Assuming mangoo is what I think it is, it does in fact contain fats, proteins, carbohydrates and probably glucose that oddly enough probably can be used somehow by this device.
In a society where education runs on a bare-bones budget to come up with a brilliant idea to spend more money spying on children in classrooms. I mean what sort of complete fucking moron comes up with this idea?
Next they will probably promote racial segregation [again... oddly enough] as a means towards a more unified society or something.
It hasn't radically changed but it has changed none the less.
We don't use K&R style function parameters. I'm rather certain various keywords are new [and deprecated like "auto"]. The language is actually a standard now, not just a "works on my compiler".
I can't really see a valid argument for most newer languages. For example, often people argue "with Java you don't need to recompile to run it elsewhere". But that isn't actually a feature of the Java language. It's a feature of the Java runtime environment.
Nothing is stopping people from writing a C compiler that targets a VM that is then subsequently ported to other boxes.
Similarly for Javascript [which is very much like C not Java... wierd, should be called C-script] C could be used there.
And similarly for CGI applications, etc, etc.
The only other language I can understand for daily use is Perl which is way better at text manipulation. C++ doesn't actually allow the author todo anything that can't be performed with clever use of structures [and not that complicated todo anyways]. Ruby and PHP are Perl knock-offs, Java is just stupid, slow and a bitch to work with, etc, etc, etc.
There is probably a reason why the vast majority of software people use is written in C. I just can't put my finger on it...
A raw truecolour 2048x1536 image is 9MB. So on a 1GB cart you could store 112 images. Add a simple lossless compression step and you could probably fit 200 or more images on the same cart.
Of course this is just a symptom of mankind. Want more and more and find less use for things. Sure a 1GB cart can only hold 1024MB of raw data, but instead of being wasteful by storing raw images actually put some work into it and store them properly.
Why not just use a high quality/lossless image compressor? Storing raw images is just plain stupid.
It is fairly trivial to mod the DCT to get a DCT like lossless transform [look for bindct in citeseer]. These transforms don't have as much coding gain but are better than raw storage. Even if you get 2:1 to 3:1 that lets you store 3GB of raw photos on a cheaper 1GB cart... math man!
Also [i dunno for sure] but doesn't JPEG2000 have a lossless mode? If the camera people [and software developers] chose to use that over the older JPEG standard it probably would be a tad better.
Giving developers more address space, faster processors, etc gives them *less* incentive smaller, more modular and optimized code.
This is why, for instance, word processors are 200MB now instead of the couple of KB they used to be.
Personally I agree that from the getgo RISC should have been used but the memory model didn't support that idea. when you are coding an 8086 with say 1KB of ram [in an MCU environment] being able to say
add al,[si]
instead of
mov ah,[si] add al,ah
Not only saved one register but would be smaller [and in this particular case...faster].
Now that desktop computers have on average at least 64MB of ram and most embeded systems come with at least a MB or two of memory it makes little sense to use CISC anymore.
I think the transmeta route is fairly ingenius. What would be cool though is if you could optimize for the transmeta offline [e.g. churn for more time optimizing] and feed the transmeta VLIW core directly or still feed it x86. Get the best of both worlds, e.g. x86 compatibility and the ability to create super-optimized apps for it.
Ok assume I'm a troll. I post with mozilla. So that means my original comment that all trolls use IE [and subjectively many good people use IE] is false.
I'm saying if you have motive and you have DNA to connect them to the scene. Boom probable cause.
1984 1984 1984!
I'll let you all in on a secret. The world as it is now sucks. Jobs moving over seas, corporations buying out our rights, dictators setting up shop and relgious biggotry [re: catholics] on the rise.
The word sucks now! We don't need to become 1984 for things to get worse.
I don't owe him a good answer. It really did make sense at the time. If he didn't like the answer he could have just shut his pie hole and fuck off.
Besides, I got defensive because he isn't the first person to demand the world from a project they're not paying for and then get publicly rude at the result. I didn't intentionally put a flaw in my gcd code, what he [and you] fail to realize is that I wrote [in this case LibTomMath] entirely from scratch almost over a 3 week period.
The gcd code is but a *small* part of the entire library and I personally didn't find it really astounding and awestruck that there was a bug in it. I fixed it and moved on.
My "made sense at the time" comment was what I like to call honesty. When I wrote the gcd code the logic for zeroes made sense.
I did admit I was wrong, hence I fixed the bug. He just didn't like the fact that I didn't completely flip out at how amazing a bug he had found.
Anyways, it is easy to say "oh you're flippant" specially when you offer nothing to the group, flame people who do [amidst their faults] and use pseudonyms like "clem" and "DSCOTT".....
