Slashdot Mirror


Where are the non-SDMI MP3 Players?

alen asks: "I'm in the market for an MP3 player. I've been looking at various models and they all seem to be SDMI ready or compliant. Looking at customer reviews on Amazon confirms this as you'll find at least one person saying you can't transfer the music from the MP3 player to your PC. At least on the newer players you do." I've been resisting the urge to get an MP3 player for precisely this reason, opting to use my laptop and a cassette adaptor for those long driving trips, but this is hardly affordable or efficient. Handhelds might work, but memory is a problem here. Are there any players out there that haven't forgotten the "fair" part in "fair-use"?

"So far I have narrowed my search to 3 choices. I want it to sound very good and be able to play music encoded at 128kb or higher.

The Rio Volt 250 is a CD based player so the SDMI thing doesn't really apply. The Creative Labs Nomad II" proudly displays this as a feature. The Samsung Yepp doesn't use SDMI, but something called SecuMax as stated in the Nomad II technical specs on Amazon. And this little tid bit on the Samsung Yepp homepage confirms that SecuMax is just like SDMI.

Now I'm not looking to download any illegal music from the Internet. I simply want to listen to my CD collection on the train to work or while working out. And there is freely downloadable music out there. If I were to download a song at work or a friend's house, put it in my MP3 player I then wouldn't be able to transfer it back to my PC at home to add to my collection. Where is 'fair use' when the artist is giving away their music for free? And I don't have the link, but what of the recent surges in so called 'secure' CD's that one can't rip into MP3's? Where is the 'fair use' there? Or are we supposed to purchase multiple copies of the same music in different formats?"

550 comments

  1. iPod? by jspectre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anther point for the iPod.. No nasty copy-protection. :-)

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    1. Re:iPod? by pi+radians · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not true. There is a sticker on it that specifically states "Don't steal music".

      Now you know.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    2. Re:iPod? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Darn, there go all my plans to walk into the RIAA hq and take their confiscated mp3s...

    3. Re:iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when I copy my CDs to my iPod it's called stealing now?

    4. Re:iPod? by mblase · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except you can't sync the iPod's playlists to more than one Mac. (However, you can copy it manually, which is more than these other players seem to be doing.)

    5. Re:iPod? by toupsie · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Its no problem if they are your CDs. Steve Jobs actually has the right idea regarding "stealing music". He has said it is not a technology problem but a social one. People who are inclined to steal will no matter what technology you use to prevent it. "Don't Steal Music" sticker on a new iPod is a social message.

      P.S. I own an iPod and its worth every penny of its $399 sticker price. It blows my Archos Jukebox 6000 out of the water.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    6. Re:iPod? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      ?

      I thought that once a song gets onto the iPod you can't get a copy back off it in digital form.

    7. Re:iPod? by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      The iPod basically works as an external firewire drive with an MP3 player built into it, so the files are there if you access the iPod like a drive.

    8. Re:iPod? by snyperm · · Score: 1

      The mp3s fiels are stored in a hidden directory you can access when the iPod is mounted as a hard drive. Granted they're not too keen on peopel using this to steal music. As of yet there's piracy protection built in aside from the "Don't steal music" honor system they have going.

    9. Re:iPod? by toupsie · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have had my iPod for a little over a week now and its very trivial to copy files from the mp3 storage area to your mac. In Mac OS X, just hop to the "Terminal" and do a "cp -R /Volumes/[iPod Name]/Music/* ~/Music" and it moves across nicely.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    10. Re:iPod? by mmelder · · Score: 1

      Wrong! You can easily unhide the hidden folder that contains your mp3s and copy them from the hard drive via firewire. That's some fancy copy protection! A hidden folder!

      --

      Phluid!

    11. Re:iPod? by frankie · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      "Don't steal music"

      Here's a treat for paranoiacs: the Invisible bit on the iPod's music folder probably counts as a protection mechanism under the DMCA.

      I love Macs, but Apple's lawyers are absolutely rabid. It could happen. :-)

    12. Re:iPod? by aozilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess the "finder flags" menu is an illegal circumvention device. :)

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    13. Re:iPod? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but it's entirely probable that your description of how to circumvent this "protection" is in direct violation of the DMCA's anti-circumvention clause...
      Just an FYI...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    14. Re:iPod? by toupsie · · Score: 4, Informative
      It takes my Archos Jukebox 6000 about 5 1/2 hours to copy over 6 gigs of data and it take my iPod only 12 minutes to copy 5 gigs over. The iPod can set individual EQ settings for each of your mp3. I can play breakout on my iPod. The iPod supports ID3v2.3 tags while the Archos supports on the 1.1 tags. The Archos only displays the song title while the iPod will display the song, artist and album.

      Gay? Like in happy or your alternative lifestyle?

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    15. Re:iPod? by sllort · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Mac OS X, just hop to the "Terminal" and do a "cp -R /Volumes/[iPod Name]/Music/* ~/Music" and it moves across nicely.

      You fool! Your comment is a circumvention device! I hope you posted it from an anonymous relay, because the RIAA Thought Police are already mobilized. Your comment is a "digital crowbar", it will be used by millions to deprive starving recording artists of their royalty proceeds! Jack Valenti is currently mobilizing an army, if I were anywhere near the Slashdot server room I'd leave the area immediately. Laser-guided "smart bombs" aren't always perfect for accuracy.

    16. Re:iPod? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh sh*t! The last thing I need is the Sensible Shoe Wearing, Amazon Warriorette of the RIAA chasing me down for my DMCA violation! I am now going into hiding in a country where freedom of speech still matters.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    17. Re:iPod? by bbum · · Score: 1

      OS X: Or go and download Podestal from VersionTracker.com.

      Podestal detects the presence of an iPod and displays the music on the device organized by Artist and Album. One can easily select tracks and drag-n-drop 'em to wherever to copy. It parses the ID3 tags, so the presentation is quite a bit cleaner than just displaying everything by filename. It also includes a file browser.

      I would post the URL, but versiontracker's search facility is broken right now.

      (I wrote the silly thing so I won't comment on quality. :-)

    18. Re:iPod? by MrEfficient · · Score: 3, Funny
      Aha, but have you noticed the almost subliminal message on the commercial? Near the end of the commercial, at the bottom of the screen are the words, "Don't steal music". After viewing this commercial several times, I found that I was unable to download music off the internet. Apple is clearly making use of copy protection schemes, they just use different methods. What do you think, "Think Different" means?

      --
      Check out AbiWord.
    19. Re:iPod? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      OK -- the jokes about "effective circumvention devices" have been beaten to death on slashdot. So, I bothered to look up what the DMCA actually says --

      a technological measure `effectively controls access to a work' if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

      Clear as mud. My guess is that if the 'ordinary operation' of the iPod mounts the filesystem for use with standard file access tools, then it fails even this broad definition.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    20. Re:iPod? by pinkelefant · · Score: 0

      no it aint...
      theres no FM radio in it..

      In addition to all that iPod offers , what I need is a FM tuner and the ability to record voice and also radio .

      now that would be an awesome device worth $399.

      p

      --
      Feel free to concat me with all your troubles...
    21. Re:iPod? by Selur_Natas · · Score: 1

      I Prefer Owning Discs.

      --
      . Mankind evolved from apes, JonKatz is still a baboon.
    22. Re:iPod? by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      OK, but can you use an iPod with a PC?
      Linux?

    23. Re:iPod? by d.valued · · Score: 1

      Hey, I agree. Don't own it yet, but it has the dead sexy appeal courtesy of Apple's amazing design department. (I'd get an iBook and convert it to Linux if I could afford it. Oh well. Guess I'll have to stick to the Vaio for now.)

      Something to keep in mind is that no small number of players are limited only by the software included. I have a RaveMP by Sensory Science and it'll transfer the music to my Linux box courtesy OS software.

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    24. Re:iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only getting 300KB/s on USB? &lt25% utilization? Hmmmm..... And how often do you wipe out all 1200 songs and start over from scratch? Oh, I get it, it's a purely hypothetical example with no basis in reality to help you justify the $400 vs. $170 after rebate for the Archos.

      Could Apple have intentionally crippled the USB transfer to competing devices? Inquiring minds want to know!

    25. Re:iPod? by gig · · Score: 2

      I don't think the hidden folder is even there for "copy protection", at least not primarily. It separates iPod's day-to-day file storage from the rest of the drive, so that when you plug in an iPod as a hard drive, the hard drive appears to be empty in Finder, ready for you to use, even if it has 3GB of MP3's stored on it by iTunes. This kind of thing really, really helps non-technical users, and is pretty classic Apple. Obviously, the technical user has no problem working around this if they want to, just set the folder to not be invisible.

    26. Re:iPod? by zonker · · Score: 0

      better find a cave to hind in... of course, if the riaa get's there way, you'll be smoked out by the us government, you evildoer.

    27. Re:iPod? by bbum · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      You may not wipe your Archos clean on a regular basis because it is a *pain in the ass* to reload.

      I replace *all* songs on my iPod on a regular basis because it takes such a short amount of time to refresh. And it charges while it is doing so.

      I can get up in the morning, select a playlist that fits my mood, connect the iPod to the mac and it will be fully sync'd AND have enough of a charge to get me from home to work in the time it takes me to shower and eat breakfast.

      It is easy to confuse limitations with usage patterns...

    28. Re:iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a gay person, I think this comment is more offensive then the original comment, which made a little bit of sense as a joke. The first anon poster didn't reference it as an insult, the way I see it. Jokings aside, I think Mac people are simply being Mac people as they always will be: too rich, too proud, too naive and too dumb to argue with.

      As a heterosexual, poor, humble, smart, and unprejudiced Mac user, I find your post hypocritical and just downright retarded.

  2. Ipod! by Noodlenose · · Score: 1, Informative

    Go for the Ipod! Dirk

    1. Re:Ipod! by sporty · · Score: 2

      They are porting over key software for communicating with the iPod over to the windows. So stop comlaining.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Ipod! by Surak · · Score: 2

      Yes, but then you have to buy a Mac. Clearly the readers of slashdot are past the hand-holding and don't need to pay a premium for colored plastic.

      It's firewire and uses a 5GB hard disk. Write a Linux driver for it. :) And actually, come to think of it, on a Mac it acts as a firewire hard drive, so I'm assuming that if you had a standard firewire hard disk driver coupled with the the Mac hfs file system driver that's already in Linux, you're probably already 90% of the way there.

      Rather than complain "you have to buy a Mac" WRITE DRIVERS! This is the advantage of having an open source operating system to hack, folks.

  3. Memory on handhelds by bnatale · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Memory is not a problem with handhelds. Get one that uses compact flash cards and you even can use a 1GB IBM Microdrive. I use an iPAQ with a microdrive as mp3 player and it works great. The only problem is the size and the battery.

    1. Re:Memory on handhelds by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, battery life does suck on a Microdrive. It's a little more expensive per MB, but a 512MB Compactflash costs about the same as a 1GB Microdrive. Better battery life and no moving parts. 256MB are a little cheaper, about $.50/MB.

    2. Re:Memory on handhelds by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but 1GB is woefully inadequate for my needs... I've been spoiled by my 20GB Neo, which allows me to carry around my entire CD collection at once. Downgrading to anything less would be awful :-) On that note, though, if someone made a 20GB (or more) add-on HD for a PocketPC-style device, I'd be all over it... anyone know if anyone makes such a thing? Seems like it would be possible to add a "docking sleeve" sort of thing for a notebook-style 2.5" drive that would maybe double to thickness of an ipaq/palm-sized device. (Yeah, battery life would suck, but that's a nonissue for me, as I rarely listen to MP3s under battery power. It's the "easily-carried" factor, not the "listen on the go" factor, that makes it for me.)

  4. archos jukebox by theridersofrohan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try the archos jukebox (http://www.archos.com )

    A hard drive based solution, comes at 6GB-20GB flavors, works under Linux (I'm using it with the usb-storage module), and I got it for around £150 (british pounds).

    Great for transfering data as well: Windows finds it as a normal drive, and I can mount it under linux (vfat).

    Cheers,
    Stefanos

    1. Re:archos jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the Archos on road trips, it works great. It also uses standard AA rechargable batteries. You can void the warranty and open it and replace the stock NiCads with something better, or replace the stock batteries if you wear them out.
      Its kind of ugly, but small and works well.

    2. Re:archos jukebox by alek202 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Altough the software still has a few minor bugs, it is a very good box (don't forget you get a *real* usb hard drive for your money also). I have the Archos Jukebox Recorder which I primarly use for professional audio recording (yes, that's right, we use it to create live cuts of our DJ sets at various clubs). At the studio, I just plug the recorder into the workstation, and upload the realtime-encoded MP3s to the web. Unfortunately, the Jukebox Recorder only does VBR encoding, but with around 170kbps it is sufficent.

      Cheers,
      Timo

      --
      Every problem has a solution, but every solution creates new problems.
    3. Re:archos jukebox by Quaryon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I second this - I'm listening to my jukebox 6000 as I write. I've ripped out the original 6Gb hard disk (you can now get a 20Gb version too, called the "studio 20") and inserted a 30Gb one - since it takes standard 9.5mm height 2.5" drives this is quite a simple operation, and it uses a normal FAT filesystem so you can use all the normal tools on it (defrag, scandisk, whatever..) The PC sees it as an extra drive using the standard USB hard disk mechanism so it works under Windows or Linux, and I believe Mac as well (I don't have a Mac so I can't test it..)

      It has a few idiosyncrasies so it's well worth reading the list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/archosjukebox6000 (requires registration) to pick up all the necessary hints and tips - the support there is probably better than you will get from Archos themselves.

      The JB6K has the advantage that you can copy whatever files you want onto it - if they're MP3 format it will play them, if not it will ignore them so you can use it just as an external portable hard disk. It'll cope with MP3's encoded up to 320kbit/s CBR or VBR. It also has upgradable firmware so theoretically it could be made to support other sound formats although there doesn't seem to be any sign that Archos are moving towards this.

      Q.

    4. Re:archos jukebox by elinenbe · · Score: 1

      Check out a review at: www.umich.edu/~elinenbe/archos . This is the best player by far, and I have tried them ALL! (new Classic, PJB, Creative Nomad Jukebox, RioVolt, RioVolt 250, etc.) -eric

      --
      -eric
    5. Re:archos jukebox by bfree · · Score: 2

      Mine just died on me :-( The hard disk has failed with one of those nice click-click-click sounds. A word of warning, when I went to try and get some support about this I was told to write in French (I'm in Ireland) so I wrote to the US instead and got no reply.

      The machine was good while it lasted with easy use under Linux (2.4.9+ but 2.4.11 for easy use cause they forgot to mention the config before then) and Windows. The only problem was 6Gb just wasn't enough by a long way. I now have the chance to return the unit for a full refund and I think I will to get something bigger.

      Great idea, pity it only lasts two months (yep I know I was probably unlucky but so be it)

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    6. Re:archos jukebox by Teethgrinder · · Score: 2

      I can heavily recommend the Jukebox as well. I got one in February and so far haven't had any problems with it.

      It's slightly smaller and weighing less than the Nomad, with the batteries making up for a good deal of the weight.

      Batteries are also another important plus about the Jukebox with only the minor annoyance of the stupid lids. But it uses regular NiMH AA batteries so you can buy the comparably cheap batteries yourself instead of buying some expensive battery pack.

      The 4 batteries usually last for at least 4 hours, though I found it seems to heavily depend on the battery quality (and on the mA, of course).

      The only nitpick I have is that their website is shoddy scripted crap.

    7. Re:archos jukebox by cymru1 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for one of these, where did you get it for £150???

    8. Re:archos jukebox by toupsie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I own an Archos Jukebox 6000 but just switched to an iPod. Its a good mp3 player however copying files via USB is like pulling teeth. It takes about 5 to 6 hours to fill up its 6 gig HD. My iPod only takes 12 minutes to fill up its 5 gig HD via firewire. Granted, the Archos is compatible with Linux and Windows which probably makes it more useful for most folks on Slashdot.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    9. Re:archos jukebox by shivan · · Score: 1


      you can find the archos jukebox here

    10. Re:archos jukebox by curunir · · Score: 1

      I don't own an iPod, but from what I've been told by people who work at Apple, you can use the iPod with any computer/OS that is firewire compatible.

      The iTunes software is Mac only (thank god! ;), but I've been told if you use it in "external HD" mode, there is a hidden folder that holds all of the songs for the iPod to play. Just copy your mp3s to/from that folder. I think Apple was only interested in the illusion of SDMI compliance.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    11. Re:archos jukebox by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, the Jukebox Recorder only does VBR encoding, but with around 170kbps it is sufficent.
      What's wrong with VBR? At a given (average) bitrate with a decent encoder, VBR will almost always produce a superior encoding as the parts that don't need as much detail can be encoded at a lower rate than the more demanding parts. I typically encode with LAME at 160 kbps VBR; for what I've thrown at it, I usually can't tell the MP3 from the source material. (I don't exactly claim to have "golden ears," though. :-) )

      Getting somewhat back on-topic...as the original poster mentioned, probably the best way to avoid SDMI would be to get one of the MP3 CD players. I have an Apex AD600A and a Rio Volt SP90; neither of them are affected by any fair-use-denial technologies. (The Apex also plays DVDs from anywhere in the world, so it flips the bird at the MPAA as well as the RIAA.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:archos jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Five to Six hours!??!! Using my Archos 6000 and Win2k, I filled the 6 gigs in approx 30 mins!!!

    13. Re:archos jukebox by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Just a little problem with archos:
      he implement SCMS. see http://www.archos.com/uk/support/tech_jbrec_rh.htm l

    14. Re:Archos Jukebox by Chatterton · · Score: 1
    15. Re:archos jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. The Archos 6000 uses USB 1.x which has a maximum transfer rate of 12Mb/s. This means it will take (8 x 6 x 10^9)/(12 x 10^6 x 60) minutes to transfer 6GB. Thus the theoretical lower limit is close to 67 minutes.

    16. Re:archos jukebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own one but I think this is possible by taking the hard drive out, put on the 2.5 inch drive adapter, plug it into the IDE controller on your desktop (a lot of us have already lost it's casing shell...) and transfer with your IDE controller.

      hell if you have a good drill/driver, ATA100 controllers, high speed hard drives, you might beat the firewire speed!

    17. Re:Archos Jukebox by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Hm. Thanks for the info. It appears, however, that this is only for the recorder...

  5. I like the CD option personally by night_flyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    might be a little more bulky, but you dont have to worry about a memeory chip going bad, and you can pack around 150 songs at a higher bitrate on a cd and know what you have in the player.

    as for copying "back" to your collection, if its such a big deal to steal the music, borrow the CD and rip it yourself.

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:I like the CD option personally by Splork · · Score: 2

      I second this opinion. I make CD-Rs full of 256kbit/sec MP3s out of my audio cd collection. There are plenty of devices that can play these now including half of the dvd players on shelves out there today.

    2. Re:I like the CD option personally by Paladin128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are some problems with the CD option. I personally want a solid state option, because I do not want the damn thing to skip when I'm working out.

      The CD option is great if you have a burner and just need it for your daily commute. This is not at all an option for highly-active people, however. The solid state ones are smaller, more rugged, and skip-free.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    3. Re:I like the CD option personally by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      never said there wernt problems :)

      for working out/excessive movement, the memory chip models are definitally the way to go, but from my stand point, I can archive my Music collection, and play the same medium on my home system, my computer system at work and in my car once I purchase that piece of equipment.

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    4. Re:I like the CD option personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally want a solid state option, because I do not want the damn thing to skip when I'm working out.

      Wait aren't these other things just hard drives? Wont they respond badly to shocks?

    5. Re:I like the CD option personally by Nastard · · Score: 2

      I have a Kenwood z919 that plays burned mp3 disks. It has a 1meg buffer, and in the 6 months I have owned it, I have never once heard it skip (which is saying something, because I drive like an insane person).

    6. Re:I like the CD option personally by mdowell · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hello

      I bought a RioVolt about 3 months ago and I friggin love it! I archive my mp3s on CD anyway so this is the perfect player for me. My DVD player also reads mp3 cds so I can't go wrong. The player also reads CD-RW discs so if you want a daily selection of songs you got it made. On top of that it is upgradable by d/l a new patch onto a CD-RW, pressing play, viola, upgraded. It currently reads *.mp3 and *.wma files, but I'm sure other formats could be added. The last patch added support for reading WinAmp playlist files (*.m3u) 2 double AA batteries last about 10-12 hours because it loads the current mp3 file up and then stops spinning...very cool! For around $150 bucks it is a great deal.

      I really can't say enough about how cool this bad boy is!!

      Anyway, that is my 2 cents :)

    7. Re:I like the CD option personally by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      you could get a sony MiniDisk recorder/player...never skip and it is as useful as an audio tape only with random access

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:I like the CD option personally by thoughtcrime · · Score: 1

      The iPod is basically a rubber-mounted hard drive attached to a solid-state chip. Normally, the drive is powered down. However, every twenty minutes it spins up to feed the solid-state part the next twenty minutes worth of music. (This is also how it gets its twenty minutes of shock protection, btw.)

      --

      ____ _______
      Duty now for the future!
    9. Re:I like the CD option personally by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      You drive.

      You don't, for example, rollerblade.

      Want to find out why some of us are solid-state only? Try rollerblades. :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    10. Re:I like the CD option personally by rthille · · Score: 1

      You don't jog, do you? :-)

      I recently added a solid-state MP3 player to my music player collection, since trying to jog with a minidisc (Sony, don't remember the model) drove me crazy.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    11. Re:I like the CD option personally by Nastard · · Score: 2

      Well that, my friend, is a horse of a different color.

    12. Re:I like the CD option personally by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      why? is it a pain to hold or somthing?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    13. Re:I like the CD option personally by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend rollerblades to school every day. She listens to a Dlink MP3 CD player. She told me that it rarely skips.

      CD audio is much more prone to skipping than MP3 discs.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    14. Re:I like the CD option personally by Myself · · Score: 2

      I don't see why the mp3-cd players are so stupid. Years ago, I had a portable CD player that would buffer 40 seconds of audio for skip protection. If an mp3-cd player were equipped with the same size buffer, it should be able to hold about 400 seconds of audio without being able to see the disc.

      I'm sure even insane rollerbladers coast for 20 seconds out of every 400, that should be plenty for the device to refill its buffer. Besides, RAM is cheap! An mp3-cd player should be able to spin the disc up when you select a song, buffer the whole song in RAM, spin the disc down, and save power while playing it.

      I guess what I'm asking for is a solid-state player bolted to a CD-reading back end for mass storage.

    15. Re:I like the CD option personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It was jiggly, you stupid bitch!

      -rthille

    16. Re:I like the CD option personally by _typo · · Score: 1
      An mp3-cd player should be able to spin the disc up when you select a song, buffer the whole song in RAM, spin the disc down, and save power while playing it.

      The Rio Volt SP250 has this exact feature.

      --

      Pedro Côrte-Real.

    17. Re:I like the CD option personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a RioVolt myself. It does have RAM and a decent amount. It claims 8 minutes of skip protection, and I have seen it play 2 320 kbps songs in a row without spinning up to load them, it loaded the second one midway through the first one's playing.

    18. Re:I like the CD option personally by Longstaff · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never driven through Manhattan, Jersey City or Hoboken in a Miata. ;-)

      I used to rollerblade for at least 2 hours a day and I was never jostled like I have been on those roads. My Kenwood MP3 car CD player has *never* skipped. Highly recommended for those that can deal with CDR/CDRW media devices

    19. Re:I like the CD option personally by onethumb · · Score: 1

      While CD players may skip, they have massive amounts of time between skips with which to re-track.

      The RioVolt250, for example, has 8 minutes of anti-skip time. (I assume that's at 160kbps or something...less if you're using higher bitrates). But that's a ton of time it has to find where it was and burst another chunk of songs into it's memory.

      Maybe it's just me, but that's plenty.

      --
      my smug mug is on smugmug ... is yours?
    20. Re:I like the CD option personally by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      This is true.

      However, I have rollerbladed in Victoria (B.C.) - a city of great rolling, er, mountains.

      Excitement in traffic. The CD player I had then would generally just stop whenever I started going down hills and exceeded a certain speed. ;)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    21. Re:I like the CD option personally by gig · · Score: 2

      "An mp3-cd player should be able to spin the disc up when you select a song, buffer the whole song in RAM, spin the disc down, and save power while playing it."

      iPod does this, except it's a hard drive that it spins down, and it stores 20 minutes of music in RAM at a time. That's the way it ought to be done. This also gets them their 10-12 hours of continuous battery life on one charge.

    22. Re:I like the CD option personally by rthille · · Score: 1

      No, they skip (if you wear it), or you have to hold them carefully so they don't. Basically, they don't get enough stable time to read to refill the 40 second (my player) buffer.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    23. Re:I like the CD option personally by hearingaid · · Score: 2
      I'm sure even insane rollerbladers coast for 20 seconds out of every 400, that should be plenty for the device to refill its buffer.

      Actually, even insane rollerbladers coast a lot more than that.

      The trouble is when you get on bumpy surfaces, like sidewalks. If you only rollerblade on paved areas, then it's really smooth and actually if your CD player is properly centered in a backpack or something, it'll skip less than it would if you were running at the same speed.

      But on a sidewalk... if you get up any decent speed at all, you're facing bumps. Every time you hit one of those edges, it jostles the player. You bounce, but your player doesn't like it so much.

      That means that if you speed down the sidewalk for, say, 400 seconds, your CD player's buffer is now empty, and is not being refilled.

      In most cities, it's not safe to blade on the roads, and therefore we get this problem.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  6. Archos Jukebox by Carnivore · · Score: 1

    The Archos family of hard drive based MP3 players have nothing to do with SDMI or any copy control whatsoever.
    They're cheap compared to the flashram devices and they are pretty high quality, I have heard

  7. iPod by Green+Light · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the FireWire-equipped PeeCee (or Mac, obviously), you can not only carry your music collection (or at least a large percentage of it) around with you, but can transfer the files to any suitably equipped machine. The music files are in an invisible directory on the iPod, and are easy to find.

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    1. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But you didn't mention that you can transfer 5gigs in about 10 minutes.
      I have been geting about 12-13 hours on a charge.
      It fits in a shirt pocket.
      It has a great UI on it.

      The other MP3 Players out there can give you 1 or 2 of those things, but not all in the same package.

      I have had mine now for a few weeks and I have loved every minute of it. Narry a problem. Glad I waited for it.

    2. Re:iPod by Chembal · · Score: 1

      Have you successfully used the iPod with a PC? If so, what did it involve? What's the procedure to upload/download files off the iPod with a firewire equipped PC? Did it involve any additional software? I was under the impression the iPod was Mac only.

      --

      Life is but a mist upon the horizon.

    3. Re:iPod by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

      You use Mediafour's XPod (here). You need a FireWire (IEEE 1394) port on your computer, but you can buy adapter cards for these relatively cheap.

      XPod isn't ready yet, but you can kludge it by copying files (having the iPod mounted as a FireWire drive) into the "secret" mp3 folder and then using the iPod to play the music. Voila.

      FYI, I have used an iPod extensively, and it is an *awesome* mp3 player. Easily the best I've ever seen.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    4. Re:iPod by Mr.Strange · · Score: 1

      Every time someone mentions XPod as a solution I think "huh?". Perhaps someone can enlighten me.

      When you copy song to the Music folder on the iPod manually through the terminal or other hack programs, the copied file does not automatically add itself to the iPod's database. On the other hand when you add a song to the iPod through iTunes (through manual or automatic synching), the file is coped to the iPod and an entry is made in the iPod's database (located at /Volumes/[iPod]/iPod_Control/iTunesDB). This is the database which the iPod uses for the front end when you it as a standalone music player. It seems that XPod will *not* do this and thus will not enable Windows users to use iPod how it was designed - as a standalone portable music player. The files will be there, but the database on the iPod won't know about them.

      I checked the XPod faq and it looks like XPod will simply allow you to use the iPod as a firewire disk with the added feature of catalogging the songs on your iPod and moving files back and forth. Is this good enough?

