1 in 1000 people, and life expectancy is not affected: "Overall survival was not affected by URA. URA is compatible with normal longevity and does not predispose the contralateral kidney to greater-than-normal risk." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1472993/

      Most cases of solitary kidney go unnoticed unless someone has an MRI or CT scan for unrelated reasons, like I did after an auto accident.

      And in direct opposition to your claim that "there are no extra organs" lies the appendix, the only organ whose presence constitutes a substantial risk factor for premature death. Tonsils could arguably be in that category as well, though they at least have a purpose, even if it's extraneous.

      Posting anon since I'd rather not attach my medical history to my username.

    6. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I'd do it to save someone's life. But just for money? Nope, one kidney punch or car accident away from wiping out that other kidney. Heck, even a bad/awkward fall. No thanks.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    7. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Threni · · Score: 1

      Even if you did, after 18 months you're left with another Apple product which'll look pretty lame compared to the iPad 4/5/6....

    8. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by rich_hudds · · Score: 2

      But you'd always be saving someone's life. People don't just buy kidneys for their kidney collection.

      My Step Dad might need a new kidney in a few years and it's made me realise that this ban on selling them is wrong. People are dying needlessly.

    9. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The National Public Radio show Intelligence Squared had an interesting debate a couple years ago on the market for organs.

      Should We Legalize the Market for Human Organs?
      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90632108

    10. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I dunno - at some level money is life. People with money inevitably do better health-wise. What if you spent the money from the kidney on buying healthier food, or paying health insurance premiums, or putting it in your "insurance won't pay for it" savings account?

      I doubt I'd ever sell a kidney just for the cash (if it were ever legalized so many people would do it that you wouldn't get much money for it anyway). However, the health vs money tradeoff isn't quite as clear is one might think.

    11. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the average donation age is, say, 30-35, then studies "as far out as 28 years" for a species with an average life expectancy of 75-80 years doesn't tell us much about increased mortality once the donors hit old age, only that mortality doesn't increase much while they are otherwise healthy.

    12. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Maybe then you can get someone to donate a kidney to you. At least allow backsies on your original kidney.

    13. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      Probably the average Slashdot reader needs a RAID-1 metaphor to understand it.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    14. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      The vermiform appendix is an organ. It appears that we've evolved in such a way that it is in fact an extra organ at this point.

    15. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I can see the reasoning behind the ban on sales, but I also think it should be legal to sell your own organs if you wish. I have no idea what the full criteria for the organ donor list is, but why shouldn't one be able to say "I want to give my to Bob." ?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    16. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      My point was a random accident could wipe out your one remaining kidney. You could be healthy as a horse and some drunk driver rams you and... oh shit.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:People do pay 'big' cash for kidneys by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Like a few rounds of 'duck duck goose.' Lol.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  11. On the positive side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The boy has probably saved another person life. Hopefully these operations were not too botched and everyone will get to live.

    1. Re:On the positive side... by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 0

      Whoa, compassion in Slashdot? You must be new here.

    2. Re:On the positive side... by swanzilla · · Score: 0

      Now get off our lawn.

    3. Re:On the positive side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad he didn't just commit suicide and donate ALL of his organs.

    4. Re:On the positive side... by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      On the negative side, the chance of receiving a kidney is now firmly on the side of the patient with the money or highest bidder. But I guess that's more-or-less always been true.

  12. Corruption at its finest by conscarcdr · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to TFA, the hospital where his kidney was removed was in fact a military one: "PLA 198 hospital", which, when questioned by the police, claimed no knowledge on the broker who arranged the deal, since the whole department was "contracted to a businessman".

  13. Just his kidney? by heptapod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, if he gave Steve Jobs his pancreas his family could've gotten some shares of Apple, an iPad 2 and more Mac shit than he could shake a chopstick at. It'd save Steve the embarassment of buying his way ahead in line for another transplant.

  14. wow by jschmitz · · Score: 0

    Take that Google!! lol

  15. Medical Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For 3g service, i recommend to sell your cornea

  16. Not sustainable though by cvtan · · Score: 1

    He will be in bad shape by the time the iPad13 comes out.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  17. Hope he got the wifi model by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That 3G data plan will cost an arm and leg

    1. Re:Hope he got the wifi model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    2. Re:Hope he got the wifi model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will say anything to get ahead.

  18. Apple can fix this... by Thruen · · Score: 1

    ...they just need to start a more official trade-a-kidney program. That way they can trade an iPad for a kidney and then turn around and sell the kidney to someone who needs it! They'll just need to do better than Sony, who tried this once in the '90s but after only shipping empty boxes to the first few thousand people decided it was easier to just call it "donating" a kidney. You can buy Sony-brand kidneys over in Japan, you know.

