Slashdot Mirror


Powered by Blood

Anonymous Coward writes "Bringing us one step closer to becoming centrally-controlled meatbots, Japanese scientists have developed a device that produces power from the glucose in human blood. Theoretically, this technology (aka "Dracucell") could produce 100W of power. Of course, it can't produce that much power in practice since your body stupidly wastes glucose in maintaining homeostasis. The scientists propose that this devices could be used to power implanted devices. Now how many of you Slashdotters would it take to power my laptop? I'll buy the cola!"

516 comments

  1. Some Interesting New Products... by eaglebtc · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is fantastic stuff! Pretty soon we'll see places like ThinkGeek selling stuff to boost your glucose levels. I can see the reviews from OverclockedCafe 50 years from now -- "HowTo: Speed up your pacemaker with Glucose!" Plus, with the embedded chips coming our way, we'll probably be tapping our circulatory systems to power in-built PDAs or to watch movies in the palms of our hands on a flexible OLED screen.

    Overclock Your Body NOW! Drink UBER-BLOOD(TM) XP!!

    fp btw.

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Gherald · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the most exciting application will be powering embeded 2.5" 100gb hard drives ;)

    2. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, using humans as batteries, now where have us well informed geeks heard about something like this before? What a novel idea.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    3. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Well at least its actually being done, as opposed to filmed...

      Regardles, we all know you can't combine the energy output of the human body with "a form of fusion."

    4. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not funny at all.
      homsar@byu.edu

    5. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 5, Funny
      Pretty soon we'll see places like ThinkGeek [thinkgeek.com] selling stuff to boost your glucose levels.

      Forget that, man. Do you realize this means I can eat ALL the potato salad I can fit in my stomach. And potato chips and popcorn and pretty much anything starchy. For those of us walking dangerously close to the diabetes line this thing could be great! I could power my laptop AND lose weight at the same time. I can just see the Infomercials now. Of course, we'll need Dan Akroyd to do the voiceover....

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    6. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by babtrek · · Score: 1

      Alright one step closer to being a Borg like 7 of 9 I could like that. Just need to get a wearble computer now and find a place to plug it in. Now the only way that it could be better is if they made it absorb the fat from all the food I eat, that way I could power the entire house.

    7. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      and you certainly can't make it work in a closed system when you feed the bodies into one another.

      more efficient to make ethanol out of that lovely sugar.

      But this is neat for running implants and no mistake.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    8. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you are anywhere close enought to looking like 7 of 9 that a wearable computer could make you her doppleganger..

    9. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Drink more Powerade(?)

      --
      Why not fork?
    10. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      complex carbohydrates != glucose

      of all the things to binge on, why the fuck would you want to eat potato salad?

    11. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Informative
      complex carbohydrates != glucose

      No, but that's what it ultimately turns into before entering your bloodstream.

      of all the things to binge on, why the fuck would you want to eat potato salad?

      For crying out loud, it was the first REALLY starchy thing that came to mind.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    12. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by gantrep · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because he can fit a lot of it in his stomach, due to its density. I don't like potato salad, but I know that eating pasta or meatloaf until your stomach is full feels a lot more filling than say, crescent rolls. And no I'm not fat. According to this my bmi is 18.8.

    13. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > more efficient to make ethanol out of that lovely sugar.

      Why not just add a second extractor to get energy straight out of the ethanol already in your bloodstream?

      What's that you say? No ethanol in your bloodstream? Well, put some in already!

      What's that you say again? You drank three shots of Scotland's finest single malt, and you're not drunk because the extractor's drawing all that ethanol to power your laptop? Just keep drinking!

    14. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have other uses for my palms, thanks...

    15. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Ugh, you just gave me the most horrible of thoughts...

      Scene: Nursing Home
      (Nurse is passing out dinner, walks up to Old Geezer to hand him his dinner.)
      Old Geezer: Hey young lady, how about dinner with an overclocked heart tonight, baby? Oh, trust me (taps on chest), this heart can keep up with you youngin' any time!

      *shudder*

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    16. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone remove his posting privaleges. He just burned evil images into my brain.

    17. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by egarland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe this is what they had in mind when they created Bender in Futurama.

      I love puns.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    18. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I think the old BMI tables need to be reviewed. I'll be the first to admit I'm a bit overweight, but I find it hard to believe that at 6'2" and 230 pounds I'm nearly obese. At the 170 pounds those charts say are right in the middle of "normal", I'd be a scrawny toothpick.

    19. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree on the basis that with a little experimentation, 6'3, 155lbs turns out to be in the "normal" weight category. I'm 6'3" 205 now, but I used to be around 175, and even at that weight, I was all skin and bone. There's no way in hell 6'3" 155 isn't underweight.

    20. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      My favorite BMI anecdote was that Michael Jordan's numbers put him as overweight -- and the chart's suggestion was "more exercise."

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    21. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well it also depends if you're 230 lbs and have alot of fat, or 230 lbs and have alot of muscle. I'm also 6'2", and only weight 200 lbs...but i see that i could stand to lose some weight.

    22. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Because he can fit a lot of it in his stomach, due to its density.

      That's pretty much what I was thinking. Also, the AC seems to have missed the point that complex carbohydrates are converted into glucose relatively quickly, as a big old starch molecule doesn't have a prayer of making it into the bloodstream.

      As for me, I DO need to lose weight, but those starchy foods are my downfall. If becoming a human battery can allow me to eat what I want and still lose weight, then hook me up to the Matrix!

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    23. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by xThinkx · · Score: 1

      Jeebus that stuff is off

      I'm 6'0" 170 and an avid rock climber. I play ultimate daily for exercise and run if I can't play ultimate. Every ounce counts when you're hoisting it up a wall, so excess fat is a no-no. Some of the best climbers in the NE climb at my gym, and most of those guys have pretty much NO body fat, some have levels so low that doctors say it's "unhealthy", and they would be considered overweight to obese on these scales.

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
    24. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by websaber · · Score: 1
      "A device that produces electricity from blood could be used to turn people into "human batteries"."

      AHHHHH Am I the only one who saw the Matrix??? It's happening just like the prophecy said!!!! :)

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    25. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the huge boob implants.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so synical(sp?). Just remember with Technology advancing so fast stupid people still need to have a job too.

    27. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Don't be so synical(sp?).

      FYI, Cynical. Close.

    28. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by tundog · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but why not an embedded IC that senses glucose levels and then uses up enough so that your balanced again? Then, you WOULD have to eat a lot of junk food, becuase this kind of system can only use up glucose, it can't create it.

      --
      All your base are belong to us!
    29. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by arn0n · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess the Wachowski brothers have beaten us to it, imagining a beowulf cluster of those...

      All that is left to say is that in Soviet Russia, device is powered by borscht!

    30. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow according the "this" my bmi is 29.8, im oh so close to becomming obiest!

      but if i look at my self, i am a couple pound on the heavy side... but not really that much.

      infact if i tryed like hell to loose 35 pounds so im on the verge of being in normal shape >25 bmi, then i would look like shit i think.. i would probably loose alot of muscel mass.

      i think there is somthing wrong when somone who is obiest needs a computer to tell them (or a simple set of calculations)... but then again i needed a computer to tell me im obiest!... even though i still dont belive it.

      waiter!, i'll get a poutine with extra gavey please.

    31. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      You laugh, but why not an embedded IC that senses glucose levels and then uses up enough so that your balanced again?

      I was half-laughing and half-serious. This would be WONDERFUL for me, and I'm not really diabetic. For my Dad (who is diabetic) it would be even better.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    32. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've read through some of the comments, and I have seen jokes refering to diabetes, but no serious comments. I'm personally a little disappointed. I have a friend who's lived with diabetes through most of her life, and it is NOT FUN!

      I can't count the times when she's passed out from too much or too little sugar in her blood. I can't even count the number of times she's told me how she's laid back in bed having a reaction, not doing anything about it because she just wants the nightmare over with. Luckily, she has a family that cares too enough for her to not let her do that. A device that would efficiently control the glucose levels, without daily and usually unreliable amounts of insuline injections, would be a godsend for her. Diabetes isn't just some disease that you can live with and not worry. For people with the disease, it literally is a daily struggle. They find ways to live with it, but they can't lead a normal life. She has blood clots in her eyes from the sugar build up. Wounds take about twice as long to heal on her. She's lost teeth because they are rotting from the inside. She's been told by doctors that she will be lucky to make it to 50. A lot of people think that "oh you just need to take a shot every once in a while. What's so bad about that?" Unless you have the disease, or know someone who does, you can never really know the horrors it brings.

      Forget human batteries. Lets start focusing on real life-saving applications.

    33. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

      The big pun is that they cancelled Futurama. FOX Bastards. Another good reason to drink...

      --


      --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
    34. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      Why not just add a new extractor to get methane from your buttstream?

    35. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yet, but if the implants could convert fat to energy, and maybe redistribute some fat, it could be just a matter of time.

    36. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Ya, the BMI thing really seems to be a load of bull. Last time I looked at it, I was supposed to be somewhere in the 180 range, or so, don't remeber exactly at the moment and currently I stand 6'3". Now, on the other hand, I've had a skin fold test which put me as having too much fat, (pushing 20%) which I believe, but if you worked the numbers about 220 pounds of me was bone and muscle. Now, in order to get down to this magical BMI thingy, I would not only have to shed every ounce of fat on my body, which might be ok, but I tend to believe that having a little is healthy, but I would also have to drop 40 pounds of muscle, which I am quite sure is not healthy.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    37. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by pyrote · · Score: 1

      watch movies in the palms of our hands on a flexible OLED screen.

      heh ya right, OLED's won't be out in palms by then!

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    38. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      complex carbohydrates != glucose

      No, but what do you think complex carbohydrates become when they've been broken down by the digestive process ... wait for it ... glucose! So, by the time that potato salad is digested, and makes it into the blood, all that starch has been turned into glucose.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    39. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by BullSnot · · Score: 1

      "Forget human batteries. Lets start focusing on real life-saving applications."
      The human batteries discussed in the article would be perfect for treatind aliments such as (and expecially) diabetes. Think about it, a blood glucose meter could be implanted inside your body and be powered by the very glucose that it's monitoring.
      Major benifits of this could be more frequent readings, possibly automated injections(insulin), and better reasearch of the desease. It would need an RF transceiver (luckily the human body also makes a great antenna) to communicate w/ an implanted insulin delivery system, or a necklace, watch or something that tells you when and how much insulin you need.
      On a more personal note, this could also power the projectors i want implanted into my eyes that mount just above the inside of my pupil and project directly to my retina. Oh, yeah and it could probally help w/ cancer and bloodpressure and other stuff like that... But the eye implants would be so sweet, stereoscopic Quake4 on the bus ride to work, nice.

    40. Re:Some Interesting New Products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat healthy, monitor your blood sugar, and take your insulin. The eat healthy part is crutial. With the right diet and a bit of exercise, one can dramatically reduce the amount of insulin required.

      Problem being, people are too stuborn, too apathetic, or too damn lazy to take care of this cronic illness. Eating big macs, sipping cokes, and downing ice cream then dumping on the synthetics is no way to treat your body.

      How do I know? I manage just fine with my Type 1 through diet, exercise, and due diligence with my insulin.

  2. Two cows by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny
    Leave it to the Japanese to find a way to create usefulness and efficiency out of anything.

    Two cows:

    JAPANESE CORPORATION
    You have two cows.
    You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk. You then create clever cow cartoon images called Cowikimon and market them worldwide.

    1. Re:Two cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      AMERICAN CORPORATION
      You have two cows.
      You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the band, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. Sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States, leaving you with nine cows. No balance sheet provided with the release. The public buys your bull.

    2. Re:Two cows by drcrja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you have two cows, sell one and buy a bull.

    3. Re:Two cows by afidel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is actually REALLY funny =)
      I can't stand bad moderators.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Two cows by BarryHaworth · · Score: 5, Interesting
      More to the point, cows (and other animals) will most likely be the first widespread application of this technology. My cat already has an ID chip, but that is completely passive. With a blood battery behind it, I could add a GPS tracker and transmitter, thereby answering the question: what *does* that cat get up to during the day?

      With cows or other large animals, larger devices with more power would be possible. Perhaps a device to summon the cows for round up, or give them a shock if they stray out of bounds.

      I am a Statistician. One false move and you are a Statistic

      --
      I am a Statistician. One false move and you are a Statistic
    5. Re:Two cows by laejoh · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here in Belgium the joke ends with

      You have one cow

      You marry her!

    6. Re:Two cows by gurisees · · Score: 1

      With cows or other large animals, larger devices with more power would be possible

      But who wants to play pinball on a cow anyway?

      --
      ... information wants to be forwarded ...
    7. Re:Two cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest thing I've read since Gary Larson stopped doing Far Side!

    8. Re:Two cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Cow milks you

    9. Re:Two cows by OrangeTrafficCone · · Score: 1

      This gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "server farm"...

    10. Re:Two cows by WeblionX · · Score: 0

      Why not, they put a webserver in a fly?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    11. Re:Two cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are brilliant. I wish you could get the points for that.

      Thanks for the laugh brother. :)

    12. Re:Two cows by cfuse · · Score: 1
      With cows or other large animals, larger devices with more power would be possible. Perhaps a device to summon the cows for round up, or give them a shock if they stray out of bounds.

      Stuff that, use it with GPS in humans for home detention.

      How 'bout in drug rehab - if the device detects the drug it shocks the fuck out of the user.

      Or school kids, not in school? zap, buzz, crackle!

  3. Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
    Headphones on, he sits at the back of the bus. His mind filled with the music he loves as the tape slowly comes to an unexpected halt:

    "'Cause I'm as freeee aaaaasssssss aaaaaaaaaa biiiiiiirrrrrrrrr nnnnnn." -Klick!

    Callously, he eyeballs the passanger next to him. He thinks, "Kinda short, but chubby... About 11 Pints."

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by BrynM · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dammit! Now I've got "Free Bird" stuck in my head. Self-torture. Arrgh! Make it go away!

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "'Cause I'm as freeee aaaaasssssss aaaaaaaaaa biiiiiiirrrrrrrrr nnnnnn." -Klick!


      You know you're a KDE user when you spell "Click" with a K.
    3. Re:Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You know you're a KDE user when you spell "Click" with a K.

      That, or German.

    4. Re:Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 pints? Holy shit. Is he a freakin' land barge, or is this one of these fucked up Japanimes where people spurt geysers of blood when they get stabbed, because that'd be pretty freakin' cool.

    5. Re:Riding the bus gets more dangerous... by BrynM · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm a Californian (USA) with a friend named Karl. Since meeting him, I see everything with a 'K' instead of a 'C'.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  4. The Matrix by amerinese · · Score: 2, Funny

    has you.

    1. Re:The Matrix by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

      Ugh....nothing.....it's just, my computer....it told me that if I gave it some blood, it would run 1Ghz faster. Whoa.

    2. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think outside the box!

      How about a Black 1982 Firebird that just so happens to have a California license plate that reads "KNIGHT".

      I swear that thing was human. :)

  5. Glucose = sugar! by acomj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This actually is kinda neat. If it can run on glucose it probably can run on fructose/sucrose/lactose and a lot of other sugars..

    This of course brings back bad memories of Biology and the "Citric acid Cycle" and ATP..

    1. Re:Glucose = sugar! by ragingmime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and it probably could be used on things other than blood, right? Does that mean that you could actually run a laptop on a can of cola? In all seriousness, if the technology gets more efficient (by a lot) this might have some interesting implications for cheap fuel cells.

      --
      I produce electronic music and write little games. Have a look.
    2. Re:Glucose = sugar! by gantrep · · Score: 1

      And PGAL, RuBP, and the krebs cycle. Yes I feel your pain. Except I'd be willing to bet 5 dollars my biology class was much much more tedious and patronizing than yours. "OK boys and girls, polymers are like these legos stuck together, and monomers are like the blocks!" *click* *click* *click* of plastic.... We spent months on punnett squares, really. An entire academic quarter.

    3. Re:Glucose = sugar! by BrainInAJar · · Score: 4, Informative

      "If it can run on glucose it probably can run on fructose/sucrose/lactose "

      Probably not. Your body doesn't burn fructose specifically, it converts it to glucose first. Sucrose is a fructose molecule + a glucose molecule, so it'd have to be broken apart and the fructose converted. Your body does this all automatically, but then the point is moot, since it can (technically) run off starch as well, starch just being a polysacharide of glucose.

      So in your body = okay, dumping the nanomachines into a vat of fructose wouldn't work.

    4. Re:Glucose = sugar! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      High school right? Please tell me this wasn't a college chemistry class. I had a project in high school chem, we had to construct a dodecahedron out of paper and write a property of a given element on each side. This was insulting. I told the teacher this project was far too elementary for high school students, she thought it was a joke. Awful.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Glucose = sugar! by gantrep · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep high school. The class was quite insulting. That was sophomore year. I had chemistry for the next two years, and that teacher was the best teacher I've ever had and the class was challenging. I scored a 4 on the AP chem exam after that, which was high enough that I didn't have to take a year of chem in college that I otherwise would have. And I was not a good student in that class. I rarely read the material. His excellent lectures and labs and problems were enough. His tests were far harder than the AP exam.

      My biology teacher did not respect us. She put up overheads of notes and insisted we copy them all down. I tried telling her that I don't need to because I've never looked at them and never had below a 95% in her class, but she wouldn't hear any of that.

      My chem teacher was the opposite of patronizing. He really respected us, and he pushed us a lot. He managed to use excellent analogies that let us understand without simplifying or glossing things over. He didn't sugarcoat anything. Far from it. In fact, he frequently would yell things like "The bomb hits friday, and you're all gonna be shrapnel" in reference to an upcoming test, and that that light we think we see at the end of the tunnel is a train. Not that he was cruel or would leave anyone behind, he would ALWAYS help you if you came in and had read the material but didn't understand, and if the whole class was unprepared, he would delay tests. He made chemistry hard, fun and extremely interesting. The public school system needs more teachers like him.

    6. Re:Glucose = sugar! by rew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read the article but I don't know what power levels they achieved: "only very low power levels".

      But current implants are designed to last a couple of years on the provided batteries. So they can't use very much power.

      My 1980 watch used 0.35 microwatts. The battery lasted around a year. I expect implants to use around that level of power (0.5 to 2 times the power, with a 1x to 4x larger battery).... So if the device can be made to provide around that level of power, an implant might not require the operation to replace the battery every 2-3 years.

      On the other hand, the electrodes doing the electron exchange with the glucose might not last that long.... That would defeat the whole idea...

      Roger.

    7. Re:Glucose = sugar! by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      This of course brings back bad memories of Biology and the "Citric acid Cycle" and ATP..


      Ah, yes. Discovered by a famous beatnik, and thus named...

      ...the Maynard G. Krebs cycle.

      (Sorry.)

    8. Re:Glucose = sugar! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > run off starch as well, starch just being a polysacharide of glucose.

      Hmm, interesting. So since a potato is a lot of starch, what is the difference between this idea & making a potato battery? Just the medium, or is it an entirely different concept?

    9. Re:Glucose = sugar! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, the potato battery is because of the alkali in it, or something like that.

      Basically, the same context as a normal battery. Not much to do with the starch, really.