    5. Re:iPod by gig · · Score: 2

      If you trash iTunes music database file and then start iTunes, it will rebuild the file by reading all the ID3 tags from the files in the music folder. Maybe the same is true of iPod if its database file is deleted? Perhaps XPod will just copy new files over and then delete iPod's catalogue? Similarly, if you delete the "desktop database" on a Mac, it is rebuilt automatically.

      Also, there are various commands you can give an iPod by pressing and holding some of its buttons. Maybe rebuilding its music database is one of those commands?

      The people who are making the XPod software also make a solution for reading HFS+ disks on Windows, so they are building on their current product line, not just putting out vapor for publicity. I'm sure they'll put a decent product together, by Windows standards.

  8. Philips eXpanium by mirko · · Score: 2

    Burn your MP3 on CDs and play them in a Philips eXpanium...
    10 hours of music in a Discman-like device.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Philips eXpanium by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at getting one of those (eXpanium) - anyone have experience with them?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Philips eXpanium by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, the sound is fabulous, the autonomy and fault-tolerance are more than okay (I have some dusty CDs ;-)...

      My only cons is that I have to hide these from the frozen wind when I am biking (here in Switzerland it had some "hickups" around -5 degrees (Celsius))

      BTW it can also read standard Audio CDs.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Philips eXpanium by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Guess I won't be taking it outside much during the winter here in Montreal :)

      Thanks (Oh and I think it's pretty much a given that any CD based MP3 player plays "legacy" CDs as well)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Philips Expanium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the 8cm one has shitty battery life and you can only fit like 3 hours of music compressed on an 8cm cd. that kind of sucks.

      however the UDF & CDR/CDRW support allows for using rewritable media and makes these not care whatsoever about the included material and transferring it to or from a PC or to a car stereo system.

    5. Re:Philips eXpanium by Picass0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My wife gave me a Philips Expanium recently. I'd say the pros outweigh the cons. The sound is good, I don't get too much skipping, and when I insert a disc, the scan process will look for mp3s on any disc. I have old archive discs where I have zip files and misc. data mixed with my mp3s, and I have no problems listening to these discs.

      My biggest gripe is the display sucks. I would like to have a scrolling text message, but instead the display gives you a number for the directory (album) and file (song).

      It's a bit bulkier than the nifty little solid state devices, but I have 301 They Might Be Giants songs on the disc in my player right now. The mini players with large memory cost more, while the Expanium sells for for only 90 US dollars.

      I picked up a 20 hour rechargable lead battery at Radio Shack (part number 23-505) and replaced the headphones with a Kenwood KPM-510 headset. I usually keep the thing in a bookbag anyway, so the bulk doesn't bother me.

    6. Re:Philips eXpanium by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah but I brought it back after a week and changed it for the diamond riovolt.

      The expanium is cheaper and it sounds ok. However you cannot skip through the tracks, the headphones are crappy and the LCD is hard to read.

      The rio sounds better, can scan tracks, has better headphones and a big lcd. Well worth it IMO.

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    7. Re:Philips eXpanium by CrazyP · · Score: 1

      I bought the eXpanium this summer. Its great cuz it can play rw's too. So no need in wasting cdr's (even though they are cheap theses days). And right now I have about 150 songs on my rw and its only about 400megs full. Its good for playing mp3 cds, but when you try to play a regular audio cd it skips easily (as I found out trying to skate and listen to a regular cd)...I think thats the only bad thing about the eXpanium.

      --
      How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
    8. Re:Philips eXpanium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the really new ones. the 8cm one looks cool although the battery life is shit. 3 hours on one double A, although my Creative Jukebox gets around 4 hours on rechargeable batteries.

      The new ones have cooler displays (including text in the more expensive ones and do id3 shit) and many more features along with decent battery life. I've heard the battery life is over 2x that of the Rio Volt although i've not seen a Rio Volt and thus can't offer a definite opinion. (anyone else?)

      The coolest part is that most (if not all?) do CDR/CDRW and UDF discs. The UDF is cool just for using directCD so that you can drag and drop files on a cd and be done with it. you can then put the CD back into the computer and add more files and without ever writing an iso portion and wasting space on seperate sessions. Cool.

    9. Re:Philips eXpanium by mirko · · Score: 1

      > "you cannot skip through the tracks"

      I beg your pardon ?

      Press the skip button (provided you are not in lock mode...)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  9. Nex II by Yodster · · Score: 1

    its what works
    no sdmi
    very simple and yet uses compact flash for better expandability then smartmedia
    it just rocks

    1. Re:Nex II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yeah, i have one, they kick ass.
      you can use a microdrive in it, or a compactflash type 2 (you can find 160 mb CF typeII cards for cheap)
      and you can use it as an external drive to transport any files. (i think that works in linux too, but i'm not too sure)
      try www.mp3playerstore.com if u wanna buy one, especially if you're from canada or us. they have it for cheap and i think it's free shipping now

    2. Re:Nex II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a NEX II also. Storage is a 340Mb Microdrive. No copy protection...upgradeable firmware ( WMA compatible for Windoze ). Nice sound, comes with a case. Very good unit for shirt pocket listening. Buy an IDE reader / writer and it works like a external Hard - Drive --
      Oh Yeah, NiMH batteries a must.
      Ebay has them for $89...the Microdrives are $110.

  10. CD players by kkirk007 · · Score: 1

    There are several MP3 CD players out there. Just burn a CD full of MP3s (800MB will get you quite a few MP3s)...a 4GB MP3 collection will all fit on 4 CDs, and they're very handy. Plus, you can still trade the CDs full of MP3s with friends and transfer them to other computers with no problem.

    1. Re:CD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a 4GB MP3 collection will all fit on 4 CDs

      800MB = 1GB?

      Even hard drive makers don't lie that much!

    2. Re:CD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      800MB.. sure, that's alot of room. BUT THEY DONT EXIST! Even with the oversized 80Min disc (compared to 74 minute - 650MB) you only get 700MB of data. Unless your CD recorder is totally out of spec, and some manufactuer totally disregarded red book, you're a fool.

    3. Re:CD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      800MB will get you quite a few MP3s

      You mean 80 minutes (or 700MB) right?

    4. Re:CD players by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      Actually with the right burner, you can burn either 90 or 99 minute discs. I've never seen the blank media being sold, but Tom's Hardware reviewed it here so it must exist somewhere.

  11. The original Rio PMP300 ... by irq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The original Rio PMP300 will let you take files out of it, as long as you don't use the software that came with it. If you use the *nix rio tool by the Snowblind Alliance, you can put any file in the rio, and take any file out of the rio, and use it as a generic storage device, albeit not a very good one because SmartMedia is expensive. The limitation on pulling stuff out of it is only in the rio desktop software.

    1. Re:The original Rio PMP300 ... by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      I was going to write that exact same comment - more or less :)

      Lets hear it for the Rio PMP300 - mine's still thumping along.

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    2. Re:The original Rio PMP300 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cept it's parallel not USB:P
      *yorn*

      I've got one of the teal ones. 96Mb is nice but it takes ages to upload to it.

  12. I don't think that word means what you think... by elmegil · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Fair Use" in the context of copyright has a pretty specific meaning. It has to do with use of sections of a copyrighted work for review purposes and for educational purposes (among others, I make no claim to being complete in my description). But it has nothing to do with "that's not fair" as both the poster and the editor seem to believe.

    C'mon people, we won't be taken seriously if we can't even learn the jargon.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by baptiste · · Score: 2
      C'mon people, we won't be taken seriously if we can't even learn the jargon.

      Wait - I believe almost everyone here will tell you they believe fair use to mean 'If I buy a song/movie, I can make copies of that said media for MY personal use only. This is commonly referred to as 'fair-use' and grew out of the rulingas and laws passwed when VCRs first came onto the scene. Now the jargon may be wrong, though EVERYONE seems to use it when referring to this scneario) SO if the term fair-use isn't the right term IYHO for personal copying for personal use, what is?

    2. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by jon787 · · Score: 0

      It does mean that I can make backup copies or copies in an alternative form of something I bought. I still have compter games where step one of the installation procedure is to COPY the installation disks!

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    3. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by steelwraith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      C'mon people, we won't be taken seriously if we can't even learn the jargon.

      Frag the jargon.. they'll take us seriously when we don't buy their SDMI 'enhanced' crap and instead go around/through them.

      There is no encryption that cannot be broken

      There is no hardware that cannot be hacked

      But there is no way to remove or restrain my desire to exercise the rights guaranteed to a U.S. citizen under the U.S. Constitution - and Fair Use does mean the ability for me to make a back-up copy of the material I have lawfully purchased. Too bad for the corps if it is in a format they do not approve of.

    4. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by JASegler · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the "fair" part they are talking about relates to time shifting and media conversion.
      It's fair use to copy an LP to cassette so you can play it in your car.
      It's fair use to copy a CD to cassette so you can play it in your car.
      It's fair use to convert a CD to mp3 so you can play it in your computer/mp3 player.

      The fair use part is that you bought it once. You shouldn't have to buy it for every media type on the planet.

      Even under the "license" model. The person has purchased a license to listen to a piece of music. The media in which it is stored is irrelevant. Of course if the RIAA ever switched to a convoluted EULA like MS's...

      -Jerry

    5. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by pbryan · · Score: 1

      If I am not mistaken, the term "fair use" also equally applies to the purchaser's use of copyrighted content, and was heavily touted during the videocassette legal challenges in the 80s, which was eventually won, a success for consumers, a thorn in the side of the television networks.

      I believe an owner's right to copy purchased content for backup purposes is considered fair use in the legal sense. I believe using your TiVO to record and "time shift" content is considered fair use in the legal sense.

      I believe transferring the CD you purchased into MP3s for personal use is considered fair use in the legal sense, and will not expose the purchaser to legal action for doing so.

      I'm sure a legal type could shed more light on this subject by giving a precice definition.

      --

      My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

    6. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      however the article specifically states copying a "friends" mp3 and taking it home to copy to his own collection...

      If I were to download a song at work or a friend's house, put it in my MP3 player I then wouldn't be able to transfer it back to my PC at home to add to my collection...

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    7. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Read it in context....
      Now I'm not looking to download any illegal music from the Internet. I simply want to listen to my CD collection on the train to work or while working out. And there is freely downloadable music out there. If I were to download a song at work or a friend's house, ...
    8. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      You dropped the statement before and after the one you quoted:

      And there is freely downloadable music out there. If I were to download a song at work or a friend's house, put it in my MP3 player I then wouldn't be able to transfer it back to my PC at home to add to my collection. Where is 'fair use' when the artist is giving away their music for free?

      Which indicates that he wants to download FREE music at work or at a friends house. At least that's the way I read it.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    9. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's stopping him from downloading it again at home? Nothing.

    10. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by exodus2 · · Score: 1

      But dosent he also say that its free music, ie the author wants it coppied.

      --
      .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
    11. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      C'mon people, we won't be taken seriously if we can't even learn the jargon.

      Why not abandon their language and re-frame the situation in new verbage? Never underestimate the ability of time and money to propagandize ideas. The intellectual property advocates use the language they do for good reason, they define the terms of the debate, they pronounce the foundations of the situation, they organize the logic so the only conclusion can be the one they desire.

      It is a very basic debating technique to question the basic assumptions of anothers arguemnt, when you disprove the foundation, something they rely upon, you can more easily disprove (by re-defining) their further conclusions - think house of cards.

      Why do you think the government talks in rhetoric and half-truths as they do? Its a trick of language, "learning their jargon" will only give the RIAA/MPAA/Plutocrats a head start in making you "wrong".

    12. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Hammer · · Score: 1

      maybe a 56Kb line to the ISP(or maybe even no line)
      Not everyone has DSL at home...

    13. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, I used to download music all the time on my 56k modem... was it slower? sure, but thats what sleep is for...

    14. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by chrisv · · Score: 1
      Even under the "license" model. The person has purchased a license to listen to a piece of music. The media in which it is stored is irrelevant. Of course if the RIAA ever switched to a convoluted EULA like MS's...

      I could have sworn that even Microsoft's EULA allowed you to keep *archival* copies of the software. That doesn't mean that I can legally install the software on 5 machines but it is perfectly legal for me to burn a copy of my Win95 CD-ROM for backup purposes.

      In fact, I believe that the part about "archival copies" is part of copyright law, at least in the US, which is why I want to seriously bludgeon all of the software companies here in the US that put out copy-protected CDs in the first place - it's generally nice to be able to put away your original copies of stuff, especially if you're prone to destroying CDs.

      --

      Dogma: Dead (mostly because your Karma ran it over)

    15. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      the correct term would be the Home recording Act of 1992

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    16. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the question "Where is the 'fair use' there?" it sounds like the poster understood perfectly that "fair use" in terms of legal use of copyrighted works includes the right to listen to the single copy of music that you bought as many times as you want in as many different mediums as you want. If you buy a CD and want to be able to punch it into old TTY paper tape rolls and stencil it on your ass, it is a violation of your fair use rights for some scum-sucking assholes like the RIAA to try to stand in your way. If you want to build an optical character reader to read the dots off your ass and copy them back into your PC, where you can play them out a high quality sound card and enjoy the musical notes therein, that too is fair use, and the slime-molds that make up the RIAA have no right to attempt to regulate those that would manufacture the optical character readers, sound cards, MP3 players, or any other tools that you might use to manipulate the copy of the music that you bought for your own listening pleasure.

      Cheers!

    17. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      the correct term would be the Home recording Act of 1992

      Nope. (can I say "Bzzzt! Wrong"? Please!) Check out RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia. The RIAA claimed the 1st Rio mp3 player was a recording device and should be covered by the AHRA. If that was true, making copies would be OK, but the player would have to have SCMS (which it did not).

      The judge (besides saying AHRA didn't apply) extended Sony v. Universal Studios (the Betamax case) which has affirmed time-shifting as a fair use, calling space-shifting (or media-shifting) a fair use also.

      As written in the code, fair use sounds much more limited. It seems to apply to educational and journalistic use (copying an excerpt from a book in order to review it), but case law has used the four tests (see Sony v. Connectix and Sega v. Accolade for instance) to extend the notion beyond that. Sony v. Connectix was decided after the DMCA went into effect, by the way.

      I'll save you a mouseclick:

      Sec. 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

      Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -

      (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether
      such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit
      educational purposes;
      (2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
      (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in
      relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
      (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or
      value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

    18. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      then it would seem that there is enough case law and Supreem court decisions that the DMCA would be struck down if the RIAA ever chalenged a circumvention device maker for copying Audio CDs.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    19. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by brassman · · Score: 2
      however the article specifically states copying a "friends" mp3 and taking it home to copy to his own collection...

      Wrong. "[D]ownload at a friend's house" could easily refer to using her cable modem to access some sort of paid account. Why should you be screwed by SDMI in that case? There's nothing illegitimate about the transaction.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    20. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by samyool · · Score: 1

      "But there is no way to remove or restrain my desire to exercise the rights guaranteed to a U.S. citizen under the U.S. Constitution "

      Forgive me for apparently missing the obvious, but what on earth does the U.S. Constitution have to do with how you use a CD?

      Unless it's being used to unlawfully force you to speak, or, conversely, used to unlawfully suppress your speech, et cetera, I fail to see how this part of your comment is in any way meaningful.

    21. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in NZ you're legally allowed to make personal backups of all digital data ;-), although that will probably be changing :-(

    22. Re:I don't think that word means what you think... by gig · · Score: 2

      > So what's stopping him from downloading
      > it again at home? Nothing.

      What if your friend has a couple of gigabytes of totally free MP3's that he put together using his fast DSL or cable modem? Should he give you a list of URL's so you can download them yourself on your 56k line, or should you just plug in your iPod and get them all in a few minutes?

  13. Rio 500 by Bullschmidt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its old, so you probably can't buy it new, but the RIO 500 rocks. It uses SmartMedia, has no copy protection, and came with 64MB built in. The smartmedia cards are now pretty cheap, so its not too bad to buy lots of these tiny cards. It has pretty good battery life (a little less than 10 hours if you are actively - triggering the backlite - using it). It runs on a single AA, is rugged, and light. It has nice sound quality (the earphones that come with it suck though). I recommend one if you can find it.

    --
    "Of all days, the day on which one has not laughed is the most surely the one wasted." -Sebastian Roch Nicol
    1. Re:Rio 500 by jspectre · · Score: 1

      I have to second the vote for the Rio500. I have mine and a few 32/64M cards and 0 complaints. It works just fine, great battery life (I get 15 or so hrs) and 128M is good for over a hour of music. It takes 10-15 minutes to fill up (over USB) which isn't too bad. No moving parts to break, is very small and very light weight. I haven't found a mp3 player yet that has seduced me to replace it (even Apple's iPod).

      I bet if you looked around on eBay or such you might find a used one.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    2. Re:Rio 500 by jspectre · · Score: 1

      Just a further note.. a quick scan of eBay lists quite a few 500's for less than $100 easy, most are around $50-60.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    3. Re:Rio 500 by Null_Packet · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Check this post too.

    4. Re:Rio 500 by borzwazie · · Score: 1

      Read to the end of the thread. It notes that the problem was with a Belkin USB hub that the guy was using...

      --

      "We apologize for the inconvenience."

    5. Re:Rio 500 by furiousgeorge · · Score: 3, Informative

      another vote for the R500 - i've got one and it's great. The only caveats:

      -the off/lock/on switch. When trying to lock the player it's TOO easy to turn it off. And it doesn't remember the place in the song you were - only what song. It's stupid, but i hit this all the time and it's annoying. The switch should be off/on/lock, or put lock on another switch.

      -the supplied headphones are sucky. Spend $15 and get another set.

      -i get a min of 10hours out of a single AA battery. Kickass.

      -i don't think it takes >64MB smartmedia cards (i may be wrong). I always downsample the stuff to the portable at 96Kbs, so that gets me a good 2 hours with minimal glitches.

      -it may be just my player, but it's not very shock resistant. i use it at the gym, and if it gets tapped with even more than a slight touch it jumps songs and stops playing (even when locked). Maybe a lose wire somewhere, but it's always done it.

      otherwise - highly recommended.

    6. Re:Rio 500 by Pyrgnome · · Score: 1

      I concur wholeheartedly. I've had mine for about two years, and can attest to its ruggedness. I've dropped mine onto concrete about four times, from waste height, and the only thing wrong with it is that I now require an elastic band to keep the battery in.

    7. Re:Rio 500 by Arethan · · Score: 2

      Here here!
      Rio 500's are great. I've got one as well.
      64MB onboard memory, and it'll accept a 64MB smartmedia card, giving you 128MB of total space. Playback is quite good, and from what I've seen, it only glitches in the same places where winamp glitches. (I encode all my stuff to 192Kb/s, and glitches don't happen very often.) Plus, it was cheap! $150 at the time of purchase.

      Everyone seems to be complaining about the headphones, but mine seem fine to me. Good bass, good treble, mids seem fine as well. Granted, their not anything like my studio quality Sony headphones, but they are light and fold-up for smaller size during transport. Great for my work out needs.

    8. Re:Rio 500 by jspectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [1] Hmm. I never have a problem with the switch on mine.

      [2] Most players come with crappy headsets, but that's ok. I would much rather use my headset-of-choice that I spent $ on than the cheap earbuds most suppily as an afterthought.

      [3] Yep. Gotta love the battery life.

      [4] Right now they only take up to 64M cards, Rio did come out with a firmware update not too long ago. I bet if there was enough demand they might update it again. I haven't seen 128M cards at prices I would consider buying but I haven't checked around in a while. I'm happy with the cards I have now (2x 32M and 1x 64).

      [5] Has to be your player. I've done everything from dropping mine to having it accidently ripped off of me (watch those headset cords) and it kept on going and going and going.. It's built like a tank AFAIK.

      Should also be mentioned it has a good backlight, very customizable settings (repeats, bookmarks, a simple EQ) and nice display which will scroll ID3 tags. Only complaint is if you have all tags visible the font is rather small (if you have less tags visible it will use a larger font).

      With the relatively low prices for used ones on eBay it wouldn't be a bad buy for someone's 1st MP3 player..

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    9. Re:Rio 500 by duckie13 · · Score: 1

      -it may be just my player, but it's not very shock resistant. i use it at the gym, and if it gets tapped with even more than a slight touch it jumps songs and stops playing (even when locked). Maybe a lose wire somewhere, but it's always done it.

      Yep, mine too. I love the damn thing, but I dropped it a couple of times, and since then the slightest taps cause it to shut off and reset itself - really sucks when you're driving with it. I don't know if it should be opened though - maybe some padding in there is moved, but I don't really wanna mess with it, just in case. Any ideas anyone?

      --
      "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    10. Re:Rio 500 by Null_Packet · · Score: 2

      I read that thread and more. Results vary in support for the 500, and I have had varying to no results on my Dell Inspiron.

    11. Re:Rio 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 128meg card in my rio500. You need to the the firmware uppdate to use any more than 64meg though.

    12. Re:Rio 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the current Rio 500 firmware supports 128 Mbyte SmartMedia cards. The unit itself supports up to 256 Mbytes of internal flash, if your willing to solder more and/or larger flash chips onto the board. (This VOIDS the warrenty.)

      I believe the current Rio 600/800/Nike units only have DRM for WMA files.

    13. Re:Rio 500 by rnd() · · Score: 2

      I got my Rio 500 to work just fine under Windows XP. I simply downloaded the latest RioPort software and the driver bundle for Windows 2000.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    14. Re:Rio 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i use it at the gym, and if it gets tapped with even more than a slight touch it jumps songs and stops playing (even when locked). Maybe a lose wire somewhere, but it's always done it. "

      I had that problem too- it seems that the contacts holding the battery in place wear out after a while- if it gets bumped, the springs lose contact with the battery and it loses power and resets. I fixed this by just using tweezers to pry the contacts back out so that they hold the battery firmly. I've had my 500 for 2 years now and have only had to do this twice.

    15. Re:Rio 500 by hearingaid · · Score: 2
      it may be just my player, but it's not very shock resistant. i use it at the gym, and if it gets tapped with even more than a slight touch it jumps songs and stops playing (even when locked). Maybe a lose wire somewhere, but it's always done it.

      I used to have this problem. I figured it out and it's stopped happening.

      The problem is that the battery gets jostled and loses its connection. That's why the Rio dies even if it's locked; no power = no power. :)

      The solution is to make sure the battery is absolutely secure in the case. You know the little cord-like bit that sticks out in the battery slot? When you put a new battery in, pull it up and wrap it around the battery. Works like a charm, and converts the Rio into something suitable for rollerblading and other high-energy activities.

      BTW - 10 hours out of a single battery? You must be less deaf than me; I've never gotten anywhere over four or five. :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    16. Re:Rio 500 by kenthorvath · · Score: 2
      And now for the downfalls: First of all, the rioPort software sucks - find a better amateur solution (I like riorio).

      Secondly, only 64 MB? You have to be JOKING!! Smart media isn't exactly the cheapest storage and even at 128MB Maximum capacity with the newest firmware it still sucks.

      Woohoo! 10 hours of battery life and 10% of it gets sucked down the tubes everytime you format and refill the player with new songs (and you have to pretty often). There should be an A/C adapter that comes with the thing for this purpose or it should draw power from the USB port or something...

      Yes, the headphones REALLY suck. They suck with the RioVolt, too...

      Save your money, get a RioVolt, buy cheap CD-R's and have a bonus CD-Player to go along with it. There's a new version coming out soon that has an LCD display on the remote control. I have a car adapter for mine and a library of about 40 CD's filled with every piece of music I could ever want to listen too. The remote feature is particularly useful for the car.

      This is just my opinion. Don't flamebait me...

    17. Re:Rio 500 by CapnGib · · Score: 1

      -it may be just my player, but it's not very shock resistant. i use it at the gym, and if it gets tapped with even more than a slight touch it jumps songs and stops playing (even when locked). Maybe a lose wire somewhere, but it's always done it.

      This happened on mine. The springy battery contact is very thin and got compressed. Just extend the contact a bit and should be fine.

      -i don't think it takes >64MB smartmedia cards (i may be wrong). I always downsample the stuff to the portable at 96Kbs, so that gets me a good 2 hours with minimal glitches.

      They keep telling me support for 128MB+ SM cards is coming anyday now. I think they are lying. I downsample too, but that gets annoying. I found a prog somewhere that would downsample while transfering files to the Rio, but it didn't work so good.

      You forgot to say that the RioPort software sucks hiney.

      --
      Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
    18. Re:Rio 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      believe the current Rio 500 firmware supports 128 Mbyte SmartMedia cards. The unit itself supports up to 256 Mbytes of internal flash, if your willing to solder more and/or larger flash chips onto the board.

      Is this true? Can you provide any more information?

    19. Re:Rio 500 by jnewmano · · Score: 1

      I've had my rio 500 for a year now and I am shocked that is still works. I have had it fall from the top of my car, kicked, dropped, etc, and it still works. The original user interface on the thing sucked originally, as it could only support 32 mB cards, and didn't support id3 tags. After updating the firmware I loved it.
      I wouldn't waste my money on any of the newer rio models, since they use special memory "backpacks" and not the standard smart media cards.

      Overall, my rio hasn't disappointed me.

    20. Re:Rio 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be done. But you have to be able to solder small surface mount parts. You also may need to remove the current flash parts from the unit (depending on how much you want to add). Removing surface mount parts isn't easy.

      Different production runs of the 500 used various brands of flash parts, with different sizes and number of parts to get the 64 Mbytes of internal storage.

      I don't remember the supported flash parts, I'll see if I can find out. The FPGA on the board may limit which parts are supported on a specific board.

      I cheated, I had a tech at work do it. (I'm not good enough with a soldering iron to do it myself.) Of course I worked at Diamond/Rio at the time which made things simpler...

      I highly recomend you NOT do this if it's your only MP3 player. Pick up a cheap one on eBay and play.

  14. CD based....the way to go.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If your worried about SDMI, then the CD based ones ar the way to go. CD's fit an INCREDIBLE amount of music on it (most fit more then I would need for the six hour trip down to my parents house.......), they are reliable, cheap and best of all, if you decide to buy a regular CD on the road, just pop it in and your jamming. I plan on getting one soon. I know, they are not as sexy and small as the solid state ones, but you can't beat them right now. to get 650 megs of storage on a small mp3 player is impossible as well as expensive unless someone figures out a way to use or build cheaper chips.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:CD based....the way to go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any units that use the smaller CD format? The 5"
      units are annoying to carry, and the 3" cd's can hold a decent amount of music.

      Thanks,
      Mark

    2. Re:CD based....the way to go.... by Nastard · · Score: 2

      I mentioned in an earlier post that I have a Kenwood z919. To your point, I'll say that it will take 700mb disks, and hold ~12 hours of music at 128kbps (which is great for highway driving). The benefits? AM/FM for listing to weather, traffic, etc, being able to play store-bought or friend-brought cd's, and a media (shiny little disks) that people are familiar with. This ensures that I can ask a passenger to switch disks for me without fear that they will screw it up (I guess that could be an argument for safe driving).

    3. Re:CD based....the way to go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and the rio volt is flashable so it can support new music formats as they come out. There are rumors it will have ogg support in the future, it already has wma and mp3 support, and the last flash I did for it upgraded its menuing system and the ways in which i could organize playlists. If it does get ogg support, (I think the floating point math ogg uses is a problem) then this player will probably be pretty unique among the ones out there.

    4. Re:CD based....the way to go.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Philips has a 3 inch version of their eXpanium. Not sure of it's availablity as not that long ago it was in a beta test (announced on here....do a search) that anyone could sign up for. I would not mind having one of these as well as a 5 inch variety because at least the 5 inch one can play plain old music CD's as well.

      --

      Gorkman

  15. Archos Jukebox - USB Hard Drive / MP3 Player by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Archos Jukebox is a combination USB hard drive (6 gig, upgradeable) and MP3 player. It exerts absolutely no control over what you put on the hard drive, and works with any computer with a USB driver. (I don't know what the included "MusicMatch" software is for, I never installed it.)

    It is a little bulky for carying around, but is great for use in the car and office.

    1. Re:Archos Jukebox - USB Hard Drive / MP3 Player by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Archo is SCMS compliant (link), from our friend of the riaa (link)

  16. Copying from portable to PC? by MrSpock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never understood any good scenarios for copying from a portable player to a PC. It seems to me that if you managed to put a song which you own on the portable in the first place, then you have a copy _already_on_ your PC. If you want to move the song from PC to PC, a LAN or even a ZIP disk seems to be far more efficient than using the portable as the transfer mechanism.

