Those people would be your clean-freaks. You know, the people who aren't happy until everything is spot. And even then they'll fething else that still 'needs' to be cleaned.
I find that the zip file utilities in ME don't work work with.tar files. It looks at them and says 'WTF is this?' and puts the little windows icon with it so you know that it has no idea what to do with it.
How you vote affects how I vote. Please help protect the freedom of American citizens.
This is definatly a way to turn congressional heads. Anybody happen to know if congressional elections are coming up this year or maybe next? Because, as I'm sure everyone knows, the closer it is to election time, the greater impact the word "vote" has on the mind of a congressman.
The Proxomitron actually kills this attempt to launch readme.eml if you have "kill add-on scripts" checked. Never thought that a proxy meant to remove annoying things from web pages would actually stop a worm from trying to run on my computer.
Perhaps we should start a pool of money to give to the power companies in exchange for cutting off the power to these machines for say an hour? I think that will cause those machines to come down for a little bit regardless of any UPS ststem they may have. And since we'd tell the respective companies to do this all at the same time, that will prevent these computers from infecting themselves again.
Of course, the pool will have to be rather large since this would all have to be 'under the table.'
Re:Spammers doing themselves in
on
RFC for Spammers
·
· Score: 1
Generally all I have to do is look at the sender. If I don't know who it is, I can safely assume that I can delete the email then and there. None of this opening the email stuff. The subjects also tend to give spam away.
Sorry left a few words out. Should be:
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the fact that you anti-spam your email address is proof that you value your privacy. After all isn't unsolicited e-mail another form of privacy invasion? I believe that the average/.er values his/her privacy from all intrusion. Gov't or otherwise.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the fact that you value your privacy. After all isn't unsolicited e-mail another form of privacy invasion? I believe that the average/.er values his/her privacy from all intrusion. Gov't or otherwise.
Slashdot Mirror
On this page, it claims "[T]he rating system is strictly voluntary and carries no force of law."
Here's a little gem I found in there:
They also block Netscape 6.0/6.1 based on user-agent headers
Those people would be your clean-freaks. You know, the people who aren't happy until everything is spot. And even then they'll fething else that still 'needs' to be cleaned.
Even IE reports itself as a Mozilla thing. It's UA is something along the lines of: Mozilla/4.0 (compliant; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0)
I find that the zip file utilities in ME don't work work with .tar files. It looks at them and says 'WTF is this?' and puts the little windows icon with it so you know that it has no idea what to do with it.
This is definatly a way to turn congressional heads. Anybody happen to know if congressional elections are coming up this year or maybe next? Because, as I'm sure everyone knows, the closer it is to election time, the greater impact the word "vote" has on the mind of a congressman.
The Proxomitron actually kills this attempt to launch readme.eml if you have "kill add-on scripts" checked. Never thought that a proxy meant to remove annoying things from web pages would actually stop a worm from trying to run on my computer.
So, if they read my mouse movements, what happens when they try to predict what I want from my mouse gestures in Opera?
The one about covering your butt; it's in his sig
Of course, the pool will have to be rather large since this would all have to be 'under the table.'
Pink moose to purple willow tree 4... Checkmate!
Generally all I have to do is look at the sender. If I don't know who it is, I can safely assume that I can delete the email then and there. None of this opening the email stuff. The subjects also tend to give spam away.
It looks like this topic has been hit by a horde of unsolicited AC's
Sorry left a few words out. Should be: Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the fact that you anti-spam your email address is proof that you value your privacy. After all isn't unsolicited e-mail another form of privacy invasion? I believe that the average /.er values his/her privacy from all intrusion. Gov't or otherwise.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the fact that you value your privacy. After all isn't unsolicited e-mail another form of privacy invasion? I believe that the average /.er values his/her privacy from all intrusion. Gov't or otherwise.