    1. Re:Apple can fix this... by ray_mccrae · · Score: 1

      What do you mean resell the kidney? Mr Jobs needs to feast on little children's kidneys to survive.

  19. He should have by kenholm3 · · Score: 1

    gone for the Wii

    --
    God is good all the time! -K
  20. Crazy by BreezeC · · Score: 1

    Take a kidney to exchange a "apple"? That's crazy!
    Do he want to kill himself for a "apple"? Oh,he won't,he just want a ipad.

  21. Other end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how the recipient of the kidney is feeling now?

  22. Ipad2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the pain and suffering that makes it awesome.

    And then we have the OLPC program giving away what is just about the same hardware as an ipad....

    I'm not sure... But knowing these two things kinda makes me sad to be human.

  23. I'm so sorry... by theLime · · Score: 1

    but I hope he got a free copy of iAlysis

  24. Kidney for Steve Jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heard Steve Jobs needed one.. here is one for him..

  25. Boys actions were shortsighted perhaps by mysidia · · Score: 2

    It's horrible he made so great a sacrifice, so lightly. $3000 is a paltry amount for such a thing.. Man, either donate it, or get actually a decent amount for it such as $100k or so.

    On the bright side... someone actually needs that kidney, and good will probably come out of this.

    Maybe that's what the boy was thinking anyways... donate and help someone... get a little reward.

    Trading body parts meant to last your entire life for toys that will last a few years and then be outdated, doesn't seem like a good plan. What's next... his left hand? Big toe? How 'bout some bones.

    If he has kidney problems later than life, he will regret this. He might find himself on the buying side, then, I suppose, assuming he can hold out long enough.

    1. Re:Boys actions were shortsighted perhaps by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      You have to understand that $3400 in China is a lot closer to a year's salary than you might think. In the US $100K is a decent salary for a year, but not too long ago a Chinese company that was building an aftermarket navigation system for cars said they were paying top software engineers $3500 a year. Now a few years have gone by and things change in China pretty quickly these days but still $3400 is probably more money in one pile than most people ever dream of having.

      It would be easily equivalent to someone handing you $100K or more in one lump sum. Actually for this person it is probably two or three times the largest amount of money they might ever make in a year, so it would be a lot closer to $500K for someone living in the West.

      Buy one later? Ha! They might give the kid $3400 for his but the price the recipient is paying is probably over $100K as it is. The markup is terrific.

    2. Re:Boys actions were shortsighted perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there's a free market for kidney's they really aren't worth a whole lot. About $5k in true US buying power, I believe. It's the black market that drives the price up, and of course the dangers too.

    3. Re:Boys actions were shortsighted perhaps by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Why a Kidney (Street Value: $3,000) Sells for $85,000

      Poor Pakistanis Donate Kidneys for Money

      Since it's not a legalized trade, prices will vary wildly.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Boys actions were shortsighted perhaps by mysidia · · Score: 2

      You have to understand that $3400 in China is a lot closer to a year's salary than you might think.

      Really? What does an iPad2 cost in China? The article seemed to suggest the boy could have saved the money, but choose not to. If annual salaries in his area were $3400, the boy would have little/no chance of saving a few $k.

      Could it be that not everyone in China has the same salary? Perhaps you should revisit that.

      China has a massive population, and I am sure not everyone has the same salary.

      Not everyone in China can be a farmer, farm worker, and sweat shop worker. There are actually businesses that exist in China, you know.... I would expect anyone who has enough media access to know about, understand, and want an iPad2, is not in the substinence farming crowd. Clearly the boy/his family have discretionary income; otherwise, he might be selling his kidney for food, water, or shelter.

  26. Re:I would have just whored myself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Prostitution worked for me.

    I don't think you understand. When you pay people to have sex with you, you aren't the prostitute.

  27. Time for China to let their people have real money by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    This is just a sign of the time - Chinese are the ones producing the damned things, and they are the ones having to sell their kidneys to own one. I am really wondering how much more will it take their people, before they rise against their government and stop their government from printing their own currency into oblivion, just so the foreigners can enjoy fruits of Chinese labor so cheaply, while the Chinese standard of living is stagnating, because their own money does not buy the products, they themselves create.

    They are the manufacturer of the world, they are paying for the inflation of the world with more production and they immediately feel the inflation (expansion of money) as rising prices, so last year they had 15-25% price increases for food. How much more of this will they allow their government to perpetrate upon them? They need to cut it, call it a day and stop subsidizing Dollars and Euros, etc., and let their own people enjoy their own work in their own appreciating currency.