    Am I missing something obvious?

    1. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only used copyback for computer files. I'll bring my Archos to my coworkers house, listen to MP3s on the subway, and have my source code with me ready for download when I get there.
      I could also imagine wanting to bring MP3s to the office and store them on the computer there, in which case why carry a zip disk in addition to your MP3 player?

    2. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by asukarno · · Score: 1

      Supposed you going to your friend house, and he or she have some particular songs that you dont have on your PC. However he or she have the same MP3 player as yours. So, transfering to portable isn;t a bad choice then you can save it to your PC later.

      I think this is a good scenario, consider if your friends might only use a modem while you want to copy over 10 songs :-)

    3. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1
      I'm at a friend's house. My library (in my Archos) is in the car, hers in on her PC. We're talking, her music is playing. Something I like and didn't know about comes on. Cool!

      I get the Archos from the car, plug it into her computer via USB. Drag & drop file transfer.

      You hear the song, you want it then. If it sticks to you, later you buy the album to get more.

    4. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are. I have some CDs that I've ripped to my work computer, and some that I've ripped to my home computer. One of reasons I'd like a portable is so that I can get my collections in synch without re-ripping my CDs or burning a bunch of CD-Rs.

      The computers in question aren't on a LAN, and only one has a zip drive. Even if they both had one, it would take a whole lot of zip disks to move the music back and forth.

    5. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      2 assumptions your making:

      1 - Everyone has access to a lan or other high-speed connection

      2 - Everyone has a zip-disk

      I can think of several people who are in groups 1 and 2, and as such using a portable would make sense, assuming they already had one. If they didn't, it would probably be cheaper to get a zip disk drive and some disks.

    6. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, only that's piracy.

      A better scenario is to migrate mp3s from home to your work computer for your personal use there.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally he assumes:

      A zip disk is big enough for what you want to transfer.

      You carry a sufficient quantity of zip disks whenever you carry your MP3 player.

    8. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 2

      Yes you're missing something obvious. My home PC and work PC aren't on the same LAN. Neither of them has a ZIP drive. There are no broadband ISPs offering service in my area. A portable hard drive is the best solution. If the portable hardrive also has a rechargable battery, LCD screen, control buttons, MP3 decoder, and audio output, all the better. Mine is a NEO 2200 with a 20GB drive. When I need to upgrade the drive it will be easy because the hard drive compartment is as easy to open as the battery compartment. No tools required.

    9. Re:Copying from portable to PC? by HalfFlat · · Score: 2

      It's not piracy, it's illegal copying.

      Both are illegal, sure, but that's about all they have in common.

  17. NexII by twenex · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check out the NexII from FrontierLabs. It is $99 with 0 memory, but takes compactflash cards. They are < $90 for 256MB these days (check out Pricewatch).


    When you get to work, offload the CompactFlash card with a PCMCIA adaptor ($12) to your laptop or a USB adaptor ($25) to your desktop.


    Oh, I should mention, the NexII sounds good too, but you want to dump the headphones they ship.

    1. Re:NexII by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      I've gotta give this thing mad props, too. I just got mine yesterday and it's more than I expected. I knew it was going to be a small unit, but I didn't really realize how small it was going to be.

      They even included a nice little neoprene carrying case and four 'NEXkins' (different colors of little paper inserts for looks) for it. I got mine with a 128 MB CF card and all I did was throw some batteries in, plug in the CF card and plug it in through the USB port. Under Win2000, it was instantly recognized and added as a drive. They don't try and make you use anykind of proprietary software (but they do bundle it with Win Media Player 7 and Media Jukebox) and they proudly advertise that they are Non-SDMI. There is a cool little spectrum display and it's backlit by a pretty blue light. It recognizes the tags, can handle repeat one, all, or shuffle or can be programmed. Battery life is supposed to be about 20 hrs. on a pair of AA's, or about 4 hours if you're running a 1GB IBM Microdrive. The unit sounds nice and clear. The volume maxes out at 25, but I've found around 12 to be plenty of volume. Additionally, I like the headphones. They're the type that hook over the tops of your ears and the bar comes down around the back of your neck. I was looking for something to snowboard with and those headphones stay nicely out of the way of my helmet. I originally stumbled across it on E-bay, but I ended up just purchasing it from their homepage. FrontierLabs. Read this review. MP3.com liked it too. 5 Stars.
    2. Re:NexII by fajoli · · Score: 1

      I have one of these, and have been very happy with it. It is small enough to slip into your pocket at the gym. It works as a disk drive under linux and windows. The batteries easily account for over half of its weight.

      I agree, the headphones are uncomfortable, but they are easily replaced by a nice pair of earbuds.

    3. Re:NexII by delorean · · Score: 1
      but you want to dump the headphones they ship

      did you mean "the headphones they ship [with the device]" or did you mean "the headphones, they shit" ?

      --
      "You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas"
      Sen. Davy Crocket to US Congress, Nov. 1, 1835
    4. Re:NexII by skeurto · · Score: 1

      Probably too late for a response, but

      will it support .ogg?

      does it work under linux?

    5. Re:NexII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nex II has upgradeable software...easy as pie to make work.
      You might want to ask the folk at Frontier Labs if they plan support .ogg

  18. Fair use -- my take by aclute · · Score: 3, Troll

    Let us not forget: Fair-use means that it is not illegal to make a back-up copy, or to timeshift, etc, if you can do it.

    Fair-use is not a doctrine that states the owners must make it *easy* to copy, or even possible.

    Now the DMCA makes it a little bit sticky inregards to being able to copy stuff for fair-use, but even pre-DMCA, there was no contract between seller and buyer that the seller would make it easy to copy.

    1. Re:Fair use -- my take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, everyone here seems to be calling it "stealing" too.

    2. Re:Fair use -- my take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ah, but if record companies join together to try to stop non-SDMI players, then they are violating anti-trust laws. Record companies don't have to make it easy for people to exercise their rights, but they do not have the right to join together to stifle competition (non-SDMI players). If they do that, then they are committing a far more serious crime than copying a CD.

      Of course, enforcing such laws is another matter. We better open up our piggy banks, because it'll take a lot of counter-bribes to get the law enforced.

  19. have you been asleep this past month? by vecna_99 · · Score: 1
    --
    --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
  20. iPod by Xibby · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about the iPod? I'm not up on it's specs, but plug it into your firewire and it shows up as a hard drive right? (On Mac's anyway ;) And the firmware on the thing is upgradable, so maybe, just maybe, it will suppot ogg sometime in the future. Or somebody will hack ogg support for it.

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  21. CD Player by tubs · · Score: 1

    I've got a Goodmans one (came with a carkit too - my car is old and crap) it only cost £50, what maybe $75, although probably cheaper.

    Only things are it doesn't do CD/RW discs, makes some "popping" noises now and again, but otherwise pretty much okay.

    --

    try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

  22. Build on yourself by vnsnes · · Score: 1

    There are lots of plans around the Web to build any kind of mp3 player you can wish. One of the sites that consolidates links to mp3 projects is here.

  23. Rio is the way to go for now.... by bahtama · · Score: 1
    I bought the Rio a few weeks ago and can't remember what I did before that. I use a tape adapter for the car and it works perfect! I put it in the glove box and then clip the remote control to something near me, or my clothes, and away it goes! You can have it shuffle or play in order. It also reads directories so its nice to be able to organize your music on your pc like that and then just burn directories. I highly recommend it over anything else because of the amount of music you can store.

    The AC adapter is nice, but I haven't really used it that much yet. The skip protection is just plain silly, I can swing it around and shake it and it doesn't care.

    So, the bottom line in case it isn't obvious is that the Rio is the best solution for now.

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  24. yes, you are by crayz · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something obvious?

    The iPod holds 5GB of data, far more than a Zip or even Jaz/Orb disk. Plus you don't need to have that drive on the second machine(just need a FW port).

    Also, the two machines are not always on a LAN. And 400Mbps is a fast transfer.

  25. If you're considering the Rio Volt, consider this. by aidoneus · · Score: 2
    The AVC Soul is essentially the exact same thing as the Volt, right down to the remote and the flashable firmware (although I have yet to hack the firmware for the Volt so that it works on the Soul, but the Soul's latest version is pretty good as well). The nice thing about the Soul is that it also supports m3u playlists (with the 1.05s firmware), it reads CD-RWs (both regularly burned and packet written) and is generally available for $15-20 less than the Rio Volt. The money you save is more than the cost of shipping in most cases too.


    Just my 2 cents.


    -Jason

  26. New Sony Clie' by raist_online · · Score: 1

    I've just got a new Sony PEG-770C and it rocks - if you just use plain old blue memory sticks you can put what you like on them and trasfer up and down no probs (It helps if you have a Vaio with a memory stick slot, of course *8-) - really good battery life too!

    I'm not sure about the white 'MagicGate' memory sticks - I think they have built-in protection?

    Raist

    --
    The problem with the rat race is, even if you win, you're still a rat!
    1. Re:New Sony Clie' by puck01 · · Score: 1

      The Clie is a viable option. I have one. I did not buy it for mp3 use, but it certainly works for such. If all you are looking for is an mp3 player, I would not recommend the Clie. It only supports 3 different bitrates, the hightest being 133 or something weird like that.

      Also, I use a 64 mb white 'MagicGate' sony memory stick to put my mp3's on. It works fine. No copy protection as far as I can tell. I haven't tried to copy mp3's off of it to my computer, but I doubt that is a problem. It comes up on windows as a removable storage device and you can copy files to and fro without a problem. I don't think mp3's will be any different. Anyone know for sure? I check it out when I get home.

      puck

    2. Re:New Sony Clie' by Cardinal+Ximinez · · Score: 1

      I've got the N760C. You can encode MP3s normally (up to 132K or 133K) and just transfer them over into the appropriate folder on a regular blue/purple Memstick. I don't think the player on the Clie supports playlists this way (it plays them in the order they were transferred to the Memstick.)

      You can also use the bundled Real Jukebox or Sony OpenMG software to manage the music. There are more encoding options and I think it will use playlists, but you can only use the white MagicGate Memsticks (SDMI - blech!).

      I don't use mine primarily as an MP3 player, but it does the job for my off and on usage. Purple Memsticks are very competively priced compared to Compact Flash and Smart Media (especially if you can find a dealer that carries the Lexar Memsticks). Pretty good battery life too, especially if the display is turned off during playback.

    3. Re:New Sony Clie' by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Why is this post at -1? Are all those links contained Goatse.cx redirects or something. Do yourself a favor and mod this dude up.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  27. Cheap, works well... by Coins · · Score: 1
  28. Rio 500 by Null_Packet · · Score: 2

    As long as you don't need it to work with XP (No Flames Please), then go with the Rio500.

    They have Windows support (95-2000) that lets you load and erase music on the unit only, while the Linux drivers and apps let you copy music on and off the device. They come with 64 Megs already, and you can add a Smart Media card for more.

    It's an older MP3 player, sure. Capacity is where you'll take the hit, but if you want to use it as you will, and assuming you're a Linux user, the Rio500 should do fine.

  29. MD players by atom6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another no-copy-protection alternative is Minidisc player/recorders -- I switched from an MP3 player about a year ago and I've been pretty happy. They have their drawbacks and can be slightly more expensive (mine was about $300), but the discs are much cheaper than memory cards and can hold a lot more music (up to 5 or 6 hours in the most extended format), and the audio quality is at least marginally better.
    As far as I know, there is no security technology on the horizon for MD media. And with the USB-based "MD link" that's now included with most players, it's virtually as easy to record things off of a random friend's computer as it would be with an MP3 player.
    The only big drawback is that they record in real time (so, for example, 40 minutes of music would take 40 minutes to record.) And recording from an MD onto your computer is a little bit more of a hassle. But other than that, I'd say they're worth checking out.

    1. Re:MD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, MiniDiscs do have a sort of SDMI (I believe it's called SCMS), but only for digital recording between MD players with digital/optical connectors. Once a song is recorded digitally it gets tagged so that it can't be used to make another digital copy.

      Of course if you use analog recording there's no copy protection. If you use good quality cables and equipment the difference between digital and analog should be negligible.

      Also, in early 2002 Sony (and other companies I'm sure) will be introducing MD players that support the NetMD standard. They supposedly support 4x recording through a USB connection. From Sony's press release it looks like they use the same 1-digital-copy-only SCMS system, but I wouldn't be surprised if Sony changes it in the future.

    2. Re:MD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very happy with my Sony MZ-R700PC. It is especially nice when recording CD's using the included optical cable. If selecting a CD based option, I would make sure it is Jog-Proof.

    3. Re:MD players by rthille · · Score: 1

      You can (or at least you used to be able to) get a home-stereo unit with both a MD and a CD drive, and do 4X copying from the CD to the MD.

      I much prefer the bandwidth of selecting a stack of MD's to take with me in the car to trying to pick the songs from a play list and waiting for them to download over USB (for my jogging MP3 player)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    4. Re:MD players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Sony line of MD recorders, called Net-MD's, all have USB connctivity that enables transfer of 80 min music in about 3 minutes from your PC. the supplied software enables trasfer of material from CDDA, mp3 and wma ...

      pictures of Net MD MZN707 /MZN505 can be found at Sony ...

      http://news.sel.sony.com/pressroom/digitalimages /i ndex?folder_id=118688

  30. Rio Volt by EisPick · · Score: 2

    In a way you answered your own question by listing the Rio Volt CD player as an option. If you burn all your MP3s onto CD, this isn't an issue. Of course, if a machine doesn't have a CD burner on it you won't be able pull music off of it.

    Before you buy a Volt, make sure you listen to one. I bought the cheapie SP90 version for my car. There is an audible chirp/hiss in the audio output. In the car, it's not a major issue, because the hiss is competing with road noise, wind noise and engine noise. But it's definitely not hi-fi enough for headphones or a home system.

    According to a review I saw somewhere (I think it was CNet), the Volt 250 has this same problem, so caveat emptor.

    1. Re:Rio Volt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can the anti skip suck? I have a rio and about 90% of the time(maybe more) the cd isn't even spinning. I mean it spins the cd for half a second and seems to have all the info on what its playing for the next 30 seconds or so. Maybe in normal cd audio mode the battery life sucks, I've gotten decent battery life out of mine though, more than a discman from sony(but thats probably cause the cd doesn't spin so much).

    2. Re:Rio Volt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      up to 128 ? hmm maybe it downsamples but I've played 192 mp3s just fine. You might need to upgrade your firmware from the rio site. They seem to have improved a few of the features, and made a lot of things more customizable..
      In fact I'm sure your up to 128k sample rate is wrong
      read it straight from rio's site.
      click here to read for yourself
      you'll notice under bitrate it says 32-320 Kbps

    3. Re:Rio Volt by Jose · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree on the battery life statement..I can easily get over 12 hours listening to MP3 CDs on a new set of duracell/energizers..I have yet to try rechargables though.

      The skipping can be harsh though. I carry it in my inside pocket in a large winter jacket, and it skips a fair amount.

      --
      The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
  31. Apple iPod by Josuah · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Apple iPod does not have any "anti-piracy" features built in. Specifically, it states something to the effect of "Piracy is a social issue, not a technological one" on the packaging. You can use it with Windows (via Mediafour's XPod) or Macs, and probably soon with Linux. If you use the iPod as a portable drive on a Mac, you can simply copy files back and forth at will. But if you use iTunes to sync, the MP3 files are invisible. Some information on this is available here, and here's a simple utility to access the invisible MP3 files.

    Also, the iPod supports a variety of encodings. It should support up to 256Kbps (or is it 320Kbps?), variable bit rate, joint stereo or normal stereo, because that's what iTunes supports. The 1000 songs it advertises is for 160Kbps songs.

    1. Re:Apple iPod by gig · · Score: 2

      iTunes does 320Kbps, so iPod probably does as well. You can also use uncompressed AIFF or WAVE audio if you want super high quality and don't mind storing a lot fewer songs. The 5GB drive in iPod stores 1000 songs at 160Kbps, but will probably only store about 125 in uncompressed AIFF.

  32. When your jogging or working out, go for the RIO by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    CD and HD based MP3 players just aren't up to an hour on a treadmill or two on the pavement. I still carry my ol' Rio 300 which stores about 30 minutes of music and several smartmedia cards to finish the trip. I'll probably upgrade to a Rio 500 when I get around to it, but the 300 still works for me.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  33. you thief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you ever want to copy music back from your player to your desktop unless you were stealing it from someone else's computer? I don't see this sdmi thing being a problem in real world applications...

    1. Re:you thief! by gig · · Score: 2

      > Why would you ever want to copy music back
      > from your player to your desktop unless you
      > were stealing it from someone else's computer?

      Sometimes I write a song, make a few different mixes of it, put them on my MP3 player, go down to the beach and listen to them, stop by my guitarist's house and play it for him, and then I have to go home and email him a copy because the MP3 files that I made won't copy off a NomadII. All other kinds of files will, though.

      A workaround is to remove the ".mp3" suffix on the files and then you can do what you please. A better workaround is that I'm going to get an iPod.

      > I don't see this sdmi thing being a problem
      > in real world applications...

      YOU don't see it being a problem, but there are 6 billion people in the world, and lots of unforeseen possibilities and future technologies. I have a portable DAT player that I NEVER use now because of SCMI. DAT tapes are fragile as hell, so only having one digital master is ridiculous. Everything that goes on DAT first ends up eventually getting recorded (using analog outs) to a computer. What a chore.

  34. iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPAQ + PCMCIA sleeve + 25G IBM PCMCIA HD* + Cassette adapter = problem solved!

    (*Don't remember the url, but some guy with a japanese sounding name has a free CE driver that should work for this)

    -josh
    josh at alumni dot southern dot NOSPAMedu

    1. Re:iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds expensive, you might as well save several hundred dollars and get a 20gb Archos jukebox, its smaller too.

  35. Use your head..Get a Casio PZ-5000 instead. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    Here's a good reccomendation for you:

    I love mine..got a Casio PZ-5000 about a month ago. Its an portable Audio CD + MP3 CD player , complete with digital shock absorbpion, car casette adapter, headphones, DC to AC converter for plugging into your car's lighter, two batteries and a normal wall-outlet AC adapter for $79.00 ... You can buy them off the rack at CompUSA. That way, you can burn your own Audio CDs, or burn an ISO9660 packed to the brim with MP3s. A remarkably cheap price for such a nice player, basically, an 800MB portable MP3 player for the price. Why anyone would want one of those shitty compact-flash powered MP3 players is beyond me. Then again, if you feel like spending $300 for an MP3 player with less features, be my guest. :)

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Use your head..Get a Casio PZ-5000 instead. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Right now I would like any CD based MP3 player(as a gift for Christmas) but if I were buying my own, I would want a Rio Volt or any with a BIG LCD and that can read ID3 tags. If it navigates by only numbers, it's a real pain in the butt to navigate with only up and down keys and numbers. The Rio Volt (all models) displays ID3 tags. I would also like a genre specific play mode and a album play mode (play all files in a stated folder

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Use your head..Get a Casio PZ-5000 instead. by neurojab · · Score: 1

      One question:
      Can you jog with it?
      I can't with my expanium, so I still use my Rio500 on a regular basis. I would buy another one if it broke. Flash-based players are pretty much the only option for jogging. FM radio fades in and out, cassetes wow and flutter like mad, CD players skip... then there's the weight.

    3. Re:Use your head..Get a Casio PZ-5000 instead. by Taloon · · Score: 0

      The iPod has 32megs of solid-state memory as a buffer. It fills it up then spins the drive down so it only has to access it every half hour or so (depending on bitrate of course).

      I imagine it's rather light, being so small, it uses a drive smaller than a laptop drive. The only thing preventing me from buying one is the price.

  36. Yepp by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    I've had no trouble with my Samsung Yepp. AFAIK it needs windows software to transfer files, but it doesn't care a lick about what the files are or where they came from. My LAME encoded VBR files sound fantastic on it. Stuff obtained elsewhere on the Internet is fine too.

    Considering it comes with 128MB out of the box, it's a good buy. I advise however ditching the headphones and the remote, and plugging a good pair of headphones directly into the unit. I only wish for a better design and a built-in rechargable battery with charging stand.

    1. Re:Yepp by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I should note I was speaking of the "Techno Yepp," as opposed to the CD, Hip-Hop, Mini, or Pendant Yepp.

    2. Re:Yepp by Hobbex · · Score: 2


      Part of the SDMI spec (what we have seen) has been that the devices should be timebomb activated, meaning that the really audacious limitations could just pop up one morning when the RIAA feels you are sufficiently in the trap. It could also make that windows software you are trusting update the player firmware to whatever ridiculous scheme they have invented that day without even warning you.

      Trusting that the the company is only playing lip service to the enemy is a gamble, and not one I would recommend people taking.

  37. Re:If you're considering the Rio Volt, consider th by PureFiction · · Score: 2

    I have a RIO Volt, and it can play CD-RW's as well.

    I would highly reccomend this system. Simply burn firmware upgrades to a CD-RW and the player will upgrade as soon as it sees the file on the CD. Pretty slick.

    Audio quality is fine, although I dont thave the Volt-90 or whatever the cheapie model is (perhaps it has the problems)

    All in all a great system. You can pack quite a bit of music on a 700M CDR. I will listed for hours, sometimes days on end before it loops back to the beginning.

  38. Nomad Jukebox by JK+Flip+Flop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can copy mp3s back to a system with the latest firmware for the Nomad Jukebox.

  39. Fair use is not a right by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The term "fair use" simply means that you cannot be prosecuted for letting your friend read your book, or copying your CDs to different media and so on. It does not mean that the publishing companies have to make it easy (or even possible) for you to do so.

    Basically, "fair use" means you won't get in trouble for a little sharing, but it doesn't mean it'll be easy.

    1. Re:Fair use is not a right by JMZero · · Score: 1

      People here aren't (or shouldn't be) suggesting that "the industry" doesn't have the right to incorporate whatever sort of technology they want on these things. Heck, they've already made many CD's unusable by watermarking them with the voices of "N'Sync".

      What this article is about is "Where's a company that recognizes our rights?"

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    2. Re:Fair use is not a right by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      > Heck, they've already made many CD's unusable by watermarking them with the voices of "N'Sync".

      Funniest thing I've read all day.

      Thanks.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    3. Re:Fair use is not a right by Guy+Innagorillasuit · · Score: 0

      The question posed isn't "Why is the recording industry impeding my rights to fair use" but "What device can I purchase that makes it easy to exercise fair use". The industry can use whatever technologies they wish to prevent fair use, but if nobody buys devices that utilize such technology...

    4. Re:Fair use is not a right by eyeball · · Score: 2
      Basically, "fair use" means you won't get in trouble for a little sharing, but it doesn't mean it'll be easy.

      Of course hard or easy, if it's protected by some form of copy protection, under the DMCA, it's illegal to break the copy protection (or even discuss how to do so) even if it is for fair use.

      inal
      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    5. Re:Fair use is not a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct.

      However, the problem lies with the DMCA in that it makes the creation, possession, or distribution of a digital "circumvention device" illegal.

      Thus, the companies can make it difficult for the consumer to make backups of their media. And if the consumer needs to circumvent some means of copy protection - no matter how simple - then they are violating the law as stated in the DMCA...

      ...even though "fair use" legally allows them to copy the media.

      Fair use allows us to copy whatever we want -- AS LONG AS IT HAS **NO** COPY PROTECTION WHATSOEVER.

      You can thank the DMCA and your friendly representatives (who, in case you hadn't figured it out from this message, are NOT representing *your* opinions).

    6. Re:Fair use is not a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as I understand it "fair use" means, if I buy your CD, I can do whatever the hell I want with it, short of selling the music for money. If I want to convert, decode, mix, or whatever that music, I can (As long as I don't deny the ARTIST/RECORD Co. royalties). I'm at the point now where I'll say fuck it. I'll make my own damn music.

      Don't mistake talent for genius.

  40. Re:Women - The Myth of the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I would like to take a minute out to dispel a rumor that has been oozing around the Internet for quite sometime. This is a foul and insidious bit of gossip that's only used to provoke a negative reaction from people. Perhaps you've heard this rumor: That pubescent geek males have sex. Now, this thought is quite patently absurd. To begin with, pubescent geek males simply aren't handsome enough to get it. A PGM's mind is pre-programmed, if you will, to troll slashdot and download porn and little else. Chatting with a real live female is simply not in his genes. When put in front of a female, your typical PGM will stare at it before attempting to play quake III on it. Of course monkey's have been seen having sex, so it is theoretically possible that a PGM, guided by the all-powerful mind of a mature woman, might be able to kiss a female. Perhaps even with tongues. But lets enter the realm of imagination for a moment and we'll see why even if they had the mental control not to prematurely ejaculate, most little geeks still wouldn't get past first base. The reason for this is that most geeks simply lack the desire. All geeks find the greatest joy in life to be spent in the cellar installing mandrake, or in the shopping mall licking windows. While some geeks may dispute this, its a scientific fact that this is just a coy game some geeks play to attract a mate. Deep inside they all crave the glowing warmth that comes from overclocking an Athlon. So the next time you hear someone claiming to be a "geek" having sex, think twice. I am saddened to say this, but most likely it is nothing more than a wet dream. Remember what Egg Troll says: A geek couldn't get laid in a brothel with a 20 pound note tied around his cock. Thank you. [Ed. Note - It has since come to my attention that there have been reported sightings of geeks having sex. However, in all cases these geeks turned out to be train spotters. So if you should see a geek using the Internet, it will actually be a train spotter - a much superior race.]

  41. Handspring Visor by Evanrude · · Score: 1

    The Handspring Visor (any model) and the optional MiniJam MP3 Player could provide a viable solution. It comes with a 64mb memory card that does not limit which way the music (or any other data) can be transfered.

    --

    ~.Evanrude
  42. Rio by guinsu · · Score: 2

    I have the Rio 100, its great, its ugradable. It doesn't do ogg, but maybe it will some day. And its ability to handle subdirectories is better than any other cd based mp3 player I have seen, letting me keep everything really organized on my discs.

  43. Buy a Soulplayer DMP-01 by Da+w00t · · Score: 1

    The soulplayer is a mp3 cd player, and its tiny. it's user upgradable (burn a cd w/ DMP-01.HEX, and it flashes itself). For $145, it's a steal of a buy. I've been very happy with it. The Rio Volt is the same product, with a different skin.

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
  44. Automotive MP3 Head Units by F250SuperDuty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In addition to the subject at hand--are there any recomendations for car-based mp3 head units?
    The Empeg was quite nice--but expensive. Aiwa makes a unit that plays MP3's from
    CD-R's, but I've heard horrors about it. Has anyone had experience with an mp3 head unit that
    isn't rumoured to suck?

    -Kris

    1. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      go to http://www.carplayer.com and check out there cpm-25 unit. It uses a standard ide hard drive and hooks to your computer as a fat32 format drive. No drivers and no SDMI.

    2. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      I have the Aiwa uint, an my girlfriend has the second version with the mechanical front. It doesn't suck. The only think I would change about it is the gap between songs. What have you heard bad about it? I would recommend it.

    3. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by Markusis · · Score: 1

      I also have the CDC-MP3-2 (The second coming of AIWA's MP3 from CD-R player) I really like it. The mechanical front is really neat (no removable face to worry about). And, on top of that it displays ID3 tags and all of that. The only problem I have with it is that it plays MP3s in alphabetical order, so if you don't store your MP3s with the number of the track in them, you gotta put it there. I would recommend it though. Definitely.

    4. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I have a script to make the numbers before tracks have the correct number of leading zeros so that the tracks play in the expected order. I tried the kenwood ones and they do this too, and my roommate has the sony Xplode version which also does this. I really wouldn't recommend the Sony unit. It doesn't support file names longer then 32 characters, and has a flimsy feel to it. It also has a weird control stick thingie on the front that i just can't stand.

    5. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by bracher · · Score: 1

      describe "rumoured to suck"...

      I've got an aiwa cdc-mp3, works great for me. I haven't listened to the radio during my commute in literally months. and it _really_ helps during long road trips; a cd holds a _lot_ of high-bitrate music.

      the only minor annoyance is that it won't restart mid-track. for me, not such a big deal.

