They do, because most cyclists also own cars and pay taxes. ie use the same logic as footpaths, do you expect pedestrians to be registered too? What about pets, does my dog need to be registered to walk on the path?
The problem is not cars, the problem is gas emissions.
Nope, the problem is cars. Your average car requires around 10m2 of land just to sit idle. Once that car moves, it needs at least another 30m2+ for safe operation. Multiple that by 10 million people in a large city and it simply does not scale. Buses, trains, bicycles, walking, pretty much every other mode of transport is much more efficient. So you are 100% wrong, the problem is exactly cars.
If you cater to the lowest common then you get everyone degenerated to that.
Every country has crap TV, the entire business model is built on lowest common denominator for advertising dollars . It is your choice whether you watch it or not.
Apparently, according to the F.A., this was "a thing" in the early 2000s.
Next of all, was it really "a thing"? I've been on cellular since 1996, and exclusively since 2002. I'd never heard of this thing until 2011, when I moved to China
I'm was in my 20's in the 90's and early 00's, and not only being a tech head was an engineer at ISP's and telco's during this time. I've never heard of it until last week when I had to call a marketing company and got some shit song ring sound which I hung up on immediately. This article is the second time in my life I knew this existed. So yeah I don't think's it's as 'incredibly trendy' as the summary makes out.
Most ecommerce sites I use have next day delivery, some even do offer same day delivery if you order early in the morning. I can't think of many things I need faster than that. Is this really a problem?
"Hate crime" means whatever the State decides it means at any given moment,
Er, that's not how the law works. If you are confused you can find the actual definition in black and white here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
And even if the 'state" decides one thing, it's up to a court and jury to decide. That's why we have courts.
Still, if his admittedly racially biased mass murder wasn't a "hate crime", the concept is irredeemably broken.
It's not irredeemably broken, since it can quite easily be redeemed by enforcing consistency in decisions.
But that's not really the point is it, you just wanted to have a little rant...
Facebook is one company. You have to use Facebook to interface with all the goings on, because almost everyone else is using their closed (but free) platform.
I deleted my FB account a few years ago and haven't missed it. My teenage kids don't use it either, it's all Snapchat these days.
So I'm sure there's a large chunk of people that still use it, but like top 40 radio who cares. That audience is completely irrelevant to most people I want to interact with.
The same people who told you Trump had a 2% chance of winning now give you his approval polls. Proceed accordingly.
Which is why you need to read the actual poll data, and not the headline attached to it. Of course this requires a high school level education which not everyone has...
This poll has the same bias as the ones that made all the mainstream medias look like idiots on election night.
The poll data was actually reflected in the results within the margin of error. The polls weren't wrong, the people who produce TV shows and newspapers for ratings simply interpreted them incorrectly.
The lesson from this is don't believe the headlines, go to the source.
As a good leader, you should man up and set the record straight with the truth. Even if it supposedly might put you at some imaginary risk of being prosecuted in court.
Like releasing you tax returns? Your version of logic is pathetic.
You mean despite winning the election, being a multi-billionaire, being a successful TV star, having a gorgeous wife who's also smart, raising well-mannered kids, and having a cohesive, loving family?
Well apart from the other two families he used to have and left behind you mean?
And while everyone is running around with their hair on fire over "covfefe" and his other tweets, he's been quietly getting his agenda done.
Right, like building the wall, banning muslims, NAFTA, Chinese currency manipulation, Prosecuting Hillary, Israel Embassy, Obamacare. Yep he's getting it all done...
For an example...
That's all you got? Trump has spent more time tweeting and playing golf than doing actual work. Keep up the effort though, you're doing your country proud.
If you don't see the FUD here, you are simply not looking.
It is neither FUD nor fake, it may be a little click baity, but nothing in there is false or alarming
Sensationalizing everything you dislike in a negative way is not "news", it's propaganda.
Neither was it sensational, nor was it everything. Your post is more FUD, Fake, Sensational and Propaganda than TFS. But I'm guessing the irony of that is lost on you...
Ok I RTFS and read your comment, but am still struggling to figure out what in this story fake?
It seems 'Fake News' now means the same as 'OMGZ the media are reporting things I don't like'. Isn't the appointing of a new FBI director including his relative experience newsworthy to you? Isn't the media job to just report things that are happening whether you like it or not?
Slashdot Mirror
Why shouldn't bicyclers pay their fair share?
They do, because most cyclists also own cars and pay taxes. ie use the same logic as footpaths, do you expect pedestrians to be registered too? What about pets, does my dog need to be registered to walk on the path?
Like this guy http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1164...
Take that lefties who own $200+ bikes with wheels larger than 26inches and live in Oregon. What goes around comes around.
FTFY...
The problem is not cars, the problem is gas emissions.
