This is a serious problem. The entire discussion in this article is circular auto-gratification. Why exactly is it in your interest to make fun of North Korea? How exactly do you know North Korea exists to destroy everything you know and love? Why exactly is it so easy for you to be convinced of such things?
To be blunt: how exactly is it that you are so stupid to believe anything other the fact that North Korea gets a bad image in our media solely because the US lost a war to it and the interests of some astronomically wealthy businessmen suffered? How are you so stupid that you accept this opinion that has been slid into you mind exploiting the weakness of you wanting to fit in?
"OH YEAHHHHHH A NORTH KOREA STORY NOW I CAN REALLY SHOW THAT I FIT IN AND MAKE SOME GOOD JOKES AT NORTH KOREA'S EXPENSE AHAHHAHA TIME TO GET SWEET MOD POINTS FOR GOING WITH THE FLOW"
A country of incompetents or a determined country that has independently developed many technologies despite half the world shunning it: pick one.
Aren't you nerds supposed to be smart or something? Shame.
This is not a kindly little old service that helps you find things that are important to you.
This is an extremely malicious program to shape your point of view by enticing you with items that are scientifically proven to stimulate you and then associating those items with other items that promote an agenda that is against your interests.
This is literally some faceless entity telling you to your face that it has the power to decide what you like and that you will agree. What is to stop them from inserting suggestive material into your feed? How can you account for the affect such things would have on your point of view? Self awareness and thoughtless stimulation cannot exist together. Guess which one helps you get what you want and need out of life in the long run?
Not that this specific change in this specific service is particularly important, but it is a clear sign of what role the internet plays in most peoples' lives.
I see stories like this every day, and nothing bad has happened to ME yet! I guess it's no big threat. I guess I really don't need to defend myself or my family! Everything is bad, but it's not THAT bad!
This is seriously what you are supposed to think because of this bombardment of little stories skirting around the real issue: The government is the agent of a total surveillance program that is a threat to the very lives of almost every man woman and child on the planet.
Why are you assuming that anyone who would take justice into their own hands is deranged? Because of a programmed response. What is the point of commenting if you aren't taking this opportunity to flesh out your ideas of morality? Is this just some kind of morbid entertainment to you?
What about the possibility of the law protecting injustice? When is it justified to take life in general?
There is a severe lack of critical thought on your part.
Get a grip, man! Assuming you are a man at all and not some kind of artificial intelligence shill.
That show is a propaganda device to condition people's responses to various circumstances they may encounter in the "software development industry" to weaken their position to facilitate their absorption by big entities. The industry is just a hunting ground, a game park more like.
It's as simple as this: the demographics of Game of Thrones watchers were presented privately to the industry and they wanted to produce a show to tail GoT that would condition coder-drones to be more compliant.
Seriously that show celebrates critical flaws of character and insane business decisions somehow working out in some kind of silver-lined fantasy world. It's pure poison. But hey, we all know what HBO really stands for.
Is it justifiable to take the life of some one who is guilty of destroying your livelihood?
Or we could just rant and rave about an issue in which the facts are purposefully being withheld and censored by the government to give the media time to spin this the right way (it's not a white shooter this time after all)
Your literal romanticisation of the present circumstances is really just fantasy. Really, be a little embarrassed. Most of what you say is true, but the last part is not excusable. It's just false.
There is no political competition. There is no democracy. What the voters' opinions on policy does not directly influence policy. Their opinions are used solely to work around their objections without addressing them if at all possible. The presidency is not a position of power as you imply. It's simply the job of acting as the face of the government to the stupid masses.
And what part of the criminalization of dissent, the militarization of the police, and the automation of the military makes you think the powers that be haven't anticipated the possibility of mass riots and are ready to mow down everyone who takes issue?
what is not healthy is combining it with a significant proportion of calories from carbohydrates and also consuming unnatural forms of lard such as produced by animals fed naturally-bizarre combinations of nutrients (read: grain)
the sets of hormones related to the metabolizing lipids and carbohydrates in large amounts are completely at odds. for example, insulin greatly inhibits the production of lipases
and anyway people are not built for eating grains in general.
It seems like a crisis with antibiotics was planned. It's a problem with "side-effects" of hygiene as much as bacterial evolution, and our immune systems are kept weak not only from "hygenic" practices but from the lack of exercise resulting from unnecessary antibiotic use. Perhaps the antibiotic resistant crisis was engineered to ease the pressure on society of having so much surplus "labor resources".