  28. He got a great deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Apple products normally cost an arm and a leg.

  29. As Someone w/ a Kidney Disease by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    As someone who has a kidney disease, this is good to know. I wish more healthy people were willing to do this out of charity and compassion. But I don't begrudge someone doing it for money/iPad/whatever.

    I'm not throwing stones. I have no idea if I'd be willing to donate a kidney if I had healthy ones.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:As Someone w/ a Kidney Disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me help: Nope!

      Our own natural sense of survival far outweighs any charitable notions.

  30. Human centipad, you're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides the centipad will get a free upgrade to ipad3, whereas he won't...

  31. There's an app for that! by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

    Hey now he can use his new IPad2 to track his dialysis appointments.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  32. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess he preferred iPad over iPeed.

    -dvikram

  33. Need a New Kidney? by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    There's an App for that!

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  34. Re:I would have just whored myself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that "Ahh! My eyes! I'll give you $100 to put your pants back on!" counts as prostitution...

  35. At least it's legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's fine, what could possibly go wrong? Now, if they'd given him one for free, oh the horror.

  36. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by digsbo · · Score: 1

    You are very right about this. But consider that the Chinese government has been telling its citizens to acquire gold for several years now, and they've done as they were told. It's in preparation, I believe, for decoupling the yuan from the dollar. I am shocked few people are aware of this, because when that happens, the pent-up domestic demand in China will have a chance to be met, and a large middle class will emerge there in a few year (much like the USA after WWII). In the US, the dollar will become worthless, and we will regress economically about 5 decades' worth.

  37. He did NOT sell for an iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sold his kidney for $3500 bucks. One of the things he bought was an iPad. But that's not a great headline I guess, and it doesn't fan the flames of Apple obsession. "I gotta buy an iPad - people give kidneys for these things!". whatever.

  38. It's a very sad story, yet many people here don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is just a kid trained and conditioned to "need" things like iPads from birth.
    Then he was persuaded to sell his kidney. I really wonder why did they pay him instead of leaving him unconscious in the bed.

    All those who say he is stupid and deserves it, should think twice, because that's exactly what that broker must have thought about him. You are perfect candidates for the job (duties: trick not educated people, kids and people not smart enough into selling their organs. They are stupid, they deserve it).

  39. he than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Returned to work at Foxconn making iPads the next day.

  40. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I would have to give a kidney to own one too, I am obiously not going to but that doesnt change the situation. So I ask why should I care about the chineese having real money when working class slobs like I are in the same perdictiment

  41. How many iPads did Steve Jobs pay . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    . . . for his liver? Just figuratively asking.

  42. I don't think that would work. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Steve already bought all the livers he will ever need.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  43. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    But my question was not directed at you, reread my comment. My question was a rhetorical one, directed at the people of China - What gives, people of China? Why do you want to give up you kidneys to own stupid iPads, when you are the ones manufacturing them? All you have to do is send a real message to your government (or better yet, take it down), so that the Chinese currency is no longer manufactured and US/EU inflation is no longer pushed into Asia.

    As for you, you should be asking exactly the same thing of your government, as the reason that China is manufacturing everything today, is that your government is destroying your currency, while not allowing business to restart in the US due to business regulations and taxes. You should be asking your government: WTF? Why are you destroying incentives of businesses to even exist in the country, never mind hiring people here?

  44. Self-curing problem by yt8znu35 · · Score: 1

    This fixes itself. If Apple fanbois want to sell their organs for each new Apple device, that's fine with me. (In China they probably would have harvested his kidney anyway.)

  45. Who said black market organs dealer aren't honest by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    Our world is full of surprises, it's good to know that there are good and honest black market organs dealer out there that would not take advantage of someone in need for cash. I can sleep easy at night knowing that if i need cash i can always turn to a black market organs dealer and trust that he/she/they would only removed what I'm willing to sell rather than murder me and sell all of my organs.

  46. OIther Apple Fanbois by hduff · · Score: 1

    Look lame in comparison.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  47. Sad state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A sad statement on our world-wide materialistic culture.

    The kid was so brainwashed to believe that above all else he must own some shiny toy, to the point where he would let some complete stranger carve bits of his guts out to get the money to pay for the toy. He's no better than a street junkie looking for a fix, the fix might last longer than a few hours but the shiny gadget's appeal will wear thin in a year or so when another new shiny gadget comes along.

  48. TheOatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apple

  49. Communism at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did the kidney go to a party member?

  50. r we sure? by Twillerror · · Score: 1

    This isn't a south park script that got leaked? Seriously this is the kind of crap Kenny would do.

    1. Re:r we sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least this instance didn't involve reference to Human Centipede.