      Forgive me, it's been years since I've bothered retaining information on batteries. I've been too busy sucking career oriented information =)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    10. Re:Glucose = sugar! by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      that has to do with the acid/base in a potato, not the starch energy. What this is more akin to would be burning a potato in an extremely controlled, microscopic level

  6. Rusty Glucose by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dr Kazuo Eda, heading the research, said: "It is like the metabolism of food. Human bodies can process glucose and obtain energy. When glucose is oxidised, electrons can be obtained."

    IANAB (I am not a biologist), but if the process our bodies use is different from how this devices creates electricity, isn't there a different waste product? Or can our bodies still use rusty glucose? Or is oxidized glucose harmless waste?

    I guess we just need to combine this technology with a form of fusion, and we're really in for it. Now drink your power aid.

    Mirror

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Rusty Glucose by groove10 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not a biochemist either, but this website shows the basic Glycolysis reactions and their output.

      Basically, in this process Glucose + ATP is broken down into glucose-6-phosphate + ADP, giving off a net reaction of energy.

      Without knowing the the reactions in the process that Dr. Eda et. al. have developed, I can only guess that the oxidized glucose will combine with the some other ions (such as a phosphate) and become waste products just liek any other in the body. I'm not really sure what happens to the glucose-6-phosphatea after Glycolysis.

      --
      MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
    2. Re:Rusty Glucose by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called "piss."

      You can buy it in concentrated powder form at your local garden store, or apply it to your plants directly.

      KFG

    3. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      if the process our bodies use is different from how this devices creates electricity, isn't there a different waste product?

      Oh great, so will I need to clean up computer poop all over the house now?

    4. Re:Rusty Glucose by The_Spud · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually the reaction you describe is not very efficient and only gives a net gain of 2 ATP ( adenosine tri phosphate)per glucose molecule which the bodies tissues use for energy.

      Glucose + 2 ADP + 2 NAD+ + 2 Pi -----> 2 Pyruvate + 2 ATP + 2 NADH + 2 H+

      Most of the bodies energy is generated by the Krebs ( Citric Acid ) cycle in the mitochondria which generates much more ATP. The glucose-6-phosphate gets converted to pyruvate and enters the krebs cycle. show here This give a net gain of 30 moles atp per 2 moles of pyruvate.

      Incidently if you have sugar by products in your urine you should see your doc as you might have diabetes.

    5. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Glycolysis is anaerobic (does not use oxygen, but produces harmful byproducts like lactic acid) and isn't what these scientists are doing.

    6. Re:Rusty Glucose by caouchouc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your body produces the bulk of its energy by converting glucose to ATP by a process known as chemiosmosis (electron transport). It takes advantage of the loosly-bound electrons in glucose, and at one point during the reaction the electrons flow along the inner membranes of your cells' mitochondria.

      The process the researchers have come up with probably uses the same effect to produce a current. The waste product? Urine. The same thing you'd produce if you metabolized the glucose yourself.

    7. Re:Rusty Glucose by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      I ain't a biologist either, but "oxidise" means it consumes oxygen, right? What do you breathe again?

      I'm sure the good scientist wouldn't be proposing putting these things in your body if they were going to poison you, and I think he may be a biologist.

      (Aside: if you let metal rust really fast, do you know what happens? Yes, it burns. Just like wood or gasoline burn, or you burn energy (sugar). In fact, burning metal releases so much energy that aluminum is a primary component of the solid fuel boosters the space shuttle uses.)

    8. Re:Rusty Glucose by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oxidation? Yes, actually really nasty stuff is produced:

      2 C2H6O6 + O2 -> 4CO2 + 6H2O

      That CO2 could suffocate you, and H2O is harmful by inhalation and is found in all known cancers!

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    9. Re:Rusty Glucose by blowhole · · Score: 1
      I ain't a biologist either, but "oxidise" means it consumes oxygen, right? What do you breathe again?


      IANABiologistOrChemist, but your rationalization seems quite naive, at best.

      Firstly, "oxidized" doesn't necessarily have to do with oxygen at all. I think it refers to the removal of electrons and the resultant "positive" state.

      Secondly, even if it did have something to do with oxygen, that doesn't mean it's innocuous. Oxygen is present in a lot of things that we wouldn't want in our bodies... like carbon monoxide, ozone, and dihydrogen monoxide(!!!).
      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    10. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, "oxidized" doesn't necessarily have to do with oxygen at all. I think it refers to the removal of electrons and the resultant "positive" state.

      It's called reduction when oxygen is not involved.

      Oxygen just happens to be such a common reactant that we called the process "oxidation" before we fully understood what was happening. The name stuck for oxygen-related reduction.

      All oxidation is reduction, but not all reduction is oxidation.

      IANABiologistOrChemist, but your rationalization seems quite naive, at best.

      You probably should have stopped at "IANABoC" there. :)

      Oxygen is present in a lot of things that we wouldn't want in our bodies... like carbon monoxide, ozone, and dihydrogen monoxide(!!!).

      I know I wouldn't want a big dose of NaOH in my bloodstream. Ouch.

    11. Re:Rusty Glucose by weiyuent · · Score: 2, Informative

      The process the researchers have come up with probably uses the same effect to produce a current. The waste product? Urine. The same thing you'd produce if you metabolized the glucose yourself.

      The primary waste product of cellular respiration is carbon dioxide, not urine. Urine consists of everything else that your body discards (mostly urea from the breakdown of amino acids).

    12. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably from the ATP in the reaction... actually, what exactly would free ATP do in the bloodstream?

    13. Re:Rusty Glucose by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      For the record

      glucode + ADP -> glucose-6-phosphate + ATP

      (obviously, since ATP is what powers your cells)

    14. Re:Rusty Glucose by Effika · · Score: 1

      Somebody better mod you up as funny. :-)

    15. Re:Rusty Glucose by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Who taught you science?

      Reduction is the opposite of oxidation. When one thing gets oxidised, something else gets reduced.

      Classical definition: oxidation = addition of oxygen, reduction = removal of oxygen.
      Modern definition, since we've discovered that oxygen is not the only oxidising agent: oxidation = loss of bonding electrons, reduction = gain of bonding electrons.

      For instance, in sulphur dioxide, the sulphur has an oxidation state of IV. SO2 can bond with an O-- ion to give SO3-- {still oxidation state IV so far - there are six bonds with the oxygen, but there are two extra electrons making the -- ion} or be further oxidised to SO3 {now oxidation state VI} which can bond with O-- to give the familiar SO4-- ion. If the SO3-- ion were to lose two electrons and become sulphur trioxide SO3, it would have increased its oxidation state to VI. Remember: Oil Rig - Oxidation Is Loss, Reduction Is Gain.

      Anyway, back to the point, getting energy from glucose is nothing new. You can get energy from glucose by setting fire to it. Fag-ash makes a good catalyst for lighting it; no idea which of the very many chemicals it contains the actual substance is that does the business, though. What is even less remarkable is that if you measure the energy that comes from burning a known amount of glucose to produce known amounts of CO2 and H2O, you will find it equal to the amount of energy that your body can extract from that glucose. Somebody called Hess actually managed to get this law named after themself, even though it should have been obvious that anything else would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    16. Re:Rusty Glucose by Fweeky · · Score: 1
      Incidently if you have sugar by products in your urine you should see your doc as you might have diabetes.

      Uh... right, so how are you supposed to know that? :)
    17. Re:Rusty Glucose by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      Tell your kids it's Koolaid and see what they have to say about it.

      --
      --- What
    18. Re:Rusty Glucose by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I think my body is already contaminated by large levels of dihydrogen monoxide.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    19. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rusty Glucose would be a great name for a band.

    20. Re:Rusty Glucose by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Pee in a bowl and leave it outside.

      Flies will come if there is sugar in it. (I suppose other stuff like ants and wasps too.)

      Ancient Greeks used this technique to diagnose diabetes.

    21. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The primary waste product of cellular respiration is carbon dioxide, not urine. Urine consists of everything else that your body discards (mostly urea from the breakdown of amino acids).

      But what is in my poopy?

    22. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somebody called Hess actually managed to get this law named after themself, even though it should have been obvious that anything else would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.

      Just guessing here, but if Hess came up with this before thermodynamics, he probably wouldn't lose his law, even if just out of habit of people using it.

    23. Re:Rusty Glucose by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      H2O is harmful by inhalation and is found in all known cancers!
      No, it's that really nasty stuff: 2H3O that you're thinking of.

      --

    24. Re:Rusty Glucose by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Pee in a bowl and leave it outside.
      > Flies will come if there is sugar in it.

      And any women present in your life will fly away.

    25. Re:Rusty Glucose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that reaction uses energy. It's a preparatory step; the glucose is phosphorylated (a phosphate taken off ATP and added to the glucose) prior to the actual breakdown of the glucose into pyruvate. That step yields only a few ADP->ATP reactions (the main energy source in most Earth organisms) per glucose molecule. The next two steps, citric acid cycle (formerly Krebs cycle) and electron transport, further break down the pyruvate into carbon dioxide and much more ATP. Unfortunately that step requires oxygen. Without enough oxygen the pyruvate builds up, gets converted to lactic acid, and you "feel the burn". Certain microbes will convert the pyruvate to ethanol instead, a process for which many of us are thankful :)

      I haven't read the article yet, so don't know what the machine does with the glucose. But pretty much anything that it can be decomposed into, the body is accustomed to processing, so it's probably not a problem.

      Yes, I am a biochemist, but it's been years since I used my 5ki11z so add salt to taste.

    26. Re:Rusty Glucose by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Your food after it's been processed.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    27. Re:Rusty Glucose by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Uh... right, so how are you supposed to know that?

      With these.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    28. Re:Rusty Glucose by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Incidently if you have sugar by products in your urine you should see your doc as you might have diabetes.

      Since most people don't test their own urine for sugar, then how would they know?

      Unless they drink their own piss, in which case you really need to see a doctor.

    29. Re:Rusty Glucose by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      But what is in my poopy?

      Everything that your gut wasn't able to digest(especially cellulose a.k.a. fibre).

  7. The obvious comment by southpolesammy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And so the Matrix is born.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  8. Seems a little inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably much cheaper just to run it from regular glucose.

  9. In other news.... by dracken · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a bunch of scientists made a realistic virtual world which could be powered by humans hooked on to devices that could produce electricity from the human body. And in other news....agents are looking for a couple of anarchists called morpheus and neo.

    ducks :P

  10. Nuts by double-oh+three · · Score: 0

    1st we have batteries, which allow us to walk around with electrics. Then we have a invention to exploit enegry from the human body. I seriously have to wonder how long it will be before a dictator starts tieing down people and getting them to produce energy for him. Would be a whole new way to tourture people to death, because they would die from being to tired to do anything.

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  11. Matrix? by computerme · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So "The Matrix" was a documentary??!?

    1. Re:Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

    2. Re:Matrix? by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 4, Funny

      So "The Matrix" was a documentary??!?

      Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony.

      --
      Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
  12. some interesting applications by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Self powered diabetes control systems. You can use the excess glucose into power, and when the level is too low, it can release a reserve of glucose.
    • Weight loss implants. Eat all the chocolate you like, and then use it to start your car.
    1. Re:some interesting applications by BrynM · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My sister could probably kiss you for that diabetes idea! That would let her do a lot of things, like hike Europe, without having to worry about her glucose meter running out of batteries somehwere remote or whether she could get more insulin should the need arise (I'm not sure if the storage idea would work though, as insulin can be complex to store/reproduce). I realize that she may never see it in that much of a normal use during her lifetime, but the idea that it could work would certainly ease her worry about passing it on to offspring. It will certainly give her some hope for other diabetics.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:some interesting applications by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does your sister know that you're offering her to random Slashdot nerds?

      --
      ...
    3. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diabetic studies have progressed a lot in the last few years.

      I could be wrong, but the NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine) had a study about last resort islet transplants for type I diabetics, I think. I've long forgotten the details (I was in medicine, I left). If I recall, it worked; there were minimal rejections, blood glucose was within normal ranges, self-maintained. Obviously, with a study, it was more short-term, and very limited (7 patients I think).

      Obviously, there are issues--e.g. requires surgery, requires probably some immunosuppression, so it's not a complete replacement. It's another direction, another piece of the puzzle, but not sheer independence from Rx's.

    4. Re:some interesting applications by Angstroem · · Score: 1
      Weight loss implants. Eat all the chocolate you like, and then use it to start your car.

      With weather like this I'd also go for a built-in air condition...

      I can already see the modified Subway slogan: "Eat fresh -- stay cool."

    5. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sister could hike her skirt instead and then climb my love pole if she wants some safe exercise closer to emergency medical assistance.

    6. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it enough power to run a wireless ethernet card? Now I can publish all my body stats on the web.

      Maybe we need an XML DTD to say I've fallen and I can't get up.

    7. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, why are you worrying about Diabetes? It'll be gone in the next 15 years. Like smallpox, the plague, and assorted other diseases that used to kill us off.

      here's the link.
      www.diabetes.org.uk/islets/trans/edmonton.h tm

    8. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not only that, but check out who he's offering her to, a user named "www.sorehands.com". Wonder why his hands are sore? I almost feel sorry for this guys sister.

    9. Re:some interesting applications by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Man, I'm on fire today. Check out my comment history! I should go into standup comedy.

      --
      ...
    10. Re:some interesting applications by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I do too, diabetes sucks.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:some interesting applications by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      Especially as there are soooo many places in Europe where batteries still have to be invented. Not to mention the total absence of anything remotely resembling a hospital.... FYI: the worlds largest producer of insulin has its headquarters in denmark...

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    12. Re:some interesting applications by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

      Especially to a guy who's name is sorehands.com?

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    13. Re:some interesting applications by PeterPanic · · Score: 1

      I bet the first application will be doping of athletes. During training phase: Insert little machines which "eat" your glucose to get the body to produce more.
      Now you must just get rid of the stuff a few days before the race and your glucose levels should be way up for that extra boost...
      Kinda like training in the mountains to get the red (or was it white?) bloodcell levels up.

    14. Re:some interesting applications by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      nicely done

    15. Re:some interesting applications by paxil · · Score: 1

      Good point. Somewhat more realisticaly, if this device had any sort of longevity, it could be used as an implantable glucose sensor. With that, one could make a closed loop insulin pump. There exist pumps now, of course, but their control is open loop, total crap compared to what one could do if they had a glucose sensor.

    16. Re:some interesting applications by ddimas · · Score: 1

      I don't know why your post was labeled funny. Those are actually good ideas (except the start your car part). I think the primary use of this device will be to power biomedical devices implanted in the human body. Start thinking about how to power a set of artificial legs on about 20 watts.

    17. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this idea could not be used as a replacement for insulin for diabetics. Simplistically, insulin is the mechanism by which glucose passes into cells. A machine that simply used the glucose in blood for power would not serve the fundamental purpose of insulin, which is to allow energy into cells. The only benefit to a diabetic would be to supplement insulin as a means of controlling the absolute level of glucose in the blood without the accompanying problem of obesity.

    18. Re:some interesting applications by chialea · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried about getting a perscription for it and for the syringes, especially somewhere I didn't speak the language...

      Lea

    19. Re:some interesting applications by cactopus · · Score: 1

      The diabetic idea is good... the weight one stupid. Weight issues are caused by a lot more than blood sugar levels...

      I think the ideal application is an electronic pancreas. It uses the power generated to monitor blood sugar levels internally and power pumps and scrubbers to take in what it needs to scrub the blood when needed. You supplement your sugar by eating more when levels fall too low. It could be tuned to function in the same manner as a human pancreas

    20. Re:some interesting applications by BrynM · · Score: 1
      "My sister could probably kiss you"

      Damn, some /.ers are sick bastards. Just the thought that my sister *could* *probably* kiss some guy and a bunch of us get all hot and bothered. Guys, there are real women out there. Go meet one. I doubt she'd talk to you if this is how depraved you are, but at least you could fantasize about more than a text possibility...

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    21. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Self powered diabetes control systems. You can use the excess glucose into power, and when the level is too low, it can release a reserve of glucose.

      Wrong. You'd be keeping the blood sugar levels at a "healthy" level, sure, but without insulin (or if the person taking insulin got sloppy because, hey, the control system will take care of it, right?), the body will be forced to burn fat for energy. Too much of this, and ketoacidosis starts.

      Then you die.

      Diabetic comas and diabetic deaths are the result of ketoacidosis, not of high blood sugar levels. Your idea would illustrate this fact nicely...

      Andrew Klaassen

    22. Re:some interesting applications by k2r · · Score: 1

      > like hike Europe, without having to worry about her
      > glucose meter running out of batteries somehwere
      > remote or whether she could get more insulin should
      > the need arise

      It's not like we didn't have batteries over here, neither we have to shoot diabetics because we do not know about insuline yet.

      You might be amazed, we even have public health care in some countries...

      Hiking Europe should be no bigger problem than hiking US.

      k2r

    23. Re:some interesting applications by BrynM · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that Europe is uncivilized. Hiking in a foreign land takes a certain measure of preparation and precaution, especially if you plan to hike through wilderness. Being diabetic further complicates that planning - Fumbling through language, having your sense of direction thrown off, not knowing what foreign road markers mean - these can lead to lost time that could cost her life itself.

      I could have said "hike the continental US", but she has no desire to do that (and I don't blame her). She wants to see your land because she admires you. Take that for the compliment that it is.

      It is nice to know that you won't be shooting at her because she is diabetic. You should shoot the mimes though...

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    24. Re:some interesting applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a manjuice-swallowing faggot boy.

    25. Re:some interesting applications by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Self powered diabetes control systems. You can use the excess glucose into power, and when the level is too low, it can release a reserve of glucose.

      I like the idea of combining diabetes treatment with a built in tazer. Glucose -> zap! Don't fuck with me man, I've got diabetes!

  13. The Matrix is just a movie by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Computers can never be as smart as humans because of the simple fact that humans have souls which allow a creative nature. Computers cannot be programmed to have souls. They can perhaps be programmed to have weighted levels of preference for certain things, but they can never appreciate things at the level that we humans can.

    Despite what fear-mongers like Bill Joy say about computers achieving then surpassing humans in intelligence, just consider that intelligence isn't a matter of MIPS, but one of creativity and the ability to think outside of the box. These are things computers can't do, and will never be able to do.

    1. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by double-oh+three · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We can't program a soul yet. Talk to a man 200 years ago and see if he would belive that flying is a regular thing for us.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    2. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What is a soul? Is there any scientific way to define it? Can this theory be tested, verified, and replicated? If it is non-existant, then what good is it in any real scientific (I.E. logical) debate and/or arguement?

      Is creativity nothing more then a very basic function of an advanced brain? If we can develop such analytical adept brains, why can't another organism given time? Why can't we create one?

      Even certain birds can solve puzzles using techniques that researchers never included in the equation. Nothing suggests that the human brain can accomplish tasks that we could never program a computer to do. The ideal of a "soul" is actually fable/fiction/pure speculation, and does not deserve to be included in a scientific debate.

      Just my two cents.

    3. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by rivaldufus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Computers can nerver be as smart as humans because of the simple fact that humans have souls...

      I take it you've never worked with sales people....

    4. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son.. are you up there..

      put that filthy computer down and come and have the hourly family prayer, uncle jim cousin fhqwgads, neices lisa and marmalade are all here and already started praising the lord.

      come on down at once unless you wish to roast your soul in the fires of lucifer....

    5. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by dustman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was an interesting article on genetic algorithms in popular science or popular mechanics a few years ago (circa 1998 or so I think).