      - mark

    6. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empeg is down to $700. Grab one before they are out of stock permanently. Sonic Blue won't be making any more after this batch.

      If I'm not mistaken, you can also use a hacked kernel that someone wrote to transfer files off of your Empeg. You can even use it to ferry files back and forth to work and home.

      -Ryan.

    7. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by underactive · · Score: 1

      The Phatbox definitely doesn't suck. They can describe it better than I can:

      "The PhatNoise Car Audio System is an MP3 player that works like a CD changer and stores several thousand music files right in your car. Using our software you can organize and then download your songs onto a DMS cartridge. You then plug the DMS into the PhatBox that is installed in your trunk. The system uses the CD changer controls on aftermarket and original equipment car stereos."

      Feature comparisons to Neo, Rio Car, and dedicated MP3 head units can be found here.
      It currently works with BMW and Audi factory units and Kenwood aftermarket head units. I'm currently in their Sony test program and I am loving it. I've got a 20Gig cart and I have access to my entire library on the road. Another thing that would appeal to the /. folks is that it's Linux powered. You need Windoze to use their playlist manager software, but there are instructions here on how to do everything you need under Linux.

      --
      my other computer is your Windows(tm) box...
    8. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might I add that if you look through the sources of emptool for the empeg unit, the calls for downloading songs off the machine are simply there (or where there, it was quite some time ago i look). But I agree, *get one* before they sell out. Even if no further development is done for this machine (which i doubt), it is one cool toy.. .z

    9. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by SnoopDobb · · Score: 1

      I have the Jensen MP5010K unit. It has great sound, supports MP3's up to 320kbps, reads CDs, CD-Rs, and CD-RWs, and is pretty cheap ($250). My *only* complaint is that you are apparently unable to search (ie: FF and REV) through MP3s. You can search through CDs, but not MP3s. To be honest, I don't miss it very often, but when it's missed, it's sorely missed.

      .sig

    10. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by TheMightyZog · · Score: 1

      I've heard good things about the JVC KD-SH99, good enough that once I think that my credit card balance is about $300 too low I'll pop for one.

      JVC KD-SH99 Forum

    11. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by modemboy · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, you could spend a couple of hundred $$$ on a mp3 car deck, but I suggest something different. Buy a deck with an audio input in it. Lots of decks have these, it's just a headphone sized jack on the faceplate. Then use those extra couple hundred bucks you saved to buy a phat portable mp3 player and just get a male->male headphone cord and your rockin out in no time.

    12. Re:Automotive MP3 Head Units by ponderz · · Score: 1

      There is a device called a FM modulator made my Arkon, http://www.arkon.com/SF100.htm, that allow you to listen to whatever you play with your FM reciever. I was looking all over the net for something like this a week ago. I couldn't find anything. I went to Fry's Electronic, the tech guy there showed me this. It has good sound quality, power in for my CDMP3 player for only 19.99!

  45. SDMI, so what? by JMZero · · Score: 1

    Whether they call it SDMI or WKRP or CBYNL, only a watermarking scheme will keep you from ripping audio from your CD (or from your Kazaa buddy's CD) to the player - and no current watermarking scheme is secure, thus any device currently available should suit your needs.

    Nonetheless, I'm going to boycott any CD with any sort of watermark (currently boycotting music is very easy, as very little is produced).

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  46. Terrapin Mine by asv108 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the Terrapin Mine handheld that is so heavily advertised on slashdot. It holds 10 gigs and runs on linux too.

    1. Re:Terrapin Mine by Abwh · · Score: 1

      I'm expecting mine to arrive actually... although I plan to use it more to free space on my digicam memory cards on the go, instead of waiting until I get to my PC.

      One thing to note is that battery lasts only 3-4 hours... and that's 4 AA's !!!

      So, not much use as a "on the go" mp3 player, but rather as a storage device...

      --
      Gerry -- #include "ea!.h"
    2. Re:Terrapin Mine by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

      ...and costs $650+

      --

      No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  47. SDMI?! by sulli · · Score: 2
    Isn't that dead as a doornail? Deader than OS/2? Deader than even *BSD?

    Seriously, I don't know of any MP3 player that won't play all your ex-Napster or Gnutella/Audiogalaxy/etc. mp3s. My iPod, which I think is fabulous, plays everything I put on it, so long as it's mp3 (sorry no ogg or wma). And I for one am damn sure that I won't run any "up"grade that takes away that ability - and the vendors (except Microsoft) know that too, which is why you don't have anything to worry about.

    But back up your tunes to CD-R anyway, in case of system crashes and other stuff - not just SDMI shenanigans.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:SDMI?! by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Apparently the iPod is an exception, not the rule.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:SDMI?! by sulli · · Score: 1

      Maybe so. But who in his/her right mind would run the "up"grade to SDMIze their Rio? I just don't see it.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:SDMI?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As dead as Linux's chances of taking over the desktop, server, or mainframe markets.

    4. Re:SDMI?! by glwtta · · Score: 1

      "SDMIze their Rio"

      hmm.. that sounds a lot like "sodomize" - I wonder if that was the intention?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:SDMI?! by sulli · · Score: 1
      If SCSI is "scuzzy" then SDMI is "sodomy." Of course!

      Reminds me of that old song from Hair ... sodomy, fellatio, etc.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    6. Re:SDMI?! by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I am not sure I want the good name of sodomy sullied by refernces to something as detestible as the SDMI.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    7. Re:SDMI?! by gig · · Score: 2

      > But who in his/her right mind would run
      > the "up"grade to SDMIze their Rio? I just
      > don't see it.

      Oh, you naive Mac/iPod -using bastard! We are spoiled all the time by Apple, and we take it so for granted. On Windows, there is something called a "stealth upgrade". It goes like this:

      "Download firmware 2.3.1. New features include improved audio quality, enhanced ID3 support, and better support for Windows XP."

      You go "GREAT!" and you download and flash your MP3 player to get the "improved" audio quality, "enhanced" ID3 support, and you also get some new SDMI trojan horse that constitutes "better support for Windows XP".

      Aside from that, though, this generation of MP3 players is like a bunch of test cases (iPod excepted). The SDMI stuff can sit idle and really become a nuisance to the average user in the next generation of players "because MP3 players have 'always' had SDMI". Your RIO is not going to last the next 5 or 10 years. They'll get you eventually. It always becomes a drag. It's hard to make water less wet.

  48. this is a non-issue, afaik by MoNsTeR · · Score: 4, Informative

    If "SDMI Compliant" means "can't copy from player to PC", then this is a 100% non-issue. Even the original Rio 300 (which I have) doesn't let you do this. Furthermore, I can't really think of a reason you'd *want* to. Why would I want to move only 64MB of mp3's over a slow-ass parallel port connection, when I can download all 6GB of my mp3's from home at 128Kbps? Or just burn some favorites to a CD and bring that to work?

    The only way player-to-PC-copy would be really useful is if you had a hard-drive player, and I believe some of them (Archos Jukebox?) can do that.

    OTOH, if "SDMI Compliant" means something else, then it might be a bigger problem. But if the thing plays standard MP3's, I don't see how there's much to worry about, as there's no way to "trust" an mp3, and thus no way to restrict the player, IF in fact it plays standard files.

    1. Re:this is a non-issue, afaik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even the original Rio 300 (which I have) doesn't let you do this.

      Are you sure? The Rio software doesn't support it, but the hardware does (at least for certain models). There is unofficial software to copy from Rio to PC (I think the Rio programs for Linux allow you to do this).

    2. Re:this is a non-issue, afaik by CaptJay · · Score: 2

      Here in Canada, the government has this silly idea that you are within your right to make a copy for your personal use of a music/video that someone lends to you. So suppose I go to a friend's house and hear music I like, I could use my portable player to bring it back to my house, making a perfectly legal (in Canada), personal use copy for myself.

      So what we have is a company deciding I'm not allowed to do that, because they say I'm not. Now tell me, why would I encourage that company? I put my money where my mouth is, and I will not buy such a product. This is the reason why I will not buy any SDMI-compliant portable player.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    3. Re:this is a non-issue, afaik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If you're willing to allow devices that you purchase to be "SDMI Compliant", than you shall soon not be able to copy an MP3 file from one of the hard drives in your PC to another hard drive in your PC.

      It's not an non-issue. Do NOT buy "SDMI Compliant" devices.

    4. Re:this is a non-issue, afaik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Functionality.

      If I buy a RIO I buy it to play mp3's

      If I realise it can transfer *any* file backwards and forwards I have a storage device

      I have a solid state 'better than a zip drive' device for cheaper than a zip drive

      If it's SDMI compliant it does one job only. Play mp3 and I can only upload.

      Still a non-issue ?

      Oh hold on! SDMI is Secure digital MUSIC initiative
      OK then I can play my files how many times ? and I can't transfer them to where else ?

      It's my music damnit! I bought it! stop giving me less options/control.

      NO SDMI!

    5. Re:this is a non-issue, afaik by gig · · Score: 2

      You still pay in Canada, though. The other part of the law that says you can make a copy of a friend's stuff is a tax on blank media and recording devices that you use to do it. A Canadian musician who buys equipment and CD-R's to store his own music is paying money to the record companies just as if he were storing somebody else's songs.

  49. Creative Nomand + SmartMedia Card Reader by Sylistron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a usb card reader that allows a SmartMedia to be used as a file system. I copy the files onto that card and slide the card into the nomad. I use the card reader for my camera as well. It's a great solution.

  50. Neo 25 / Genica Roopaq / Neo Jukebox by docstrange · · Score: 1

    I have a Genica roopaq (originally neo 25)with a 20 gig hard drive plugged into the input on my cd player and it works great. I used a cell phone clip on the back, and mounted it on the dashboard. If you want the newer relative to the neo25/roopaq line you can go with the neo jukebox Which is basically a better version of the roopaq / neo 25. The best part is that under 2000 and XP i didn't even need to load drivers. I plugged it into the usb port and it recognized the scanlogic usb2ide controller and mounted it as an external usb hard drive. To copy songs, just drag and drop. With the latest scanlogic firmware i've read linux success stories for using this device with linux as well. (works with macos too, but if you have a mac, you probably have a ipod) The only complaint I have is that it took a little more than 2 hours to copy my 20 gigs of mp3s over usb.

    --
    Remember that you are unique, just like everybody else.
    1. Re:Neo 25 / Genica Roopaq / Neo Jukebox by docstrange · · Score: 1

      One feature I forgot to mention of this device is the ability to store ANY type of file on it. It's basically a portable laptop hard drive enclosure with a big LCD, and mp3 decoder. =)

      --
      Remember that you are unique, just like everybody else.
  51. Seconded and amended - try the jukebox recorder! by isaac · · Score: 5, Informative

    I agree with the parent that Archos seems to have the best MP3 devices at the moment. In particular, though, I would recommend staying away from their cheaper "Jukebox 6000" and "Studio 20" products, in favor of their "Jukebox Recorder" machine.

    Highlights of this thing?
    - Works great on any OS that supports USB storage devices; when attached, mounts like any other USB hard disk. Will store anything you put on there.
    - Hackable; will take any 9.5mm 2.5" laptop hard disk. I replaced the stock 6 GB disk with a 20 GB mechanism without any problems.
    - Unlike the cheaper models, the Recorder (which goes for around $300-$350 these days) does real-time MP3 recording from analog line-in, digital SPDIF, or an onboard mic!
    - Digital in doubles as digital out when not recording.
    - The Recorder has a MUCH, MUCH BETTER interface than the cheaper jukeboxes, with an 8-line screen that during playback shows ID3 info (or directory info if file is untagged), elapsed/remaining/total time, left and right VU meters, and labels for the three soft-button function keys.
    - Also, the recorder has greatly superior sound compared to the cheaper jukeboxes, with base/treble/loudness/balance adjustments and plenty of volume.

    And of course, no SDMI anywhere in sight. The iPod looks nicer, and firewire is cool, but with a 20 gig disk in mine, I've got 4x the capacity of an iPod in a package not much bigger, with digital i/o and real-time mp3 recording abilities. Oh yeah, 10-hour battery life, too, using standard replacable NiMH AA cells.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  52. do moderators even read the articles? by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    The Rio Volt 250 is a CD based player so the SDMI thing doesn't really apply

    nuff said...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:do moderators even read the articles? by cetan · · Score: 1

      The current round of moderation (stretching as far back as this summer) is clearly designed to undermine /. moderation. Very valid posts are getting modded into bizzare places.

      I just got back into metamoderation because of this.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:do moderators even read the articles? by jafac · · Score: 2

      I have a Rio Volt, and it's pretty nice. Skipping is nearly non-existant, it's buffered all the way to timbuktu.

      However, if you find yourself changing mp3 cd's often, this player has a weakness. When you change cd's the thing powers off - and powering it back on, you'd think it's running Windows CE or something, because it takes a good two minutes before it boots, reads the CD index, and starts playing music. It's very slow, so instead of playing your favorite 5 tunes from one cd, then your favorite 3 from another, and favorite 6 from another, it's best to just make a single compilation disk of those 14 songs. Otherwise you do a LOT of waiting for the thing to spin up.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    3. Re:do moderators even read the articles? by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      Actually I just turned on my riovolt 250, and it was less than 15 seconds before it was up and playing a VBR mp3. I don't know what kind of directory structure you use, I just throw everything on the root.

    4. Re:do moderators even read the articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, with my Rio, just put all the MP3s in one directory, completely unsorted, and if you have any sorting you want done, do it with individual playlists-- also in the root directory. without directories, it scans much faster (like fifteen seconds) and the playlists are easier to use then directories. winamp/xmms' .m3us are supported by the 250 and on the middle-end model with the latest update.

      schmoko.

  53. 2 players by mikescuba · · Score: 1

    First is this one http://www.genica.com/MP3products/Mp3-roopaq.htm it's generic & uses a laptop HDD so it's gonna eat batteries. But since it says it can be used as a USB HDD I don't belive there'd be any SDMI problems. Second is the cheap one, though it sounds fine. I've got one & it's kinda clunky but for $35 & MMC memory who cares. BTW it says it only accepts sandisk MMC cards & they mean it. http://www.jamonline.com/products/jamp3_specs.asp Enjoy, also I got mine form www.compgeeks.com

  54. Emmerson Research by re-Verse · · Score: 1

    I have last years model of the Emmerson Research MP3/CD player.

    As far as i know, there is no protection on it whatseover.

    1. Re:Emmerson Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought one from Kmart. It has too many dropouts and only gets a couple of hours of play from Li rechargeables. I'm bringing it back.

      Funny thing, all the chain stores used to have MP3 CD players a few weeks ago, now they're gone and I'm told they won't be restocked. Go figure.

  55. Get the Rio Volt.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got the Rio Volt. Got it back when it was new. Initially it was great. No worries about where the MP3's came from or anything, just encode, burn and listen. I've been using a VBR scheme from the beginning for all my personal mp3's and never had an issue with timing or playback.

    The software upgrades have improved things considerably in usability and have introduced no downsides.

    One of the best things about this player, is it's excessively long skip protection. 120 seconds claimed. The way it does this is it spins down the CD during playback. It has a large enough buffer to read in part of or the entire song. Once it has the data in RAM, the CD spins down. Now there is nothing to skip. It spins back up for the next bit of data and then spins down again. Works seemlessly. It'd be cool to see an in car CD player use this. The CD spin down also translates into very long battery lifes.

    The use of CD media means I can fit as much as 12 CDs on one CD of mp3s.

    Wonderful player.

  56. Offtopic? WTF? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Seriously, are moderators smoking crack nowadays or what? How MORE ON-TOPIC can this post get???

    1. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      are moderators smoking crack nowadays

      NOWDAYS????
      What!?! I thought that *was* the requirement for moderating...

  57. Head to eBay and pick up a.... by Lawmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nomad v1 mp3 player and a few 32mb flash memory cards. It holds a total of 64MB and is completely SDMI free. With the replacable memory cards, you can have different genres of music for driving/working out etc.

    Additional features are an FM tuner and a voice recorder.

    Here's the link.

    And of course since they are a couple years old, you can pick them up cheap!

    1. Re:Head to eBay and pick up a.... by onion2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      you can have different genres of music for driving/working out etc

      Working out? You realise this is slashdot, right?

    2. Re:Head to eBay and pick up a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a NomadII. Here is a short page on things I love and hate about it, plus a look inside...

      http://paranoic.com/nomad/index.html

  58. I went for a DIVA by BeBoxer · · Score: 2

    Take a look at Diva. Somewhere on their page it says it's "SDMI capable", but there aren't any handicaps in the current player. I think a lot of companies say they are "SDMI capable" when in reality, SDMI will only matter with SDMIv2. And that has a low chance of ever becoming reality, especially after the watermarking techniques it was to rely on were shown to be nearly worthless.

    The Diva has three main advantages: It's cheap. I got a 128MB version for ~$130. It uses CF memory, which IMHO is about the most standard of the various flash formats. Most importanty, it's a generic USB mass storage device. I just plug it into my laptop and mount /dev/sda1. I can copy files in and out to my hearts content. It just ignores any file that doesn't end in .mp3. No drivers to install. No special software. No mess. No fuss.

    The downsides are that it's rather cheaply made, and the display/controls are a little lacking. But hey, you get what you pay for. The 32MB version can be had for like $70 after rebate. For me, the security of knowing that I would have no driver issues at all outweighed the disadvantages. Oh, it has a voice recording mode too, for what it's worth. I got the MP3128VP, but it looks like they have a new "Music Pen" version coming out. It should work just as well in Linux. The Specs brag about "No drivers with Windows2000/ME" which means it should work fine in any OS with USB mass store drivers.

  59. FrontierLabs Nex II by zerosignal · · Score: 1

    http://www.frontierlabs.com

    Fantastic little player from Hong Kong - uses CompactFlash, so you can just treat is as a removable drive. No SDMI crap.

  60. Iomega HipZip by vsync64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm pleased with my HipZip. Cost me ~$150, and for another $99 you can get the car accessory pack, which includes, among other things, a car charger, cassette adapter, and 4 extra disks. I think you can also get this stuff in a giant combo pack which is cheaper.

    The player itself is of good quality; it sounds great both on headphones and plugged into my car stereo. It includes an equalizer and a backlit display. Unfortunately, the OS itself is a bit spartan; there's no way to save the playlist through a power cycle, and the random play function resets itself on every powerup. I suspect these issues may be resolved with a newer version of Dadio, and for now I just randomize the playlist before loading it onto the player, as tracks are sorted in load order.

    There are several interesting features of this player. The first is that it takes Iomega's 40MB Clik! (now Pocket Zip) disks, which run about $10 each retail. It acts as an ordinary USB mass storage device, which means you can copy any files to/from it without restriction, and also use it to exchange ordinary data files. (Unfortunately, as always with Win98, you can't just plug in the player and copy files; you have to install the drivers first, despite its being a perfectly generic USB disk drive. Completely plug-and-play in Linux, though.)

    The 40MB size of the Clik! disks is a little annoying, but the ability to carry 5 or 6 of the disks around in the media wallet without significant expense makes up for that, and I'm able to store much more music (with the hassle of changing disks) than I was with my Rio 500 expanded to 128MB. Additionally (and this is the reason I bought the player), it will support Ogg Vorbis as soon as the format reaches 1.0. (There is a beta firmware that supports it now, but it won't play files encoded with >beta4.) Ogg Vorbis will let me easily degrade bitrates without re-encoding, and at 96kb/s .ogg I will be able to store quite a bit on 1 disk.

    One interesting problem: When hooked to the line-in of my car CD player, there is an audible hiss if I have it simultaneously plugged into the charger. As soon as I disconnect it from the charger, it disappears. I don't know if I wired the stereo strangely or what, because it's not there with headphones. Weird.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    1. Re:Iomega HipZip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several interesting features of this player. The first is that it takes Iomega's 40MB Clik! (now Pocket Zip) disks, which run about $10 each retail.

      Somehow I don't like Iomega disks that say Clik!...

  61. VHS - PAL vs NTSC? by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I moved from Ireland to the US and have to re-buy all the movies I bought because I can't play them on American VCRs. Is that fair?

    1. Re:VHS - PAL vs NTSC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wouldn't it be less expensive to bring in a NTSC VCR if you have an extensive collection? Or better yet, MPEG 'em up and put 'em on Usenet for the rest of us?

      ~~~

    2. Re:VHS - PAL vs NTSC? by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Just buy a PAL player.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  62. The enemy controls the hardware by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This shows the real problem we are in for: the enemy controls the hardware. We can always make our own software solutions, but as long as making hardware requires large scale investments we can be sure that it will be under their control. Hardware MP3 players are not the only place where you can see this, another example are the new CDs which cannot be read correctly by CD-ROMs - making a CD drive that ignores the broken error correction codes would be completely possible, but as futile as laws like the DMCA are against us, as well they seem to work (if they are even necessary) against hardware makers.

    This is why having hardware specific for each task, which is often discussed as something good, must be something we cannot allow to happen. Instead, we have to continue to ensure the existance of systems like PCs where things are done in software, which WE can control. We even have to look into moving more PC functionality into software, now that we have processors strong enough for it, as I worry that things like graphic accelerators and sound cards will be future platforms for entertainment industry UHT (User Hostile Technology). The more that is done in software, the more freedom is had by all.

    In the short term, it might still be possible to find dedicated MP3 players that are not UHT (such as the burned CD ones), but in the longer term I think handhelds with strong general purpose CPUs running Linux (preferably decoding OGG of course) is the only real choice. In the longest term, there is a real risk (see for example the "SS"SCA), that general purpose programmable hardware will simply not be allowed, and we will have to hope that an illegal underground market for hardware that is not user hostile will appear...

    1. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're absolutely right, and make an excellent point. I do, however, have a lot of faith in people to re-engineer hardware to break through the barriers placed in the way of functionality.

      Back when they proclaimed it illegal to sell police scanners that let you listen to cell-phone frequencies in the 800Mhz range, people came out with a slew of modifications to re-enable the missing frequencies.

      When they sold the Playstation so it wouldn't run copies of game CDs, they released hacked chips to solder in the unit and fix the problem.

      When Apex was forced to quit selling DVD players with the "loophole menu" in them to disable Macrovision and region codes, hackers created custom firmware to flash into them to restore these capabilities.

      As long as individuals remain interested in the inner workings of hardware, control will always be regained from the industry. Keeping control in software just means a larger percentage of the population has the knowledge and ability to make the changes needed.

    2. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by FeatherBoa · · Score: 1

      You can control the hardware, if you want. The oldest home-brew MP3 player I know is this one: http://elm-chan.org/reports/mpc/report_e.html but there are lots more listed here: http://ee.cleversoul.com/mp3_projects.html

    3. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by KjetilK · · Score: 2
      You make excellent points!

      It is therefore extremely important that those of us who understand what is going on, do not buy any hardware from manufacturers producing UHT. I'm compiling a boycott list, it now includes BSA members, those who voted yes to CPRM, those who use firmware that doesn't allow zonefreeing of DVDs, etc.

      Yeah, and this is the reason why I didn't buy a DVD player at all for my new computer. That the firmware can be upgraded and zone-checking can be removed is all fine, but I'm not going to buy a player unless the manufacturer gets the point: I'm not going to buy UHT.

      This is the message we have to send, and we have to make it clear that whoever sells UHT is loosing customers. That's the only language they will understand.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    4. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by Myself · · Score: 2

      Have you looked at the Terapin Mine? It looks like a general-purpose device if I've ever seen one!

    5. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how much it will cost the hardware makers if they screw up on the hardware implementation? It ain't "reflash the BIOS" (otherwise we could change the BIOS.), it's "recall" to pull the chips and install new ones. This means one single mistake will cost them billions. Ask Intel about thier experience. Not to mention the high cost of making special hardwired chips as opposed to using programmable chips.

      It will be really really silly for a manufacturer to care THAT much about SDMI, unless if they are big record companies themselves, like SONY. History has shown that SONY simply cannot control the market single handedly.

      I predict that the most we'd have to do to crack a device wide open is updating the firmware. (which we can modify.)

      If all else fails, we still have the radio shack, right?

    6. Re:The enemy controls the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... amen.

  63. iPaq by mfos.org · · Score: 1

    My personal suggestion would be an iPaq running Linux, with a 1gig microdrive. I use the 3650 myself. Funny how there's no SDMI compliant software for Linux.

  64. Neo Jukebox by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    Check out the Neo Jukebox from IOMagic:

    http://www.iomagic.com/products/neo-index.htm

    20GB of storage, with no SDMI at all (at least, not on mine); plus, it connects like a plain old USB hard drive, so you can copy any stuff you want to and from it, not just MP3s. Better yet, the hard drive is easily swapped, and doing so doesn't void the warranty. Only drawback is that early models have been slightly flakey (mine had to go back for repairs), but they *seem* to be ironing out those issues.

    Now if only they'd make one with a Firewire connection, like the iPod...

    (Note to iPod fans: I love all the specs except for hard drive size; 20GB is my *minimum* acceptable size for a portable player.)

  65. $129 at easybuy by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Good price on it here. Check out their other MP3 players too, some good deals.

  66. Mod parent up by sulli · · Score: 1

    The iPod file access utility sounds very useful - I just dl'd it. Everyone with iPod needs to read this.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  67. Sssh.... Secret about Creative Labs SDMI support by Dan+Nolan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've owned a Nomad Jukebox for almost a year. When I first bought it, the firmware would not allow you to copy files from the device to you computer. But as soon as the first firmware upgrade was release, it did away with this. It claims to have support for SDMI, but only on files the are encoded in particular formats with particular digital rights management software. Mp3s are safe.

    In fact, the latest firmware upgrade now allows you to move any type of file onto the Nomad and back, so you can use it as a portable harddrive!

    (Let's keep Creative Labs lack of SDMI enforcement just between us. We wouldn't want certain powerful industry lobby groups *cough-RIAA* to come down on them.)

  68. Pocket PC's Work Great by iansmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been using a Jornada 540 series Pocket PC for a year now as an MP3 player, and recently upgraded to the 568.

    I get 12 hours of battery life playing MP3's and you can purchace 512 megabyte CF cards for it. Makes an *awesome* player, and can do videos as well as all the PDA stuff.

    A bit expensive, but a neat toy.

    --
    Ian

  69. Consider getting a MiniDisc recorder/player by ziffie · · Score: 5, Informative
    MiniDisc players are a viable alternative to portable mp3 players. The ATRAC compression technology has reached a point where you can store 80/160/320 minutes on a single 80 minute minidisc.

    The units themselves are tiny (most of them are in the 80x16x75mm range) and weigh almost nothing (the Sharp MD-MT770 weighs 128g). The discs are infinitely re-recordable and cost about $1.50 each.

    Depending on the level of compression you record at, shock protection can be up to 160 seconds. Most units have rechargeable batteries and can also use an extra AA for backup yielding incredible battery life -- the MT770 for example can play up to 49 hours on the highest compression level (35 on the regular SP mode).

    One of the coolest advantages they have over mp3 players is that you can record concerts at virtually CD quality sound. Plug a microphone into the in-jack and you can bootleg with ease. Most of the latest recorders feature manually adjustable recording levels (while recording!), automatic 3/5/10 minute timestamping, audio syncing and optical line-in (which means you can optically record mp3s from a computer equipped with optical-out). Some of the Sony recorders (MZ-R700DPC for example) ship with external D/A converter that connects the MD's digital input with your computer's USB port, which makes recording all internet audio formats quite easy.

    You can shuffle tracks around on a disc on the fly, delete them, insert new ones and of course there are the usual random/repeat play modes.

    You can get an entry-level MDLP (2x/4x recording) player/recorder for around $215. Compared to paying $90 for each 256mb flashcard, they are really cost efficient.

    I have a Sharp MD-MT77 which I am quite happy with. I make 5 hour playlists in xmms, plug the recorder into my soundcard's line-out and make mix MDs. 5 hours is a lot of space to work with -- and the quality is quite decent. At 2x (160 minutes), recordings sound virtually like CD quality.

    Check out minidisc.org for more information, or minidisco.com for a run-down on most of the available models.