  51. Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    He could have bought a Nigerian baby for $192 (see: http://www.nodeju.com/nigerian-police-closes-baby-factory/9840/ ), sold the baby's kidney for $3400, bought an iPad and have come out of it with a profit!

    While life is valuable here in western countries (consider what Americans spend in the final year of their lives for a few more months of breathing), elsewhere, and depending upon where you are, life can be bought for as little as a few hundred.

    That life transported elsewhere can then be bought and sold for profit, depending upon local laws. It's a weird world we live in, but I'm surprised no one in China has yet thought about selling organs from cheaply produced Nigerian babies.

    As population rises, and an increasing number of people get older, I predict a huge underground market for body parts, and since China is swimming with people, and in Nigeria, life is cheap. There's potential here....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baby organs are too smal I guess. You'd have to smuggle them to China and then raise them to a harvestable age. Including all the bribes to get officials off your back, that'd be fairly costly.

    2. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      " There's potential here"

      you sense potential? i sense evil. i have to wonder at what kind of asshole you are

      of course desperate people do desperate things. you think that's some sort of revelation? it's typical, no matter how much money is floating around in society. in the rich fat decadent west, are guys who lose it all on gambling, or can't laid with a child as they want to, or whatever, and a black market for certain desperate people in desperate situations exists. everywhere. not just nigeria

      go to guetamala. frequent newspaper headlines scream about rich americans coming to steal guatemalan babies for shady purposes. the reaction is not money grubbing, the reaction is fear and hysteria and hatred and anger. meaning yes, desperation forces some people into moral insanity. emphasis SOME. more like a few. for most of us, there IS a baseline of moral behavior, no matter how squalid your surroundings. people understand they have to live with themselves the next day

      i'm just worried about your phrasing as you seem to suggest the selling of a baby in nigeria is acceptable and normal, and it's weird only in the west, and only because we're so rich and decadent

      which really, really makes me wonder about your character

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's a weird world we live in, but I'm surprised no one in China has yet thought about selling organs from cheaply produced Nigerian babies.

      Well the main issue would whether the cheap humans have the genetic / antibody match to be a suitable donor for the expensive human.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 1

      There's potential here....

      Potential for a lawsuit if you don't license my business method patent for Selling African Infant Organs to Black Market Asian Organ Dealers.

    5. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Americans can adopt that model to pay for their mandatory health insurance (which they'll need afterwards).

    6. Re:Organ factories: If he'd been a bit smarter... by painehope · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with this...it just means less 419 scammers in the future (and since I get bombarded w/ "I'm a loving, God-fearing woman...blah-blah...stuck in Nigeria due...some bullshit" whenever I get on a dating site, I say kill them all, harvest their organs, and get some use out of the motherfuckers; of course, it's debatable whether the organs would work, since they are from Nigerians).

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  52. Android? by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    China makes some great Android tablets wonder why he didn't just spend under $100 on one of those? Screw Apple!

  53. Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance by cerelib · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else immediately think of "Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance"? That is a seriously disturbing movie.

    1. Re:Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repo! actually came to mind first.

    2. Re:Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. That entire Vengeance Trilogy is as a matter of fact.

  54. Re:I would have just whored myself. by Angeret · · Score: 1

    Prostitution worked for me.

    I don't think you understand. When you pay people to have sex with you, you aren't the prostitute.

    I don't think you understand. The original statement was 'I would have whored myself' this implies recieving the money.

    I don't think you understand. You're posting on Slashdot. By default, even as the prostitute, you would have to pay someone to have sex with you.

    Oh yeah... Woosh! :)

  55. Next step... the grave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could trade his remaining kidney for a coffin and a plot in a cemetery. The joke of course, is that the preferred method of disposal in China has move onto cremation.

  56. Ha! That's what parents are for... by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

    His mother called the blue ones when she saw all his tech stuff: she thought he'd stolen it.

    --
    I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  57. Greed...? Short-sighted-consumerism? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I have to blame his parents, but it takes a village to raise a child.

    In this case, I see the village as the whole world which is dominated by advertising/marketing messages.

    Many of us feel immune or dulled to the messages of advertisers. But children are especially vulnerable to it. This is why so much is being marketed to younger people rather than to older people -- younger people are more receptive to advertising. (Among older people, the question of necessity is more often asked as is the question of worth or value.)

    So, with all the hype and marketing push for these "things" (ipads, nike shoes, you name it) we end up seeing tragedies such as people trampled, attacked or even killed while waiting in line to buy "things." There have been cases where children/youths kill each other for their shoes! The tragedies of this sort are endless.

    This is NOT an Apple phenomenon.