      Anyway, the specific application being developed was designing an FPGA circuit to detect whether or not a tone (of a specific frequency) was being played. Genetic algorithms were being used to "evolve" circuit designs on a computer, then upload them to the FPGA.

      It ended up being the case that the final design used far less gates than any human could reasonably design. And, none of the human EE's could understand how it was done at first.

      After analysis, it was shown that the evolved design was using subtle interplay between different parts, and that analog effects from gates next to each other were affecting the results, etc... - all things that an engineer would not consider. (In fact, not even a good thing to consider because it wouldn't work on other FPGAs, even of the same model number, because of the subtleties of the analog interaction).

      But, the point is that the problem was solved by a computer program, in a much more efficient (and certainly, "creative" and "outside the box") way than humans would.

      Also, note that the humans couldn't understand at first (and took quite some time to understand) a relatively uncomplex system (a few handfuls of logic gates)...

      If we assemble systems with orders of magnitude more complexity (millions of gates), operating in similiar ways, there is no way a human will understand it. At this point, it will "come up with" solutions to problems, and there will be no way for a human to understand how it is coming up with these.

      At that point, how could you argue that the systems (computer vs human mind) were different, or that one were better than the other, if they were each solving obscure problems, and we didn't understand either?

    6. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you fail to realize is that a human(soul) will be able to join with a computer, eventually shedding the organic body. In such a way, computers could have souls.

      neural interface research has shown this to be a possibility.

    7. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we are never going to know whether an AI has a 'soul', as you call it. Awareness is what I would call it. I don't even know that you have it. I know there is something going on behind MY eyes, but why couldn't you be just a complicated toaster? The essence of the problem is like this: you can program the simplest computer to scream. You can even program it to scream only when you hit it. But of course that doesn't mean that it feels pain. (Nor the reverse... maybe it felt pain all along but just couldn't speak up!) This is called the 'Zombie Problem' in philosophy. I.E., how do I know that your are not a zombie? I don't.

    8. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by MagPulse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are arguing that the brain is more than the sum of its synapses. This is one of the core questions in the fields of psychology and AI, and is being pursued by the top minds in each field. We will probably not know the answer until we can simulate the human brain and see what happens.

      To back up your argument, you should probably know what the soul is and how it interacts with the physical brain, otherwise how can you say it's not a behavior of the brain?

    9. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to reply to this with some tasteful pondering and asking deep-retorical questions like, "What is a soul, really?"
      I'm just gunna say, "What a stupid post, I'd moderate you down into the hell which represents your orthodox religion of I could..."

    10. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Valar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ever heard of Cybernetic Poet? Or any of the music composing artificial intelligences? They regularly produce art which human judges mistake for man-made. Sure, it's not 100% indistiguishable yet, but it appears that with more processing power comes more 'correct' output. You are showing your carbon-bias. Your brain is really no more than a neural net itself (ok, it might have some quantum computing ability,but that is far from accepted fact). It just happens to be more powerful than artificial neural nets we can put together now. And, did you know (speaking of souls) that there is an area of the brain, that when stimulated electrically, causes the person in question to feel like they are having a religious experience? This goes a long way to say that artificial intelligences might well be able to experience the same things we do, if made sufficiently complicated.

    11. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      who slips into my robot body and whispers to my ghost?

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    12. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Soul is to humans as software is to computers, or waves to water.

      We already know how to create the last two and - wait a minute - we know how to create souls too !

    13. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      consider this. We can (theoretically) model a entire cell in action although it takes a very very very large amount of processing power (the video about the CRAY X-1's has a guy talking about his dream is to be able to model an entire cell and petaflop supercomputers would probably allow this). The brain is made up of cells. Theoretically by moodeling every single cell in the entire human brain it should be possible to recreate a human-like intelligence level. (there are some obvious limitations to this). Note that we can't even model a single cell yet (the brain is comprised of many many many cells (billions?)), let alone in real time.

      This is all 'theory' of course but I think while perhaps the most accurate way to approach the problem, it also is more than likely the slowest. Also, from my *limited* understanding of the human body I gather we know not even close to enough to accurately model a human braing given infinite resources (memory, manpower, processing speed, whatever else i can't think of).

      My point being is artificial intelligence on the mammal (or more specifically human) scale isn't something as unaproachable as you would like to think. If we don't annihlate ourselves in the next thousand years (I wonder if they said that a thousand years ago?) I imagine that significant strides will have been made towards human level A.I. despite protests/laws barring such research.

      Don't take me the wrong way, I fully agree with you that processing speed probably isn't the most prominent thing barring us from recreating human-like intelligence but it's certainly up there (right underneath our general lack of knowledge as to how the brain operates).

    14. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by CracktownHts · · Score: 1
      I know there is something going on behind MY eyes, but why couldn't you be just a complicated toaster?

      I once had a girlfriend... (waits for laughter to subside)

      I once had a girlfriend who made me ponder this question every day. I'd gaze deep into its brown eyes and think to myself, "this toaster is pretty complicated, but there's must be something wrong because it screams even when I'm not hitting it."

    15. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Knife_Edge · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Have you ever heard of Cybernetic Poet? Or any of the music composing artificial intelligences? They regularly produce art which human judges mistake for man-made. Sure, it's not 100% indistiguishable yet...

      Yes, but both of these simulations work using patterns that were derived by analysis of existing works, which by definition always happens after the real creation already took place. Therefore nothing the machines produce is remotely original, they were just programmed to produce something similar by humans, who used their real intelligence to identify patterns that could be codified into a form a machine could understand. People do this too, imitating musical styles of past composers, for example. So in this way machines can be made to be sort of like people, producing new outputs from a fixed set of inputs, creating examples of rules.

      The real problem arises in simulating truly creative human activities - for example the creation of an entirely new method of composing music that did not previously exist. Maybe it is an extension of something that existed before, or a synthesis of disparate elements. How do people do things like this? Much of it is based on intuition, interpreting their sensory experiences, and then creating something new. All this is difficult to define in terms of a machine. Even worse is the question, why do people do this? What motivates them? You have to simulate both the how and the why to create a truly creative entity. The machine must be able to create new sets of rules for itself, and must do so not arbitrarily, but for a reason. Aha, you say. The ability and motivation to create new rules must be defined in a sort of meta-rule! Right, all you have to do is understand the operations of conscious thought. But there is a showstopper problem with that notion - you must understand conscious thought from within your own mind, in terms of your thoughts. I reason by analogy here, but isn't there a mathematical principle that says that many systems cannot be proved from within themselves?

      Otherwise, you get 'creative' machines as they are now, clever, highly trained parrots. Nothing more.

      I will proceed further from 'interesting' into 'making people angry', and inform you all that my opinion is that artificial intelligence that has the creative capacity of humans will never exist. This is because I believe humans were endowed with their creative capacity by their Creator, but not given enough analytical ability to understand their creative abilities well enough to truly replicate them. Maybe if you have the mind of God you can create the mind of a human, but how can you create the mind of God if you cannot even make the mind of a human? I guess this ties into the concept of a soul, the part of our experience that we are aware of, but unable to analyze from within our experience.

    16. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by TroyFoley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ideal of a "soul" is actually fable/fiction/pure speculation

      No, the reality you perceive is your own pure speculation. The fact that you percieve and speculate is incontrivertible proof of your soul/essential existance, proof available to you and no one else. This makes it subjective in any manifestation, and thus is, as you've stated, not subject to the objectivity of science. So you're half right, half wrong. Remember, I think therefor I am. A statement that hasn't been successfully debated since its conception.

      --
      After I have received the wisdom of good teaching, I will untiringly teach all people. - The Teachings of Buddha
    17. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ideal of a "soul" is actually fable/fiction/pure speculation, and does not deserve to be included in a scientific debate.

      I agree with all you had to say but that last part. Depending on how the soul is being defined, it does have it's rightly place in scientific debate. As self-awareness, consciousness, or personality, the soul is studied and even tested for in the field of psychology.

      Breaking a bit from what is conventionally considered science, philosophers debate the nature and existence of the soul to no end. While they have little to no physical phenomena to categorize and study, it would be incorrect to think that more often than not their methods are unscientific.

      Of course nothing can help support the idea of the soul as "that which makes humans special and unique in all the universe", other than some artless interpretations of the Bible.

      But "pure" science is not without its weaknesses. Take the creation of the universe for instance. How can the methodologies of science alone ever hope to explain the origin of the big bang, when the laws of physics may not have existed in the form that we know them, if at all? We can't simply expect science to explain everything eventually, or we've abandoned science and invented another faith to take it's place.

      "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." ~Albert Einstein

    18. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by BJH · · Score: 1

      Shit, I wish my philosophy professor had spent more time talking about zombies and less about "the meaning of being" and suchness.

    19. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why can't we create one?
      You see, there's this thing called sex, where...
    20. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by tshak · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is the assumption that sicence can explain everything that is, or that science can explain all truth. Science is a system that is a human creation to observe the things around us within our finite senses. You're correct that people can get very creative when it comes to the religious and "soul-searching" type discussions, but just as much as any scientists with his data based on finite measurements and sometime atrocious assumptions. Unfortunately weeding out the BS is not a trivial task. Narrowing the scope to "scientific debate" (unless specifically appropriate) is regularly trivializing the issue as it is not considering other relevant disciplines.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    21. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by cranos · · Score: 1

      Soul is to humans as software is to computers

      So now we know, MS just doesn't want to dominate the Computer world, they want our souls. I think I'll keep my customized kernel thank you very much, it tends to be able to communicate with a multitude of other systems, while MS souls just tend to be a bit simple.

    22. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by El · · Score: 1

      Given enough compute power, you could probably even brute force "creativity" and "thinking outside the box" e.g. by generating every possible idea, then selectively filtering out the usefull ones. In other words, given 1000 monkeys at a thousand typewriters for a thousand years, one of them would eventually patent 1-click online shopping.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    23. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by El · · Score: 1
      ...humans have souls...

      Do ALL humans have souls? Even (shudder) Darl McBride?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    24. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by DarkDigger · · Score: 0

      You just completely and eloquently summed up what I was thinking the entire time I was reading this thread. Thank you.

    25. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a soul?

      Well, the biblical definition would be something like "life" or "creature."

      Of course, that's not what most people mean when they say "soul," despite the fact that they think their definition comes from the Bible.

      Really, those who think we have some sort of spiritual "soul" should look into the mind-body problem.

      Randomly chosen link on the subject.

    26. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait a minute - we know how to create souls too !

      Boom chicky-chicky wow-wow!

    27. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've said it before and I'll say it again - if you plan to simulate the human brain, make sure you simulate the IO in a manner the simulation can access naturally. Nothing would suck more than being a fully functional simulation trapped in a deaf and dumb computer system.

      "I think, therefore I am" doesn't mean much if nobody else knows...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    28. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Simple facts are usually incorrect assumptions.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    29. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by CvD · · Score: 1

      Very nice example. This is why I think genetic/evolutionary algorithms are so interesting and will definately be used a lot more in the future.

      On a similar note, there's genetic programming, where the building blocks are pieces of syntactically correct code("if", "then", "for"), and your fitness function is how fast the resultant program can solve a particular problem.

      Its interesting to see that given a problem like sorting, genetic programming will come up with the same solutions that we humans have already thought of. So that must mean there are no algorithms that are more efficient than the ones we have already thought of.

      I wonder if maybe one day this will solve the P=NP problem. :-)

      Cheers,

      Costyn.

    30. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Computers can never be as smart as humans because of the simple fact that humans have souls which allow a creative nature.

      Souls do not exist. The word "soul" is the name attributed to the emergent properties of the billions of neurons that are the human brain, much in the way that "flight" is the name given to the emergent properties of millions of mechanical and electrical parts that are a jet plane.

    31. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by sidesh0w · · Score: 1
      Given enough compute power, you could probably even brute force "creativity" and "thinking outside the box" e.g. by generating every possible idea, then selectively filtering out the usefull ones. In other words, given 1000 monkeys at a thousand typewriters for a thousand years, one of them would eventually patent 1-click online shopping.

      So does the computer come up with it's own filter rules, or does it just follow the rules you give it? Or maybe it slowly learns to imitate your preferences through Bayesian analysis or something? Or genetic algorithms produce a design best suited to criteria which you gave the computer? No matter how it is implemented, I don't see how this system could produce anything but results that were a reflection of the programmer's own preferences. Yes, the proverbial infinite monkey system would eventually produce good ideas, but you would still need a human to recognize them as such.

      Of course, that still doesn't prove computers can't ever think like we do. Although I doubt it, it may be possible. But it's not an issue of "we just need more computing power".

      On the other hand, I think it would be hilarious to watch Jeff Bezos negotiating with a monkey for the rights to that patent. "... so in return for $1.5 mil in stock, you will agree to stop flinging feces at me ..." et cetera

    32. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by chgros · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a relatively uncomplex system (a few handfuls of logic gates)
      I wouldn't call that an "uncomplex system", an FPGA usually has several million gates, and complexity is added by the analog effects ! Still, it is WAY less complex than a human brain (with billions of neurons, each of them being connected to thousands of others with somewhat analog connections)

    33. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by ojQj · · Score: 1
      The real problem arises in simulating truly creative human activities - for example the creation of an entirely new method of composing music that did not previously exist

      I've always found this argument interesting. Basically you are arguing that the definition of sentience is the ability to create entirely new areas of art and science. While these are, in my opinion, the most noble pursuits of the human race, they are not activities that every human individual takes part in. I would even go so far as to say that 90% or more of the people in this world can't do this. Even if the number is lower, you basically end up saying that a large portion of the human race isn't sentient.

      I think that sentience requirements which put sentience out of reach of more that just the severely mentally handicapped are too strict. I would put the bar lower and try a definition more like: the ability to learn significant facts and ideas without being explicitly taught them. Unfortunately this definition doesn't exclude all computer programs. Some can "learn" through experience.

      Still I'm interested in the argument. Can you come up with a definition of sentience which excludes as few humans as possible, and excludes all machines? In order to convince me of the correctness of your definition, you will have to convincingly argue that the humans who don't fit your definition of sentience really aren't sentient...

    34. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      But "pure" science is not without its weaknesses. Take the creation of the universe for instance. How can the methodologies of science alone ever hope to explain the origin of the big bang, when the laws of physics may not have existed in the form that we know them, if at all? We can't simply expect science to explain everything eventually, or we've abandoned science and invented another faith to take it's place.

      "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." ~Albert Einstein


      If a question cannot be answered through scientific observation and study, why not just say "I don't know" instead of making up a religious belief to fill in the gap? Is there really something so wrong with saying "I don't know" when we really don't know, and are left to merely assume or speculate without evidence?

    35. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by IICV · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but what you require from an intelligence to consider it truly "creative" is entirely too much. If you make this a requirement for sentience, you've just ruled out most of the world's population. When was the last time you made something that was not influenced by anything, in any way, that has been previously made? Something that was completely new, totally original? Almost nothing we make or do is entirely unique; there was almost always some inspiration for it in the past. Bringing something completely new into existance takes either genious level intellect or sheer blind luck, and a whole lot of effort in either case. I know that I, myself, have not made anything completely unique in my life, at least to the best of my knowledge. While writing this post, for instance, Newton's quote about standing on the shoulders of giants kept running through my mind. This is pretty much just an expansion on that.

      Besides, if you look closely, nothing we make comes into existance perfect. Every new technology that is made can be improved, however incrementally. Every new method of manufacture can be refined. Every hypothesis can be altered to fit the facts. And almost everything that appears "new" at first glance has roots in something else.

    36. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by warrax_666 · · Score: 1

      That statement (by Descartes?) is nonsense from any sort of logical standpoint. It should be "I think, therefore I think I am.".

      --
      HAND.
    37. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Simulating cells using super computers is the equivilent of running a PC Emulator on a spectrum, they arent designed for the job. Better to create native custom functions which perform the tasks required.
      With this in mind, I think as soon as we shift away from digital computers and go back to analog processors, the random X Factor will come back into play, and complex patterns will emerge.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    38. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Only about a hundred or less of the gates were used though, and the analogue effects only extended to nearby gate networks. In all only a tiny area of the potential space in the FPGA was used and had any part - active or passive - in the circuit.

    39. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a simple observation ... If the soul is responsible for creativity etc, then the "soul" (non-material) interacts with the physical (material). Even if we stipulate that there is such a thing as a non-material soul this point of interaction will at some point be able to be described. When this occurs we will be able to create a soul. Second most people aren't creative and do not "think outside side the box" (and considering your rather conventional assumptions...), does that mean that most people don't have souls?

    40. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with saying "I don't know", but there's a big difference between admitting that you don't know and claiming that if it can't be scientifically proven, that it cannot exist. Just because you don't know if people have souls or not, doesn't mean that you can claim that they don't exist.

    41. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I remember reading that genetic algs were used to optimize the 777 turbofan blades, and to teach a bipedal robot to walk in simulation (from a /. story a few weeks ago), to solving the traveling salesmen problem, or learning to play the best strategy in a game of blackjack. Fascinating stuff.

      Here's to hoping that another patent landgrab doesn't occur when people get their "invention machines" in gear. A lot of genetic alg output is incomprehensible to a human,, much like how DNA still is (tho it didn't stop people from patenting "discovered" genes, and squatting on them (like the breast cancer gene)).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    42. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by olman · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it was a real neural net, it wouldn't be self-aware. There would be no stimulus to develop the neural connections.

      And natural biological I/O? Who cares if you can download pr0n directly to your mind..

    43. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Borg_5x8 · · Score: 1

      Well now, is that a fact? ;)

    44. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Borg_5x8 · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, if we could build a computer that could manage all our thought processed (sentience, creativity etc), would that persuade you that the computer has a soul, or that humans never had them in the first place?

    45. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be "I think, therefore I think I am.".

      But if you have anything to think with, you must be...

    46. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> You are arguing that the brain is more than the sum of its synapses.

      It is. This comment also goes to those posts that have said there is no soul, because it can't be scientifically proven.

      Let me ask you a question: What is the difference between a live brain, and a dead brain? Physically, there may be nothing at all. What is it, then, that makes something 'alive'? If we put together all the molecules, cells, neurons, and everything else that makes up a brain, where is the switch that you flick to turn it on? There isn't one. That's because the alive-ness requires the soul, but not in a way that we scientifically understand.
      A car is useless without gasoline, a computer is useless without *nix, and a brain is useless without a soul.

    47. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by ddimas · · Score: 1

      No, some have killed their souls. Sad and horrible.

    48. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      ...it wouldn't be self-aware.

      It might be. I don't know because I haven't tried it yet... But I was thinking that you could pre-load it with a "hi-res" snapshot or a person's/rat's/snail's/whatever's brain. Run the app and there it is - all trained and setup ready to go. No development stimulus required.

      The catch being that 1 micron MRI scanning would take far too long and subject the sample to way too much radiation. Maybe not a problem for small samples with large synapses, but not something I'd volunteer for. If my info is outdated and it can be done in a practical manner now, that would be interesting... I wonder what would happen if a recently deceased subject was used? Could it be "reanimated" in software? Probably not, because I suspect it's the living electrical network that we need to copy, and a dead brain doesn't have that electrical activity.

      Who cares if you can download pr0n directly to your mind..

