Some of the bugs are unfixable, as well. (I assume they mean without physcially replacing the chip with a 'fixed' one that doesn't exist yet.) Unfixable here means that even an update to the microcode is not enough. That's why your BIOS needs to be updated so that the new microcode can be uploaded into your CPU and hence correct the errornous behaviour.
No, it means that you still can make a more powerful console, but that at the same time you also need to change the architecture of it. Apparently it is complex enough that not all power can be used in an efficient manner. It also means that they could have created a simpler, less complex console and still have the same level of power at a reduced price.
"There could also be health problems caused by reliance on medicine, resulting in weak immune systems. Preventing deaths would also help to preserve the genetic defects that cause cancer."
Wait a minute! Isn't it the case that most deaths due to cancer are after procreation and therefore the defective genes are already passed on the to next generation. In other words, the human species are already passing on these genes no mather how good we become in keeping people with cancer alive. So the question is: how do we preserve the genetic defects that cause cancer by preventing deaths?
You are giving a very incomplete answer. AMD has a line of very low voltage K8 chips called Turion (yes, the name's questionable, but that's nothing new when it comes to brands in the processor world). The most efficient run at about 25W, but unlike with the P-M, this figure includes AMD's on-die memory controller, while Intel defers that extra power cost onto the board logic. Also, one of them (I can't remember which) reports wattage at peak value, and the other at typical value.
I do remember, Intel lists only 75% of the TDP while AMD tells the truth and lists the peak value.
"You also need to take into account that Intel measures power handing of their processors at 75% peak performance where AMD measures at 100% peak performance. This is why the Pentium D while on paper doesnt look like its burning that much more power than an Athlon X2, but it actually burns a lot more.
Heim has a somewhat unified theory about forces. Like Lorenz force, that is a force affecting charged particles, the Heim-Lorenz force affects any particle that has mass. (But the force still needs to be shown to exist in experiments)
That's one of the reasons why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being build at CERN (Genèva, Switzerland). One of the particle they hope to find is the Higgs particle, which, according to theory, is the particle that exerts gravitation.
According to planning, somewhere during the summer of 2007 the beams should be operational and the first collisions should be possible.
You're almost correct. Probably wind installments have become somewhat cheaper and yes oil has become more expensive. However oil is not the only source of energy for power plants. There are also nuclear power plants and those prices are not correlated to oil. Same goes for coal and hydro plants. Natural gas on the other hand does follow the oil price, but is still cheaper then oil. In other words, when the oil price doubles, the power price does not.
So, I think wind has become cheaper and at the same time the "regular" energy price has gone up to a level where they can compete now.
OpenSuSE is in some ways analagous to fedora, except that you can't get a boxed set of fedora linux, nor fedora manuals, nor any fedora support from the vendor, while with SuSE, you have the option of downloading and freely using OpenSuSE, or purchasing SuSE 10.0 retail, which comes with all the extras
The extras in the boxed version are non open packages (e.g. acrobat reader) and even some commercial software (e.g. a demo version of Mainactor 5). Due to the open character of OpenSUSE these packages are not included. And of course you buy 90-day installation support with the boxed version.
After reading the story, it seems that Microsoft, after locking-in their customers, they have locked-in themselves. They need to change Windows fundamentaly, but they cannot. I love the irony.
I'm just wondering what this will do to your radio/computer/TV/... I'm sure all your electrical applicances are safe, but I've never seen anything that says that your electronics are uneffected by putting a signal on your AC current. I guess I'd still go for DSL or cabel.
Fair enough. It did not go into details. It was Holland who used bit string representations at first. One could use floating numbers too, see Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs by Zbigniew Michalewicz. Also, different strategies for evolution can be used.
It still think GA and GP are different though. While with GAs, one generally tries to find optimal values for a set of paramerters, in order to find an optimal solution. With GP one tries to find this solution by genetically breading some sort of program. In addition, the problems one tries to solve with GAs are generally different from those being solved by GPs. This is because of the nature of the two. In stead of making GP a subset of GA, I would make both of them a subset of "Evolutionarry Computing" and let them live along side happily. I guess it comes down to viewpoints...