  58. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Businesses aren't manufacturing anything in the US partly because of regulation but also because it makes no sense to do so any longer. The cost of manufacturing stuff in China is so low that it makes more sense to make it there and ship it - even at outrageous shipping costs - than it does to make it in the US.

    I recently had some stuff made in China and shipped here. The shipping cost was 25% of the cost of the finished products, but the total cost was about 50% of the cost of doing the same thing in the US. So why wouldn't anyone go this route?

    The real problem is that there is no hope of any trade balance with China because the government actively blocks imports from the West. It is incredibly difficult to sell anything to China and currency transfer regulations are just the beginning of the problem. The US is completely barred from any sort of tariffs on imported goods and services (outsourcing) when China is free to impose regulations that block foreign goods. This means the US will always be owing China with no possible recourse. Somehow, this doesn't seem fair, just or right.

    I'd say the only way to go would be to make goods from China simply unavailable in the West. There doesn't seem to be any way to do that without an open declaration of war however. That would be messy. One way to get this done with relatively clean hands would be for the US to repudiate the debt with China - just tell them to go pound sand and that we're not paying. The response from China would have to be (1) blockade of any future trade and (2) declaration of war, probably with a nuclear exchange. Messy, but at least it would be "their fault for starting it." But the result would be no more trade with China and a forced repatriation of manufacturing in the US and probably EU.

  59. Re:Greed...? Short-sighted-consumerism? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    If the parents are incompentent to raise a child, I guess it takes a village to step in and take over. Otherwise, the Hillaryism is just silly - you end up with a child with the values of a mob (the village) rather than the values of a person. Mobs are good for some things, but ethics and morality get left behind.

  60. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going to start a nuclear war over treasury bills. While the people that run China might end up living in slightly less opulence after a trade war, they're far better off than they would be living in a parking lot. Those guys have something to lose.

    China doesn't really have the ability to strike at the US conventionally, and the US doesn't need to bomb the Chinese (they're already ahead if they cancel the debt). I'm sure there might be some skirmishes in far-away lands, and a bunch of people will die on both sides. I doubt either country would be seriously affected from actual battle.

    However, I don't really think the US has dug itself into quite the hole that people make it out to be. The Chinese gave us a ton of tangible goods, and we gave them a bunch of IOUs. The only real problem from the US standpoint is that we've gotten used to this arrangement. However, if it ever ends we'll just have to make our own goods, and it isn't like we don't know how to do that. The transition could get messy, but for people whose main value is in their ability to work and not their bank accounts it probably won't be a bad deal.

  61. I'll gladly give you my kidney Tuesday.. by TheRealJRoll · · Score: 1

    ..For an iPad today!

  62. mother nature doesn't lie by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    she gives you the capacity to live, without any more or less than what you need

    if our distant ancestors were all carrying around some massively overengineered amount of blood filtration capacity, the mutants amongst them with a much smaller capacity would do better reproductively with lower biological overhead in terms of needs. and therefore that much smaller amount of capacity would become the new normal. mutants with below capacity would suffer premature death and lower vigor and vitality and suffer reproductively for that

    in other words: no, i'm sorry. whatever mother nature has given us is the right amount, and half that amount is half the amount needed for quality of life. i don't think you are being dishonest, i just don't think you have all the data before you, simply because there is too much obvious weight as to the opinion of what mother nature says is the right amount of kidney capacity

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:mother nature doesn't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she gives you the capacity to live, without any more or less than what you need

      ....

      in other words: no, i'm sorry. whatever mother nature has given us is the right amount

      Really? I wish you'd told me that before I let the Docs take out my tonsils and appendix! I was hesitant at first, but in the latter case I was told leaving it could be fatal - wish I'd known that Doc was barking mad and mother nature had it right all along.

      Oh and those wisdom teeth that were pushing my other teeth so far round that they were growing in two neat rows at one point - I must've needed those 2 rows of teeth for something - damn meddling dentists! Maybe mother nature had plans for me to a be a kind of human-shark :D

      Or it could just be that this set-up is the most optimal for the largest segment of the fertile populace and that specific cases have highly variable options? Two kidneys is a damn fine set-up that has no drawbacks over having one (aside from the increased risk of something going wrong with one - which is off-set by the very fact that you have two anyway :)) - but in some circumstances, hopefully more significant circumstances that a new IPad being released, it is fine to have just one.