"Hygiene" was originally necessary to keep up economic efficiency in cities where different ethnic groups were co-mingling by keeping them from infecting each other with each others' germs and to stop them from getting at each others' throats for smelling differently. The solution was simply to burn the flora off the skin completely (with lye soap, chlorine, et c.), which eventually results in extinctions in the digestive tract, respiratory system, and the rest of the body. Simply put, there is supposed to be a circular relationship between all of your natural flora that is completely disrupted by "hygiene". Yes. The flora from your feces is supposed to spread on your skin and into your mouth and nose and eyes and ears. Not only your own, but that of the people around you. The only time this becomes a problem is when people get too crowded and the system of flora gets overwhelmed with too many variants. Especially when many different people with quite different populations of flora from different lands and ways of life meet up.
This has all been well-understood for a long time; for some aspects even since ancient times. Absolutely none of this is mysterious to any ranking health official. The implications of all of this seem quite predictable. People will get sick. Not just once in a while, but chronically. This will become more and more pervasive as generations go on and more and more species of flora are extincted. Meanwhile we are given antibiotics.
Evil is hiding in the "muddled" issues. More often than not some one knows exactly the truth of the matter and is using it to control everyone who doesn't know. This is the nature of our form of civilization. Probably about time to put an end to it, or accept your extinction.
This TOTALLY makes up for the all-encompassing digital surveillance throughout the western world that is a pneumatic nail gun hammering our coffin shut forever
The people, especially whites, are being punished for the failed social doctrine to which they have been subject. They are too hard to please; they need more resources to do work than immigrants from the third world. They expect a quality of life that "they don't deserve" according to our leaders and people who don't have any real problems in their lives in general ("they're not me so fuck them" syndrome).
The situation boils down to the simple fact that we have incompetent leaders that are incapable of mobilizing our human resources because they live in a bubble and can't relate to anything they don't have first-hand experience in, which is not much. They are used to having people do all of that for them, but their social doctrine has seen that all of those people have disappeared. They've milked the cow too dry: the worst aspect is that the world wars damaged the population severely by disrupting the traditional transference of knowledge, habit, and experience; too many kids grew up without fathers and the media failed to pick up the pieces.
If throwing money at the problem by making an exaggerated effort to solve it with whatever devices happen to be lying around doesn't work immediately, as was the case with the media, our leaders find the problem to be impossibly difficult to solve. The quality of true innovation has escaped them from generation after generation of soft living; they completely rely on others that they can entice with wealth to do everything for them. They have inherited a system that they very barely can keep track of and have completely forgotten how it was made. They have lost the characteristics that allowed their ancestors to make it to begin with.
If they can't solve the puzzle, then, like the spoiled rotten idiot children they are, they start attacking it. See: the recent "recession". It is simply the rich robbing everyone who isn't working in the industries with the most growth. Squeezing people dry until there's nothing left to shed but their very lives. This ensures that people are living day-to-day and cannot organize to do something to help themselves (against their leaders' interests), like enact a revolution (like the German Third Reich).
Disclosure cannot be instantaneous and automatic. It must be the result of the acting will of a person for each and every case. The only way to prove that it was an act of the person's will is for a pause in which the person can choose to act in such a way as to prevent the disclosure.
The argument that a person could stop what they are doing and turn off their phone at any given point is not relevant.
The telephone company is, by the implication of the contract with the customer, party to the customer.
This is a perversion of law and a worse offense to justice.
Take this opportunity to realize that by passivity the general population has given up the very objectivity of their perception and thereby the god-given rights of they themselves and everyone else. The judicial system is a rabid dog that is sicced on anyone competing against the interests of the dominant economic entities.
Slashdot Mirror
This is a serious problem. The entire discussion in this article is circular auto-gratification. Why exactly is it in your interest to make fun of North Korea?
How exactly do you know North Korea exists to destroy everything you know and love? Why exactly is it so easy for you to be convinced of such things?
To be blunt: how exactly is it that you are so stupid to believe anything other the fact that North Korea gets a bad image in our media solely because the US lost a war to it and the interests of some astronomically wealthy businessmen suffered? How are you so stupid that you accept this opinion that has been slid into you mind exploiting the weakness of you wanting to fit in?
