Nothing magical makes technology work just for the US federal government. If technology exists, others can use it, too. What is so hard about this concept?
A better question to ask is why should we trust a government that wants this ability all to itself?
It's in the interests of ARM and AMD to support both GCC and LLVM/clang. So far as I recall, both companies do contribute heavily in code and other resources to both projects.
It's an improvement. This won't stop the use of such tactics, of course. Now they'll just get a warrant to tag your car with GPS tracking and shop around for the easiest judge to sign off on it. That's some protection.
A contract is easier to enforce than many trade secrets laws, and can apply to proprietary information that doesn't neatly fit the definition of trade secrets. But yes, there's also trade secrets laws. They complement one another, non-competes and other things.
See the part that says "any product or service". That's entirely too broad. Have you seen the breadth of things Amazon sells?
This could probably only be enforced if someone was taking proprietary information about how Amazon does things and improves the processes at a competitor.
My back was so screwed up from an auto accident I could barely walk upright for months. When you can't get from the bed to the car or the car to your desk without wincing the whole way, a bike or elliptical is a pretty big challenge.
That sort of thing can get better, and I lost the weight later. It can take some time, though, especially when still working crazy amounts of hours.
Yeah, it takes someone incredibly lazy to work 80 hours a week and suffer injuries that keep one from working out properly. Incredibly lazy.
Nobody's everyone's hero for their fitness level. They might be their own personal hero, or a hero to a friend or family member, but they aren't public heroes like people who save someone stranger's life. It's something that lots of people do. Doing it doesn't make any of us an expert in it.
A weight loss expert is someone who knows how to help a lot of other people overcome their specific situations to lose weight. It's someone who can actually give advice based on a deep understanding of the various issues. It's not someone who says "this is what worked for me so it's definitely going to work for everyone on Slashdot."
"Whee! 30 pounds! I'm a weight loss wonder story fit for the front page!"
It's a good start. Maybe it was all you needed to lose. I know several people (myself included) down by a hundred or more. None of us claim to be experts.
I bought a boxed copy of Caldera OpenLinux back before they merged with SCO and started their "we own Linux" campaign. Even if I needed a Linux license from them, which nobody does, I already had it.
Well, systemd takes some getting used to. It's not perfect. It is nice to write one systemd definition for a service across all systemd-using distros and get daemon watching for free vs. hand-writing all those SysV init scripts.
I've had no problems with these companies after years of use:
SRSPlus (as a reseller)
domain.com
Namecheap
Dotster
The least expensive, best UI, most perks, and best opposition to things like SOPA has been IME the Namecheap option. They usually are the cheapest and are always among the cheapest of the options, too.
I also don't remember Namecheap ever reserving a domain for registration only through them after I did a whois lookup through their web interface. Network Solutions (NSI) did that until ICANN told them to stop. SRSPlus is part of NSI so that's a strike against them.
So IME I can recommend a few, but mostly Namecheap.
Of course the free hardware movement isn't about actual physical devices. Free software isn't about being able to share the compiled code. It's about enabling the sharing of the designs in a specific enough way as to produce the final product; it's sharing the software in source code form. The hardware version would be about the same thing: specs, plans, and designs being open and unencumbered.
There are plenty of places to get readership for a serial these days. BOFH is but one example of a short short serial series. Lots of long-story web comics have a one-page comic out once or twice a week. Many people do a weekly tech blog, business blog, news blog, or politics blog, many of which are multiple case studies or ongoing case studies. Serialized fiction works great on TV. Serialized short stories could definitely find a nice niche again.
Slashdot Mirror
Ummmm... Emusic isn't a player. It's a place other than iTunes to buy music. It comes as MP3 when you buy it.
This isn't iTunes, ya cranky whiner.
I buy my movies and music from Google or every once in a while on physical media. It's pretty hard for Apple to screw those up.
I thought it was damn near a prerequisite these days.
Calling a 350-pound gyro a helicopter is kind of like calling a go-cart a sports car.
The Association for the Advancement of Assonance in the Americas would like a word.