      Apologies if this offends your anthropomorphic sensibilities - but if you do happen to speak to 'mother nature' regarding this, please send her my way as I have a few other bones to pick with her... :)

    2. Re:mother nature doesn't lie by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      a tonsil and an appendix cost the body a pittance to run. their existence is also explained in terms of them slowly atrophying away, like our toes used to be fingers. in other words, your examples support my argument

      now you tell me what it costs the body for an "extra" kidney in terms of maintenance, and therefore, why do we have it?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:mother nature doesn't lie by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So you don't believe in the existence of vestigial organs?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:mother nature doesn't lie by dmr001 · · Score: 1

      His data really is pretty good (as you can imagine, it gets collected easily enough in living kidney donors). From my favorite reference, "Overall long-term survival after donor nephrectomy is the same as similar matched individuals who did not undergo surgery." (Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, et al. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA 2010; 303:959. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:459.) But it doesn't account for trauma (so maybe mother nature has given us some paired organs in case a spear goes through one), and you don't account for the fact that mother nature works by trial and error (e.g., sperm need to be at 35 C, so let them hang out vulnerably in a scrotal sac instead of making them happy at 37 C).

  63. If he stole an iPad 2, would cost more organs by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    If the lad had stolen in iPad 2, it might have cost far more than just a kidney if he had gone to jail. He might have ended up with both kidneys harvested and most other major organs.

    1. Re:If he stole an iPad 2, would cost more organs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure that China doesn't execute and organ-harvest iPad thieves.

  64. Call me coldhearted... by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    But really, this kid got what he deserves. This kind of stuff goes on in China all the damn time. On the upside, the kid didn't have his organs harvested when he was in a labor camp. He at least got paid a bit of money, and has something to show for it. The only reason this made any kind of Western headlines is because he wanted an Apple widget. If organ harvesting was feasable back when America was up & coming, you can bet the same crap would have gone on. Instead? We just snatched people of different color from their homelands, and forced them to work for barely enough to eat. This kind of stuff will hopefully fall by the wayside more as more people in China see more stories like this. Which sadly, due to the media cencorship in China will make things rather difficult. They have little exposure about this kind of stuff that it's incredibly stupid to do, and they need more stories about this kind of thing so others are less inclined to make such stupid mistakes.

    Simple kind of scenario when you were growing up. Did you learn that something was dangerous when your parents told you it was a bad idea, or did you learn when you watched Timmy or Sally down the street do that exact thing, and get injured? One gets hurt, the whole neighborhood learns a valuable lesson.

  65. Not feeling well? That's easy to fix!!! by nghate · · Score: 1

    There's an app for it ! ;-)

  66. Is this a troll? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Did it ever occur to anyone that he might be mentally ill and/or developmentally disabled? Jesus, he'd almost have to be. Last I checked, a proper and just society protected people from this sort of thing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  67. Upgrade? by bmidgley · · Score: 1

    The upgrade to an iPad 3 is going to be a killer.

  68. compassion for children by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

    Did you read the part about where it was a kid? Kids do stupid things - all kids - unless they are raised in a glass bubble. So yeah, try to have some compassion for children who do things that seem stupid to adults. Geez.

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    1. Re:compassion for children by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I'd also mention we have websites dedicated to kids doing even stupider things than this kid did. At least this kid's 'stupidity' was a step towards saving somebody else's life.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:compassion for children by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Who says he saved anyone's life? The hospital was not capable of doing transplants, the random-internet-guy who arranged the thing was obviously shady, and the procedure was probably not all safe for either the patient or the organ.

    3. Re:compassion for children by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Who says he saved anybody's life?
      1. The hospital was not equipped for transplants.
      2. The random-internet-guy wasn't the least bit suspicious. (Caution: Sarchasm guardrails not in place!)
      3. The procedure seems to have been done improperly. If the patient is not in good health afterwards, do you really think the organ is faring much better?
      4. Following #3, when random-shady-internet-guy inserts this organ into random-shady-person-to-be-saved, it is likely they will die of complications, rejection, infection, etc.

      He's more likely to have shortened the recipient's (assuming there is one) lifespan than save them.

    4. Re:compassion for children by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Okay, fine, so why pay somebody $3500 for a kidney? Is it a delicacy there?

      It was botched, fine, but I have a lot more respect for this kid than I do for kids who do things like try to jump over cars.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  69. Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dialysis? There's an app for that."

  70. F--- the children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said "kid" was 17. I'm all for letting kids make mistakes to learn from them, but this is Darwin Award level dumb.

    1. Re:F--- the children by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Wow... 17!!! Of course you'd have to be pretty young to think that 17 wasn't still a kid.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    2. Re:F--- the children by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      Wow... 17!!! Of course you'd have to be pretty young to think that 17 wasn't still a kid.

      Many people in the generation of my parents were married and having children and buying houses by 17, sadly this reflects poorly on current generations that their maturity is severely stunted

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  71. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    The only real problem from the US standpoint is that we've gotten used to this arrangement.

    - no, that's not the real problem.