In the beginning there were genetic algorithms only. Genetic programming has been developped later. It was John Holland with Adpaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems in 1975 who used the idea of evolution first. It was Koza during the '90 who started the generic programming. The two are verry different, though both use the evolution theory of creating new solutions and selecting the most promissing ones. Genetic algorithms use at their hart bit strings that represent a solution, while genetic programming works on trees of instructions (like: turn left, walk).
I did work on this thing for my Masters thesis. This was at the beginning of 1998. Read a few interesting articles by Adrian Thompson. I don't know when he started but it has to be well before 1998.
Some people within our project use the ACE library for multi-threading. Personally I have no expericene with the ACS library. They've used it for its portability. At the time some software was being developed it was not clear weather the software had to run on Linux or VxWorks, hence ACE. Quick search on google gave me: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
Slashdot Mirror
No, it means that you still can make a more powerful console, but that at the same time you also need to change the architecture of it. Apparently it is complex enough that not all power can be used in an efficient manner. It also means that they could have created a simpler, less complex console and still have the same level of power at a reduced price.
Wait a minute! Isn't it the case that most deaths due to cancer are after procreation and therefore the defective genes are already passed on the to next generation. In other words, the human species are already passing on these genes no mather how good we become in keeping people with cancer alive. So the question is: how do we preserve the genetic defects that cause cancer by preventing deaths?
I do remember, Intel lists only 75% of the TDP while AMD tells the truth and lists the peak value.
Quote taken from: http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/a
That's one of the reasons why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being build at CERN (Genèva, Switzerland). One of the particle they hope to find is the Higgs particle, which, according to theory, is the particle that exerts gravitation.
According to planning, somewhere during the summer of 2007 the beams should be operational and the first collisions should be possible.
You're almost correct. Probably wind installments have become somewhat cheaper and yes oil has become more expensive. However oil is not the only source of energy for power plants. There are also nuclear power plants and those prices are not correlated to oil. Same goes for coal and hydro plants. Natural gas on the other hand does follow the oil price, but is still cheaper then oil. In other words, when the oil price doubles, the power price does not.
So, I think wind has become cheaper and at the same time the "regular" energy price has gone up to a level where they can compete now.
OpenSuSE is in some ways analagous to fedora, except that you can't get a boxed set of fedora linux, nor fedora manuals, nor any fedora support from the vendor, while with SuSE, you have the option of downloading and freely using OpenSuSE, or purchasing SuSE 10.0 retail, which comes with all the extras
The extras in the boxed version are non open packages (e.g. acrobat reader) and even some commercial software (e.g. a demo version of Mainactor 5). Due to the open character of OpenSUSE these packages are not included. And of course you buy 90-day installation support with the boxed version.
After reading the story, it seems that Microsoft, after locking-in their customers, they have locked-in themselves. They need to change Windows fundamentaly, but they cannot. I love the irony.
I'm just wondering what this will do to your radio/computer/TV/... I'm sure all your electrical applicances are safe, but I've never seen anything that says that your electronics are uneffected by putting a signal on your AC current. I guess I'd still go for DSL or cabel.
Fair enough. It did not go into details. It was Holland who used bit string representations at first. One could use floating numbers too, see Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs by Zbigniew Michalewicz. Also, different strategies for evolution can be used.
It still think GA and GP are different though. While with GAs, one generally tries to find optimal values for a set of paramerters, in order to find an optimal solution. With GP one tries to find this solution by genetically breading some sort of program. In addition, the problems one tries to solve with GAs are generally different from those being solved by GPs. This is because of the nature of the two. In stead of making GP a subset of GA, I would make both of them a subset of "Evolutionarry Computing" and let them live along side happily. I guess it comes down to viewpoints...
In the beginning there were genetic algorithms only. Genetic programming has been developped later. It was John Holland with Adpaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems in 1975 who used the idea of evolution first. It was Koza during the '90 who started the generic programming. The two are verry different, though both use the evolution theory of creating new solutions and selecting the most promissing ones. Genetic algorithms use at their hart bit strings that represent a solution, while genetic programming works on trees of instructions (like: turn left, walk).
I did work on this thing for my Masters thesis. This was at the beginning of 1998. Read a few interesting articles by Adrian Thompson. I don't know when he started but it has to be well before 1998.
Some people within our project use the ACE library for multi-threading. Personally I have no expericene with the ACS library. They've used it for its portability. At the time some software was being developed it was not clear weather the software had to run on Linux or VxWorks, hence ACE. Quick search on google gave me: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html