    --

    ---
    "Colors blind the eye
    Desires wither the heart."
    -- Lao Tsu, "Tao Te Ching"
    1. Re:Consider getting a MiniDisc recorder/player by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      What about having each mp3 as a different track on the mini disc? Do you have to manually stop and start each track, or will it do it automatically? Just curious - I'm seriously interested in getting one (or an iPod), and I'd like to know more about how you do it (since my main box is Linux and I assume that yours is UNIX, since you mentioned XMMS). Knowing would be great.

      Thanks

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    2. Re:Consider getting a MiniDisc recorder/player by lizrd · · Score: 2
      There's a setting in XMMS (Options tab of the Preferences dialog) to enable a pause between tracks. If you set this to 2-3 seconds, most minidisc recorders will notice the silence and insert a track mark automagically. The exact length you need to set it to will vary based on the model of MD recorder and sound card you have. Spending a few minutes experimenting with it should be enough to get it working properly.

      The real drawback to minidiscs is that most recording must be done in realtime. The offset of this is that it really only needs to be done once because the media is so cheap and portable. I generally don't do much recording from my computer to minidisc since I got my minidisc/CD combo deck for my home stereo. With one of these deals I can make a digital copy of a CD at 4X, which makes the process pretty painless.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    3. Re:Consider getting a MiniDisc recorder/player by gidds · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Seconded. Though I'm a Mac user, and find the iPod extremely appealing, I'll be sticking with my MDs for now, due to:
      • Capacity. My CD collection is just about into four figures, and I dread to think how much CF or HD space that'd take up even with lousy quality, let along the high quality I'm used to with MD.
      • Speed. When I'm late for work I can grab an MD from the shelf in seconds. Even with FireWire transfers, loading up an MP3 player wouldn't come close to that.
      • Portability. I've an MD deck, a portable recorder I use for listening on the way to work and for (legal!) recording of concerts, and a player in my car, and I can easily transfer music between them all, which I would currently find hard with MP3.

      I look forward to a time when these issues are sorted out, and of course they're not problems for everyone, but for now and for me MDs are by far the best solution.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    4. Re:Consider getting a MiniDisc recorder/player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...optically record mp3s from a computer equipped with optical-out... ...5 hours is a lot of space to work with...

      Does this mean that it takes 5 hours to transfer 5 hours of music from PC to MD?

  70. Nomad II? by seebs · · Score: 2

    So far as I know, the Nomad II lets you copy files as plain old MP3's. The driver software they provide for Mac won't let me copy things back from it, but that's no big deal.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Nomad II? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Actually it will. There's a trick that works for Windows too, that will let you upload your music from the Nomad II to the desktop (which, since this whole discussion has drifted off-topic, was one of the requirements of the original poster). The only catch is that you can't actually *listen* to it if you want to be able to transfer it.

      Just change the three-letter extension on the filename from ".mp3" to ".txt" and you can upload and download at will. The Nomad won't recognize it as an mp3 file, so it won't be copy-restricted. when you get it back on your peecee, change the extension back (Mac users know how to do the file type/creator magic).

      And if you really want to be able to listen to it, you can have both "Enter_Sandman.mp3" and "Enter_Sandman.txt" right next to each other.

    2. Re:Nomad II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can copy in and out any file you want.
      I am using Linux for that.
      The only problem is that with firmware 3.0beta
      for Nomad II corrupts the files so the file
      you copy in and out differs.

  71. SDMI == Bullying, Fear of Lawsuits? by Hobart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember that the first portable MP3 player, the Diamond Rio PMP300, (first announced in September 1998) was entangled in nasty lawsuits, as covered in this slashdot article from 1998.

    I daresay these nasty lawsuits contributed to Diamond's demise. None of the consumer electronics companies want to spend the cash battling the recording industry in court, so every one of them toe the line. I'm sure the recording industry has pounded the crap out of several small companies who've tried it -- and when Ogg Vorbis is finalized I'm sure the recording industry will try to pound the crap out of anyone making hardware Vorbis players as "Piracy Devices"

    The closest thing I've seen is the Apple Ipod which lets you either store music for listening to, or store files for moving to another PC, but not to listen to the files marked for moving to another PC as far as I know ...

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
    1. Re:SDMI == Bullying, Fear of Lawsuits? by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      I understand Diamond won the lawsuit and the Rio was affirmed as a legal device. I don't think consumer electronics companies need to worry about battling the recording industry over MP3 players. Granted the RIAA could try to force SDMI compliance but then, where exactly is SDMI these days? Last I heard the group was essentially splintered because of different priorities from the RIAA side and the electronics side.

  72. Personal Jukebox by haslup · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PJB is available with up to a 30 gig hard drive and connects via USB... I've got the 20 gig and it's great. Plus, linux support through the OpenPJB Sourceforge project that even includes an emacs mode.

    jason

  73. PJB-100 (Personal Jukebox) by Zed+Pobre · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although the initial advertising claimed otherwise, with the more recent firmwares (2.3.x, the one I have currently is 2.3.2) DO in fact support transferring data from the device back to the hard disk. There is a FAQ that has links to the various places which have software that can do this -- one of which is a SourceForge Project.

    The PJB itself is a fairly nifty device (though the main website tends to get either broken out outdated from time to time -- and the pictures they have of the products are in some cases DEAD WRONG! The only colors that are really available as shown are the titanium with black buttons and the all black; the blue one is actually kind of an off teal with dark teal buttons) -- storage capacities range from 6GB to 30GB, making the high-end model the largest capacity wearable MP3 player that I know about.

    There are Linux synchronization tools available, but they were all unfortunately in a more or less half-finished state the last time I checked, so I still rip under Linux and then boot back to Windows to transfer the MP3 files to the PJB. It also has the downside of being USB rather than firewire, so transferring large amounts of data can take a while. Battery life is around 10 hours with the rechargeable LI battery. Recharging can only be done in the main device though -- no external chargers are aviailable. It also makes a loud tone when the battery is getting low, and will make the tone again after a few seconds of playing if you stop and then start the device again, which can be somewhat disconcerting if you weren't expecting it, especially since it triggers when there's still an hour or two of life left in the device. It is documented in the manual, but was easy to overlook or forget.

    The navigation buttons are fairly easy to use and simple to understand. I've had one problem with an mp3 that had a click in it that wasn't present when played on the PC, but it was an isolated case, and was one of my oldest rips, so it might be a genuine glitch in the encoding.

    Well, this turned into more of a full review than a comment on another device that can do two-way transfers, so I should probably shut up now. I will add a final note that I had problems when trying to reach the company directly or order directly from their website, so I ended up buying from MP3FactoryDirect and quite satisfied with that.

  74. Word of Caution with Repairs by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    If you have a non-SDMI player and it breaks and you send it in on warranty, you might get a replacement or repair with SDMI.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  75. Easy solution... by amattie · · Score: 1

    Just buy one of those nifty MP3 CD players (like the one mentioned in the article) and one of these for copying those songs from your friends computer and then copying them back to your computer. No protection at all since its just a really mini keychain USB hard drive.

  76. original rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i loved my original rio(32MB+dual 16MB flash chips). i got the original one almost 3 years ago. i just bought a refurb model from buy.com about a week ago for $60. great little device. i don't mind the small memory, i wanted to be sure it was fully linux compadible(and it is), didn't require anything special in the system to use it with(i.e. USB or some 3rd party driver), was solid state(less chance of damage due to shock), could fit in a shirt pocket..rio fits all that. and its cheap. my other rio works just fine, except i dropped it a couple years ago and damaged the battery seal so if im not careful the battery can pop out. thats the main reason i got the refurb one.

  77. unConfusing the issue: by Jetifi · · Score: 1

    SDMI is about water-marking, and MP3 players (and memory sticks, etc.) refusing to do certain things with SDMI-watermarked music.

    The reason that it's difficult to find MP3 players that will cat mp3 > hd[a-z] is the court case between Rio (one of the first MP3 player manufacturers) and the RIAA.

    The RIAA alleged that because the Rio allowed you to copy music from PC to PC via the flash, it was guilty of contributory copyright infringement (or something).

    Rio (IIRC) either lost the case, or settled out of court to not allow player > HD shifting of mp3s. Most of the other manufacturers took this as a warning sign, and now they don't allow player>HD copying either.

    If you're interested in an HD-based player, this "Personal MP3 Jukebox" comes in 10, 20 and (I think) 30 gig models, <gloat>they have fantastic sound, open API's, easter-eggs(minesweeper :-) in the firmware and I haven't had any problems with mine</gloat>, other than the fact that it looks like it was made in Russia.

    I think the firmware supports uploading of MP3's, but it's only actually implimented in un-official software (pjbExploder, I think), which is functional enough - in windows.

    Your choice, monkey :-)

    1. Re:unConfusing the issue: by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      The RIAA lost RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia. You do not RecallCorrectly, so shut up. Go to www.eff.org (no hrefs, you've already been too lazy), put in RIAA & Diamond and a treasure trove of real information will come out. Imagine that.

      Diamond & others got scared of being classified under the AHRA as home recording devices so until the Archos Recorder, none have had good quality recording- only voice-in.

      -M

    2. Re:unConfusing the issue: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, chill!

      OK so yeah, my bad. Now since you obviously know your legal shit, why didn't you reply to the article, instead of just swatting other users' posts?

      Even if they deserved it :-)

  78. Archos Jukebox and Nomad Jukebox by Tony · · Score: 1

    I purchased the Archos Jukebox from Think Geek. Cool looking gadget; but it didn't turn on. I got an "I2C Error" from the get-go.

    So, I went down to Best Buy and picked up another one. This one turned on and worked fine; I could transfer files over, and it was a pleasure to use. The sound was a bit muddy, but not too bad.

    But, any time I pushed a specific button, the entire machine shut down. There was a "soft spot" around the button that, when *very* slight pressure was applied, caused the logic end to shut down, and the hard drive to spin up. Obviously, there was some sort of short happening. Within the day, the machine would not turn on, and the hard drive would not spin down.

    I reluctantly purchased a Nomad Jukebox (6G instead of 20G-- damn!). There are some libraries for Linux. And, you *can* transfer tracks back from the unit. However, there is a flag that may be set to "play-only." This is true for all the pre-loaded music (most of which is not very good). However, all the music I uploaded to the device can be downloaded back to my computer. Granted, I have only transferred music I've ripped from my own CDs.

    In addition, the Nomad Jukebox has *excellent* sound. I'm not sure I could deal with an Archos now that I've heard what it *can* sound like.

    I have to defend Rio and Creative and all the other "SDMI-Ready" manufacturers. They watched as both Napster and mp3.com got smacked down hard. They can't afford to go against the music industry. I can't blame them for caving. I wish they had the brass balls to stand up to the schoolyard bully, but it ain't gonna happen soon.

    Anyway, that's my take, from a practical and philosophical standpoint.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  79. Rio Volt by cruelworld · · Score: 2

    I have the Rio Volt and am semi-happy with it.

    Two main problems;
    1) The thing is a battery hog. I dont know what they claim but you wont get more than a couple hours per pair of AA's.

    2) The anti-skip sucks. Really, really sucks. I can make it skip by putting it in my leg pocket (cargo pants) and walking. So dont plan to do any jogging with it or anything.

    Other than that, the sound quality is good. The controls are simple but effective. You upgrade the firmware by burning the upgrade software onto a blank CD and then play that CD - so it's pretty easy to upgrade and Linux friendly.

  80. What about MiniDisc? by adamfive · · Score: 1

    I just bought a MiniDisc player instead of an MP3 player and I couldn't be happier. I could go on and on about how it is superior to every MP3 player I looked at, but there's plenty of info out there already. The best part is that I don't have to worry about how much memory it has, the discs are only $2 and hold 150 minutes of music with compression, 75 without.

  81. How about Microboss MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a small company called Microboss that makes a wide range of MP3 players, generally quite cheap and without any copy protection junk.

    Check out http://www.microboss.de/mp3/mp3_english/default_e. htm if you are interested.

  82. Philips Expanium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Philips also has the Expanium which can read ISO/Joliet/UDF discs and play MP3 and AAC. Using UDF (DirectCD) you can drag and drop files onto the CD and not have to burn an entire CD at once without closing the session and such.

    here is a line-up of the products including the new tiny 8cm player which plays 8cm discs which you can create in any CDR/CDRW drive.

    some have remote controls and come with car adapters and such and some have text displays and others just numbers. it's a full line-up of decent CD Players and the best part is that AAC is supported for much higher quality smaller file size files.

  83. Why not build your own? by Gigs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.pjrc.com/tech/mp3/

    Links to site on building your own custom built in hardware player. Check out the links to the other sites too.

  84. Umm that is called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    music pirating unless it the tune is public domain

  85. Re:Minijam might not be your best bet by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 1

    Althought the price has fortunately come down on the Minijam, support is less than stellar for new operating systems. In fact, Innogear originally said they had no plans to support WinXP or Mac OS X. Looking at their FAQ I see they now say they're "exploring" XP and OS X support for "early 2002".

    Given that Innogear still hasn't implemented the originally promised functionality to read e-books and other files directly from the Minijam's memory, I'm skeptical that they'll get around to it that soon.

    Plus, the Minijam uses MMC cards with a proprietary format, so you wouldn't be able to pop your MMC card into any old desktop adapter and pull your MP3's off that way (or put new ones on).

    Early Visor adopters may remember Innogear as the company that boldly announced the SixPack module early on, which was supposedly going to provide six features like a 56kmodem, 8 megs of flash memory, vibrating alarm, voice recorder, etc. They claimed it would cost $199 and that it would be available Q1 2000.

    After pushing that release date back for the better part of a year, they announced the cancellation of the project. I've never bought any Innogear products, as much as I'd like an MP3 player for my Visor, because I don't trust the company to provide me with adequate support for the damn thing.

    The SoundsGood MP3 player springboard seemed to be well received, but it has been discontued and didn't use external memory.

    You'll find all kinds of consumer opinion about the Minijam at this site.

    -Andy

    P.S. You might want to check out the Sony Clie PEG-N760c for PDA/MP3 Capability. Sony seems poised to kick Handspring's ass.

  86. Archos Jukebox! by truedis · · Score: 1

    Archos Jukebox all the way!

    http://www.archos.com

  87. Rio Car by sheetzam · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the best answer to what to use in the car is the Rio Car: http://store.sonicblue.com/dr/v2/ec_MAIN.Entry10?S P=10024&PN=16&V1=39400&xid=25971&DSP=&CUR=840&PGRP =0&CACHE_ID=0.
    I say unfortunately because it is no longer being made, though you can still buy it.
    For those unfamiliar with its history, it was formerly known as the Empeg.
    It is quite possible the best and coolest mp3 player there ever was or will be. And yes, you can use it in the home, car, friend's stereo, wherever you can hook up to 12vdc or house current.

    --
    "Actually, I enjoyed this in the same vague, horrible way I enjoyed the A-Team" P. Opus
  88. Rio Volt by freakinPsycho · · Score: 1

    I bought a Rio Volt SP 100 not long ago and I love it. Here's the pros and cons as far as I can see:

    Pros:
    Plays several media types
    Plays songs off of several file system types
    Understands folders, subfolders and playlists
    Several nice options (repeat 1, repeat all, repeat directory, etc.)
    Fairly cheap (~$150 at Radio Shack)
    Decent battery life
    Flashable ROM for updates
    Backlit display (can be turned off)
    Easy navigation of files

    Cons:
    Skip protection leaves a bit to be desired
    Annoying dancing people at the bottom of the display
    Only plays mp3s with a bitrate up to 128 (I believe)

    I've been pretty happy with it overall. Cheap, works well, no anti-piracy stuff (though it comes with the software, it's not necessary). The fact that it also plays cds is convenient as well.

    I have another mp3 player that is put out by Sony, but had no real luck with it. The anti-piracy protection was annoying, custom format of music, small capacity, short life on expensive battery. About the only good thing about it was it was so small (about the size of a business card).

    --
    "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
    - Alexandar Woolcot
  89. easybuy2000 by (startx) · · Score: 1

    check out easybuy2000.com, they've got some really cool cd-based mp3 players for $100. I got mine for $70 and couldn't be happier with it.

  90. JazzPiper by TheCrunch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got a JazzPiper MVR64P. The capacity is better than average and it's SDMI-free.

    64MB Built-in,
    Takes up-to 32MB SmartMedia cards,
    Plays MP3/WAV,
    No SDMI,
    Crappy FM Radio,
    Voice Recording,
    Useless phone book thingy,
    Parallel interface,
    Dunno about non-win support,
    Looks nicer than most 1st gen players.

    I've seen it go under the name of MPIO-SV64. MP3Players.co.uk have a nice selection to look at.

    -TheCrunch

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
  91. That would be a disaster... (n/t) by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    ...

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  92. Skipping? by Bonker · · Score: 1

    Most of the portable CD and MP3-CD players I've seen recently read ahead almost a full minute. Mine works just fine if I carry it or leave it in my pocket, even while I'm jogging. If I work out at the gym, there's usually a notch or caddy on whatever aparatus I'm using that keeps me from even having to carry my own audio player while I exercise.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  93. rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had one of the old rio players. would hold like 8 songs. got it for $50. Someone stole it out of my car, which actually i found funny. piece of crap.

  94. iPod Unique Id by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

    Something to consider is that each iPod device has a unique identifier that's linked to the music database on it's "home" Macintosh.

    My speculation is that this may be used in the future in some sort of a system where you can purchase music and have it linked to a specific device... of course, as others have pointed out in other replies, Steve Jobs has said that piracy is a "social issue", not a technoligical issue.

  95. No theft involved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It is technically impossible to use the iPod to steal music: it just copies, and copying is not theft.

    1. Re:No theft involved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, perhaps it could be theft, if you used mv instead of cp...

    2. Re:No theft involved. by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 0

      One thought that about Napster, and look what happened to them...

    3. Re:No theft involved. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but copying intellectual property IS theft, as far as most courts are concerned.

  96. Cry Freedom by Coniine · · Score: 1

    It is only a matter of time before people begin reverse engineering these things. They probably all use standard ARM, MIPS and DSP processors. Open source versions will be available. As for the DMCA - fuck it with a pointed stick - it's bad law, overreaching and oppressive. Documents and code can be spread so quickly that the idea of stopping it is ludicrous. The reverse engineers at greatest risk are those who want credit for their work - so be humble for the moment.

    On a slightly divergent note, I saw that the Jim Carrey Grinch movie has made ~$143 million in the six days since its consumer release. Now I ask you, where is all of this piracy that the MPAA has been crying crocodile tears about? Just wait until Harry Potter is out on disc.

  97. What About by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Edigital's MXP100 player, which uses an IBM Microdrive and also boasts a voice recognition system to navigate through your MP3s. Looks like a nifty little unit. Though the IBM microdrive cards store less than an Ipod or some of the larger jukeboxes, I assume you can buy extras and plug them in and remove them from the unit as necessary.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  98. Re:iPod? Other good uses by alfredo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sneak into your brother's room and quickly download to his Mac, a gig of gay porn. Ain't FireWire great?

    Then tell mom that your brother has some nasty stuff on his computer.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  99. Hard to copy = illegal to copy by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

    It not always being "easy" to make fair use of things wasn't a great situation, but it was tolerable.

    The DMCA makes any fair use that isn't "easy" illegal, which makes the whole situation much worse.

    It is worse to the point of being intolerable - what good is fair use if it is illegal to make use of it if the copyright owner doesn't want you to - fair use is NOT a check on copyright owner's power if the copyright owner can make it illegal to exercise it - thus the balance between copyright and the First Amendment is GONE and the current law is unconstitutional.

    Judge Kaplan disregarded fair use protection clauses and exemptions written directly into the DMCA itself and found against the defendants (they were ordered to pay the court for the "privilege" of being persecuted by the court).

    So don't expect the Constitution to save you.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    1. Re:Hard to copy = illegal to copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      September 11, 2001. Never forget, never forgive

      September 11, 2001. Never forget, already forgiven.

  100. What's Wrong With Copy Protection by Marco+Krohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recommend very much the following article from John Gilmore (EFF, inventer of the alt hierarchy): "What's Wrong With Copy Protection".

    http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html

    The article is well written and he makes some good and interesting points. Worth a read IMHO.

  101. Aiwa and Kenwood head units by raygundan · · Score: 2

    I had the Aiwa CDC-MP3, and it skipped horribly. I had it replaced and reinstalled three times, but nothing they did could make the unit(s) stop skipping. The lack of an in-song resume was a down point, too. (so when you get back into your car it picks up where you left off instead of at the beginning of the song-- nasty for those 60 minute tracks!)

    I returned it altogether and replaced it with a Kenwood KDC MP-8017. Same basic specs and price as the Aiwa, with a less cheesy display and the ability to resume in the middle of an mp3. Additionally, although the Aiwa sounded fine to me at the time, the Kenwood definitely has a much more accurate sound.

    Missing from both is the ability to do random play across a whole disc. They only do random within a directory.

  102. That's cool but... by MattW · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine raves about his nomad (although bemoans a lack of belt clips). I was pondering getting one, but I have to ask: why should I buy one that has SDMI anything at all? I certainly don't want my music restricted. I really don't even want people to thinkthe players that are compliant are widespread, because I want mp3s, not some funky SDMI-encoded file.

  103. Various MPIO MP3 players by diabloii · · Score: 1
    From what I've read around the net and on their website, their players do not have SDMI support at all. These are supposedly the top selling players in Japan. Look here for more information.

    It's available for sale at the following sites:
    Innogear.com
    MP3 Factory Direct
    DGN Depot

    --
    ---- "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." --Henry David Thoreau(1817-1862)
  104. Re:If you're considering the Rio Volt, consider th by mattkime · · Score: 2

    the AVC Soul *IS* the RioVolt. The RioVolt also supports the .m3u files as well as CD-RWs. I believe they may be on slightly different firmware upgrade paths, but they are essentially the same. (Except for the $20 in price)

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  105. Nomad II 0MB corrupts files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi!

    I got Nomad II 0MB. It is very nice but one thing:
    the files you transfer to it and from it are different. In other words - it corrupts your files.
    Not always, not all but often enough to
    be frustrating.

    Kubus

    1. Re:Nomad II 0MB corrupts files by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      0 MB? Doesnt sound like it has much storage space...

    2. Re:Nomad II 0MB corrupts files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0MB means 0MB built-in. I bought it for $80
      at www.computers4sure.com. Then I bought
      128MB SmartMedia at www.newegg.com for $49.
      128MB is 2.5 hours of music at 128kbps.
      If you downsample to 96kbps you get over 3 hours.
      + FM tuner

  106. Tom tom tom mp3 tom tom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tom likes mp3zzzzzz and goatsezzzzz and mp3zzz la la la tom mod me down biotch tom tom tom

    1. Re:Tom tom tom mp3 tom tom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and lewis hes a flamer flame flame flame lewis liu of short hills new jersey lewis liu the anorexic basterd who sucks everything

  107. Get a NEX II by Iguru42 · · Score: 1

    I've been using a NEX II for over a year now. It doesn't use SDMI. It can use CF I or II type cards which means it can use a IBM microdrive. I use a 192MB CF I card. I like my music to sound good so I rip my tracks at 192kbps which gives me about 3 hours of play time, plenty for my purposes. One of these days I'll get a 1 gig microdrive so I can have the 10 hours or whatever it works out too.

  108. What about Ogg files? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do any of these players read Ogg Vorvis music files?

    1. Re:What about Ogg files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ogg vorbis format uses floating point math. Portable players typically have cpus that can't do floating point math. If ogg comes out with a fixed point solution then portable players will probably come out with support for the format.

  109. What We Really need ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What We Really need is a blank device. A simple small mp3player sized device, that is built to be hacked! A build it yourself MP3 player. And if it had a Crusoe processor it would really rock. but for now I will just wait for the Yopy to come out next month.

  110. HipZip has no problems by staplin · · Score: 2

    I got an Iomega HipZip as a gift last spring, and I haven't had any problems sharing between my macs at home and my win2k at work.

    It uses 40MB PocketZip disks, which can be a little limiting, but the media is cheaper by the MB, and it allows you to swap disks with other users easily.

    1. Re:HipZip has no problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have a HipZip, and run it both on my windows and linux boxes, easy to setup, occasionally the 40MB limit gets bothersome, but overall i like it.

  111. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by victim · · Score: 2

    I tried. I have firewire drives on my linux box. The iPod does not work as a disk `out of the box'. When the driver goes to read the `config' page it gets back garbage. Maybe there is a special command to flip the device into disk mode, maybe there is a bug in my linux 1394 stack, but it sure doesn't mount as a disk.

    If I were smarter about OS X, I would figure out how to trace 1394 packets and just reverse engineer what happens on the Mac, then make that happen on Linux.

  112. Portable CD Based Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (i really need to get a slashdot account...so lazy & so surly! anyways...)

    I actually have 3 different MP3 players:

    1. Varoman- very small unit, uses smartmedia cards plus 32MB internal. Had no end of troubles getting to run on my PC or laptop...crappy cheap connector too. My roommate has sort of ended up with it...works on his PC. Kind of a cheap clunky unit, but it does work and it's cheap. (heh got this free with PC purchase)

    2. Citizen CD Player- sorry no model number...a discman with MP3/CD-R/CD-RW features. Again it works but it's a tad on the non-user-friendly side. But being able to burn onto CD-RW is definitely awesome. It can handle folders- comes with an AC adaptor even, now only if it had a remote (it's on my home stereo) (got this one at a liquidators for CAD $80...suckers probably weren't paying attention to what it was!)

    3. Jensen MP3510 Car Stereo- well after getting the citizen I wanted a similar solution for my car real bad (only CD deck in car...I know, boo hoo, but it meant I couldn't use citizen & tape adapter). Well this thing I got for just under $300 CDN...after tax (15%) and adaptors to make it fit in my 2001 Focus, it was almost exactly $400 CDN installed. It's not too shabby, with remote (what's the deal with remotes in car stereos?) and removable faceplate- lots of blinking lights lol. Supports folders (the root of the CD being folder 1) and can handle up to 255 songs (should be enough) per CD. Can read CD-R and CD-RW (which is very very handy...I just keep my CD content file saved and I can alter it and reburn)...it even sports an AUX input (1/8" jack) just in case- though what else I would hook into the stereo is beyond me! Anyways it works great, maybe a bit too high tech looking (read: slightly tacky)- but CDs full of MP3s in the car...very nice indeed!!

    1. Re:Portable CD Based Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Kenwood MP3/CD car deck that has similar features to what you have mentioned. However, the limit on mine is 255 files per directory, and I imagine yours is the same.

    2. Re:Portable CD Based Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes my manual was a bit fuzzy on that point, however I'm fairly sure it will never be an issue for me either way!

  113. NEO Jukebox/Archos/iPod... by Bjorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Short summary: problems with the Archos but it was nice, like the NEO but not as a walking-around player (using it in the car), the iPod is simply the best MP3 player yet created, by a long, long way (assuming you have a Mac).

    Longer version:
    I have used all three, and currently own the NEO Jukebox and an iPod (as primarily a Mac user, obviously, although I use Windows PCs at work, usually). None of them are SDMI-impaired.

    Archos:
    I bought the Archos (6 gig) originally (this summer), and loved the size and form factor (although it was surprisingly heavy). However, the HD frizzed out several times and finally I had to return it after I got sick of the reformat/reload/repeat cycle. If they've fixed some of those problems it probably would be good (and the recorder seems nice). Support was questionable at best - I eventually got responses, but they couldn't do anything about my messed up drive.

    NEO Jukebox:
    After that I bought the 20 gig NEO Jukebox, and was generally extremely happy with it. It's a little large (about the size of a portable CD player, although thinner than most), but surprisingly light, and the bells and whistles are nice - it comes with a remote control and a nice interface, and replacing the HD is almost as easy as replacing the batteries on any walkman. I actually use it for work a lot to transfer files via USB, since it mounts very easily as a USB hard drive. It pretty much never skips, and looks cool with a nice blue backlight.

    The only problems I had with it have been:

    1) Slowwwwww transfer rates via USB (transferring even 5 gigs takes around 4 hours, let alone filling the thing - my ripped CD collection is about 2/3 done and is approaching 15 gigs).

    2) Lousy battery life - I usually get 4.5 hours max, which means that if I listen to it on el to my current contract, I run out of power by lunchtime.

