To speak directly to your account name: Yes, 'Visualize Whirled Peas' if you wish, but we don't care nor do we need to hear about your virtue signaling.
You could just look at the temperature trend for the last 50 years. That doesn't require faith in models, groupthink, nor appeal to authority. http://www.woodfortrees.org/pl...
Now, put on your big boy pants and go find a way to be nicer to Mother Nature. It'd be far more productive for you to help than it is for you to sit and complain.
Depends on what cryptocurrency they are mining, how suitable the Pi is for that, and what the value of that currency is.
Take bitcoin for example. One PI can do about 0.2 Mhash/second. A botnet consisting of 1 million devices can mine about $6.50 in a month. And you don't even get to keep all that, because a million devices mining will produce a great deal of very small transactions, which take up a lot of space in the blockchain, and you'll have to pay quite a large transaction fee. You'd be lucky to keep half of that money.
Instead of the developing the malware, you could make more money as a Walmart greeter.
In the real world, people just buy a set of knives from Lidl, rent a van, and discuss the plans in someone's living room. Banning encryption isn't going to stop any of that.
providing an appearance of intelligence by eventually getting things right via brute force matching.
That's all we need. That's how our brains evolved. We have 20 billion neurons in our cerebral cortex, with thousands of connections per neuron. That's also brute forcing. The appearance of intelligence will get better and better as we find better algorithms, and bigger networks.
Actually I suspect we may find that the best approach is by cheating with a bit of biology. We may find it easier to grow our own biological neurons that map themselves than trying to figure out what a brain does and emulate it with electronic circuits
Doubtful. Biological neurons are slow and inflexible. Artificial neural nets can already outperform human brains on various subtasks, and it's much easier to experiment with different network parameters in software. Looking at real brains is useful to learn some new tricks, but it's unlikely that brains have the perfect implementation for the task, given the huge constraints given to them by nature.
My suggestion is to get at least 3 PhDs
I would pick one, and work together with people who have the other 2.
If you want to be at the forefront of AI you should first invent it and to do that, you need to define intelligence and individualism. I think brain research would be your field to try.
Before you try to invent anything, you should first learn the stuff that's already out there that others are working on.
If you want to go into commercial AI, make an app
Most AI requires more computation that fits in an app.
That's like saying, "there's no story, just a book full of letters", or "there's no intelligence, just a skull full of chemicals", or "there's no weather forecast, just computers running code".
All we have are systems with an ever increasing number of if statements.
You must be completely unaware of what's happening in the field, if you believe that. Here's an example of how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Slashdot Mirror
To speak directly to your account name: Yes, 'Visualize Whirled Peas' if you wish, but we don't care nor do we need to hear about your virtue signaling.
Wrong on both accounts, but keep going.
You could just look at the temperature trend for the last 50 years. That doesn't require faith in models, groupthink, nor appeal to authority. http://www.woodfortrees.org/pl...
Not believing people who are trying to sell you something is a basic survival skill.
There are plenty of people trying to sell the idea that AGW isn't happening.
Still not answering the question, I see.
I wasn't talking about me or you, but about "others". How many of them have studied the models in detail ?
In fact, you don't know. You're taking it on faith. Others choose not to.
Others choose not to, based on faith, or because they have studied the models in detail ?
https://ask.slashdot.org/story...
Now, put on your big boy pants and go find a way to be nicer to Mother Nature. It'd be far more productive for you to help than it is for you to sit and complain.
You don't think someone could do both ?
What if the algorithm makes a copywritten artwork? Who do you sue?
The company that makes it. Of course, damages will be small, since there's only one jar for each pattern.
1677216 unique pixels. Colour me unimpressed.
What's the hex code for 'unimpressed' ?
10 H/s of XMR yields about $1.10 per day [cryptocompare.com].
I'm only getting $1.05 per month, using 1W power consumption.
Or better yet, protest but don't break the law...
What if you didn't, but other people in the protest did ?
Depends on what cryptocurrency they are mining, how suitable the Pi is for that, and what the value of that currency is.
Take bitcoin for example. One PI can do about 0.2 Mhash/second. A botnet consisting of 1 million devices can mine about $6.50 in a month. And you don't even get to keep all that, because a million devices mining will produce a great deal of very small transactions, which take up a lot of space in the blockchain, and you'll have to pay quite a large transaction fee. You'd be lucky to keep half of that money.
Instead of the developing the malware, you could make more money as a Walmart greeter.
You, as many people, are assuming that she's getting this wrong through stupidity
I'm sure she's stupid either way, even if she has sinister plans.
In the real world, people just buy a set of knives from Lidl, rent a van, and discuss the plans in someone's living room. Banning encryption isn't going to stop any of that.
So multiplication of 16 bit matrices is AI?
Just as much as connecting 3 neurons together is I.
providing an appearance of intelligence by eventually getting things right via brute force matching.
That's all we need. That's how our brains evolved. We have 20 billion neurons in our cerebral cortex, with thousands of connections per neuron. That's also brute forcing. The appearance of intelligence will get better and better as we find better algorithms, and bigger networks.
Actually I suspect we may find that the best approach is by cheating with a bit of biology. We may find it easier to grow our own biological neurons that map themselves than trying to figure out what a brain does and emulate it with electronic circuits
Doubtful. Biological neurons are slow and inflexible. Artificial neural nets can already outperform human brains on various subtasks, and it's much easier to experiment with different network parameters in software. Looking at real brains is useful to learn some new tricks, but it's unlikely that brains have the perfect implementation for the task, given the huge constraints given to them by nature.
My suggestion is to get at least 3 PhDs
I would pick one, and work together with people who have the other 2.
If you want to be at the forefront of AI you should first invent it and to do that, you need to define intelligence and individualism. I think brain research would be your field to try.
Before you try to invent anything, you should first learn the stuff that's already out there that others are working on.
If you want to go into commercial AI, make an app
Most AI requires more computation that fits in an app.
That's like saying, "there's no story, just a book full of letters", or "there's no intelligence, just a skull full of chemicals", or "there's no weather forecast, just computers running code".
All we have are systems with an ever increasing number of if statements.
You must be completely unaware of what's happening in the field, if you believe that. Here's an example of how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Designing and training a deep ANN is a lot harder than learning how to edit HTML
Sounds like a perfect job for AI.
Port-to-port self navigating ships is a bit more involved than running a simple autopilot.
Home Blood Pressure Monitors Are Wrong 70 Percent of the Time, Says Study
So, take 10 measurements, and look for the 3 identical ones.
Yes, it's a good thing that planes with human pilots cannot be manipulated to fly into buildings or mountains.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...