I believe I have smart terrain following turned off. My guess is that one of the "automagical" camera features along those lines is to blame.
I don't have any fancy camera options either. It usually happens when I'm flying and do a sharp turn to land in an enclosed area like a cave or building, but it's only happened two or three times.
I dualbox, with one character on/follow to the other most of the time, and occasionally the second character's camera ends up upside-down. I can't click through to the article due to work restrictions, but the cryptic clue made me think of this.
Oh, I see, you've written so many books there's no possible way you can remember them all to fill out a web form for each one.
So far, Google is the only company doing this. But what if another company starts doing this in China, another one in Russia, another one in South America, another one in South Africa, one in Israel, etc., how many web forms in how many languages are you prepared to fill in for each of your books? You go on from saying how simple it is to then say that other companies should be able to get into the same game, but you don't seem to have thought it through.
If the feedback mechanisms are synchronised then they might behave differently to if they are asynchronous. There might be subtleties in the feedback effects that only show up in an asynchronous environment. I don't know, it's just a suspicion, but the only way to demonstrate one way or the other is to try an asynchronous approach and see if the results differ significantly to a clocked digital simulation.
It's not software emulation, it's analog hardware with real-time asynchronous feedback. Also, I'm not sure that it will help with modelling real systems, as you can't pause and save and restore a real-time asynchronous system.
Sorry, how can you possibly link an aborted fetus to pornography?
Because it's grotesque. Pornography doesn't just mean sex, it also covers extreme violence. Basically it's anything that the mainstream find objectionable but some minority might find fascinating or exciting. For example, the photos of Princess Diana after the car crash are pornographic in the second meaning here.
Au contraire, Wikipedia usually stands like a rock and is not swayed in either direction. If something is included in good faith, then any attempt to remove it is treated harshly. On the other hand, if something that has been censored elsewhere is included purely in order to make a point about censorship, it is relentlessly removed despite any arguments that the includers make as to the material's relevance to the article. This case falls into the latter category. Wikipedia does not like to be used as a test case.
They have $3M in cash and $3M in property, so $6.5M isn't actually over-valuing them, the market is under-valuing them if that's a 100% premium over their market cap.
That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content.
It shouldn't go to court, it's a legitimate journalistic investigation. Ever heard of "chilling effect"? I'm astonished at the number of people in this forum advocating dragging journalists into court.
Well it's use of unauthorised computers for further unauthorised activity (unless they asked MS and Google first)...
As I've already said, you might be right on the first point but not the second, I don't need to ask Google or Microsoft's permission to send as many emails as I want to my own Gmail or Hotmail account.
Slashdot Mirror
If you mail something to me, unsolicited, it's mine.
Don't we just call them "links" nowadays?
This example muddies the waters, though, because the non-purchasers are using the company's server resources without having paid them any money.
Triple-boxer here... never had that happen to me.
I believe I have smart terrain following turned off. My guess is that one of the "automagical" camera features along those lines is to blame.
I don't have any fancy camera options either. It usually happens when I'm flying and do a sharp turn to land in an enclosed area like a cave or building, but it's only happened two or three times.
I dualbox, with one character on /follow to the other most of the time, and occasionally the second character's camera ends up upside-down. I can't click through to the article due to work restrictions, but the cryptic clue made me think of this.
Oh, I see, you've written so many books there's no possible way you can remember them all to fill out a web form for each one.
So far, Google is the only company doing this. But what if another company starts doing this in China, another one in Russia, another one in South America, another one in South Africa, one in Israel, etc., how many web forms in how many languages are you prepared to fill in for each of your books? You go on from saying how simple it is to then say that other companies should be able to get into the same game, but you don't seem to have thought it through.
This article reminded me of the book "An introduction to general systems thinking" by Gerald Weinberg. Wikipdia has an article on systems thinking.
Planks come in a variety of lengths, but there is only one Planck length
If the feedback mechanisms are synchronised then they might behave differently to if they are asynchronous. There might be subtleties in the feedback effects that only show up in an asynchronous environment. I don't know, it's just a suspicion, but the only way to demonstrate one way or the other is to try an asynchronous approach and see if the results differ significantly to a clocked digital simulation.
Mod parent up. Any Turing-complete computing device, given enough memory and storage, can replicate anything this hardware can do.
A digital system can never perfectly replicate an analog system, and a clock-driven system can never perfectly replicate an asynchronous system.
It's not software emulation, it's analog hardware with real-time asynchronous feedback. Also, I'm not sure that it will help with modelling real systems, as you can't pause and save and restore a real-time asynchronous system.
Oops I'm wrong, they left the link in there, my bad.
Sorry, how can you possibly link an aborted fetus to pornography?
Because it's grotesque. Pornography doesn't just mean sex, it also covers extreme violence. Basically it's anything that the mainstream find objectionable but some minority might find fascinating or exciting. For example, the photos of Princess Diana after the car crash are pornographic in the second meaning here.
Au contraire, Wikipedia usually stands like a rock and is not swayed in either direction. If something is included in good faith, then any attempt to remove it is treated harshly. On the other hand, if something that has been censored elsewhere is included purely in order to make a point about censorship, it is relentlessly removed despite any arguments that the includers make as to the material's relevance to the article. This case falls into the latter category. Wikipedia does not like to be used as a test case.
Are there any decent books on 2.6 yet? It's been out for 5 months, that's not long in publishing cycle terms.
What the author of the review doesn't explain is the niche Gimp fills.
He is not reviewing GIMP, he is reviewing a book about it, so that kind of commentary is outside the scope of this book review.
Shooting accuracy is easy and has been standard in bot AI since forever.
I remember one of the best bots add-ons for Quake had "kill emotes" that you could customise for specific bots.
They have $3M in cash and $3M in property, so $6.5M isn't actually over-valuing them, the market is under-valuing them if that's a 100% premium over their market cap.
From TFA:
"We sent our questions over to the Home Office a day before the interview took place, to give them plenty of time to prepare."
That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content.
I can't even access the blog, I get "403 Forbidden"!
Could a journalist kill the Queen to demonstrate a flaw in her security?
Sure, why not? Sheesh. *Plonk*
(ha like it will ever go to court).
It shouldn't go to court, it's a legitimate journalistic investigation. Ever heard of "chilling effect"? I'm astonished at the number of people in this forum advocating dragging journalists into court.
Well it's use of unauthorised computers for further unauthorised activity (unless they asked MS and Google first)...
As I've already said, you might be right on the first point but not the second, I don't need to ask Google or Microsoft's permission to send as many emails as I want to my own Gmail or Hotmail account.