    The real problem is that there is no capital investment in USA, it moved to China and other places, and this means that for USA to be able to restart manufacturing, it either will have to rebuild all the tools it will need by hand, if the trade is fully blocked, or it will have to sell a lot of energy and other mined resources to Chinese and others, in order to get the tools, machines, finished products necessary to restart manufacturing and production.

    However there is another problem - over the last couple of generations, USA was losing not only savings and manufacturing base, but also knowledge and trade skills necessary to run production facilities. This also will have to be rebuilt or re-bought, repatriated somehow, things don't just appear out of thing air without capital and knowledge.

  72. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    The main 3 reasons for any business not to stay in USA are:

    1. Inflation by government printing.
    2. Income/corporate/payroll taxes, as well as the mess of medical taxes.
    3. Business regulations.

    The cost of labor is really on a distant fourth if it even enters the real equation, the real problem is always the government, and if government is not involved, the cost of labor will adjust to the market conditions, so it's really not that important.

    Business regulations kill far more potential jobs in US than cost of labor, and taxes kill the most jobs.

    As to Chinese and their tariffs - they have high tariffs, but those tariffs are applied to raw materials and energy. Who, from the West is importing to China? Well, Germany is, and China has a trade DEFICIT with Germany, not a surplus, as it has with USA, so clearly, if Germany can have a trade surplus with China, importing various tools and machines, etc., then it cannot be used as an excuse by US that it cannot deal with China on equal footing.

    No no, it's not about tariffs from the Chinese - that's a misconception brought to you by the same government, that tells you that the way government measures CPI is a true indicator of inflation and that the official employment numbers are real and that GDP is an indicator of real economic growth - it's all nonsense.

    The reason China has a trade surplus with USA, and USA has a 50 billion USD/month deficit with China, is the same reason USA has a large deficit even with Canada - and you can't say that Canadians are actively preventing USA from doing business, USA is Canada's main partner, they wouldn't dare.

    The reason USA has this problem is because US government has declared a war on US economy and US dollar by growing the government to over 10% of the working force, by growing government expenses and obligations without any ability and plan to pay any of it out, because all of their plans are based on ridiculous assumptions about the economy, all of those assumptions are wrong. The reason is the insane income/corporate/payroll taxes, the involvement of US government in economy in terms of subsidies to large monopolies, destruction of competition in the market, destruction of currency by printing, destruction of real credit rating of the USA (not the garbage they tell you on TV - real credit worthiness of US private sector is in real trouble), destruction of the labor force through all the labor laws, that make US labor totally unattractive for any sane businessman.

    I would not hire a US worker, the regulations, taxes, punishment for hiring them are outrageous, so I can't imagine why anybody sane would either.

    As to China having all those IOUs in their Treasury - they'll shake it off, they'll be fine, they have the real wealth - production capacity, they have real economy - product oriented economy, which makes stuff. They'll shake it off, let their currency rise, and that will be the end of this age of US running on foreign credit and foreign manufacturing subsidy.

  73. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    True, but a trade war will start slowly over time too. If the Chinese float their currency their prices will steadily rise, making it less cost-effective to outsource there. Either work will shift to some other country, or back to the US. I doubt the Chinese will just wake up one day and declare a blockade or something, and the US isn't about to just do something like default on its debt without some kind of warning.

  74. Ironically enough by Pirulo · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs gets a liver by selling them

  75. Sounds more like a Darwin Award to me by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    But he lived, so he's not a winner I guess

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  76. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Either work will shift to some other country, or back to the US.

    - why would it go back to the place, where the market conditions are nearly the worst in the world for investment capital and business regulations and labor market, it's really not going to return. It will have to be rebuilt domestically, with new businesses, willing to start from scratch basically, which is going to be insanely difficult, as the interest rates for US based businesses to get real investment and to be able to buy real machines and tools and talent will be very high, I expect high double digits crossing into triple digits interest rates - very few can manage to get that kind of a loan, because the requirements for collateral will be just insane and mostly impossible to satisfy.

    No no, as Chinese let their currency rise and US defaults on all of its debt, the Chinese currency will skyrocket, and more and more investment capital will come to China from all over the world, this will be the validation of the capitalist principles at work, ironically it will be done by a so called Communist state, so that's unfortunate. USA gives capitalism a bad name and China gives Communism a good one, it's all insanely creepy in terms of the outcome of what people will believe.

    However the productivity in China will be higher and higher, as market will see more of the Chinese consumers being able to afford all of those products and services they couldn't afford before, so for at least a few decades, they'll have growing market. Where it will go from there? I don't know, but it's not going just to disappear into nothingness, and at some point people really should take a note, that socialist agenda fails the economies and free market is the way to go.