Nothing magical makes technology work just for the US federal government. If technology exists, others can use it, too. What is so hard about this concept? A better question to ask is why should we trust a government that wants this ability all to itself?
It's in the interests of ARM and AMD to support both GCC and LLVM/clang. So far as I recall, both companies do contribute heavily in code and other resources to both projects.
Code that compiles reliably under both is likely to be better code than that which compiles only under one or the other.
I'm okay with them using GPS with a warrant so long as it's not a rubber-stamp warrant from an undiscerning judge.
It's an improvement. This won't stop the use of such tactics, of course. Now they'll just get a warrant to tag your car with GPS tracking and shop around for the easiest judge to sign off on it. That's some protection.
One quiver, many arrows.
A contract is easier to enforce than many trade secrets laws, and can apply to proprietary information that doesn't neatly fit the definition of trade secrets. But yes, there's also trade secrets laws. They complement one another, non-competes and other things.
You skipped the case in which it's not unique code but for which you don't have a library.
See the part that says "any product or service". That's entirely too broad. Have you seen the breadth of things Amazon sells? This could probably only be enforced if someone was taking proprietary information about how Amazon does things and improves the processes at a competitor.
I really hate how every little thing gets some catchy marketing name now that is hard to search. Just give me the damn CVE.
My back was so screwed up from an auto accident I could barely walk upright for months. When you can't get from the bed to the car or the car to your desk without wincing the whole way, a bike or elliptical is a pretty big challenge. That sort of thing can get better, and I lost the weight later. It can take some time, though, especially when still working crazy amounts of hours.
Yeah, it takes someone incredibly lazy to work 80 hours a week and suffer injuries that keep one from working out properly. Incredibly lazy. Nobody's everyone's hero for their fitness level. They might be their own personal hero, or a hero to a friend or family member, but they aren't public heroes like people who save someone stranger's life. It's something that lots of people do. Doing it doesn't make any of us an expert in it. A weight loss expert is someone who knows how to help a lot of other people overcome their specific situations to lose weight. It's someone who can actually give advice based on a deep understanding of the various issues. It's not someone who says "this is what worked for me so it's definitely going to work for everyone on Slashdot."
"Whee! 30 pounds! I'm a weight loss wonder story fit for the front page!" It's a good start. Maybe it was all you needed to lose. I know several people (myself included) down by a hundred or more. None of us claim to be experts.
I bought a boxed copy of Caldera OpenLinux back before they merged with SCO and started their "we own Linux" campaign. Even if I needed a Linux license from them, which nobody does, I already had it.
Well, systemd takes some getting used to. It's not perfect. It is nice to write one systemd definition for a service across all systemd-using distros and get daemon watching for free vs. hand-writing all those SysV init scripts.
Wait... wait... you hate Lennart so much as to pass on a Hans Reiser joke?
I've had no problems with these companies after years of use: SRSPlus (as a reseller) domain.com Namecheap Dotster The least expensive, best UI, most perks, and best opposition to things like SOPA has been IME the Namecheap option. They usually are the cheapest and are always among the cheapest of the options, too. I also don't remember Namecheap ever reserving a domain for registration only through them after I did a whois lookup through their web interface. Network Solutions (NSI) did that until ICANN told them to stop. SRSPlus is part of NSI so that's a strike against them. So IME I can recommend a few, but mostly Namecheap.
When the government tells you what's news, you're in a police state.
Of course the free hardware movement isn't about actual physical devices. Free software isn't about being able to share the compiled code. It's about enabling the sharing of the designs in a specific enough way as to produce the final product; it's sharing the software in source code form. The hardware version would be about the same thing: specs, plans, and designs being open and unencumbered.
There are plenty of places to get readership for a serial these days. BOFH is but one example of a short short serial series. Lots of long-story web comics have a one-page comic out once or twice a week. Many people do a weekly tech blog, business blog, news blog, or politics blog, many of which are multiple case studies or ongoing case studies. Serialized fiction works great on TV. Serialized short stories could definitely find a nice niche again.