I can follow you, right? So, I can sit outside your house, wait for you to come out, follow you to the store, your office, etc, and wait outside until you come out and then follow you some more. I didn't impinge on your privacy because I didn't follow you _in_ or watch what you were doing or listen to your conversations.
So it is here. I can purchase a list of your telephone calls - in other words, follow the path your phone took. But, I'm not purchasing recordings or transcripts of the calls themselves.
Good question. It's certainly one of the major reasons that palm-based devices couldn't get their foot in the door in the pda-phone-camera market. That and, I suppose, that the picture quality wasn't there, back then.
I'm assuming that the full-page advertisement saying "yeah, we got hacked, and you're all screwed" - as required by the new CIPA - will be coming to a newspaper near you very soon?
If there were no further rounds in mutually assured destruction, then the initial stockpile of weapons would have been enough. Instead, both sides increased production and acquisition in phases to (roughly) match each other. Likewise with increased placement of devices in new strategic locations.
With the advent of 'professional' gaming clans, I think it was only a matter of time before people started to glam-up the humble gaming cafe.
Now, to business. Who's to bet that for a further couple of bucks per session people would pay for a workout? Anyone out there interested in funding me to install one of those stick-the-pads-to-your-gut-it-really-exercises-you -well electric shock contraptions to each chair?
There's no prerequisite for one to reside, or operate one's business from the United States in order to have a.us address, and the converse is also true; take a look at any of the online registrars, who will gleefully tell you, "We're sorry that foo.com appears to be taken. We've taken the liberty of researching foo.ca, foo.cc, and foo.ru for you, all of which appear to be available".
If the only requisite (aside obviously from some heavy content restrictions) for getting foo.kids.us is that you only link to other kids.us sites, I don't think this will prevent non US-based organizations from registering these names.
Let's not forget the tens of thousands of nodes running on private IP addresses, and proxying or NATing to get out to the big I.
I'd imagine that, if these nodes were figured into the numbers, we'd find that there are more hosts than addresses under the current IPv4 system.
One way of reducing the number of unused addresses in a range is by assigning ranges to ISPs rather than to individuals. Then, at least, a few more nodes can be milked out of IPv4 before it runs completely dry!
"But there is no way to remove or restrain my desire to exercise the rights guaranteed to a U.S. citizen under the U.S. Constitution "
Forgive me for apparently missing the obvious, but what on earth does the U.S. Constitution have to do with how you use a CD?
Unless it's being used to unlawfully force you to speak, or, conversely, used to unlawfully suppress your speech, et cetera, I fail to see how this part of your comment is in any way meaningful.
Slashdot Mirror
wow, what a dry article.
However, scroll to the bottom. More latin translations than you can shake a stick at, including my personal favorite:
I have a terrible hangover.
Crapulam terriblem habeo.
-S
we-eel, not exactly.
I can follow you, right? So, I can sit outside your house, wait for you to come out, follow you to the store, your office, etc, and wait outside until you come out and then follow you some more. I didn't impinge on your privacy because I didn't follow you _in_ or watch what you were doing or listen to your conversations.
So it is here. I can purchase a list of your telephone calls - in other words, follow the path your phone took. But, I'm not purchasing recordings or transcripts of the calls themselves.
I don't think the 4th amendment applies here.
-S
Am I missing something?
This feature has been available since the early 90s in the UK to anyone with a http://www.radioandtelly.co.uk/rds.htmlRDS (Radio Data System) enabled set.
/me wonders how many times the GM ceo versus Bill Gates story is going to be posted now. Hell, I bet it even gets modded up.
Good question. It's certainly one of the major reasons that palm-based devices couldn't get their foot in the door in the pda-phone-camera market. That and, I suppose, that the picture quality wasn't there, back then.
I'm assuming that the full-page advertisement saying "yeah, we got hacked, and you're all screwed" - as required by the new CIPA - will be coming to a newspaper near you very soon?
well, this isn't necessarily true.
If there were no further rounds in mutually assured destruction, then the initial stockpile of weapons would have been enough. Instead, both sides increased production and acquisition in phases to (roughly) match each other. Likewise with increased placement of devices in new strategic locations.
Australia is not a continent, Australasia is.
With the advent of 'professional' gaming clans, I think it was only a matter of time before people started to glam-up the humble gaming cafe.
u -well electric shock contraptions to each chair?
Now, to business. Who's to bet that for a further couple of bucks per session people would pay for a workout? Anyone out there interested in funding me to install one of those stick-the-pads-to-your-gut-it-really-exercises-yo
Actually, this probably won't be the case.
.us address, and the converse is also true; take a look at any of the online registrars, who will gleefully tell you, "We're sorry that foo.com appears to be taken. We've taken the liberty of researching foo.ca, foo.cc, and foo.ru for you, all of which appear to be available".
There's no prerequisite for one to reside, or operate one's business from the United States in order to have a
If the only requisite (aside obviously from some heavy content restrictions) for getting foo.kids.us is that you only link to other kids.us sites, I don't think this will prevent non US-based organizations from registering these names.
-S
by the time you include infrastructure as well? I maintain my original position that it's pretty close.
Let's not forget the tens of thousands of nodes running on private IP addresses, and proxying or NATing to get out to the big I.
I'd imagine that, if these nodes were figured into the numbers, we'd find that there are more hosts than addresses under the current IPv4 system.
One way of reducing the number of unused addresses in a range is by assigning ranges to ISPs rather than to individuals. Then, at least, a few more nodes can be milked out of IPv4 before it runs completely dry!
"But there is no way to remove or restrain my desire to exercise the rights guaranteed to a U.S. citizen under the U.S. Constitution "
Forgive me for apparently missing the obvious, but what on earth does the U.S. Constitution have to do with how you use a CD?
Unless it's being used to unlawfully force you to speak, or, conversely, used to unlawfully suppress your speech, et cetera, I fail to see how this part of your comment is in any way meaningful.