  77. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it matter that they're the ones producing them? Boeing employees can't afford their product that they produce, either.

  78. Re:Greed...? Short-sighted-consumerism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take a village; the village just can't keep their noses out of everyone's business, so instead we are forced to let the village help.

  79. He actually won one in a contest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but Apple said they couldn't give it to him, so he ended up selling an organ to someone else to get one.

  80. Yeah, this was morally wrong in China too... by jeko · · Score: 1

    Before anyone starts spouting off about how we shouldn't apply "Western" values to Asia, I'd like to point out that whoever wielded the knife here was in screaming violation of Chinese medical ethical standards:

    The Chinese Counterpart to the Hippocratic Oath

    "A Great Physician should not pay attention to status, wealth or age; neither should he question whether the particular person is attractive or unattractive, whether he is an enemy or friend, whether he is a Chinese or a foreigner, or finally, whether he is uneducated or educated. He should meet everyone on equal grounds. He should always act as if he were thinking of his close relatives. [2]"

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  81. I hope you're taking a page from Swift... by jeko · · Score: 1

    I'm really hoping this is a viciously satirical post, but I'm falling victim to Poe's Law.

    If you're aping Jonathan Swift, congratulations, you got me.

    If you're not, and you're actually as old as your user id would seem to indicate, then might I suggest that in your Last Will and Testament you request that they put an all-steel fireproof shovel into your coffin with you before they put you in the ground?

    It'll make things easier when you get to Hell and they tell you to start digging.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  82. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by sjames · · Score: 1

    You mean that for the first time in several decades, a single income will be enough for a family of 4 to make ends meet?

  83. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by digsbo · · Score: 1

    Put it another way, but yes, sort of. There aren't going to be enough jobs for two people to find worthwhile work. It will make economic sense to have someone stay home and do the domestic work, and maybe have a part-time crappy job. And there will be one car. And maybe one TV, and maybe not such great cell phones and blu-ray players, and when things break they won't get replaced, they'll get fixed. There's a lot more to why many families of four have two incomes than just living expenses. We've become an unsustainably consumption-oriented culture, and we're going to regress to a period when we were more production and/or savings oriented.

  84. this should be how it is done by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    although, he should have gotten much more money for it. if we can sell plasma, semen and eggs, why stop there? if someone is willing to pay, they should be able to get what you have. plus, it'd be hard to be against this but for any other free markets.

    --
    ...
  85. Re:Who said black market organs dealer aren't hone by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    organ markets shouldn't be black markets in the first place. they should be completely legit and regulated.

    --
    ...
  86. Re:Time for China to let their people have real mo by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Well, if you are going to compare it that way, then compare the actual USE of the product - government inflation means that the loss of the purchasing power will not allow the Boeing employees to book flights on those planes, never mind buying them outright.

  87. There's an organ for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an organ for that...

  88. Bet he was approched by Steve Jobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey kid... Give you an iPad for that kidney."

  89. My Whine by assertation · · Score: 1

    I would like to suggest that a reason be given for rejecting a story submitted to slashdot. Giving a reason can preserve good will which will encourage regular users to help with moderation and keep submitting stories.

    I submitted this story and it was rejected without a reason. That wasn't the first time, so I usually do not bother to respond to requests from slashdot to pitch in work.

    Seeing that my submission was likely a duplicate I feel better. Hence my suggestion.

  90. More law enforcement, Less oppression by assertation · · Score: 1

    This might not have happened if the Chinese government put less resources into oppressing its citizens and more resources into law enforcement for shutting organ harvesting down.

  91. Wow... by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

    Now THIS, ladies and gentlemen, is an Apple Fanboi... all the rest are officially posers.

    --
    Stone
  92. What will you give me for my liver? by painehope · · Score: 1

    It comes already pickled.

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  93. sadly blaming children to justify misanthrophy by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

    I guess I could say that generations before your parents people were married (or cohabiting), having children and building their own houses before 17. I guess that reflects badly on your parents' generation.

    Or I could say that all those people getting married, having kids and a mortgage all by 17 sure weren't going to college or university. I guess that education and learning wasn't very important to them. I suppose that reflects badly on their generation too.

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    1. Re:sadly blaming children to justify misanthrophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every generation has its highlights and its bruises. Every generation tries to avoid the faults of its parents, often going the opposite direction in equal excess. Few people ever really learn from history.

  94. waw by simonesepanther · · Score: 1

    I read this story....on my iPad

  95. Re:Who said black market organs dealer aren't hone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Organs don't really have a long shelf life. Unless they already have compatible recipients lined up it may not be worth the trouble of covering up your murder.