      Indeed, but you would have to learn how to do that. Providing natural IO (not necessarily biological, just mapped to a speaker and mikes in a way that appears natural to the application) lets the application (person?) work the way it already knows how to. It can learn about ethernet later. :)

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    49. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Have you ever heard of Cybernetic Poet? Or any of the music composing artificial intelligences? They regularly produce art which human judges mistake for man-made."

      Sorry, I don't listen to N'Sync.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    50. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      This idea of the Earth revolving around the sun is fable/fiction/pure speculation.

      This idea of matter bending space is fable/fiction/pure speculation.

      This idea of...well you get the point.

      I don't understand != it doesn't exist.

      Also, BTW: logical != scientific. And as far as "Nothing suggests"...talk to Roger Penrose. You can say that you don't think there's nothing the human brain can do that computers can't, but it's not accurate to say that there's no thinking /evidence at all to that effect.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    51. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So flight does not exist?

    52. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      So flight does not exist?

      Flight is the name given to what flying things do. You cannot have "flight" without something that flies.

      Similarly you cannot have a "soul" without an infrastructure (i.e. the brain-mind).

    53. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by olman · · Score: 1

      The catch being that 1 micron MRI scanning would take far too long and subject the sample to way too much radiation.

      Something like this was addressed in SF by Alastair Reynolds.. The scan would have to be faster than the speed the synaptic signals travel. That way you'd get "healthy happy" brain scan which was not aware of being fried by radiation yet. Of course there were some issues, such as..

      It can learn about ethernet later. :)

      Not to mention without hormones you probably wouldn't have that much interest in sex anyhow. Sounds boring, doesn't it..? Small wonder self-aware AIs are always going psycho/catatonic.

    54. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it depends on how you define "soul". The fact that you perceive stuff just proves that you are perceiving stuff. Maybe we could term that consciousness? Does that jive with what you define a soul as.

      I generally think of a soul as some kind of permenant essence of a person. If I use the definition I have to agree with the other guy and say it is "fable/fiction/pure speculation".

    55. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      You mention birds solving puzzles; I remember seeing a show on squirrels. They had a very complicated setup, with 10 or 12 poles with cones near the bottom (so the squirrels couldn't just climb the poles). They put food at the end, and the squirrels had to navigate the obstacle course.

      There were tunnels, "rides" (they hopped on a car which moved downhill to the next pole), doors which only opened a certain way, and even a cooperative feeder where one squirrel had to sit on a lever to open it, and the other could eat.

      I was very impressed to see both the problem-solving skills as well as the cooperation in animals as small as squirrels.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    56. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      ok, it might have some quantum computing ability,but that is far from accepted fact

      Check out this page -- the math is way over my head, but it does clearly state that the human brain works on quantum principles.

      It also has many, many links to supporting papers.

      My mind was blown back in March of 2000, when I read an article that stated the brain worked on quantum principles, so if we wanted to create a computer as powerful as the human brain we needed to understand quantum physics.

      3 weeks later, I read an article which said we had identified a quantum effect and could reproduce it in the lab: entanglement.

      Basically, entanglement allows instantaneous communication at a distance; by changing the spin of one electron, the spin of its entangled pair is also changed. This article shows that (in 1997) they had tested it to a distance of 7 miles; they say there's no theoretical limit to the distance it could work at.

      What blew my mind was that combining the two articles -- the human brain works on quantum principles, and one of those principles is communication at a distance -- I now believe that telepathy is possible.

      Then I thought of the (admittedly anecdotal) evidence: we've all heard about a mother knowing when a child is in danger. But how many times have you heard of a father knowing? Me either. It must be that, during the 9 months the child is inside the mother's womb, exchanging fluids, that they are performing entanglement with each other.

      Thinking further, we hear about twins being much more closely linked than any mother and child. This also makes sense, since they are right next to each other and have more opportunity to entangle than mother and child, whose brains are about 2 feet apart.

      I'd imagine we're in the first 10% or so of our "evolution" of telepathy, since we communicate with words and rarely use entanglement to communicate. That's really neat, because most people think "we're top of the food chain, we're perfect" but we are still evolving capabilities.

      The article also mentions that SETI may be doomed to failure since it's looking for radio signals, and any sufficiently advanced species would use entanglement for their communications since it's much faster and more efficient.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    57. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And natural biological I/O? Who cares if you can download pr0n directly to your mind..

      I think you'd care as soon as you figured out that you have no way to stimulate yourself to an orgasm. Then again, pr0n probably wouldn't mean anything if the simulation didn't account for the effects of hormones on the human mind.

    58. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by TroyFoley · · Score: 1

      AC is correct, but circularly so. I'd rather put forth the notion that If I think I am, how could I not be?

      --
      After I have received the wisdom of good teaching, I will untiringly teach all people. - The Teachings of Buddha
    59. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Psst. Hate to burst your bubble, but take a look around...

      Humans, by and large, are highly trained parrots. Hell, most of us aren't even highly trained.

      How many billions of people have lived, and how many *truly* different stories do we have? A dozen? maybe two?

    60. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1
      I've always found this argument interesting. Basically you are arguing that the definition of sentience is the ability to create entirely new areas of art and science. While these are, in my opinion, the most noble pursuits of the human race, they are not activities that every human individual takes part in.

      All people do not do these things. Nearly all people appreciate them, though. Otherwise nobody would engage in them.

      Can you come up with a definition of sentience which excludes as few humans as possible, and excludes all machines?

      Having a sense of aesthetics is common to nearly all humans, but no machines.

    61. Re:The Matrix is just a movie by Valar · · Score: 1

      You raise an interesting point, which is that the works of these AIs are created after the AI studies the works of human artists. However, nearly all human creators study the works of others first. Certainly, musicians ususally usually listen to music before they become creators of their own works. Similarly, visual artists and writers are also inspired by their predecessors. These AIs do sometimes (actually, often, but misguided programmers tend to discourage this behavior in the system rather than encourage it) violate stylistic guidelines, and can thus be seen to 'innovate' in their respective fields.

      Furthermore, the brilliant thing about many AI methods (neural nets come to mind), is that the system is so complicated that we don't really have a full understanding of it. On a local level, we understand the idea of artificial neurons, etc. and their parallels to biological systems. However, on the level of the system as a whole, it is often uncertain how it will behave.

      I believe the theorem you are looking for is Godel's. It applies solely to formalized arithmatic, though there are a class of related proofs for other systems. They say, basically, that if a part of system can reference another part of the same system, a paradox can occur. It is the old problem of saying 'I tell only lies.' It is similar (for the programmers among us) to two functions which call each other in a circular way.

  14. Newest diet fad? by groove10 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Want to burn calories while sitting in front of your computer at work? How about shedding those extra pounds while powering your TV at the same time?

    This way people will get an increased metabolism (since some of your sugars are being converted into energy for non-local entities), and they will be able to reduce the number of batteries and other power sources needed.

    Just wait till the come out with some nano-bots that run off this process and will scrub the plaque off your arterial walls. That would be the killer app.

    --
    MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
    1. Re:Newest diet fad? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Want to burn calories while sitting in front of your computer at work? How about shedding those extra pounds while powering your TV at the same time?

      This way people will get an increased metabolism (since some of your sugars are being converted into energy for non-local entities), and they will be able to reduce the number of batteries and other power sources needed.

      Just wait till the come out with some nano-bots that run off this process and will scrub the plaque off your arterial walls. That would be the killer app.


      This could be both a good thing and a bad thing. Firstly it will obviously save lives due to the pure fact of weight loss but will it replace exercise? I've done a lot of running this summer, partially it was to lose about 15 pounds I put on over classes. Now even with those extra 15 pounds I was not what anybody would classify as fat but I was out of shape and found the extra weight was slowing me down. Either way I haven't lost all that extra weight but I don't really care as I have really improved my conditioning (though not to the level of the previous summer when I did a fair amount of running as well). Either way my concern is that this will take away these peoples major stimulus for exercise by making them feel healthy with their smaller cross-section when they are in just as bad shape as before except for a reduced risk of heart disease and maybe fewer joint problems. Also if you consider anorexics(sp?!?) already what will happen when they can do it much more easily and conveniently with one of these devices/technologies I can see this as a huge problem when people run their bodies energy supplies into the ground with the touch of a dial in the pursuit of a pencil thin waist and end up starving to death while on a seemingly healthy diet.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Newest diet fad? by allanj · · Score: 1

      Want to burn calories while sitting in front of your computer at work? How about shedding those extra pounds while powering your TV at the same time?


      This could just as easily be accomplished with an exercise-bike running a generator, which again charges a battery powering the computer/TV. It has the added advantage of increasing muscle size at the same time. Oh, and it's available right now too.


      Much less geekiness, far more realistic - even healthy. But these three factors alone make it a less attractive solution to the average /. crowd, I guess.

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
    3. Re:Newest diet fad? by Urkki · · Score: 1
      No, excercising means you have to *do* something to get your body use more energy, and your muscles will have to work harder to spend that energy. This is all good of course, you both lose weight *and* get into better shape.

      This invention just increases the energy consumption of your body without you needing to do anything or feel discomfort (except mild hunger perhaps, if actually want to lose weight and get your body to convert fat into glucose instead of just eating more).

      (And for you few excercise freaks out here: being exhausted or having sore muscles counts as "discomfort" for most fat slobs, not to mention possible injuries ;)

    4. Re:Newest diet fad? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      you could, in theory, just hack this doodad

      http://www.sharperimagebest.com/li111.html

      and have it power your tv.

      --

      no .sig
    5. Re:Newest diet fad? by ddimas · · Score: 1
      "Just wait till the come out with some nano-bots that run off this process and will scrub the plaque off your arterial walls. That would be the killer app.

      What if they don't stop with the plaque?EEYYYWWWWW!!!!!!!

    6. Re:Newest diet fad? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      ...except mild hunger perhaps, if actually want to lose weight and get your body to convert fat into glucose instead of just eating more

      Are you sure about that? IANAPhysiologist, but I am a 2 time marathoner/triathlete/weight lifter who has read a lot about exercise physiology and nutrition. I suspect that you would get tired as well. Even when at rest you body is consuming glucose, if there is some activity depleting glucose your body will feel sluggish as it doesn't have the glucose it needs as readily available. My (non-expert) opinion is that you would probably feel like you had just worked out, minus the elevated heart rate, breathing rate, tired muscles, and (maybe) the sweat...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    7. Re:Newest diet fad? by Urkki · · Score: 1
      I suppose you're much more of an expert than I am then. But I don't think you'd feel anything like after working out. Then your muscles have just worked hard, probably hormone levels changed and all that, and you actually feel good, not just tired.

      No, I think the feeling would be more like the feeling you get around 4pm if you skipped lunch and drank only low-energy drinks (be it black coffee or plain water) during the day. I know *that* feeling, and it's nothing like the feeling after working out. And even excercising after that doesn't necessarily result in extra tiredness (as long as your body has enough energy reserves I suppose), just feeling extra hungry. I can do decent excercise (like cycling home 30 minutes) after that kind of day without becoming any more tired than if I had had proper lunch. Of course that's only one day at a time, with "extra hungry" size dinner, not quite same than having permanently reduced blood sugar level...

      Then again, I'm sure body would easily and quickly adopt to extra glucose comsumption by nanobots, and would put more glucose in the blood. Where does it come from anyway? Some comes from digested food directly. Where and when does stored energy get turned into blood sugar?

      Hmm... One thing that comes into mind, my understanding is that protein (eg muscle) is easier to turn into glucose than turning fat into glucose. So I think that getting no excercise, just reduced blood sugar level (be it because of glucose eating nanobots or because of just eating less) might reduce muscle mass rather than that flapping beer belly... Quite a bummer ;)

      On the bright side, I suppose that protein loss can be offset by proper protein-rich diet...

    8. Re:Newest diet fad? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Unless you aren't properly nourished to begin with, 30 minutes of cycling shouldn't deplete your blood glucose levels that much. That being said, I think I probably phrased the last part of my post poorly. There is a different kind of post workout feeling for different durations and intensities of workout. I don't really start to feel 'flat' (what they call glucose depleted state in endurance circles) until I have been running for 1:15-1:30 or biking for ~2:00 without replenishment. Flat is a somewhat difficult condition to explain, but you will know it when you get it... your legs feel heavy, it is harder to breath, actually it is kind of similar to the 4pm feeling, but without the hunger...

      I completely agree that you should be able to adapt to the drain, that is what I have been working on so hard... :)

      The protein vs. fat issue: the best way to handle that would be to increase you calorie intake almost as much as you deplete the glucose (I eat 5000 cal/day). The fat goes away long term, and the protein short term. ex: If you get completely depleted and keep going, that will cost you some muscle, but if you run slightly depleted often over many weeks, then the fat will go to boosting the levels.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    9. Re:Newest diet fad? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      "Just wait till the come out with some nano-bots that run off this process and will scrub the plaque off your arterial walls."


      Two words: Deus Ex.

    10. Re:Newest diet fad? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Yea, I could lose 50 pounds.
      hook me up!

      But seriously, scrubbing plaque off my arterial wall is not a killer app. Its a life saver!

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  15. stupid body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    your body stupidly wastes glucose in maintaining homeostasis

    My homo-status is NONE of your business.

    1. Re:stupid body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your homo-status is partly fabulous with brief periods of Christopher Lowell.

    2. Re:stupid body by Phishpin · · Score: 1

      Vivaaaa los Bio-Dome!

      Mini tribal

      --
      -phish
  16. Has potential by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think about it. Burning extra glucose means it cannot be stored as fat or what not.

    Kinda also revives the coppertop thingy from the matrix though...

    What they really need is an implant that looks like a wall outlet so I can plug my discman into it :-)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Has potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention slashdot editors! tomstdenis has developed a technique to obtain power from bottled mangoo!

    2. Re:Has potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kinda also revives the coppertop thingy from the matrix though...

      Still not a significant amount of energy compared to fusion or even fission, though.

    3. Re:Has potential by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Assuming mangoo is what I think it is, it does in fact contain fats, proteins, carbohydrates and probably glucose that oddly enough probably can be used somehow by this device.

      found via google:

      http://www.abbys-sexual-health.com/fun/sperm_fac ts .php

      So smartass AC, looks like you posted something that was on topic and insightful. Congrats!

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Has potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why am I not surprised tomstdenis knows mangoo facts?

    5. Re:Has potential by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Because I know how to ue google? I'm sorry I was educated in the ways of doing research. It's so hard to be humble when I'm just so darn superior!

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Has potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. I bet you have sperm facts as your homepage.

  17. Interesting by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

    So, does that put a new meaning on "Making your blood boil?" :P

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
    1. Re:Interesting by BrynM · · Score: 1

      Boiling with your blood maybe????

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:Interesting by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Ah touche! =)

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *BOOM!!*

  18. Oh no... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    Last two times I had blood extracted, I passed out and held up the doctor's office for 15 minutes in the process. Oh well, it's back to pencil and paper. Unless it now requires paper cuts...

    1. Re:Oh no... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      I almost passed out last time... It's really not fun...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  19. I want the opposite by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give me an implant that uses electricity to create glucose, so that I can plug myself into the wall and not have to stop to eat during those long coding sessions.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  20. Whats next? by Guardmasta · · Score: 1

    These things just get stranger and stranger :( Whats next... clone farms that are senslessly slaughtered to create the said blood to power our world o_0

    1. Re:Whats next? by joFFeman · · Score: 2, Funny

      they'll call it 'operation clone farm freedom'

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  21. Don't ask, Don't tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton's best domestic policy decision, despite what the far left and far right say.

  22. Hey you Porky! by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would the morbidly obese qualify for US Department of Energy rebates?

    1. Re:Hey you Porky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would the morbidly obese qualify for US Department of Energy rebates?

      I think you have found the missing step that makes Open Source Software profitable!!!

      1. Write Open Source Software
      2. Become Morbidly Obese From Lack of Physical Activity and Diet of Bawls and Donut Holes
      3. ??? <-- Sell Excess Sugary Blood!!!
      4. PROFIT!!!
  23. A very Obvious use...... by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    No need for those diets.Eat all you want and then just convert the extra clories into energy. No more flat batteries.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  24. What's not next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Duh.

    The clones continually create blood. There's no reason to slaughter them.

    1. Re:What's not next by Guardmasta · · Score: 1

      Point.... *locates some coffee*

  25. Serious ramifications by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    With AI becoming more intelligent, this presents some serious consequences as AI might have another power source. Combine the two, will we have a race of vampire-like androids? If we do:

    I, for one, welcome our new blood-sucking masters.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Serious ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering it would take 140,000 humans to produce the same power as a single nuclear plant, it is more likely our new robotic overlords will opt for nuclear, thus relegating humans to the waste heap of extinct species.

    2. Re:Serious ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • 6,000,000,000 / 140,000 = 42,857 nuclear power plants worth

      • self reproducing and each "generation" good for ~60 years of production
      • ~433 nuclear power plants currently worldwide
      • Estimated world supply of easily mineable Uranium: 3,107,000 tons
      • 3,107,000 / 60,000 tons per year to run all reactors worldwide = ~51 years worth of power
      • Uranium NOT self reproducing

      So you see, blood is the way to go.
  26. Us Nerds by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Will nerds who LAN party all day lose the extra weight?

    I mean of course the fat nerds. You scrawny nerds might now even be able to tap into this.

    I know 100W (75W proc) isn't much for a desktop, but it could probably power a laptop, or at least really extend it's life. Or bosses could have special low power desktops and pay the employees to power the system being blackout immune and less expensive. Just keep the Fresca in stron supply.

    Could P0rn become healthy?
    Slight Calorie starvation greatly increases longevity, and lower overal coloric intake is the number dietery life span predicter.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  27. I want this!!! by Elpacoloco · · Score: 1

    Raising my blood sugar is as simple as a 25 cent cola.

    Being able to make my own power in times of trouble would be priceless.

    (Especially considering how often the power can suddenly go out where I live.)

    1. Re:I want this!!! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a 25 cent cola in about 25 years...

    2. Re:I want this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to Wal-Mart. That Sam's Choice shit is $0.25...

    3. Re:I want this!!! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Ignore Wal-Mart. Go to Costco. A 24-pack for $3 comes to 2 sodas for a quarter. If you want more variety, a 6-pack typically goes for $1, so 16.7 cents a soda.

      No one said any of these prices are for Coke or Pepsi products, mind you.

  28. Vampire robot slaves! by Larne · · Score: 1
    I imagine most readers will want to make some sort of "Matrix" reference (as the article itself does), but this makes me think of Davy Crockett's Vampire Robot Slaves from Matt Crocco's and Liam Lynch's (the Sifl and Olly guys) album "History of America?"

    (Voice of Davy)
    I'm starting to get scared because these
    robots are aware
    that I'm running out of food, blood's
    a bubbling crude
    I'm hoping in the next town there will be
    blood to be found
    If I don't keep them pleased they'll be
    feeding off me

    (voice of vampire robot slaves)
    Cuz' Davy Crocket says
    He'd feed us blood for days

    We want blood

  29. Matrix by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Ah, so this is how the Matrix used us as energizer batteries.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  30. Other uses by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, some fly-by-night internet "entrepreneur" is going to spin a tale about how this pioneering new technology can help you increase the size of your penis. You watch.

    1. Re:Other uses by frankthechicken · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn man, if blood doesn't increase the size of your penis, then what on earth does? Unless you've got some form of winch and rack system going on, in which case I'd rather not know, though it sounds like a nice hack.

    2. Re:Other uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone else feel uneasy with the work "hack" being used in relation to the word "penis"...?