I post with my real name, I give out totally open source projects for free. If people don't like me flaming them for being less than polite with me, well don't talk with me./rant
That "sparky" comment came after he flamed me for being polite. Let me recap the thread for you.
him: Your gcd() is buggy.
me: Oh, yup. I'll fix that. Made sense when I wrote it. Oh well, thanks.
him: I hope you don't take that attitude when someone confronts you at CRYPTO.....
Basically even after I told him that I was wrong, that I would fix it and explained why I wrote it the way I did [e.g. contributing to the conversation] he flamed me calling into question my motives.
Well fuck him and his mother. If he can't stand being right maybe he should shut the fuck up?
I don't get your point. There will always be people who don't like others. Does that mean you should hide in a cave by yourself for the rest of your life?
I mean you point out that some people on usenet don't like me. Would you like to see the weblog for my website where I offer free software that many people download [often they download newer versions as I release them, e.g. real users].
Some people hate me, some people like me. I never claimed [nor assumed] that I was a godsend. I realize [and publicly admit] my faults and the faults of my projects [e.g. bugs, etc...]. I don't get what your point is.
Instead I find it rather pathetic that the best thing you can do with your time is reply to all of my posts with "cans the manham". As if you are this mentally deficient that you can't think of anything better.
Also I feel the need to point out it is all to easy to critique the work of others when you bring nothing to the table. You say my projects suck. Good, now why do they suck? Can you offer anything in return?
I can easily say "all of your life's endeavours suck." but without any proof or evidence to backup my claim it doesn't mean much.
Slashdot Mirror
Damn skippy. Nutella!
I don't need to actually make a processor to know what sort of shit I would be interested in.
Just like you don't have to be a lumberjack to write books.
So, how about you shut the fuck up?
Tom
Assuming mangoo is what I think it is, it does in fact contain fats, proteins, carbohydrates and probably glucose that oddly enough probably can be used somehow by this device.
c ts .php
found via google:
http://www.abbys-sexual-health.com/fun/sperm_fa
So smartass AC, looks like you posted something that was on topic and insightful. Congrats!
TROGDOR!
Think about it. Burning extra glucose means it cannot be stored as fat or what not.
:-)
Kinda also revives the coppertop thingy from the matrix though...
What they really need is an implant that looks like a wall outlet so I can plug my discman into it
Tom
Can you please continue posting these? These sorts of replies are validating my existance. I need them to reassure I'm still alive.
I need you! Give me your soul!
Yes.
I don't get it. Can you rephrase your post in a form that doesn't read like a down syndrome retard bashed his keyboard with his forehead?
Thanks,
Tom
In a society where education runs on a bare-bones budget to come up with a brilliant idea to spend more money spying on children in classrooms. I mean what sort of complete fucking moron comes up with this idea?
Next they will probably promote racial segregation [again... oddly enough] as a means towards a more unified society or something.
That's not funny.
It hasn't radically changed but it has changed none the less.
... wierd, should be called C-script] C could be used there.
We don't use K&R style function parameters. I'm rather certain various keywords are new [and deprecated like "auto"]. The language is actually a standard now, not just a "works on my compiler".
I can't really see a valid argument for most newer languages. For example, often people argue "with Java you don't need to recompile to run it elsewhere". But that isn't actually a feature of the Java language. It's a feature of the Java runtime environment.
Nothing is stopping people from writing a C compiler that targets a VM that is then subsequently ported to other boxes.
Similarly for Javascript [which is very much like C not Java
And similarly for CGI applications, etc, etc.
The only other language I can understand for daily use is Perl which is way better at text manipulation. C++ doesn't actually allow the author todo anything that can't be performed with clever use of structures [and not that complicated todo anyways]. Ruby and PHP are Perl knock-offs, Java is just stupid, slow and a bitch to work with, etc, etc, etc.
There is probably a reason why the vast majority of software people use is written in C. I just can't put my finger on it...
Tom
First time that joke has been appropriate.
Tom
Hence the lossless compression step.
A raw truecolour 2048x1536 image is 9MB. So on a 1GB cart you could store 112 images. Add a simple lossless compression step and you could probably fit 200 or more images on the same cart.
Of course this is just a symptom of mankind. Want more and more and find less use for things. Sure a 1GB cart can only hold 1024MB of raw data, but instead of being wasteful by storing raw images actually put some work into it and store them properly.
Tom
Why not just use a high quality/lossless image compressor? Storing raw images is just plain stupid.
It is fairly trivial to mod the DCT to get a DCT like lossless transform [look for bindct in citeseer]. These transforms don't have as much coding gain but are better than raw storage. Even if you get 2:1 to 3:1 that lets you store 3GB of raw photos on a cheaper 1GB cart... math man!
Also [i dunno for sure] but doesn't JPEG2000 have a lossless mode? If the camera people [and software developers] chose to use that over the older JPEG standard it probably would be a tad better.
