If you believe something you haven't proven yourself, you are exercising faith. If you think otherwise, you are exercising ego. It really isn't that complicated.
That's still transport level security, which protects the message between you and Google. Once the message reaches Google it is in the clear. The GP is talking about message level security, which protects the message until it is decrypted by the intended recipient.
Seems pretty stupid to me that you were modded -1, Troll for making an argument. You don't even have a history of trolling. Sigh. Moderation around here has really gone to shit.
I'm sure that humans would have discovered accidentally that sweet liquids contaminated with yeast produced alcoholic liquids far sooner than we had an understanding of what "alcohol" actually was. Well before we had language, much less than organized religion.
You really think so? I'd speculate that religion was one of humankind's first inventions, right up there with fire and pointy sticks. Interestingly enough, we use all three for pretty much the same purpose these days, but I'm getting off-topic.
Slashdot Mirror
I've often thought of becoming a golf club...
If you have to explain it... (see your own sig for a good example of what I'm getting at).
:)
Free advice from one unfunny person to another.
Is she related to Sigorney Weaver? That may have unexpected consequences, in the long run. What was the name of the company treating the girl again?
The Company.
Bridge building isnt really all that complex
(I know I am oversimplifying to some degree, but you see my point)
Have you ever stopped to wonder if you are actually over-complicating software design rather than over-simplifying the analogy?
Rick Santorum called. He wants his platform back.
Such faith in yourself.
When did you last see your God?
Considering I'm an atheist, never. Thanks for proving my point.
no "faith" is required
If you believe something you haven't proven yourself, you are exercising faith. If you think otherwise, you are exercising ego. It really isn't that complicated.
I understand what you said in the first line. What post were you responding to after that?
The real question is, how long is it before the average consumer becomes apathetic about buying and eatting cloned meat.
I believe that would be a cloned-chicken-or-the-egg argument. Sorry, couldn't resist.
That's very nice of the FDA to decide that the American public doesn't need to be told they are eating cloned meat. I feel free, don't you?
Practicing your base 2, I see.
Does it matter?
That's still transport level security, which protects the message between you and Google. Once the message reaches Google it is in the clear. The GP is talking about message level security, which protects the message until it is decrypted by the intended recipient.
Here's one idea: http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234157&cid=19059547
And if america did this
1984 is set in England.
What, you think the Iraq war is about justice ? No, it's about revenge.
Revenge for what?
the growth of ice crystals that ruin its texture
Or, you could just eat Gelato, and avoid this problem altogether.
No man is an island, Jack.
Seems pretty stupid to me that you were modded -1, Troll for making an argument. You don't even have a history of trolling. Sigh. Moderation around here has really gone to shit.
I'm sure that humans would have discovered accidentally that sweet liquids contaminated with yeast produced alcoholic liquids far sooner than we had an understanding of what "alcohol" actually was. Well before we had language, much less than organized religion.
You really think so? I'd speculate that religion was one of humankind's first inventions, right up there with fire and pointy sticks. Interestingly enough, we use all three for pretty much the same purpose these days, but I'm getting off-topic.
his r'mainin good teeth
He's British.
rights are a privledge in my book not a right
I don't think anything more needs to be said.
It's amazing how many people have an "us vs. them" mentality when it comes to crime. You must be a saint.
:)
If they learn to be so careful that they commit no further crime, I'm OK with that;
You missed my point, but that's okay. I don't think you were looking for it anyway.
Because I stayed out of law school
Thank you.
So once a criminal, always a criminal, eh?
We need the death penalty like we need more stupid people.