    3. Re:Other uses by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Forget that - think an implanted joy buzzer in the hand. Imagine the wacky hilarity when a simple handshake results in "shock & awe" instead, without any visibile apparatus on the prankster's hand! Coming soon from Ronco!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Other uses by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine the results when one shakes "the monkey" instead.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Other uses by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I can see it now... all the bunny ranches in Nevada are going to have all their girls have these implanted in all the right places...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Other uses by Nobody+Real · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else feel uneasy with the work "hack" being used in relation to the word "penis"...?

      As long as the word "off" isn't in there, I'm fine.

  31. Actual application... by FingerDemon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, all the Matrix jokes aside, this does have some potentially excellent applications. I remember the first time I heard someone talking about pacemakers and how the batteries in them wear out. I asked the obvious question, "How do they replace them?"

    It involves surgery. YIKES! Granted, it is probably minor surgery compared to getting the thing put in there to begin with, but knowing it was powered by your own blood would surely be a welcome change to these folks.

    I mean if you think replacing the battery on your motherboard is a pain, think of doing it on an outpatient basis.

    --

    "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    1. Re:Actual application... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      I thought some of them used an induction coil and a small device worn on the belt to recharge a battery... so you plug in the belt thingy when it gets low, and it keeps the pacemaker charged.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    2. Re:Actual application... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      the important question is how many operatant hours these glucose -> electricity devices last.

    3. Re:Actual application... by TheTwoBest · · Score: 1

      Pacemaker batteries tend to last about 10 years. At the point the device is generally replaced with a newer model with a fresh battery. So far, the improvements made over the 10 years warent the surgery, hense there has been no real rush to develop a way to charge the battery.

      Pacemakers are usually located just under the patients left collar bone, and the surgery can usually be done on an outpatient basis. Additionally, when simply replacing an older pacemaker, the leads are not replaced, greatly simplifying the surgery. The greatest risk comes from infection associated with the small incision in the chest.

    4. Re:Actual application... by egarland · · Score: 1

      How about an internal monitoring system for the human body that could record data in real-time so that rates of change and other dynamic information can be collected and it could transmit the data to the outside world using a wireless link. If adopted, this technology would lead to huge improvements of the understanding of all aspects of human health and medicine.

      Along the same lines there could be an auto-activating emergency beacon that would transmit when it detects something went wrong inside you (rapid blood pressure drop, pulse way too fast/slow, temperature dangerously high/low) recharging itself from your blood supply. It could use the celular network to send a distress signal or it could use some other triangulatable signal on it's own frequency. This could even be combined with the medical monitoring system into an all-in-one implant.

      How about a brain UPS, a simple device that pumps blood to your brain and lungs when your real heart stops working (heart attack) drawing power from the blood it's pumping keeping your brain alive until someone can get your real heart back working. If made safe it could be put into people at high risk for heart attacks.

      --
      set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
    5. Re:Actual application... by mlock · · Score: 1

      Your pacemaker should better have some energy stored in itself ... Imagine having a heart attack, so no blood gets pumped, so your pacemaker has no more energy, so it can't revitalize you ...

    6. Re:Actual application... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      There is an artificial heart being tested that use induction. Without charging it only lasts for 45 minutes. With a battery belt and an induction charger the patient can move around for about 3 hours without charging.

    7. Re:Actual application... by Fratz · · Score: 1

      I remember the first time I heard someone talking about pacemakers and how the batteries in them wear out. I asked the obvious question, "How do they replace them?"

      It involves surgery. YIKES!


      The AbioCor heart uses/used rechargeable batteries. I wonder why they don't do that for pacemakers.

      --
      -- Fratz, human
  32. Ahhh, Gordon! by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ahhh, Gordon, good to see you. We've found a way to keep your HEV charged, but you'll find you need the cola machines more."

  33. Diabetics by fantastic+max · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this would work in a diabetic...

    1. Re:Diabetics by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      I wonder how this would work in a diabetic...

      Probably something like this.

  34. Why not a simple thermocouple? by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    For external as well as internal devices, why not a thermocouple instead of something as potentially invasive and draining as a blood-borne device?

    1. Re:Why not a simple thermocouple? by Avian+visitor · · Score: 1

      Thermocouple needs two spots with different temperatures to generate electric current. You can't directly convert heat to electricity.

      You would have to have one part of thermocouple inside the body (at body temperature) and one outside (at the ambient temperature).

      Besides, small thermocouples are very inefficient. With temperature differences like those achievable with human body, you could only get a few microvolts.

  35. Bums Blood and $$$ by BelugaParty · · Score: 1

    I guess bums won't have to go to the blood bank for extra cash anymore. Instead, they can just stand around airport terminals offering blood to power some desperate execs laptop! WOOOWHOOOO

  36. Overload by spector30 · · Score: 1

    If your body were full of nanomechanisms that feed off the glucose that you ingest and someone pumps you full of glucose will you overheat in some fashion? How would you keep the process in check, or does it naturally stop "feeding" when it is fully powered up? And what happens when the process starts using all of the available glucose?

    The other big issue I see for embedded/implanted mechanisms is control. Diabetics currently are the only ones that have to be hyper-aware of their sugar intake. In the future with these types of implants we could all end up with a glucose monitoring system of some sort. I say buy stock now.

    --
    If Darwin was right, you'd be dead by now.
  37. Pacemakers by niko9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could be used as a source of energy for implantable pacemakers and defibrillators, with the battery as a backup.

  38. First one to make a Matrix referrence... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... will get beaten with a large, heavy and blunt object and be sentenced to insanity by joining AOL chatrooms with the nickname "-=lilgrrl13=-".

    Thank you for your attention, carry on minions!

    1. Re:First one to make a Matrix referrence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bite my pinkish meaty ass!

    2. Re:First one to make a Matrix referrence... by istewart · · Score: 1

      "-" and "=" are invalid characters in AOL screennames.

  39. power my laptop by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Now how many of you Slashdotters would it take to power my laptop?

    Hell, I would use it just to help burn calories and loose weight.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  40. The Matrix Exists! by michaelepley · · Score: 1

    The matrix exists to turn people into batteries.

  41. Nanotech by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Non article readers should note that the systems was developed by Panasonic Nanotech Research Lab, for the purpose of powering bloodborne nanomachines.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  42. A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by Cordath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are those who mod thier cases and those who mod their bodies... but the lines are blurring. Soon people will be buying LED's and Dracucells to implant under their skin. Just think... You could implant a matrix of LED's in your back to operate like an animated billboard! Who will be the first beach-bum to add a cellular uplink so they can sell ad-space online?

    1. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by heyyojay · · Score: 1

      That tread has already started. Big CEO's have implanted computerchips that tell doors to open for them. No doubt this will be implimented into the private citizen use. Instead of the batery dieing in that computer chip in the guys arm, it will just take the power from the glucose. Energizer better watch out, theres a new batery in town. US...

    2. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      I bet someone on BMEZine.com has already done it.

      One of their featured "body modders" had his twin brother's right arm grafted to his chest.

    3. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      What, and become a corporate whore!? Sounds worse then being a consumer whore. Debatable I suppose.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by 1029 · · Score: 1

      "but the lines are blurring."

      I suppose someone should tell you about tatoos and piercings. People have been modding their bodies for as long as they have been worshiping the eye in the sky. It is just now moving into the realm of using the current technology is all.

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    5. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      I just imagined what a matrix of 25x25 LEDs would feel like in my back. Not comfortable. >_

      Of course, I still have chilling thoughts about the demon with the beehive in his back from Ninja Scroll...

    6. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

      Actually, a friend and I were talking a few years back about a similar idea. This was back when "molecular gates" were the new big thing (basically physical gates made up of only a few molecules). We figured that in a few years, when they finally got the technology working well, the new fad would be animated tatoos. You would just implant the thing in the skin, and it would move around different colors of ink to animate the thing. The only thing we figured was that it would probably have to have a slow frame rate, as about the only clock possible was the beating of the heart.

      Maybe someday, the lady will dance by herself, instead of only when the forearm flexes. :)

      (Also, my appologies if the friend was still hoping to capitalize on this idea.)

    7. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant the lines between modding you body and modding the case of your computer. Soon _you_ will _be_ the case of your computer, so you can mod both at the same time.

    8. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by cfuse · · Score: 1
      One of their featured "body modders" had his twin brother's right arm grafted to his chest.

      Christ knows what they'll do now that they can bung a hole bunch of leds in there ...

    9. Re:A bold step forward for Human Case Modding by cfuse · · Score: 1

      1)Watch
      I hate wearing a watch and use my mobile to tell the time - but there are situations where I must turn it off, then I have no idea what the time is.
      All you would need would be a momentary on-switch which you press to display the time on leds or something under the skin, or perhaps even the time spoken into your ear canal/drum.

      2)Mobile phone
      Why not just implant the whole phone.

      3)TV remote
      Never lose it again.

      4)PDA
      Appointments, addresses, etc.

      5)Vibrator
      What the hell, why not!

  43. I am a by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Sir, are you classified at human"
    "Negative, I am a meat popsicle"

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    1. Re:I am a by marko123 · · Score: 1

      "Why can't I moderate down for piss-poor spelling?"

      Because you have already posted in this topic.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    2. Re:I am a by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      That's what I get for cutting and pasting....

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  44. Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you sell YOUR soul to Milhouse for $5?

  45. Human Arrogance (wasRe:The Matrix is just a movie) by bug1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You talk about intelligence, and being as smart as humans.

    When you talk about intelligence, you are really refering to _human_ intellegence.

    Do you not understand that what is considered to be intelligent behaviour is relative to your environment.

    Do you understard that it would be very stupid for
    - a cow in its native environment to behave as if its a hippopotamus.
    - a human in its native environment to behave as if it were a bird.
    - a computer in its native environment to behave as if it were a human.

    Why would a computer think like a human, its not a human. It doesnt have a human body, or a human mind, neither does a cow, a bird or a monkey, but it doesnt mean they dont possess intellegence.

    We shouldnt be so arrogant to only percieve inteligence as behaviour that mimicks ours.

    If we fully understood the human brain, if we could predict behaviour based on the brains current knowledge and its environmental stimulus then would you still consider humans to be inteligent ?

    Any technology sufficiently advanced appears like magic, thats what our brain is.
    Just because we are masters of our computers doesnt mean computers are incapable of intellegence.
    Just because we dont understand our brain doesnt mean it has a magic quality, a soul.

  46. Not very practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    But if you were to make one that ran off of human fat, we could take advantage of our tremendous natural resources here in the United States. Now that would be a renewable energy policy.

  47. A Pound of Flesh by femto · · Score: 1

    Now we know what Shylock really wanted that pound of flesh for. Too bad he stuffed up the contract and forgot to order the blood option!

  48. Other Uses by 1stflight · · Score: 1

    Bionics, imagine this device power Geordi life VISORS for the blind... or heart implants, you name it.

  49. No no no! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is definitely not an area where anyone would want a killer app!


    Well, now that I think about it, just not for oneself... >:]

    --------
    If I can own an idea, does that mean I can legally claim some portion of your soul once I tell you that idea? Or even if you just come up with it on your own? Heck, who needs contracts in blood... (except the nanobots now)

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  50. Very useful right away, let alone in the future by Zergwyn · · Score: 3, Informative
    There are already a lot of implantable devices for which power is a big concern. From simple things like pacemakers and sensors to more complex and experimental devices like artificial hearts, everything needs juice. One of the big problems, for instance, with some early devices is that in order to add more juice you had two bad options:

    1. Have some sort of actual device sticking out of the body. This is bad, because it breaches the skin, our natural defensive screen, and such things tend to become very easily infected.

    2. Surgery to replace cells. Again, any surgery at all is going to be both expensive and risk prone.


    More recently, a third option has become available: having fully implanted power system that can be recharged wirelessly, via em radiation of some kind (you can google for it). This is a big gain, because it allows devices that are more power hungry while still maintaining the benefits of not breaching the skin and not needing frequent operations. But it still requires people to remember and have access to the appropriate charging device consistantly. If for any reason some one forgets or can't recharge, the device may shut down, sometimes with fatal results. So having a way to remove one more step for powering these things should really help improve the quality of life for a lot of people today.

    Of course, personally I find this to be a very exciting development for future things as well. When we get to the point of having more optional implants, for things like boosting hearing or vision, a way to power them will be necessary, and if the power requirements are low, then this system would be perfect. Ultimately, widespread adoption of anything, from an OS to a vehicle, is all about making it as easy and intuitive for end users as possible. There is a lot of interesting stuff going on for advanced things like brain-computer interfaces, and people who are interested should look around, as the state of the art has advanced a great deal in the past 5 years. Here are a few links for the curious, and much more can be found with google, of course:

    Graz University of Technology

    Standford/DVA Neural Interface Project

    Beyond the Big Barrier(lighter, intro type stuff)
    News Group:
    sci.med.psychobiology

    1. Re:Very useful right away, let alone in the future by demonbug · · Score: 1
      There are already a lot of implantable devices for which power is a big concern. From simple things like pacemakers and sensors to more complex and experimental devices like artificial hearts, everything needs juice. One of the big problems, for instance, with some early devices is that in order to add more juice you had two bad options:

      1. Have some sort of actual device sticking out of the body. This is bad, because it breaches the skin, our natural defensive screen, and such things tend to become very easily infected.


      Couldn't you just recharge through induction? I'm pretty sure this is how my electric toothbrush recharges - no metal to metal contact, just the charger inducing a current which charges the battery in the toothbrush. Works through a few millimeters of plastic anyway, though I suppose the conductivity of skin might pose a problem.

    2. Re:Very useful right away, let alone in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the largish paragraph under "2." It's right there, although he doesn't actually mention induction.

  51. lighting! by RyLaN · · Score: 2, Funny

    imagine 50-60W worth of LEDs... drink the Mountain Dew and glow green, start to run out of sugar and you'd glow red.. people could start eating when they changed color instead of when they were hungry

    --
    At least the war on the environment is going well
  52. Trolling, I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'm bored so I'll bite.

    Species of primates use simplistic tools,
    thus demonstrating creativity. By your definition, they must have souls. Of course most people who believe in the soul refute that idea.

    I assume you must refute evolution as well, as there is no reason to believe that the process that lead to the creation of man and his simian relatives could not eventually lead to another intelligence with creative abilities, by man's design, genetic algorithms, or what have you...

  53. Diabetes by heir2chaos · · Score: 1

    I could see a future in using this technology combined with some glucose monitors to help diabetics to keep their blood sugar under control without needles or external monitors. With a simple implant, an individual would be able to live a completely normal life.

    1. Re:Diabetes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to make light of diabetes, but....

      With a simple implant, an individual would be able to live a completely normal life.

      Sheesh, doesn't that sound like a Borg marketing slogan?

  54. Homeostasis by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but I don't consider the maintenance of homeostasis in my body to be a waste of glucose.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    1. Re:Homeostasis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah. It was a joke.

  55. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I remember in the '80s that the idea of running blood over dissimilar metals to produce electricity came up as an idea to power electronic devices. The problem was, the dissimilar metals were things like Aluminum and Cadmium. These are not metals you would want in your body if you could help it. I wonder what new toxins this invention would introduce in the body.

    Of course, a possible application could be using to power RF tags for endangered species - of course if there is an issue on the toxicity of the power source then all we would be doing is allowing ourselves to document in excrutiating detail our extinction of the species.

    myke

  56. They have NOT 'developed' this device by Geartest.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The submitter got it wrong. This device is in development and they can only generate extremely low power levels. They are developing the process. Here was my (rejected) post:

    Scientists at Matsushita's Nanotechnology Research Laboratory in Japan are developing a power generator that uses blood to produce electricity. It emulates the process the body uses to convert food into energy. The scientists say the "bio-nano" generator could be used to run devices embedded in the body, or sugar-fed robots. Dr. Kazuo Eda, who heads the research, says bio-nano fuel cells are the next step for researchers after generators powered by hydrogen, natural gas and methanol. Hmmm... robots that use humans as batteries -- can The Matrix be far behind? ;)

    1. Re:They have NOT 'developed' this device by Superfarstucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess your submittal wasn't slashdotsational enough...

    2. Re:They have NOT 'developed' this device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last sentence redundant... this is slashdot

  57. This was done long ago by Boyceterous · · Score: 4, Funny

    when Uncle Fester was able to light that incandescent bulb in his mouth!

    1. Re:This was done long ago by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Fester wasn't a battery silly. He was a capacitor.

  58. Screw 'human batteries' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100W novelty hand buzzer!

  59. power drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a person in excellent physical condition, I can only expend 250 watts for 30 minutes at time before I'm tapped out. I know this because I spend my lunch hour every day on a eliptical machine with a dynometer.

    I can see it now, an out of shape slashdoter expires after powering his laptop for 8 straight hours, hoards of lawyers decend, story at 11.

  60. Stop following me! by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now how many of you Slashdotters would it take to power my laptop?

    Too many I suspect until geek hygiene improves dramatically.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  61. Some interesting applications: by CracktownHts · · Score: 1

    Self powered diabetes control systems. You can use the excess glucose into power, and when the level is too low, it can release a reserve of glucose.

    Weight loss implants. Eat all the chocolate you like, and then use it to start your car.

    This was actually my idea before sorehands came along and stole it. So... is your sister hot?

  62. Who needs insulin?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha. I plan to plug in, turn on, and drink up.

  63. Obvious jokes aside... by Stephonovich · · Score: 2, Funny
    Unfortunately, people beat me to the obvious Matrix jokes. But ah well.

    If they can figure out a way to get a reasonable amount of power without adversely effecting your health, this could be most excellent. I don't think we'll be powering our laptops and cell phones with this, (although a cell phone doesn't suck that much power) but for powering a pacemaker, as someone else suggested, this would be quite useful.

    Also of use would be powering the so-called "Soldier of the Future". If our military is indeed to have Deus Ex-esque implants, then this could power them effeciently. I also wonder if this could power night vision goggles...

    (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  64. sounds like a good excuse by Dogun · · Score: 1

    to start pumping out more low power chips! Feynman gates anyone?

  65. Damn you, homeostasis!!! by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2, Informative

    DAMN YOU, HOMEOSTASIS!!!! You ruin all my hopes and dreams!

  66. diet by XiaouTuzi · · Score: 1

    mmm new diet

  67. Now everyone will know I'm high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My ear-mounted reading lamp dims when I get the munchies.

  68. Pacemaker Recharge by Induction by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    "Pacemakers ... How do they replace them?" ... It involves surgery ..."

    Pacemakers are now recharged by induction, without surgery ... anyway that's what I've heard.

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Pacemaker Recharge by Induction by cthugha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so. A relative of mine has just had a pacemaker fitted, and replacement of the device is required every time the Li battery goes flat. You couldn't use induction to charge a pacemaker, because the electronics don't react well to strong magnetic fields, which is a problem if those same electronics have the job of making sure your heart beats at the correct rate (or at all).

      Induction is, however, used to communicate with and program the device, since the fields are weak enough not to cause a problem.

    2. Re:Pacemaker Recharge by Induction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm induction was tried a number of years ago (late 70's) but proved to be a problem because it would cause heating of the surounding tisue which people found uncomfortable. In a more inocent age there was even a brief fad for systems powered by a small piec of radioactive material. The fact is that most of the time a 10 year old pacemaker is so far behind in the technology stakes that it is time to remove it anyway, manufactureres have learnt this and so only put power for 10 years in the units rather than making units that can last as long as possible (many units form the early 80s could last for upwards of 20 years before needing a new battery.