Tom
To play devils advocate here....
Giving developers more address space, faster processors, etc gives them *less* incentive smaller, more modular and optimized code.
This is why, for instance, word processors are 200MB now instead of the couple of KB they used to be.
Personally I agree that from the getgo RISC should have been used but the memory model didn't support that idea. when you are coding an 8086 with say 1KB of ram [in an MCU environment] being able to say
add al,[si]
instead of
mov ah,[si]
add al,ah
Not only saved one register but would be smaller [and in this particular case...faster].
Now that desktop computers have on average at least 64MB of ram and most embeded systems come with at least a MB or two of memory it makes little sense to use CISC anymore.
I think the transmeta route is fairly ingenius. What would be cool though is if you could optimize for the transmeta offline [e.g. churn for more time optimizing] and feed the transmeta VLIW core directly or still feed it x86. Get the best of both worlds, e.g. x86 compatibility and the ability to create super-optimized apps for it.
Tom
Oh oh, point in case.
Ok assume I'm a troll. I post with mozilla. So that means my original comment that all trolls use IE [and subjectively many good people use IE] is false.
So you in fact proved one element of my claim.
Tom
least insightful post ever.
In the newsgroup I read many of the most intelligent posters use non-OSS readers that are trivial for zealots to attack.
Tom
What are you talking about.
You tried to dismiss the whole line of DNA idents because "I may have been there to help."
I'm saying if the police have a motive [e.g. you wanted the dude dead] and they have your DNA on the scene then that is evidence to prove their point.
Nowhere did I say DNA is evidence itself of motive. Learn to read asshat.
Tom
You ain't very smart are ya?
I'm saying if you have motive and you have DNA to connect them to the scene. Boom probable cause.
1984 1984 1984!
I'll let you all in on a secret. The world as it is now sucks. Jobs moving over seas, corporations buying out our rights, dictators setting up shop and relgious biggotry [re: catholics] on the rise.
The word sucks now! We don't need to become 1984 for things to get worse.
Tom
One word: Motive.
I don't owe him a good answer. It really did make sense at the time. If he didn't like the answer he could have just shut his pie hole and fuck off.
/rant
Besides, I got defensive because he isn't the first person to demand the world from a project they're not paying for and then get publicly rude at the result. I didn't intentionally put a flaw in my gcd code, what he [and you] fail to realize is that I wrote [in this case LibTomMath] entirely from scratch almost over a 3 week period.
The gcd code is but a *small* part of the entire library and I personally didn't find it really astounding and awestruck that there was a bug in it. I fixed it and moved on.
My "made sense at the time" comment was what I like to call honesty. When I wrote the gcd code the logic for zeroes made sense.
I did admit I was wrong, hence I fixed the bug. He just didn't like the fact that I didn't completely flip out at how amazing a bug he had found.
Anyways, it is easy to say "oh you're flippant" specially when you offer nothing to the group, flame people who do [amidst their faults] and use pseudonyms like "clem" and "DSCOTT".....
I post with my real name, I give out totally open source projects for free. If people don't like me flaming them for being less than polite with me, well don't talk with me.
Tom
That "sparky" comment came after he flamed me for being polite. Let me recap the thread for you.
him: Your gcd() is buggy.
me: Oh, yup. I'll fix that. Made sense when I wrote it. Oh well, thanks.
him: I hope you don't take that attitude when someone confronts you at CRYPTO.....
Basically even after I told him that I was wrong, that I would fix it and explained why I wrote it the way I did [e.g. contributing to the conversation] he flamed me calling into question my motives.
Well fuck him and his mother. If he can't stand being right maybe he should shut the fuck up?
Tom
I don't get your point. There will always be people who don't like others. Does that mean you should hide in a cave by yourself for the rest of your life?
I mean you point out that some people on usenet don't like me. Would you like to see the weblog for my website where I offer free software that many people download [often they download newer versions as I release them, e.g. real users].
Some people hate me, some people like me. I never claimed [nor assumed] that I was a godsend. I realize [and publicly admit] my faults and the faults of my projects [e.g. bugs, etc...]. I don't get what your point is.
Instead I find it rather pathetic that the best thing you can do with your time is reply to all of my posts with "cans the manham". As if you are this mentally deficient that you can't think of anything better.
Also I feel the need to point out it is all to easy to critique the work of others when you bring nothing to the table. You say my projects suck. Good, now why do they suck? Can you offer anything in return?
I can easily say "all of your life's endeavours suck." but without any proof or evidence to backup my claim it doesn't mean much.
Tom
Whoa, I'm beginning to think you don't like me.
You've obviously not used one before. You have to *overpower* the FM station before your neighbours will hear ya.
Tom