    3) Pain to transport and recharge. During the summer when I was commuting weekly to Texas for a contract, I had to take the large charger every time, which was annoying. It's heavy and bulky. And on a day-by-day basis, there's just no way.

    4) Problems mounting in OS X. This may be better in 10.1.1 - I haven't tried it yet.

    Support was middling - no response ever when I emailed them, some moderate responsiveness when I phoned.

    iPod:
    When I first saw the price tag on the iPod, I thought they were n-v-t-s nuts. Then I actually went in and actually looked at one, and I realized I had to have one, and that I can't believe that it is so damn cheap. Salient points:

    1) Firewire. This thing loads fully in about 5 minutes. I just say what I want each morning, take a shower, grab it and go after it syncs up.

    2) Size. It is *tiny*. Literally the size of a deck of cards. And light. I throw it in my coat pocket on my way to work and forget it's there.

    3) Design. The interface is fantastic - even better than the quite good NEO interface. It looks and feels incredible. I don't know anyone (even Mac haters) who hasn't immediately asked "where can I get one?" about three seconds after holding it in their hands.

    4) Portability. If you travel at all, this thing blows away every other MP3 player. It's not even close. You need exactly one small cable to recharge and sync, and the iPod itself is so small that it basically is a non-issue.

    5) Battery life. This is a big one - I have used the iPod all day for most of the last couple of weeks, and have never even gotten as low as a half charge. It says 10 hours, but I would guess it's more like 15 at normal use.

    I have basically nothing negative to say about the iPod.

    Basically my plan is to use an FM transmitter to use the NEO in my car, which should be perfect. I'll load it with my whole CD collection overnight about once a month, and otherwise just leave it there.

    So there it is. Hope that's of use to someone.

  114. What is DMCA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I always wondered what this means:

    Defend Microsoft from Competition Act ?

    Disney-Microsoft Corruption Arrangement ?

    Please enlighten me :-)

    1. Re:What is DMCA ? by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 2, Funny

      Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Doesn't Mean Crap Anyway...)

    2. Re:What is DMCA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defending Monopolies' Cashflow Act

  115. iPod for Windows -- they're trying by mactari · · Score: 2

    Though Apple, with their new "we make solutions" attitude, probably won't care for it much, there is a commercial app that allows you to use the iPod on Windows: XPod (great names, eh?)

    http://www.mediafour.com/products/xpod/

    You can already use it as a hard drive with a Firewire port using some software they have for download. The "iTunes-ish" support will have to come later.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  116. iPod as external harddrive by NoShadow · · Score: 1

    while it's true that iPod works as an external harddrive for any firewire equiped computer, the file system used is HFS+, which is not supported by windows or linux. There's a project on sourceforge to add HFS+ support for linux, but it's still in pre-alpha stage.

    So the only solution is to buy some third party software that lets you read HFS+ under windows.

  117. OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by fnorgby · · Score: 1

    [quote] just hop to the "Terminal" and do a "cp -R /Volumes/[iPod Name]/Music/* ~/Music" [/quote]

    This is funny. If macs had command interfaces back in 1984, the world might be a much different place today. I would've bought one instead of my Atari ST. Sure, the ST was a wannabe, but the lack of anything like SuperDOS or gulaam on the Mac is a primary reason why I eventually bought an XT instead of a mac.

    I thought the official party line was that CLIs were "evil", like two-button mice...

    1. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by toupsie · · Score: 2, Funny
      I thought the official party line was that CLIs were "evil", like two-button mice

      That's what us Mac zealots want you to think. Its a part of our propaganda goals. Apple has had a historical problem of building enough machines to match demand so as a Mac zealot we really don't want too many converts so we don't have to fight for a Mac. Those "deficits" of the Mac platform are meant to drive the weak minded to Windows.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    2. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by TWR · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you wanted a command line for a pre OS X Mac, you should have grabbed MPW (Macintosh Programmer Workshop). It provided a UNIX-y command line and programming environment. It was payware for a long time, but Apple started giving it away about 5 years ago.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    3. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by buserror · · Score: 1

      I thought the official party line was that CLIs were "evil", like two-button mice...

      I've been working all those years on both UNIXes and assimilates (Pr1mos!) and on Macs.
      I've now reconciled both the threads by releasing the geekiest terminal emmulator for OSX : one that uses OpenGL to render text! [shameless plug Homepage]

      As for the iPOD, the folder that contains the music is indeed invisible... to the Finder but NOT to a terminal... So I'm not sure that it can count as a 'piracy protection' device at all.
      In any case, you could always copy the files "by mistake" by typing
      cp -r /Volumes/
      Does that make zsh -or my tab key- a terrorist helper device ?

    4. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there WAS that whole "OS 9 and earlier sucks ass as an operating system" thing.

    5. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by fnorgby · · Score: 1

      [quote] It was payware for a long time, but Apple started giving it away about 5 years ago.[/quote]

      And if you noticed, I was talking about 1984 not 1996. People in Mac retail outlets at that time still couldn't get past the "Command line? Why would you need one?" crap.

      f-

    6. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by TWR · · Score: 2
      There were other CLI tools for the Mac besides MPW; it was just the officially sanctioned one (even way back when; I don't know if it was around in 1984, but it's pretty old).

      I was just pointing out that there was no inherent anti-CLI bias among Mac cognicenti, such as programmers. If Mac fan-boys feel a certain way, well, they're fan-boys.

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    7. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by gig · · Score: 2

      Please ... please ... no more CLI vs GUI arguments. These days, you can have both if you want them, but in 1984, technology dictated that you choose one or the other. Let it rest. I ... am ... falling asleep ... just typing ... this.

    8. Re:OT , command lines (was Re:iPod?) by nullman · · Score: 1

      In 1984 maybe technology dictated that you coose one or the other, but not in 1985... The Amiga 1000 had the best of both worlds (built in) and multitasking to boot!

      Ahh, the memories...

  118. They won't learn ours. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they use "theft" and "copyright infringement" correctly, maybe I'll use another word like they want.

  119. Just bought a DVD/CD/MP3 player by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    I just bought a player with DVD, CD, CD-R/W, CD-R, and MP3 built in myself. I'm sure this means I'll probably not be able to use the "anti-pirate" CDs, but I'm looking forward to returning those for a cash refund (or else I phone Visa and have them deny the charges).

    Cost was about $99 in a Post-Thanksgiving sale at the Bon Marche. Can't remember the manufacturer - think it was Korean.

    My impression is you need to ask what kind of player you mean. Do you mean a hand-portable? For that, if you have an iMac, try the iPod. Do you mean a home player? These are commodities now - just get a DVD/CD/MP3 player - cheap enough. Do you mean a car player? Think these price around $150 now.

    It's all part of the marketing cycle - best time to buy new tech is three years after introduction - price curve flattens around then. And that's the point that we're at now.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  120. Suggest: Kodak mc3 and CompactFlash by tomharvey · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the Kodak mc3 is really underappreciated.

    http://www.kodak.com/US/en/digital/cameras/mc3/

    mp3 player with a digital camera thrown in. Still quite small and light.

    Transferring music in or out is a matter of plugging the CompactFlash card into an $8 PCMCIA card adapter (or a $25 USB CompactFlash card reader). I bought the version that comes with a 16MB CompactFlash card (way too small, of course), and replaced it with a 256MB card. The smaller card (and the bigger one, too, when you're not using it for music) is great for your other digital camera. This is a nice, fairly OS-independent way to deal with transfers, as long as your OS can understand an MS-DOS filesystem.

    It also comes with a USB connection, but I've never used it.

    The mc3 plays CBR and VBR mp3's, and has upgradeable firmware. I found an internet retailer with "nerds" in their name selling it (and its separate case) rather cheaply.

    1. Re:Suggest: Kodak mc3 and CompactFlash by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2

      holy cow, that's one of the coolest things I've seen in a long while. Does it take Type II compact flash cards? Can you comment on the quality of it's video/photo? I see it's only 640x480 for stills and 320x240 for video (I'm not expecting superb SLR or anything), but is the quality ok?

      I'd love to take something like that snowboarding. Listen to music all day, take videos/pictures of everyone in the half pipe.

  121. NEX II by ramblinrednek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the NEXII at http://www.frontierlabs.com Nice and small little unit with support for 1gig IBM microdrive.. The base unit is $99 (less any CF cards or microdrive). I use it under linux, Mac and Windows.. just through the CF card in my box and copy over the songs..

  122. Another lesser known product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While its more a of no frills player although it does read ID3 tags. Emerson makes a personal CD player that also plays MP3 CDs as well. 12+ hours of play time for 2-AA batteries (longer w/ NiMH)

    Check your local Wal-Mart or other electronics store. The price is around $60 which is a lot cheaper than some other alternatives.

  123. Red Hat eCos based device - Iomega HipZip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought a Iomega HipZip for $99 on Amazon. It is a USB player with removable cartridges that can play MP3 files and Windows Media files. It was simple to copy my files over, I plugged it into my computer and dragged my playlist and my MP3 files over. It uses the Dadio OS which is based on Red Hat's eCos kernel OS. The device allow new codecs and firmware upgrades as they become available.

  124. Iomega Hipzip by cleveland61 · · Score: 1

    I have an iomega HipZip. If you're not familiar with it, it uses 40 meg mini zip disks. Works just like any other zip drive except that it also functions as an MP3 player. It has its draw backs (the GUI isn't the best) but it has no digital righht managment that I have come across. Also, the disks are about $10 each in bulk and the tak up almost no space. I've always had good luck with iomega. Just my $.02.

  125. Against copyright in the todays form by Marco+Krohn · · Score: 1

    While your point is valid, I think that the right to make a copy for your own usage is an important part of our system and society. E.g. some companies would profit if all libraries were closed, but the society would certainly not.

    The intention of copyright was to protect the rights of the author, not of the publisher. Unfortunately this has changed and today the author gets only a very small percentage of the total monoey and the copyright is the instrument of the mega-corps to protect their money. Copyright is nothing were the society profits from it just helps a minority to get richer and richer.

    I think we made terrible mistakes in the past and it is time to change copyright back to something were the society and not few profit from. Copyright should guarantee the author a fair part of the income, but finaly his work should become a part of public domain. Copyright should be something the society profits from (by giving the author an incentive) and should not be perverted to be used against us (the society).

    I totaly agree here with John Gilmore in many many points he a lot others he made in his article:

    http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html
  126. Re:Seconded and amended - try the jukebox recorder by emag · · Score: 2

    And of course, no SDMI anywhere in sight.

    Have you upgraded to the latest firmware (1.21d) listed on their page, yet? I'd be curious as to what, exactly, "Serial Copyright Management System", and how it affects the usefulness of this device.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  127. Check out mp3.com by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    mp3.com reviews a large selection of mp3 players, many of which are not SDMI.
    Any combo hard-drive/mp3 player like the neo jukebox, the archos or the nomad jukebox can't be SDMI compliant.

  128. Sony MD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They cant be paired up side by side with MP3 players on technical specs, because they aren't MP3 players.
    BUT when you go deep into the purpose for these gadgets, you can do the right type of comparison, and i feel the MD comes out on top.

    We replaced the robust and reliable cassette walkman with the CD walkman because it sounded better, and you could pick and shuffle tracks.
    But because we had to abandon skip free playback, and home made mixes, we felt torn.
    What we really wanted was a hybrid. Keep all the best features of both, and you've got a happy camper.

    And that is precisely all that MD players are!
    I've had one for a while now, and I have tons of home made disks to choose from and make new one's all the time (about 1$ ea). The model I have has built in AM/FM radio, and with compression can store 300mins on the default 74min disks) so I'm never out of tunes. It's lighter and smaller than an IPod, and so battey efficien, it's not even funy (it recharges in less than an hour anyway)

    Obviously IT IS NOT PERFECT!! If I wanted to improve on the near perfection of such device, I'd make the transfer/creation process be faster, rather than the curren't "real-time" way. You have to realize that comming from cassette making this is not considered a flaw. Along with data input, and editing from your computer would be nice too. Although labels on the disk itself is all I really need.

    In essence you have the best of cassette/CD walkman all rolled into one: Robust, skip-free, compact, cheap media, HiFi, instant song access.
    So for portable music, this IS the best next solid step. Gadget freaks might disagree, but these guys read novels on a Palm - because they can!

  129. Re:Aiwa MP3CD by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    I have one of these Aiwa MP3 CD players in my Ford Ranger truck. I've had it for close to 4 months now - and I like it a lot for the relatively low price.

    I agree that it has some issues with skipping, but I've found it's only really bad about it when you use re-recordable CDRW discs in it. (It's cool that it can read those at all, really, since most players don't.)

    The lack of in-song resume on MP3s is a little annoying, but not a "show stopper" by any means. (It does resume in the middle of songs if you're playing standard music CDs.)

    I really think the biggest factor in how much a car CD player skips is in the installation. I had a friend with a Sony CD/receiver that always skipped in his car. One day, he got fed up and shoved a couple pieces of foam packing material around the unit. Problem solved!

  130. A great alternative to MP3 Players Already Exists by __aawwih8715 · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Its called MiniDisc and its a very mature and developed alternative.

    Media for mp3 players is expensive unless you get the optical kind. Media for minidisc is cheap. You can record stuff, batteries last long and the players are as small as mp3 players for the most part. If you get one of the newer sony's you can compress your music further and fit 5 hours on a minidisc. I'm not sure if this is advisable as i've not heard it.

    I love my minidisc player as i can't stand listening to the same songs over and over again.

  131. Re:Seconded and amended - try the jukebox recorder by shpshftrX · · Score: 1

    I have the Archos 6000. How are you getting 10 hours of battery life? Are you using the standard MH batteries that come with unit? I only get 4 hours? What brand of MH batteries are you using?

  132. And you can download from it... by gosand · · Score: 2

    I have had my Rio500 for a while too, and I use RioFXP (found here and all over the net) instead of the bundled software that came with it. You can upload and download songs to/from the Rio500. You can also do any kind of binary file, which makes it a nice file transport mechanism, provided the file is 64MB. Just don't try to play one of them. :-)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  133. Terapin Mine Handheld by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this at Thinkgeek. It is a Linux-running 10 Gig HD with USBs, Ethernet, PCMCIA, etc... I don't think it records, but it sounds really cool anyway. Here's the manufacturer's link.

  134. Why not Handhelds by Razman · · Score: 1

    First off, have you seen the memory on Handhelds?
    have also seen what memory availbe to handhelds?
    I have a Ipaq, 32 MB or memory, then you can add a 512 MB CF card. then you have no probs, and if that is not enough you can get a IBM Microdrive 2GB to add to the Ipaq, now granted there is costs to this as well, but if really needed, you could also use the handheld to download the mp3 directly, would even need to transfer from the comp to the handheld.

    personally, I am happy with my Handheld as a MP3 player, mainly cause it's an all in one unit, hell I can even rip my DVD's into divX and watch them on my handheld.

    Raz.

    1. Re:Why not Handhelds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handhelds are the way to go.
      just for total overall usage
      and even if you refuse to use Windows.
      they have Linux for the Ipaq Handhelds. =) sweet!

      Ch405

  135. iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod. Enough said.

  136. Neo Jukebox 2200 by ArgoTango · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Neo 2200 features a 20GB USB hard drive with a multi-line display that's easier to use than the Archos. I was considering either the Archos 20G model or the similarly priced Neo 2200 because both are MP3 Players that also double as USB hard drives for data storage. The Neo is larger in size, and a little more cumbersome as a result. On the other hand, they've placed the hard-drive under an easy to open panel so upgrading to 30+GB drives later is easy. Upgrading the Archos yourself involves voiding the warranty.

    I've been using the Neo for over a month now, and it's working great for me.

  137. seeing how we are on the subject of mp3 players... by CrazyP · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any experiance/knowledge of a good car mp3 player? I had an unexpected run in this summer and to make a long story short my cars cd player got trashed as it was thrown into a stream (a long with me). So I am looking to replace this with an mp3 player. What are some good ones for the car?

    --
    How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
  138. iPod as external harddrive (Win HFS+ utility) by just+someone · · Score: 1

    You can read HFS+ files, on winblows, use macopener2000 by dataviz.

    http://www.dataviz.com/

  139. MiniDisc players/recorders have copy protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most (or all) MiniDisc devices use SCMS, which prevents you from making digital copies of music (you can still make lower-quality analog copies). Even if you record something through the microphone (or analog input), it's marked as copyrighted, and you can't do anything about it even if you are the copyright holder. It's not as bad as SDMI, but it's the reason I won't be buying any MiniDisc players.

    1. Re:MiniDisc players/recorders have copy protection by satsujin · · Score: 1

      MiniDisc players may have copy protection, but it's been possible, for years to over-ride this. In Japan, they sell devices to do this, right next to the MD player/recorders.

      Don't sweat the MD protection, it's worthless.

    2. Re:MiniDisc players/recorders have copy protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's worthless, I've seen plans for SCMS strippers before. It will also possible to create devices like this for SDMI. But it's probably illegal to use, make, or give information about devices like this in the U.S., under the DMCA. I'd prefer not to give money to companies that support restrictive "features" like this, and that's also the reason why I don't have a DVD player. DVD encryption (and region coding) is worthless too, but people have been arrested and put on trial for proving it.

  140. Re:Seconded and amended - try the jukebox recorder by isaac · · Score: 3, Informative
    Have you upgraded to the latest firmware (1.21d) listed on their page, yet? I'd be curious as to what, exactly, "Serial Copyright Management System", and how it affects the usefulness of this device.

    I have installed 1.21d. SCMS is the bozo-bit-based copy protection scheme used by consumer digital audio recorders (DATs and CD burners, mainly; it's mandated by the Audio Home Recording Act for any digital audio recorder, and this thing qualifies). SCMS has very little practical effect on this device for 2 reasons:

    - One, the SCMS system allows one digital copy from an original copyrighted digital source (e.g. a CD), which is all you really need in most cases. It just won't let you record digitally from a digital copy made with an SCMS device (e.g. it would block recording from a CDR copy of an original CD, if the CDR copy was made with a consumer standalone audio CD burner).

    - Two, disabling SCMS on the Archos Jukebox Recorder is trivial, and doesn't require messing with hardware or firmware. When recording, set the "Artist Name" string to HFSCMSOFF. That's it. Re-enable with HFSCMSON, or just by resetting the device.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  141. Frontier Labs Nex II by angry_beaver · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if you're looking for a solid state, hard drive or CD based player but I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents.

    I have a Frontier Labs NexII. It's a solid state player that uses CF cards but can use the IBM microdrive. I love it. Excelent player, cheap ($99 USD) and you just fire it in your usb port and it shows up as a drive. No software, no restrictions, no hassles. Excelent player IMHO.

    www.frontierlabs.com

  142. Two Words: Rio Volt by dh003i · · Score: 3, Interesting

    RioVolt makes the best MP3 players -- they're rated the highest and their CD-MP3 players allow you to get more memory for your buck to store MP3's on. The CD-MP3 players bypass "digital rights management" and basically allow you memory for as many songs as you want -- all you need do is buy another CD-R or CD-RW. I personally use one CD-RW as a temporary storage place for songs I currently like; then I put the complete compilation of an artists songs on one CD-R or maybe two CD-R's. I have all the songs by Madonna on one CD-R, all the songs from Lords of Acid on one CD-R, and all the songs of Beethoven...well, that takes a few more CD-R's -- but you certainly can put all of his most notable works on one CD-R. Lets compare prices and options. Prices for MP3 players were taken from the parent-company's website, prices for one CD-R/RW were calculated from prices from 50 and 25 packs, respectively, from Amazon.com.

    Item [Price]
    Latest RioVolt [$180]
    Nomad Jukebox(20GB) [$350]
    1 CD-R (700MB) [$0.40]
    1 CD-RW (650MB) [$0.80]


    So, it costs you $350 for 20GB of music-memory from Nomad. Lets see how much you'd have to spend for 20GB if you used RioVolt:

    Assuming 20GB of CD-RW's:

    $180 + (20GB*1024MB/GB / 650MB) * $0.80 = $205.21.

    Assumng 20GB of CD-R's:

    $180 + (20GB*1024MB/GB / 700MB) * $0.40 = $191.70

    Thus, you save from $145 to $158 dollars by choosing RioVolt over Nomad. Its a no-brainer, regarding which product you should buy. Yes, Nomad allows you to alter the contents of your collection...so does RioVolt, if you use CD-RW's: and you'll still save 145 bucks.

    Put another way, if you wanted to spend $350 dollars for an MP3-playing device and the memory/CD's to store MP3's on, you get:

    (a) 20GB of storage space from Nomad
    (b) 134GB to 290GB of storage space using RioVolt and 213CD-RW's or 425CD-R's, respectively.

    This is not a practical comparison -- as few people want to carry around 425CD-R's, though some of the larger CD-booklets would let you do such. This is simply cost-analysis.

    Lets go back to the analysis of how much you save by using RioVolt and an according # of CD-RW's to get to 20GB. If you use RioVolt and 32CD-RW's to get 20GB of memory, you save 145 dollars. But lets be a bit more accurate -- you can't carry around 32CD-RW's in your pocket: you need a CD-folder. A Steel CD case capable of holding 60CD's, costs 20 dollars. So you actually only save 125 dollars by choosing RioVolt and buying CD-RW's to get to 20GB. Now, would you rather walk around with one Nomad Jukebox, or with one RioVolt, one steel 60CD case, and 125 extra dollars in your pocket? Your choice.

    P.S.: 125 dollars is enough to buy you one GeForce2 MX for your laptop.


    ----------

  143. Panasonic by zoftie · · Score: 1

    Panasonic just release a fine CD MP3 player.

  144. Does nobody learn ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought with the whole SDMI/DMCA thing people would have been outraged and voted with their feet.
    Apparently the music industry has us by the proverbials so to speak more so than I imagined.
    As an advocate of "I bought the records in the 80's and they're fubar" I believe that I should
    be able to download what I had... ok and some more... CD's are overpriced... and be able to
    listen to it on whatever I choose whenever I choose as many times as I choose.
    Apparently not!

  145. Creative Nomad Jukebox by Xanderkryo · · Score: 1

    I've had my Nomad Jukebox for over a year now I tihnk. I had upgraded it to a 30 gig HD a month after I got it. 6 gigs doesn't really hold all that much. *grin* Just last week I put in a new 48 gig HD (30 doesn't hold all that much either). With the latest Creative software and firmware, I'm able to transfer any type of file to and from the Jukebox. If you have older software and firmware, just rename everything to .mp3. Transfers are fairly speedy, not as fast as FireWire with an iPOD, that's a given. I would recommend the Nomad Jukebox to just about anyone wanting a good mp3 player. It can be easily upgraded (tutorials on the Net)and the sound is very good.

    --
    Alive Contains A Lie
  146. I'm about to rip out my Aiwa CDCMP3 by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    I wish I could send it back.

    What sucks about it?

    It has NO anti-skip memory. Ok, my car doesn't have the best shocks but it should not skip as often as it does. It even skips with MP3s! You'd expect the software could have been written to store a few seconds in memory before playing, but no, it just skips, and skips bad.

    It skips when it gets hot. After about 2 hours on the road in the winter, it just plain overheats. Ok, the placement of the stereo in the dash isn't ideal, it sits in front of the winshield vents and above the front vents. I've installed a 3" cooling fan (powered by the auto antenna lead) to draw off heat, but it still overheats. It's a little better riding with the faceplate flipped down, that allows air to pass through the CD slot and also reduces the heat from the faceplate. Even with the fan, I need to turn it off to let it cool or drive without heat. It's rated to operate up to 40C and I know that it doesn't get more than 30C in the dash. So it just plain sucks. How often do I make 3+ hour trips? Every weekend snowboarding if I can, and it really sucks not having tunes while driving through upstate NY and VT.

    Lately having problems reading CDRs. The unit is telling me it's a laser focus issue and needs service. Fantastic. It's barely over a year old now.

    Right now, I'm using the line-in to play MP3s off my laptop. I'm probably gonna pull the CDCMP3 and replace it with a cheap stereo with a line-in, one less likely to get stolen. I wouldn't mind the CDCMP3 being stolen, it'd give me a reason to replace it with something that works. However, I don't want to have to replace a broken window as well.

    Really, the way to go is to buy a cheaper stereo with a line in and use a laptop or other MP3 unit (I also use my Rio 300 for shorter trips). Yeah, it's not as easy to control or as cool, but it's cheaper and there's less chance of it getting stolen. I bought it when it first came out, before any of the reviews, and I now seriously regret not having waited for those reviews.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  147. Will sell my RIO 3 for 1,000.00 :) by TheCeltic · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that my (outdated) Diamond RIO 3 is now worth more because I CAN copy cdrom music to it?

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-= - The Celtic - =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  148. What does SDMI compliant mean? by BitterOak · · Score: 1
    As I understand, SDMI can mean more than one thing.

    One is the ability to play special encrypted files under carefully controlled circumstances, in addition to being able to play standard, open MP3 files. If that's the case, what does it matter if your player happens to be SDMI compliant? You can just ignore the SDMI features and use it is a normal MP3 player. The only drawback might be you have to pay a little more for the useless SDMI circuitry.

    The second phase of SDMI, however, as I understood it, would require the player to look for watermarks, possibly preventing you from playing normal MP3s which have the watermarks embedded in them. Of course, you want to avoid such players like the plague!

    Does anyone know what current SDMI-compliant MP3 players do? Do they look at watermarks yet?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  149. The Apple iPod is good, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an iPod 2 weeks ago and I love it. The only down side is it only works on Mac platforms. As this is what I have mainly at home I have no problems with it. The one nice thing I found is that it also doubles as a hard drive. With some developer tools you can view the "hidden" iPod_control folder. It contains all the music and other info folders that you aren't supposed to see
    A friend created a short real basic script to show this folder. It works like a champ. The one quirk we found was that under os 10.x you need to run the script before you open the iPod as the hard disk. Once run, you have access to everything. You can exchange your music as you see fit.

  150. Re: An alternative to MP3 Players Already Exists by Fionn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would never say MiniDisc is bad. Its brilliant.

    But wait 'till you come across Sony's (yes, the guys who invented the MiniDisc) NEW CD protection scheme: Besides being not standards compliant in a number of ways, those CDs all have their CopyBit set - and there you are with your grand MiniDisc(tm) recorder, equipped with a now totally useless digital input (unless you decide to spend another ridiculously high amount of bucks on a copy bit stripper).

    I wonder how all those hordes of people feel like, who have been tricked into buying this crap by Sony's "digital copy" campaign.

    Man I am so glad I havent bought any Sony product for years (since I heard about what their interpretation of artists freedom is).

    I would never say MiniDisc is bad. Its brilliant.

    Fionn

  151. Rioutil allows downloading from rio by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

    I followed the development of rioutil for a while and last I checked, the author had determined a way to allow downloading the tracks on a rio by sending a "dummy" track that had the same name etc and pointed to the same data, but was altered in some subtle way that made it invisible to the player yet downloadable. Now, I have never actually tried to download, but I think it was theoretically possible.

  152. No right to fair use by HardCase · · Score: 2
    Now I'm not looking to download any illegal music from the Internet. I simply want to listen to my CD collection on the train to work or while working out. And there is freely downloadable music out there. If I were to download a song at work or a friend's house, put it in my MP3 player I then wouldn't be able to transfer it back to my PC at home to add to my collection. Where is 'fair use' when the artist is giving away their music for free? And I don't have the link, but what of the recent surges in so called 'secure' CD's that one can't rip into MP3's? Where is the 'fair use' there? Or are we supposed to purchase multiple copies of the same music in different formats?"


    Uh oh, Fair Use rears its ugly head! Actually, it's pretty funny (I think) that the people who put up the greatest fuss about home copying of broadcasts are the ones who are reaping the greatest benefits! When VCRs first became a consumer commodity, the television and movie studios were aghast at the potential for lost revenues and maybe even going out of business. Obviously that didn't happen, but it did take a US Supreme Court ruling to clarify the issue.