    3. Re:Pacemaker Recharge by Induction by IICV · · Score: 1

      Who says the batteries are near the thing? I think they string the batteries on a bit of wire far enough away so that the induction doesn't interfere with the electronics. At least, that's what I would do.

    4. Re:Pacemaker Recharge by Induction by cthugha · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Who says the batteries are near the thing? I think they string the batteries on a bit of wire far enough away so that the induction doesn't interfere with the electronics. At least, that's what I would do.

      But that's not how it's actually done: the battery and electronics forrm a single unit, with the only leads being the ones connecting the pacemaker to the heart itself. I'm not medically trained, but I guess there'd be two reasons for this. Firstly, there's not a lot of room in the body for lots of components spaced out all over the place, and not many convenient sites to put things; case-modding to give yourself more room is not an option. Currently, pacemakers are installed under a local anaesthetic through a small incision in the chest; your solution would likely require a more difficult procedure

      Secondly, there's always the risk that the pacemaker leads could be dislodged through even normal body movement: patients are instructed not to engage in certain activities (not lifting their arm on the pacemaker's side of the body above the chest, just to name one). Having another wire connecting a string of components just compounds that problem.

  69. Killer App by X-wes · · Score: 1
    Just wait till the come out with some nano-bots that run off this process and will scrub the plaque off your arterial walls. That would be the killer app.

    Yes, and when they break down and start clogging your arteries with silicon and steel, it may truly become (at least in the beginning) a truly killer app.

    Sarcasm aside, though, this idea certainly shows a great deal of promise. Heart disease as we know it may be drastically reduced. I'm all for it if it works properly.

  70. 2000 calories/day - watts. by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Theoretically, this technology (aka "Dracucell") could produce 100 watts. power.


    In other words, on a 2000 kilocalories/day diet...

    1 kilowatthour = 860 kilocalories.
    2000/860 = 2.3 kilowatt hours
    2300 watts-hours/24hours = 96 watts.

    Pretty amazing that we humans only run on 96 watts of power.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by feagle814 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that we use up oxygen as well.

    2. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Yes but Oxygen isn't a fuel.

      We need oxygen only so the food we eat can "combust" to produce energy from it. Any form of combustion, be they fossil fuels or otherwise, needs oxygen.

      In our case, and many others, the oxygen combines with Carbon in our "fuel" for a Carbon Dioxide byproduct.

    3. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by NoData · · Score: 1


      Yup, except, the power consumption of the human body isn't determined by energy input but by energy expenditure. But 2000 kcalories for the relatively sedentary *cough* Slashdotter *cough* person is about right. The average resting metabolic rate is about 1800 kcalories per day (for a 150lb male under 40yrs). That's if he doesn't nothing but lie around breathe all day.

      Of course, as amazing as just running on 100W is, most of us are blessed with wonderfully efficient metabolism so that our bodies actually get a surplus of glucose energy! That's why have these wonderful adipose batteries in our asses.

      "It's not a spare tire, it's a spare battery"

    4. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, You do get energy from O2. You get the enrgy that is the difference betweeen O2 chemical bonds and CO or CO2 bonds. It is more than just a catalyst. Where do you think the energy comes from?

    5. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by endersdad · · Score: 1

      Finally an answer the the question
      "How many watts are you?"
      that tormented my grade-school years.

      Jason Watts

    6. Re:2000 calories/day - watts. by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Dude, how do you think they determine the calorie content of food? They put it in a calorometer, burn it with O2, and measure the heat coming out.

  71. From on AC to another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sweet.
    I wish you could write such beautiful and challenging prose under a nick, but we already know the weak would eat you alive.

    --
    me

  72. No go without elaborate glucose level controls. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Low glucose levels are not a good thing, ask any diabetic. The first thing that tips you off is a headache. 100 watts is one heck of alot of drain. Though I dought whether this level of out put can last for more than a few seconds considering the human uses only a fraction of that to power muscles and biosystems combined. Even when we are working really hard our bodies are extreemly thrifty. As glucose levels drop we become dizzy and disoriented. If the liver can keep up glucose production then the effect passes. The feed back loop of hormones in a healthy individual then signals for more glucose production and the insulin cycle continues.
    This system would put one hell of a strain on the cycle and would make you tired so fast it could not be practical without some form of glucose level feed back that would shut it down if the levels got too low. Having the person quickly faint from low blood sugar levels is entirely possible. Though some ./ers most likely know that if you hack for 24 hrs straight you can get a hell of a head ache without doing much physical labour. What am I saying, the one thing programmers try to avoid at all cost is real work. Most IT managers think that humans do not really need work breaks. Coke 'n pizza and give 'r does not work if you use muscles.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  73. why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by peccary · · Score: 4, Funny

    the efficiency of conversion of biomass to energy by the human metabolism is very, very, poor. It's not that the oxidation of glucose is so inefficient, it's that there's so much energy spent digesting food to glucose in the first place.

    Chickens and rabbits do much better. But then, what kind of a movie would it be if Keanu Reeves was trying to free acres and acres of penned hens? I know, it's about his speed. He'd probably get an Oscar for best supporting actor.

    Er, as I was saying, the human body is not a very efficient producer of energy, and the amount of fossil fuels used to produce our food is staggering.

    What would be more useful, in terms of the worlds energy demands, is if these guys could *reverse* the process... By putting energy IN to the metabolism, synthesise glucose from H20 and C02. Ideally, the energy source would be good old solar insolation on exposed skin.

    So, lay around in the backyard naked for a few hours and save the money you would have had to spend on doughnuts.

    This isn't too incredibly speculative, plenty of organisms do this already. The downside is, you'd probably be green, but if everyone was green, it wouldn't be so bad.

    1. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by ramk13 · · Score: 1

      Do all the people suggesting the electron to glucose idea not realize there's already something that does this...

      PLANTS!

    2. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Green babes? Whoohoo, all my trekkie fantasies about to become true :)

      Of course I still be a geek but in star trek geeks get the girls.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by ddimas · · Score: 1

      It's been done. However, organisms that take that route tend to discard now useless things like legs and brains.

    4. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same tech should be useable in plants, then you can grow your own solar cells. For that matter, electric eels can do pretty much the same thing using all-organic components. A little bit of judicious splicing and you you need no "manufactured" components at all (eliminating all the nasty byproducts). Plant with a red spot on one side and a black spot on the other side, jab leads into them and get power (wire in series and parallel as needed). When it dies, feed it to a cow.

      Howzat for green power?

    5. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, yes, I think they know that. See the grandparent:

      "This isn't too incredibly speculative, plenty of organisms do this already. The downside is, you'd probably be green, but if everyone was green, it wouldn't be so bad."

      That's photons to glucose, but it's the same general idea.

    6. Re:why the premise of the Matrix is so dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you invented the current bush.

  74. Weight-loss applications by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    Having devices leeching off your blood glucose supply would effectively boost the rate at which you're burning calories, forcing your body to break down fat to maintain blood sugar levels, without the nasty side effects of all those stimulant-based weight-loss pills on the market today.

  75. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can build killer robots powered by this.

  76. Re:ASK SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doh! Sorry, the Jap's device doesn't work with nigger blood. better luck next time.

  77. Dieting? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this could replace dieting as a new drug to lose weight. All you need are some nanomachines that run on this and use up the excess energy. They could putter around your bloodstream cleaning plaque from your arteries and fixing that whole "heart murmur from being so obese" thing, all while burning more calories than you would excercising.

    Or, for those of us that are more concerned with being weak & a bit chubby (rather than dangerously obese), they could build muscle tissue (easiest way I'd guess would be to selectively kill muscle cells slower than your body can repair them. Glucose -> heat energy. the heat destroys individual muscle cells slowly) while burning excess calories.
    Step 3: PROFIT!! (if someone was selling an injection that meant I'd have to eat a bit more but it'd make me all ripped without the hassle of excercise, I'd be all over that)

    This does beg the question though, of how to kill off the nanomachines before you become Ahhh-nold (or Calista Flockhart)

  78. 25 cents by Elpacoloco · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the colas I speak of are no-names that they sell in supermarket vending machines. And if you could buy them in bulk they'd be even cheaper than that.

  79. "Even certain birds can solve puzzles"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be a coward! If you mean chickens, say chickens!

  80. Rather than installing this in myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would prefer to develop a MUCH more symbiotic relationship with my lazy cats

  81. make way for fully autonomus and unobtrusive by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0

    synthetic organs.....

    it is to bad that we will be growing new organs from Bone marrow of the patient in 5 years or so. this tech would have been nice 20 years ago.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  82. The Cons of this by Honor · · Score: 1

    Although i can see this as a good thing as far as weight loss and diebetics, it could also be a bad thing. people who are anorexic or bulimic could now eat whatever they wanted and still lose the weight. they wouldn't have to work out, throw up, and they could eat constantly. and also, if everybody could eat whatever they wanted whenever they wanted, the demand on our economy for certain foods would increase tenfold. imagine if everybody bought pringles, ice cream, cakes, cookies, you name it, whatever your fav. food is, it would always be out of stock. while this would give our economy a boost for a short period, it would soon become a liability. not only would there be a shortage of all the good food, there would be many health problems too. i imagine people would sell the power their body produced, so if those people are desperate enough, they could kill themselves by depriving their bodies of glucose. the ramifications of this, when put in this light, are severe, especially on our society today which focuses on skinny girls and is also very power-hungry. i think, even if it donsn't create a Matrix for real, it could still ruin the world as we know it.

  83. 100W, what about the heat? by j3110 · · Score: 1

    What are they going to do for the heat 100W of electricity usage is going to create? Ever touch a 100W lightbulb or your processor? Does it come with a heatsinc and a fan powered by more glucose?

    I love the idea of using those bear calories for the SETI project :)

    --
    Karma Clown
    1. Re:100W, what about the heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Liquid cooling - one of the uses of blood is to regulate temperature.

      It's a complex cooling system, move blood near surface to cool (ever get flushed when you run?) and use evaporative cooling, sweat, to boost the effect.

      The advantage is that the cooling system is already installed.

  84. Type 2... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a type 2 with excess glucose, it's possible this device burning off the extra could do something. However, in a type 1, with a body not producing insulin, you'd still end up with a dead diabetic. Type 1's need insulin to properly fuel the body, not just dump the fuel.

    1. Re:Type 2... maybe by Sandb · · Score: 1

      Just a device that is able to monitor your glucose level continuously, like say, trough a wireless connection with your PDA or even your watch would be a tremendous advancement. Such a device could e.g. warn you when your glucose level is too low or too high by sounding an alarm and possible (if you are asleep for example) save your life... Defenitely worth some research...

  85. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    I so want one of these... I don't care what I hook it up to. Even if I just dump the energy into heat, that's fine. A toasty heatsink (with red LED) to warm my hands in the winter or a Peltier device (and accompanyting blue LED) to cool my forehead in summer, either would be cool.

    > Of course, a possible application could be using to power RF tags for endangered species

    ...and then you come up with an even cooler application.

    Active RF homing tags!

    Start with common critters (testing), expand to endangered critters and pets, then felons, then the broader human population.

    I wonder if you could hack this thing to power a mini-GPS receiver (antenna could be crafted like a metal plates used in peoples' heads). GPS receiver twiddles a few bits in a subcutaneous microtransmitter. A network of receivers (deployed every 10-20 meters, say, every street lamp) relays userid/location data to a network of relatively centralized (every few square kilometers) servers. Central servers share/broadcast location of everyone - to everyone.

    Right now, you'd still need an external display (or head-mounted display) to read that location data and display it on a map to know where you and your friends were. But in 10-15 years, when the graphics can be rendered in wetware (blood-glucose-powered retinal implant), the infrastructure for 24/7 real-time personal location awareness / HUD display will already be in place. w00t!

  86. This is NOT the Matrix by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    They don't need to put you in stasis, they just need your blood.

    However, it is leeching off humans for energy. The similarity is both stunning and macabre.

    Now if they implement this and some dude in a long black coat rebels and starts kicking slow motion ass I'm gonna freak...

  87. Throw away this research! by thinkerdreamer · · Score: 1

    What a waste of time and money! The actual application for this research is for marketing. Their knowledge of physiology is pitiful. The body wasn't meant to have the extra stress of another sythetic glucose dependant organ. People would die if they put this into practice. You want to create less stress in patients with heart disease, not more. Anyone want to die a little faster? This is stupid.

    1. Re:Throw away this research! by Urkki · · Score: 1
      Hmm mm. I'm sure there's an easy way to increase blood sugar level... Let me think... "e-a-t-i-n-g"... Yes, that's it, Eating!

      Seriously, if extra blood sugar consumpiton is a problem for some reason (digestion problems? diabetes? what?), then just letting glucose tablets (just special candy really!) to melt in your mouth and the glucose to get absorbed starting from mouth should fix that easily.

      Low blood sugar level doesn't make you tired, it makes you hungry. Glucose using machines would not put extra strain in the body, they would just reduce blood sugar level. If you do something to offset that (like eat more), then I don't see how your body would even notice that extra glucose consumption.

    2. Re:Throw away this research! by thinkerdreamer · · Score: 1

      Why I came on so strong is that an extra glucose using machine would cause hypoglycemia. You don't want to treat a disease by causing another one. Trust me. That is a major mistake of modern medicine. I view such a thing as unethical. The hypocratic oath says to do "no harm." No one wants a doctor to be hypocritical (pardon the pun).

      Just eating will not work. Sorry. You'll get very fat that way. It would seem that the body would use all its energy supplies and not create fat, but it does. I haven't yet learned why.

      Obesity causes you to have a high mortality rate making you 2 to 3 times more likely to develop another major health problem. Losing weight is usually the best thing you can do for your body to live a healthly life.

      Hypoglycemia causes other health problems even effecting the mind with chronic disease. I have read there are 60 mental diseases that may be caused by hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia does even cause fatigue, it doesn't just make you hungry. Fatigue usually sets in when cancer and other major diseases reak havoc on your body. This proves the body is recieving phenomenal stress. Anyone that tells you that hypoglycemia doesn't cause fatigue hasn't thoroughly talked with hypogycemics. That is a chief complaint.

      Surely you don't want to be hypoglycemic.

      As for diabetes, there more than likely other ways to treat that without using modern drugs or this crazy device. I trully don't agree that the origin (besides genetics) is the pancreas and insulin levels. It is an oversimplification. A good rule of thumb is if the modern treatment of a disease is bad, scientists knowledge of that disease is faulty. You can treat almost anything, well, if you put your mind to it. They haven't yet so we are considering this of-the-wall device. It is kind of nuts.

    3. Re:Throw away this research! by Urkki · · Score: 1
      Just eating will not work. Sorry. You'll get very fat that way. It would seem that the body would use all its energy supplies and not create fat, but it does. I haven't yet learned why.

      Well, I suppose body will try to create fat whenever it has the chance, to have that spare fuel reserve. Until very recently (100-50 years in industrialized countries? In some parts of the world still today?) that was a very good survival trait, because there was high likelyhood of long perioids (eg winters after bad summer) with not enough food. And of course in colder climes (and in water) fat is excellent thermal insulation, so having healthy amount of fat around the body was probalby good just about always, while average living conditions made sure that there wasn't much chance of getting too fat.

      Anyway, back to topic. The suggestion of glucose pills would still work, or diet which produces a lot of glucose directly to food (I mean what's the difference from the point of view of these glucose-machines?). The machines take glucose out of blood, while user puts extra glucose to blood.

      Now please explain how the body knows there's more total glucose? I'm pretty sure it does not measure how much glucose is brought into the system, it can only measure the curren glucose level in the blood. So more consumption directly from blood + extra glucose input is no different than normal consumption + normal glucose input. I don't see how body could even notice the change, let alone get hypoglycemia... AFAIK glucose can be absorbed even directly from mouth to blood already, so getting that extra glucose in shouldn't be a problem no matter what the persons condition.

      I mean... consider that person excercises and gets stronger heart. Now logically (ie I could be wrong) that stronger heart uses more energy at all times. Now take a weaker heart + glucose-powered implant, which would use exactly the same amount of glucose than the stronger heart alone. What's the critical difference that makes the implant "harmful"?

      And even if user would have to be real careful to keep the glucose levels normal (though I imagine these devices use tiny amounts compared to normal body functions), with this technology you could even have glucose powered blood sugar level indicators, with embedded indicators (leds or vibrators). Indicator notifies the person, who pops a glucose pill into his mouth. Might as well have a lot of other indicators there too, to warn about too high heart rate, alcohol or caffeine content out of specified boundaries... ;-)

      Of course any other issues common to all implants would apply to devices using this technology, but I really don't see how extra sugar consumption would even be noticed by the body, or if it is that big, how it couldn't be fixed with extra glucose input. But I'm no expert.

    4. Re:Throw away this research! by thinkerdreamer · · Score: 1

      What really matters is how much glucose it uses. If it uses a tiny amount, yes, it might have potential. But if it hogs glucose, hypoglycemia can be very dangerous.

      You talk about eating more. Eating more will solve the problem if you are on a schedule and you eat a lot of protein. (Glucose tablets are only for hypoglycemic attacks. You only use them for a quick jumpstart. Then you eat long lasting protein and complex carbohydrates.) But, most people don't like to eat on a schedule or don't know when to eat to raise blood sugar. Of course technology could tell you when to eat (wirelessly). That still won't solve the problem of an unscheduled eating pattern.

      Now you speculate that a weaker heart uses less glucose. Consider this: Cortisol controls heart processes as well as glucose metabolism. (This is common knowledge you can find in a physiology book.) So fluctuating cortisol levels can effect not only the heart but create hypoglycemia. So you can have a poor heart and hypoglycemia. That is why this technology is dangerous.

      All I can see from this technology is more stress on the pancreas producing diabetes. Hypoglycemia many times goes into diabetes. Most doctors do not know why. If it was somehow powered by free radicals, that would be beneficial, but glucose? No way. Powering it with glucose will only harm the patient. I think many doctors would agree with me. Hypoglycemia is a logical outcome of using this technology.

  88. MEET THE FRIENDLY FOLKS AT THE BPAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Join BPAA Today!

    BPAA (BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which gathers BISEXUAL POLYNESIANS from all over America and abroad for one common goal: Being BISEXUAL POLYNESIANS.

    Are you BISEXUAL?
    Are you a POLYNESIAN?
    Are you a BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN?

    If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then BPAA (BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for! Join BPAA (BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time BPAA member.
    BPAA (BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of BPAA if you join today!

    Why not? It's quick and easy--only 2 simple steps!

    Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

    If you are having trouble locating #BPAA, the official BISEXUAL POLYNESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.isprime.com as one of the EFNet servers.

    If you have mod points and would like to support BPAA, please moderate this post up.