Nope, the problem is cars. Your average car requires around 10m2 of land just to sit idle. Once that car moves, it needs at least another 30m2+ for safe operation. Multiple that by 10 million people in a large city and it simply does not scale. Buses, trains, bicycles, walking, pretty much every other mode of transport is much more efficient. So you are 100% wrong, the problem is exactly cars.
Google Photos puts photos of my dog under the heading 'Cats'. And they want this AI to control cars on public roads?
If you cater to the lowest common then you get everyone degenerated to that.
Every country has crap TV, the entire business model is built on lowest common denominator for advertising dollars . It is your choice whether you watch it or not.
Apparently, according to the F.A., this was "a thing" in the early 2000s.
Next of all, was it really "a thing"? I've been on cellular since 1996, and exclusively since 2002. I'd never heard of this thing until 2011, when I moved to China
I'm was in my 20's in the 90's and early 00's, and not only being a tech head was an engineer at ISP's and telco's during this time. I've never heard of it until last week when I had to call a marketing company and got some shit song ring sound which I hung up on immediately. This article is the second time in my life I knew this existed. So yeah I don't think's it's as 'incredibly trendy' as the summary makes out.
Most ecommerce sites I use have next day delivery, some even do offer same day delivery if you order early in the morning. I can't think of many things I need faster than that. Is this really a problem?
Call Trump whatever else you will, but it's tough to call a guy who won the toughest race in American politics his first time out a "failure".
And yet here were are.
I hear they've set aside an entire wing just for Donald J Trump...
"Hate crime" means whatever the State decides it means at any given moment,
Er, that's not how the law works. If you are confused you can find the actual definition in black and white here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
And even if the 'state" decides one thing, it's up to a court and jury to decide. That's why we have courts.
Still, if his admittedly racially biased mass murder wasn't a "hate crime", the concept is irredeemably broken.
It's not irredeemably broken, since it can quite easily be redeemed by enforcing consistency in decisions.
But that's not really the point is it, you just wanted to have a little rant...
The overwhelming majority of people use Facebook.
2 Billion active user apparently, meaning 5 billion humans who don't use it. That's not a majority.
Facebook is one company. You have to use Facebook to interface with all the goings on, because almost everyone else is using their closed (but free) platform.
I deleted my FB account a few years ago and haven't missed it. My teenage kids don't use it either, it's all Snapchat these days. So I'm sure there's a large chunk of people that still use it, but like top 40 radio who cares. That audience is completely irrelevant to most people I want to interact with.
Yet you agree with me that it was "click baity" but not dishonest or disingenuous enough to be FUD. Plain old moronic.
Words have actual meanings. Come back when you learn how that works.
The same people who told you Trump had a 2% chance of winning now give you his approval polls. Proceed accordingly.
Which is why you need to read the actual poll data, and not the headline attached to it. Of course this requires a high school level education which not everyone has...
This poll has the same bias as the ones that made all the mainstream medias look like idiots on election night.
The poll data was actually reflected in the results within the margin of error. The polls weren't wrong, the people who produce TV shows and newspapers for ratings simply interpreted them incorrectly.
The lesson from this is don't believe the headlines, go to the source.
As a good leader, you should man up and set the record straight with the truth. Even if it supposedly might put you at some imaginary risk of being prosecuted in court.
Like releasing you tax returns? Your version of logic is pathetic.
You mean despite winning the election, being a multi-billionaire, being a successful TV star, having a gorgeous wife who's also smart, raising well-mannered kids, and having a cohesive, loving family?
Well apart from the other two families he used to have and left behind you mean?
And while everyone is running around with their hair on fire over "covfefe" and his other tweets, he's been quietly getting his agenda done.
Right, like building the wall, banning muslims, NAFTA, Chinese currency manipulation, Prosecuting Hillary, Israel Embassy, Obamacare. Yep he's getting it all done...
For an example...
That's all you got? Trump has spent more time tweeting and playing golf than doing actual work. Keep up the effort though, you're doing your country proud.
If you don't see the FUD here, you are simply not looking.
It is neither FUD nor fake, it may be a little click baity, but nothing in there is false or alarming
Sensationalizing everything you dislike in a negative way is not "news", it's propaganda.
Neither was it sensational, nor was it everything. Your post is more FUD, Fake, Sensational and Propaganda than TFS. But I'm guessing the irony of that is lost on you...
Nothing Trump has promised to do would be good for the country and quite a bit of his agenda will hurt a lot of people.
Everybody thinks...
I never made it past these two words. Seems like a waste of effort writing whatever it is you wrote next...
James Comey is also a Lawyer,
Ok I RTFS and read your comment, but am still struggling to figure out what in this story fake?
It seems 'Fake News' now means the same as 'OMGZ the media are reporting things I don't like'. Isn't the appointing of a new FBI director including his relative experience newsworthy to you? Isn't the media job to just report things that are happening whether you like it or not?
That's the name of the show, it was a series on debunking common myths
Anything by Louis Theroux