    Unfortunately, like a lot of legal issues, it has become muddied in interpretation by laymen (even me!) There is no "right" to fair use. And no company is required to make sure that the media that they provide is copyable. I can't copy my Titanica DVD to a VCR because of the Macrovision copy protection. The manufacturer of the DVD wasn't obligated to provide a mechanism for me to copy it just in case I couldn't watch it on my DVD player.


    I'm not saying that SDMI is a good thing, though. I think that it's just further evidence that the recording industry is unable to adapt to take advantage of new technologies and new ways of doing business. They're no different than the television industry 25 years ago, except that their customers are a little more savvy and have more resources available to them.


    I guess, after all of this flailing about, what I'm really saying is that if you want to make a case for copying songs, free or not, you'd better not use fair use as a platform. Fair use merely gives you a legal defense for making copies for your personal use of media that you already hold a license to, but it doesn't mean that licensor has to make the media copyable.


    -h-

    1. Re:No right to fair use by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Too right. We have to play it the same way and pirate _everything_ - Books, Music, Films, TV, Software, Games... Only by players from countries like china or what ever where they don't bother with stupid macrovision or SDMI. Show those corporate pigs whos boss.

      hot Damn, i feel like crashing a plane into something

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  153. Or a Diva MP3 Player (stupid name though) by rthille · · Score: 1

    http://www.mydivaplayer.com/HTML/products.html

    Compact-Flash slot (type 1), small, long battery life, acts as a USB hard drive under Win2K and OS-X, comes with 64MB onboard for $99

    Robert

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  154. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I tried. I have firewire drives on my linux box. The iPod does not work as a disk `out of the box'. When the driver goes to read the `config' page it gets back garbage. Maybe there is a special command to flip the device into disk mode, maybe there is a bug in my linux 1394 stack, but it sure doesn't mount as a disk.
    From what I understand, the iPod's HD is formatted with an HFS+ filesystem. This is what currently keeps it from working with anything other than a Mac. If Apple had chosen a more widely-used filesystem (FAT32 would've been adequate for the intended purpose), you would be able to plug into just about any computer with a FireWire port and move files around.

    If Linux supported HFS+, it should be possible for it to talk to an iPod. AFAIK, Linux only supports the older HFS. (I'm no expert on Macs, having only a Quadra 610, but I'm guessing that the difference between HFS+ and HFS is a bit more than the difference between FAT16 and FAT32.)

    Here's a more general FireWire storage question. I remember reading something about the intelligent nature of FireWire devices; for instance, you're supposed to be able to hook a DV camcorder directly into a hard drive and dump video from tape to disk. What filesystem would be put on the drive to enable it to work in this manner...or is this a capability that isn't implemented in actual devices?

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  155. iOmega HipZip by alienlovechild · · Score: 1

    After hours of research and humming and hawing I finally purchased the iOmega HipZip. The HipZip has excellent sound and is very easy to use. The iOmega uses 40 Mb minidiscs which can be written and rewritten until they wear out. The advantage is that with the Memory (Flash) Cap on other players, you can spend $10 a disc and still have excellent usability without forking out hundreds of dollars. Another great feature is that you can also store data and documents on these discs and upload to other computers. At retail $179 CAD its the best buy for the money.

  156. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by tew · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not accurate. Runnning Debian/PPC with kernel 2.4.13-ben0 on my G4 Powerbook, the sbp2 driver is able to identify the iPod as a Firewire disk. Make sure you've got the CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION kenel option enabled -- the iPod uses the MacOS partitioning scheme.

    See iPod on Linux or ipodhacks.com

    ieee1394: NodeMgr: hotplug policy returned 0xfffffffe
    ieee1394: Device added: node 0:1023, GUID 0000000002002f0d
    ieee1394: sbp2: Driver forced to serialize I/O (serialize_io = 1)
    ieee1394: sbp2: Node 0:1023: Max speed [S400] - Max payload [0x09/2048]
    scsi1 : IEEE-1394 SBP-2 protocol driver
    Vendor: Model: Rev:
    Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
    Attached scsi disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
    SCSI device sda: 9780750 512-byte hdwr sectors (5008 MB)
    /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: [mac] p1 p2 p3

  157. Unlucky by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    What? they don't sell players without SDMI anymore? that's just too bad, seeing as in a few months (SSSCA) your country will be full of electronics that doesn't come without SDMI :)

    In the future all devices will include IP protection systems - PCs, phones, MP3 players, washing machines, satellites, planes. All of which will have been cracked years before, but will still have to be implemented because its the law. Hopefully, one day, one of your satellites or planes, will contain so much of this useless circuitry, that the weight of the redundant components will make it fall out of the sky and hit congress. ooops, that was an inappropriately timed comment directed at Americans...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  158. Fair use as a tool to undermine idea-ownership by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm no attorney, but from what I've read about fari use, I'll try to explain it. As a disclaimer, I in no way support the current intellectual ownership system; I am simply pointing out how to use some of the crooked rules of that system to empower one's self.

    Someone earlier implied that the only actions covered under fair use were "editorial and educational" actions. These are indeed covered, but are not the only actions covered. Fair use is basically any use of a copyrighted work/software that does not deprive the "owner" of his priviledges regarding the work/software (no, "copyrights" are not rights; the rights are listed in the Amendments to the constitution; I don't see the right to enslave information as one of those rights).

    Lets take a simple example. Lets say that I purchase a book which is copyrighted. Lets say I transcribe this entire book word for word exactly and put it online as a website. I password-protect the website so that no-one can access it but myself and I tell no one the password. This is clearly fair use. In no way has the owner of the book been prevented from making a profit off of his work. I am simply doing this so that I can read that book from any location I so desire.

    Lets modify that example. Lets say that I do as I did in the previous paragraph, except this time I also give the password(to view the site, not modify it) to other people who have bought the book and tell them to keep the password confidential. Again, clearly fair use by the same criteria.

    Of course, in such a case, one could say that anyt individual I gave the password to could post it online and give it to the world, thus allowing anyone to view the book. This is true. However, if such happened, I would be at no fault; I cannot control the actions of other individuals. In such a case, the individuals who dispersed the password would be at fault(in the eyes of our current flawed idea-ownership system). They and they alone would be liable, while I would bear no liability. I could not have possibly controlled their actions, and I was only offering them access to a fair-use service which I had access to myself.

    This is also a very simple scenario by which intellectual ownership could be undermined, and could be taken as a model for fighting against intellectual ownership. It is hard, if not impossible, to determine who let such a password leak. Someone I gave the password to could post it from a public computer, on a Yahoo! Club, newsgroup, message board, etc, leaving no trace. Once the password is known by others, and they use it, they can read the book; surely, many will copy the text and republish it on other web pages. Such will continue in a chain reaction.

    Of course, as soon as I'm aware that people have obtained unauthorized access to the book, I may be legally obligated to change the password and re-inform all of my fair-use "customers" of the password change. However, by that time, it would already be too late. The entire book would have been copied by individuals and posted on other websites -- ideally, based in nations that disregard intellectual property laws. The information would spread around the world, and control of it by courts would be impossible.

    This is much like the DeCSS decision. Did the court's ruling really have any significant impact on the dissemination of DeCSS? No, it did not. Even executable compilations of the code were available.

    In the modern world, information moves at the speed of electrons, which is relatively near the speed of light. In the future, with fiber-optics, information will move at the speed of light. Courts and law-enforcement move about as fast as old people ****. There is no way for any court to control the dissemination of information post-publication.


    ----------

  159. Build it yourself by omega9 · · Score: 1

    I ran into the same situation some time ago. Tho, I was interested as a portable MP3 player, as well as a portable mass storage solution. Some of the retail MP3 players double as mass storage devices but still didn't quite fit the bill.

    And then I found the PJRC High Capacity MP3 Player! You get full control, well, because you have to build it. It has IDE connectors for both standard and laptop hard drives, can be run off AA bateries or +12 DC (from car), has a headphone jack and RCA jacks, and a RS232 serial port for shell access to the firmware (upgradable). It has a LCD attatchment, but as you may read from the site the firware for it is still in devel (allthough it looks to work quite well). Honestly, I haven't ordered mine yet because I'm waiting for a break from work to have time to play. In the mean time, I'll just keep looking at the pictures.

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  160. Shine Micro SM2496 MP3 by libertynews · · Score: 1

    First the disclaimer - I'm lead programmer on this project so I'm biased. It isn't complete yet, but it will be available 'Real Soon Now'. We have beta units that we are testing right now and I am writing software as quickly as possible.

    The SM2496 is a general purpose DSP module for the Handspring Visor that uses a 160MHz TI DSP, 96kHz 24bit codec and has an MMC slot for MP3 storage. We use DOS formatted MMCs so transferring files using a MMC reader is fast and easy. With stereo inputs and outputs it can Play and Record stereo MP3 files at 128kbps.

    The module could also be used as a Game soundcard for Visor games, HAM radio modem (I have 1200bps and 9600bps G3RUH running), or any other audio application that a creative DSP programmer can come up with.

    Development modules with a Software Development Kit and JTAG interface for use with TI compatible JTAG pods will be availble soon (sooner than the consumer MP3 version). Any TI DSP programmers want to port Ogg Vorbis to the unit?

    Brian Lane brian@shinemicro.com
    Shine Micro

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
  161. For the true high tech devotee ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2


    ""I'm in the market for an MP3 player. I've been looking at various models and they all seem to be SDMI ready or compliant."

    My solution may seem a bit high priced, and it is if all you want is an MP3 player, but you *do* read Slashdot right?

    I picked up an iPaq 3835 last week, and the benefits are many. It not only treats MP3 files like any other file, which lets you copy back and forth all day, but it comes with Pocket Word and Excel, Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer, and a widely available list of third party software. Linux will be here for it soon as well, if history is any indicator.

    From an MP3 perspective though, the best benefit by far is the port for a Sandisk (et. Al.) Multimedia Card. These babys store 16,32 or 64 Megabytes and aren't much bigger than a postage stamp! You can hot swap these non-volatile gems, and while the 32 Megabytes packpacks for the rio 600/800 are huge and cost $100.00 a pop, the 32 Meg. Multimedia cards are going for $60.00. If you have a need to be truly portable for long periods of time, you will want to buy a number of add on memory cards whichever system you get. This means it is actually cheaper and *much* more convenient to go with the iPaq here if you buy enough multimedia cards. And unlike the Rios, it's FLASH, so there is no need for a battery in each one, making the weight issue favour the iPaq by a factor of more than 1000. The initial cash outlay is not for the weak at heart, of course (US ^00.00 for the iPaq), but if you have the bucks I am familiar with no better solution.

    A few final notes ... the iPaq has a rechargeable battery built in and I readily get 5 hours+ of loud mp3 playing out of a single charge. The "multimedia cards" can store any file, and the 64 Megabyte built in RAM can also be used to store MP3 files if you want to store about 75 Megabytes worth of MP3s without any need to hot-swap the "Multimedia" cards. And I wasn't sure until I tried it, but simply dragging and dropping from the ActiveSynced iPaq to my PC let me play Sammy Hagar from my PC just fine, so there is definately no 'funny' business going on with the WindowsCE (at least not the nefarious kind ;^} )

    As I say, not for the faint of heart or financially strapped, but a must get if you don't fit these categories!!!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  162. Then Apple is a DCMA violator! by J.C.B. · · Score: 2

    It distributes a utility called ResEdit that allows you to tamper with the metadata associated with Macintosh files, including the invisible bit!

    Someone needs to tell the RIAA about this, fast. No matter how large the company, no one should be able to get away with distributing hacker piracy tools!

    1. Re:Then Apple is a DCMA violator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off with their heads!!!!

  163. Xbox by equalize · · Score: 1

    With all the rumors about what the the Xbox will do, I'm sure someone will come out with an MP3 player for it and you'll be able to copy to and from the Xbox:)

  164. Re:When your jogging or working out, go for the RI by gowmc · · Score: 0

    I believe that the iPod comes with a nice 20 minutes of skip protection, sure it not exactly like a disk-less player, but for a person like me, the iPod is the best available.

    --
    -- If it aint broke, fix it till it is. --
  165. Rio MP3 by DEATH+AND+HATRED · · Score: 1

    When I worked for an outsource company we did tech support for a product called Rio JaMP3. That had an mp3 player, and believe it was a simple USB storage device for transfering. I could be wrong, its been a while since Ive worked with them but thats how I remember it. The price is also real low on them. bottom of page

  166. Re:If you're considering the Rio Volt, consider th by FreezerJam · · Score: 2

    Here's another vote for the AVC Soul. I did a fair bit of checking, and finally picked it because it had the minimum features, and the price was good. I paid about C$170 (US$110) at a computer show.

    The latest firmware ( 1.05s as noted above ) is truly slick. Tons of options, including the ability to set the rate of scan ff/rw within a track. Sounds pointless? Not at all...

    I timeshift a lot of radio, because there's tons of interesting stuff on at times I can't sit around an listen. I use the DLink USB FM radio, and record to disk, with post conversion to MP3 using LAME. But a single two hour jazz show will run to 50 meg. I have 5 or 6 CDs each with a week of my fav show - 11 hours each, makes 3.5 gig right there. That was what caused me to discard the idea of a hard drive based player. The morning show I like but overlaps with sleep ends at 8 AM - by 8:05 the automatic conversion is done, and a 30 MB CR-RW write takes about 1 minute. Then I can grab the subway, where radio doesn't work.

    Handily, the Soul has a Resume feature (restarts where you turned it off) but if you are trying to FF through a 2-hour track, you don't want to do it slowly!

    Supposedly the Soul can also read DirectCD formatted CD-RW, but I've never tried it. Doing that would let me automate the CD-RW write, so I would just pick up the pre-recorded CD in the morning and go.

  167. Re:Sssh.... Secret about Creative Labs SDMI suppor by HydrusZ · · Score: 1

    I've also owned a Jukebox for over a year now. As long as your software and firmware are reasonably up to date, you won't have problems transferring MP3s either direction. Where you run into problems is when you install the first version software from the original CD onto a computer... It will not let you transfer files from an already upgraded player to your PC until you upgrade the software also (from the website). Compatibility issues between the hardware and software I assume, and not related to copy protection. The only complaints I've had about the Jukebox are the physical size is a little big and 6 gigs aren't enough for me. And battery power, though I don't often use it without an AC adapter.

    What you may be hearing from people is that all of the files that come with the Jukebox (classical music, audio books) are copy protected. That does not apply to files you put on it yourself.

  168. car mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many moons ago I bought the Aiwa MP3CDC head unit for my car. Best $200 I ever spent. I can now copy mp3's directly to CD and play them in my car. Depending on quality and file size I can hold up to several hundred MP3's per CD. My car CD collection has been reduced to three CD's, clearing up the clutter and not having to worry about scratcihng them as I can just cut another copy and I'm good to go. It also has an input on the faceplate just in case you want to plug in a minidisc player or whatever. Will also support a MP3 CD changer if you feel the need. Nice little unit and a great solution for playing MP3's in the car.

  169. You need an Iomega HipZip by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
    Previous comments have mentioned the HipZip, but haven't gone into too much detail. The Iomega HipZip has no digital rights management, and works exactly like a Zip drive; you just copy your music over from your desktop machine.

    In addition to MP3, the HipZip also supports WAV, Microsoft Windows Media Audio, Dolby AAC, and Voice Age Audible formats. And it's got the best sound quality I've ever heard -- the thing sounds even better than my SoundBlaster Live! 5.1.

    Another cool thing about it is that it functions as a normal PocketZip drive as well, so if you want, you can use it as a portable storage device. And they're going for $99 now, which is a pretty sweet price considering I got mine last year for over $200.

  170. Re:Rio 500 - OT by borzwazie · · Score: 1

    here's a question for you about XP and serialized media - XP has this service running in the background that checks for the serial id's of mp3 players...can you disable this and still use your player? does the r500 even have one of these ids?

    --

    "We apologize for the inconvenience."

  171. This is probably not a non-issue by kalee · · Score: 1
    According to the actual SDMI specification[1], "SDMI compliant" does mean more than restrictions on file transfers. For example, any integrated microphone input in an SDMI-compliant device must "be restricted to mono voice-grade and band-limited."[2] Also, "unprotected digital playback (e.g., via USB speakers) shall be limited to linear PCM at 48 kHz 16 bit or below..."[3] Basically, in order to maintain content control, the SDMI spec requires that devices artificially limit the sound quality of both input and output.

    The specification also states that "any Content stored on the PD [portable device] shall be SDMI Protected Content."[4] I interpret this to mean that if unprotected content (i.e. mp3 files) are uploaded to an SDMI-compliant device, that device is required to place SDMI restrictions on that content before it is stored.

    -k

    [1] http://www.sdmi.org/download/port_device_spec_part 1.pdf

    [2] "SDMI Portable Device Specification, Part 1", version 1, p14.

    [3] ibid., p31.

    [4] ibid., p14.

  172. Records, Tapes, CD, SACD, DVD- by Krieger · · Score: 1

    Of course we're supposed to pay for the same music in different formats, why do you think they keep changing them?

  173. SDMI by Space · · Score: 1

    Several (maybe all) players can transport files other than MP3 and will happily allow you to download the other formats. If your player can transfer other files but not MP3 then a little hex editing to the software will fix that. I have modified the Samsung Yepp Explorer software for a friend (the Linux version has no limitations). Search the file for MP3 and replace it with anything (mp2, abc, 123, etc). Works for me

    --
    I Don't Work Here
  174. The best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem& item=1301659298

  175. Creative Nomad Jukebox by charstar · · Score: 1

    With the latest software, (not what I got when I bought the thing a year ago) you can transfer data both directions. Of course, the software is windoze based, but I think you'll find that problem with most MP3 portables.

  176. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by KoshClassic · · Score: 1

    So does this mean you can connect the iPod to a Linux box, copy MP3's to it, and use it on the go, no Mac required?

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  177. wow that's impressive by crayz · · Score: 1

    even moreso because it's over double the maximum possible transfer rate using USB, and over three times what Archos itself claims as the sustained transfer rate for the device

    hmm, I think that makes you a liar

  178. Inside the Archos.. by Myself · · Score: 2

    How tricky is it to get at the drive in the Archos? Is it just a few screws, or a big hassle?

    I'm asking because my laptop doesn't have USB, so I'd need to use the IDE interface if I wanted to access the Archos' drive while I was on the road.

    I'm seriously considering purchasing an Archos Recordable, since I really want to make _stereo_ recordings of stuff, and none of my laptops have more than a mono mic input.

    1. Re:Inside the Archos.. by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      It's just a few screws but the outer ones are "torx" so you need a slightly unusual screwdriver - it's not that hard to get hold of one of these though. You also need a really small philips screwdriver for some of the other screws.

      Other than that it's a relatively easy process - the hard bit is getting the blue plastic bumpers on and off without bending the case, since the case itself is very thin metal. I don't think you'd want to do it on a regular basis though, i.e. for transferring files, since the risk of bending the metal case is too high. If you have a static collection of MP3s and you want to do a single transfer you'd probably be OK.

      I posted a brief description on the archos yahoogroup, and there is a much better description (with pictures) at this site. There's a good FAQ at the same site which might answer your questions.

      Q.

  179. A week with an iPOD by buserror · · Score: 2, Informative

    Got my iPOD last week, I think I am objective in the choice I made.
    I made the first ever mp3 player on mac (Vamp) a few years back just so I could make myself MiniDiscs with mp3s. I've been waiting for a device like the iPOD for a LONG time.

    So the great points about the iPOD are known: 5Gb, large buffer, sync with iTune, super fast at copying etc.
    The less known facts is that it works as a real hard drive, so if you want to copy *files* between work and home, you don't need to carry the laptop around. Heck, even .iso fits in easy and *fast*!

    Now for the not-so-good sides:
    1) There is a bug in the iPOD that makes it garble playback after some use. I've had that problem twice, it generates a nasty little noise in the right channel after some hours of use. To fix that, you need to restart the iPOD ('reset' but you keep all your data, 'reboot' is more appropriate) after that it's clean again.

    2) If you want to listen to music with the iPOD while you recharge it with the firewire cable of your mac, you can't. It's hard drive OR mp3 player. It's too bad, since iTune eats CPU (like mad) while your iPOD sits there playing the unused hard-drive. I wish I could just tell the iPOD "Play dump, just sucks the voltage".

    3) Lack of remote control is hard to bear; I had that Sony MiniDisc player for years, and you can find it hard to have to dig the iPOD from whatever place it is to change something. Thats even more annoying because the thing is *slick*; chromed metal slips!

    4) No crossfade, No continuous play. There is no way to stick 2 files so they play as one, or to crossfade them. If you have live albums, it can be problematic.

    5) With that size you need STATS. I want to know which files I *never* listened to, which ones I listen in wich order, and all that kind of crap. it's 1000 songs (or so) it takes DAYS to sort playlists!

    6) 5GB is.... too small! I think 10Gb would fit my CD collection, with 5Gb I need to be selective.

    Overall, I'm very happy with the thing still, it's definitly an incredible device.

  180. Kenwood by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    I have a kenwood CD MP3 player in my car and it's excellent. I think i have the MP6090 (although it's snowing so i dont want to go out and check). The only downside is that it only supports an ISO filesystem so your directory names are limited to 31 characters, uppercase and no spaces. The filenames have the same restriction but the unit will display the id3 tag when it's actually playing a track.

    It has never skipped on me, plays cds, cdrs, cdrw's and mp3 encoded cds too. It also has am/fm radio, clock, cd text, allows you to name radio stations (although i presume the european version supports rds). The interface is a little fiddly but once you are used to it - it's great.

  181. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by victim · · Score: 2

    You are getting more info from your iPod than I am or the guy at neuron.com. Notice his kernel messages show an unknown type device and sequential ascii letters in all the text fields. This is the same thing I get. You on the other hand have it actually recognized as a SCSI disk!

    I'll have to play around some more. I suspect my ohci1394 is goofed. Maybe I'll put debian on an imac so I can trace through that and see what is different.

    Nice to know there is progress to be made!

  182. Archos Jukebox. by doublem · · Score: 2

    The Archos Jukebox is basically a USB hard drive that can play MP3 and WAV files you store on it. No copy protection, no data regulation. There's been a slashdot article on how to upgrade the 6 gig model to 20 gig (Although a 20 gig model is out now) it can record WAV files and I have a review of it on my web site www.matthewmiller.net.

    My review doesn't mention this, but it runs under kernel 2.4.x just fine. :)

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  183. AVC Soulplayer by Topgun1 · · Score: 1

    If you are looking at a Rio Volt, you might as well get the AVC Soulplayer. They are essentially the same core, except the Soulplayer was (at the time I bought mine) some $30 cheaper.

    And for people who are anti-CD mp3 player...I've taken my Soulplayer off-roading up here on the logging trails in the upper Upper Penninsula here in Michigan. It didn't skip-not a once-on my numerous excursions (the truck, however, needed a new suspension) :-)

    So the only time it really might skip is when it is loading a new song when you skip ahead 10 songs. But with the upgradable firmware, AVC has done well to make this a non-issue.

    Without much further ado, the link is http://www.soulplayer.com

  184. Speed? by InfoCynic · · Score: 1

    I read a good chunk of the posts and it seems that the main advantage of the iPod besides no SDMI is its firewire interface... are there any other players using firewire, or any supporting USB 2.0? I'm looking into getting one of these for Christmas, but I want to make sure I invest wisely. :)

    --

    "Recta non toleranda futuaris nisi irrisus ridebis"

    1. Re:Speed? by gig · · Score: 2

      iPod is the only FireWire MP3 player. Also, the only one with a high-speed interface of any kind. Make sure you try an iPod out before you purchase a device. Lots of people have said that a couple of minutes with iPod spoils you for other players.

  185. Neo by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own a Neo 25 portable MP3 player, produced and distributed by SSI America. It was rather expensive to get, but it has no copy protection mechanisms, and it doubles as a portable hard drive. It uses a 2.5 inch IDE laptop drive, which is replacable, and a rechargable lithium ion battery.

    I love this unit. It has played MP3s for me 8 hours a day for the past year.

    The Neo Jukebox is their latest Neo product, replacing the Neo 25. It looks even nicer than my unit. They also mape the Neo 35, a car MP3 player.

  186. the neo series is sdmi-free by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2


    the neo25 is a regular old usb-drive with mp3 decode hardware and an lcd display on it.

    you can copy TO and FROM it with zero issues. and recently, you can even use it with linux now that there's an update to the firmware (works with 2.4.latest kernel just fine!)

    the computer-geeks (store) has them for sale for $122. I paid close to $300 just a year ago. the only downside of this unit is that its bad on batteries (li-ion only lasts 2 hrs or so). and don't use 5400rpm 2.5" notebook drives with this unit; there's not enough power to spin the drive up! stick with the slower 4200rpm notebook drives (30gig works well).

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  187. Don't buy a Napa DAV 3xx by Richy_T · · Score: 2

    These things are supposed to be able to play VCDs, CDs and MP3 CDs. I bought two DAV 310s, one for me, one for my brother. It just about plays CDs but tends to skip at the slightest touch, I have not been able to create a VCD that plays on it without jumping and jerking (and from my research, neither has anybody else) and it's pretty hopeless at MP3 as well, I had to try five or six different encoders before I found one that didn't produce horrendous artifacts (these artifacts didn't show up under other players either). Add to that that it crashes, powers down sometimes when you hit stop and sometimes just plain refuses to do anything, takes ages to read in the list of songs and has a very long gap between songs.

    I have to say that this device was probably the worst value for money purchase I have *ever* made. I just can't say how much they suck.

    Rich

  188. And for the stuff my dad already owns on vinyl.. by Myself · · Score: 2

    "I bought Tommy on vinyl LP the week it came out. When I got a car with a tape deck, I bought it again on tape so I could listen to it in the car. Now that my vehicle has a CD player, I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for that music a third time! Long live piracy!" -- My father, as Underture.mp3 downloaded in the next room.

    Fuck the RIAA, the DMCA, and their little dog too! Honest people occasionally make copies too.

    Oh, and my other pet peeve: When I, a loyal fan, buy a CD when it comes out, only to discover that a month later, a "collector's edition" is released with 3 additional tracks, the industry must be out of their mind to think they'll take me to the bank for a second time! Helloooo, Gnutella! Gooooodbye, customer loyalty!

  189. Voice recording - That's 'protected' too? by oakestv · · Score: 1

    I just bought a Rio 800 as part of the Audible.com deal. It's working wonderfully and I'm very happy with my purchase but I did find the whole 'can't copy off the device' thing a bit of a pain for all the normal reasons. I'll admit I might use it to move music the SDMI is trying to stop me from moving. However, I cannot see how the SDMI can stop me from moving my own voice from the device! The Rio 800 has a built in voice recorder which I use to record conference proceedings and meetings with clients. While I can listen to them in my car or via headphones I can't download it to my computer (where I might want to email them to the other participants.)

    This seems totally unfair. Does the SDMI really mean to prohibit me from this as well?

  190. Rio 500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Rio 500 allows me to transfer MP3s back to the PC... I just have to use a third-party transfer program instead of the one included with the Rio to do it. There are good ones on SourceForge and elsewhere, for Linux and Windows.

    ---

    I'm not a real anonymous coward, I just play one on TV.

  191. corrupt smartmedia by neurojab · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else have a problem with the Rio corrupting your smartmedia cards?
    I have a 64 meg card, but when I transfer my mp3s to it, they take half the space they should. Then when I try to play tracks off the card, it plays the first part of one track, then skips wildly through the rest.
    Is this the fault of the card or the rio? I'd like some advice before I buy a new card.

    1. Re:corrupt smartmedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the early Rio 500s didn't deal with 64M cards properly. There's an upgrade on the Rio site, might be worth checking out.

  192. Sony Clie has what you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1- Display

    First of all it has an actual screen so that you can actually read the song names in ANY light and you can get more information about the songs instead of just the name. You can actually see multiple lines of your playlist at the same time! You get cool graphical display as well. Its a 320x320 16bit display! It rocks.

    2- Media

    It uses standard blue memory sticks. Works very nicely especially if you have other sony devices (like me). If you don't have other sony devices you will still love it. You simply put your clie in its cradle and start a program on the clie and suddenly you have a new drive letter in windows (I belive some one is working on linux software for it as well). You just copy your MP3s directly. It doesn't care about any security crap at all. You can copy ANYTHING onto the memory stick. Its a little portable hard disk. I have a 128 Meg stick in mine right now and I love it more than anything.