    This post brought to you by a proud member of BPAA

    ` __________________________________________________ ______
    | ______________________________________._a,________ _____ |
    | _________________________aj#0s_____aWY!400._______ _____ |
    | __ad#7!!*P_____.d#0a____#!-_#0i___.#!__W#0#_______ _____ |
    | _j#'___0#,___4#dP_"#,__j#,__0#Wi___*00P!_"#L,_____ _____ |
    | _"#g____01___"#01__40,_"4Lj#!_4#g_________"01_____ _____ |
    | __oe__tyugk____*@`gpdNl_______-!^_________________ _____ |
    | ___lkp____ghq___pTW_______________________________ _____ |
    | ____mw_____ff___oef_______________________________ _____ |
    | _____er__ww_______________________________________ _____ |
    | ______xde___BISEXUAL_POLYNESIAN_ASSOCIATION_OF_AME RICA_ |
    | __________________________________________________ _____ |
    ` __________________________________________________ ______'

    bpaa representative #648437

  89. This is dangerous by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

    I can envision a dreadful world, in wich most of the energy we produced would go to a government, that would spend it to opress more people.

    oh, wait.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  90. Use it to power gravity altering nanobots by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


    Then with some brain-nanobots interface you can use the nanobots for some parlor tricks and impress the chicks or to change the place where your fat hangs so you have a V shape with the fat shaped as muscles instead of a pear shape (thanks to Vladimir for the idea with the fat).

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  91. How about Knights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Classic C grade movie. Bloodsucking, vampire cyborgs.

  92. Combine this with wearable computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please?

    I want to be a cyborg within two years, not one hundred.

  93. Powered by blood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought those big SUVs where powered with blood.

    Then someone explained to me that you don't actually pour the dead people's blood into the engine, you bury those bodies and then use their oil.

    I was like oh ok, killing people for oil, that's fine, but actually using the blood?! Eww grody! You're supposed to let that drain into the sand so it doesn't make a nasty smell around the oil well.

  94. It's not easy being green... by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    Even better - use an algae suspension to produce glucose from the sun, then convert that glucose to electrical enercy.

    There you go - a natural solar panel!

    1. Re:It's not easy being green... by trisweb · · Score: 1

      One problem: I don't think that extra glucose is a by-product of Algae's photosythesis... if I know nature, I'd bet the algae has just the right balance of glucose for it to survive and reproduce.

      But I wouldn't put it beyond someone to genetically engineer an algae to produce extra glucose... or better yet, Hydrogen gas, which I believe is in development. <sarcasm> And, of course, nothing can go wrong with the gene splicing -- we know everything about genetic engineering these days. </sarcasm>

      And on a minor sub note, how did the grandparent get modded Funny?

      --
      "!"
  95. Speaking of blood... by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    I just saw the Seinfeld where Kramer fills Jerry's radiator will his blood.... now THAT's being powered by blood!

  96. Yeah! by DaBj · · Score: 1

    What he said!

    --
    "GNU's not Unix....it's Linux" / Kami "kokamomi" Petersen
  97. vibrator implants... by jamesh · · Score: 1

    ... will really help you pleasure the ladies. :)

  98. becoming robots by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Here's step one of humans becoming robots. I better go practice speaking in monotone! ;)

  99. How many by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can see the jokes already:

    How many airplane pilots does it take to power a laptop?
    None. The use of laptops and other portable electronic devices is strictly prohibited during take-off and landing, acording to FAA regulations.

    How many MIT students does it take to power a laptop?
    Ten. One to blood power it while the others project a more efficient system.

    How many Peta members does it take to power a laptop?
    Two. One to power it and another to make sure they're not using the blood of any animal.

    How many quantum mechanicians does it take to power a laptop ?
    They can't. If they know where the power cord is, they cannot locate the plug. (BTW, where in the body would a power plug fit?)

    How many Heisenbergs does it take to power a laptop?
    If you know the number, you don't know where the laptop is.

    How many women does it take to power a laptop?
    No way. It's a man's job.

    How many amish people does it take to power a laptop?
    None. Amish people don't believe in Laptops.

    How many Sysadmins does it take to power a laptop?
    I'm sorry, that's a hardware issue and we can't help you with it. You'll have to get a hardware tech to power it. Good luck.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    1. Re:How many by nzyank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Q. How many US soldiers does it take to power a laptop? A. 50,001 - one to power it and 50,000 to search for the WMD Saddam's going to use to stop him.

    2. Re:How many by nzyank · · Score: 1

      Q. How many GW Bush's does it take to power a laptop.
      A. 18 - one for the blood draw and 17 to find the clearly labeled on/off switch

    3. Re:How many by nzyank · · Score: 1

      Q. How many thoughtful Slashdot Editors does it take to power a laptop?
      A. Say what?

    4. Re:How many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How many posts does it take nzyank to score a karma point?
      A: Sorry, trick question. He never will.

  100. Cool! by El · · Score: 1

    Can those of us with Diabetes now sell our excess blood sugar to the power grid?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  101. Another source of human power. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    The Dutch understood the power of wind, why not build a methane powered biocell. Implanting it would be interesting. There are time when I feel the need to do something about the potential myself.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  102. Regulation by sardonic_catharsis · · Score: 1

    The diabetes comments bring up an interesting point. If the enzyme renders glucose useless to the body, then its level would probably have to be regulated like insulin (although I would not be disinclined to drink a coke every hour or so to keep my bio devices working). Does anyone know of a control mechanism that could help overcome this problem?

  103. Or you could always.... by nzyank · · Score: 1

    ... sit on a stationary bicycle with a generator attached and generate 200 Watts without poking holes in your arm. Better for you, too.

  104. The matrix wasn't far off by panic911 · · Score: 1

    Oh great, vampire robots.. so when the robots decide to take over, they're going to slaughter humans left and right to get their blood.

    1. Re:The matrix wasn't far off by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

      I can just see White Wolf now... after at last killing off WoD they decide to create a future-alternate-WoD where Vampiric Robots are running an underground war against genetic-engineered-lycanthropes... on second thoughts I copyright that idea... mmm "cash cow"!!! ;-)

      --

      How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

  105. one word: by condour75 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    assPod.

  106. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pyruvate means "penis enlarger" in schatsyvanlivotiachian.

  107. conservation of energy by trouser · · Score: 1

    The amount of energy derived from the sugar in your blood could not exceed the amount of energy in the food you ate to put the sugar in your body in the first place. This is something that bugged me a little with the humans-as-batteries Matrix scenario. All those humans had to be fed something to keep them alive and the food could probably have been converted to power or stored without the use of a human body. Also, why was it necessary to keep the minds of the human batteries alive? Why not just surgically or chemically suppress brain activity or even genetically engineer a new breed of brainless humans (Epsilon Minus Semi-Morons ??) to use as batteries? And why, in the Matrix Reloaded, were agents driving conventional cars able to keep up with Trinity when she was riding a Ducati? Do you have any idea how fast those bikes are? This isn't some Harley cruiser. The acceleration is breathtaking and the top speed is probably somewhere in the vicinity of 300Kmh. I think it was a 996 she was riding. Here are some mouth watering specs I googled for the 996.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
    1. Re:conservation of energy by nzyank · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just checked my copy and it's labeled as 'fiction'. Does that help?

    2. Re:conservation of energy by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that doesn't make it a prerequisite to assume that the audience is braindead. The only way they can save that ridiculous storyline (I'm not that good at suspending my disbelief - got to draw the line somewhere...) and make it even remotely plausible is if it turns out that the whole "humans as batteries" thing is just fiction inside another matrix.

  108. Check out the title bar... by trisweb · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Slashdot | Powered by Blood"

    'Nuff said.

    --
    "!"
  109. 100 SERIES by Magic+Thread · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:100 SERIES by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

      Oh..........

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  110. Evolving Invention by Spintronic · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was an extensive article on this in the Feb 2003 issue of Scientific American. Very interesting stuff. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00073FC E-F36F-1E19-8B3B809EC588EEDF&pageNumber=1&catI D=2

    1. Re:Evolving Invention by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

      Hey, could you post the full text? I don't have a subscription to the digital thing, only the paper copy, and only since june.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  111. 100 SERIES by Magic+Thread · · Score: 1
  112. Methane production might be more efficient by nzyank · · Score: 1

    How about a steady diet of beans and an attachment to our exhaust end to power a methane/oxygen generator?

  113. I thought BPAA stood for... by nzyank · · Score: 1

    Benevolent Protectorate of American Assholes? Oh well...live and learn.

  114. Poll Suggustion by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
    My Computer's powersupply:

    • 250Watt AC-DC power supply
    • 300Watt AC-DC power supply
    • 350Watt AC-DC power supply
    • Direct hookup to power grid
    • Direct hookup to CowboyNeil

    Nahh

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  115. How about the opposite? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >The process the researchers have come up with probably uses the same effect to produce a current.

    I wonder if this research can lead into the electricity in -> ATP/Glucose out.

    People powering PDAs with a little blood or spit is cute, people running on electricity no farms, no food, no obesity, etc would be revolutionary.

    1. Re:How about the opposite? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      This is a very interesting idea which deserves some thought.

      If the devices were some kind of nanotechnology which would live near the surface of our skin, we could become solar powered =)

      Well, the geeks would probably not be, but they could always use different nanos which would work off magnetic induction (from all of the computer equipment) =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:How about the opposite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, converting electricity into sugar seems valuable in the same sense that converting gold to lead would be. One of the problems with electric cars (besides the lack of workable batteries...) is that you still have to generate the electricity to power them. The problem with that is there are no true clean ways (except dams) to create electricity. On the other hand, raising crops and other food is comparatively easy, and it's certainly not bad on the environment (except pesticides).

      So, it would seem that converting to sugar to electricity would be a more valuable thing. One could imagine a a forest of maple trees, each with a small tap to slowly draw out syrup and create electricity. Beats solar cells by a long shot because: (1) the cost to build them is small -- just plant a sapling and wait, (2) you can store up syrup reserves and create electricity at night or on cloudy days, (3) environmentally friendly -- should you have to dispose of the "power plant" (sorry, couldn't resist), just make some furniture out of it, (4) definitely a damn sight prettier than a bunch of black panels.

      Plus, imagine the benefits for workers in the power generation industry if conEdison turns into Johnny Appleseed. Instead of doing some hazardous job inside a big monstrous concrete power plant, the worker's new job is to walk around in the forest and take care of the trees and maybe live in a log cabin or something. Can you beat that?

    3. Re:How about the opposite? by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      The problem with that is there are no true clean ways (except dams) to create electricity.

      Umm, windmills, solar cells, geo-thermal ...

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    4. Re:How about the opposite? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      One could imagine a a forest of maple trees, each with a small tap to slowly draw out syrup and create electricity

      I think using a bee hive would be better, as all the glucose would be in one compact place and you would have to have heaps of flowers to power it (which would be nice).

    5. Re:How about the opposite? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I tried looking but couldn't find it; there was an old sci-fi book or movie or something that contained children who had been genetically modified to produce chlorophyll in their skin, giving them a green tint.

      I think it said that it didn't provide anything more than a supplement to their normal diet. Obviously, we couldn't really be 'solar-powered' because of the huge amounts of energy required to sustain ourselves.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  116. I'll pitch that movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But then, what kind of a movie would it be if Keanu Reeves was trying to free acres and acres of penned hens?

    Sounds like a pitch from The Player:

    "It's a great film: 'The Matrix' meets 'Chicken Run'!"

    I guess you had to be there.

  117. Good for low power devices by Little+Brother · · Score: 3, Informative
    OK, as many (perhaps to many) of you have pointed out, using enough glucose out of the human bloodstream to get 100W would be a bad thing(tm). However, the story isn't talking about taking 100W from the bloodstream, its talking about making devices that can transform glucose from many sources into electrictity. One of the mentioned applications is sugar-powered robots, in this situation it wouldn't be a problem to draw 100W, also let's not forget about larger than human sized animals. You probably wouldn't be nice if you got 100W even from an elephant, but slightly smaller amounts of power should be ok.

    Most importantly, the whole laptop thing is a joke, this is not intended to power a laptop people. If used inside the human body, this would be to power nanomachiens (almost no power drain) and medical implants (which don't draw huge amounts of power either).

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

    1. Re:Good for low power devices by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Actually, 100W is equivalent to about 2000 kcal/day. It would be a fairly big deal, but not beyond what a fit person could handle (at least while you're awake). I imagine it would be hardly noticable for an elephant.

    2. Re:Good for low power devices by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      Hmm you obviously have the details down better than I do. I'm running from a gut feeling here, but would the body not have problems regulating the bloodsugar levels with this kind of drain outside of normal channels? Would you need some kind of insulin production inhibitor drug?

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  118. Two words: by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 1

    weight loss.

    Imagine a device that can burn off your excess calories...

  119. I don't think so. by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 2, Funny

    You said "watching movies in the palm of your hand..."
    Sorry dude, but I need my palms while watching movies. Ok, I can sacrifice one palm. nevermind.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  120. bio-nano fuel cells by nevada-bill · · Score: 1

    He believed bio-nano fuel cells were the next step for researchers after generators powered by hydrogen, natural gas and methanol now being developed for the car and energy industries.

    Crap! Now I'll have to feed my car?

  121. Controlling the blood sugar level by vindaci · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this device can purposely "waste" the glucose in the blood to control the blood sugar level? It could help those who are diabetic. Imagine no more need to "control" the blood sugar level, but just eating as much sugar as you want and let the machine lower the blood sugar to the proper level.

    I also wonder if it'd be possible to use the same technique to make a person thinner? :P

  122. MODS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Informative? INFORMATIVE?

  123. Obligatory matrix quote: by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    And the machines had found... (dramatic pause) all the energy they would ever need.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  124. ObSF: Synners, Pat Cadigan by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Now you can be the ass-to-risk.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  125. Powering a laptop by icleprechauns · · Score: 1
    Now how many of you Slashdotters would it take to power my laptop?


    I'm shooting for maybe 3 /.'ers per second, unless you have Centrino, of course...
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  126. Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't this topic be under The Matrix, not just Science and IT?

  127. Beer ate my uptime! by khaine · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine trying to explain to my boss that I couldn't finish my report on the train as I'd been out on the lash the night before and didn't have enough power to run my laptop ;-)

    PS Lash = British extreme drinking session

  128. Seanbaby's vision of doom! by tedrlord · · Score: 1

    This is perhaps the most frightening news I've read in years. Now that robots will be able to feast on our very blood, there is nothing that can stop them! We must listen to Seanbaby and fight back against the robot scourge before it is too late!

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
    1. Re:Seanbaby's vision of doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the same article, but with pictures of Seanbaby's fight against the robot scourge!

  129. Hmm... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Blood powered cyber-battle-cows? Ooh... gotta get me a few of those!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Hmm... by bmongar · · Score: 1

      Ever play battlecattle? It's a dice, mini, and paper game based on battling cyber cows.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    2. Re:Hmm... by mink · · Score: 1

      I like Unexploded Cow better, solves the Mad cow problem and the left over WWII munitions problem in one explosion.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  130. You have to be open to change. by nasor · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, would like to extend a warm welcome to our new robot-vampire overlords. I would also like to remind them that I should not be drained immediately, as I can be useful to them in rounding up other humans to toil in their underground silicon mines.

  131. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by IICV · · Score: 1

    Yes! And you can make people's names float over their heads, just like in an FPS! And then you can blow them away, and they'll respawn at the nearest cloning centre! It's genious, I tell you!

  132. Ooohhh. That sounds bad. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Just, um, please don't make any autonomous machines that run on the stuff, mmkay?

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  133. Alarm light for over earing by rve · · Score: 1

    Chubby people could use it to power a lightbulb on the head, both to burn some extra calories without getting tired, and as a warning light that you are eating too much if it shines too brightly.

  134. Re:Human Arrogance (wasRe:The Matrix is just a mov by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

    45..

    46..

    47..

    Oh hey, don't mind me. I'm just counting all the different ways I'm learning to spell "intelligence"

    48..

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  135. stupidly WASTES glucose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but do you have *any* idea how effecient the human body is? It's about 85% effecient in terms of potential energy in -> energy out, compared to a whopping 18% for a vehicle with an internal combustion engine. There's nothing ineffecient about biology.

  136. Next development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A device that turns fat into electricity.
    I guess most of us will have free power for lifetime.

  137. Re:Human Arrogance (wasRe:The Matrix is just a mov by Placido · · Score: 1

    What's the definition of intelligence?

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  138. Logos vs. Eros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the materialistic assumption that 'logos' is the foundation of truth and reality in this universe and that 'eros' is merely its subservient and irrelevant epiphenomenon? My *eperience* of both is equally compelling and I have no good "reason" or "argument" to suggest that logos is in some sense dominant (indeed such a "reason" or "argument" would be by definition circular).In other words:

    GOD:
    Your life is the sum of the remainder of an unbalanced equation inherant to the programming of
    the matrix. You are the eventuality of an anomaly which despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision [...] As you
    are undoubtedly gathering the anomaly is systemic creating fluctuations in even the most simplistic equations ...

    YOU:
    Choice. The problem is choice.

  139. Potential for weight loss? by Ritontor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would this sort of thing work with regards to burning your excess fat? does the human body convert stored fats into glucose before it utilizes them for energy? would plugging a machine like this into you allow you to eat essentially ANYTHING, and the only difference is the amount of power it could syphon off? i'm seeing a massive potential for these devices in the weight loss industry...

    --
    Perhaps the answer to the problem of teenagers dropping bricks from motorway and railway bridges is to sue Tetris.
    1. Re:Potential for weight loss? by elflord · · Score: 1
      How would this sort of thing work with regards to burning your excess fat?

      I would imagine it would be quite useful. A friend an I were discussing, in jest, a similar idea not that long ago -- we were trying to compute how long a colleagues lunch would be able to power his PDA for. It would be a win-win: the human body is a pretty efficient machine in terms of metabolising fuel.

      Now the human body does not store glucose as fat. However, the rate at which you burn fat is affected by blood glucose levels, so by burning glucose, you are forcing your body to get more energy from fat.

    2. Re:Potential for weight loss? by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone of "larger than most" girth (more commonly known as "so large Greenpeace keeps putting me back in the water everytime I go sun-bathing,") I would REALLY welcome this kinda tech.

      Imagine it being able to sit around all day, playing games, watching DVDs and knowing that my snakcing was powering its systems... ah the poetic nature of it all and with my excess fat content I think I would even give that cursed Duracell Bunny a go! ;-)

      --

      How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

  140. As long as he's offering... by Spunk · · Score: 1

    I bid five dollars!

  141. Power other devices? by thbigr · · Score: 1

    Could this be used as a battery and all I have to do is dump in sugar?

    --
    Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
  142. i'd blow the fuse.. by guest12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    when my BP shoots up as she snuggles close

  143. Almost right... by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find that a wench and rack does it for me...

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  144. HyperMetabolism & weighing same since 11th gra by adzoox · · Score: 1
    There are 2 types of and different levels of diabetes. One is; Hypoglycemia, the other is; HyperGlycemia. Hypo - not enough Hyper - too much. The problem with diabetics is that their bodies essentially treat glucose like cocaine or heroine. Provides a high and a means for energy but only in temporary spikes. If you have ever seen the movie Hollow Man, think of Diabetes in the same way the scientists were seeing the "invisibility" in that movie. You are essentially invisible (to medications), there are are no cures, only those 98% solutions, that break down at the very last second - helping to prolong your life and reduce side effects, but no real cure.

    I have a "mutated form" of diabetes - I have a hypermetabolism. It's effect has been slenderness on me. I am not skinny, in fact, I am just under atheletic and toned looking, but I am almost 30 and weigh the exact same as I did in 11th grade 165 (6'1") - I eat 4 large meals a day and snack most all day. That said, I am very active. I metabolize most everything I take in and don't use the restroom but 3-4 times a week (for 1 AND 2) - no constipation - I have to go get biannual checkups. Contact me if you'd like to know more.