"OH YEAHHHHHH A NORTH KOREA STORY NOW I CAN REALLY SHOW THAT I FIT IN AND MAKE SOME GOOD JOKES AT NORTH KOREA'S EXPENSE AHAHHAHA TIME TO GET SWEET MOD POINTS FOR GOING WITH THE FLOW"
A country of incompetents or a determined country that has independently developed many technologies despite half the world shunning it: pick one.
Aren't you nerds supposed to be smart or something? Shame.
This is not a kindly little old service that helps you find things that are important to you.
This is an extremely malicious program to shape your point of view by enticing you with items that are scientifically proven to stimulate you and then associating those items with other items that promote an agenda that is against your interests.
This is literally some faceless entity telling you to your face that it has the power to decide what you like and that you will agree.
What is to stop them from inserting suggestive material into your feed? How can you account for the affect such things would have on your point of view?
Self awareness and thoughtless stimulation cannot exist together. Guess which one helps you get what you want and need out of life in the long run?
Not that this specific change in this specific service is particularly important, but it is a clear sign of what role the internet plays in most peoples' lives.
I see stories like this every day, and nothing bad has happened to ME yet!
I guess it's no big threat. I guess I really don't need to defend myself or my family! Everything is bad, but it's not THAT bad!
This is seriously what you are supposed to think because of this bombardment of little stories skirting around the real issue:
The government is the agent of a total surveillance program that is a threat to the very lives of almost every man woman and child on the planet.
Define "mental health". Everyone who says things like you said has no understanding of sanity or objectivity or of life at all for that matter.
"A conclusion we came to was wrong because we jumped to it for no reason"
Why are you assuming that anyone who would take justice into their own hands is deranged?
Because of a programmed response. What is the point of commenting if you aren't taking this opportunity to flesh out your ideas of morality? Is this just some kind of morbid entertainment to you?
What about the possibility of the law protecting injustice?
When is it justified to take life in general?
There is a severe lack of critical thought on your part.
Gina's ink....something to do with tampons????
Get a grip, man! Assuming you are a man at all and not some kind of artificial intelligence shill.
That show is a propaganda device to condition people's responses to various circumstances they may encounter in the "software development industry" to weaken their position to facilitate their absorption by big entities. The industry is just a hunting ground, a game park more like.
It's as simple as this: the demographics of Game of Thrones watchers were presented privately to the industry and they wanted to produce a show to tail GoT that would condition coder-drones to be more compliant.
Seriously that show celebrates critical flaws of character and insane business decisions somehow working out in some kind of silver-lined fantasy world. It's pure poison. But hey, we all know what HBO really stands for.
It is manifesting in new forms rapidly!
Cue up the firebombs
Is it justifiable to take the life of some one who is guilty of destroying your livelihood?
Or we could just rant and rave about an issue in which the facts are purposefully being withheld and censored by the government to give the media time to spin this the right way (it's not a white shooter this time after all)
Actually it seems as though he knew exactly how to deal with the loss
You're a real moron. Go waste in front of a TV and stop bothering us
Is the lunatic we're dealing with here YOU?
What on earth exactly is the value of your subjective judgements in this case?
What is your goal? What is the point?
Hey look everyone, it's the site owner's agenda being promoted "anonymously"
JOHN MCCLANE
Your literal romanticisation of the present circumstances is really just fantasy. Really, be a little embarrassed. Most of what you say is true, but the last part is not excusable. It's just false.
There is no political competition. There is no democracy. What the voters' opinions on policy does not directly influence policy. Their opinions are used solely to work around their objections without addressing them if at all possible.
The presidency is not a position of power as you imply. It's simply the job of acting as the face of the government to the stupid masses.
And what part of the criminalization of dissent, the militarization of the police, and the automation of the military makes you think the powers that be haven't anticipated the possibility of mass riots and are ready to mow down everyone who takes issue?
You are addressing billionaires and the government as separate entities.
You are being quite stupid to say the very least.
It's not a joke. Have some respect for your own history, if not for your own body and for the health of your children.
lard is perfectly healthy
what is not healthy is combining it with a significant proportion of calories from carbohydrates
and also consuming unnatural forms of lard such as produced by animals fed naturally-bizarre combinations of nutrients (read: grain)
the sets of hormones related to the metabolizing lipids and carbohydrates in large amounts are completely at odds.
for example, insulin greatly inhibits the production of lipases
and anyway people are not built for eating grains in general.