    3- It does all that other PDA stuff as well

    You get all the other cool palm stuff.

    In my humble onion there is no other choice.

  193. MPW (was Re:OT , command lines) by jpatters · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you wanted a command line for a pre OS X Mac, you should have grabbed MPW. It provided a UNIX-y...

    I use MPW to invoke DASM to assemble my Atari 2600 projects... it actually strikes me as more "VMS-y" then "UNIX-y", since it has that move the curser to where the command is writen and press enter (not return) kind of thing going. Of course, that could be because the only VMS app I ever had to use (on UVMVM, which I think UVM still uses) was a horrible calendar program called... shoot, I can't remember the name. It was horrible, though. Anyway, MPW isn't that horrible, but the mechanics of the user interface reminds me of that VMS program for some reason. Oh, and Mac mice have several buttons, it's just that all but one of them are actually on the keyboard.

    OBiPod:
    For those complaining about the price, I'm pretty sure that I read somewhere that the bare hard drive used in the iPod would cost about $400 by itself (retail). It may not be big (in GB), but it is small (physically).

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
  194. Phillips CD Player by Water · · Score: 1

    I was at Wal-Mart the other day and saw a Phillips portable CD player that claimed to play CD-RW and MP3 cd's. Anyone else seen this?

  195. Without fair use, copyright is unconstitutional. by Convergence · · Score: 2

    The first amendment gives freedom of speech. Thus, it trumps the vaguely worded copyright clause.

    So, this would make copyright nominally unconstitutional. Oops!

    How the courts repair this problem is by stating that copyright law must be as *weak* as possible, as least-restrictive as possible, for if it becomes one whit more restrictive than necessary, it immediately becomes unconstitutional because of the conflict with the first amendment.

    `Fair use' is just a codification of SOME of the things that copyright cannot control. A guide enumerating some restrictions that cannot be claimed by any copyright holder. That does not preculde the many OTHER rights granted by the first amendment.

    IE, 'fair use' is not a case of 'all thats not fair use is infringement', but rather, 'at least the things listed as fair use are legal'. The digital control industries want us to think of fair use as being the first definition, when its actually the second definition.

  196. Spec compare page should help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try this page for an MP3 compare chart that is based on the iPod.

    ...shows at least two units that do not comply w/SDMI.

    Yes, the iPod is one.

  197. general purpose programmable hardware not allowed? by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1
    In the longest term, there is a real risk (see for example the "SS"SCA), that general purpose programmable hardware will simply not be allowed, and we will have to hope that an illegal underground market for hardware that is not user hostile will appear...
    The Taliban can ban this sort of thing, because they can factually suppress the technology. But not in the US - it would be too damaging to the hardware industry. Hey, if it did happen it would require a full-blown fascist regime - in that circumstance getting a decent stereo is going to be the least of your worries ;-)
  198. Mojo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive got a tdk Mojo, and i love it. Being CD based, it wont fit in your shirt pocket, but SDMI will get ya otherwise.

  199. What filesystems do these CD MP3 player support ? by sakari · · Score: 1

    Anybody know what filesystems do CD based MP3 players like the Rio Volt 250 support ? I have all my MP3 CD's burned with ISO9660 + Rockridge extensions, so can I read these CDs properly or at all with these players ?

    Of course these can be read as standard ISO9660 CD`s, but you dont get the full filenames. Am I right ?

  200. Um yeah.... by byron150 · · Score: 1

    I dislike Hard Drive devices because I am rather hard on my electronics and I can't see the HD surviving very long while I carry the damn thing everywhere. The cd based MP3 players also bother me because I would rather not have to burn off a new disc everytime I find something I like and download it. On Amazon you can still find the good-ole Rio Player http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005NIMH/ qid%3D1002007984/sr%3D1-19/ref%3Dsr%5F1%5F7%5F19/1 07-8040907-5533359 which is fairly cheap compared to the other things you see out there and is expandable with Smart Media cards which are everywhere and also mount as a drive on your computer or laptop. This was Pre SDMI and is the only real solution for the economically challenged who want the quick fix.

    --
    -Never believe in the end of something great, send it to sub-committee for further study!!! - ME
  201. Another Rio Volt owner by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    I also love my Rio Volt, but it has a few problems... first, tiny little bumps that wouldn't faze a real Discman make the Rio go nuts. The Rio buffers most of the song, but if I'm driving and I hit a small bump at the beginning of a song, I have to lift it up in the air and wait several seconds.

    Second, it takes a long time (2-3 blocks of driving) to load the track list on MP3 CDs. That's better than the Brand X MP3 CD player I had before, but still much slower than a RAM-based player.

    Third, the cheapest Rio (the blue one) has no backlight, M3U support, AC adapter, or car adapter, and the firmware can't be upgraded.

    But it's still worth getting the Rio instead of a RAM-based player, simply because a $1 CD-RW will hold 700 MB and the disc can be used in any computer, car MP3 CD player, or DVD/MP3 player.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  202. Re:Ipod! - Format as UFS by Selur_Natas · · Score: 1

    OS X and linux should read UFS just fine.
    the difference between HFS & HFS+ is the number of disc blocks is greater in HFS+ so you can get smaller file spaces.

    --
    . Mankind evolved from apes, JonKatz is still a baboon.
  203. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a surprise! An Apple end user product that SPECIFICALLY doesn't work with Linux! I never thought I'd see the day.

  204. Re:Ipod! - Format as UFS by baboyer · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a ton of differences between HFS and HFS+. The disk block thing is just what was immediately obvious to end users back when HFS+ was introduced, because MacOS 8.1 didn't take advantage of the other features. Small list of new features: unicode filenames, longer filenames, unix style permissions, 64 bit file size, 32 bit block numbers, etc. I'm actually working on HFS+ support for linux, but it's not ready for users yet. (Check out the SourceForge project linux-hfsplus)

  205. Re:archos jukebox w/review link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stefanos is right, no silly copy protection on the Archos, you can upload ands Download all you want. Here is a review of that player that details the lack of SDMI security.

  206. Yes, RIO PMP500 rocks! by Tom7 · · Score: 1


    The headphones that come with it are quite small, and not that bad for small ones, but you'll get much better sound out of real headphones.(My current headphones are unfortunately much larger than the rio itself!) The worst thing about the headphones is that they almost seem *designed* to tangle... I've never pulled them out of my pocked and had them not be tied into some impossible knot.

    The USB interface rocks (for win, at least).

    Bundled software is crappy, but usable.
    Yes, battery life is awesome.

    I think your battery clip might have lost its spring... I had to bend mine out a little more recently. My RIO is totally shockproof; I drop it all the time.

  207. they also have other uses which just improve them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you enjoy live music, you can tape concerts (hey, there are bands which do allow taping, and mics small enough that they wont be noticed for bands that dont), and in addition to that, the actual compression of ATRAC is better (in compared to mp3). One of the music mags did a comparasent and said that the average comparable compression of ATRAC is about 290k in mp3 terms. I've got an Aiwa FM-75 and a Sony MZR-500, and a USB digital connector, and if I take it straight from disc, they sound better then the mp3s of 256k quality.
    To top it off, many players are hackable for cute little features.

    I recomend www.minidisc.org for more info.

  208. Rio VOLT ROCKS! by [gW] · · Score: 1

    Hey, I was in the same place, and i finally decided not to bother with anything that you couldnt put a cd in, so it came down to the rio volt, and it kicks ass, perhaps one of the best buys i have ever had.

    The thing to note is that you should install the newest firmware immediately before doing anything else, as it fixes a lot of the problems.

    I mean, buy a small 12 cd holder, and there you have 700 megs x 12 cds worth of mp3's, available to you whenever you want, what more could you really want?

    i believe it plays up to 192kbs encoded mp3's too, and anything higher it just plays at 192.

  209. Samsung Yepp by obi327 · · Score: 1

    I would highly recommend the Samsung Yepp. I purchased one a few weeks ago and it has been working nicely. It comes with 64 mb of built in ram, plus a SmartMedia expansion slot. In addition, it has an FM radio tuner. A good place to buy it is at CompUSA.

    --
    The dog got loose on my computer, and now there's XP all over the screen. -Paul www.ploeb.net
  210. Car player and portables by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

    http://www.ssiamerica.com/

    I have one of their car players installed in my car. Only done last week. No SDMI crap there! I also believe their portable units are very similar.

    Go do some web surfing... hrmmm... you be suprised at what you will find outside the world of slashdot.

    --
    Does it go on forever?
  211. sony clie 760 by mliu · · Score: 1

    I know I'm replying too late for anyone ever to see my post, but if you don't mind spending the cash, the Sony Clie 7x0 PDA series, which can be had for around $400 these days I think, offers mp3 playback with no copy protection. It can also play back SDMI compliant ATRACs, but of course no one uses that really.

    Oh, and plus you get a free PDA thrown in with your mp3 player hehe.

  212. Open Source Player by pjrc · · Score: 3, Informative
    If your MP3 player was open source, you wouldn't have to worry about it doing undesirable things behind your back... or at the very least you could hack on it to make it do whatever you want.

    There actually is an open-source MP3 player. It's not a shiny polished product like a Rio, but I can say with 100% confidence that is has absolutely no SDMI features, since I designed it!

    Ok, mod me down for shameless self promotion now.

  213. From JazPiperPC works fine. by aliawork · · Score: 1

    Just tested downloading from my new JazPiper, and it works fine.. no problems..

  214. All you never wanted to know about my Rio Volt by zbuffered · · Score: 1
    It only buffers 120 seconds though. I'm not sure how much memory it has, but for regular CD-audio, it buffers... (let me check) 40 seconds or 10 seconds, depending on how you set it. For MP3s, it's not 120 seconds all the time. What it does is it'll spin up the disc, read 120 seconds, then spin the disc down. This saves battery life (and it's cool to show your friends), but it doesn't have 120 seconds in memory all the time.

    I'm going to do a scientific(R) test of my Rio Volt, where I time the length of the disc being spun down, and see when it spins it back up (it obviously wouldn't do it at 120 seconds, maybe 1/2 way through).

    Approximately 1 minute. Yay.

    I like that they update the firmware fairly often. You can download a small file off their website, burn it to a CD, put it in, turn it on, and it upgrades itself. Since I bought it, the most recent firmware adds a ton of features, and shortens the hit-play-button-to-music-playing time from, say, 20 seconds, to about ten, on the CD full of MP3s I have in there now.


    It gets about the same battery life playing MP3s as CDs, maybe a little better, but not significantly. I don't care, I just use rechargeables. It plays 800mb CDs, CDRW, WMA, MP3, CD-audio, and possibly Ogg Vorbis in the future via a firmware upgrade. I've never had a problem with a disc not working here that worked anywhere else. It's cute, comes with a remote control that's almost useless because I can't get it to stay on my shirt pocket (stoopid weak spring), the battery compartment comes open a little too easily, the case it comes with is kinda weak--there's no little window so you can see what track is playing. The line-out minijack isn't wired right. It should output at a fixed level, but outputs based on the volume and EQ settings, and as such is no different than the headphone plugin. The LCD display is a little small--it shows two tracks at once, but only about 16 characters at a time, and it scrolls r-e-a-l-l-y slowly. If you hit the button for Next Track, it has to load it into memory from scratch, and is prone to skipping during that time if you're moving. I also wish it wouldn't turn off when you open the lid, since it takes so long to start back up afterwards.

    I have no major complaints with my player, it's great for a lot of things, and it's cheap. If you're looking to get a portable MP3 CD player, this is the one to get.

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  215. Re:general purpose programmable hardware not allow by Hobbex · · Score: 1

    They can ban it, they probably could not get rid of it, but they could certainly ban it. Think drugs...

  216. Rio Volt buffer and working out by svferris · · Score: 1
    I too own a Rio Volt and love it! I use it when I go to the gym and I never really have a problem. But, I spend most of my time on machines and weights. I don't do running (bothers my knees).

    I have to admit, if you enjoy working on the treadmill or something else that's active, don't get the Rio Volt then. It works great when I do brisk walking on the treadmill. But, as soon as I start to run, the Rio Volt will get one good jolt, then start skipping like crazy. Once it starts, you have to pretty much get the thing to a perfect standstill before it can recover.

    So, if you're really active, go for something like the Nike PSA. But, otherwise, definitely get a Rio Volt.

    Oh, and get the new one (250, I think?) that has the FM player and the ability to use the remote with the built-in LCD.

  217. Re:If you're considering the Rio Volt, consider th by zbuffered · · Score: 1

    I listen to a lot of episodes of Loveline(the radio show) that I download in MP3 format. They're 2 hours each, maybe 1.5 when you skip through the commercials and songs. They're encoded at 16kbps, and they come in at 15 megs/2 hours. The sound is acceptable for the talking, I can fit like 50 episodes (that's 100 hours) onto one CD, and they make cross-country trips so much easier!

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  218. Alpine CDA 7878 by Pansy · · Score: 0

    If you think the Jensen has great sound, you should probably have shopped around a little more before you bought it. Every Jensen I've ever heard sounds like someone is scraping a fork across the speakers. Jensen makes hands down some of the worst in-head amplifiers I've ever seen, and using their pre-outs with a power amp is almost as bad. Do youself and the rest of us a favor, don't recommend Jensen electronics to anyone...ever. If people stop buying crappy electronics, manufacturers will be forced to start making decent gear. If you want a solidly build in-dash cd/mp3 player that has low THD and a good feature set for a reasonable price, check out the alpine CDA 7878 http://www.alpine1.com. This is by no means the only good cd/mp3 player out there, check out Eclipse, Nakamichi, or McIntosh and see if any of their pieces play mp3's. (McIntosh only makes one head unit and I doubt it plays mp3's, but it's worth a shot)

    --
    People are the problem, stop procreation now!
  219. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    What a surprise! An Apple end user product that SPECIFICALLY doesn't work with Linux! I never thought I'd see the day.

    Oh, grow up. It's Linux's fault for not properly supporting a well-documented file system that's been deployed for over 3 years now.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  220. Re:Ipod! - Format as UFS by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Thank god someone's finally working on it. I've been itching to do it myself for several years now, but I've just never had the free time to go digging for the documentation and to roll up my sleeves and code it.

    Good luck on it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  221. Old School Rio by Warren_Canuck · · Score: 1

    I've had a Diamond (now SonicBlue) Rio PMP500 for three years now and i love it! 64mb builtin with a 64mb capable smartcard slot on the back, not to mention the 48 hour battery life on 1 AA battery. Non-Diamond drivers for windows and linux let you upload and download music and files from the unit as well as upload your own fonts and startup animations to the device.

    I owned one of Creative's Nomad Jukeboxes but I sold it two days after I bought it, sluggish controls and horrible battery life. I'm just glad I got it for $89 CDN (gotta love it when Futureshop fscks up and shifts a decimal space).

  222. Corrections by evilviper · · Score: 2

    First off, I don't usually have XMMS pause between songs... Almost every MP3 I have has enough silence at the end and beginning to triger the marking of a track.

    Secondly, I would just like to mention that you can always go back and manually set track marks in any place you choose. That leads to the mian reason I use MiniDiscs.... Ability to mark, crop, rearage, delete, and essentially change tracks in just abut any way a person could think of. Very nice.

    I just hope some company has the foresight to develop an Audio MD-RW drive soon.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  223. My biggest beef is quality. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Really.. being able to copy music out of it? I couldn't care less really. I already *have* the music on the computer, from where I can copy it to my hearts content.

    My beef is quality. I made the mistake of buying an Exonion mp3 discman..... what utter shit.

    I mean, I had a listen in the store (to a cd). Sounded fine, great. Didn't think to check the mp3 playback.

    They have some low and hipass filters on their mp3 decoding... I tried out some test tones encoded to mp3 at various bitrates. Even at 256.. there was tons of sound that literally was just not there.. dead silence where there should have been sound. I can't for the life of me figure out why they did this. For the record, the same mp3's on my computer sounded great.

    So my biggest concern would be sound quality.

  224. Regarding MD & security & quality. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    First... they use lossy compress. Not so bad in and of itself, but when yo go from mp3 to MD, you decompress/recompress using another compression method (Sony ATRAC I think). So you end up losing even more than you would with the mp3 alone.
    Secondly, though many players have digital output, a digital to digital copy between MD players still involves decompress/recompress (The digital output is usually standard SPDIF).. and only expensive decks, I think, let you do actual raw digital copies of minidisc.

    All in all, MD is great, except for the quality issues.
    I wish Sony had released ( and marketed) a disc-drive for the computer based on MD. I know they existed.. but one compatable with the MD format would have made a huge difference.

  225. Mp3 Players Iomega HipZip! by Dragon's-Maw · · Score: 1

    Sure it vibrates and it can be noisy in the library (though not rivaling the sound of air conditioning) but Windows will treat as a removable drive with full read write abilities. Media is cheap too, $50 Cdn. for 2 40 MB disks. Gotta love it.

    --
    Large animal tranquilizer, you're my only friend.
  226. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a thought, but do you have a OHCI chip?

    I had a PC Card Firewire card that wasn't OHCI. Took me a while to figure this out. Ditched the Lynx chipset card for a new one and I had no more issues.

  227. No offense but don't even get me started on MD by jstockdale · · Score: 1

    * MD only attains the long play features by increasing the compression ratio that the ATRAC algorithm is processing the audio to, inheriently losing audio quailty. The actual capacity of MD discs has not changed from the original spec somewhere around 150MB eqiv.

    * MD prohibits copies from being made from copies, using a original and copy permitted bit set on the disc. Incidentally no consumer recording hardware (to my knowledge) allows you to mess around with these settings, so your never gonna beable to make a second backup when your original disc goes missing.

    * That great Digital I/O feature that MD people love because it allows them to maintain the audio quality bit for bit in transferring between MD devices and MD to Comp utilizes a uncompressed data stream, to maintain compatability (I assume) with other similarly equipped devices. Unfortunately this is where that ATRAC lossy algorithm shows a weakness because it is only preserved within the MD player, and must be decompressed and recompressed when transfered. This introduces inherient artifacts which depending on how picky the listener is, can be heard. (Yes, mp3 uses lossy compression as well and I am not arguing that it uses better technology that ATRAC (I refuse to go there) however, because mp3 device archetecture is such that only one compression decompression cycle is performed, the compression artifacts are less severe for they do not build up.

    * MD Computer data drives arn't compatable with MD Audio disks. Very few computer audio recorders exist (to protect from illegal copying I assume). Sayonara to mastering a MD properly.

    Now I admit that mp3 has many weaknesses in its current form as well, such as devices placing pauses in between tracks, and copyright protection being introduced. But the point is the medium itself (data storage of mp3's) lacks these inherient flaws introduced by the MD designers, which in the process of preventing some copying, prohibit free use. The flaws of mp3 players can be overcome by anyone willing to undertake the task.

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:No offense but don't even get me started on MD by ziffie · · Score: 1
      Those are definitely some valid concerns, and MDs are not for everyone. I think that the fact that MDs are only ~150mbs is a testament to how amazing ATRAC has become. As I mentioned in my first post, even at 2x compression, for the average listener, the fidelity is more than adequate. As for copies of copies, I have never encountered a real need to do this. For people who want to use such a device to trade music, MDs aren't really that useful -- unless you give them the MD and make a second from the original audio source. Another possibility is recording at 1x and recording the tracks as .wavs to make 'masters'. If i bootlegged concerts, that is probably what i would do. Until mp3 players get smaller, more power efficient, real time recording/compressing and much much cheaper (and don't require harddrives), I think MDs are a nice alternative for the average music enthusiast. If i did buy an mp3 player, it'd definitely be a CD based device.

      cheers.

      --

      ---
      "Colors blind the eye
      Desires wither the heart."
      -- Lao Tsu, "Tao Te Ching"
  228. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe P1394 (e.g. firewire, ilink) use SCSI commands on the bus. Each device has it own SCSI interface to convert btw the SCSI commands and its own hardware, therefore a device at one end doesn't really need to know what 'filesystem' a device on the other end is really using.

  229. Re:Rio 500 sensitivity fix in parent! by duckie13 · · Score: 1

    Woo! That did the trick perfectly. Even after tapping it a little, it doesn't reset anymore (well hitting it by the USB connection does, but that was in one specific spot, and it probly shouldn't be hit there anyways :P ). Thanks alot A.C.!

    --
    "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
  230. Recording MD helps with a high bit rate MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very subjective discussion, and to make a flat statement that MP3's recorded onto MD don't make for a good solution, is selling the process a bit short.

    I routinely play MP3's and record them onto MD, with excellent results. I rip at 192kbps, and the sound is never compromised. MP3 enhances what the human ear can decode, and MD removes what it cannot percieve. If your results are less than satisfactory, you might want to consider ripping at a higher rate. As for quality, it is very high, in my opinion. It's a poor man that blames his tools.

    See the link above for a page that covers using iTunes to record onto MD.

  231. RioVolt. Its a CD MP3 player, reads CD-R & CD by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1
    What more can I say? If you are a computer geek, you already have a CD Burner, and thats all you need with this guy.

    It reads CD-R & CD-RW, only limitation is 255 songs, most of my CD's completely full take up about 200 songs (4-5 minutes each song)

    RIO VOLT Player

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  232. mod off topic please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is unlikely that anyone is going to read this since as soon as I post it it will be modded down but....


    In the age of cheap cd players and burners what the hell is the point of having an mp3 player at all. I mean aren't you just spending a hell of a lot of money for no real good reasion.


    No doubt this post will be followed up by a million people argueing bout endurance or portablity, but I feel that the fact remaines that mp3 players are simply vanity items for geeks.

  233. MInidisc - now with USB support .. by jail · · Score: 1

    http://www.minidisc.org/translations/sony_mzn1/

    Before you jump at Minidisc, consider waiting to march 2002 - I know I do ..

    The new models overcomes the last problem with the MD, recording time - and let's you transfer the mp3's directly from your computer to the MD unit - very handy :-)

    Just a thought.

  234. des by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ftp://Anonymous:Anonymous@ps2.dyns.cx/

    not logged in. You can login now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account. Posts without proper registration are posted as Anonymous Coward

  235. Possible alternative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe try this one:
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/electronics/5784. sh tml

  236. incentives for manufacturers by karji · · Score: 1

    I wonder why an MP3-player manufacturer would implement SDMI in its products, since a non-SDMI model would sell more units.

    Alex

  237. Archos Jukebox Studio 20 MP3 Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have one of these:
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/electronics/5784. sh tml

    and it acts as a USB hard drive; Great.

  238. If you want quality music... by bpdlr · · Score: 1

    ...get the Compaq-designed Personal Jukebox. The price tag is high because the sound quality is the best on the market. And a new driver now allows you to copy files (any files) from the PJB back to your PC. With a choice of 6GB and 20GB drives, an intuitive interface, and OPEN SOURCE software, what more could a true geek want? ;-)

    --

    --
    Barry de la Rosa,
    public[at]bpdlr.org
    My /. ID is lower than Bruce Perens'!

  239. Re:Ipod! - not so fast there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod uses HSF+ because it was designed to be used with macs. It's as simple as that - the iPod is the first in a series of devices which are all centred around the MacOS, aimed at selling more computers.

  240. Don't use an MP3 player! by sbryant · · Score: 1

    Go with MiniDisc. Even the portable MD players have optical in. There are soundcards available with optical I/O, which enables you to record onto MD digitally. (Lots of HiFi CD players have optical out now, so you can use that if your CD-ROM can't play a CD.)

    If you want to record MD -> PC digitally, you'll need a MD player with digital out, but these are readily available (often with both optical and co-ax).

    You can get a MD/Radio for your car. Some are expensive (eg: DM1500 or $750), but there are others (eg: the Kenwood for DM450). The disks are smaller than cassettes and aren't that expensive. I can get a pack of 5 74Min Sony disks for DM15 ($7.50).

    BTW: I recently got the Sony CD/MD combo which will record CD->MD at 4x speed. Works very nicely. Tip for anyone in Germany: it was cheaper at www.thomann.de.

    -- Steve

  241. Casio PZ-5000 by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    This is a good unit. I encode my MP3's with LAME (-r3mix -b112) VBR. The time goes wacky (it looks like you're speeding through the MP3) on the display, but what is actually played is accurate. Combine this with my Total Airhead and Etymotic ER4S cans -- it rocks!

  242. Re:RioVolt. Its a CD MP3 player, reads CD-R & by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    There is supposed to be an upcoming firmware revision that will take this to 999. OTH, my Casio PZ-5000 has something like a 150 song limitation. I doubt I'll hit that as I use LAME VBR with -r3mix -b112.

  243. I Blew it! Correction!!! by toupsie · · Score: 2
    I dropped the hidden directory "iPod_Control" from the list. Its an "invisible" directory to the Mac OS X Finder. So the correct command would be:

    cp -R /Volumes/[iPod Name]/iPod_Control/Music/* ~/Music

    Sorry about that...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  244. Very good point. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I wasn't insinuating that MD is not a good option.. I like MD...

    I guess my point is that people seem to be using the fact that you can copy to/from the MD without restriction as a reason that it is 'better' than an SDMI player.

    For something to stick tunes on to listen to, MD is great. So are many SDMI players.

    Err.. also, where ar eyou getting this about mp3 'enhancing what the human ear can decode' and md 'removing what you can't hear'.
    That sounds wrong to me.. do you have a url or something explaining it? The 'removing what you can't hear' I know is true.. but where's this enhancing?

    But if you were to do serial copying to and from an MD player, you will continually degrade the quality of the music (unless you are doing pure raw digital copies, only possible with certain dual-disc players, a digital spdif cable won't suffice, as that involves decompress/recompress).

  245. iPod Games, Hacks... by ablair · · Score: 1
    Has anyone else noticed the explosion of articles in the press on the iPod lately? The reviews on it have been near-universally favourable:

    C|net Editor's Choice

    New York Times Review

    Business Week Sweet Music

    Wall Street Journal Review

    LA Times Review

    PC Magazine 5/5 Rating

    But more to the point, who has played the cell-phone style hidden game on the iPod? With new hacking sites popping up all over, has anyone found a firmware update that gives them any more games yet? Or playback of even more media formats or other abilities? Of couse it will soon have Windows compatibility and people have been booting off their iPods since the beginning, but lately I've seen someone modifying it for use as a simple address book, people trying to get it to work under *BSD and Linux, and development of a new graphic EQ for it. Anyone else made cool hacks?

  246. CD based players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot CD based players for below US$ 100.

    I got the ID3 Superstar from Lik Sang.
    http://www.lik-sang.com/?click=cat-122-link

    I found it through MP3.com, here is the link:

    http://hardware.mp3.com/hardware/individual/3805 .h tml

    anti

  247. Bwahahahaaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a free country, see, there is just not market for these sort of devices! Bwhaahahahaa! Suck my Dick, I am King, the Right-Sized Bribe rules the world!

  248. Re:general purpose programmable hardware not allow by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

    They can ban it, they probably could not get rid of it, but they could certainly ban it. Think drugs...

    But computers are one of the key strategic sectors of the American economy. Drugs (though very popular) are not.

    Banning drugs is a ridiculous idea, but it's no real threat to US power. Banning computers on the other hand would destroy the US economy. It's in the nature of computers to be "general purpose" - ban that and you're back to having dedicated word-processors, teletype machines for email, radios for music, magazines for things like /. ... and while the US went down the tubes, the rest of the world would watch in utter disbelief. That's why I can't believe it could ever happen.

  249. Re: An alternative to MP3 Players Already Exists by __aawwih8715 · · Score: 1


    There are ways around getting older sony things while screwing sony at the same time.

    You can get a used, 5-disc sony ES (the good stuff) cd changer now for not so much. Instead of giving sony your money for the cd player, just buy it from somebody else. That way sony is losing the money you would have spent on their cd player and you help out somebody else.

    Secondly, if you feel strongly about sony, don't support their Super Audio CD effort. If the same holds true to their SACD effor as does their cd effort, please let Sound & Vision know, as they are feverishly watching this whole copy protection thing and are opposed to it.

    As far as making a recording of a recording that you buy, it is perfectly legal per the Home Recording Act.

    If you do tell Sound & Vision, please let me know what happens, as i will be very intereted.

    Thanks.

    -Mike