    You are on to something about it having the effect of making you slimmer - but we ALL already have that in our systems - I think some of us just have a Honda blood engine and some of us have a Ferrari blood engine ;)

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  145. Wow by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Combine this with a form of fusion, well, I bet we could start some shit. We wouldn't even need the sun anymore.

    What did that mean anyway "Combined with a source of fusion"...Why not JUST USE FUSION? Rather than running that whole scam trying to make people slaves. Works OK for the sun.

  146. Logos is bigger by UberQwerty · · Score: 1

    I have no good "reason" or "argument" to suggest that logos is in some sense dominant

    Doesn't the fact that Eros is only known to "exist" on the surface of the earth, which is dwarfed a trillion times over by the size of just the galaxy it's in, give you any clues?

    GOD: You take the blue pill, you wake up embedded in an ignorant and solipsist society, and believe in whatever eros you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in reality, and discover for yourself that it doesn't matter in the slightest whether you believe in me or not.

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  147. Sounds reasonable. by Jaywalk · · Score: 1

    Programmers have been running on Jolt for years, now it can run their computers as well.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  148. Does it have to be in the blood? by Edgester · · Score: 1

    One step closer to nanites in the human body.

    Hey, if this thing runs off glucose, does it have to be in blood? Could I just have a sugar-powered car? Just think, gas up the car and have a couple of mouthfuls for myself. One for me... one for the car... once for me....

  149. In other news... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

    Sacramento

    Governor Grey Davis of California today proposed a controversial plan to ease the state's energy woes by placing a 10% tax on all blood donations. The controversial part is that it is 10% of the blood itself that is to be turned over to the state. "This is a way for patriotic Californians to help others," said the Governor, "and I hope to get some value out our burgeoning homeless population." An annonymous source in the Governor's office claimed Davis, who had been depressed over calls for his ouster because of bizzare policy decisions, became excited about the idea after reading an article on Slashdot, a nerdy-geek web site.

    "The Linux community, having made it clear they consider most people too stupid to use Linux, tried again today to figure out why Microsoft is so popular..."

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  150. Scientific Debate? by joaodk · · Score: 1
    ...The ideal of a "soul" is actually fable/fiction/pure speculation, and does not deserve to be included in a scientific debate.

    Hmmm... I dont recall ever seeing a slashdot rule stating that all discussions should be conducted in a scientific fashion.

    Gee, the fact we can't have an accurate logical description about something doesnt mean we shouldnt talk about it. In fact, I guess its the other way round. It is important not to run from this issues.

  151. Boon for Diabetics? by soup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would this be another way to manage blood sugar for diabetics?

    --
    -soup (GNUrd, Speaker to Machines) "Laugh at yourself- Why should everyone else have all the fun?" -Romanchek's 6th Ru
  152. Re:Human Arrogance (wasRe:The Matrix is just a mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the definition of intelligence?

    /usr/bin/perl

    :P

  153. Only one more question about The Matrix by lewko · · Score: 2, Funny
    Okay, now I understand how they got electricity from humans in the Matrix.

    The only thing I still can't figure out is how they got Keanu to act!

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  154. one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coppertop

  155. Weapon Use by Hyresse · · Score: 1

    Step 1. power nano-bots from the chemicles in the blood. Step 2. Create Nano-bots that can increase strength,speed and regeneration. Step 3. Military takes them and adds teeth with a pleasure based paralization drug and makes it so blood from outside sources can be used. Step 4. Name the soldier.. i know.. a Vampire

  156. Weight loss would be primary benefit by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    I'd have to think it great if you could lose weight by sitting and reading a book in a dark room by light generated from the calories already in your system. tone

    --
    tone
  157. Finally implants that don't need repeated surgery! by haggar · · Score: 1

    Implants, pace makers, even artificial hearts! Finally there will be no need to re-open the body to replace the battery, or to have un-hygienic "dongles" with wires going under your skin. This invention is brilliant and extremely usefuly.

    I was surprised you folks have not pointed out this most obviious advantage. But that's why you're not physicians, I guess.

    --
    Sigged!
  158. Size doesn't matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the physical size of phenomena is not necessarily related to any of their complexity / worth / interest / meaning / truth / reality etc!

    My experience of Eros is far more susbstantive and immediate than that of the chain of reasoning of which I'm aware that engenders me to accept certain working hypotheses about the size of the universe.*Maybe* the physical (mathematical?) universe can't be said to properly "exist" without conscious minds to observe it with souls to experience it!

    GOD: Already I can see the chain reaction, the chemical precursors that signal the onset of an emotion, designed specifically to overwhelm logic, and reason. An emotion that is already blinding you from the simple, and obvious truth: she is going to die, and there is nothing that you can do to stop it!

    LUCIFE^W^WNEO: [f*ck your truth, and your red pill, this is *my* truth!]

  159. Robots by Hrolf · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is such big news. Everyone knows that robots are powered by alcohol. These 'scientists' need to get current with 31st century technology.

  160. New power consumption measurements: by Scummer · · Score: 1

    Xscale = Moscito
    Pentium M = Leech
    P4@3GHz = Vampire bat
    Quad Xeon = What the f..??? You are still alive?!?

    --
    The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown
  161. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by smallfries · · Score: 1

    Err, I take it that you know that RF tags don't require any power and that they only work over a few feet. I think you are thinking of something else...

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  162. 386 comments, and not ONE "trickle charge" joke? by mckwant · · Score: 1

    Good grief, some folks must be slow this morning.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  163. Idea for a better plot device by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know why they used the idiotic plot device of the Matrix using people as human batteries. It would've been far more believable if they had the plot be that the Matrix was using the extra processing power of people's brains (whether there really is any extra or not in reality) for its own purposes. It would let people use just enough to live in the Matrix and take the rest. Sort of a giant SETI@home type system. Disconnect enough people and you'd have the Matrix singing "Daisy" before long. Plus you could have little story extras like explaining that inspiration and visions in people are actually due to "bad connections" in their heads (and possibly important loopholes into the system?) and that dreams are Matrix background noise.

    Maybe the idea of people not using all of their brains would be too realistic.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Idea for a better plot device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right on. I like your explanation a lot better. It just makes so much more sense.

  164. weight loss machine by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    Just hook it up and eat all the ice cream you want. It will filter out the glucose! Copyright and patent this at your peril. Steve Guenther Tampa, FL

  165. Correction by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Eat a bowl of Lucky Charms and you'll get at least 200W of glucose power. Plus, they are magically delicious!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  166. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, good thing no one's thought of active RFID tags yet. Oh, oops... dumbass.

  167. At Last by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    An advantage to being diabetic!!! Now I can find a use for all that excess blood sugar!

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  168. oxidant by garns · · Score: 1

    If they are striping the electrons off the glucose molecules then would we be left with a bunch of oxidants floating around in our blood stream? From what I know that is not a good thing, cell damage...

    --
    "My father once told me that respect for the truth comes close to being the basis for all morality." - Muad'Dib
  169. Hacking/cracking will take on a whole new meaning. by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1


    I'm just waiting for the first story of someone's laptop getting 0wn3d by a kid with a hypodermic full of insulin...

  170. The power cell itself just cured diabetes and more by gte910h · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish I had the money to patent these ideas. Instead I will disclose them so the whole world can use them if no one already filed a patent.

    This is the cure for diabetes(sp?) as its an insulin replacement. It can keep the bloodstream below a certain glucose level with the greatest of ease, just burning off power doing something dumb (or useful, it doesn't matter). Just implant a device or series of devices that detect gluecose levels, and the device(s) stays idle or working in a low power mode until levels reach a certain level, then they burn off that excess gluecose until the blood is reduced to an optimal level. This is probably controlled by a slightly more complicated algorithm, but this should get the idea out.

    It also is a GREAT and I do mean GREAT wieght loss aid. It can use up excess energy that the body takes in sending the body into ketosis, thereby getting the Atkins type diet, while eating whatever you want. There is also studies that show if you eat at "starvation" levels your whole life (when ketosis should be happening rather constantly) you increase your lifespan by 20% or more. Therefore, this is also an anti-aging device while being a near perfect diet.

    The diet application does not require going into ketosis. It could just use much of the gluecose, thereby making it as if the person ate a smaller meal.

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  171. Should use more than glucose by mnmn · · Score: 2, Interesting


    This should be improved to use fats and lactose etc from the blood as well. I dont mind driving a small car powered by myself which is powered by Burger King. You get to eat all you can and you get to lose weight while speeding. I think I'll start a trucking company.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  172. Brain powered fusion by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

    Yep, the idea behind the matrix doesn't work - except they mentioned 'in conjunction with a kind of fusion' when describing the process. Here is a completely bogus explanation of the process that at least makes the physics/biology/thermodynamics work out (or at least be more complex)

    Premise 1) The only thing that really differentiates humanity from animals is the ability to think. We already know that some elements of the brain operate at molecular levels and the whole issue of the observer in quantum experiments creates more questions.

    So here it is - the machines need human beings to supply power through fusion via observation of quantum interactions (implying a requirement for free will). The fusion reaction is small in power output and happens within the body (requiring many bodies, making each body convert mass into power and be a net power generator, requiring plugs all over the body to harvest the heat and implying that the process may be continued outside the matrix to do things like creating personal emp blasts).

    1. Re:Brain powered fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The role of the observer in the quantum realm has been greatly exaggerated by new age flakes and innumerate science fiction writers. There is no mystical connection between human consciousness and quantum mechanics. It is simply the result of the fact that these things are too small for us to observe directly with any of our senses. Thus, all we can do is to make them collide into something, and observe the result of the collision. It shouldn't be surprising that "observing" something in this way changes it. We are like blind men trying to measure a house of cards. Without sight, we have to use our sense of touch... So, at best, we might be able to find out how tall the house of cards WAS, before we knocked it over. That doesn't mean that we knocked over the house of cards solely with our minds, or by sheer force of will, does it now?

      There is slightly more to it than that; it is true that some of these things don't really "exist" in the normal sense until we've collided them against something, but the analogy holds. It's not our mere consciousness, or "free will," or anything like that which is responsible for changing anything. It is our actions.

      So maybe, the people in the Matrix are needed to operate some kind of particle accelerator... Nah.

  173. 100W of power from human blood? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Quick, somebody open up a futures market so I can place my bet on how fast our homeless population declines in the U.S. ... If you thought El Paso and Enron were blood-thirsty before, watch out now!

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  174. Offtopic Soul discussion by Vexar · · Score: 1

    I'm impressed with your logic (not your spelling, though).
    I understand the soul to be our character (as in, but not the same thing as our personality, which changes with mood). I further recognize our spirit to be who we are to God, and the two are very close together. Self is consciousness, heart is desires/passions, and mind is decisionmaking and judgement.
    I would very much appreciate your comments, TroyFoley, because you seem familar with discussions of this sort.
    Philosophy is going to have to come up with a term for that CPU chip it looks like we are all headed for as an implant, running off this glucose thing. MetaMind?

  175. Re:The power cell itself just cured diabetes and m by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    Those are both great ideas, but I would wager that you would have a big problem with heat. The obvious side-effect of burning that much glucose is that you would be dumping a LOT of heat into your bloodstream/body.

    So, you've got a good start there, but we need some heat-pipes or endothermic reaction to keep you trading diabetes or extra calories for continual fever.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  176. homeostasis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your body stupidly wastes glucose in maintaining homeostasis

    Well gorky@hotmail.com it just show how little you know about the IMPORTANCE of homeostasis in biological systems... you silly muppet.

  177. Re:The power cell itself just cured diabetes and m by gte910h · · Score: 1

    Naw. Its not a continual fever, its just a little extra body heat, especially if it isn't abrupt. Just give the guy a little more thiamine and the flush will dissapate the heat. People don't have THAT much energy entering their body via food. Especially you're going for the ketosis thing where you're continually running down the gluecose levels.

    With a reduced sugar diet, this jobby could handle most gluecose spikes.

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  178. Glycogen storage- Free-fatty acid system by spineboy · · Score: 1
    Once you have started to deplete your blood glucosen your liver will start to breakdown glycogen into glucose. (Note if you deplete your glucose stores too quickly, you will go into a diabetic like coma nad probably start to seize if your blood glucose is too low.)

    Once your body has depleted enough of its glycogen storage and glucose levelesn more free faty acids (FFA) start to escape from your bodies fat stores, and are oxidized in the mitochondria to acetyl CoA, which can then be introduced into the citric acid cycle for energy production (ATP and it should shift the equilibrium to glucogenesis).

    Note also that highly trained endurance athletes (not most slashdot readers - sorry) can only derive a maximal 70% of energy produced from fat burningn the reaiming 30% or so still must be from glucose. If glucose is depleted much more than this, then exhaustion occurs.

    If I remember correctly from physiology, 100 food calories (100,000 actual calories english units) will produce about 200 watts for an hour. A pound of fat is about 3000 calories, so a pound of fat should roughly produce enough wattage to run a 400 watt computer system for about 15 hours!!!

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  179. Re:The power cell itself just cured diabetes and m by gte910h · · Score: 1

    Especially if this is mounted in the forearm. That would be an easy place to keep cool. (Think, short sleeves year-round).

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  180. Yah that was the original plot actually genius :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just that they didn't feel the general public would understand distributed neural network computing so they came up with "batteries" instead. Remember, you can't sell a movie to just slashdot if you want to make any money.

  181. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Yes! And you can make people's names float over their heads, just like in an FPS! And then you can blow them away, and they'll respawn at the nearest cloning centre! It's genious, I tell you!

    Why climb Mount Everest? Because It's There, and Because We Can!

  182. Think of the implications for the diet industry! by bjparker · · Score: 1

    Now you can eat all you want and lose weight while lowering your energy bill.

  183. (OT) Aren't most German *n?x users KDE users? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Do you mean to imply that there are really that many GNOME users in Germany, now that KDE is within epsilon of being as easy to learn and use as Microsoft Windows XP?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(OT) Aren't most German *n?x users KDE users? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Do you mean to imply that there are really that many GNOME users in Germany

      I wasn't implying anything about Gnome, I was making a bad joke about "click" vs. "klick," as German (as opposed to English, at least) likes the use of the letter "k" instead of "c."

      Also, I'm not German, so I can't comment on the prevalence of KDE usage there. IOW, "I dunno."

    2. Re:(OT) Aren't most German *n?x users KDE users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just play a lot of Mortal Kombat.

  184. Old News - UT Austin deveoped one last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UT Austin researchers developed a fuel cell powered by the glucose in human blood back in 2002. Here's a link to the story on robots.net

  185. Re:The power cell itself just cured diabetes and m by m0smithslash · · Score: 1

    I can just see the next generation of GameBoy ... Introducing the Nintendo "GlucoseBoy". Never worry about changing batteries again. There is a "leech" attachment included in the controls that painlessly extracts the needed glucose from the person playing the game. There is even an indicator showing if you have enough glucose or if you need to eat some more. Of course, it could be the beginnings of the Matrix: automated machines living off the heat/energy produced by there human power sources.

    --
    Your friend and well-wisher
    m0smithslash
    http://www.ferociousflirting.com
  186. Other Way by kweg · · Score: 1

    What if we were to reverse it so that we used electricity to give us more engergy?

    I'm tired, better plug in.

  187. Desert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why yes, I will have desert. After all, I'm eating for 2Ghz now.

  188. Weight loss by jeffbentley · · Score: 1

    All you need is hook up you body to the power grid and you could lose weight and make money selling electricity back to the power co.

  189. Perfect for diabetics... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine a more useful device for helping
    manage diabetes. Anything that can take glucose
    out of the blood would be of immense help - but
    something that could then be used to power
    pacemakers and other electronic gear often
    needed to help with the debilitating cardiac
    effects of diabetes is an invaluable step
    forward.

  190. Re:The power cell itself just cured diabetes and m by gte910h · · Score: 1

    beginnings of the Matrix: automated machines living off the heat/energy produced by there human power sources

    Cool. Well at least for fat people.

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  191. SHUT UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  192. Re:Yah that was the original plot actually genius by jafuser · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping in the last movie the battery story will be exposed as a ruse for the "real" reason (whatever it may be).

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  193. Powering magical devices with blood? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Stephen R. Donaldson called; he wants his plotline from The Wounded Land back.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  194. Commercial Application by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

    Two words: "weight loss".
    People already pay out the ass for weight loss solutions, how about this: These fuel cells are implanted in the body, burning off glucose in the blood, and using the energy for something (powering a cell phone, whatever, it doesn't matter what). That way, fat people around the world^H^H^H^H^H USA could lose weight, while continuing to be lazy. :)

    <TV Anouncer>"Just ate a candy bar that you shouldn't have? ... just charge your cell phone to get rid of those nasty calories"</TV Anouncer>

    --
    There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  195. weight loss? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    If this generates power from sugar in our body then couldn't it be used for weightloss? Instead of all that excess glucose being turned into fat it could be turned into electricity.

    I know the weightloss industry is HUGE, so if these guys can burn off excess sugar (and perhaps fat) with a machine then they'll be the world's first trillionaires.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  196. question: vaporware? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    why does this sound like one of the billions of incredibly revolutionary "free energy" ideas that never go anywhere or never live up to their potential? Ideas like solar panels that were suppose to provide free energy to everyone, but how many of us have even one solar cell on your house or car? How many cars run using fuel cells or hydrogen?

    I don't want to sound like a pessimist, but I'm afraid this is the last time we'll hear about using our blood for energy, at least for a very long time (20+ years).

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  197. Re:Rusty Glucose - Good Question... by smallfries · · Score: 1

    So then it wouldn't be an RFID tag. We call that a radio beacon you dumbass. As an RFID is a passive beacon...

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  198. they already have powered legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I saw it on TV, they have atomic powered artificial legs. With them, you can run 60 miles per hour.

    It was on TV, it must be true.

  199. Cant see the wood for the trees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In between the spelling mistakes there is a message, keep trying you will work it out eventually.

  200. Re:Human Arrogance (wasRe:The Matrix is just a mov by Placido · · Score: 1

    LOL! :-)

    Sometimes I think it's /dev/null

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  201. Forgein Market by DuckyFlab · · Score: 1

    This could be the future of buissness, smuggling homless forgeiners to amreica to power our computers and electronics. This buissness could go real far, i mean you would have to have Customer Service, and you would have to provide food for them. I can see it now, each of us having several of our own cute little chubby forgein kids and their parents to power our everyday items. Don't worry that can't speak english any way. Alright, so it is abit crule, but what's wrong with proposing ideas?

  202. Energy from Trash by thinkerdreamer · · Score: 1

    Just for your information, I have nothing against the Japanese. The Japanese are so highly intelligent they have made a little island a leading economic power. Even with their stock market plunging at a 45 degree angle since the 90's they still have a strong technology background. I just think they should have studied physiology more before creating such a device. They could always create a way to turn plants into glucose then into energy, thus creating money from farmers overgrowth. That would be reasonable. I could create power from my trash.

    1. Re:Energy from Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's already been done one better:
      http://www.discover.com/may_03/featoil.ht ml
      and
      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?si d=03/04/0 1/184227&mode=thread&tid=134

  203. Oh, this is good. by penguinavatar · · Score: 1

    Imagine it! A glucose meter that never needs its batteries changed. You prick yourself, and the glucose level is checked and the power recharged for the next use. Or a vampiric robot. :o