It seems like a crisis with antibiotics was planned. It's a problem with "side-effects" of hygiene as much as bacterial evolution, and our immune systems are kept weak not only from "hygenic" practices but from the lack of exercise resulting from unnecessary antibiotic use.
Perhaps the antibiotic resistant crisis was engineered to ease the pressure on society of having so much surplus "labor resources".
"Hygiene" was originally necessary to keep up economic efficiency in cities where different ethnic groups were co-mingling by keeping them from infecting each other with each others' germs and to stop them from getting at each others' throats for smelling differently.
The solution was simply to burn the flora off the skin completely (with lye soap, chlorine, et c.), which eventually results in extinctions in the digestive tract, respiratory system, and the rest of the body.
Simply put, there is supposed to be a circular relationship between all of your natural flora that is completely disrupted by "hygiene". Yes. The flora from your feces is supposed to spread on your skin and into your mouth and nose and eyes and ears. Not only your own, but that of the people around you.
The only time this becomes a problem is when people get too crowded and the system of flora gets overwhelmed with too many variants. Especially when many different people with quite different populations of flora from different lands and ways of life meet up.
This has all been well-understood for a long time; for some aspects even since ancient times. Absolutely none of this is mysterious to any ranking health official.
The implications of all of this seem quite predictable. People will get sick. Not just once in a while, but chronically. This will become more and more pervasive as generations go on and more and more species of flora are extincted.
Meanwhile we are given antibiotics.
Evil is hiding in the "muddled" issues. More often than not some one knows exactly the truth of the matter and is using it to control everyone who doesn't know. This is the nature of our form of civilization. Probably about time to put an end to it, or accept your extinction.
This TOTALLY makes up for the all-encompassing digital surveillance throughout the western world that is a pneumatic nail gun hammering our coffin shut forever
The people, especially whites, are being punished for the failed social doctrine to which they have been subject. They are too hard to please; they need more resources to do work than immigrants from the third world. They expect a quality of life that "they don't deserve" according to our leaders and people who don't have any real problems in their lives in general ("they're not me so fuck them" syndrome).
The situation boils down to the simple fact that we have incompetent leaders that are incapable of mobilizing our human resources because they live in a bubble and can't relate to anything they don't have first-hand experience in, which is not much. They are used to having people do all of that for them, but their social doctrine has seen that all of those people have disappeared.
They've milked the cow too dry: the worst aspect is that the world wars damaged the population severely by disrupting the traditional transference of knowledge, habit, and experience; too many kids grew up without fathers and the media failed to pick up the pieces.
If throwing money at the problem by making an exaggerated effort to solve it with whatever devices happen to be lying around doesn't work immediately, as was the case with the media, our leaders find the problem to be impossibly difficult to solve. The quality of true innovation has escaped them from generation after generation of soft living; they completely rely on others that they can entice with wealth to do everything for them. They have inherited a system that they very barely can keep track of and have completely forgotten how it was made. They have lost the characteristics that allowed their ancestors to make it to begin with.
If they can't solve the puzzle, then, like the spoiled rotten idiot children they are, they start attacking it. See: the recent "recession". It is simply the rich robbing everyone who isn't working in the industries with the most growth. Squeezing people dry until there's nothing left to shed but their very lives. This ensures that people are living day-to-day and cannot organize to do something to help themselves (against their leaders' interests), like enact a revolution (like the German Third Reich).
because it's not about doing justice in general let alone in those specific cases
it's about battering down our rights without most of us noticing
Exactly correct.
Disclosure cannot be instantaneous and automatic. It must be the result of the acting will of a person for each and every case. The only way to prove that it was an act of the person's will is for a pause in which the person can choose to act in such a way as to prevent the disclosure.
The argument that a person could stop what they are doing and turn off their phone at any given point is not relevant.
The telephone company is, by the implication of the contract with the customer, party to the customer.
This is a perversion of law and a worse offense to justice.
Take this opportunity to realize that by passivity the general population has given up the very objectivity of their perception and thereby the god-given rights of they themselves and everyone else. The judicial system is a rabid dog that is sicced on anyone competing against the interests of the dominant economic entities.